Lions, Tigers, Bears on the Loose in Ohio
As many as 48 wild animals, including cheetahs, grizzly bears, black bears, wolves, tigers and lions are on the loose in the area of Zanesville, Ohio, after they escaped from a private wildlife preserve, police said tonight.
Officers believe they have shot as many as 25 of the animals so far, but it is not clear exactly how many escaped, according to the Muskingum County Sheriff’s Department.
Muskingum County Sheriff Matt Lutz said that until the animals are rounded up, people should stay inside.
“These are wild animals, wild animals that you would see on TV in Africa,” Mutz said at a news conference this evening.
Terry Thompson, the owner of the preserve was found dead, but it’s not clear yet how he died, the sheriff said.
“This is a bad situation,” Mutz said. “It’s been a bad situation for a long time and the last thing we want to do is have any of our public hurt.”
The animals’ pens were found open, and deputies are working with the animals’ caregiver, who says the animals were fed Monday.
They’re putting food in the animals’ pens in the hopes they might return the pens where they can then secure the animals.
Police describe the animals as “mature, very big and aggressive.”
The Ohio State Highway Patrol has cordoned off seven square miles near Interstate 70 and officers are using infrared to find the animals.
Email



RSS
Twitter
Facebook
When they say “shot” I sure as hell hope they mean with a tranqilizer gun. If they just go out and shoot to kill those animals without trying to tranquulize them that’s unexcusable
Posted by: cds | October 18, 2011, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Really? Wild, vicious animals get loose within 30 miles of several colleges and large towns/cities and you’re upset that they might have killed the animals? Do you not realize that these animals will most likely kill all the people they come across? A cheetah will not be scared of a person, nor could the person get away. There are 20+ animals still loose, I think you should be more worried about the number of people that could be killed instead of the animals.
Posted by: k | October 18, 2011, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Who do they think let them out?…who could have opened all those cages and let them out without getting killed except the owner or the caregiver?!
Posted by: ____ | October 18, 2011, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Since all the pens were open at once it sounds like foul play was involved. If the animals got to the owner it may be hard to tell if one of them killed him or if he was killed by a deranged person who set the animals free. PETA? Some of their people have been known to pull some pretty crazy stunts.
I would aviod those animals if at all possible. 911 would be my first choice. I know I don’t have a gun big enough to stop a lion or tiger but if I was cornered or defending my family, I’d try. 12 ga. slug at close range has got to do something. Best to stay inside and hope they don’t try to come through the window. Double pane glass won’t even slow down a big cat.
Posted by: cloud | October 18, 2011, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
I hope the people going out to shot the animals remember alot of these animals are an endangered species. There is no excuse if they don’t try to use a tranquilizer gun first.
Posted by: MY | October 18, 2011, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Are you kidding me? These animals should be in their natural habitat, not near a college in Ohio. They don’t deserve to be killed because some idiot wanted to keep them on a farm, where they DONT BELONG! Tranquilize them and place them in an appropriate environment.
Posted by: Chigal | October 18, 2011, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Yay! Yet another reason for officers to use their guns. Bet there are some happy Ohio policemen right now. On a more serious note though this is AMERICA! Are there not ANY tranquilizers around? I refuse to believe not. I feel bad for the animals.. caged up their entire lives like they were felons to finally feel freedom only to be shot and killed 2 seconds later. A shame! Wonderful animals dead or on their way to beng so.
Posted by: Jeremy | October 18, 2011, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
This isn’t even remotely an ordinary happening. Those involved are doing the best they can, I’m sure. Knowledge of tranquilizing, availability of the gun and meds also are a consideration. Shooting to kill is the best tactic they have in some instances. It is not in-exusable to protect the public; they’re doing their job under extraordinary circumstances. I’m sure all involved will do their best to contain the animals, and alive if not risking a person’s life.
Posted by: Amy | October 18, 2011, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
You do realize most Animal Preserves or Sanctuaries are where rescued animals go from places like circus’s and private owners. These animals usually can’t be released into the wild.
Posted by: DD | October 18, 2011, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Lions and tigers and bears?!
Oh my!
Posted by: Jane Doe | October 18, 2011, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
“A cheetah will not be scared of a person, nor could the person get away”
Umm, have you ever met a cheetah? I’m pretty sure there’s never been a cheetah mauling. They don’t even have claws. If a cheetah were to run at full speed they’re incapacitated for five minutes or so. And yes, THEY WOULD BE SCARED OF A PERSON.
Just trying to solve some ignorance.
And this is plain horrible.
Posted by: Aimee | October 18, 2011, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
I live in this area. My husband spotted a tiger in our yard from the house as I was outside with our dog. It was within 150 feet of our house and luckily my husband scared it away by firing a gun. We called 911. What most people do not realize is, for the most part this is a very rural area and the men and women handling this are local Sheriff’s deputies. In my county alone, we are lucky to have more than 2 deputies on duty a night because of budget issues. They do not have the man power and equipment to tranquilize and transport these animals. Our local law enforcment are more concerned with keeping people safe. Aparently these animals are aggressive and are not afraid to come near houses or people. I know it is horrible to think of that many innocent animals being killed but right now my neighbors are more concerned about what they will see when they go to put the kids on the school bus tomorrow.
Posted by: Jen | October 19, 2011, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Wow. Clearly you’ve never read anything. Cheetahs have claws. They are non-retractable. They use their thumb claw to hook prey during the chase and then immediately aim to bite their neck. Looks like I’m solving some ignorance. And they may only be able to run at full speed for about 5 minutes, but I’m pretty sure that would give them PLENTY of time to catch a human. Also, go ahead and google “cheetah mauling.” You’ll get results, so it looks like there have been some. Where were you getting your facts? Out of a children’s book about safari animals?
Cheetahs may be scared of humans, since you seems to know them SO well, but what about grizzly bears, black bears, tigers? I am ABSOLUTELY positive there have been SEVERAL maulings by these animals.
Look things up before you go and say things that make you seem stupid.
Posted by: k | October 19, 2011, 12:05 am 12:05 am
Amazing that people pass judgment when they are not on the scene, not involved in law enforcement, not responsible for the safety of the community, not aware of what materials and supplies are available, never used a tranquilizer on an animal, never dealt with a situation remotely like this one and have probably never even seen one of these animals up close. But they somehow feel qualified to judge people who are undoubtedly doing the best they can do.
I read that the police used (so called) assualt rifles to kill the animals. Those are usually low powered weapons but probably all they had available. I don’t think a .223 is big enough to make a lion mad but most cops don’t carry a 500 nitro in the trunk. I hope they get something appropriate for big game before they run into a big cat or large bear. I assume they have someone who can handle a big gun.
Posted by: cloud | October 19, 2011, 12:08 am 12:08 am
GREAT POINT, JEN.
At this point is ISN’T about the animals, as sad as it is to see them killed. It is about the people living, working, and going to school in these areas. The inadequate law inforcement in these small Ohio towns is doing all they can, but unfortunately extremes are necessary.
Posted by: k | October 19, 2011, 12:11 am 12:11 am
JUST ANOTHER EXCUSE FOR COPS TO TARGET PRACTICE !!!! TRANQ THEM FIRST CHOICE UNLESS A LIFE IS IN DANGER!!!!!
Posted by: ROBERT | October 19, 2011, 12:19 am 12:19 am
They should hunt down and shoot the ones who let the animals out
Posted by: Terry | October 19, 2011, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Have you ever been to this part of Ohio? My guess is no. Do you think they just have endless amounts of tranquilizer and people able to use it properly and transport the animals in an area that has TWO wildlife places, one being a preserve 30 miles away, the other being a zoo that is over an hour away?? Obviously not. This is a rural area in Ohio, small towns, not a lot of action. Police stations here are not prepared for this. And by the time the zoo or preserve were able to bring tranquilizer it could be too late. Animals can travel much faster than humans, obviously. The police have to contain the animals the best they can with the materials they have.
I’m sure they don’t enjoy shooting these animals.
Posted by: K | October 19, 2011, 12:31 am 12:31 am
In the Land of the Brave . Lets all panic and shoot the wild animals. Meanwhile what will we do about the 13,500 people murdered each year in America. Since 9/11 over 135,000 people have been murdered in America . But for now its time to panic and kill a few wild beasts.Ah yes the Land of the Brave…..
Posted by: GalacticCannibal | October 19, 2011, 1:16 am 1:16 am
P.E.T.A. Did it! Sounds like their MO.
Posted by: Joe | October 19, 2011, 1:26 am 1:26 am
I think it is pathetic that they are shooting animals, i dont care if they dont have tranqualizers they should get some. yes alot of peoples lives are endangered but so are the animals. They are probably more scared then we are. The columbus zoo needs to do more and intervene if they are so into protecting animals. Yes some animals may be shot but they shouldnt shoot them all or any its wrong, peoples safety is everything and the economy sucks but can we not be savages?
Posted by: M | October 19, 2011, 1:50 am 1:50 am
I live in Muskingum County. We are not a wealthy community and I’m sure we did not have any kind of emergency plan for something like this. So the choices are…Let them run free all over the place while we scramble to find some tranquilizer guns or shoot them right away so they don’t wandering to the bus stops and kill our children. It’s very sad that this had to happen but come on now…people’s safety is at risk and our officers are doing the right thing by trying to protect the community. Either way it’s a damn if you do or damn if you don’t situation. I love animals but I love my family more.
Posted by: Jennifer | October 19, 2011, 2:41 am 2:41 am
Why is man’s brilliant solution always the same: KILL it. Ohio is not an isolated, third-world country devoid of assistance. I’m sure there are veterinarians, zookeepers, other sanctuary owners, private volunteers, and animal welfare organizations who would be willing to help locate and humanely trap or tranquilize these animals so they could be safely returned to their “home.” I would love to help! The exaggerated hysteria expressed by so many of you is ridiculously premature and cruelly insensitive. These animals have been regularly fed and cared for. They are not ravenous, rabid, vicious beasts looking to attack and devour the first human they may encounter. Although I’m not an animal-behaviorist, I’m sure they are relishing what little “freedom” they’ve ever known and their survival instincts compel them to seek isolated shelter, not a bus-stop or schoolyard full of children. We don’t need melodramatic mass-hysteria, we need practical solutions to a tragic circumstance. Would it be too much to ask this relatively small community to inconvenience themselves for a short time by remaining indoors until all of the animals could be located and retrieved? Perhaps after the inept police are done slaughtering the innocent victims of this catastrophe, they can get back to the real crime: solving who murdered the sanctuary-owner and who allowed the animals to escape? God Bless the sanctuary-owner for paying the ultimate price for trying to do something good, and God Bless all of the animals who continue to be massacred by man’s arrogantly callous remedy towards all creatures not “human!”
Posted by: Justine | October 19, 2011, 3:23 am 3:23 am
There is no “right” thing to do right now. They had to take action immediately to protect those of us and our families in the surrounding areas. I do not like the idea of all these animals being slaughtered, but I could not imagine one of my children or anyone for that matter getting killed over such carelessness. Do not blame the people who are trying to help. Blame the idiots who decided that we should have such weak laws on these animals in our state. This is something that should have been taken care of a long time ago. And trust me…… there is a lot more about this than you will ever get to hear about.
Posted by: Lisa | October 19, 2011, 4:28 am 4:28 am
i watched tv news and said officers already killed some animals.. no need to kill them. they should use a tranqilizer gun to make them sleep then bring them back into cages. they just don’t want to have a lot of responsible by taking animals back into the cages – they only want to do is to have a simple job by killing them. very sad!!
Posted by: dolly | October 19, 2011, 5:31 am 5:31 am
I understand that this is in a rural area and I agree this is a public safety issue. But come on, not enough tranquilizers? Ohio isn’t a third world country. It said they have a swat team with night vision goggles so they obviously have adequate resources here. Killing them all is inexcusable. Some of these are endangered animals. I think classifying them as man eating animals hungry and ready to.kill is a bit of an exaggeration. They should be doing what they can to protect the people but also the animals. I think killing the animal should be the last option but based on the article and others I have read it appears the sheriff has given them total authority to shoot and kill them . Very sad. The officers are going to get a lot of heat for this.for
Posted by: soraya | October 19, 2011, 5:55 am 5:55 am
There’s much more information locally, than what has been released to the media. He opened the cages before killing himself. When deputies arrived on the scene, they killed 25 animals before even reaching his body. A couple of the lions were standing guard of the body, but the rest were on the property when deputies opened fire on anything not secured in a cage. They were quoted in the local paper as saying “The only reason tranquilizers were on scene, was in case an animal ended up in a place where shooting to kill it, would endanger the lives of people.” They’ve made no effort to save any of the animals, rumor has it that they shot a giraffe also, but I’m not sure about that one. Since they ordered the public to shoot to kill last night, pickup trucks with lights and a bed full of locals with guns have been seen all over the city of Zanesville. Two more cat deaths are known, within a few miles of the farm. Large cats are the majority of the roaming animals, along with bear, and wolves. This story has been spun to appear as if the owner was killed by dangerous animals, and the animals escaped. Most of the animals were used to being around people, and all were captive their entire lives. Hopefully someone steps in and stops the senseless killing, and finds a place for them.
Posted by: Josh | October 19, 2011, 6:14 am 6:14 am
The cages don’t open themselves. I’m guessing the owner surprised some animal rights activists who were opening the cages to “free” the animals, things got out of hand, and he was killed. Now those “free” animals are dead. Is that what you prefer, PETA? BTW – PETA regularly puts down cats and dogs in multiple animal shelters, so don’t give them too much sympathy.
Posted by: Bob | October 19, 2011, 6:34 am 6:34 am
The police/municipality should go to court after all of this is over and recover their costs from this man’s estate. If you have a wild animal fetish, don’t expect tax-payers to absorb the cost of fixing the situation when it gets out of control. The same should be true for other idiotic stunts that lead to taxpayer expense.
Posted by: AJ | October 19, 2011, 6:41 am 6:41 am
all pens opened and owner dead?
you can bet this was the work of radical animal activists. there have been several reports nationwide, with ALF sending out press releases claiming responsibility, for releasing animals (who end up dead, hit int he road or shot-yeah, some freedom)
whoever up there claimed this was a suicide and the owner opened the cages must be smoking something funny- the owner had additional help for caretaking the animals, there’s no way he would have released them to be harmed.
Posted by: Dannielle | October 19, 2011, 7:57 am 7:57 am
let one of those tigers or lions come in my yard one time ive shot a bear before pretty sure i could take down a tiger or lion and whatever else comes in the yard and sorry to people that feel bad for them gettting shot but if it comes down to me or them its going to be them tranq darts dont kick in right away by the time it kicks in your dead unless your far away and more than likely thats not going to be the case dont get me wrong i like animals like that too but not in my damn yard theres kids everywhere around here and i got a little girl of my own and you wouldnt feel bad for the animal if a child was killed over this crap so rethink your comments
Posted by: Jeremy | October 19, 2011, 8:03 am 8:03 am
Abusive owner, trigger happy local law enforcement and yokels, bad laws – only the animals lose. Sad. Way to go OH. You suck!
Posted by: Karen | October 19, 2011, 8:44 am 8:44 am
There is no reason for the first course of action to be murdering these animals. I’m fairly certain that when these. Animals were shot they were not trying to attack anyone. And like an earlier poster said, her husband shot off a gun and scares one away, they are obviously skiddish and more than likely substantially more afraid of you than you are of them. And there isn’t enough tranquilizers? I’m pretty sure there’s probably plenty but there’s also probably plenty of officers who want to brag about how they killed a tiger. How is the population so high in Africa if these animals are so blood thirsty for human flesh? Shame on you Ohio. I could understand if they had been trying to harm someone but no they are out having to thoroughly SEARCH for these animals which tells me they aren’t wandering into your houses. Jesus people take your fingers off the trigger and think before you start killing innocent animals who already had a terrible life.
Posted by: lauren | October 19, 2011, 9:45 am 9:45 am
All the animals were permitted. It’s sad that people can “collect” exotic animals. There have been complaints on this guy in the past, but he was “up to code” when he was investigated. He did just get out of federal prison (for gun charges from 5 years ago – he served a 1 year sentence) and was on house arrest. Also, supposedly his wife just left him. Sooooo according to local news here in Columbus, Ohio, he opened the cages and shot himself! Irresponsible no doubt, but who knows? Maybe he was thinking about the animals in his twisted way of thinking and wanted to let them loose to live the lives they should be and not in cages….granted, that life should be in Africa or somewhere and not in the middle of a populated area. And as sad as it is for the police to shoot them, they have no choice. Human life has to come first. But the Columbus Zoo, Jack Hanna himself, and people from The Wilds are all there now with tranquilizer guns. Hopefully some of the animals can be saved. I will say however that it is in VERY bad taste to publish pictures of the dead animals! VERY VERY bad taste!
Posted by: Tina | October 19, 2011, 9:45 am 9:45 am
The animals are the victims. They are so used to humans that stay nearby to defend there deceased owner whom they did not kill. They are so peaceful you can pat them. they are declawed, toothless, and humble. The woods in that area of the country often has bears in them.
The swat team is inexperienced at scientific options. they can’t capture or aprehend or just wait for the animals to return to the farm home with is what they do after a few hours away . this is what domestic animals do when a dog is loose for a few hours of freedom he returns and waits for is beloved owner to pat his belly and nourish him.
The people the swat team and the desire to play them up as dangerous methodic killers to get a spot on the news and justify the over funding of guns and weapons for a sat team the area can ill afford and certainly doesn’t need should’t be allowed.
needless and knee jerl legislative actions spell a remove al of rights from residents down the road and will be written ins ays to ill effect many things that are never discussed when the laws are enacted or thought of then.
all unnesecary–\
What is needed is to ask the question of why the needless killings.
This is a modern age and certainly these harmless animals should not be feared.
Scientific capture methods tossed out, even though others will say they haven’t been the truth is they have been. People ar ethe killers . People lead to and didn’t dissolve this from happening all up and down every step of the way.
The anima;l owner and takers on TV are not animal rights leaders. They view themselves as such but then turn to defend the incompetent actions of the killings.
Inner cages opened , outer gates sealed, no teeth, declawed, like grizzly adams – these animals are human friendly the god meant them and us to be yet we are the animals the killers since the children haven’t been taught scientific methods and ways other than to play with NAZU police
Posted by: donald | October 19, 2011, 9:52 am 9:52 am
I can not believe that they are killing these animals. Every one of these animals wild or not should be tranquilized and found a good home in a zoo or private sanctuary. Some of the species are on the endangered list. Why in the world would you go shooting them. Good job Ohio being the good old hicks that you are! Flipping idiots……….
Posted by: Lindsey | October 19, 2011, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Most animals are much more dangerous if they’re angry from being wounded. If an officer doesn’t make a clean killshot, they’re most likely making the situation worse. Whether you feel that the animals should be killed or not, not using a tranq seems like a poor choice for public safety.
The animals all came out of cages that worked until the doors were left open, knock out the animal and put it back in its cage. It is ethically hard enough for Zoo’s to obtain new animals without impacting the world’s habitats anyway, I’m sure the zoos would line up to take the animals. That option sounds much easier and is socially more acceptable than disposing of 30+ very large bodies too.
Although I was surprised to read that they were killing the animals, I wouldn’t expect a different decision to have been made. Our country has a pretty consistent track record of killing things that it perceives to be dangerous whether it’s Nazi’s, Al Qaeda, or African animals… Right or wrong, nobody should be surprised.
Posted by: Jim | October 19, 2011, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Wow worst article ever…..basically no information provided.
Posted by: Brenda | October 19, 2011, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Letting the most dangerous mammals on the planets loose.
hahaha gotta love ohio
Posted by: Tim | October 19, 2011, 11:25 am 11:25 am
I love animals, possibly more than humans. This situation BREAKS MY HEART. How was this person able to cruelly and yet legally keep these animals in cages on his property? What a horrible life to live, out of your native environment, in an area where the temperature goes below freezing 4-6 months out of the year. There is no way these animals were “healthy” in any sense of the word. Some of the animals were endangered; however, none of these animals could be returned to the wild to improve breeding rates because NONE of the animals had the skills to live in the wild, not having had the opportunity to be taught by the mother the requisite survival skills. So immensely sad for all. I’m angry and hurt. This is not conservation.
That said, I’m in the area where this is happening, and I don’t appreciate the Monday morning armchair quarterbacks, with the statements that we are hicks and are unnecessarily killing animals. How ignorant and judgmental! We are doing the best we can here, with a rotten situation that was brought on by a person who must have been unimaginably ignorant to the misery he has brought to these animals over the years. Some of the cats he has kept over the years had apparently been DECLAWED! (I want to meet the vet that did that–how incredibly unethical!) It is not the first time this “sanctuary” of hell has been in the eyes of the law or animal protection.
I feel bad for this guy, though, in some respects—although I’m angry for his actions; he seems to have been tormented, perhaps mentally ill…with multiple run-ins with the law and apparently taking his own life in the end. We don’t have any reason to believe anyone else was on the property to let loose these animals, as evidence points to him being the one who did so. This is where mental health and health care in general lets us all down in the end…this guy was sick, filling some void in his life and mind with an unbelievably unhealthy fetish, and in the end, a community is terrorized and dozens of animals have to die because of it.
No, our sheriffs in Ohio do not regularly keep animal tranquilizers. Yes, it’s pretty rural in this part of Ohio. Yes, some of the animals were tranq’ed; however, have you never seen Animal Planet? It’s not that easy to do so successfully, even when the animal is pinned, let alone roaming freely. You need tremendous manpower, which no one had at the time, partly because of budget issues. One of the animals continued to run after a tranq attempt…in the dark, with limited ability to track. There is no way to know if you got the tranq in unless you watch the animal go down. No one has been trigger happy or wanted to do this…it has not been fun or sport. These are wild animals, and wild animals do attack and maul…we do not generally think of how wild animals behave because THIS IS NOT AFRICA, and thus we do not have a frame of reference. However, the situation was very volatile, in the middle of the night, in a rural area, but well-within less than a day’s trek for any of these animals to cities, towns, schools, colleges/universities, homes, farms, etc. It’s not the image people are portraying and I RESENT it tremendously. I would venture that many of us have more education than the lot on this page combined, and many of us are animal lovers, committed to animal rights and respect of Mother Earth and ALL her inhabitants. What would have been said if these animals had killed a person, or a child, or someone’s horse/cat/dog? These animals were indeed already off the grounds this man owned.
If you are that incensed by this event that you feel it necessary to make a miserable situation even worse by demonizing not only first responders but EVERYONE in the entire state, then do SOMETHING PRODUCTIVE. Please, PLEASE, write/call/email Ohio state representatives, senators, and the governor and DEMAND that the legislation go through now to that was designed to prevent people from the cruelty of keeping wild animals as pets and sideshows. Demand that they deal with this now, and design ways to enforce the law. Then, start making those calls and emails to DC. We need to make a stand now that no Man has the right to make pets of wild animals.
Then, read a book about wild animals, or watch Animal Planet…they have a great show about people keeping wild animals as “pets.” It will be an eye-opener about what happens…how many horrific events have occurred…when ordinary people play zoo-keeper. This was a disaster waiting to happen, and we’ve done the best we can to mitigate losses knowing just what COULD have happened. These are not TAMED animals because you cannot tame a wild, non-domesticated animal. Domestication of animals has taken thousands of years, and even then, people still get hurt and killed by domesticated animals every year. Thousands of people are killed every year in Africa by tigers, lions, etc., just by going into areas where these animals live; how silly to believe otherwise.
Really, folks, get a grip on yourselves. This isn’t fun for anyone and instead of ranting about how bad and evil we all are, work for changing laws and improving animal cruelty laws and enforcement.
Posted by: Buckeye4Life | October 19, 2011, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Why do we value the lives of humans (we have BILLIONS more than this planet can handle) more than those of these endangered animals that only attack when threatened. If everyone would stay inside, it would give the “authorities” time to contact professionals equipped for this situation. But
no, they’ll just do what people do best: kill.
But go on. Defend them. They’re just doing their jobs afterall. Right?
Posted by: Zen | October 19, 2011, 11:58 am 11:58 am
From what I’ve read, the man was an animal nut who released the animals he loved so much and then was killed by what looks like a “self-inflicted wound”. The people in the community were caught off guard. The animals released are going after pets, horses, livestock and people. Jack Hanna from the zoo is helping the police, but even he said human lives come first. A lot of the animals were killed at very close range (which means they were probably going to attack the officer). It is heart wrenching to see them die, but if they can’t tranquilizer them safely, you have to see the need for it. Saying the people tracking these animals down are horrible is just naive. They ARE tranquilizing when it is safe.
Posted by: Sarah | October 19, 2011, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Sounds like a lot of lucky Ohio folk will be having exotic game for dinner! YUM! All you hippies who think animals are more important than people are just silly. Especially those who do not live anywhere near this area and know no one who could be hurt or killed by these animals. If a tiger or bear was in your backyard coming at you and you had a gun, you wouldn’t think twice about putting three shells in their head. What if it was coming at your son, niece, grandson…..Would you just say, “Well, I guess I can get another son…..I mean after all, this bear is endangered…..” I don’t think so. I just hope they put the meat to good use! Sounds delicious!
Posted by: HUNGRY! | October 19, 2011, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
@ Lindsey. WOW! ARE YOU SERIOUSLY COMPARING THE KILLING OF WILD ANIMALS TO THAT OF KILLING NAZI’S OR AL QAEDA???? ARE YOU F*ING SERIOUS!! IF YOU HONESTLY BELIEVE THE WORLD WAS WRONG FOR KILLING NAZI’S IN WWII, YOU ARE OUT OF YOUR F*ING MIND!! THAT WAS THE MOST DISGUSTING COMMENT I HAVE EVER READ!! YOU BELIEVE THE LIVES OF MILLIONS OF JEWISH PEOPLE WAS NOT WORTH OUR COUNTRY TAKING ACTION TO STOP THE NAZI’S! YOU ARE F*ING SICK! I HOPE YOU BURN IN HELL WITH WILD ANIMALS CHEWING ON YOUR SOUL WHILE NAZI’S AND MEMBER OF AL QAEDA DEFILE YOUR CORPS! “Our country has a pretty consistent track record of killing things that it perceives to be dangerous whether it’s Nazi’s, Al Qaeda, or African animals” PERCEIVES?? REALLY! WE ONLY PERCEIVED NAZI’S AND AL QAEDA AS DANGEROUS?? THEY DIDN’T KILL MILLIONS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE TO DESERVE OUR PRECONCEIVED NOTIONS ABOUT THEM?? WHAT THE HELL IS A MATTER WITH YOU???
Posted by: HUNGRY! | October 19, 2011, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Here’s something to think about. The police are out shooting animals with the intention of killing them. Animals have absolutely no cognitive ability they act solely on instinct, however a human being who clearly knows the difference between right and wrong and knows exactly what they are doing can drown their own children, rape their own children, dump their OWN CHILDS BODY IN THE WOODS TO ROT but they get a nice humane death, they get “put to sleep”. When we start hunting down murderers and child abusers and rapists and shooting them in the head then ill justify what you’re doing, until then WE are the animals
Posted by: Lauren | October 19, 2011, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
You terribly misunderstood my comment, and you’re not very good at reading, Lindsey did not make that post. I was in no way discounting the severity of the Holocaust or terrorism, quite the opposite. My point was simply that when innocent human lives are at stake, killing the threat has historically been a socially acceptable solution… Sorry that I confused you.
Posted by: Jim | October 19, 2011, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Don’t worry be happy! The police will protect you, just call 911. Nobody should carry weapons or firearms , you could accidentally hurt yourself or others. Plus what if a criminal obtains the firearms and uses it on you or your family?
Carry a cell phone, if you hear a roar or growl then call 911, the police will protect you.
Don’t worry be happy!
Marlin Perkins Jr
Posted by: Marlin Perkins | October 19, 2011, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
why were these animals in captivity in the first place?
I have read, they were declawed, de this and de that.
sounds like they were denatured.
wild animals should not be in captivity.
they belong in the wild,
thus, they are called wild animals.
zoos, and such should be outlawed.
humans do not need to go to an animal jail to enjoy what this planet has to offer.
i live in rural northern alberta ,
i see wild life every day, bears, coyotes , wolves, owls, lynx, cougars, deer, moose,elk, ect.
when we live to respect nature,
nature respects us back.
people who live in the city,
get your tent out and go on a camping trip,
sleep beneath the stars, feel the breeze on your face, sit by the campfire [even in the rain].
be quiet , listen, and watch…………………….,
experience the wild , the way it is meant to be
free and untouched by the hands of human beings.
I was brought up in the wilds of the the canadian rockies,
we kids ran the mountains like billy goats,
grizzly bears all over, black bears on the roof of our house,
no one was ever hurt.
my father taught us,
” do not fear nature, respect it.”
jewely from the canandian north
Posted by: jewely | October 19, 2011, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
It is my belief that as intelligent human beings all of these parents, and children, and their home pets, should just go INSIDE their homes and call the police when you see the animals. I think that it is terrible to shoot to kill these mostly endangered species of animals because a couple of the 7 billion humans on the earth could get hurt.
I know if this was going on near my home I would take my dogs inside and keep my eyes peeled out my window HOPING that one of those magnificent (YES, magnificent not man eating and evil) animals would come into my yard and I could call and get someone who would come and TRANQUILIZE them.
Seriously. All you need is a tranquilizer gun and you get the best of both worlds. Shoot to kill is the lazy man’s way out. I don’t give an F what any of you pretentious fools think about precious human life. The only difference between us and those animals is that we have the intelligence to wipe them off the planet. They just have the power to eat us one at a time.
If a child gets eaten… whose fault is it really? Their lazy parent for not keeping an eye on them.
Seriously us Americans are turning into lazy finger pointing slobs.
Posted by: Emily | October 19, 2011, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Um.. people… really..? inexcusable to shoot a wild animal capable of dissecting your innards in with its first attempt at eating you? do you people seriously think an animal’s life is in any way equatable to a human’s? The simple fact about this world is that Might Makes Right. Always has. Always will. Ever notice that even in this “sophisticated” society, those with enough money and power always have the lawyers they need to win legal cases? Might Makes Right even in our weakling-loving society. An animal is an animal. No Platos, no Aristotles, no Shakespears, no Newtons, no Einstiens, no visits to the moon… no achievements. There simply is nothing that can equate an animal’s worth to a human’s worth. Is it a shame to destroy life needlessly? Yes. Is it best to try non-lethal stuff? Probably. Is it WRONG to take an animal’s life? No.
I love animals. I love nature. But I’m also not irrational about either. You should keep a rational, intelligent head on your shoulders. Anything less is unreasonable.
You don’t blame water for being wet, but you do put a roof over your house. You direct a force of nature to be as you decide. You don’t blame an animal for mauling someone. You do kill it afterward. Yet again, you direct a force of nature to be as you decide. This ability to command the forces of nature is what makes humans different from animals. This is what makes us more valuable (confined by the obvious balance needed to keep an eco-sphere viable).
Killing one or two tigers that don’t belong in the North American eco-sphere won’t really make much of a difference at all.
To summarize the above statement for those that don’t like to read or think: Animals are animals, Humans are humans. Humans are more important than animals – because we decide so. Might Makes Right. Always has, always will. Might not be the most pleasant thought and it might not jive w/ how you wish to see the world, but how you WISH to SEE the world doesn’t change the world one bit.
Hope you enjoyed the rant and maybe it’ll get some small-minded people all fired up.
Posted by: CommonSense | October 19, 2011, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Wow…these cops DID NOT have to shoot and kill these animals! What a disgrace to the human race to act in this manner. I’m ashamed to be honest. I don’t understand why they had to kill all of these animals. Why can’t they just tranquilize them or do whatever non-lethal action they need to do. I understand the people come first but that seems like a fool-hearty decision to just shoot them. Maybe those cops need some more training on how to properly handle situations like these.
Posted by: DB | October 19, 2011, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
OBVIOUS SOLUTION…GUNS A BLAZIN GETS THE JOB DONE! What have we turned into as a country. Sounds like the Good Ol’ Boy approach to me. Scary… when can humans learn to use their brains again???
Posted by: Anon | October 19, 2011, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
I always wonder how people would respond if they had a choice between killing all remaining nonhuman predators on earth or letting one 80 year old be killed them – what would they choose?
Is there a breaking point where by true we would allow that animal life is as or more important the a limited number of human lives? After all, we know that automobiles will kill 30k people in the US every year, but we live with that choice. There are clearly many many things we could do to limit deaths from 30k to a much smaller number, but we don’t. Frankly, I am more concerned about releasing human murderers, rapists, pedophiles from jails – this goes on everyday all the time. Many animals close to extinction evolved over millions of years and they won’t be coming back once gone. Anyway, I vote for the animals and I vote against the criminals. And cars, boy they are hard to give up as is eating meat. I have nothing against eating meat, or killing animals per se, but I don’t want to see any animals extinct or nearly extinct, and it is worth paying a price for that. And no, just like with cars, you can’t predict who will pay that price.
Posted by: CommonSenseless | October 19, 2011, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Way to go OH, making the country look worse than it already is, now thats an accomplishment!!
Posted by: Amazing | October 19, 2011, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
They said that animal patrol came with tranquilizers and the police said to stand down they are out for shoot to kill. I hope those sheriffs burn in hell for being so inconsiderate and stubborn. And we wonder why all these natural disasters occur, mother earth needs to wipe out the human race for anything else to survive.
Posted by: Ally | October 19, 2011, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Law Enforcement are trained to preserve the sanctity of life. But because these are merely animals, they don’t have the same rights. A phone call to skilled professionals who could be flown in to tactically and efficiently round up the animals in a humane manner while minimizing the risk to humans shouldn’t be soo much to ask.
Posted by: crying | October 19, 2011, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Unbelievable. Shooting to kill when there is only a perceived danger and not an immediate threat. That’s ridiculous. They should have been tranquilized. Seeing a dead lion there breaks my heart.
Posted by: bill | October 19, 2011, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Jeffrey Dahmer ate more people than these animals.
Posted by: Dave Crockett | October 19, 2011, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
I’m going hunting in Ohio.
Posted by: The Bobicus | October 19, 2011, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
CommonSenseLess:
You raise some valid points, but keep in mind the scale and scope of what is being done here: 48 animals (from different branches on the animal kingdom tree) hardly constitute an extinction of entire species. If you read the caveat I mentioned above, Human life is more important than animal life so long as an eco-system remains viable. We are Stewards of this Earth. That means we get to make the decisions. A good steward would naturally tend towards maintaining the balance and viability of an eco-system. We human beings also have other duties as well: such as preserving the well-being of human life. When we have to make a judgment between those two duties we MUST remember to keep things in perspective:
What are the ramifications of choice A?
What are the ramifications of choice B?
etc..etc..etc…
One of the ways to confine the infinite cause-effect-effect-effect (etc…) is to determine how large or small the effects of those choices will be, relative to the mandates of our various duties. In this case, a complete Scorched Earth policy to all 48 animals won’t make much of a difference at all. I’m not advocating that, but I’m not against it either. What does bother me is how many people have already posted on this forum that they’re all aghast at killing these animals – as if they’re equal to humans. Simply put, they are NOT equal to humans. Anyone who says otherwise is a fool – and I’m astounded by how many fools have already commented here. Humans have the ability to leave this planet. We have a capacity to formulate infinitely complex concepts and somehow people think we’re the same as a dog, cat, bird, etc..? No people, there haven’t been any advances in society, religion, ethics, science, knowledge, etc. that have ever been contributed by an animal. No animal has ever conceived of space flight nor have any animals ever built skyscrapers. There are no monuments nor achievements that you can point to and say “There, see? That monument was done by .” or “This achievement was created by .”
Animals are not human. Deal with it, people.
btw, I’m completely w/ you on the murders thing – lock ‘em all up on an island somewhere… worked for Britain :-p (Sorry ’bout the jab, Australian readers)
Posted by: CommonSense | October 19, 2011, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
just an fyi … whatever abcnews uses to protect against Cross-Site-Scripting hijacks messed up my last post… the quoted sentences above should read:
“There, see? That monument was done by _insert animal of choice here_.”
and
“This achievement was created by _insert animal of choice here_.”
respectively.
(we’ll see if that makes it through)
Posted by: CommonSense | October 19, 2011, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
“Man-eaters?” Is that video clip joking? The animals were fed very recently, and had been receiving meals on a more regular basis than they would have in the wild. If they’ve been fed by people for such an extended period of time, they are going to expect people to feed them (potentially approaching with little signs of fear) but they aren’t going to immediately attack every person with which they come into contact.
There’s slightly more concern to be had over whether they would attack small children, but please spare me. They need to shoot to kill all of these animals? Did anyone consult biologists or animal ethologists in this situation, or were they too busy being in a panic?
Posted by: Kita | October 19, 2011, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
One of the lions ate one of the escaped monkeys..people were next.
Posted by: Kim | October 19, 2011, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Some of these animals are endangered, that’s why you should try and capture them alive. Most people don’t realize that animals were on this planet long before humans. Now there are hardly any left.
Posted by: w m warwick | October 19, 2011, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
So killing of giraffs and Camels are okay…what are they gonna do..Lick you to death….!!!!! Apparently they are doing nothing to preserve the harmless animals….Animal Rights activist need to come down hard on this state!!!
Posted by: Lisa | October 19, 2011, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
why is it that humans think they are the only animal on earth, and also seem to forget that we are animals as well? you’re in the boons of Ohio you can afford a couple more hours in front of your TV watching the price is right while reasonable, caring humans(if there are any left) track the animals down and transport them somewhere safe. with these species going extinct the number of animals on this preserve should have been a Godsend, not a catastrophe.
Posted by: KK | October 19, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
I live in this area and I am saddened by the people on this blog that consider a lion or bears life to be worth more than my life or the lives of my children. So what you are saying is if I was killed by a bear it’s O.K., but if the bear was killed while attacking me then our sheriffs are horrible human beings? Have a zoo of wild animals let loose in your back yard and then judge. People who have no idea what they are talking about should just not say anything at all because it just proves your stupidity. This is not a game or a movie where there is always a happy ending. I am safe and my family is safe and for that I am very grateful.
Posted by: Jennifer | October 19, 2011, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
I have no problem with them putting down these animals if they attacked someone. However, these animals didn’t attack or hurt anyone. I know the next question…Well dont give them the chance right? Just shoot them before they hurt anyone. This is a difficult subject to talk. We have no idea if these animals were going to hurt anyone or not. Most likely they were not going to hurt anyone. It seems as if the officers acted out of the fear that they may hurt someone. In my opinion, that is a rash decision and this was all carried out wayyyyy to quickly. In this same light, we should also execute any human who has the capability of killing any other human, which is pretty much everyone. The argument that it was to kill all of these animals is ludicrous, especially the camels and giraffes? WTF..why dont those officers run around and shoot all the dogs and cats running loose as well, they could potentially hurt someone to ya know. Sounds like the cops in OH had a nice legal exotic animal hunting spree if you ask me.
Posted by: Dave | October 19, 2011, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
You know what? If a bunch of wild zoo animals were let loose in my backyard then I wouldnt go out there! Also, did those animals attack you or your children? Did they attack anyone? No and no. This was just a move that was not thought out by anyone who carried it away. It was purely driver by fear with no REAL reason or evidence that this needed to be done. I am sad the way these OH officers acted. This could have been done in a much better way. :(
Posted by: Anon | October 19, 2011, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
ANON (and all the people who’ve posted similar):
Do you really wait until a crisis is UPON YOU to do your planning? If you do, I sure as hell hope I never have to rely on your planning skills. Part of being intelligent (if you are) is knowing a reasonable danger exists and doing something about it. This is one of the biggest distinctions between humans and animals. Only a fool would wait until a tiger is gnawing on his/her kid’s head to do something. Only an idiot would espouse waiting to act until the lion was munching on his/her loved one’s body to think “I wonder, what should I do..?”.
So the simple question for you is: What are you thinking (if you are) when you say there is “no REAL reason or evidence that this needed to be done.” ???
Please, turn your brains on before posting, people.
JENNIFER: I hope you and your family are and remain safe and know that there is at least one human being out there who values your lives over an un-intelligent, un-tamed, less-than-human animal. As for all the rest of you fools out there who think a lion is more important than a human baby… I hope this DOES happen in your back yard – it’d clean out the gene pool quite nicely.
Posted by: CommonSense | October 19, 2011, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Clearing up some Cheetah ignorance: Cheetahs are about the size of a large dog, with a small head, long legs, non-retractable claws, and are very skittish around humans. They may hook smaller prey with their claws but are more than likely to hiss or hide if a human were to appear.
Killing these animals is sickening. Understandable about the larger more vicious animals and tranquilizers not working soon enough, but with regards to smaller animals, shooting them is unforgivable. The state should be ashamed of their lax regulations and in no circumstances should only one person be allowed to answer for ownership on dangerous animals.
Posted by: PurpleCheetah | October 19, 2011, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
“These are wild animals, wild animals that you would see on TV in Africa,”
Police describe the animals as “mature, very big and aggressive.”
Maybe they need to send these cops to clear out National Parks such as Yellowstone … that many potentially dangerous animals around all those tourists?
“This is a bad situation,” Mutz said. “It’s been a bad situation for a long time and the last thing we want to do is have any of our public hurt.”
My sentiments exactly Mutz … the quicker you can get in there an eliminate all of them the better off people will be
Posted by: Damon | October 19, 2011, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
If everybody was keeping up on the news they would know that there were NO camels or giraffes on the property. So please stop saying that they shot camels and giraffes. Jack Hanna already confirmed there were NO camels or giraffes involved. Rumors are flying around all over the place. Just because your brother, friend, or neighbor told you something doesn’t make it true. Just in case you didn’t know, rumors are not always facts. AGAIN THERE WERE NO GIRAFFES OR CAMELS INVOLVED!!! No need to pass your judgement on this subject anymore because it’s not a fact. Talk about our sheriffs reacting too fast.
Posted by: Jennifer | October 19, 2011, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
This is ridiculous they should have tried better to save these animals, tigers are going extinct people aren’t so yes I think they should have bothered to try. people could stay in there house and they would be fine so this is bull.
Posted by: Shammara Al-Darraji | October 19, 2011, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
What a bunch of yay-hoos. Seriously? They head out with gun and testosterone before calling humane society and zoos? These animals could have been tranq’ed and placed in appropriate environments, but now, gosh, there are some little men with guns strutting around feeling all proud..”yuk yuk! I done shot me a tiger, ma!” Obscene.
Posted by: Dawn | October 19, 2011, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
I live in zanesville and I feel sick that all the innocent animals had to die, for what? They was caged pets scared and set loose they did nothing wrong. Not one person was hurt the Sherrif officers caused panic telling everyone to stay in closing schools (Lutz) thinks he is always wright I feel he made a big mistake , they could have done anything else but kill all them innocent wonderful animals , this is just sick
Posted by: J.D. | October 19, 2011, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
I want to know what all of the people in this thread saying “SAVE THE ANIMALS!” would have done in this situation.
Remember, the police department doesn’t carry tranquilizers. Animal Control does. Even so, they probably don’t have enough tranquilizer to take down 51 wild animals. And even so, it takes minutes to take effect (which means you have to wait while it runs around, and even then it might not even have gotten the tranq drugs).
Also, tranq guns have to be shot at a very close range. No more than about 100 ft. And you only get one shot at a time, and have to reload it (which takes a minute or so to do if you’re highly trained).
This was a town in rural Ohio. These people were not trained, nor equipped to capture all 51 of these animal. Even if they were trained and equipped, it still would have been difficult. And even with all the difficulties they faced, they managed to capture 6 of them.
These were not gun-toting rednecks. These were just normal people whose job it was to protect the citizens of the surrounding area. They did the best they could, and though it is horrible, there wasn’t really another option.
“Hanna led a team of experts who arrived with four tranquilizer guns late Tuesday in an effort to corral the animals. He said the drugs take several minutes to subdue an animal even with a good shot, and one tiger had to be killed Wednesday afternoon when it turned on a veterinarian after being hit with a tranquilizer dart.”
and there were no camels or Giraffes so drop it
Posted by: mrokey | October 19, 2011, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Jack Hanna said it’s not as easy to tranquilize animals as people think it is. He, as one of the most famous animal lovers in this country, said that the officers had no choice but to shoot. It hurts to read so many negative comments about the officers that had to do what they had to do. We are not a bunch of stupid hillbillies or ignorant hicks because we live in a small town. We are people just like you, who just happen to have been faced with an awful situation. Living in the city doesn’t make you smarter and you have no idea how your own police officers would have reacted in the same situation. Nobody is proud of anything that has happened here in the last 24 hours. We are sad and hope that something like this never happens again, anywhere. Matt Lutz is a great sheriff and our officers work hard to protect us everyday. I’m sorry to burst everybody’s bubble but no one is having fun with this, it’s sad. Think what you want but it really takes a small mind to think anyone would be enjoying something like this. We may live in a rural area but it doesn’t mean we are savages. Quit stereotyping us because it’s just plain rude and ignorant.
Posted by: Debbie | October 19, 2011, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
At least two people have been killed at exotic animal farms in Ohio by the animals. One by a bear (the keeper feeding the bear) and one by a Bengal tiger (the owners two year old son).
Posted by: Larry | October 19, 2011, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
This is a horrible story. Unfortunately, another example of animal cruelty and this seems to be one of the worst cases.
With no laws in place to protect these animals, they are allowed to live in unstable and poor quarters, in small areas (whether its numerous acres or a smaller scale) that are not regularly checked by any agency with no regulations.
These animals have no choice or vote but to be where ever they were sold/traded/exported/imported and then placed.
Then this happens; Owner of exotic animal allows it to go too far, get near a person, attacks someone out of frustration, or in this case, lets them loose. From there the scared animal does what any animal would do, attacks, acts out, looks for food they have maybe not received in some time, etc. and the animal then is putting human life in danger and is hunted down and killed.
Stricter animal laws must be passed. This is not the fault of the community that is now in fear of what lurks around corners, or the animal out looking for food to hunt or eat, it falls on the law makers in Ohio who allow these situations to take place. More than the guy who wanted to own all of them, more than the guy that sold him the animals. The lawmakers need to recognize what their responsibility is and make changes because this is a complete no win for any one.
Posted by: Amanda Wren | October 20, 2011, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Who cares about humans….save the animals! Come on people, are you serious?? I will never understand a person who values an animals life over a person. So many people who commented on here said “they most likely would not have attacked”. How the bleep do you know? Why even give them the chance? And the person who said “have you ever seen a cheetah mauling”? LOL…do you think they would just stop and play with a person? They are wild animals, whether they were kept in a cage or not! If you are going to be mad at someone, be mad at the owner, he didn’t have to let them out.
Posted by: Jennie | October 20, 2011, 12:18 am 12:18 am
I can see a lot insane people on this thread, if you have ever been attacked by a wild dog I am sure next time you see a not-so-friendly dog you will shot at it first before saying anything not to talk of wild big cats that jumping at you is enough to knock life at of your body before settling down to perform a cesarean section on you! Where is human sanity? They said wild big aggressive cats are on loose and you are saying they should tranquilize them, have you forgotten those carts in questions are best of hunters?
Posted by: Phemy | October 20, 2011, 3:36 am 3:36 am
I understand that the citizens of Zanesville were very concerned for the safety of their families. I also understand that the town had budget constraints, but that the proprietor of the farm had drawn the attention of local law enforcement who could have requested tranquilizers in the event of such an event. Money is hard to come by, however, and that may not have been possible even with the clearest of foresight.
I am relieved that no person was harmed by these animals. That was a serious possibility. I am also appalled by the anthropocentric position taken by many of the posters here. Humans are animals. We simply have the power to dictate what happens to all other animals on this planet because we have the technology to do so. But that ability has come from hundreds of thousands of years of evolution. It is not magic, it is adaptation, and we abuse it when we value the lives of humans above all else. Humans can be wretched, disgusting animals; capable of far worse than hunting prey for food, or mauling a predator. Of course people love their children and want to protect them from harm, but the real harm is in clinging to the notion that humans are exempt from the laws of nature. I regret that these beautiful animals were killed, but I hope that it will serve as a lesson to those who think they can control other, maybe greater, animals simply because they can hold a gun or a key.
Posted by: CatCat | October 20, 2011, 3:38 am 3:38 am
I just watched the disturbing news footage of the dozens of beautiful animals: lions, tigers, cheetahs, bears, and wolves lying dead. Nothing but innocent victims of a bloody massacre at the hasty, inept hands of Ohio law enforcement. My heart aches, my eyes cry, and my blood boils to know the fear and pain these precious and magnificent creatures endured in their final moments of imprisoned lives. What is wrong with a world that tortures the guiltless and embraces the guilty??? Why can an angry man walk into a southern California hair salon, brutally murder eight beloved, irreplaceable people, thereby leaving his own child parent-less; Only to be peacefully apprehended by police and calmly taken into custody, where, for the next several years, he will waste millions of tax-payer dollars on preserving his own life through his incarceration, defense motions, and trials??? However, why can a animal sanctuary owner who supposedly committed suicide and was apparently disturbed enough to willingly release his sinless prisoners, immediately sentence these wondrous (and endangered) animals to instant death by a law-enforcement agency too trigger happy and too afraid to be rationally compassionate??? Our world, our intellect, our empathy is seriously flawed.
To all the animal-haters and the absolute dictators who believe that man has the ultimate right to do and act however he wants, think again. MAN is the WORST animal among us, for we are responsible for not only our own misery, but the suffering of every other being on this planet. There is no might makes right because God Almighty created every animal with as much love and foresight as any other. Educate yourselves… For in the beginning, God created the animals as Adam’s companions, and only when He saw Adam still longing, did He then create Eve.
Man is the steward of this earth, not the dictatorial annihilator. Man is supposed to have the highest intelligence and rationale of all creatures so that we can mange our earth’s resources and our fellow companion’s with care and compassion and respect for all. Those of us who care so passionately for our animal friends is because we value and empathize with ALL of God’s creations. We grasp the revelation that animals are at the mercy of our hands and so they need our mercy to survive. Do not disrespect us or label us with your ridiculous accusations that we love animals at the expense of humans. None of us wished for any human to be harmed. None of us wanted your children eaten or your spouses mauled. None of us wanted there to be a deadly showdown between a tiger and a mother. What we wanted was a way for all to survive a catastrophic circumstance in which no one but man was at fault, and yet, no one but the ANIMALS were EXECUTED.
There are so many accounts of what happened yet conclusively we know these animals were maintained in captivity and were used to humans. They were not the blood-thirsty, vicious, predators savagely prowling for the townsfolk that so many of you are trying to portray. Although many people sited them and encountered them, listen to the 9-1-1 calls, not one person even came close to being a victim of these animals, so why the mass-hysteria and the mass-assassinations??? For those of us who are outraged it is because so much more should have been done to at least try and save them. Many of them were gun-downed trying to get back to their enclosures. How ignorant, lazy, revolting, and disgustingly cold-hearted is that???
To those who wish to respond that there is no God, don’t waste my time. Whether you believe in Him or not, He exists. Whether you believe in Him or not, there is a payday someday where each of us will all answer for what we have done and what we have failed to do. Ohio failed!!! Yet rest easy y’all, because now all the big, bad animals are permanently DEAD!!!
Posted by: Justine | October 20, 2011, 4:11 am 4:11 am
For those of you calling us (people who actually care about the innocent lives of these majestic creatures) stupid, turn around and look at the law enforcement protecting you. They are FULLY aware of the slack laws on exotic animals in your area, yet they don’t feel it necessary to keep tranquilizers in stock? I’d be more afraid othe stupidity of your police than these animals
Posted by: lauren | October 20, 2011, 9:37 am 9:37 am
HA HA HA! I appreciate all of the sane minded people out there that understand that the safest way to take control of this situation was to kill the animals. There is no need for me to go into reason why because I believe many of you did a very good job with this. However there is a need to explain why the ones who were against killing these animals are wrong. None of you were able to intelligently defend your position of “they shouldn’t have killed these animals.” First off tranquilizing them is extremely difficult. With every minute that passed with these animals loose they ran the risk of the animals getting farther away and having to spend additional time and resources searching for them. I am a hunter and with the proper training it is difficult enough to safely harvest these types of animals. To do this to 40+ highly dangerous animals with the resources available is absurd. They didn’t even have the man power available with the proper knowledge on tranquilizing these animals. That being said, no what do you people propose they do with these animals if they somehow were able to capture them? Yet again there is no logical answer. I am not a vicious killer. Yes I hunt, but if you ask anyone who knows me I have a bigger heart for animals than for human beings. I will give to an animal charity before I give to the poor. I have and will continue to pull over and move a turtle out of the road or slow down for a squirrel.
In this situation though this was the BEST option available. It’s not a good thing that happened but it was the best outcome with the resources available.
Posted by: Dominic | October 20, 2011, 10:23 am 10:23 am
@Dominic once captured we propose they put them in a freaking zoo? Or a sanctuary? And like I said if the police aren’t smart enough to keep heavy tranquilizers in stock knowing the law and knowing about all these animals being there then its truely their own stupidity
Posted by: lauren | October 20, 2011, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Oh and for those of you who think these animals are vicious and unable to be tamed why don’t you go read about the two people that raised a lion and set it free into the wild and came back forty years later and the lion not only remembered them he ran to greet them and licked their faces how is that any different from your dog or cat? More people die from being attacked by pit bulls than jungle cats. My brother was bitten in the face by a dog he had known his whole life and taken care of. He had to have hundreds of stitches and numerous plastic surgeries and by the grace of God you can barely tell. My point being any animal is capable of hurting someone should we just kill them all?
Posted by: lauren | October 20, 2011, 10:53 am 10:53 am
lauren more people get attacked by pit bulls because there are more pit bulls then jungle cats? and for all the people out there saying they shouldnt kill them……your being completely ignorant and not even contemplating what these animals can do! they all have a natural instinct to kill things and defend themselves idc how long they have been in captivity…….if your little daughter or son was walking out to the front yard to do something and there was a tiger would you say oh lets go get the tranq and shoot it and hopefully it falls before it reaches my child no the safest thing for these police officers to do for the people which are more important than animals…..i love animals and think its sad that they have to die but its what has to happen the one you need to blame is the law for allowing this man to have these animals and the man for having them in the first place so please stop with this animal rights thing and think about how you would feel driving down the interstate with a lion and tiger running next to your car would you want to say oh they will tranq them in a few hours when they get it all ready? no you want them to kill it so you dont die yourself people are so stupid these days
Posted by: dillan | October 20, 2011, 11:43 am 11:43 am
The pictures of the murder of these majestic animals were sickening. Hopefully none of these animals will end up on a trophy wall in some cops house. Oh wait, maybe these cops can now be called great white hunters. Where were the tranquilzers and tranq guns? If the law knew these animals were in enclosures at some ones house why were they not prepared for any eventuallity. This country is trigger happy, we do not try to prevent a problem, we wait until a tragedy happens and then we bring out the guns. These animals were not at fault, they did nothing wrong but were brutally murdered. Have not heard of any animals threatening any human, but they were killed anyway. The cops were not prepared and had not clue what to do but shoot. So if a big dog growls at me, I can now shoot it first and ask questions later, and the owner of the big dog cannot sue me for the death of the dog that growled at me? Same difference, dogs and cats were once wild and if they are treated badly they will attack even if they are so-called domestic animals. This is a sad time for endangered animals.
Posted by: Vicki | October 20, 2011, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
i would have had a heartattack if lions were free where i live, wth?????????? cheetahs would have loved to have seen though…i’m surprised the animals didnt turn on each other when they were set free. they had to shoot to kill, no time for a tranqillizer gun to work quick, these are man eating animals, only way to do it unfortunatly, i hate lions but this is just unnessarry. :(
Posted by: bev | October 20, 2011, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
After an all-night hunt that extended into Wednesday afternoon, 48 animals were killed. Six others — three leopards, a grizzly bear and two monkeys — were captured and taken to the Columbus Zoo. A wolf was later found dead, leaving a monkey as the only animal still on the loose…….fyi the monkey on the loose has herpes!! I am sure that isn’t the only one who had it. I love animals, my kids and I area always watching Nat Geo Wild. It is very sad, but these cops had no choice. These animals where trying to get into house, so staying indoor wasn’t a option when the animals was trying to get into your house.
Posted by: JoAnna | October 20, 2011, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Does any one know were I can find the online petition to sign. I am outraged. this is just sad!
Posted by: mel | October 20, 2011, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
PEOPLE…………some people have no idea what they are talking about!
Posted by: shirley | October 20, 2011, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Well maybe this stupid area that this reserve was located, should have come up with a backup plan in case something like this ever happened. So great job fellow Americans, blame yourself for the deaths of these animals for lack of your intelligence.
Posted by: amber | October 20, 2011, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Wild animals kill to eat and to protect themselves; the only defenses they have!
Man is the only animal who does NOT have to kill to survive, and yet, he does kill every day, in every way because he enjoys killing and/or he is purely evil!
Posted by: Justine | October 20, 2011, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
yes. the animal lovers are right. it’s not the animals fault. and it does take a while for tranqs to work, but that’s ok. let the innocent animals run free and kill up all of the humans they encounter. then we will truly learn from this, and no animals will have to be harmed.
Posted by: sasha | October 21, 2011, 12:35 am 12:35 am
WoW!! What an embarrassment!
So let me see if I understand this correctly….
1) Ohio allows any adult to collect and handle live, dangerous, exotic animals.
2) Ohio does not require ANY specific reasoning or specialized training, licensing, or property for an individual to house dangerous exotic animals.
3) Ohio does not impose a limit on the number of dangerous exotic animals a person can own and house on their private property.
4) Ohio does not have the budget/resources to properly handle a SINGLE case of ONE individual who all too easily opened cages to free the dangerous exotic animals on his property, when there are many more such individuals within the state who also own such animals and who may at any time exercise their free will to let them loose.
LACK.OF.COMMON.SENSE
My heart goes out to all those poor animals. My hope is for a return to common sense for a change and that those animals shot and killed didn’t lose their lives for nothing.
Who are we to think we can own and mistreat such animals and then dispose of them so easily in the name of “safety”? A disgrace!!
Posted by: Stacey | October 21, 2011, 2:56 am 2:56 am
The animals were not at fault.
The cops should have shown restraint.
No one but the previos owner was harmed.
God will put those zealots that killed the poor animals in the hottest part of hell where no beer is served.
Posted by: m allmon | October 22, 2011, 6:48 am 6:48 am
I hope by “shoot” they mean with really big bullets. if they’re tranq-ing these things that’s inexcusable….because unexcusable isn’t a word.
Posted by: NotGay | November 21, 2011, 11:05 am 11:05 am