Bank of America Under Hacking Attack?

Chuck Burton/AP Photo
For a third consecutive business day Bank of America’s homepage is suffering serious disruption. The nation’s largest bank by deposits, with 12 percent of Americans’ bank accounts and over a trillion dollars in deposits, told ABC News “the cause is still under review, but we have ruled out hacking, malware, or any link to the debit fee. We have not said the issues were due to volume either.”
Despite repeated requests from ABC News, the bank has refused to explain the source of these now chronic service problems.
Cyber-security experts counter the only explanation for outages on four of five consecutive days is a so-called denial of service attack.
“The only reasonable conclusion is that they are under attack,” says Steve Gibson, an Internet security expert. ”A site of that size should be expected to handle huge volume with no trouble at all…the only time we ever see anything like this is when some major site has upset a group of hackers.”
Denial of service attacks occur when a site is inundated with an enormous number of apparently legitimate requests. It explains why the site’s homepage alone seems to be suffering the brunt of the disruptions.
“What’s scary,” says Gibson, “is that it only takes the whim of a teenager to take a site like this off line,” explaining that denial of service attacks are relatively simple to engineer.
The outages, which includes the bank’s hobbled home page as well as delays and difficulty in accessing online banking, began Friday morning, a day after the bank announced it would charge a $5 monthly fee for account holders using their debit cards.
Bank of America says it would waive that fee for those with “Premium” accounts – which require a minimum monthly balance of $5000.
ABCNews’ Bert Rudman contributed to this report

Email
Memorial Day Deals
Man Charged in Deposit Error Spending Spree 




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
I hope it is…I LOATHE this bank.
Posted by: FreeinNH | October 4, 2011, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Jeez, this is a shame. Perhaps BofA should be keeping employees in place who might be able to help with this problem instead of planning to lay off up to 30,000!
Posted by: RohnertPark1 | October 4, 2011, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Who can afford to keep a balance of $5K or $6K………..ok better yet who can even dream of having anything left at the end of the month. Times are hard, money is short perfect time for the bank to suck you dry!
Posted by: Realy? | October 4, 2011, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
A teenager with a home PC >cannot< take down a multi-billion dollar bank with a nation-wide infrastructure. How is it that this "Gibson", a so-called "expert" can be published and not fact-checked?
Posted by: Jefferson | October 4, 2011, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Citibank will charge $15.a month for checking accounts? Is that a typo? If not, that is outrageous to the point of criminality!!!
Posted by: commonsensenow | October 4, 2011, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
They are charging 5 dollars due to the new frank dodd credit/debit card act that went into effect Oct. 1. They are no longer able to charge retail business (that includes my small business) the rates they once used to, so now they are passing it on to the card holders. So, I as a tiny small business owner was getting screwed, and now as a consumer at the grocery store, I am getting screwed. Seems like they will get their money either way. 20 years of exorbinant fees for business, and now fees for consumers cards. If you take a quiet moment and really think hard about this, the best way to get around all these s.o.b’s is to get a smaller bank, use checks or cold hard cash. I see more and more people using cash at my business, and I think as time goes on, more people will go back to basics as the fees charged on everything lately seem to be nickel and diming everyone to poverty.
Posted by: jjbean | October 4, 2011, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
It’s karma. With all these bank charges, I think they will eventually see a back lash. I stopped using banks a long time ago. I use credit unions now because they don’t have nearly the charges. If they start, I will be strictly cash and carry. I will only use them for a deposit box where I will stash my extra cash.
Posted by: Catherine | October 4, 2011, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Can you spell credit union
Posted by: joe | October 4, 2011, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
I’m glad! Bank of America and Wells Fargo are the worst of the worst! It’s time customers march with their feet! I’m joining a credit union. Enough of this price gouging when they’re making record profits … would you like another taxpayer-lead bailout, B. of A.??
Posted by: tstorm | October 4, 2011, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Catherine – you beat me to the punch. Forget the banks.
Posted by: joe | October 4, 2011, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
This is BOA’s comeuppance for taking $45 billion from taxpayers and then charging their customers for not keeping $5000 in their checking accounts. How many customers can keep a $5000 balance in their accounts during the worst economic crisis ever? Their demands on their customers are absolutely ridiculous and just an excuse to grab more of their money in fees. No wonder why BOA was able to come up with the money to pay back the fed govt. Down with BOA! Boycott BOA!
Posted by: Bob | October 4, 2011, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
I’ve had my accounts at a credit union for over 30 years and I will never EVER use a bank. I pay absolutely nothing. No minimum balance, no service charges.
Posted by: Office Goddess | October 4, 2011, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
The idiots wishing the worst for BOA must have financial suicide on their minds. Note that it holds 12% (the largest single amount) of the nation’s deposits and those deposits are made up primarily be individual citizens such as me. If the web problem is externally caused, it is preventing a reasonably normal citizen and spouse from making financial transactions such as payments that keep the economy, such that it is, moving a little more forward. If this activity causes the bank to fail, the U.S. Government (can you say “Joe and Jane taxpayer” will be out the FDIC insurance that covers our deposits. Face it folks, this is not the old west and disrupters are not Jesse James but the result is still the same. If you hit the bank, you hit its deposits whose owners in turn hit the economy which in turn cuts more jobs. What part of this do you not understand?
Posted by: wantingbalance | October 4, 2011, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Joe – I went credit union 30 yrs. ago when someone stole my check book and the bank told me they would charge me $5 per check to have stop payments put on. It was a nearly full book. It was cheaper to close my accounts and risk bouncing a couple of checks. They thought I was small potatoes so no loss, until I also closed my grandmother’s account as well, she was a big customer (I had power of attorney). Then and only then did a bank president come out and offer to waive the fees. Guess what I told him.
Posted by: Catherine | October 4, 2011, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Credit unions are the way to go for many reasons!
Posted by: Kathy M. | October 4, 2011, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Why would anyone back with BofA? this is why I LOVE my credit union.
Posted by: trussell | October 4, 2011, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
JJBEAN , these criminals are never out of dubious ways to swindle consumers. These banks have to feed their CEOs with obscene bonuses
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | October 4, 2011, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
TRUSSELL @ OCTOBER 4,__”Why would anyone back with BofA? “___________As a customer with this bank for years, this is a question that I keep asking myself. All that is going to change soon
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | October 4, 2011, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
I can’t complain yet, our balance is large enough to offset the cost at Citi, but I would probably be pitching a fit if I had to pay it…if the government would stay out of banks and business no one would be paying those fees, so if you are ticked blame the PROPER people first (the government)
Posted by: samhiguchi | October 4, 2011, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
I told everyone last week the B of A site is being attacked by a DOS (Denial of Service) type of attack. And yes, all it takes is one person to bring the site down to it’s knees, but this is probably now being done by multiple hackers who have joined in running their DOS bots against B of A. I believe these attacks will continue (off and on) until B of A management reverses their greedy decision to charge fees for using their debit cards. Let’s see how long it will take them to make the DOS attack to debit card fee association…
Posted by: RalphF | October 4, 2011, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
“the cause is still under review, but we have ruled out hacking, malware, or any link to the debit fee.” — right…dream on…
Posted by: RalphF | October 4, 2011, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Folks, get your mattresses ready. It’s time to go back to the old ways of banking. Stop feeding these greedy idiots with your hard earned money. I am a customer at Bank of America. It seems to me the bank has a “black hole” or a sink hole hidden somewhere within the bank. It has this dubious program called “keep the change.” Here is how it works: Every time you use your debit card to make purchases on your checking account, the bank transfers an amount into your savings account, and before you know it, that money disappears. The bank calls it “fees”
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | October 4, 2011, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
‘It turns out that there may be a method to Bank of America’s madness. The bank claims that the move is in response to a pretty big anticipated loss in profit as a result of the so-called “Durbin Amendment.” The Durbin Amendment is an add-on to the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law No. 111-203), signed into law by President Barack Obama on July 21, 2010. The Act was meant to protect us from all of those banks that were too big to fail – you know, the whole banking/financial sector meltdown that we just lived through.
The Durbin Amendment, named after Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), was added to the bill after flopping around for the better part of a year. The law applies to those big banks – the ones over $10 billion in assets – and was ostensibly passed as an effort to increase competition. It was supposed to be pro-consumer.
But here’s the kicker: the Amendment gave the Federal Reserve the power to regulate debit card interchange fees and other bits of banking admin, which they’ve done. Over the summer, the Fed released the final rule on the matter. The combination of fees, restrictions and caps is thought to cost banks subject to the amendment nearly $14 billion annually.” *Forbes*
Posted by: samhiguchi | October 4, 2011, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
“Can you spell credit union”____________JOE, Now I can. I am off to the college campus to talk to their representatives. They are always there to talk to students about their services.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | October 4, 2011, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Bank of America is a financial terrorist organization. Please stop supporting businesses like this. Please support your local bank. Power of the people. Together we stand divided we fall.
Posted by: Jonny | October 4, 2011, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
From reading these posts, no wonder support for Occupy Wall Street is growing. Interesting predicament that cuts across the political spectrum
Posted by: Jim | October 4, 2011, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
This bank should be renamed Bank of a Feeica. All they do is fee you to death. Take your money out and never ever open a bank acct with them. They are 100% evil.
Posted by: Eek | October 4, 2011, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
The Federal Government reduced the amount banks could charge merchants for debit card transacions. The obvious question is why in a free market should the government be imposing price controls. Now we have a case of unintened consequenses– the consumer is being charged. I use B of A and intend to contiue. I’d like to see the government interfering with the free market.
Posted by: free_2_choose | October 4, 2011, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
@Realy?:
Yes, a teenager with a home PC most certainly CAN take down the website of a major bank. Remember, it’s not the bank he’s attacking, it’s just their website. Look up “Mafiaboy” if you still have doubts.
And Steve Gibson is a very well-known security expert, and knows as much (or more) about computer security than anyone else in the world. No additional fact checking is necessary – he’s 100% legit.
Posted by: Jake | October 4, 2011, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
I belong to what, until now, I considered to be a small bank (Fulton Bank in Pennsylvania). This month, I noticed a “sevice fee” of $2.00 on my statement. I took the statement to my local branch and was informed that the “fee” was for the copied images of the front of my checks that were previously included with my statements for free. I have to admire the creativity of the banking industry–they are masters at devising “fees” for practically everything. You’d think they were an airline!
Posted by: Ty | October 4, 2011, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
WOW… Obama’s and the Dems are having a bad week!! ——– Dick Durbin tells consumers to exit Bank of America from the floor of congress… because BOA is changing fee schedules due to Durbin’s amendment to Dodd-Frank… LOL!! —- Obama is caught in a lie about when he knew about Fast and Furious… and Holder is changing his story… LOL!! —- Emails surface proving Obama knew Solyndra might not survive well before he pushed for government-backed loans… LOL!!! —— Bernanke admits Obama’s recovery (and economy) is faltering… NO LOL… disastrous!!! —– Just RESIGN OBAMA… and let competent and honest people run this country!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | October 4, 2011, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
“and let competent and honest people run this country”. . . Like who? There is certainly no one currently running for Pres that fits that description.
Posted by: Jim | October 4, 2011, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
First the fee increase, and then an obvious lie about the DOS. I am not sure I can trust a company like that.
Posted by: Ritami | October 4, 2011, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Strange this is only reported on one major news site. More than likely is a systemwide software installation gone bad and they do not want to admit their error. Getting rid of the many experienced IT folks for young cheap whippersnappers that think they know it all. The login has changed to the same as used on AT&T so you would assume they are in the process of installing this new system or upgradiing, and it went wrong. And voters have no reason to complain about the state of american banking they supported the politicians that did away with Glass Steagall and allowed the forming of these big banks, bad move so is privatization of what should be AMERICAN ASSETS oil electricity food things all need for basic life and given freely in the earth, a few take to rule for profit, only bliind sheep would follow those that love money more than the lord.
Posted by: adamfreed | October 4, 2011, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Fulton Bank a small bank? Ha! They’re all over central PA where I now live, and they are also in my former hometown in the northern Philly ‘burbs, a full 100 miles away. My girlfriend banks with their subsidiary, “The Bank”, which is found all over southern NJ. On the other hand, my SMALL local Lebanon County, PA bank just expanded. They opened their 10th branch recently, and they have no such fees.
Posted by: Bill (AshburnStadium) | October 4, 2011, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Bank of America is seeing red now.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | October 4, 2011, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
JIM, here is LA, citizens are occupying city hall
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | October 4, 2011, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Jim 3:28 pm —- If you don’t fire someone for incompetence… it rewards that incompetence!! —– Don’t get mad at me for pointing out this Administrations “problems”… I didn’t make them stupid!! —– And are you saying you don’t have a problem with those topics I brought up??
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | October 4, 2011, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Bank of America is seeing now red. LOL
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | October 4, 2011, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
To wantingbalance: While I agree with your thought that BofA’s failure would cause financial havoc in this country, i.e. too big to fail; do you think BofA’s recent announcement of a potential lay off of up to 30,000 employees is going to HELP the economy? Major corporations of this country need to revamp their thinking on cost savings measures, as mass lay offs only exacerbate this country’s economic problems. Instead of mass lay offs, how about salary cuts across the board to avoid significant jumps in unemployment? Perhaps the top brass can take a 20% pay cut with no bonus, and the worker bee employees could take a 10% to 15% pay cut, with the lowest cuts going to lower pay personnel. I doubt company employees would object to pay cuts versus having themselves or their co-workers being fired. The key is cutting from the top down, with the highest cuts going to those who can most afford it.
Posted by: RohnertPark1 | October 4, 2011, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Anything a bank does is because of a regulation placed on them by Congress. I am not for the Banks, but most if not all the comments on this site are childish and not technically correct. But what the hell, this is ABC News, another liberal misinformation spindoctor.
Posted by: Mike8384 | October 4, 2011, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
I don’t agree with the teenager thing, but 30 years in IT tells me their most likely being hacked (DOS)
Posted by: Rich | October 4, 2011, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
samhiguchi …I’ve been trying to make this group understand that the current BOA “reaction” is to a regulation issued by a non-elected, quasi federal agency whose primary accomplishment has been the continual devaluation of our money. Yet everyone insists on jumping on the victim, probably because the victim (big business, big banks, etc) are so easy to identify and the ones who committed the crime are the first to blame the victim. Hate BOA because of its sloppy management and poor customer service. I’ve had that with Wells Fargo, Chase and Citi as well as with three credit unions. But remember, its our money in the banks, not theirs (that also means the crooks in Washington) and if we want them to keep it, we have to pay something. Credit Unions use our deposits to loan to others and pay us back with what we pay in interest. The larger the Credit Union the more likely it is to act like BOA.
Posted by: wantingbalance | October 4, 2011, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
II’m moving my money to (MOA) Mattress Of America
Posted by: Rich | October 4, 2011, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Screw Bank of America. They never know what the hell is going on.
Posted by: JamesOnly | October 4, 2011, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
The author of this article really needs to check the facts before posting so quickly. First of all, BOA will waive the fee for Premium customers, BUT those customers must “Maintain a combined balance of $20,000 or more in linked personal deposit accounts with Bank of America and/or eligible linked investment accounts.” Second, this Premium account is only available in the states of Mass, Arizona, and Georgia. Everyone else can have it waived with an ADVANTAGE account, which would waive the debit card fee if Maintain a $10,000 combined deposits balance (checking with linked savings, CDs, IRAs) or just $5,000 in a linked checking and Regular Savings account
OR
Have a $15,000 outstanding balance on a linked Installment Loan, or Line of Credit, or any balance on a linked first mortgage
OR
Maintain $15,000 in combined assets in linked brokerage accounts.
Perhaps the author was too busy trying to type as much terrible jargon and internet rumors before actually doing the research on the accounts…
i
Posted by: Bill Teller | October 4, 2011, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Anyone who does not or can not maintain a $5000.00 balance should pull their money out of B of A
and put it somewhere where they will be appreciated for their deposit and business.
Posted by: Kay | October 4, 2011, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Think BofA has gotten the message yet? Probably not. Customers should leave this bank in droves. The customer IS ALWAYS RIGHT. The customers are YELLING “NO FEE”. BofA is rich enough. Another rip off of the working public to line the pockets of the rich.
Posted by: Buddy Gold | October 4, 2011, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Region has also started a so called account fee of $5 & if u don’t get direct deposit the fee can go up to atleast $15!!!
Posted by: Carisa | October 4, 2011, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
What I’ll say on this, is that over 10 years ago, Nations Bank (incidently an institution I was happy to see go away) by the name of Nations Bank, incured the wraith of a certain community in Albuquerque, NM. This one branch had 20 teller stations, and on a Friday afternoon, when people’s pay checks came inm, only TWO were open. The line at the teller station was so long, it went out to the door, and continued to the street. If one needed account service, it was sign in at the book, and the wait time was many times 2.5 hours or more. It was third only to the financial aid office at the colleges nearby, and the DMV office, back when it was in Coronado mall where it was take a number, and spend a day getting through.
In addition to this, Nation’s bank was notorious not only for fees, but for even justifying one fee by another. For instance if one didn’t have the money for an account balance fee, they’d take that, and then lob an overdraft on top of it; or if one used the ATM, withdrew money and had $2.25 left in the account, they’d lob you with a $25 overdraft fee, which leaves the account -$22.50. Ask them how the account could be overdrawn AFTER the fee is applied, so that the resulting overdraft is LESS THEN THE FEE ITSELF, and they’d draw a blank, then go into some lame arse excuse on how “well now it’s overdrawn” without bothering to account how based on the balance sheet it NEVER WAS before the fee was lobbed on.
Well they annoyed the customers enough, that before Nation’s Bank disappeared out of the town, the branch which had the worst record for this, got egged one Sunday morning. And it was in the news too, and you can imagine the local headlines, as like the worst offender for customer service (outside DMV) got egged. They didn’t remain in business much longer, though a little digging, they were bought up by Bank of America. Little surprises me that they should get this rep, considering that, though that buyup took place a long time ago relatively speaking (about 1 decade).
And as to their balances, they are nuts. Take the $1,500 minimum balance on my access checking. True a direct deposit of $250 a month or more can waive this, but honestly. Who, in their right mind, would leave $1,500 in this account, even if they had it, when that money could give them some return in a CD or money market account. Competitors would offer interest checking for that balance. This, is just not a good deal for the customer, even if one has the money. People with money, don’t want to go leaving it, where it can work for the bank (as they make money off lending it out, several times over due to fractional reserve banking), but without a return, the money isn’t going to work for the account holder. The idea of a checking account, certainly non-interest baring, is to handle one’s day to day expenses. It is NOT an investment account, which is where people would rather have their money sit.
Posted by: Nuadormrac | October 4, 2011, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
HA! I got a call today from B of A. I said hello many times. No reply. I hung up. Checked my email a little after this…. there it was….. an email saying my debit card had been used and they were looking into it and I needed to call them. I called the number on the back of my card. Sure enough there had been a charge of over 266 dollars for “C-Town” in Bronx, NY. It was deducted from my account and then added back in. They asked if I had tried to use the card or if I had allowed anyone to use it. I said UH NO… I am in Florida and have been all day and I know no one in Bronx, NY…. and don’t know what “C-Town” is either…. and have my card with my photo on it in my hand as we speak. He said that it would be covered at 100% back to my account. He saId the card had been rejected…. just very odd to me! Said they were stopping my card use and would be mailing out another one to me. THEN, a few hours later, my husband heard that B of A was having trouble with their website. WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON HERE???
Posted by: Florida | October 4, 2011, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
To me it is either a sign of something hurting , going to hurt in the near future or that they are in great financial turmoil and present pain and trying to mend or cover something……how insane for a top paid and well bonused CEO to approve something like this in such troubled times? U.S. Bank is rock solid , they are a good bank, i don`t believe they bought up thousands of BAD mortgages hoping to make a buck off of quantity low sell profits………perhaps this may be the feelings Occupy Wall street has , banks have done this to themselves, they got tax payers bailouts for a specific purpose then refused to do with that money what they ought to have done.That money should have helped people extend out and stay in their homes instead of faced forclosure and the horrible debts the banks face keeping maintained un-occupied empty real estate…….it`s all just sitting there rusting into the ground and that $5 fee is to help maintain…..once again someone being made to hold these giant financial institutions up off the ground. Solyndra and the big Bank loans in the dawning age of Americas fall…….. We owe China 1.6 Trillion dollars.
Posted by: NewUnion | October 5, 2011, 4:29 am 4:29 am
GoooOooood! I hope BofA pays dearly for thanking the folks who bailed them out with usury % rates and fees galore!
Posted by: sybase46 | October 5, 2011, 5:49 am 5:49 am
Perhaps their site is down because they scuttled it to avoid the angry backlash for their greed!
Posted by: Eileen Buckley | October 5, 2011, 7:43 am 7:43 am
My mortgage has been with another bank for at least two years. I still keep getting emails and correspondence from BofA discussing my open mortgage account. They deserve to go under.
Posted by: mjinmd | October 5, 2011, 9:48 am 9:48 am
For the fools wishing that it is a hacking attack, just remember, it’s not the bank they’re hurting, it’s their customers who are trying to access their accounts and pay bills they are hurting. Can you be any more stupid or shallow minded?
Posted by: TJ | October 5, 2011, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Interesting – I just tried to login to my online credit card account and was told that that, after 5 years of paying online, that “online account access is not available for this account – please call 800-xxx-xxxx”. SO I call the number and they tell me my account has been closed. Since I pay off my balance every month and never closed it myself, I inquired why this was the case. I was told that a merchant where I used the card had reported my account may have been compromised. However, I can still use my credit card – just can’t login to pay my bill, see my balance, etc. Doesn’t this seem backwards to anyone? If my account has been compromised, shouldn’t my card be null and void, but still be able to access online to pay my bill? This smells…Something is going on with their website…I’m beginning to believed they *have* been hacked and I’m being fed a line.
Posted by: Mark | October 7, 2011, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Really clean and fantastic user friendly style and design. FYI: Hugohosting-dot-com – Free Webhosting. Earn up to $25 by refer to other.
Posted by: Johnathon Helle | October 9, 2011, 1:08 am 1:08 am
I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN PROUD TO BE A BOA CUSTOMER TILL NOW. I LIVE ON
$674 A MONTH, AND PAY ALL MY BILLS ONLINE, AND MY MONEY IS GONE VERY QUICKLY AS IT IS.I TRY TO MAKE IT STRETCH AS IT IS, NOW THEY WANT TO TAKE $5 THAT IS NOTHING TO THEM, BUT A LITTLE MORE GAS TO GET ME TO MY DRS APPOINTS.I AM ON DISABILITY. THANKS BOA FOR ALL MY TRUST IN YOU.I’M FORCED TO LOOK FOR ANOTHER BANK.
Posted by: FREEDOM | October 12, 2011, 11:54 am 11:54 am
From the Bank Of America started the economic crises in the first place. They will implement chips to keep us under control. Where will this world go?
Posted by: meditation | October 13, 2011, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Obama walked in front of the tv cams on Thursday in order to announce what had essentially been really pre-ordained ahead of when he had taken function, that every one American soldiers may very well be departing from Irak ahead of the ending of this year.
Posted by: zaręczyny | October 25, 2011, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
@free_2_choose;
NO… a teenager with a home PC cannot take down Bank of America’s website via denial of service. Sorry.
As for Steve Gibson being an internet security expert, he holds NO security certificates and is only known in the security circle as an alarmist who spread FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt).
Steve Gibson is only claim to fame is writing Spinrite in assembly in the 80′s and early 90′s.
Posted by: free_2_disagree | October 30, 2011, 3:11 am 3:11 am