Fed Loaned Banks Trillions in Bailout, Bloomberg Reports
In a story that sheds new light on the extent of the country’s financial crisis, Bloomberg Markets magazine reported today that the Federal Reserve lent trillions of dollars to beleaguered financial institutions, with $1.2 trillion going out on just one day in 2008.
“The Fed didn’t tell anyone which banks were in trouble so deep they required a combined $1.2 trillion on Dec. 5, 2008, their single neediest day. Bankers didn’t mention that they took tens of billions of dollars in emergency loans at the same time they were assuring investors their firms were healthy,” Bloomberg reported today. ”And no one calculated until now that banks reaped an estimated $13 billion of income by taking advantage of the Fed’s below-market rates.”
Bloomberg Markets said it went over 29,000 pages of Fed documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and central bank records of more than 21,000 transactions.
“Saved by the bailout, bankers lobbied against government regulations, a job made easier by the Fed, which never disclosed the details of the rescue to lawmakers even as Congress doled out more money and debated new rules aimed at preventing the next collapse,” Bloomberg reported.
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke had argued back in 2008 when the crisis hit that revealing borrower details would create a stigma that would have led to more banks collapsing. And the Fed fought to keep the details of the loans, which totaled $7.77 trillion, secret long after.
-
Email
Apple Factories: An Exclusive Look
Gas Prices Rising: What Can White House Do? 




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
7.7 trillion, wow that was worth the money, do you all realize they could have just written every federal income taxpayer a check for $50,000.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | November 28, 2011, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Amazing,
And then they have the gall to raise fees. Of course they have a right to make a REASONABLE profit but that’s not good enough. They have to make obscene profits on our backs.
This is why I don’t agree with the tea party at all – they actually want to reduce oversight and regulation. That’s basically what happened under Bush – it was a free for all – and look where it got us. And lest someone call me a liberal I will concede that the Democrats are no better now as they seem to be owned by corporate interests lock stock and barrel.
Therein lies the problem folks – working people have virtually no one representing their interests. We are just pawns in their little game.
Posted by: al100 | November 28, 2011, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Posted by: al100–Life is a contact sport, investing is a contact sport, There are lots of working people, they need to look out for their own interests, because no one will do it for them.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | November 28, 2011, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Those same working people can also choose to vote for someone that isn’t spoon fed to them through the media. Of Course they choose not to.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | November 28, 2011, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Secret bank dealings within government and within the Fed. Surprised by this corruption? I’m not. The grand American EXPERIMENT in government has failed and is imploding. Only the criminal bureaucrats deny that because they fear the loss of their criminal public pensions.
Posted by: Jack D. | November 28, 2011, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
At those amounts per day, the banks could pay off the US deficit and not feel it! While congress argues about 1 or 2 trillion in cuts over ten years!
We have been sold down the river by the plutocracy.
Posted by: martin braun | November 28, 2011, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
And they got there nerve not to loan people money when they need it most. We are almost going under and not far from it. Thank-You my Government
Posted by: F.K. | November 28, 2011, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
It is a disgrace that the US govt took OUR money and gave it to these banks, who are now making life very difficult and are still affecting our economy in a negative way. When will Congress realize that it is OUR money, not theirs. Had they given every taxpayer a share of that money, the economy would have been on the rise because the money would have been spent. Instead they have given it to banks, car makers, etc. who keep the money for themselves and still screw the American public. Don’t vote for any incumbents, they are all huge failures!!!!
Posted by: Wondering | November 28, 2011, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Welfare for the rich baby! FOUR MORE YEARS!!! Get your absentee ballot now and give the corporate welfare queen another term Yeaaah BOYYY!! Bama ’15, Bama ’12!!!
Posted by: Hell Yeah! | November 28, 2011, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Worse was the fact that these banks were not required to use the money to loan out for businesses to maybe hire or improve themselves, to modify loans for people whose mortgages were more than the value of the home because of the shady dealings of the realtors/mortgage companies/banks/Wall Street. Nope, they used it to give themselves huge bonuses and enrich themselves. I am guessing this $7.7trillion is part of the huge deficit the Republicans blame on Obama but is increasingly proving to have come about long before he walked into office. Bernanke and Paulsen sold COngress a bill of goods ["too big to fail"] and then laughed at us, the people.
Posted by: pksk531 | November 28, 2011, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Keep in mind that the Obama administration took office 20 January 2009. Most of these loans occured under the Bush 43 administration.
Posted by: Greggw | November 28, 2011, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
This is all Obamas doings. He was robbing the treasury he was. Thank goodness the Tea Party is keeping him in check now.
Posted by: Mrs Conclusion | November 28, 2011, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
My question is What did these banks show for security to get these loans. I think I already know. Could it be the Toxic Liabilities of the Mortgage meltdown magically turned into Assets? Poof you have 7.77 Trillion Dollars. Also how About the strong arming of those same banks to acquisition toxic smaller banks and holding companies that held the derivatives. Like B of A taking over of Meryl Lynch and Wells Fargo buying Wachovia? Scores of other deals sculpted by Bernankey, Paulson and then President of the New York Fed Giethner.
Posted by: Michael therrien | November 28, 2011, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
This did happen under Bush but when Obama took office it was his dutyas the leader of this nation to know this and bring to our attention and he also choose not to and forked out more money to them..And lets not forget he got big contibutions from them..After all he was the one who promised no more secrets remember..Transparancy within congress?
Posted by: jack | November 28, 2011, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
@Mrs Conclusion Try reading it again. The part with the date.like Dec 5, 2008. Bush was President, not Obama. That’s what I love about you Tea Party people even with facts staring you in the face you still can’t see them. You are so blinded by hatred that you will vote for the same politicians who want no regulations and no oversite of our financial institutions that caused this mess that you now blame on Obama.
Posted by: dezignz | November 28, 2011, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
I know there are Obama haters on here who will jump right on him. WHY? If you have any brains you will see he took office in Jan. TWO THOUSAND AND NINE. This ALL took place in TWO THOUSAND EIGHT. Now who was in office then? Everyone together: BUSH.
P.S. Remember the Savings and Loan Scandal? Neil BUSH.
Posted by: Barb | November 28, 2011, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Obama was in office and he had received $116 Million just to elected – this is something that Obama caused and probably promised —
Posted by: Sci | November 28, 2011, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Do the Math 7.7trillion
Total Value of all Housing Units in the US now exceeds $20 Trillion
——————————————————————————–
According to the 2006 Census Bureau American Factfinder
Community Survey
Regions
Northeast $4.373 Trillion
Midwest $3.495 Trillion
South $5.891 Trillion
West $6.549 Trillion
now find total value of US forclosures since 2007. Ooops we have problem Houston, the numbers, are off. Did a third of the households in America go belly-up? Has 1/3 of your neighborhood disappeared? Something’s rotten in Denmark, folks.
Posted by: JohnB | November 28, 2011, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
total joke.
They wonder why the dollar is worthless.
They print money and make your money worth less.
It’s grand theft!
Posted by: bob | November 28, 2011, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
GreggW….2008 was still Bush’ watch. You’re wrong on who bailed out the financial insitutions – that was Bush. Obama did the auto industry
Posted by: Mary | November 28, 2011, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Bush or Obama, it does not matter, what you all seem to forget is that Congress controls the purse strings not the Presidents. Put the blame where it belongs, CONGRESS! Vote them all out and put people in who represent the people and not their wallets.
Posted by: michealeb | November 28, 2011, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
And you’ll STILL see the clueless backers of the RIGHT insisting that EVERYTHING wrong is President Obama’s fault which is FALSE.
Posted by: demNme5 | November 28, 2011, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Hey poster Hell Yeah! better bring out your History books…. mmmmmmm who was President in 2008 again???????? Lets see that would be GW Bush, Obama was not in office when the great Bank bail out started……….. Nothing like creating your own history since you do not like the one we have now huh……???????
Posted by: Cal | November 28, 2011, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Obama was elected in Nov – don’t tell me that he didn’t make promises – it’s been downhill since then – I can think intuitively and factually – both tell me that Obama did us in — neither Bush caused this Obama did wilt he feathered his nest – we are how many trillion in debt now? Criminals and secrecy is what we have with Obama – everything he said was a lie – transparency – yeah right – coverup! The radicals continue to reach back to blame someone else – I didn’t vote for Obama you did or maybe not as many people as they say – it could have been rigged – look at the ACORN mess.
Posted by: Sci | November 28, 2011, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Nothing like creating your own history huh Republicans when you do not like the out come, GW start the great bank bail out with out requiring them to pay it back……. ALL IN 2008 once Obama was Sworn it he made sure the banks were on the hook to pay the American people back….. now to find out the Republicans gave a trillion dollar gift to the banks with out telling the American people?????? Dirty dirty dirty
Posted by: Syndy | November 28, 2011, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Posted by: Mary | November 28, 2011, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
GreggW….2008 was still Bush’ watch. You’re wrong on who bailed out the financial insitutions – that was Bush. ************************ That’s what I said. Obama took office 20 January 2009. Most of the bank loans took place during the Bush administration.
Posted by: Greggw | November 28, 2011, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
SCI….did you miss the 8 years of the Bush/Cheney reign? Seems you blame everything wrong in this country on Obama. I blame everyone who has been at the White House in the past 20 years – ALL of them.
Posted by: Mary | November 28, 2011, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
GreggW…my apologies I must have transposed your words (I do it with numbers too sadly). I apologize
Posted by: Mary | November 28, 2011, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Cal, Demneme, and other reasonable posters: See how no matter what they will twist things to blame Pres. Obama. Oh he started this in Nov. when he was elected…No matter Bush was in charge then and Pres. Obama couldn’t have made any deals with the banks. They also forget about Neal Bush. They forget about the Iraq War…they forget about a lot of things. No Pres. Obama is not perfect, but I will take him any day, esp. over the circus that is running on the right now. Gingrich? Bauchman? Romney (who has the same health plan as Pres. Obama), this is the CREAM of the crop for the GOP/Tea Party. God help us all.
Posted by: Barb | November 28, 2011, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
The headline should have contained the word – -”Secret”. That would have grabbed a ton of attention from a lot more people!
Posted by: Smukers | November 28, 2011, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Its the Republican way!
Posted by: greedywaterrabbitt | November 28, 2011, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
“If you have any brains you will see he took office in Jan. TWO THOUSAND AND NINE. This ALL took place in TWO THOUSAND EIGHT. Now who was in office then? Everyone together: BUSH.” The FED made the loans to save the banks, so who was president at the time was irrelevant, and these were LOANS, not handouts, which the banks have repaid or have been paying back. The election was over so President-elect Obama would be moving in the following month. Does even the left actually believe that he was not briefed on the situation prior to his inauguration or not made aware of it immediately afterwards? Any reason why he quiet about it for so long?
Posted by: MyTake | November 28, 2011, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
When is Bernake going to be arrested …and Corzine, and Raines and Rangel and Frank and Geithner and…?
When are we going to arrest all the lobbyists – foreign and domestic- who pay the stooges in Washington to impersonate congressmen?
When are we going to round them all up for one huge Perp Walk?
When are we going to re-implement financial safeguards and require regulators to do their jobs? And then reform election and campaign finance laws?
Only when that happens will Capitol Hill get back its dignity, its moral authority to lead and its respect from the American people…until then they are illegitimate tyrants, no better than the Russian Oligarchy.
Posted by: Hillbilly | November 28, 2011, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
We must reform the banking system to prevent fraud and manipulation. Restore the Glass-Steagall Act – the Depression-era law, done away with by President Clinton, that separates investment banks from commercial banks. This law would correct the conditions for the recent crisis, as investment banks could not take risks for profit that create kale derivatives out of thin air, and wipe out the commercial and savings banks.
Posted by: Maud'Dib | November 28, 2011, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
This article should have stated how much got paid back to the government.
Posted by: Lydia | November 28, 2011, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Ronnie (boy) Reagan turned this Government into a Fascist run Government 32 years ago. I saw him giving a speech one time, with one of the corporate ceo’s of Merrill Lynch standing next to Reagan, dictating to him, what to say. Reagan’s kids had nothing to do with him for over 20 years, because of his rotten politics. With the taxes the now tech world has generated for Government use, there is now more to dip into & the quest for power that it has also generated, has contributed to the greed we see. But one thing everyone on here needs to think about, is this, How corrupt are you. You can’t expect your Government to be honest, if you are not! We all are a reflection of our society, aren’t we? The only thing that will prevent corruption is to put lawful restrictions on politicians & make them answer for every decision that they make & include the citizens of this country in the decision making process. It would be called, forced accountability on everyone part in this country!
Posted by: Wes E | November 28, 2011, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
We need to know how much these banks paid back (with interest or not) to us, the hard working people of USA, the $7.77 Trillion Dollars. Pending that answer, we need to see people responsible for such pillaging of our money entrusted to the Federal Gov penalized financially and paid back with much interest via prison time.
Posted by: Remo | November 28, 2011, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Bartender…give me another beer–I want to catch-up with all these people venting their views-noboby is making sense. They are all DRUNKED-UP
Posted by: Bill Davis | November 28, 2011, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
while you partisan idiots bicker dem. against rep., you miss the fact that party politics are a front for the true rulers, e.g., the rockefellers, morgans, etc. who set up a PRIVATE company, permitted to print your money, are pulling all the strings.
END the FED
quantitative easing= print more money. makes YOUR money worth less. We need to get back to a substantiated currency system, tied to something of value, such as gold , etc.
END THE FED!!!
Posted by: spitting into the wind | November 28, 2011, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Wow, how far does this really go and by that I mean how far into government, how many crooks are involved. It’s funny because during this mess how many times in small talk did me and other people say the same thing, why aren’t they giving the money to the largest portion of the economy, the 70% that control the economy. They are all crooks and have taken away who knows how much of our hard earned money and we have little we can do about it. The crooks stealing from the crooks who are stealing from us.
Posted by: cheeksforus | November 28, 2011, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
$13 billion of income by taking advantage of the Fed’s below-market rates.
The Government needs to charge the banks back for this and make regulations which force the Banks to lend funds to business’s who create jobs that pay taxes which will change the economy in a positive direction for the future. The Banks make money by charging fees especially when they issue Debit Charge Cards which cover a gas fill up and then hit you with $35 overdraft fees. Then they give themselves bonuses on top of this highway robbery. We should of let the banks fail and let the market create financial institutions which promote saving and lend from this base as it was in the past. They need to make it illegal for banks to lobby or support political candidates as they have blackmailed the system and should be put in jail just as if someone robbed them in a hold up. This stuff makes me sick to my stomach when so many human beings are living well below the poverty level.
Posted by: Ken Sull | November 28, 2011, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
There is NO SUCH THING AS GOVERNMENT MONEY. It is all TAXPAYER DOLLARS. Americans must demand transparency in the dispersion of these funds with the rarest of exceptions and all those exceptions should be subject to citizen review.
Posted by: Mogg | November 28, 2011, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Almost half of the top 30 borrowers were foreign banks (bank of Scotland borrowed $84.5 billion and USB AG borrowed $77.2 billion). Most of the secret loans had to be sought via the Freedom of Information Act and then pursued in court. Bloomberg says the big banks fought release of this data under FOIA all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The High Court declined to intervene in March, 2011.
Posted by: Stagecoach13 | November 28, 2011, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Loan… do you not understand what that word is? they paid and/or are paying back the money that was loaned to them. What do you think would have happened had the banks closed their doors? does no one study history anymore? its not just the investments that they do but they hold the money for the companies that are your employers. They close the doors because they go bancrupt and your employer has no money to pay you because it is GONE. Same with anyone who had a personal and saving account in those banks. That is why they are too big to fail… too many companies keep their money in the larger banks.
Again.. Loans. Look up the word.
Posted by: Tseirpa | November 28, 2011, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
This is news? Maybe the total profit gained has been newly computed, but the list of banks taking assistance was printed long, long ago. The list was enormous and kind of interesting to see some of the banks that had absolutely no need to do so, doing so. It made you wonder for a couple of minutes, but then you kind of wondered why you weren’t eligible, too.
Posted by: reubenr | November 28, 2011, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
If these were loans, then how much profit did the FED make? And exactly WHO got the profits???
Posted by: Jay | November 28, 2011, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Well, it is the power of printing money and dishing it the way “you” like. This is what triggers wars, civil wars, coups, election scams etc. When it comes to power and money, all forms of governments, whether it is democracy, communism, fascism, aristocracy and tyranny, reduce to the same. One shall have no illusions about it as it is the way the human history was, is and will be.
Posted by: commongood | November 28, 2011, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
The infamous “Military-Industrial Complex” has been replaced by the much worse “Fed Reserve-Banking Industry Complex”.
Posted by: TeaPartyNation | November 28, 2011, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
How do I get on this gravy train???
Posted by: Jill | November 28, 2011, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
I remember reading an article not long after the bailouts about how an admin, or someone like that leaked info about one of the executives using bailout money to re-decorate his office, and it listed each item and what it cost, for example $1,000 for a trash can, etc… How come there wasn’t any checks and balances in place to make sure the money was used appropriately! OUR money went to things like re-decorating someone’s office!!!???? And on a similar subject, the money that Solyndra (Fremont, CA) received from the government… funny how all the executives gave themselves big bonuses shortly before announcing that the company was filing for bankruptcy and laying everyone off. Again, why isn’t someone in charge of watching to make sure the money is used appropriately!!! How many times does this have to happen before they learn??? Processes and check & balances should be set for when money is given to corporations. Just like how the Sarbanes-Oxley Act came about because of the Enron scandal.
Posted by: CJ | November 28, 2011, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
I too would like to know how much interest they are being charged for the use of MY MONEY According to one post $50,000 of my money was lent to them. I plan to send the bank Morgan Chase a bill charging them 21% interest, on their loan from me (actually it probably should be higher because their credit score can’t be that good). If they don’t pay I plan to report them to D&B with enough bad reports it should put them under. I would be willing to negotiate a lower interest rate if they fire their boards without additonal monies and/or umbrellas. If the boards don’t like it take us (the bank) to court we should be able to tied them up for years and of course we could get the fed auditors to check the books. Now that is what I call free enterprise, capitalism at work. You can’t do your job, you get fired not a raise. Why do we subsidise corporations auto, tobacco, railways, banks, defense corp and it is ok. Yet it is called entitlement programs when it is for those who make less than $500,000, even when I contributed money to my entitlement.
Posted by: dadmiller | November 28, 2011, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
TO ALL THE IDIOTS BLAMING THIS ON BUSH…If you READ the article, they were referring to one specific day the feds bailed out the banks. But the democratic congress decided to bailout those companies, NOT BUSH. Then Obama did exactly what democrats do best; that’s interfere with the free market and print money. Obama and congress should have let the banks and auto industry fail. (by the way, not saying Bush is any better. Just hate when democrats won’t take any responsibility like usual)
Posted by: Eric | November 28, 2011, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Hello! Obama WAS NOT IN OFFICE when this happened! BUSH was in office then. As I understand the article, the Fed did not disclose any of this info to Congress.
Posted by: EarlGrayHot | November 29, 2011, 8:52 am 8:52 am
RE; SCi and ERIC:
Since you apparnetly do not know the history line for the bank bailout, here is the date: On October 3, 2008, the Senate passed the $700 billion bank bailout bill. The guts of the bill was the same as the three page document submitted on September 21, 2008, by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. The bill was signed by Bushm not Obama since Obama was not elected until Nov 2008 and sworn in office in 2009. He could not have signed the bill because he was not the
President. They have a name for people who refuse to face the truth that’s presented to them!
Posted by: Doug Carey | November 29, 2011, 10:46 am 10:46 am
@ERIC: You’re picking sound bites and not facing the facts. 7.7 trillion was authorized in Oct 2008 by BUSH! On one (1) particular day in Dec 2008, 1.2 trillion of the 7.7 trillion was given to the banks. The plan was an agreement between the Feds and the Banks that they (The Banks) would “LOAN” the money to business’s and the public,hence no regulations were put because the banks would not agree to the deal. After teh banks got the loan, they reneged on their agreement and proceeding to fatten themselves. Now the Repubs want to believe that these same “LIARS” can not help create jobs if they have to pay more taxes? When will you learn that rich people do not create jobs or spend to help the economy! Rich people take their money and invest it to make more money. Stop and think about it: If you make $1mil a year for the past 10-12years, how much of that $1mil are you going to actual spend to live off of? You already have everything you need (or should) off of $1mil/yr, probably using every tax loop hole to avoid paying your fair share, hiding money in overseas accounts, getting campaign contributions (which you don’t have to declare where they are coming from) and getting under the table kickbacks. Now, would you REALLY be spending all that money or investing it?? Wake up and smell the rose’s! Everyone that kiss’s you, don’t necessarily love you! And the repubs are leaving their lipstick on a lot of people while they continue carrying their money to the bank.
Posted by: Doug Carey | November 29, 2011, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Hello? How is this Obama’s fault? He did not take office until 2009. Someone explain this to me, please?
Posted by: JJ | November 29, 2011, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
The real question is what can we do about it?
Posted by: The dude | November 29, 2011, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Vote Ron Paul!! The only who has not sold himself to the special interest groups.
Posted by: Jules | November 30, 2011, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
OK, Dems, Reps, lets start the chant: USA! USA! USA! Approval of Congress: 11%. Incumbent re-election rate: 90+%. We, the voters and non-voters are to blame.
Posted by: UncleSam | December 2, 2011, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
The Federal Reserve is Global now. Its a Private Bank owned by those familiar families and royal houses. If it loaned out 7.7 trillion, then it must have 77 trillion in debt notes which what money is. This means the economy is about to rebound without inflation, although one might think otherwise.
Posted by: Prisoner 6 | December 2, 2011, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Yes many banks made terrible decisions that led to the crisis and as financial professionals should have known better but remember it also took lax governmental regulation and idealism driven policies to support home ownership including encouraging banks to lessen underwriting standards. Do not forget government support and encouragement of Fannie Mae to buy up garbage mortgages from banks thereby encouraging them to make even more stupid loans. Oh do not forget the throngs of Americans who in their own greed and lust for money took out loans they could not afford and now blame banks wholly. Dont forget that the Fed got almost all its money back from TARP as well as the short term loans mentioned in this article. Fact is had they not received tbose funds many of us would be in way worse shape. Not fair but it was a necessary evil. We should be mad at a lot of stuff.
Posted by: Erik | December 2, 2011, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
You know teabaggers and EmoProgs are desperate when they start invoking ACORN amidst revealing their hatred for Obama either way.
Go to Factcheck.org where you will see lies about ACORN have already been debunked long since.
And by the way, President Obama was INAUGURATED in 2009, and barely began implementing his policies long enough for them to take affect.
Just a little fact I felt needed sharing.
Posted by: leebeegee | December 4, 2011, 8:59 am 8:59 am
HEY JULES. NO ONE WANTS TO VOTE FOR STORMFRONT.ORG’S LEADING MAN OKAY? THANKS BUT NO THANKS. NO ONE LIKES A BIGOT THESE DAYS. ;)
Posted by: leebeegee | December 4, 2011, 9:09 am 9:09 am
To Everybody Blaming Bush or Obama: NEITHER of them were responsible for this–the Federal Reserve made those loans, and the Federal Reserve is NOT part of the US Government. It’s a private institution that works WITH the US Treasury, but not for it. The Fed answers to nobody but itself. Congress won’t even pass a bill to just AUDIT the Fed–there’s no way they (or the Executive Branch) control it.
It is abundantly clear that the average American has no idea how the Fed and the federal government interact. Do yourself a favor and do some research–there’s plenty online. Or read Ron Paul’s book, “End the Fed”. There are some serious shenanigans going on because of central banking (i.e. the Fed and it’s international counterparts), and you should try to have some idea of what the heck is going on. This is a wake-up call. Don’t hit the snooze button again.
Posted by: Dave 260 | December 5, 2011, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm