Prosecutor Nathan Wade is in the courtroom as today's hearing gets underway, but so far DA Fani Willis is not.

Judge Scott McAfee previously told the multiple defense attorneys he would give them one "time block" today for their closing arguments, and that they could "use the time how you think is effective."

The state will also make a closing argument.

Judge Scott McAfee will hear what is expected to be final arguments this afternoon on motions to disqualify DA Fani Willis based on allegations that she benefited financially from a romantic relationship with prosecutor Nathan Wade.

Both Willis and Wade testified their relationship began after he was hired for the case in 2021, and that Willis reimbursed Wade in cash for vacations they took that were booked on his credit card.

Defense lawyers initially argued that Wade's former law partner and divorce lawyer, Terrence Bradley, would contradict Wade and Willis' claim on the stand about when the relationship began, but Bradley instead testified earlier this week that any past statements he made to that effect were "speculation on my part."

Bradley, according to text messages read in court, previously told defense attorney Ashleigh Merchant -- who led the charge on the disqualification effort -- that Willis and Wade's relationship began long before he was hired, raising potential credibility issues for Judge McAfee to consider.

"Absolutely," Bradley wrote Merchant in a text message read in court. "[The relationship] started when she left the DAS office and was judge in South Fulton."

Judge McAfee had left open the possibility that he could "reopen" the evidentiary process after both the defense and state submitted motions containing new evidence, telling them they could both "proffer" their evidence at the hearing and that he would make a determination.

Trump's attorney are seeking to admit data from Nathan Wade's cellphone they say shows Wade in the area of Willis' home dozens of times before he was hired, which the state disputes. The state is also seeking to enter an affidavit from a winery employee they say will back up Willis' claims that she paid for her and Wade's excursions in cash.

After more than two hours, Tuesday's hearing concluded without providing any revelatory information about the timeline of the romantic relationship between Fulton County prosecutor Nathan Wade and DA Fani Willis, which the defense contends started before Wade was hired, in contrast to what both Wade and Willis have testified.

Judge Scott McAfee said that he plans to hear arguments from the parties on Friday about the case for Willis' disqualification so he can try to make a ruling.

"At this point, I need to start hearing the arguments and the law and what we've heard so far. If I think I'm able to reach a ruling based on that, I will," McAfee said.

He added that the parties could push to continue presenting evidence if needed.

"The intention is that we're still sticking with the argument," McAfee said. "But the parties are free to address some of these issues that have been brought up, post-hearing, if they'd like to."

Following a break, the state declined to question prosecutor Nathan Wade's former attorney Terrence Bradley after the defense wrapped up their questioning.

Bradley has stepped down from the stand after approximately two hours of testimony.

The parties are now debating Bradley's text messages being entered as evidence.

The state is claiming that Bradley did not authenticate the entire text message exchange, and has asked the judge to parse through it to determine its relevance to the case.

Adam Abbate, an attorney with the district attorney's office, argued that defendants had failed to meet the "high standard of proof" for disqualification -- calling the narrative they spun about Willis and Wade's relationship "absolutely absurd."

"It doesn't make any sense," Abbate said. "The motions to disqualify should be denied, and Miss Willis as district attorney of Fulton County, and Mr. Wade, as the special prosecutor assigned to this case, should be allowed to remain on this case and continue to prosecute the case."

Contrary to what defense attorneys argued, Abbate argued that they must prove an "actual conflict" of interest to secure a disqualification -- not just the "appearance of impropriety."

"The defense has to show an actual conflict, and in this instance, they have to show in the actual conflict would be that Miss Willis received a financial benefit or gain -- and got it based upon the outcome of the case," Abbate said.

"We have absolutely no evidence that Miss Willis received any financial gain or benefit," he argued. "The testimony was that Miss Willis paid all of the money back in cash as related to the trips."

Judge McAfee seemed skeptical of that argument, citing language that allows for removal based on the "appearance of impropriety" and referencing examples of past misconduct raised by the defendants.

Abbate pushed back, arguing that in each of those cases, the "appearance of impropriety ... arose from the fact that the court found an actual conflict in each of those cases."

Abbate also called into question the credibility of defendants' key witnesses in the disqualification hearings, calling the testimony of Robin Yeartie, ex-friend of Willis, "at best inconsistent."