Worker Fired After Robbed at Gunpoint
Douglas Moore, a former Massachusetts convenience store worker, had a double shot of traumatic events last month when he was fired by his employer just one day after getting robbed at gunpoint while on the job.
Moore, 24, was working the cash register on the evening of Dec. 22 at a Cumberland Farms convenience store in Ludlow, Mass., when a gun-wielding thief entered and stole $100 to $150, he said. The next day, he was fired for having too much money in the cash register, he told television station WGGB in Springfield. The company policy only allows a maximum of $75 to be kept in a register for safety reasons, and the rest must be stored in a safe.
“It was actually very busy,” Moore told WGGB, describing why he did not put the money in the safe. “People were buying lottery, gift cards, so it was hard to keep track of the drawer and do all my other responsibilities.”
Cumberland Farms, based in Framingham, Mass., defended the move to discharge Moore, saying the company did not take the decision lightly, nor was he terminated because he was a victim of a robbery or because the company suffered a financial loss from it.
“Due to a desire to maintain employee privacy, the facts surrounding his termination must remain private; however, the policy that limits the amount of money that can be held in the register is ONLY there to provide a safer environment, as well as to act as a deterrent to crime,” Cumberland Farms spokeswoman Carin Warner responded with a statement.
Douglas, who is putting himself through school, had worked at the Ludlow store for about two years, earning less than $9 an hour, The Republican newspaper in Springfield reported. He worked between 36 and 40 hours a week, WGGB reported. Moore did not return a cal from ABC News for comment.
“Just as we have done in this instance, we review all similar policy violations in our attempt to determine if an exception to employee discharge can be made,” Warner continued in the statement. “However, these policies must be close to zero tolerance given the potentially significant safety risks and our need to emphasize the importance of adhering to a practice that we have determined through 70 years of experience, will keep our employees and customers safe. Unfortunately, the facts in this case, even after thorough review, could not allow for an exception. As is always the case in these rare circumstances, crisis counseling was offered to Mr. Moore.”
The Ludlow police told said the robbery suspect may be a “light-skinned man, possibly Hispanic,” around 5½ feet tall. He wore a gray hooded sweatshirt and blue jeans and had a large, revolver-style handgun. He demanded cash from the register, then fled the scene in a dark Pontiac Grand Prix.

Email
Memorial Day Deals
Man Charged in Deposit Error Spending Spree 




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Please please please proofread your articles. I know mistakes are made occasionally however, I think people expect more from a national publication such as ABC News. Go Packers.
Posted by: Jake The Magnificent | January 11, 2012, 7:40 am 7:40 am
Interesting…. My gut reaction is to take the employee’s account more into consideration here. Although, I’m an employer, really carefully worded/constructed/legalese press releases always causes me to raise an eyebrow. The Comany’s statement insinuates that there could have been other reasons for dismissal–but due to privacy they can’t discuss it. Uh-huh… Yet, this young man worked for the Company for nearly two years on a full-time basis. There’s something else here. I don’t think the Company would just fire due to a loss of just $75 either. So…
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | January 11, 2012, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Mr. Moore, you were wronged by this company. Apparently there are no managerial/supervisory employees at this company who have ever worked a late shift 2 days before Christmas. I hope you find another job soon.
Posted by: ocmarsha | January 11, 2012, 10:19 am 10:19 am
By the way Jake the Magnificent, your grammar complaints would be more effective if you contacted the editors from ABC as described in the “Leave a Reply” area.
Posted by: ocmarsha | January 11, 2012, 10:22 am 10:22 am
The fact that he worked there on a full time basis for 2 years, and it was a few days before Christmas, and he was ROBBED at gunpoint… makes this company look extremely disloyal and unkind. Each of their employees need to take this situation as a true life example of what could happen to them. Carefully worded legal response from the company, and because they offered the young man counseling, that makes it all okay. I hope Occupy get wind of this… As a matter of fact, I think I’ll send them an email.
Posted by: Cheri Lynn | January 11, 2012, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Wait a minute!! How is it any different if there was 75$ or 150$ in the register…A gun pointed in your face is still a gun pointed in your face..it wont hurt any less. So how exactly does capping the limit make things more safe?
Posted by: Sunstone76 | January 11, 2012, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Does Romney own this store? I bet he gets a tingle in the pants reading this headline.
Posted by: cicclinton | January 11, 2012, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Cumberland axes people for even taking a medical leave. How about we about we all take a leave from them and Boycott Cumberland Farms.
Posted by: Gunther N | January 11, 2012, 10:42 am 10:42 am
The solution is obvious for Cumberland Farms employees – no matter how many people are in line or waiting to be helped, you take care of that money drawer first. Companies say they care about customer service, but policies like these make it seem unlikely.
Posted by: REALLY | January 11, 2012, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Really has it right. To heck with waiting on the customers. If you’re busy stop everything and do whatever is on their sheet. I have to wonder how smart it is to carry large wads of money out of a register in front of a group of people, but it’s policy. I’m sorry but sometimes life just doesn’t work like the corporate policy says it needs to. He was a two year employee so he couldn’t have been so bad that he needed to be fired two days before Christmas after a gun was shoved in his face.
Posted by: lexingtonlady | January 11, 2012, 11:07 am 11:07 am
I agree with Sunstone…. It doesn’t matter how much money was in the drawer. I worked at a bank and we had an amount to keep int the drawer but on a busy payday it was hard and you never unload a bunch of cash in front of customers!!!!!! Give me a break!!!!! It could of been $5 and he still would of been robbed!!!!! Shame on the company, this is whats wrong with our country. Your employees should be first.
Posted by: Lori | January 11, 2012, 11:21 am 11:21 am
I don’t care if it was just 3 bucks, a gun is a gun! There’s more going on here. What’s the deal with that legal verbage also? It seems to indicate there’s more going, that’s what.
I hope that fellow finds a new job soon with an employer that has some common sense!
Posted by: marilyn | January 11, 2012, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Better off leaving this garbage company … I will make a note never to spend another dime with them.
Posted by: yeah.i.said.it | January 11, 2012, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Note to all Cumberland employees: If you are robbed and going to lose your job anyway, offer to fill the robber’s tank, give them merchandise, and heck, the keys to the store. Call the police, report the robbery and walk out of the store right after the police leave. Make sure to leave a note that you quit. I don’t know about anyone else, but I’m planning to look up all Cumberland endeavors and boycott them. If jobs weren’t so tight, I would urge all the employees of that particular store quit on the same day. Let company spokesperson Carin Warner cover the shifts.
Posted by: Catherine | January 11, 2012, 11:45 am 11:45 am
I get that the kid broke the rules. I also get the reason for the rule – thieves are more likely to avoid places that don’t have much cash. What’s odd here is, the day he broke the rules on putting the cash away, was the same day he got robbed.
Posted by: Bill | January 11, 2012, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
“Let company spokesperson Carin Warner cover the shifts”
LOL!!! FUNNY!!! I see a lot of press releases issued by many companies daily because of my work but this one seemed to be a touch more “worked” over. It seems as if Legal stepped in here to sign-off on this PR. Its odd too that Mr. Moore has failed to contact ABCNews to comment. Either there is “something” more in his employee record (as the Company trys to insinuate)or he is busy trying to engage a lawyer. I read the linked article to this story and there is a lot of outrage over this in his community.
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | January 11, 2012, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
For me, this PR (because of its tone) reminds me particularly of the one issued by WalMart a few years ago when that young employee was trampled to death by maniac holiday shoppers as its doors opened.
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | January 11, 2012, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
The company says they have a $75 rule for safety reasons. Um, how many criminals know this policy? You really think a criminal looks at a Cumberland Farms KNOWING there should only be $75 in the cash drawer? That’s got to be the dumbest “Safety logic” I’ve seen in awhile….
Posted by: Working_Class | January 11, 2012, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
If the policy is written, then it must be enforced. Not following written policies could cause the employer more grief in the future however, never put your company in a box by a policy without some kind of leniency provision for infractions that could take into account individual circumstances. I would think a convenience store employee is not likely paid more than minimum wage and a good employee sticking around for two years is not all that easy to come by. If Mr. Moore is well liked in the community, they will surly voice their opinion via patronage. If there isn’t another underlying motive for the employer to fire him and the community stops shopping the store, I’d bet there is a good chance for a rehire.
Posted by: dan | January 11, 2012, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
“What’s odd here is, the day he broke the rules on putting the cash away, was the same day he got robbed.” _______________ Bill, as the story explained, the only reason Mr. Moore “broke the rules” was because the store was too busy with customers. As other posters have pointed out, it would be unseemly to haul out wads of cash in front of customers, not to mention neglecting customers to take care of everything on the boss’s checklist. It’s a shame that this young man had to suffer the robbery, but it’s a damn shame he lost his job because he had about $25-$50 dollars more in his drawer than he should have. I guess Cumberland Farms doesn’t put customer service first. Shame.
Posted by: MsT-Mac | January 11, 2012, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
The logic about safety makes no sense here. Hypothetically if the store posted a sign indicating the registers have no more than $75 in them the robber either didn’t see them or chose to ignore them so this would be a failure in their logic. On the other hand if the store didn’t post the signs then how can this rule result in better safety becuase the robber doesn’t know the rule?
Posted by: safetylogicalnonsensical | January 11, 2012, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
The robber only got $150 max. and the guy got fired, because he had too much money in the register. It doesn’t make sense. Say he put all but $75 in the safe, someone comes in buys something for $5 and gives him $100 bill how is he going to make change for that person or anyone else?
Posted by: anita | January 11, 2012, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
This “policy” isn’t about “safety” … which is a crock. And BTW, convenience store “thieves” are not smart enough to know or care how much cash is in the store … they rob it because it is “there” and they want money, usually for drugs … Shove your “mouthpieces” … your “reputation” is toast.
Posted by: yeah.i.said.it | January 11, 2012, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Well I just contacted Cumberland Farms Corporate and told them what I think of their “policy”. Even though it is more convenient for me to shop at their store at times, I’ll never buy there again!! Very POOR policy. What if this young man was MURDERED during this robbery? Wow, such a heartless thing. This is just a small part of all that is WRONG with the USA, and MOST of it relates to MONEY$$$
Posted by: demNme5 | January 11, 2012, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
“The logic about safety makes no sense here. Hypothetically if the store posted a sign indicating the registers have no more than $75 in them the robber either didn’t see them or chose to ignore them ” Or they saw how busy it was and figured that there was much more in the till than the sign said for the very reason Mr. Moore cited he hadn’t put the excess cash in the drop safe. Or perhaps you’re right and the rule is there not for safety but to prevent employees from setting up an inside job by having a lot of readily accessible money in the register. Habitual thieves, even those who rob convenience stores, try to ensure that the reward is worth the risk of getting caught or worse. In any case, my opinion is that Mr. Moore can do at least as well as running the risk of getting shot while earning minimum wage( or close to it) by working elsewhere.
Posted by: MyTake | January 11, 2012, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
And I am sure that if a poll was taken, the customers and staff would have felt ever so much safer had the robber only gotten away with $75.00 instead of the massive $150.00 he banked.
Posted by: Timme62 | January 11, 2012, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Hmm… Cumberland is owned by Gulf Oil? What possible synergies are there here? Coffee for their workers? Customers for their stores? LOL!!! Great idea to contact the company demnme5! I’m sure Ari Haseotes will take the call because Carin is so overwhelmed at this moment.
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | January 11, 2012, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
He was probably working alone. It was busy and he had no time to count out the money and then leave his station to put the overage into a safe. He is there 2 years, paid less than $9.00 and is fired because he did not follow the protocol set up by some higher up who NEVER did the job, has no clue how to operate a register or anything. The Upper management guy who fired him will probably get a raise for looking out for Corporates Best Interests. Totally screwed up priorities. If I were the clerk – look for a good lawyer and sue them for making you work in a hazardous/ dangerous work environment.
Posted by: pksk531 | January 11, 2012, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
What Cumberland Farms Corporate did was wrong. Its a shame that this happened and is very telling of the nature of our corporate culture.
Posted by: Galactus898 | January 11, 2012, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Not to question this young man’s honesty, but this type of policy is meant to prevent “inside job.” It is easy for a clerk to tip off his or her posse about the most convenienet time to rob a store. Afterwards, they would go and share their loot or bounty.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 11, 2012, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
I for one will never shop at Cumberland Farms again. The company response was completely without compassion or caring and carried out by individuals who have obviously never worked 40hrs a week in a convenience store for 2 years at $9 per hour. The guy just went through a traumatic experience and they fire him??????????? Thankless job, no security, no assistance and no appreciation that when you are the one person minding the store, you can’t just leave customers on their own to move cash around even if company policy dictates. If he had left the front of the store, and they might have lost more than $150 to shoplifting. Idiots. You lost a loyal employee and with any luck…..you’re going to lose loyal customers. Who at the top gets axed for this stupid call????????
Posted by: Mimster | January 11, 2012, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
I hope the patrons of this store find another place to spend their money.
Posted by: Jerry | January 11, 2012, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Clearly, this smells like an inside job. More to the firing than what is said on surface.
Posted by: MROBVIOUS | January 11, 2012, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Having $5 or $500 in the till won’t have any effect upon a potential robber who is unaware how much cash is in the till. How having less than $75 would keep anyone safe is beyond me. If there is any video footage of the actual robbery, the company is beyond excuse. Less money in the till doesn’t make ANYONE safer.
Posted by: James Kimble | January 11, 2012, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
I don’t think a lot of commenters here have ever run a cash register – i did at a Busch Gardens in the 70s, and my register took in over $2,000 per shift. Would he have had to leave the register unattended to get the money to the safe? How busy had it been in the half hour before the robbery? Most registers keep track of the amount of the sale, and the amount tendered, so you can easily see if he had received a number of large bills immediately before the robbery. Details are needed.
Posted by: Sheila | January 11, 2012, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Just because you don’t understand a policy doesn’t mean that it doesn’t have a purpose. Many convenience stores have this protocol with the main purpose being to protect their employees. Robbing convenience stores is a criminal habit that is being perpetuated by the inherent low security relative to large amounts of cash. Security can only be improved so much, but you can reduce the robbers’ incentive by lowering the amount of money in the drawer. If everyone followed this rule, over time armed robbers might stop viewing convenience stores as being worth the risk relative to the reward they are getting. By ignoring the rule, this worker is putting all other convenience store workers in danger by demonstrating the fact that rules are being ignored and the potential for a large cash payout from a robbery is still high. The fact that the store was busy is not an excuse – someone working there for two years should know how to deal with that situation.
Posted by: brofratbro | January 11, 2012, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Easy solution, when it goes about $75, put it in your pocket. Then you are in full compliance.
Posted by: Mateo N | January 11, 2012, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
I live in Mass but NOT near this Cumberland Farms store. I hope the people of that town pose a BOYCOT along with people outside holding up signs to warn others of what took place. Firing a man 3 days before Christmas tells me this company is SCROOGED!
Posted by: demNme5 | January 11, 2012, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Simple- show your disapproval by People Power- boycott the store.
Employers need to understand that you can’t treat poeple like that and get away with it!!
Posted by: Dennis | January 11, 2012, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
The world has rules. Or atleast it used to. And all you mamby pambys crying “He was a good employee!”. No, he wasn’t. He didn’t follow the rules. And I’m not a republican, I’m a democrat, just to deflect all that crap due to it being a election year. You can vote with your conscious, not with your wallet, and still believe we ought to close the loopholes and follow the rules.
Posted by: Bryan | January 11, 2012, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Cumberland Farms, you have LOST MY BUSINESS and I hope the business of many readers here!!
Posted by: simpsonteam | January 11, 2012, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
The corporate attitude at work. Lousy working conditions,and in this particular instance a man facing the threat of being killed, then the business firing him. Boycott this company.
Posted by: spence | January 11, 2012, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
All of you dissing on Cumberland Farms – there is a safety factor here. If the robber realized that there was $150 rather than $75 in the register he probably would have brought two guns. As it was, knowing the policy he only brought one. So you can clearly see that their policy works. As for Mr. Moore, I hope he completes school., gets a good job, makes a fortune, buys Cumberland Farms and fires all involvred in stupid policies and decisions.
Posted by: Larry C | January 11, 2012, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Question. What if you haave to give someone change for a 50? Now you have a 50 in your drawer and only $30 in small bills, but you have to put some in the safe. You are left with large bills and (I am assuming based on their safety policy), the kid working the register can’t get INTO the safe. How does he get change if he can’t make change for the customer? I understand putting a limit, but with it being near Christams, more money is necessary to make the change customers will inevitably need.
Posted by: Daniel | January 11, 2012, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Cumberland farms is the WORST employer out there. Some years back there was a class action suit against them because they would systematically accuse employees of stealing money or merchandise from them and attempt to extort money from their employees.. or threaten to send them to jail if the employee did not pay up!! They would lie and say they had video evidence of the employee stealing… when no such thing existed. What legitimate employeer does that?
Posted by: FedUpWithBigGovernment | January 11, 2012, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
I will boycott Cumberland Farms from now on! I will not endorse a Company that treats it’s employee’s this way. A simple write up or warning would suffice for such a minor infraction.
Posted by: KHowe | January 11, 2012, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Boycott! Boycott! Boycott! Boycott! Boycott! Boycott! Boycott!
Posted by: Yuliq | January 11, 2012, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Cumberland Farms, you will not get any business from me. Your policies are ridiculous.
Posted by: Terry | January 11, 2012, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
___”Question. What if you haave to give someone change for a 50? Now you have a 50 in your drawer and only $30 in small bills, but you have to put some in the safe. You are left with large bills and (I am assuming based on their safety policy), the kid working the register can’t get INTO the safe. How does he get change if he can’t make change for the customer? I understand putting a limit, but with it being near Christams, more money is necessary to make the change customers will inevitably need.”
Posted by: Daniel | January 11, 2012, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm_____________Most of these convenient stores have signs that say that large bills are not accepted. I have seen a store which says bills lager that $20 are not accepted. It is meant to reduce the inceidence of poeple passing counterfeit currencies into the system.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 11, 2012, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
I am in agreement with alot of people here.
As a delivery driver in and around the cities of Boston,Framingham, and Worcester,I stop into different convience stores for beverages and snacks on a regular basis.
I for one will be letting all my co-workers know what they did to this guy after getting robbed and telling them NOT to stop there and support a company that treats their employees like that.
Mr. Moore is right…the customer does come first, and all the other side work can and should be put off til customers are taken care of.
shame on Cumberland Farms…I know the company will never fold,but at least we can hit them where it counts in the wallet.
Posted by: JimStetson | January 12, 2012, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Having worked probably 10 years on the night shift at various convenience stores, let me offer a few things.
1. Depending upon where it was located, putting monies into the drop safe could be relatively easy or close to impossible with customers in the store, at the pumps, etc. Generally they choose the location for it with about as much common sense applied as they use to write the policy about when/how to drop the money. If all he had to do was grab a stack of bills, turn and put them in the slot, that’s one thing. If he had to count it fill out a form, wrap it in a rubber band, and leave the immediate area of the register (like many places) then he’d have probably been held liable for the shoplifting and drive offs that occurred ie lose/lose
2. Whenever a company makes a big point of saying “this isn’t about the money” – it’s about the money…. after all they were too cheap to schedule a second person on a day that they knew, or should have based upon past years, it would be very busy. Maintaining a “$75 maximum” was difficult on a busy night by yourself with $2 gas, so with $4? That’s less than ONE SUV fill up!
3. Evening/Night shift traditionally get dumped all the jobs that the day people didn’t get to (or didn’t want to), plus all the restocking and most of the cleaning. On a slow night you can get it all done, on a busy one, you’ve got about 200 things that need doing and you DO get a bit frazzled. It’s easy to lose track of something like making a dump.
4. The evening/night clerks not only traditionally have the highest probability of getting robbed, they also have the highest probability of being made the scapegoat by the manager/owner when things go wrong. (I worked at a place where the assistant manager was selling stuff out the back door. They fired all the night and evening folks as a matter of course, BEFORE actually investigating!)
Posted by: Allen | January 12, 2012, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Rather than limit the register to $75 and fire this young man for doing his job, they should encourage workers to get their concealed-carry licenses and prevent the money-and possibly their lives-from being stolen in the first place.
Posted by: John W | January 12, 2012, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
To everyone upset that he “wasn’t following the rules” What idiot makes a rule that your only allowed to have $75 in the (gas station!) register at a time? Lets try to come up with a hypothetical situation. Gas station has x customers waiting in line, y are there for gas, z of them are there for lottery tickets. Lets just say that the gas purchasers have to fill up 20 – 25 gallon tanks at $3.5 per gal. Lets say that instant lottery tickets can cost up to $20 per ticket and at around $5 for a full lotto ticket and they get w (whatever) amount of tickets. To keep it simple just ignore any other purchases such as drinks, food, and cigarettes. Even with just a few average customers your emptying the register every time you turn around! Cost me over $80 to fill an f150 tank yesterday, I guess I should’ve been fired the attendant when I handed her the money :( I could only imagine how busy it was when people were actually buying cards and gifts from a gas station.
Posted by: Beezy | January 12, 2012, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
I won’t shop at Cumberland Farms again. They shouldn’t have fired him.
Posted by: Librarian53 | January 12, 2012, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Now we know which convenience store to avoid
Posted by: bobby | January 13, 2012, 9:58 am 9:58 am
iT’S always ABOUT THE MONEY. tHEY ONLYCARE ABOUT THE EMPLOYEE AS A MATTER OF LIABILITY-NOTHING MORE, NOTHING LESS
Posted by: JOE | January 13, 2012, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Cumberland Farms is a crook. They did approximately the same thing to my cousin many years ago. They said that they did an inventory of the store and he was over $500 short of gas receipts. They made him sign a receipt for the money and were going to take it out of his pay for several months. He got smart, however, and handed this whole thing over to a lawyer. They never pushed it again. He went out and found another job and then quit.
Posted by: Bob Echola | January 13, 2012, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
At first glacnce, it seems the worker got screwed. And that’s MY first emotion too, like 95% of the people writing in here. But what if you are “management”? Your basic goal is to provide a safe working environment for ALL the workers, including Mr. Moore. Let’s ASSUME for one minute every convenience store let or looked the other way when the employee let $500 stack up. That’s a tidy some that a robber will be willing to risk 10 years in the pen for. BUT, wait, as “management” supervising 500 stores, you have found out/discovered that when its fairly well known that armed robbers don’t care to rob the $75 stores, then the incidences of armed robbery dropped radically. So, less / fewer employees are at risk and nobody gets a bullet to their head. On its own simple merit, it does look like the employee got wrong. But on the large order of things protecting employees it looks like a reasonable policy.
Posted by: Barac Obummer | January 13, 2012, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Leaving extra money in the register, and losing it in a robbery sends a message to the street that the place may be worth the risk to rob, and not just that stirs, but every store in the chain, increasing the risk of further robberies, endangering every clerk working a register. I feel for the guy, but he deserved to be fired.
Posted by: dave c | January 13, 2012, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
I think all the comments about limiting the amount of cash in the drawer will make it impractical to rob the place are hilarious. The typical person who’s going to rob a convenience store doesn’t use that much logic. It’s more like “Money in register. Me take money”. A lot of them also don’t care if they’re pulling a gun on someone for $20, $200, or $2000, to them it’s all free money. I usually get irritated when I’m on my lunch break and there’s a line of 10 people at the register at the gas station and the cashier leaves to do something aside from attending to the line. Now I know why. Forget the customers, we have policies!
Posted by: Sal Paradise | January 14, 2012, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Damn, that is messed up. First you get robbed at gunpoint and then get fired from job because, when being robbed, you had about twenty-five to fifty dollars too much in the cash register. *smdh* Hopefully, Moore will pick up an even better job now.
Posted by: Taunya Curry | January 14, 2012, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Absolutely ridiculous. As long as people continue to support greedy companies who pay for & the legislators who pass the “Employee at Will” laws, firings like this will continue. Went through a similar situation myself.
Posted by: Maria S | January 14, 2012, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
I watch the news and other crime shows. If given enough time, a robber will make the employee open the safe to get the rest of the $ and if they cant get it open may kill the employee in anger. He could have lost his LIFE just because the robber wanted to kill his witness. The loss of $75 could have been recouped from his pay check. There must have been more to the firing
Posted by: Brooklyn Girl | January 14, 2012, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
THIS COMPANY IS FULL OF IT..HOW THEY GONNA SAY BY KEEPING $75 IT ACT AS A DETERRENT FOR CRIME..LIKE THE ROBBER’S NO HOW MUCH IS IN THE REGISTER BEFORE THEY ROB IT AND THAT WILL KEEP PEOPLE SAFE..NEWS FLASH THE PEOPLE ROBBING DONT CARE IF ITS $20 IN THEIR THEY WANT IT AND WILL STILL KILL SOMEONE OVER IT
Posted by: keith | January 14, 2012, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
The store is guilty. This man was in a no win situation. Either he ignores the customers and leaves the register/gas pumps/shelves unattended to put cash in the safe, or he has too much cash in the register. Either way, he is in trouble. Do they seriously expect him to run to the safe every time someone fills up their SUV. The company should have made sure that there was enough staff working so that all of their policies could be followed. To expect one person (and on a busy day even two) to help customers, restock shelves, clean up spills, watch the gas pumps, re-fill the soda machines or ice, and still keep track of how much money is in the register and fill out the forms (there must be forms, otherwise, how would they know when the money was put there, and which till it came out of, and therefore whether or not the till was correct) to put the money in the safe. If the store wants their policies followed, they are responsible for ensuring that they have adequate staff to do so. If they do not have adequate staff, they are setting their employees up so that there is no way that every policy can be followed. Maybe that is intentional so they can fire someone and never be charged with discrimination.
Posted by: stefanie | January 14, 2012, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
For any company, it’s about the bottom line. They could care less if one of their employees was in a traumatic experience, they care about the loss. $76 is more than $75 and he would have probably been fired just the same.
Posted by: nick | January 14, 2012, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
The policy of 7-11 is to put bigger notes received in safe. Customers usually give big notes for changes. Therefore, big notes usually will not be used again. If he didn’t put the big notes in safe at the peak period, that means the robbers had taken away a lot of money.
Posted by: Ashley | January 14, 2012, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Is it company policy that the guy had a gun shoved in face?Does this company have insurance so they can reclaim their precious 25-75 dollars?Is it company policy to fire someone on Christmas Eve?I wish one day someone goes an holds up this corporate office an see if they will change there dumb policy!An to to the people saying he should lose his job I hope your company feels the same about you.Do some of you realize a convenience clerk is one of the most dangerous jobs in the US.I would like to put one of the corporate idiots in this store an see how they respond to a gun in there face .An you wonder why this country is failing,no common sense!
Posted by: Dyron | January 14, 2012, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Most robbers don’t pull a gun when it’s busy, they wait for the store to clear out.
Means the guy prob had time to lock the money up
Posted by: angler | January 14, 2012, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
This is an utter disgrace! They are trying to set an example through him that if you dont do what your told you’ll be fired too. Whats next hold on mr robber I have to take out the trash and clean the restrooms before you rob me so I dont get fired!!!! Companies dont care about employees they care about their freaking money!!!!!
Posted by: Anna Washington | January 14, 2012, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Please Mr. Moore, This is a blessing in disguise to be released from that store. The owner doesn’t know it but because you had enough money in the register at that particular time, that is what saved your life that night….If you have given the perpetrator $75.00 They would’ve been highly upset and asked for more, then you would’ve had to lead them to the safe and I will not even speak on the rest… GOD is great all the time and that time , it wasn’t your time…
Posted by: Francis Gonzalez | January 14, 2012, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
this store should be boycotted
Posted by: carrie | January 15, 2012, 2:23 am 2:23 am
I will never shop there, and I will speak to everyone I know about not shopping there either, nor looking for employment with this corporation. Good job Cumberland – hopefully word will get around and you’ll have hold up signs on the street corner asking for customers !!!! Way to support your employees.
Posted by: Pat | January 15, 2012, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
I will NEVER patronize any Cumberland Farms convenience stores!! They are the most asinine employer I have ever come across in my 60 yrs!! Cumberland Farms…. I hope you lose $$$ thousands over this ridiculous decision, due to being “BOYCOTTED”!!
Folks – this is yet another reason to get a good education or trade – so you don’t have to work for crappy companies like this – who don’t give a damn about their employee’s welfare!!! What goes around comes around!!
Posted by: makemyday | January 16, 2012, 5:24 am 5:24 am
This is a typical tactic used by employers. They give employees so many tasks to do that if they fail, which is often necessarily the case, they are terminated for cause. This justification gives the appearance of fairness. If, for instance, the employee chose to give priority to keeping the cash register drawer under $75, the customer line would have been so long that customers would have gone elsewhere to shop to save valuable last minute Christmas shopping being just 2 days before Christmas. The ensuing reduction in sales, customer complaints, lack of completion of various housekeeping chores would have assuredly led to this unfortunate employee joining the ranks of the unemployed if he had complied with the $75 till limit. The choice he had was to decide which policy or policies he would violate. He chose violating (to a modest degree I must add) the $75 cash register limit. This violation yields more money for the company and investors which is ultimately the bottom line objective for most companies- 99.999999999%. However, Cumberland Farms is not the newest sprout in the field- the PR they are getting from this story assuredly sends the message to any future robbers (at least to the ones that can read and have Internet access) that they are only going to net $75 from robbing one of its stores- not a good return on one’s risk investment. Assaulting a Cumberland Farms gets you about the same punishment as bilking millions from Wall Street Investments- use your time wisely and get an education and hopefully avoid all acts of plunder and serve humanity. The only possible scenario that may have spared this unfortunate Cumberland Farms employee this major life aggravation would be if he was protected by a labor union. As with any organization or anything for that matter- you have good and bad. A good union could have saved his job. The next time you are offered a union agreement- consider it as an insurance policy on your future- to maintain a job, and to even get a job in the future beyond your present job- for instance- this terminated Cumberland Farms employee also has to deal with having been fired from a job on his next job interview which will likely result in his long term unemployment status. Prospective employers will not even consider his application for they are avoiding even those who presently are unemployed but have a good work reference and history. A labor union is what the employees make of it- make it good and everyone, including the employer, will be served well. I have been an independent labor union organizer (so that I would decide the employee/employer dynamics), employer, business owner.
Posted by: Daniel Valletta | January 17, 2012, 10:53 am 10:53 am
If you were in Illinois all that he would have had to do before getting robbed at gunpoint was to punch out. At least there you can violate company policy, get fired, sue and successfully win your case for unemployment
Posted by: FURS | January 17, 2012, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Crackheads will rob you at gunpoint for $5.00.
Another testament to corporate stupidity. America worships corporations because it worships stupidity too.
Posted by: Rick | January 18, 2012, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Ok, I sympathize with this guy as clearly a vast majority of posters here do but what is the deal with the “this is what’s wrong with America!” remarks? We have one example of corperate shenanigans to which most reasonable people in a free America will openly object and now this is apparently the core problem with this stupidity worshipping country… One company hardly represents the whole. On the contrary, the whole has spoken here and we do not approve. Please consider for a moment how the this whole scenario is more evidence of what’s right with this country than what’s wrong with it.
Posted by: Leo | January 18, 2012, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
I support the company, what it did was the best for it’s employees, even if one of them is worse off. For all the people saying “What difference does it make how much money is in the till?”, it probably made the difference between him getting robbed and not. Criminals know the signs of a place that doesn’t have much money to rob, for a start there are signs saying “No more than $75 in till”. When an employee violates the policy he puts every other employee in danger. Clearly the robber researched the job (“cased the joint”) and established the time when there would be most money in the till. We don’t know how often this guy was lax with the cash drawer, but the robber could easily have noticed that he was lax and figured he would have more. By firing him the company is reemphaising that robbers will get no more than $75, which could save their employees lives.
Posted by: Michael Price | January 21, 2012, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
This post is priceless. Where can I find out more?
Posted by: Aldo Soptick | February 1, 2012, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm