Oct 27, 2011 4:37pm

‘Occupy’ Protests Cost Cities Millions

ap scott olsen occupy wall street oakland ll 111027 wblog Occupy Protests Cost Cities Millions

Iraq War veteran Scott Olsen, 24, lays on the ground bleeding from a head wound after being struck by a by a projectile during an Occupy Wall Street protest in Oakland, Calif., Oct. 25, 2011. (Jay Finneburgh/AP Photo)

With tensions mounting daily, the name Scott Olsen has become a national rallying cry for the Occupy Wall Street movement.

Olsen, a 24-year-old Iraq veteran, is in serious condition after suffering a fractured skull during clashes with police in Oakland.

He joined the protests after work Tuesday night and suffered his head wound when police fired tear gas into the crowd during the crackdown. People who came to his aid were then scattered by a gas canister tossed by police.

In an effort to show solidarity with Olsen and their counterparts in Oakland, protesters in New York City marched to City Hall on Wednesday night. The demonstration led to a tense confrontation with police and 10 arrests.

Today, the police union said officers had showed restraint but the union would sue any protester who injured an officer.

So are the confrontations entering a dangerous new stage?

Many city officials are under pressure from constituents tired of unsightly tent cities, dead grass and dangerous conditions. The cost to already struggling municipalities, which must protect and clean up after the protesters, is soaring.

“We know for a fact we’ve crossed the $300,000 threshold in terms of money spent so far for this operation,” said Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed.

In San Francisco, the bill is more than $100,000.

“It’s just something that has to happen, it’s a worldwide movement,” said protester Dustin Sneed, who has been at the San Francisco protest since the beginning.

Across the country, the figures are growing. In New York City, overtime costs are $3.4 million. In Minneapolis, the sheriff’s department reports spending $200,000. And in Boston, the tally is $2 million and counting.

 

SHOWS:

User Comments

Whatever the cost to the cities, occupiers = taxpayers. They are paying for their own cities.
What about multimillion dollar defense and financial firms that have sucked millions of taxpayer dollars FROM cities? There is no report on that – yet protestors are being blamed for “costing” cities.

NOPE. Sorry, you got it wrong. Maybe the focus of the mainstream media needs to change? Let’s talk about that cost. Huh?

Posted by: Zora | October 27, 2011, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Get these anarchists out of our cities. They are polluting and hurting the ability for the average American citizen to do business. They are criminals and should be treated as such. I support any action to clean these human scum from the streets, their stench is too much…

Posted by: muman613 | October 27, 2011, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Excuse me, but unless the protestors asked for the cities to provide anything extra beyond what the cities normally do then the cities CHOSE to do extra things that cost them extra money. That is NOT the fault of the protestors.

Posted by: B-K KnightRider | October 27, 2011, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

The deregulated and poorly regulated finance industry is costing the cities MORE money. Mortgage fraud and securities fraud has resulted in cities and other government entities as well as retirement funds losing money from the investment in sliced and diced mortgage backed securities that were AAA rated, but weren’t worth the paper they were printed on. Knowing that the debors didn’t have a prayer of paying on them in a timely manner brokers skimmed a tidy profit as well. Both the debors and the purchaeers of those debts got cheated, but the brokers, bankers and investment houses have made out like pirates, which is what they are.

Posted by: yooperfarmer | October 27, 2011, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Zora is 100% correct, TRILLIONS have been lost on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, while hundreds of BILLIONS were lost when the financial industry took one too many gambles at taxpayer expense in a game of high-stakes poker using mortgage-backed securities as the play currency.

Let’s worry about the big fish before we worry about the guppies. Let’s worry about corporate executives who’ve seen their INFLATION-ADJUSTED income explode by over 275% in the last 30 years before we worry about union workers or minimum-wage workers who’ve been economically stagnant in that same span of time. Let’s worry about people who actually control enough wealth to bring national economies to their knees.

Posted by: Andy Fernandez | October 27, 2011, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

What is wrong with nitwits one and three here?

Nitwit 1 (Zora the Nitwit): Defense firms only give money to cities in the form of property tax and other fees (along with employing people who then contribute to property tax, sales tax, etc.). They may divert federal dollars (if they sell things to our government) or foreign dollars (if they sell things to foreign governments). The company my dad works for does both (in Milwaukee), which is the norm. And financial firms do the same generally, unless you mean the stock market crash, but that has been in the media endlessly for the past three years… Additionally, the occupiers are self-proclaimed poor, so how much could they really be paying in taxes of any kind? Otherwise, they’re just lying hypocrite scum (okay, I admit that’s not infeasible). And what makes you think they come from the cities they are trashing? Most of them are too smart for that – all the news stories are about how they come from surrounding areas.

Nitwit 2 (the BK Nitwit): My first response is an agape mouth, but I’ll try to put your idiocy into words. What is it that you imagien the cities are doing? Paying for lattes to give out to the Occupiers? That would be a choice. Paying for the damage these thugs cause to city property and for safety of otgher citizens and Occupiers themselves ain’t a choice (if an Occupier would, G-d forbid, get hurt, you don’t think she’s sue the city for everything it’s got?).

And this is why you idiots don’t govern our country yet – we still have more of a meritocracy than an idiocracy. Though that could change any decade now… I wish you’d all move to one state (sorry victim state) and have your failed society over there away from the rest of us.

Posted by: David | October 27, 2011, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

POSTED BY: B-K KNIGHTRIDER | OCTOBER 27, 2011, 5:01 PM+++How about the extra police needed to keep these dumbasses in line. You people can be so stupid…

Posted by: william | October 27, 2011, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Not to mention the fact that many small businesses in these areas are losing money hand over fist because of these losers camped out in front of where they work.

Posted by: jackson | October 27, 2011, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

why dosen’t ABC comment on the fact that this “occupy wall street” thing is being goaded on and paid for by an X Accorn excec. and billionaire Soros, the same one that starts these riots for his own gains. He’s made billions by taking down countries, his own words.

Posted by: Erma | October 27, 2011, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Why do they need such a large police presence in the first place?

Posted by: Don'tTrustAnyoneOver40 | October 27, 2011, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

The problem here is simple. We are witnessing another symptom of the “tragedy of the commons”. If we all own this property then we should all be able to do what we want with it… or on it. The problem is, we actually do not own it, even though we are forced to pay for it (taxes). The government is stuck in a catch 22 because it needs to make all sides happy if it is to remain relevant. Those that want to protest and those that want to get to work both have equal right to the use of public property. The rest of us naively sit and bicker about which side is right.

Neither side is right in this issue. The problem is that the concept of public property is absolutely WRONG and causes us these sorts of headaches all the time. Do yourselves all a favor and start exploring what free societies are and how anarchic systems, based on property rights, solve these headaches. Until this happens you all sound like a bunch of spoiled babies fighting about which side mommy and daddy government should take. Government is the problem… not the people protesting or the people wanting to get to work. ;)

Posted by: Jay | October 27, 2011, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Why do they need such a large police presence in the first place?

POSTED BY: DON’TTRUSTANYONEOVER40 | OCTOBER 27, 2011, 5:53 PM++++Imagine one police officer telling 300 protesters to vacate the premises and the loons won’t move…..

Posted by: jackson | October 27, 2011, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

All I can say. is Politicians and Police and all public employees have fogotten that they are nothing but SERVANTS! and I’ll be damned if some servant thinks it can do what ever it feels like. I say time to show them how a servant ought to act! first by puting them in their place, by any means neccassary. and yes to all you dum dums out there. It’s plain ENGLISH, by any MEANS NECCASSARY. I was a public servant too, a United States Marine to be exact and I knew that the highest ranknig member was from the richest citizen to the poorest of bums on the corner. Since even a Homeless U.S. Citizen is above the United States President. He is under their feet for all reasons in accordance to the United States Constition. I may be at the bottom of the tax bracket, but guess what. the servant ought to be beneath my feet. and before anyone of you gets all rowdy. don’t forget that the servants only pay back a fraction of what they take in taxes, which only serves to pay them later.

Posted by: SERVANTSLIfeLINECUTTER | October 27, 2011, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Zora-What about multimillion dollar defense and financial firms that have sucked millions of taxpayer dollars FROM cities? +++Are you for real? Do you know how many cities would love to have a major defense contractor setup shop near their city?

Posted by: jenny | October 27, 2011, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Occupy protest cost cities millions!?!? That’s the local government fault — it’s their choice. Truth of the matter, it’s the police that are causing all of the problems, not the protestors!! And, Mr. Mainstream Media, you are very much aware of that fact!

Posted by: Dan | October 27, 2011, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Most of this money is being spent to “protect the protestors,” as the article puts it. Like they protected Scott Olsen by shooting him in the head with a tear gas canister because he was peacefully protesting in accordance with his 1st amendment rights. And of course, it all comes out of Scott Olsen’s taxes, and yours, and mine.

Posted by: JB Mason | October 27, 2011, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

These protesters have a legitimate gripe as do I, likely you, as do the rest of the mere mortals in our society. It doesn’t get any more American than this. I am grateful that there are people such as these protesters willing to put themselves out there in an effort to represent me. Thanks!

Posted by: Dave | October 27, 2011, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

I guess the billions of dollars that Washington gave away to Wall Street and the “Too Big To Fail” companies is somehow less important that whatever the Occupy movement is costing the cities. Its becoming clearer every day that free speech and the right to protest peacefully are outdated notions… (sarcasm and irony. deep irony)

Posted by: whatever | October 27, 2011, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

I’m sure Scott Olsen was carrying around a big neon sign that stated he was a veteran. What makes you guys think that vets are not capable of making dumb decisions and should be excused for making them?

Posted by: Terry | October 27, 2011, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

There are several glaring inaccuracies and omissions in the article.

1. When unarmed people came to help Scott, who was seriously injured, the police threw a flash grenade (not a gas canister as you falsely report) – even when these people posed zero threat. If you had taken 1 minute to review the video of the event that is available you would see this.

2. Billionaires and celebs regularly get extra police protection even escorts at much greater cost to the taxpayers than all the occupy protests combined. The banks like Goldman get a variety of special favors from the NYPD at much greater cost.

you guys had michael jackson as the lead story most of the day with 80 percent pure tabloid content on your top stories, and yet you can’t even get the basic facts of this story right?

Posted by: InacurateArticle | October 27, 2011, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

I wish the protestors would presented the media with a focused script. Narrow things down, clearly define things, and have a list of demands. In the 60′s each protest had a single message. Each protest had a single demand. Come on, focus, people.

Posted by: Wayne | October 27, 2011, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

I seen nothing wrong with what happened at Kent State, The beating of Rodney King and any person who wants to stop a gas gernade with their head.

Posted by: Fred Newcombe | October 27, 2011, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

The banker cost us BILLIONS & what you see as OWS movment is tip of iceberg there is army of thousands to support this movment they just waching how the1% reacts to freedom of speech.

Posted by: reza 2 | October 27, 2011, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Occupy protest cost cities millions!?!? That’s the local government fault — it’s their choice. Truth of the matter, it’s the police that are causing all of the problems, not the protestors!! And, Mr. Mainstream Media, you are very much aware of that fact!

Posted by: Dan
__________________________
Now let’s see. The protesters defecate on cars, destroy property, and occupy areas which are against the law to occupy. The police try to keep them from vandalizing , and order them off the property that is clearly against the law for them to occupy. The police are the ones who cause the problems.

Wonderful logic Dan

Even the IMF protesters who come to DC on a regular basis to protest are able to obey the laws. The police are there, yes, but they sit and do absolute nothing.

Posted by: spike | October 27, 2011, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

At least the tea party has respect for other peoples property and were not arrested in mass numbers.

Posted by: jenny | October 27, 2011, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

To InacurateArticle: Here’s a few inaccuracies I found in your post.

1) When several people approach cops in a riot formation, they’re handled as a threat. The cops had probably already called for medics for Mr. Olsen. Its not the job of the unruly mob to treat his wounds.

2) Billionaires and celebs PAY for police protection, its not free. And any favors you think the police do for banks is dead wrong. They have their own security firms, if they hire off-duty cops, they pay for that themselves.

3) And since you think the cops are thugs, maybe you should tell your brethren in San Fran to stop throwing kitchen utensils and frying pans at the police, and to obey permit and park hours. If you go home at night and protest during legal hours, people will be FAR more accepting of your cause. And with a shower, they might even pass within a few feet of you without retching.

Instead, you look like a bunch of itinerant bums living in tents made by the very corporations you protest against, trashing businesses’ bathrooms, and leaving the places you “occupy” worse than when you arrived. That doesn’t make you look like protesters, it makes you look like slobs, slackers, and unhygienic bums.

Posted by: Phydeux | October 27, 2011, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

I have always loved it when the circus comes to town all the clowns and tattoed people with piercings. They should sell more popcorn at these events.

Posted by: bobby | October 27, 2011, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

So what we will print more money.

Posted by: Matt | October 27, 2011, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

I have to say I got some grins last night when my husband and I were driving down Hawthorne Blvd. in Torrance, CA last night. Torrance is a relatively affluent suburb of Los Angeles, and is about a forty-five minute bus-ride away from downtown LA, where most of the SoCal “Occupy Wall Street” protesters are camped out.

I’ll be darned if there weren’t about a dozen people standing on the curb near Torrance’s “restaurant row,” waving signs and otherwise trying to draw attention. I guess the downtown LA “Occupy Wall Street” action is too gritty for these people: they were staging their protest just across from the Del Amo mall and near the nice restaurants, all nice and comfortable and convenient.

I guess whatever floats your boat…I’m grateful I live in a place where there’s freedom to demonstrate, no matter how ridiculous the demonstrators are.

Posted by: Lomita momcat | October 27, 2011, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Having problems posting…testing…

Posted by: cat whisperer | October 27, 2011, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

To InacurateArticle: Here’s a couple inaccuracies in your posting.

1) When protesters approach cops in a riot formation they’re considered a threat. If Mr. Olsen was hurt, the cops can handle calling for an ambulance and getting him clear of the mess. They don’t need you to help just because you “feel he’s one of yours”.

2) Billionaires, celebs, and even firms like Goldman-Sachs have to PAY for special police details. It ain’t free, and it ain’t cheap. So don’t act like the cops are “cozy” with them because they’re not.

And to Dan: Its not the police’s fault, its the protesters’ fault. The cops are doing their job and enforcing the rules society has agreed upon, they’re called laws. If you can’t protest and do it within the framework of the law, that makes you a vigilante at best, and a criminal at worst. And you have no justification for complaining when the law is enforced. You take on the bull, you get the horns, its as simple as that.

Like the song says, “I fought the law, and the law won!” Follow the law and more of us will listen to your cause.

Posted by: Jon | October 27, 2011, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

What is the option? Just everyone pack up and take their complaints, frustrations and anger home? Forget about the right to assembly and just do as they are told? I encourage and support people finally speaking out. Where have they been for the past ten years. Where were they when we invaded Iraq against all common sense and legal authority? And people don’t think there are unethical, unbelievable acts still happening? Did anyone follow the story of Gov. Dennis Daugaard of South Dakota accepting $110K per year from the Children’s Home Society while he was a sitting Lt. Gov. and influenced the placement of thousands of native American children in group homes instead of with their families? This is the kind of horrible truths that anger people and make them feel helpless that the rich and powerful can’t be held accountable regardless of their actions? Senators sleeping with their staff members, visit prostitutes while running on ‘family values’? It is time to protest. It is time to take back our country’s governent from the hands of those imposters who say they represent us.

Posted by: Robert Dent | October 27, 2011, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

they’re hippies. i say shoot them all and solve the problem once and for all. theyre just a horrible nuisance and they should be dealt with swiftly and in such a way that the whole movement falls apart.

Posted by: George | October 27, 2011, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

I just listened to a clip of Diane Sawyer’s coverage of the Oakland demonstration for “Occupy Wall Street”. Diane begins with “… showdown with protestors and police clashing in Oakland, California… both sides bracing for another round tonight. How about some more honest coverage with less “spin” such as:

In Oakland, California, police assault demonstrators participating in “Occupy Wall Street” firing tear gas canisters and physical assaulting demonstrators, including critically wounding one demonstrator, Scott Olsen, an Iraq War veteran representing Veteran’s for Peace, by shooting him at point blank range in the face.

Diane Sawyer’s coverage seems to lean towards supporting a police state. This is a democracy. The concerns being expressed by demonstrators are corrupt ties, bailouts, and a lack of regulations created between large corporations, the rich and our government which has created a loss of jobs and economic hardship for most Americans. Now we also have these entities challenging freedom of speech. And where is Diane Sawyer on these issues?

Posted by: Thomas French | October 27, 2011, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Protests costing cities millions? What about the billions spent bailing out greedy corporations who squandered their money on extravagances and speculation.

Small businesses have nothing to fear from protesters doing what is right; protesting against the corporate welfare state that the US has become. Small businesses need to see that supporting the protesters will help them in the long term; reduce the corporate welfare you can reduce the taxes that need to be paid by small businesses.

Posted by: James | October 27, 2011, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

For heaven’s sake, we can’t have these protesters costing taxpayer money. Don’t they understand that taxpayer money is going to be needed for future bank bailouts and tax relief for the top one percent? Selfish jerks.

Posted by: Mickey | October 27, 2011, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

@ Steve: If you want to take back your country, get out there and VOTE!! Take part in the process!

The vast majority of people under 40 don’t bother to vote. And if you don’t vote, you have no right to complain since you’re doing nothing worthwhile to improve the situation. Squatting in a park does nothing but anger your fellow citizens.

And whining that others has too much money when you’re not working and not contributing to society just makes you look bad. If you want to take money away from the rich, figure out something they need, start a business that fills that need, and sell your product or service. THAT IS HOW ITS DONE IN AMERICA! Be an entrepreneur, inventor, developer, or scientist and fill a need. Don’t sit around and be needy, demanding that others give you their money.

Posted by: Jon | October 27, 2011, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

The Mayor of Oakland told a local news reporter that Scott Olsen who suffered a fractured skull, was hit with a 2 x 4 ! The police do not carry lumber or 2 X 4′s around! So one of his fellow protesters clocked Scott Olsen in the head! And the police got the blame!

Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 27, 2011, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

I understand the OWS initial intent and agree with it; however, it has blossomed into so many different, individual protests that there is no organization anymore. Our city “camp” has all the homeless and wandering mental patients along with a bunch of kids not even out of college just there to protest whatever. That is not what this was supposed to be about! They have overflowed the port-a-potties and there is raw crap running into the streets and the rest of us have to live with that along with damages done to parks that I for one am not willing to pay for with my tax dollars. I am currently unemployed and am definitely NOT the 1% but this has gone beyond madness now. Go home, get a job if you don’t have one. You can continue the protest without the need to “camp out”!

Posted by: iam53percent | October 27, 2011, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

I’m thining of building bunker at home in case these loonies decide that they should occupy my home.

Posted by: THOMAS | October 27, 2011, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

The best thing the left has going for it is the hatred the right feeds on. Read these blog posts and all the church going right wing nuts screaming their hate. They have no idea what a democracy is because they don’t live in one, they live in churches tht preach hate and they go online and spew it.

Posted by: Jey | October 27, 2011, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

What might have started out as peaceful protests are now running street battles with police! Anarchists, street thugs, left wing radicals and hippies have taken over the OWS moment! When these people act-out like they did in Oakland, smashing the windows and doors of shops and stores, throwing rocks and bottles, paint bombs and other items at police, they will get arrested!

Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 27, 2011, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Occupy Wall Street folks delude themselves that they represent “the 99%.” I belong to the 53% that pays the taxes they are willing to squander by squatting on public and private land.

Posted by: Damie | October 27, 2011, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

I’m thining of building bunker at home in case these loonies decide that they should occupy my home.

POSTED BY: THOMAS | OCTOBER 27, 2011, 7:53 PM………………A large caliber semi auto firearm would be cheaper and provide better results.

Posted by: BMOC | October 27, 2011, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

“Read these blog posts and all the church going right wing nuts screaming their hate. They have no idea what a democracy is”
Posted by: JEY

Wrong Jey! Democracy is not mob of law breaking street thugs! Democracy is the lawful and orderly act of voting on electron day! Mob rule is anarchy! The police did their job by clearing the streets to keep the law-abiding public safe!

Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 27, 2011, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

This Occupy movement is being BACKED BY “ACORN”! This is downright evil.

Posted by: Dave | October 27, 2011, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Its a shame that Scott Olsen was badly injured but its wrong to imply that the police did it! In fact the Mayor of Oakland has said that Olsen had been hit with a 2 X 4 not a item carried by police! The ABC News report never mentioned that the police may not have been at fault. Olsen may have been injured by one of his fellow protesters who was throwing the 2 X 4 at police but missed! The police did issue many warnings before they cleared the streets, Scott Olsen along with the rest of the protesters could have heeded those warning at anytime but chose not to!

Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 27, 2011, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Fox News says Acorn is involved–will ABC have an article or investigative report on that? Waiting zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

Posted by: jonnie | October 27, 2011, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Time to identify all of these morons and cut them off all the entitlements they are collecting including social security and unemployment payments. Then have them pay for all the damages and make them clean up all their disease infested trash.

Posted by: J Herrera | October 27, 2011, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

I respect those that report the news except when they allow these corporations to report only what is in their best interest.

Funny I don’t have cable so the only way I can follow what is happening on the protest in this country is by the little that has been reported on local news or shows like nightline, ABC news, NBC news and MSNBC. What are they afraid of? Are they afraid that the rest of the world might side with the 99% and this could hurt their profits if everyone joins the fight and they are no longer watching the news but now have become apart of the news.

It does not surprise me that their are police officers out there that are using excessive force against this defenseless protesters what is really sad is that these protesters are speaking for them also and watching a police officer with a baton beating a protester over words is really everything that is wrong with our society. What are they afraid of?

For those that have not used excessive force on these protesters I commend you because somehow watching several big police officers abusing a protester with a baton just doesn’t say much and is a disgrace to those in law enforcement who are truly doing their jobs.

Why aren’t the reporters reporting on the backgrounds of congress and who they truly represent. Why aren’t we doing more reporting on who in congress is benefiting while the rest of suffer and have everything taken away while they are living their exclusive life styles. Let’s shed some light on what is really going on behind closed doors.

I want to see more reporting on these people who have lost or about to lose everything and how they got there.

We all know what the protest are about and it really irritates me that the media keeps reporting that the 99% do have a clear message and that they need to be more specific about their grievances. Who are those that keep stating this really fooling! We all know what their message is and playing games will only create more frustration.

Posted by: Msjma | October 27, 2011, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

I respect those that report the news except when they allow these corporations to report only what is in their best interest.

Funny I don’t have cable so the only way I can follow what is happening on the protest in this country is by the little that has been reported on local news or shows like nightline, ABC news, NBC news and MSNBC. What are they afraid of? Are they afraid that the rest of the world might side with the 99% and this could hurt their profits if everyone joins the fight and they are no longer watching the news but now have become apart of the news.

It does not surprise me that their are police officers out there that are using excessive force against this defenseless protesters what is really sad is that these protesters are speaking for them also and watching a police officer with a baton beating a protester over words is really everything that is wrong with our society. What are they afraid of?

For those that have not used excessive force on these protesters I commend you because somehow watching several big police officers abusing a protester with a baton just doesn’t say much and is a disgrace to those in law enforcement who are truly doing their jobs.

Why aren’t the reporters reporting on the backgrounds of congress and who they truly represent. Why aren’t we doing more reporting on who in congress is benefiting while the rest of suffer and have everything taken away while they are living their exclusive life styles. Let’s shed some light on what is really going on behind closed doors.

I want to see more reporting on these people who have lost or about to lose everything and how they got there.

We all know what the protest is about and it really irritates me that the media keeps reporting that the 99% do not have a clear message and that they need to be more specific about their grievances.

Those that keep keep stating this, who do you really think you are fooling! We all know what their message is and playing games will only create more frustration.

This just reminds me of how corporate, congress and the justice system likes to passify the people because as long as they do this they think they can hold the people off just long enough to screw these individuals over. The fact is corporate America, congress, those with power this isn’t going to last much longer once you remove the safety net of the people you will find that the laws that you have enacted to make people think you are helping them are going to come back an haunt you.

Posted by: Msjma | October 27, 2011, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Acorn is backing this up. Why isn’t this network reporting that? Biased are we?? These stupid people don’t even realized they’re being used as pawns by ACORN. Wake the h up already.

Posted by: anna | October 27, 2011, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

While many people did not agree with the big bank bailouts, most Americans DO NOT APPROVE of the OWS protests that have de-evolved into a mob of street thugs looking for a fight! The tent cities are not welcome and are illegal because of heath and safety code violations! Yes its their right to hold peaceful protests but local laws and heath and safety codes must be obeyed! The protesters have failed to do so and no longer enjoy the support they once did! They should GO HOME, take a bath and get a job! They won’t find one in their tent city!

Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 27, 2011, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Now that makes sense. Nobody, and I mean nobody, fires canisters at point blank range. We stay back, the range of those is such that we don’t compromise the safety of the shooter nor the weapon.

This protester was hit at point blank range, and now it is being reported that it was a 2×4 that someone (with obviously excellent aim) tried to throw at police, but hit this guy in the head, at point blank range.

Why not? They were already an out of control mob throwing anything they had at police trying to start something. Do I put it passed them to throw construction lumber at law enforcement? Nope, not one bit. I’m actually surprised that these protesters didn’t throw fire bombs. Oh give that time, I’m sure.

Posted by: Mike | October 27, 2011, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

The “cities” do not get any sympathy from me. I live in Northern California, and it is unconscionable that the Oakland police injured an Iraq war veteran. Oakland gave a ‘calling all cars’ message to surrounding cities to roust out the protestors, and this is unbelievable in this day and age. This country needs these protestors to shake things up; that CEOs of major companies are making 300 times the average salary of the companies they manage is sinful. I think its time our government listens to the people instead of their rich oil barron cronies. Pay attention to what happened in Egypt and Syria, or it could very well happen here.

Posted by: rohnertpark1 | October 27, 2011, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Republicans cost us more. I see the Foxbots are not disappointing us this evening.

Posted by: Secondlook | October 27, 2011, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

The brain dead koch brother lovers are out in force. Bow down to your masters. Pickin up boss!

Posted by: Mack | October 27, 2011, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

jRepublicans fought tooth and nail to give 2 BILLION in handouts, spending, to oil companies. Why? Those oil companies already made 200 BILLION in profit. The republicans and tea Party cost us OVER 2 billion. Wallstreet was bailed out 700 billion and of that, especially Bush’s part of the bail out, there is ZERO accountability adn much of it was given in the form of bonuses to CEOs who handed themsleves hundreds of MILLIONS!!!! you take ALL these protests and add them up and they dont even equal one million. NOT EVEN ONE ,while what the republicans have done amount of HUNDREDS Of MIllion and billions. Enough is enough. The tax cuts for the rich account for over 3 TRILLION of our debt and those people shipped jobs OUT and again, Tea Party fought tooth and nai lt oCONTINUE that TRILLION in spending. You want the protests to stop???? TAX THE RICH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! get it? TAX THE RICH! 32% income tax BEFORE deduction is RIDICULOUS!!! In Eisenhower’s era they were taxed 80% and in Kennedy’s era they were taxed 60% and now you will not find a single millionaire billionaire who is taxed more than 30%. IT”S RIDICULOUS!!! TAX THE RICH!!!!!!! HELP PAY DOWN THIS DEFICIT BY TAXING THE RICH THEY CAUSED THE STUPID RECESSION TAX THEM TO PAY FOR THE BAILOUTS!!! IT”S THAT SIMPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Johnny boy | October 27, 2011, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Why do they need such a large police presence in the first place? =—— I agree. They aren’t committing any crimes. If there’s an issue, then send out police. Until then, stop making excuses. Doesn’t seem to be any need for police.

Posted by: Johnny boy | October 27, 2011, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

If it was the 1700′s the Koch lovers would be considered loyalists and if was the 1800′s they would be confederates. Too dumb to realize it though. Always fighting for the wrong side and the wrong reasons…hate, fear, racism, etc

Posted by: Mack | October 27, 2011, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

We had our carbon monoxide detector go off and in response to askign for ONE fire car, just a car, come with a detector (family members already out o the house) to confirm carbon monoxide (which we suspected was really only a low battery and told them so) they sent TWO trucks, including the ladder truck, one car, one paramedic . The whole force. really?????? for a carbon monoxide check. Ridiculous. So I tell my neighbors the next day I only asked for one car, and he told me,of the town finance committe, the budget for the fire station is established by how many times the trucks go out!!!!!So, for any little call, they send them out, to justify their budget!!!!!!!!! moochers. Yes, it’s great their fire fighters and all that, but….they’re milking it a bit, eh? So tell me, why are all these police out for a peaceful protest?????? excuse to ramp up the overime pay much??????? please. Dont do us any grand favors. DONT go to the protests, ok? Unless there’s a problem. Go home and spare us your milking the system,.

Posted by: here we go again | October 27, 2011, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Doesn’t seem to be any need for police—what???? and miss out on all the overtime pay? Come on! It’s a great deal! walk around a peaceful protest all night. Pretty easy beat AND you get paid time and half for it! And then just for fun, you get to shoot innocent people not doing anything. Sounds like a ego maniacs power hungry idiot’s dream. Send the POLICE home. save some dough. Tell them they’ll be called if there’s a problem. They’re just milking their own paychecks.

Posted by: here we go again | October 27, 2011, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

most Americans DO NOT APPROVE of the OWS protests ===no actually. they do. Actually most Americans DO feel some solidarity to what these folks are angry about. You need to listen to real news sources, pal. hint…..fox is NOT a news source. So you know….

Posted by: another day in the sun | October 27, 2011, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

All protests have always and always will cost cities money. It’s not just this protest. Although, this protest is very successful so it will cost our cities more money, but that’s why we pay taxes. So that we can afford our protests. The good that will come from the protests outways the current cost.

Posted by: JackWagon | October 27, 2011, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Reminds me of the antiwar protestors of the 60s…who were …RIGHT, weren’t they?????? the police HATED THEM. And…the protesters were RIGHT! So are these. 3 TRILLION of our debt is the bush tax cuts, but even before that, the tax rate for the rich was 35%. with bush tax cuts it went to 32%. During Kennedy’d time, it’s true, they paid 60% tax and never complained and we had enough money to put a man on the moon. now they make a million times MORE than they did back then, and they pay half as much taxes and we had to shut down NASA. it is what it is. They caused this mess. They did. They caused the recression. They laid off all the factory jobs, they kept increasing their personal profits, they created derivatives and short selling and crap securities they lied about as they sold them, they created this recession. have them pay for the bail outs. Tax them. THe war protesters went home whe nthe war was over…and they were RIGHT!!!!! Face it. These kids are right. period. YOu just can’t passed the simple fact that these kids are right. and tell the police to go home. It’s true. They aren’t needed. They are milking their overtime it sounds.

Posted by: Granny knows best | October 27, 2011, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

During Eisenhower’s time the rich were taxed 80%, just to get us out of our hardtimes and help pay for the war. The rich of that era never complained and they never made as much as these of today. The rich of today are horrid people. UnAmerican. You can’t deny that. We are in a recession. In past recessions, the rich helped. The poor send their children to our wars. No rich boy is dying in Iraq. The rich have always paid for the wars, helped out and paid more during hardtimes of recession and depresison. WEll, except for this generation. In this generation, they cause recessions and then expect the middle class to pay for it while they ship their jobs out to china so they can make more profit. The rich of this generation are not true Americans. They are horrid people. The likes of which this country has never seen. Shame on them. And the right wing are stooges for protecting them. We all should support these kids. They’re right. it’s that simple.

Posted by: Granny klnows best | October 27, 2011, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Are you people serious? Government agents shoot an Iraq war veteran in the head with a tear gas canister and crack his skull during a peaceful protest and all you careabout is how much the tear gas canister cost? What about liberty? What about freedom? What about police brutality? What about stifling of dissent? What about the First amendment for crying out loud? If the tear gas bill is too expensive, here’s a thought: Don’t shoot it a peaceful citizens’ heads! I can’t believe ABC is being this retarded.

Posted by: Chris | October 28, 2011, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Keep writing irrelevant stories like this that miss the point entirely and you’ll soon be out of business. It can’t happen soon enough in my opinion. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

Posted by: James | October 28, 2011, 12:24 am 12:24 am

There’s wishful thinking and then there’s reality. The reality is, none of this stops until the rich pay more in taxes. Every generation of rich has paid at least TWICE as much tax as this one. The reaily is, you shoot at these kids, you try to crush them, it wont work. Ask Marie Anoitnette. when there is injustice, it bubbles up to the surface. to the tune of 700 billion in bailouts and million dollar bonuses after tanking the economy and the Tea Party protect them. What is left? what other recourse is there? The Supreme court just said corporatiosn are the same as individuals. POliticans are bought and paid for. What other recourse? the Vietnam war the government was tone deaf to the people. So has this one, the Tea Parrty and republicans even worse than the democrats. This wont end. That is just reality. It will grow and get worse and worse until you tax the rich. So just do it. This is NOT going to end until justice is done. Why did the rich of my youth pay 60% tax rate and not complain and this generation pay half as much????? with much much much more profit? why? No excuse. Pay your share. Move to Engliand and you’ll pay 80%. It is what it is. You got away with being a robber barron this long, now it’s time to pay the piper. Raise their taxes. Make them pay for the bail outs. That is just reality. it will only get ugly and drawn out but in the end, just like during VIetnam, it WILL NOT END until you undo the injustice. 3 trillion of our debt is from tax cuts to the rich who actually laid off en masse during that time. the injustice has bubbled to the surface. This will not be cured until it is. Tax them. make them pay for the mess they created. It iwll happen. Just a matter of how much violence, how much mess, how much more cost before it happens but it will. YOu will tax them more. You will see. So why not just do it now. Why drag this out. Justice will be done.

Posted by: Granny knows Best | October 28, 2011, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Only 37% of Americans now approve of the OWS protesters! – The movement is quickly losing public support because of the law breaking street thugs that are now taking over the movement! – The police need to clear these pot smoking hippies off the streets! The NORMAL hard working people of Oakland who must endure the bad smell of garbage urine and feces from this fleabagger tent city are demanding the city enforce the no camping law! The whole thing stinks and sadly will not end before many more people are badly hurt! A number of store and shop owners suffered broken windows and theft from these so called peaceful protesters! Who is going to pay for that damage!

Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 28, 2011, 1:32 am 1:32 am

And they are environmentalists?

Posted by: mbf | October 28, 2011, 1:47 am 1:47 am

To say this article is poorly researched, written, and framed is an understatement. The picture and its accompanying byline do not describe the situation. Scott Olsen was not simply injured by a projectile; he was injured by a police projectile, without any provocation. This clash was televised, and the overwhelming consensus is that most of the time the police violence is unprovoked.

If the protesters are costing cities millions, then so be it; free speech rights were designed to count despite the form or function of the speech. No one looks back on sit-ins or the million man march during the civil rights era and laments the cost of the movement. If there is a debate on what the cost is then it should be couched in terms of cost to society if free speech rights are violated in favor of public order. Even in this case, public order hasn’t been at issue – more at issue is overzealous police. Police forces and wits are running thin, but as is the case with any movement – even those which we might hate – it’s better to have a debate in the public commons rather than needless restrictions of the rights our founding fathers had enshrined for us.

Posted by: Stephen | October 28, 2011, 1:48 am 1:48 am

Here’s food for thought OWS “projectors”– quit projecting your hate upon others who have what you don’t have. Respect the law and you will be respected by it. Quit blaming everyone else for your problems and become responsible for your own actions. You want to make a democracy-styled difference? Go and vote. Pack up your sh*t, go home, and write your congressman. Your movement has lost its force and message due to lawlessness. So go scurry back to the woodwork you came from, or else get smashed like cockroaches by those who have respect for their hard-earned personal property. Grow up, get off the government tit, start a business, and feel what real freedom really feels like.

Posted by: blu | October 28, 2011, 1:54 am 1:54 am

Sorry Stephen, but your way out in ‘Left Field’. Free Speech has it limits! It does not allow the suppression of the rights of others, it does not allow the breaking of health and safety laws! It does not allow anyone to forcibly ‘Occupy’ anything! As for Scott Olsen, he may have been hit by a 2X4 thrown at the police by a fellow protester, according to the Mayor! Just remember, public safety overrules free speech rights, the courts have ruled on this subject many times!

Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 28, 2011, 2:20 am 2:20 am

The amounts of money that are mentioned as the costs of the protests are so small compared to the amounts of money stolen or more accurately mined out of our pockets by our current political reality that servers those that pay to get politicians elected and pretends to serve us. I feel sorry for those who’s comments belittle the Americans that have the courage to stand up for what is right. I cannot believe that you would say such things if you were able to clearly see the country that we are now living in. These occupiers will help all but those few that are hurting us most.

Posted by: Tim Thomas | October 28, 2011, 2:29 am 2:29 am

And I’d also like to add that I have the freedom to protect my property from any one of these anarchists. I worked for everything I own, and if you don’t have as much as me, well then too bad. Everybody born in this country was born with the same opportunities as everyone else. If you lack success, then maybe you should take a look in the mirror. Quit blaming an entity for all the problems in this country. It’s more than a omnipresent group of Wall Street executives… the real issue is that nobody wants to be held accountable for their own actions. Everyone thinks that money should come easy, and that it solves all problems. Real fortune lies in the way we treat our neighbors. Stealing from others by way of redistributing wealth is not the way to solve the issue. The only way to solve the issue is to restrict the government’s control over our money. Because if the government takes control over what we own, who’s to say what else theyIf have the ability to control? The American dream is to shape our own Destiny, not to allow the government to decide our fates. We should be occupying the gathering places of our do-nothing government… after all, the government is controlled by WE THE PEOPLE. Do not blame a rich guy in a suit or a police officer trying to support his family. Blame our worthless government.

Posted by: blu | October 28, 2011, 2:35 am 2:35 am

You would choose this headline instead of “Iraqi War Veteran Injured by Police” which is a helluva lot more accurate and much more respectful to the military veterans. It seems you are patriotic only when its a sappy or a “clean” story. But not with this raw truth that is the very definition of news.

Also, this story is slanted to the corporate interests that are the 1% and control what is the news many Americans get; your news. Thank God for Al Gore, Current TV and Keith Oberman for accurate news coverage.

I am now choosing to turn away from each of the Corporate run evening news programs because of the lack of in-depth fair and balanced coverage on this story; yes, I never watch that station anyway since they are not either.

I watched as every gathering of 2 or more Tea Party people sneezing together was covered over the last years. And many interviews were given to their leaders. Why did they get so much continuous coverage and OWS didn’t get any coverage until it started building some momentum? And what news program or “reporter” has interviewed anyone in the OWS movement… only Keith that I know of.

Ever since Diane Sawyer became the anchor I have watched this news channel 95% of the time I am home to see it. I mistakenly thought that since you were innovative and started the ‘Made in America’ coverage that you had America’s future at heart.

THIS is the real story about America’s future and not a single newsman I know of for the major channels is doing any special about this phenomenon… even with the polls for it.

Posted by: NowLiveIt | October 28, 2011, 3:00 am 3:00 am

Yea, it seems that ABC forgot to mention that the projectile that injured this veteran was a tear gas canister FIRED BY A POLICE OFFICER! Nice work on covering this story ABC news. This is a fine example of why our country is going into the ground. The people have no idea what is really going on in the world or even our own country for that matter. The media leaves out crucial pieces of information that REALLY tell the story, and we follow whatever they say like sheep. At least untill now. Everyone that has made comments on this that is calling the protesters SCUM are either part of the 1% of people that have all of the wealth in this country, or are very un educated and disconected from what’s really happening in this country right now. I encourage those of you that are so quick to judge the protesters to really go and find out what they are really fighting for. They are not anarchists, they are patriots. Lets take our country back from the greedy people who are robbing us blind of it. God bless america.

Posted by: josh | October 28, 2011, 4:08 am 4:08 am

YAWN….do we have anything else to report besides these HOOLIGANS….grow up their “protesting” has not achieved anything to date except for them to get canisters thrown at them, busted heads and a bunch of other bruises. Be civilized and maybe they would not get hurt. Or better yet, just go back to your ivy league schools and your home and let people do their work. end of story.

Posted by: dreamonia | October 28, 2011, 4:38 am 4:38 am

Obama has sure stirred up the class warfare. He should be very proud. He’s running around at the taxpayers expense champaigning and fund raising from the very wealthy people that the OWS are complaining about. His wife has spent 10 million on just her vacations since she has been in the white house, where is the outrage!! You all should be marching in Washington and messing up the parks there. Like I said in an earlier post, Soros and Accorn is funding this protest all over the world, they are making you look like a bunch of fools. Free speech is fine, your just doing it in the wrong place.

Posted by: Erma | October 28, 2011, 5:53 am 5:53 am

I once respected ABC News, but not after reading this story. Didn’t anybody check the video footage to see that the injury stemmed from police violence? Police around the country are using soviet-style methods to ‘put-down’ protesters. Where is that story ABC?

Posted by: Joe Brandt | October 28, 2011, 6:52 am 6:52 am

Traditional news media continues to show off its irrelevance. If you want to know what the people of Occupy Wallstreet are thinking then, look online for their voices. Don’t listen to the message that happens to get through the media filter because you don’t have to.

Posted by: Chris | October 28, 2011, 7:26 am 7:26 am

Such lack of moral from who is writing the article … it is appalling how not biting the hand that feeds us turns us on. ABC is not doing journalism, but publicity for banks

Posted by: Steve | October 28, 2011, 7:30 am 7:30 am

That pesky first amendment right to assemble and petition the government. If only the founding fathers had left that part out, but how could they know it would cost us so much money?

Nothing like a little biased reporting, ABC. Shame on you. John Cameron Swayze and Peter Jennings must be spinning in their graves.

Posted by: Mcpeed | October 28, 2011, 8:15 am 8:15 am

Just one hedge fund manager, John Paulson, made $ 5 billion last year by forcing through an unneeded and unwanted Dow-Rohm merger that resulted in 3500 people being fired in order for him to pay for that $ 5000 million personal “profit”. Let’s ask him to pay for the few 100 000 bucks here and there.

Posted by: libertyjustice33 | October 28, 2011, 8:24 am 8:24 am

After reading the other comments here, I must apologize. It seems ABC wrote this article for a specific subset of their readers: Those that do not agree with OWS and kind. Stroking the hand that feeds you must be an important thing to do. Working 50hrs a week and wondering how you’ll pay for your kids education makes you a part of the 99%, by the way.

Posted by: Mike | October 28, 2011, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Every movement needs a martyr and he just happens to be it, until it really escalates and someone crosses police, DOES NOT DO AS THEY ARE ORDERED, and dies. Then they will have another reason to whine.

Posted by: Ben | October 28, 2011, 8:55 am 8:55 am

The caption reads “from a head wound after being struck by a by a projectile”

Which is partially true, but lets make it very clear: Mr. Olsen, an Iraq War Veteran and Peaceful protestor, was struck down by the police for expressing his rights that he risked his life to protect. It’s a sad day that we are gunning down our own veterans in the streets.

Posted by: Christopher | October 28, 2011, 9:10 am 9:10 am

This headline makes me sick. ABC news, shame on you.

Posted by: Stanley | October 28, 2011, 9:54 am 9:54 am

so with all this protesting the cops are finally getting the overtime pay they deserve about time

Posted by: colton hamby | October 28, 2011, 10:43 am 10:43 am

The selfish indulgences of private firms in America has cost cities and the American people TRILLIONS. GET OUT OF IT, ABC.

Posted by: Josh | October 28, 2011, 11:19 am 11:19 am

The amount of police at these events are NOT NECESSARY and only cause anger. These 99% are protesting non violently–tear gas was above and beyond the duty of these officers and as a result people got angry.

How about if the cops go back to their day jobs, taking down criminals while protecting THE PEOPLE AND protecting all of the streets not just those filled with protesters and then massive wastes of funds would be saved!.

Posted by: AN AMERICAN | October 28, 2011, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Ref. Abbie Boudreau does not have a clue! The cost the cities are having is due to their illegal acts against the people exercising their 1st Amendment Rights. The Marine that did 2 tours of combat need not be further victimized by the ABC News Reporter Abbie Bludreau. When did she ever pick up a weapon and stand a post. She should just thank him for his service and shut the F up!

Posted by: Anthony | October 28, 2011, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

This kid deserved what he got,The protest Threw paint at police and damaged private property like car parked in the street broke windows and tried to take over city hall…..That’s a paint soaked hand and rag on that kids head….Give it up people you’re scum….

Posted by: Jay | October 28, 2011, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

1st Amendment Rights DO NOT include throwing rocks, bottles, urine and feces at the police! It also DOES NOT include tent cities, illegal camping, suppressing the rights of others, breaking windows, doors and theft from shops and stores! All of which was done by the protesters in Oakland! No ones happy about the lack of jobs or the bad economy but the vast majority of law-abiding Americans WILL NOT support or tolerate OWS protesters acting like a mob of lawless street thugs! Have your protest, get your message out and then GO HOME! No more tent cities or camping that keeps others from using those public spaces!

Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 28, 2011, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

“This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it.” -Abraham Lincoln

People are paying taxes and seeing their tax dollars used against them as city and police waste money on militia reaction. I’ve not seen public spaces been utilized so effectively in my lifetime.

Posted by: chris | October 28, 2011, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

The trash,costs, OWS baloney , Marxist absurdities, protests are tied with the DNC, Dems, Bama, SEIU, ACORN, and voters will realize that these are the same types who have undermined capitalism, our society’s morals, our American heritage, history and values for nearly 7 decades. As protests go on, using our taxpayers’s monies , my guess is all this will backfire. After all , the Times has an article today, saying donors are fleeing Obama because of his leftist failures that are killing free enterprise, our energy systems, and has not increased private sector jobs. Oh, and there is no comparison between these flacks at OWS and the TEAS,. TEAS cleaned up, paid for their own stuff and did not hurt anyone.

Posted by: Glenn Koons, LB, Ca. | October 28, 2011, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

The author of this article should be ashamed. OWS is necessary. The 1% is too powerful, capitalism has failed. How is this unclear? It’s a pure numbers game; look up the income disparity over the last 20 years. Protesters, stay peaceful! This country needs you.

Posted by: Anders | October 28, 2011, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

The fundamental question this election cycle is: ‘Can we overcome the Obama ‘Jobs- Depression’ so long as Obama sits in the WH?’ Certainly the 26 Million Americans without a viable option for productive employment consider this to be the most critical issue confronting our electorate. Unfortunately, the answer is an emphatic ‘NO’. Quite simply, Obama either doesn’t understand -OR- is unwilling to accept the mechanics of job creation in a free-market economy. Certainly the circulating video of a petulant adolescent, utterly out-of-control, as he kicked open the door as he exited the WH conference room ‘after’ he was told by attending members of the Congress that they would NOT give him the massive tax increases that he insisted on to sustain his crippling spending binge of 25% of our GDP, would validate the latter. The explanation is straight forward: Obama views the Tax Code, Regulatory Reform, and Executive Policy such as Obamacare, Housing, and Student Loan Programs, etc., as instruments of WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION. Obama has been schooled in this Marxist dialectic since birth; and, is NOT capable of accommodating real-life consequences. In a functioning Free-Market System, the Tax Code, Regulatory Reform, and Executive Policy are purposely constructed to FACILITATE economic expansion, and concurrently, JOB CREATION. No CEO, with proliferating onerous regulatory measures, pending increases in tax obligations, and Executive policies that cripple profit potential, are going to RISK significant ‘domestic’ expansion, and concurrent hiring of new employees in face of such a fusillade of restrictive business measures being promulgated by the Obama anti-capitalistic agenda. Thus, even with a modestly expanding economy, job-creation will be severely constrained. Paradoxically, the Occupy-Wall-Street protestors, and the Tea-Party activists have a common enemy – Barack Obama. It’s simply a matter of recognizing the actual culprit in the job-creating malaise infecting our body politic. Greg Neubeck

Posted by: gneubeck | October 28, 2011, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

The protests are PEACEFUL. If the American people aren’t even allowed to voice their opinions publicly, what in the world has happened to the ‘Land of the Free’? “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Direct from the First Amendment.

Posted by: Leah | October 28, 2011, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

“Iraq War veteran Scott Olsen, 24, lays on the ground bleeding from a head wound after being struck by a by a projectile during an Occupy Wall Street protest in Oakland, Calif., Oct. 25, 2011.”… BY THE POLICE WHILE PROTESTING PEACEFULLY!

Posted by: Jake | October 28, 2011, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

In this article, writer Abbie Boudreau failed to accurately state the facts. It is *not* peaceful protests that have cost cities millions.

It is paranoid police over-reaction and violence at peaceful protests that has cost cities milions.

When they stop acting like fascists, stop sending people like Scott Olsen to the hospital, ans start having reasonable dialogue, the costs drop to virtually zero.

Posted by: john | October 28, 2011, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

The problem is city decision-making.
They don’t like the sanitation? Which is the cheaper solution? 50$ per day for a porta-pottie? or $20,000 per day for a massive police presence?

right now i can hear choppers hovering over occupy Oakland from my house. Choppers? to monitor a some people in a small group of tents? really?? how much does that cost per hour?

Posted by: john | October 28, 2011, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Nobody is happy about the lack of jobs or the bad economy but the vast majority of law-abiding Americans WILL NOT support or tolerate OWS protesters acting like a mob of lawless street thugs! Have your protest, get your message out and then GO HOME! No more tent cities or camping that keeps others from enjoying those public spaces and parks! – ONCE AGAIN! HAVE YOUR PROTEST, GET YOUR MESSAGE OUT AND THEN GO HOME! – The longer the protesters stay, the less public support they will have! – Then the REAL 99% the people who live and work in the city, will demand the protesters and their tent city be removed! BTW its become clear the left wing group MOVEON.ORG funded by George Soros is funding these protesters, the city should sue them for the permit fees, clean-up costs, police over time costs and legal fees!

Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 28, 2011, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

I have an easy solution. Why don’t they pass a constitutional amendment prohibiting the wealthy from buying politicians. Just a start I know, but giving our citizens a voice again would go a very long way.

Posted by: Terri | October 30, 2011, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Can we talk about WHY those police are there? Are they there to protect the taxpayers who are assembling to talk about their democracy? I think their swinging clubs and tear gas can answer that question.
They are there to protect the financial interests. Occupy Wall Street can’t even get TO Wall Street due to police and barricades. If someone should pay for the extra expense it should be those whose interests are being protected, and it sure isn’t We The People who are benefiting from the extra police presence. It certainly isn’t The 99%.

Posted by: Matt | October 30, 2011, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

It is a pity it always comes down to money. If breaking the budget of major cities across the country is necessary to have the movements voice heard, then so be it.

Posted by: ArmTheHomeless | October 31, 2011, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

OWS is costing the cities of America $11 million plus so far this money
could have been used to help the people that really need help not to
protect a mob. OWS should be ashamed to be doing this to the people of
America. It’s one thing to protest it’s another thing to leech off the
system and take food and clothing out of the mouth of people that really
need it

Posted by: Josh Brown | November 1, 2011, 9:05 am 9:05 am

So basically, the previous poster feels that the public fund draining protests are justified since someone else did it first. That’s intelligent. You’re hurting your own communities people! Use your heads and protest “peacefully” in a more constructive and cost effective manner.

Posted by: gdns56 | November 5, 2011, 4:29 am 4:29 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.