After initially evading the state's question, ex-Trump CFO Allen Weisselberg denied that he ever met with Trump to discuss his financial statements.

"Did you ever meet with Donald Trump or Michael Cohen where there was discussion of the statement of financial condition before it was finalized?" state attorney Louis Solomon asked.

Weisselberg initially responded that he did not recall such a meeting happening, before answering more definitively.

"No. I don't believe it happened," Weisselberg said.

Judge Engoron, appearing skeptical of the answer, asked Weisselberg to confirm.

"Could it have happened, and you just don't remember?" Engoron asked.

"I am saying it did not happen," Weisselberg responded.

The attorney general's opening statement for the case included a portion of the deposition of former Trump attorney Michael Cohen, who claimed that Trump met with him and Weisselberg to direct them to increase his net worth, in order "to be higher on the Forbes list" of billionaires.

"Allen and I were tasked with taking the assets, increasing each of those asset classes in order to accommodate that eight-billion-dollar number [Trump requested]," Cohen said in the deposition.

Former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg testified that Trump's triplex apartment in Trump Tower is 10,996 square feet -- which is a third the size that Trump claimed on financial documents.

In October 1994, Trump signed a document that certified his penthouse triplex is 10,996 square feet, but his statements of financial condition for several years beginning in 2012 listed the apartment as 30,000 square feet.

An attorney with the New York attorney general's office showed the page with Trump's signature to Weisselberg, who appeared to struggle to explain the discrepancy.

"It was always in my mind a de minimis asset on the statement of financial condition," Weisselberg said. "I never even thought about the apartment."

Louis Solomon of the attorney general's office confronted Weisselberg with emails from Forbes magazine seeking clarity about the apartment's size, as well as a letter signed by Weisselberg certifying the 30,000 square foot figure to the Trump Organization's then-accountant, Mazars USA.

Weisselberg offered a lengthy take on the discrepancy, prompting Judge Arthur Engoron to intercede.

"Your role is to answer the questions, not to give speeches. Please just answer the questions," Engoron said.

"Forbes was right, the triplex was actually only 10,996, right?" Solomon asked.

"Right," Weisselberg finally conceded.

"I've been through quite a bit the last two years," Weisselberg said at one point during the morning's questioning. The former CFO moved to Florida following three months in jail after he pleaded guilty last year to criminal fraud charges and subsequently testified against the Trump Organization.

Ex-Trump CFO Allen Weisselberg is expected to face questions this morning about his work valuing properties like Trump's triplex apartment in Trump Tower and Trump's 40 Wall Street building, as well as the Trump Organization's efforts to secure loans from banks and Weisselberg's direct conversations with the former president.

Weisselberg is the second named defendant to testify in the ongoing civil trial.

Trump Organization controller and co-defendant Jeffrey McConney, who concluded his testimony on Friday, was deemed a hostile witness by Judge Arthur Engoron, giving the state more latitude in their questions.

Ex-Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg's expected testimony this morning comes six months after he was released from New York City's Rikers Island jail complex after pleading guilty last year to 15 felony charges related to a long-running scheme to avoid $1.7 million in taxes while working for the Trump Organization.

As a condition of his plea deal, Weisselberg testified last year in the Manhattan district attorney's criminal trial of the Trump Organization itself.

"Are you embarrassed about what you did?" Trump Organization attorney Alan Futerfas asked Weisselberg during the criminal trial last November.

"More than you can imagine," replied Weisselberg, who testified that Trump himself was unaware of his tax evasion scheme.

The Trump Organization was convicted and later paid a $1.6 million fine imposed by the judge overseeing the case.

An attorney for Judge Arthur Engoron also filed in support of the gag order in Donald Trump's civil fraud trial, arguing that violent threats have increased since the gag order was lifted.

The limited gag order, which prohibited Donald Trump and his attorneys from publicly commenting about Engoron's staff, was issued by the judge last month after Trump posted about the judge's law clerk on social media. Judge David Friedman of the appellate division's First Department stayed the order on Thursday, citing constitutional concerns over Trump's free speech rights.

Engoron's filing includes a report from Charles Hollon of the Judicial Threats Assessment Unit of the New York State Court System's Department of Public Safety. According to the report, Engoron and his principal law clerk, Allison Greenfield, have been inundated with credible, violent and antisemitic threats since Trump began criticizing Greenfield.

"The threats against Justice Engoron and Ms. Greenfield are considered to be serious and credible and not hypothetical or speculative," Hollon wrote in the report.

Greenfield has been the victim of daily doxing of her personal email address and phone number, receiving dozens of calls, emails and social media messages daily, according to Hollon. Approximately half the harassing messages have been antisemitic, according to Greenfield.

In the report, Hollon wrote that Engoron was the subject of credible threats before the trial had started, but Trump's Oct. 3 Truth Social post directed at Greenfield exponentially increased the number of threats directed at her.

The report included multiple examples of voicemails that were left on the telephone in Engoron's chambers.

Hollon said the messages have created an "ongoing security risk" for Engoron, his staff and family, but that the gag order had been effective in lowering the number of threats.

"The implementation of the limited gag orders resulted in a decrease in the number of threats, harassment and disparaging messages that the judge and his staff received," Hollon said in the report. "However, when Mr. Trump violated the gag orders, the number of threatening, harassing and disparaging messages increased."

Engoron's lawyer, Lisa Evans, said the threats detailed in Hollon's affirmation justify the gag order, which functions as a reasonable limit on free speech.

"The First Amendment does not prohibit courts from limiting speech that threatens the safety of the court's staff," Evans wrote.

Trump's reply to the filing is due on Nov. 27, after which the First Department will decide whether to fully lift the gag order.