Trump trial updates: Appeals court denies defense's bid for judge's recusal
The defense rested its case Tuesday without testimony from Donald Trump.
Former President Donald Trump is on trial in New York City, where he is facing felony charges related to a 2016 hush money payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. It marks the first time in history that a former U.S. president has been tried on criminal charges.
Trump last April pleaded not guilty to a 34-count indictment charging him with falsifying business records in connection with a hush money payment his then-attorney Michael Cohen made to Daniels in order to boost his electoral prospects in the 2016 presidential election.
Top headlines:
What to know about the hush money case
READ MORE: Here's what you need to know about the historic case.
Prosecutors seek to introduce photo from time of phone call
Judge Merchan dismissed the jury for the lunch break, after which prosecutor Joshua Steinglass asked permission to show the jury a photo of Donald Trump and his bodyguard Keith Schiller together on Oct. 24, 2016, at 7:57 p.m.
Prosecutors hope to introduce the evidence to counter the defense suggestion that Cohen lied about the purpose of an Oct. 24, 2016, phone call to Schiller.
"It shows that they were together," Steinglass said of the photo.
Defense attorney Todd Blanche pushed back on the request, arguing the photo is inadmissible and that testimony about the time and date of it would be hearsay. Blanche added that the fact that Trump and Schiller were together on Oct. 24 is not in dispute; rather, defense lawyers have hammered at the substance of Cohen's call with Schiller.
"I have significant evidence that he lied under oath," Blanche said about Cohen's testimony about the phone call.
Judge Merchan said he would discuss the issue further after lunch.
Prosecutors press Cohen on legality of Daniels' NDA
On redirect examination, prosecutor Susan Hoffinger asked Michael Cohen about his testimony on cross-examination that nondisclosure agreements are perfectly legal and that the contract with Stormy Daniels was also legal.
Hoffinger sought to emphasize how out of the ordinary this particular NDA was.
"Under the circumstances of this NDA with Stormy Daniels -- was that perfectly legal under those circumstances?" Hoffinger asked, referring to efforts to affect the 2016 election.
"No ma'am," Cohen said.
Cohen testifies about fake AI case citations
On redirect examination, Michael Cohen offered some context about how he claims he inadvertently provided some fake case law to the court during a recent bid to end his supervised release.
"I went onto Google Bard which is an AI search engine," Cohen said. "It gave me a plethora of cases that appeared to me to be legitimate. They certainly looked legitimate and there were facts behind it and supported what we were going to put in the upcoming motion."
"I was just trying to be helpful," Cohen added.
But when Cohen showed the cases to his current lawyer, she noticed they were "not legitimate."
At her recommendation, Cohen said he notified the court about the fake cases.
Cohen says he has nothing at stake as a witness
Michael Cohen testified under redirect examination that he had nothing at stake in the outcome of Trump's criminal trial.
"Are you actually on trial here?" Hoffinger asked.
"No ma'am," Cohen said.
"Are you a witness here?" Hoffinger asked.
"I am," Cohen said.
"Are you charged with any crimes here?" Hoffinger asked.
"No ma'am," Cohen said.
While Cohen was subpoenaed to testify at this trial, he described his outlook about the trial as markedly different from his participation and plea in a 2018 federal investigation.
"My life was on the line. My liberty. I was the defendant in the case," Cohen said.
Appeals court denies defense's bid for judge's recusal
New York's Appellate Division has upheld Judge Juan Merchan's decision not to recuse himself from former President Trump's hush money case.
Trump's defense team had sought Merchan's recusal based on his daughter's work for a consulting firm with Democratic clients.
A panel of appellate judges ruled that Trump failed to prove the judge overstepped his authority by denying a defense motion for recusal.
"Petitioner has failed to establish that the court acted in excess of its jurisdiction by denying his motion," today's order said. "Petitioner also has not established that he has a clear right to recusal."
The judges also found that the defense appeal was procedurally improper since they waited too long to appeal Merchan's August 2023 recusal order, then rushed to the Appellate Division before Merchan ruled on their more recent recusal motion.
The appellate court also upheld Merchan's decision denying Trump's argument that some of his social media posts were covered by presidential immunity.
The appeals court said Trump could include both appeals in its general appeal of the verdict should he be found guilty.
The court also denied Trump's request for a change of venue for the trial, which Trump had sought before the trial began last month.
The former president has repeatedly criticized Judge Merchan as "conflicted" throughout the trial.