7 Things to Watch For in the Democratic Platform Battle

A 15-member panel is debating the Democratic Party's official positions.

Clinton and Sanders have been at odds during the course of the campaign, but many are now calling on the candidates and their backers to unite around a common agenda.

Here are seven issues to watch for potential clashes:

1. Big Banks and Wall Street

2. Israel-Palestine

3. Boosting the Minimum Wage

Both Sanders and Clinton have argued that wealthy Americans should contribute more to Social Security than they currently do. But the campaigns disagree on who should benefit from an expanded program. Sanders has argued that everyone should receive increased benefits, and Clinton has argued that increased benefits should be focused on specific groups. Nancy Altman, a co-director of Strengthen Social Security, a coalition of national and state organizations, credited Sanders for unifying the party behind Social Security expansion, advocating for a plank backing increased benefits “across the board.”

5. Deportations

The main Democratic divide on immigration isn’t between Clinton and Sanders: It’s between the candidates and the White House. Obama has been criticized by members of his own party, including a notable defection by Clinton, for carrying out raids to deport undocumented immigrants during his tenure. “The violence that we’ve heard from the Republican nominee all lead to the conclusion that this party has an opportunity to lead, set a high ground,” Rep. Raul Grijalva, one of the few Sanders backers in Congress, told the panel.

6. Trade: The Trans-Pacific Partnership

7. Washington, D.C.: The 51st State?

Pressure is building for Democrats to officially back Washington, D.C., as the 51st state. “Our nearly 700,000 residents live in the shadow of the nation’s Capitol without a vote in Congress,” D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser told the panel Wednesday. Sanders and Clinton endorsed D.C. statehood during their campaigns. The current platform calls for “full and equal congressional rights” but stops short of advocating for statehood.