White House defending VA secretary pick as senators review allegations against him

The White House is circling the wagons around Rear Admiral Ronny Jackson

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said Wednesday that Jackson's record is "impeccable," while pointing to the praise he received from Presidents Trump and Obama.

"In fact, because he's worked within arm's reach of three presidents, he has received more vetting than most nominees," she said.

The page-and-a-half memo, obtained by ABC News, defends Trump almost as much as it does Jackson, offering context for the president's remarks Tuesday that he would remove himself from consideration if he were in Jackson’s position. “What does he need it for?” Trump asked during a press conference.

“What the President was also telling Dr. Jackson is to make up his own mind and Dr. Jackson has done just that,” the talking points said.

And the memo rejects accusations from some Senate Democrats that the White House did not properly vet Jackson before nominating him.

“I would really push back at the notion that the President needs to do a better job vetting his people,” the memo reads, noting the high marks that President Obama gave Jackson when he was his physician.

"We've talked to a number of folks that have made these claims. The goal here is to get to the bottom of what has happened with Admiral Jackson because we need the very best person as VA secretary to live up the promises we've made to our veterans," Tester said in an interview with ABC News Wednesday.

Tester, who said "over 20 people" have come forward with allegations about Jackson, said he discussed the nomination with White House chief of staff John Kelly.

"John Kelly said, 'Ya know we need to get this guy confirmed, these claims do not have merit.' and I told him, 'Look, we've got to make that determination and have to do some investigation which is what we're doing right now.'"

"He said they could be without merit, he did not say they were without merit. Could be. And so we're making that determination and we're doing the investigation because there is a pattern of conduct that's been reported to us that is disturbing and we need to find out if it's true or not," Tester said.

“I suspect that if he should be confirmed, he will, and if he there are reasons he shouldn't, he won't,” Blunt said.