NFL Appeals Court Ruling Overturning Tom Brady's Punishment for Deflategate

Tom Brady's Deflategate saga continued in a Manhattan court today.

Today, the federal appeals court judges handling the NFL's appeal questioned why they should "second guess" Brady's punishment and also whether the punishment was "draconian for a few pounds per square inch."

The judges seemed to be hardest on Jeffrey Kessler, who spoke on behalf of Brady and the National Football League Players Association.

"The evidence of ball tampering is compelling, if not overwhelming," Judge Denny Chin said in reference to Brady.

Brady did not make an appearance in court.

The judges also questioned Kessler on why Brady destroyed his cell phone, saying it "raised the stakes" in the case. Kessler told them that Brady refused to turn over his phone due to privacy and stalking reasons.

Prior to the court hearing, in an argument to affirm the original judge's decision to overturn the suspension, the NFLPA said Goodell failed "to observe the most fundamental requirements of fair arbitration proceedings." In response, the NFL called Goodell’s decision “eminently reasonable” and firmly grounded in the collective bargaining agreement.

Despite facing relentless questioning from the judges, the NFLPA said it was "very happy with the proceeding" following today's appearance. Requests for comment from Brady's agent, Tom Yee, were not immediately returned.

ABC News' Aaron Katersky contributed to this report.