South Carolina primary 2024: Trump projected to win, Haley vows to stay in the race
What can we take away from Trump's big Palmetto State victory?
Former President Donald Trump has won the South Carolina Republican primary, ABC News projects. It was a swift and embarrassing defeat for former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, who rose to political prominence as South Carolina’s governor. Nevertheless, in her concession speech, Haley vowed to continue her campaign into Super Tuesday on March 5.
Throughout the evening, 538 reporters, analysts and contributors broke down the results as they came in with live updates, analysis and commentary. Read our full live blog below.
Latest headlines:
Answer: Trump isn't doing that well, but that doesn't mean he'll lose this fall
For the purposes of this analysis, I think we should view Trump as an incumbent when measuring his performance in the primary. Republican voters know exactly what Trump is like in the White House, and they can judge for themselves how he did on the issues they care about (he generally does well on this axis) and his character (things are more muddled here).
If we think of him as an incumbent, he is doing quite poorly. Remember how Pat Buchanan embarrassed H.W. Bush by getting 38 percent of the vote in New Hampshire in 1992 and is blamed for weakening him for the general? Haley has been doing better than Buchanan across the early states. There are plenty of Republican voters who don't think of Trump as ideal. We've probably all heard their arguments. Something along the line of, "his character isn't ideal, but he fights for me."
Now, what does this all mean for the contest against Biden in the fall? Not much. The vast majority of those people will vote for Trump in the fall. And if we are sticking with the 1992 comparison, Bill Clinton was a popular candidate (net +11 favorability in September of '92). Joe Biden is not. His favorability rating is currently at net -15 points. So, Trump is doing poorly, but so is Biden. When it's a race to the bottom all around, doing poorly in a GOP primary doesn't tell us all that much.
—Galen Druke, 538
Answer: I think Trump is doing well, yeah
I see your point, Mary — Trump has gotten “only” around 50-60 percent in the first three contested states — but I think in the grand scheme of things, that’s still a strong performance. Iowa winners much more often finish in the 20s or 30s, and New Hampshire is just weird because of its demographics and high proportion of independent voters. And at the end of the day, he’s the first non-incumbent Republican to win all three of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, and there’s a good chance he’s going to win all 56 contests.
—Nathaniel Rakich, 538
Answer: He’s not not doing well
For a non-incumbent (if former president), Trump has made short work of the primary calendar, basically annihilating any real competitors in record time without ever having to deign to step foot on a debate stage. The fact that he didn’t completely cruise to the nomination captures some of the hesitancy in the party that Julia highlighted, but at the end of the day, all Trump needs to do now is be more popular than Biden, who isn’t exactly the Prom King these days.
—Kaleigh Rogers, 538
Answer: Expectations are hard to benchmark
I'm honestly not sure there is a clear way to go about establishing what Trump "should" be winning, Mary. On the one hand, polls had him at 61 percent, so 60 percent of the vote (as of now) is pretty good — especially if you consider he'll win the nomination easily by mid-March if this is the case.
Another benchmark would be the percent of the GOP electorate that calls themselves "part of the MAGA movement." According to preliminary ABC exit polls, that's about 44 percent of SC voters (50 percent said no and 6 percent were unsure). So by this benchmark, Trump is actually overperforming.
Too bad there aren't a whole lot of modern examples of former presidents + failed presidential candidates running in subsequent primaries, or else we could try to establish historical baselines. Trump's performance right now is somewhere between George H.W. Bush vs. Pat Buchanan and Jimmy Carter vs. Ted Kennedy. Both of those incumbents lost in the general.
—G. Elliott Morris, 538
ICYMI: What’s been happening in the GOP primary
If you're not quite as election-obsessed as us here at 538, please allow me (a person who willfully chose to spend an evening three weeks into her maternity leave watching the GOP debate) to fill you in on the last few weeks.
At the start of the year, there were still six major candidates competing for the Republican Party nomination. By the end of January, only two remained. In Iowa, Trump came out on top with 51 percent of the vote, followed by DeSantis and Haley. Ramaswamy and Hutchinson both dropped out after the Iowa caucuses (Christie dropped out just before), while DeSantis ended his campaign just before the New Hampshire primary, where Trump defeated Haley 54 percent to 43 percent.
So far, though, Haley has refused to throw in the towel, despite trailing Trump badly in polls.
She also did poorly in two additional contests in early February. In Nevada, where Trump wasn't even on the primary ballot (he was on the ballot for the Nevada GOP caucus … it was a whole thing), she still got only 31 percent, with voters preferring the electoral equivalent of "none of the above." And she lagged behind Trump in the Virgin Islands GOP caucuses, too.
I'll have more in a bit about why Haley might still be running, but suffice to say it's an uphill battle against the former president.
—Kaleigh Rogers, 538