Ex-Neighbor Says Sandusky ‘Should Have Been More Careful With Boundaries’

Jerry and Dottie Sandusky walk to his hearing. (Gene J. Puskar/AP Photo)
There was little indication more than 30 years ago that sexual abuse allegations that would come to haunt former Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky, but a former neighbor who played with the Sandusky children said their home was a magnet for neighborhood kids.
“They were the first to have an Atari [video computer] system,” Jeff Bryers, 42, a radio host in State College, Pa., recalled. “It was one of the houses that kids would naturally gravitate towards.”
Bryers lived on Yardel Road in the late 1970s near the Sanduskys’ old residence in the Lemont neighborhood of State College. He still keeps in contact with several of the Sandusky children, he said. The Sandusky’s raised six children.
He reminisced today about the time spent there; playing basketball games, having football tournaments and occasionally even getting to interact with the famed coach himself.
“He [Sandsuky] would come outside and participate for a little while,” Bryers said. “He was definitely the ‘fun dad’ … was kind of neat to say you were hanging out with a Penn State football coach.”
Sandusky was good-natured, he recalled, but was rarely at home. He says that when it came to running the house, wife Dottie Sandusky was the captain.
“She was a disciplinarian, she was the one who made dinner, kept track of everyone,” Bryers said.
That’s one reason Bryers said he finds the accusations so hard to believe, especially the one made by the accuser known to a grand jury as Victim 9. The alleged victim told the grand jury that he was locked in the basement and raped by Sandusky, while yelling out to Dottie Sandusky, who he said was upstairs. She did nothing, according to his account.
She has denied the allegation. “I have been shocked and dismayed by the allegations made against Jerry, particularly the most recent one that a now young man has said he was kept in our basement during visits and screamed for help as Jerry assaulted him while I was in our home and didn’t respond to his cries for help,” Sandusky said in a statement.
And while Bryers said that it would have been out of Dottie Sandusky’s moral character to stand by while such abhorrent acts were committed in her home, he said that, in recent conversations with some of the Sandusky children, he learned that there were some aspects of Sandusky’s behavior that worried her.
“She did have concerns. I think she was concerned that things could be misconstrued,” Bryers said. “I think she had some conversations with him to make sure that he knew there was a danger in spending one-on-one time with kids … she was not thinking anything along the lines of rape. But there were situations, looking back on it, that he probably should have been more careful with boundaries.”
But concern about boundaries was apparently not an issue for Sandusky. A “big kid,” as described by his lawyer, Sandusky was seen as a gregarious, fun joker by the kids in his neighborhood. There was never any indication that he is the man that a slew of accusers say he is, Bryers said.
And while Bryers would love to revel in the memory of Sandusky as a friendly neighbor, he said that the pragmatism in him will not allow it. “A hug can be misconstrued. But there’s no way you can misconstrue anal rape,” he said of the allegations.
Whatever the outcome, Bryers says he has sympathy for another group of people: the Sandusky children.
“My heart breaks for the kids,” he said, “because I know what genuinely good people they are.”
Email




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Let’s hear Big Jerry’s wife explain why one of his accusers (victims) would make UP a story about Sandusky threatening to send him home early from a bowl game. No one would lie that way. They won’t get money by suing for a threat to send them home. The tabloids wouldn’t even pay that much. Hear-Nothing Dottie will probably get a bigger check for this interview than the guy would get for his (true) story about Jerry and the bowl game. Dottie should tell the truth: the boys always screamed pretty loud the first time with Jerry. An interview with either Barbara Walters or Oprah is a disgusting idea. These are softball pitchers…puff piece “journalists.” Let Jon Stewart interview the Sanduskys. WE need to set better limits with Jerry—by keeping him behind bars the rest of his pedophile life.
Posted by: John | December 27, 2011, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Why is Penn State and its students and alumni in such a rush to get things swept under the rug? So that Penn State can go back to making money off of football? So that the student body can safely cheer “We Are, Penn State”? It seems that Penn State and its apologists are attacking the victims in this sad situation and not questioning themselves and their own motives.
It’s going to be a long time before things get back to normal in Happy Valley, my hope is that the arrogance shown by Penn State and its students and alumni will be taken down a notch. They are not invincible and they are guilty of cowardice of character.
Posted by: stevieod | December 27, 2011, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Who says anyone wants things swept under the rug? The fact is that he was no longer an employee of Penn State. It is not a Penn State scandal. It is the Jerry Sandusky scandal, if it is proven to be true. Penn State, as a community, is not arrogant, but we know who and what we are. We won’t let other people define us with half-truths and rumors. If being self-confident is perceived by some to be arrogance, then that’s their problem.
Posted by: wryview | December 28, 2011, 7:32 am 7:32 am
It is a Penn State scandal becuase it took place there while he was a coach there. While he may not be employed there any longer, if it happened at Penn State, they are indeed part of the scandal.
Posted by: Debo | December 28, 2011, 8:21 am 8:21 am
WRYVIEW; It most definately IS a Penn State scandal. There is no way to separate Sandusky from the school and football team. The reason the molestations continued was due to a lack of action by Joe Pa and his staff.
Posted by: Joseph C. Merrick | December 28, 2011, 9:02 am 9:02 am
So, the red-haired assistant is lying when he said he saw Sandusky raping a boy? And grown men “horse around” with naked boys in the shower? Wow, this neighbor has his or her head in the sand!
Posted by: MZ | December 28, 2011, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Bryers needs to shut up and be thankful that he wasn’t one of Sandusky’s victims.
Posted by: sammy | December 28, 2011, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Is there no proof reader? “The Sandusky’s raised six children.” Apostrophe use is taught in what, the 2nd grade? Shame on ABC…
Posted by: Angela Kellum | December 28, 2011, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Let the bags (JS and Dottie and the attorneys) go to the tabloids if they want to.
If B Walters takes this interview I will absolutely give up and will forever boycott all the work she and ABC does.
Now, next question: what is the status of the investigations that Social Services is doing on the other 2 newer reports (His grandson and another child? When does that finding come out?
New charges or cover up?
Posted by: beewee | December 28, 2011, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Logic and science tell us it is not possible for Sandusky to be innocent at this point. The “innocent until proven guilty” thing is a formality in this highly unusual case. Bayesian probability comes into play with this many accusers and the nature of the accusations and their accusers. A solid knowledge of psychology and statistics will make his guilt overwhelmingly obvious… to those who choose to see it…
Posted by: Anastasia | January 4, 2012, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm