Dec 6, 2011 12:36pm

Clothing Giant H&M Defends ‘Perfect’ Virtual Models

ht HM models photoshop thg 111206 wblog Clothing Giant H&M Defends Perfect Virtual Models

H&M

Visiting the H&M website is not the only virtual experience to be had by H&M customers who choose to order the company’s clothes online instead of inside one of their 2,300 global retail stores.

Also “completely virtual” are the models at the center of H&M’s swimsuit and lingerie online campaigns, the Swedish-based retailer confirmed.

“It’s not a real body; it is completely virtual and made by the computer,” H&M press officer Hacan Andersson told Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet in an article questioning the company’s picture-perfect online models.

In the Dec. 4 article, translated into English by U.S. celebrity website Jezebel, Andersson explained the company’s approach.

“We take pictures of the clothes on a doll that stands in the shop, and then create the human appearance with a program on [a] computer,” he said.

Images from the company’s website show models wearing the latest swimsuit and lingerie looks appear in generic, stock-form with their left hand resting slightly below their waist, right arm straight and face looking directly ahead.

Advertising watchdogs in the company’s native Scandanavia elevated the controversy by criticizing the chain of lower-cost clothing stores for their generic approach to models.

The Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation, one of the most outspoken groups to criticize H&M, accused the chain of “creating unrealistic physical ideals.”

“This illustrates very well the sky-high aesthetic demands placed on the female body,” spokesman Helle Vaagland said.  “The demands are so great that H&M, among the poor photo models, cannot find someone with both body and face that can sell their bikinis.”

Andersonn defended the company’s decision to rely on virtual instead of real models by explaining that computer-generated bodies would ensure that the garments remain the focus of online shoppers’ attention, not the model’s bodies.

“It’s not about ideals or to show off a perfect body, we are doing this to show off the garments,” he told Aftonbladet.  “This is done for all garments, not just underwear. It applies to both women’s and men’s clothing.”

A spokeswoman for the company’s U.S. operations compared the use of virtual models online to the common retail practice of using mannequins in stores.

“In our Shop Online we show our fashion through real life models pictures, still life pictures or as virtual mannequin pictures,” the spokeswoman, Nicole Christie, told ABCNews.com.  “The virtual mannequins are used in the same way as we use mannequins in our stores for ladies wear and menswear.”

Christie confirmed Andersonn’s description of how H&M creates its virtual models, as well as the intention behind the practice, one she said is common.

“This technique can be found in use throughout the industry,” Christie said.  “This is not to be seen as conveying a specific ideal or body type, but merely a technique to show our garments.”

Responding to the fire the company has come under in just the two days since the Aftonbladet article was published, Christie issued this statement to ABC:

“It is regrettable if we have led anyone to believe that the virtual mannequins should be real bodies. This is incorrect and has never been our intention.  We will continue to discuss internally how we can be clearer about this in the information towards our customers.”

 

 

SHOWS:

User Comments

Now, no one has any idea how the clothing fits. Clothing stores use real models so that individuals can judge how the clothes will fit on them.

Posted by: gg | December 6, 2011, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Seriously. These people have nothing better to do? Unrealistic models my axe.

Posted by: frankblourtango | December 6, 2011, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Comparing the “virtual mannequin” to a store mannequin is probably not too far off the target. We worry about photoshopped bodies in mags and such, but has anyone ever taken a realistic look at a store mannequin? The females have Barbie-like proportions. A potato sack would look good on them. If it is all about the clothes, then why is it so hard to find a realistic body for them to look good on?

Posted by: Jill Hall | December 6, 2011, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

“Unrealistic”??? I took a look at the dresses on their website and know that any one of them would likely fit me perfectly (except that I wear them a bit longer these days). Is my body-type “unrealistic”? It’s been exactly the same since I was 17 — and I’m 63 now. To ME they’re not “unrealistic” – my shape is quite realistic to me. What’s unrealistic is believing that every item of clothing sold is going to look the same way on every size and shape. Every well-dressed woman knows how to shop according to what fits and looks best. (I also know I’m extremely lucky – wish I had more places to go to wear stylish clothes, lol)

Posted by: Sunny | December 6, 2011, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

They get that body by working hard at the gym and eating a healthy diet…virtually ANYONE else can do too.

Posted by: No | December 7, 2011, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Isnt anything real any more, dont know about you but im sick to death with fake crap we are subjected to. Get real, for a change!

Posted by: Robert barnhart | December 7, 2011, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

If it were entirely about the garment then there would be no need for their heads/faces..

Posted by: Ryan | December 7, 2011, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

If the point is really to make a virtual mannequin, make it a solid color with no attempt to look like a person with hair, eyes, etc. The use of the digital models is far more likely just a money saving tactic that saves the time and cost of digitally reshaping a model to look nothing like herself (or himself).

Posted by: Jeremy | December 7, 2011, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

It’s ridiculous to complain about a company wanting to display it’s clothing on bodies that are aesthetically pleasing. If I were to make swimsuits, I would want to display them in the most appealing way possible. Doesn’t matter who buys them or how they will look on the people that do. Companies using skinny models is not the cause of expectation, but the effect of attraction. Models are not meant to reflect society. They are meant to reflect the TASTE of society. Sorry to the ladies that don’t want to do the work to shed the extra weight, but how is that society’s fault?

Posted by: Madman | December 9, 2011, 9:41 am 9:41 am

If you don’t like a business’s pratices, don’t buy their stuff. Vote with your wallet.
These businesses have the right to use virtual models. I can definitely see how changing out clothing is MUCH easier when it would cost a LOT more to do this with live models.

And a previous poster had a comment. Not many complain about mannequins in the actual store… but we don’t want to pay REAL people to stand there and model the clothes every day… after all, they are a low-cost store, so to maintain low-costs…. they’ve decided to use these measures. Fine with me, and makes sense.

Posted by: Stephen | December 9, 2011, 9:55 am 9:55 am

I have doubts that those are computer generated images. Anything computer generated was really created by an artist and those bodies and faces look too realistic. If anything, they are just cutting and pasting bodies and faces from real models.

Posted by: Chris | December 9, 2011, 10:03 am 10:03 am

look close… Both of the pictures are the exact same body, maybe a slightly different skin tone, but the same bones and belly button.

click click, new face and outfit. Next!

Posted by: Mike | December 9, 2011, 10:06 am 10:06 am

So I guess it’s easier to blast fashion companies for using skinny-looking models instead of just admitting that being overweight is not okay as obesity is responsible for more preventable deaths and healthcare costs than anything else we have ever seen.

Honestly, why are these companies always seen as the “bad guys” when they are likely responsible for many times more people taking control and becoming healthy than our health educational system could have ever hoped for? I guess it’s easier to blame them for their “unrealistic” ideals than it is to blame ourselves for our sedentary and over-indulging lifestyles transforming our bodies into something it was never designed to become in the first place.

Posted by: Josh | December 9, 2011, 10:43 am 10:43 am

So now, instead of taking a real model and Photoshopping her into looking like a computer-generated figure, they’re going straight to the computer-generated version. Makes sense, I guess.

Either way, what does it say about us that we seem to prefer a false perfection, over a picture of a real person?

Posted by: Lloyd | December 9, 2011, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

I bet no one would be complaining had the developer made this more dynamic. …perhaps make the virtual model chunkier by simply dragging a control. Hmm, no, that’s old school, I think we just pinch our trackpads and screens now.

Posted by: Carlos | December 10, 2011, 1:56 am 1:56 am

So… their website doesn’t have these images on it.

Posted by: John | December 30, 2011, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

One more thing. In my opinion that there are quite a few travel insurance websites of respectable companies that permit you to enter your journey details and get you the prices. You can also purchase this international travel insurance policy on the net by using your current credit card. All that you should do is usually to enter your own travel particulars and you can view the plans side-by-side. Simply find the plan that suits your finances and needs after which it use your credit card to buy the idea. Travel insurance online is a good way to do investigation for a trustworthy company regarding international holiday insurance. Thanks for giving your ideas.

Posted by: Arthur Ambeau | January 12, 2012, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

When I was becoming an adult, Saturday failed to BEGIN until “Soul Train” came for the air! I not really know what personal hell drove you to take your personal life, Brother Don, but are aware that you were–and always will be–loved and revered in my house FOREVER! Love, Peace, and SOUL!

Posted by: Simon Staufenberger | February 4, 2012, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.