Airline Makes Stranded Passengers Pay for Fuel

Narinder Nanu/AFP/Getty Images
The Austrian airline that passengers say grounded their flight and forced them to pay for fuel in order to continue their trip from India to England says it will investigate the claims and repay the money.
“I have heard what happened. It shouldn’t have happened, and I will investigate why it happened,” Bhunpinder Kandra, director of passenger services for Comtel Air, told the Press Association. “The people who had to pay the money will receive a refund.”
The 16-year-old airline has also cancelled all of this weekend’s flights in and out of Britain.
The airline is in damage control mode following an incident last weekend in which 180 passengers aboard a Comtel flight from Amritsar, India to Birmingham, England were “held to ransom” for six hours on the tarmac in Vienna, Austria, after the chartered flight stopped there to refuel.
Passengers told the Birmingham Mail they were told to disembark in Austria because the airline ”ran out of cash to fund the last leg of the trip.”
When the passengers, each of whom had paid on average $800 for their ticket, refused to either leave the plane or pay the $31,500 for fuel demanded by the crew, a six-hour standoff ensued.
The passengers grew so angry with Comtel during the standoff that Austrian police had to be called. They were eventually led under security escort to cash machines where they pooled together enough money to get the flight back in the air.
The flight, which should have landed in Birmingham last Saturday, arrived, instead, on Tuesday morning.
The flight was delayed from the start, moved from a Saturday departure to Tuesday, because of a conflict between tour operator Skyjet and Comtel, which had hired the plane and the crew from a Spanish company, Mint Airways.
Konrad Bhupinder, managing director of Comtel Air, earlier told the Press Association that Skyjet, which reserved the flight tickets, is responsible for the problem because the company had not paid Comtel for the flights.
“We only organize flights if the tickets have been paid for,” Bhupinder said.
The confusion and sudden flight cancellations have left as many as 600 people stranded in both India and England. The passengers aboard the “ransom” flight are said, however, to be the only ones left stranded mid-flight.
Comtel Air introduced its lower-cost flights between Birmingham and Amritsar last month. The Birmingham Airport is said to have also started an investigation into Comtel.
Despite the mid-flight turbulence experienced by its customers, Comtel’s spokesman says the airline will continue to operate.
“There is no chance of that,” Kandra said when asked if the company was going bust. “Comtel is a very strong company.”

Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
If this happened in America the passengers would sue them into bankruptcy, this is unfathomable.
Posted by: adam | November 17, 2011, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Airlines have been given too much power. They’re out of control. Holding passengers hostage? This is insane – they should be prosecuted! They should be run out of business! They should lose every license they have! The crew should be in jail! And the police who perpetuated the incident by escorting passengers to cash machines!?!? They’re supposed to be protecting people from criminal acts!!! I’ve done my part – I’ve been boycotting air travel for a few years now. If people don’t start standing up for their rights – this will continue. It’s corporate terrorism!!
Posted by: Taintedbylies | November 17, 2011, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
It’s not the airlines fault in this case. It’s the fault of the tour operator,Skyjet. This sort of thing has happened before with flights chartered by tour operators. Several years ago a tour operator shut down while passengers were on a chartered flight and everyone had to find their own way home. Wjat funny is if you go to the Skyjet website they don’t exist any longer. They’re now Flexjet. Advice: Go on your own, never go with a tour operator. If you absolutely have to go on a tour, never go on a tour where the flight is chartered because you have no control over how the flight is paid for. These people could just as easily have discovered Skyjet didn’t pay the airline at all.
Posted by: glacia | November 17, 2011, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
It probably will happen in American and the CEO would get a bonus. The FAA would start strip searching more passengers as a result…..doesn’t make any sense, but sense doesn’t figure into it anymore.
Posted by: Ken | November 17, 2011, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Bottom line: Never, ever buy a ticket on a Comtel flight.
Posted by: George | November 17, 2011, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
@George – I would say the real bottom line is don’t use Skyjet which is now apparently Flexjet. These passengers were the customers of Skyjet not the airline. Every charter contract has a clause concerning extended fuel charges. Having flown on a few chartered flights with the company I worked for I can tell you that paying additional fuel costs is not unusual. These people got screwed by the tour operator. They paid $175 for a good lesson – you don’t need to go through a tour operator to travel.
Posted by: glacia | November 17, 2011, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
This probably has happened in the USA. This problem is not endemic to India or any region of the world since most airliines fly all over the world or have a division co-op that does
Posted by: blogshag | November 17, 2011, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
That’s OK, because England doesn’t need any more dark, dirty foreigners to pollute it’s streets.
Posted by: Tom Hammer | November 17, 2011, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Blessed are the corporations for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Posted by: AppeaseThis | November 17, 2011, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
I can’t see anyone ever using Comtel again. If they’re not bankrupt now they will be as more and more people learn about this stunt.
Posted by: michael1_4 | November 17, 2011, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
If the airline is such a ‘strong company’ why couldn’t they just get the passengers to their destination then sue the tour operator for the money? Seems pretty cut and dry in that regard. Why would the airline risk losing face with these people. Regardless of who set the flight up the airline still has a reputation to uphold. Seems strange to me that a strong company would pull this crap on potential future customers.
Posted by: jojo pumpkin | November 17, 2011, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
“There is no chance of that,” Kandra said when asked if the company was going bust. “Comtel is a very strong company.”……
Famous last words.
Posted by: KD | November 17, 2011, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
@JoJo – I sort of doubt that the airline is too worried about losing face with these particular passengers. I doubt that any of them are likely to charter a jet in the near future. Whether or not the company is “strong”… who knows. But anyone who regularly charters aircraft is more likely to look at this and laugh… and maybe make a joke about paying for the gas next time you go somewhere.
Posted by: glacia | November 17, 2011, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm