Following a brief huddle with his attorney Todd Blanche and legal adviser Boris Epshteyn, former President Trump departed the courtroom at the conclusion of the second week of his criminal trial.

In remarks to reporters, he reiterated that there is "no case."

Court is off on Monday, so the proceedings will resume Tuesday morning.

-ABC News' Kelsey Walsh and Mike Pappano

Banker Gary Farro testified that he got an urgent message from Michael Cohen on October 13, 2016.

According to Farro, Cohen needed to quickly create a new business named Resolution Consultants LLC.

"My understanding was it was a real estate consulting company," Farro testified.

According to prosecutors, Resolution Consultants LLC was the shell company that Cohen planned to use to pay for the exclusive rights to Karen McDougal's story in which she claimed to have had a yearlong sexual relationship with Trump.

Farro walked through the paperwork used to create the Delaware-based company, including a description, which said it was a consulting firm to offer "strategy, PR and marketing." He collected Cohen's signature and an affirmation that the company would not involve political fundraising.

"[It] would be something the bank wants to know," Farro said on the stand about political contributions, adding that it would trigger an additional review by the bank.

Farro said that while the company was established, it was never funded. Prosecutors allege that the deal that prompted the creation of the account -- paying National Enquirer parent AMI for the McDougal story -- fell through at the last minute.

A few weeks later, Farro received another phone call from Cohen on October 26, 2016.

"He stated he was changing course," Farro said. Prosecutor Becky Mangold asked if Cohen made the call seem urgent.

"Every time Michael Cohen spoke to me, he gave a sense of urgency," Farro said. "This is one of those times."

Farro testified he was busy at the time -- "I was at a golf course, very cliche for a banker" -- but a colleague handled Cohen's request for the paperwork for a new company called Essential Consultants LLC.

In the paperwork, Cohen described it as a "real estate consulting company to collect fees for investment consulting work he does for real estate deals," Farro said.

According to prosecutors, Cohen that day transferred $131,000 from a personal home equity line of credit into an account for Essential Consultants LLC.

The next day, Cohen transferred $130,000 from that account to a lawyer for Stormy Daniels, prosecutors allege.

Farro's testimony is expected to continue when court resumes on Tuesday. The proceedings have adjourned until then.

Gary Farro, formerly a senior managing director at First Republic Bank, testified that he first met Michael Cohen when Cohen became a banking client of his in 2015, after one of Farro's colleagues left the bank.

Asked why Cohen was assigned to him, Farro cited his "ability to handle individuals who might be a little challenging."

"Frankly, I didn't find him that difficult," Farro remarked.

First Republic Bank had a branch across the street from Trump Tower, where Cohen worked. Farro said Cohen frequently visited the bank and eagerly told him that he worked for Trump.

"He was a lawyer or is a lawyer. I am not sure," Farro said about Cohen, who was disbarred in 2019.

Prosecutors are now walking through First Republic Bank's policies for retaining documents. Prosecutors plan to use Farro as a custodial witness to authenticate records that will be used as evidence.

Following the conclusion of Rhona Graff's testimony, prosecutors called Gary Farro as their next witness.

Farro currently works at Flagstar Bank. He said he is testifying voluntarily, though he said he received a subpoena prior to his testimony.

Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker testified that he suspected that multiple women would come forward to shop stories about Trump during Trump's run for president.

"In a presidential campaign, I was the person that thought there would be a lot of women who came out to sell their stories because Mr. Trump was well known as the most eligible bachelor and dated the most beautiful woman," Pecker testified. "It is very common for these women to call up a magazine like the National Enquirer to try and sell their stories. I would hear it in the marketplace through other sources that stories were being marketed."

If those stories emerged, Pecker said he vowed that he would notify Michael Cohen, Trump's then-personal attorney, per their agreement.

According to Pecker, most elements of their agreement -- including running positive stories about Trump and negative stories about his opponents -- were "mutually beneficial" to Trump and Pecker.

"Hillary running for president and Bill Clinton's womanizing was one of the biggest sales ... for the National Enquirer," Pecker said. " It was easy for me to say I was going to continue running those kinds of stories for the National Enquirer."

"It would help his campaign, but it would also help me," Pecker said.

"As I recollect, [Trump] was pleased. Michael Cohen was pleased [about] the way I was going to handle these issues," Pecker said.

Pecker said that prior to the 2016 election, his magazines never caught and killed any stories for Trump.

When pressed by prosecutor Joshua Steinglass, Pecker acknowledged that the catch-and-kill element of the agreement -- buying negative information about Trump then killing the story -- was not beneficial for the National Enquirer.

"How was that going to boost sales of the National Enquirer?" Steinglass asked.

"No, that part didn't help," Pecker said.