Trump trial: Trump hit with contempt, witnesses detail Stormy Daniels deal
Stormy Daniels' former attorney testified on Day 9 of Trump's hush money trial.
Former President Donald Trump is on trial in New York City, where he is facing felony charges related to a 2016 hush money payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. It marks the first time in history that a former U.S. president has been tried on criminal charges.
Trump last April pleaded not guilty to a 34-count indictment charging him with falsifying business records in connection with a hush money payment his then-attorney Michael Cohen made to Daniels in order to boost his electoral prospects in the 2016 presidential election.
Top headlines:
What to know about the hush money case
READ MORE: Here's what you need to know about the historic case.
Prosecutors want to ask Trump about gag order violations
In a conference with with judge and other attorneys during the mid-morning break, prosecutor Matthew Colangelo told Judge Merchan that prosecutors would like to cross-examine Donald Trump, if he opts to testify, about his nine violations of the case's limited gag order that the judge handed down this morning.
"The people will seek to cross-examine him on those findings," Colangelo said.
Colangelo also argued that prosecutors should be able to introduce evidence about what he called Trump's "pressure campaign" and "intimidation effort" for witnesses like Michael Cohen.
Colangelo argued that defense attorneys "opened the door" to the evidence during their opening statement by arguing that some of the witnesses like Cohen and Stormy Daniels benefited personally from their involvement in the case. He mentioned that prosecutors have approximately half-a-dozen exhibits to demonstrate Trump's effort attacking witnesses.
Colangelo said the evidence would help show Trump's "consciousness of guilt" and explain why some witnesses made contradictory statements about the case.
Farro says opening Cohen's LLC account raised no red flags
While Michael Cohen's former banker, Gary Farro, testified that Cohen took steps to quickly open the account for Essential Consultants, the shell company Cohen used to pay Stormy Daniels, Farro said the process did not prompt any red flags based on the information Cohen provided.
"Not based on the answers I was given ... on the questions I asked," Farro said when asked about potential red flags.
Farro added that accounts in the real estate world were often opened quickly.
"It's not unusual, it's not every time. It's not unusual," Farro said.
Farro testified that he was not involved with the decision to end First Republic Bank's relationship with Cohen, adding that if a client provides false information, First Republic Bank would sever their relationship.
"The decision was not mine," Farro said during a brief re-cross examination.
Farro explains how Cohen's LLC account was opened
Gary Farro, under cross-examination, said that First Republic Bank did not open the account for Essential Consultants LLC for Michael Cohen to operate a shell company.
"I don't open up shell corporations," Farro, who was Cohen's banker, said of the LLC that was used for Cohen to send payment to Stormy Daniels in 2016. "Shell corporations that have no business behind them would give me pause."
While First Republic allows some accounts to be opened with limited transactions -- such as an account for an LLC to own a property or aircraft -- the account created by Cohen had the listed business purpose of "investment consulting" work, according to evidence.
Farro added that the information that Cohen provided -- such as not listing himself as someone's agent -- allowed the account to be opened quicker.
"Not only would it raise more questions, but it would require more paperwork," Farro said.
Farro says Cohen was removed as his client in 2017
Under cross-examination by defense attorney Todd Blanche, Michael Cohen's former banker testified about his first interactions with Cohen.
Gary Farro said his boss introduced him to Michael Cohen in Cohen's office in Trump Tower.
"He was a challenging client because of his desire to get things done so quickly," Farro said. "Ninety percent of the time, it was an urgent matter."
Farro said that his supervisors removed Cohen as his client in 2017, as the details about the transactions in question "went public."
"They didn't want me to have communication with the client any longer," Farro said.