Dec 5, 2011 2:08pm

Michigan Mayor’s Anti-Gay Slur Prompts Protest

Protesters are planning a rally tonight outside the Troy, Mich., city hall to protest anti-gay remarks made by Mayor Janice Daniels.

Daniels, the newly-elected mayor of one of Detroit’s biggest and most cosmopolitan suburbs, is under fire for making vulgar remarks about gays on her Facebook page. A Tea Party supporter elected last month, she posted a status report in June saying: “I think I am going to throw away my I Love New York carrying bag now that queers can get married there.”

The post, which has since been deleted, came a day after New York legislators voted to allow gay marriage in their state. The Daniels comments, just made public last week, have since gone viral on the web and caused a firestorm in Michigan.

Oakland County Commissioner Craig Covey, Michigan’s first openly gay mayor, told ABC News that Daniels should immediately apologize: “I was incredibly disappointed. It goes against what a lot of us have been working on, which is to make southeast Michigan a lot more accepting and embracing of our diversity.”

Covey, a former mayor of nearby Ferndale, fears the Daniels controversy could harm business in Troy, home to upscale shopping malls and several large companies.

Denise Brogan-Kator, executive director of the gay rights organization Equality Michigan, told ABC News: “I was shocked. I was appalled. The choice of language underscores an inherent bigotry that manifests itself in discrimination. ”

Mayor Daniels didn’t respond to requests for comment by ABC News.

A Michigan news site, MLive.com, quoted Daniels saying she “probably shouldn’t have used that language,” but believes “marriage should be between one man and one woman.”

But Equality Michigan’s executive director insists Daniels’ position on gay marriage is not the issue. Said Brogan-Kator: “My objection to it is the way she characterized her speech. She was going to throw something away because ‘queers’ could marry. She chose the word ‘queers’ for a reason, to degrade the gay and transgender population.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

Ms Mayor
I urge you not to apologize for exercising your right of free speech. Those who feel degraded by your comment are degraded by their practices. Nothing less!

Posted by: Marshall | December 5, 2011, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

An individual who holds a public office has the responsibility to serve and support his or her public. That’s the bottom line. Daniels clearly fails in this.
Regardless of Daniels’ personal opinion of same-sex marriage, she should know better than to publically post speech that is so clearly hateful. While she has the right to free speech, she also has the responsibility to exercise good judgement and not to alienate an entire group of people that she was elected to represent.

Posted by: Wolverine | December 5, 2011, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Are you serious? She is an elected official. She shouldn’t just be required to apologize, she should resign! This is outrageous! She is supposed to be serving the people of Troy, and like it or not, there are homosexual citizens in the city. Her comment was not only inappropriate given her position, but it shows that she doesn’t have everyone’s best interest in mind. She deserves to be fired and I hope the citizens of Troy feel the same way. She used her free speech and now they should use theirs, to recall her!

Posted by: Lucas | December 5, 2011, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Her name is Janice Daniels, not Joyce Daniels. Please fix this.

Posted by: Shana | December 5, 2011, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

As a Troy resident, I find the mayor’s comments both appalling and embarrassing. It is so sad that this level of ignorance and discrimination still exists in the 21st century. Just because she has the right to free speech does not mean it is morally okay to publicly engage in hate speech and offend entire communities, especially as an elected official. 

Posted by: Shana | December 5, 2011, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Who ever said this was hate speech? I do not know the mayor’s motives but it sounds more like a casual statement. Homosexuals are allowed to go around declaring their views but straight people aren’t? So, there’s only free politically-correct speech, now? Where’s that in the Constitution?

Posted by: Em In OH | December 5, 2011, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

People are not upset because she expressed her views on gay marriage; they are upset about the manner in which these views were expressed and the language that was chosen to express them. There is nothing “casual” about discrimination.

Posted by: Shana | December 5, 2011, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Shana, that is like saying White people aren’t allowed to say the N word for African-Americans just because it isn’t “politically correct.” Wow. She can’t say the Q word in that context for very obvious reasons, and you know it – unless you aren’t playing dumb and actually are.

Posted by: "Politically correct" | December 5, 2011, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

She’s just trying to stir up controversy so that she gets more exposure. It’s politics, nothing more.

Posted by: JSinNC | December 5, 2011, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

@ Shana– So, now, you can tell people’s motives for doing things? Homosexuals can bash straight people without getting in trouble for it. Why do they get special privileges?

Posted by: Em In OH | December 5, 2011, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Your comment as a whole makes no sense, so I will address your “points” one by one.

1) “that is like saying White people aren’t allowed to say the N word for African-Americans just because it isn’t ‘politically correct’” —- White people can say the N word all they want, because of that whole free speech thing and all, but are you seriously trying to say that there would be nothing wrong with an ELECTED OFFICIAL using the word?

2) ‘She can’t say the Q word in that context for very obvious reasons and you know it” —- Wait a minute, when did I say she couldn’t?

Posted by: Shana | December 5, 2011, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

When did I say that it was okay for straight people to bash gay people? Oh wait, I didn’t.

Posted by: Shana | December 5, 2011, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

@JSINNC – I love how you justify tit for tat for bigotry, but on the other hand, could you show us where the gays are bashing straight people. Stories like Matthew Shephards “gay bashing” is the reality because ignorant hateful bigots like you people think its ok to kill and demoralize others because they are different.

Posted by: TJ | December 5, 2011, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Oops, I wrote that backwards.

Posted by: Shana | December 5, 2011, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

She is a disgrace and should resign in shame. Bigotry like that has no place in high elected office. Just imagine what kinds of policies she is pursuing with that kind of hatred in her heart.

Posted by: JimBob | December 5, 2011, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

This is the Mayor of the 2nd largest city in Michigan. Politicians are held to a different standard – one that does not spew hateful comments about others. What sort of example does this set for the students in the Troy Public Schools. With a comment like this I wonder if the citizens of Troy elected a bully? Maybe they should poll the voters to see if they still want her in office. I doubt this is the sort of act that will bring new business to the city. The signs when you enter the city welcome you to “The City of Tomorrow”. Comments like this set us back decades.

Posted by: GoBlue | December 5, 2011, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

she is entitled to her own opinion, people keep saying she has hatred and all that, from what I see those people are more hate full in their comment than what they accuse her of, let her have her own culture and own opinion, I hope she won’t apologize for any of it because there is NOTHING TO APOLOGIZE FOR.

Posted by: truthspeaker | December 5, 2011, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

She has every right to say it, and we have every right to criticize her for it. Free speech goes both ways.

Posted by: jock59801 | December 5, 2011, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Why do so many people make this about free speech? Yes the Constitution allows her to say what she believes. So what? The Constitution tolerates a lot of things that would never fly in my mother’s house.

Posted by: Brian | December 5, 2011, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

AGAIN – The problem here is NOT how she feels about gay marriage, it’s the language she used to express her belief. While I am a gay man and naturally I disagree with her opinions, I would not feel so offended at this if she hadn’t used the word “queer” as a pejorative and had expressed in a CIVIL way why she is opposed to gay marriage. This is America and we are all entitled to our opinions and to express them. But the Founding Fathers did not intend for free speech to be used to degrade or demoralize others. I think Denise Brogan-Cator hit the nail right on the head with her comment. If I lived in Troy, I would be ashamed to have this woman as my mayor.

Posted by: Chris | December 5, 2011, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

What idiots would elect a tea party supporter, umm HELLO TEA PARTY! one of THE WORST and most abhorrent parties in the USA government….. only in Michigan….

Posted by: Michael | December 5, 2011, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

If the slur she’d used was “tranny,” in any context, less than a fourth of the people protesting now would say anything and it probably wouldn’t even make it on ABC news. And the other half of those now protesting would tell those who DID get offended that they’re just being oversensitive, that they should stop being PC police, that they should let it go.

Just something to think about.

Posted by: Mags | December 5, 2011, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

To those defending this on free speech issues, what if she had used a racial slur or an offensive slur about a religious group – would you feel the same? What if I said, “That’s so typically ignorant Tea Party.” Would you feel like that was unfair? Her words reflect bigotry, plain and simple. She should apologize, at least, and take action to ensure that the lgbt people in her city know she will not denigrate or work to undermine their civil rights. She has disgraced her office. She needs to meet with some representatives of the gay community to hear their side of things.

Posted by: Jimcracky | December 5, 2011, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Some one needs to remind Ms. Daniels that she has gay and lesbian residents in her fine city, people who have already experienced plenty of name-calling by fundamentalists. And exactly how does same sex marriage affect Daniels in any way? Really, it is embarrassing when a grown up uses nasty language about other people.

Posted by: Homer | December 5, 2011, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

She is entitled to her views, and she can share those views; Tell people you are against whatever you want. This is different – this is bullying. Free speech is only protected to the point where you are not causing harm to others (We all know you can’t yell “Fire” in a crowed theater). There are middle school and high school kids that are literally KILLING themselves because of the shame and hurt caused by this type of speech. How can a teacher, school administrator, or even parent for that matter, possibly be expected to stand their ground and teach tolerance if we allow comments such as this from our elected officials?

Posted by: Mike | December 6, 2011, 12:51 am 12:51 am

What one sows, so shall they reap …
hate, discrimination, condemnation, crucifixion all in the name of free speech …
what one sows, so shall they reap ….
holier than thou, speaking for God, judgement …
what one sows, so shall they reap … what one sows, so shall they reap.

If the shoe was on the other foot , would all you anti-gay posters be so righteous. One day you will have a Gay child, grandchild, great grandchild, and hopefully then you will know the meaning of hurt and meanness.

What one sows, so shall they reap!

Posted by: Steve Leong | December 6, 2011, 12:51 am 12:51 am

It was a smartassed remark that should tail her far beyond any apology–(these apologies are so easily and frequently crafted today, and are often so conditional as to be worthless)–but the whole point is not her blockhead views on gay marriage. That is the smarmy misdirection that would distract us from the fact of her ugly name-calling. Would she feel respected if referred to as a cow?

Posted by: tomchicago | December 6, 2011, 1:06 am 1:06 am

She did not use an anti homosexual term, she used a pro-straight term.

Posted by: joe public | December 6, 2011, 4:42 am 4:42 am

I had a choice whether to earn my Ph.D. in Michigan or New York. While the program itself was the main factor in my decision, homophobes like this and legally-sanctioned discrimination enshrined in state law were are also hugely influential in my decision. Michigan will continue to repel ethical top students and professionals by making itself a very unattractive place to live for those who value human rights.

Posted by: Noirdame | December 6, 2011, 9:40 am 9:40 am

In our constitution it states that religion & state are separate. So why is it that the bible is thrown in everytime it is discussed?

Posted by: Tori Bee | December 6, 2011, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Today, Gov. Snyder signed long awaited, anti-bullying legislation here in Michigan. The original bill included an exception for religious and moral beliefs, but after an intense backlash, it was taken out. The bill he signed today takes steps to make sure that the kind of hate language that Ms. Daniels used will NOT be tolerated in our schools. It should NOT be spoken by our elected officials. She should absolutely resign. This is NOT a freedom of speech issue.

Posted by: dbv2011 | December 6, 2011, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Why is such a fuss being made of the use of one word that yes is offensive but I do not hear anyone condiemng the anti-semetic signs and speech at the protests in N.Y, which is pure hate of another group.

Posted by: howard alexander | December 6, 2011, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

As a resident of Oakland County, Michigan, I’m disappointed that we have this person in place as a local leader. Saying something like that… on Facebook no less… is not the mark of a leader. It’s the mark of someone who has not grown up and who is still being a crass bully towards something that she obviously does not want to begin to understand. Unfortunately, her constituents are made of up gay people, too, and she needs to get a grip on that reality, as do many people who have left equally closed-minded comments in their replies to this article. We have people on here talking about “free speech” and “the constitution,” when in reality it has nothing to do with free speech or the constitution; it has to do with people ending the endless attacks on anything and everything that might be slightly different from who they are. Stop.

Posted by: Jason | December 7, 2011, 7:15 am 7:15 am

Every time I have used an anti gay remark I have regretted it and I’m sure she does now too. I would NEVER say anything close to this as a public official.

Posted by: Mervin | December 7, 2011, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

What’s the problem here. Many Americans feel the same way. New York is messed up. Everybody knows it. Even California, as lib as they are, know that gays can’t and shouldn’t get “married”. Don’t worry, Mayor. You have our support!!!! Keep up the fight!

Posted by: Robert | December 8, 2011, 7:17 am 7:17 am

This is the issue; an elected official expressed views that promoted bigotry and hatred (yes, hatred) toward members of her constituency that she has sworn with her hand on a bible to promote and protect. In fact, one could assume that given her anti homosexual agenda she is actively working to undermine and convey second class status upon Troy’s gay community. How can such a person work for her city at the same time she is denegrading her citizens? She is surely free to continue her crusade of hatred and ignorance! Just not as the mayor of Troy, Michigan. Shame.

Posted by: Cpt Awkward | December 8, 2011, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

I am a married man. My wife and I also support, attend, and work with the local lgbt group and all of its events. We live in Northern Michigan, so this really doesn’t have much affect on us up here as we are standing up for our beliefs and facign our own issues. As far as my opinion on what was said by the mayor…It was wrong. Not because of the things that many are saying, but because she holds a public office. She is suppose to set the standards and show a clear difference between what is right and what is wrong. This comment does not offend me in any way shape or form, but she should have known that it was going to offend people. The fact that she actually feels that she is going to throw away her hand bag for just that reason is absurd and childish in so many ways. I do not feel as though she should step down, but an apology and to be asked to go through classes about acceptance and truly caring for people, is a good way to start things off on the right foot. I do not feel as though she is a bad person for that comment, but when it comes down to the position that she holds, it was wrong and needs to be corrected. It does not matter whether or not anyone feels like it was right or wrong. It was something that simply should not have been said. I do hope that she truly realizes her mistake and really wants to learn to accept people of different lifestyles, as no one is better than another.

Posted by: GNeeley | December 13, 2011, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Statements like hers (just like KKK racial talk) – can lead to things like lynching and gay-bashing.

I have been gay-bashed twice, however I am now WELL equipped to K I L L (repeat – K I L L) the next MoFo who tries it (and I MEAN that shyt); I’m sure others are too.

So when people in Michigan start killing each other behind her rhetoric – don’t be surprised folks!

Posted by: Mike Payne | December 14, 2011, 8:58 am 8:58 am

the persecution of the normal is getting pathetic…….GAY MARRIAGE IS INSANE…….the only reason gays want marriage is the have the same rights as truly married couples….

Posted by: ruby | December 15, 2011, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.