Dec 7, 2011 8:06am

Mona Lisa’s Secret: Hidden Animals?

ap mona lisa hidden picture jef 111206 wblog Mona Lisas Secret: Hidden Animals?

Artist Ron Piccirillo claims he found the heads of a lion, an ape and a buffalo hovering in the air in the background of the Mona Lisa, after turning the painting on its side. (Photo Credit: Associated Press)

New York artist Ron Piccirillo is claiming to have unlocked the secrets behind one of the most mysterious faces in history — Mona Lisa.

Piccirillo argues that several animals can be seen hidden in the painting when it is set horizontally. The Rochester graphic designer and painter said a lion, ape and buffalo can be seen around Mona Lisa’s head and a snake or crocodile is near her right shoulder.

The animals led Piccirillo to Leonardo da Vinci’s journals and a few passages that mention the animals he sees.

“When I came across these answers, which I call the ‘accidental discovery,’ I wasn’t seeking the information,” Piccirillo told ABCNews.com. “I was just able to pull out a lot of puzzle pieces together that led me to the answers. It all came from Leonardo’s writings.”

One of the passages that references “her heart gnawed by a swelling serpent” also says, “Give her a leopard’s skin, because this creature kills the lion out of envy and by deceit.” Though the passage does not mention the “Mona Lisa” specifically, Piccirillo said he believes the references to the serpent and the lion lead back to the painting and back to the woman with the infamous smile.

Piccirillo said he believes that Mona Lisa was not an actual person, but, rather, symbolic of the human trait of envy. He also believes that his discovery will be important to an art community that has been puzzled by the painting for centuries.

“I was definitely aware of how big the impact would be in the art world,” he said. “I knew it was going to be the biggest thing in 500 years.”

Members of the art community do not necessarily agree with Piccirillo’s sense of the importance of his discovery.

“I don’t believe there’s any reason to dwell on this particular theory,” Brown University art history professor Evelyn Lincoln told ABCNews.com. “It doesn’t help me understand the Mona Lisa to think of her as hiding iconographic symbols that are rather disconnected of envy.”

Lincoln called the theory “problematic” and said that the interpretation may have more to do with the viewer than the painting itself. She pointed out that the image people are looking at is not the original painting and that even the original has been worn down by time, with crack and oil.

Lincoln also noted that da Vinci’s journals themselves are fragmentary and were put back together after his death.

“The idea that we should be turning the painting upside down and around for an odd iconographic rendition of envy seems to be a personal obsession that this particular graphic artist seems to find in every painting he looks at,” Lincoln said. “It’s not my Mona Lisa.”

Still, Piccirillo said he is confident in his assessment and his theory.

“I’ve been an artist all my life and always been aware of the mysteries of the Mona Lisa, but I was never that interested in it. I was more interested in the beauty of the art itself,” he said. “But once you know what to look for, it’s there.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

Ya know… for the life of me, I just don’t “get” all the brouhaha over and about this painting! Art historians please weigh in here!!! I have been blessed/fortunate enough to have visited the Louvre many times and I have to admit the biggest (and probably only) disappointment that I have ever experienced there was seeing this painting. I remember when I first saw it and how shocked I was that it was just a regular sized portrait. I have seen this thing just hanging on the walls and also with state of the art security along with armed guards ready to shoot. I just don’t get it!!! Especially when you compare it it to all the other magnificent works throughout the palace. I suppose I can say that I have seen the “Mona Lisa” in person and up close. Okay… I have… WHOOPIE, I guess…

Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 7, 2011, 8:54 am 8:54 am

THAT’S IT!!! I’ve solved the riddle. The Mona Lisa is a hidden objects painting for children!

Posted by: Arf40 | December 7, 2011, 8:55 am 8:55 am

I too have seen the painting hanging in the Louvre and it’s small yes but it’s a beautiful piece of art and I am very lucky to have seen it in person. Art is more than just beach scenes and Thomas Kinkade prints.

Posted by: Melissa | December 7, 2011, 9:57 am 9:57 am

If you look at the picture WITHOUT the highlights, you can’t see anything! So much excitement over a painting can cause anyone to see anything.

Posted by: Caitlyn | December 7, 2011, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Pareidolia

Posted by: Minorkey1 | December 7, 2011, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Pareidolia??? LOL!!! It must be!!! Again, I just don’t “get” the commotion over this stamp of a picture. Its not as if its DaVinci’s best work–from my knowledge anyway. Yet, it is indeed one of the most famous paintings in the world!

Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 7, 2011, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Lions? And tigers? And bears???Oh my!!!

Posted by: Doron Davidson | December 7, 2011, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

MyTakeOnThis61–LOL You are right about disappointment! Though the Mona Lisa is a beautiful painting, it is almost impossible to get close enough to view it. Placed behind a huge thick glass wall, with three guards on each side, two barriers in front not allowing people to get within about 15 or so feet of the painting and the crowds, I could barely make it out. It is pretty much a rip-off since many tourists go to the Louvre hoping to get more than just a faraway glimpse of the Mona Lisa. For my part, I found the D’Orsay Museum to be much more interesting than the Louvre anyway since it contains a lot of French Impressionist and Post-impressionist painters.

Posted by: EJW | December 7, 2011, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

It is famous because it is first. This was the first realistic portrait of a person. The perspective, the shading and the illusion of actual life had never before been rendered by any artist.

Posted by: David Bailey | December 7, 2011, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

The original has been work down by time, with CRACK and oil? The only crack here was smoked by Mr. Piccirillo immediately prior to his coming up with this goofball theory. Like many others, I don’t see why I’m supposed to believe that this painting holds all the mysteries of the universe anyway. It’s a well-executed picture of a woman with a slight smile. Period. Why does it have to be anything else?

Posted by: Dave | December 7, 2011, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

I think i have found a horse in the picture. just need someone to confirm it.

Posted by: Ashley | December 7, 2011, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Sometimes a painting is just a #### painting. Why do we humans seem to think there were all these hidden secrets in all this stuff from the past.

Posted by: anotherday | December 7, 2011, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Well, this is a good hint for Dan Bown to write a new book!!!

Posted by: da | December 7, 2011, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Theres also a cats face in the nose of the lion face

Posted by: Lindsey | December 8, 2011, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

I’m amazed that the ABC would cover claptrap like this. They continually sink further into the mire.

Posted by: gavin | December 8, 2011, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Buffalo? Did they even know what a buffalo was during this time period. I know that columbus had all reday discovered America, but did leo know about them?

Posted by: Gil | December 11, 2011, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

No lie, their a gold fish back their too

Posted by: Chrizzy | December 11, 2011, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

mysterious paining? its a painting of a woman. nothing more … nothing less. and even if there were animals in the background, WHO CARES! its still a painting of a woman. jeez.

Posted by: puffidredz | December 12, 2011, 9:26 am 9:26 am

just looked at another portrait of it and in the NON-yahoo photos, it DOESNT look like animals at all when turned sideways. the lion jus looks like clouds, the ape or whatever its suppose to be just looks like mountains and whatever is suppose to be on her left shoulder, are just mountains too. people are really reaching here and this photo is clearly ALTERED to look like what it thinks u want to see. its kinda like when u look up at the sky on a clear day and theres a few puffs of clouds going by. they ALWAYS look like lions, peoples faces, animals, cars and even jesus christ himself. what a rubbish article.

Posted by: puffidredz | December 12, 2011, 9:32 am 9:32 am

So Da Vinci must have had ESP…or secretly travelled into Africa or Asia. Mona Lisa was painted in 1503-04…but the first reports of apes and their bodies filtered into Europe over 150 years later (orangutans @ 1654). And the first living ape, an orangutan, was brought to Europe only in 1776. So apparently Da Vinci new precisely what apes looked like 150 years before any other Europeans. He was amazing, but I think this is taking it too far!

Posted by: cinnamonape | December 12, 2011, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Ron here. I wanted to chime in. Check out TheHiddenHorseHead.com for more details on my discoveries.

Posted by: ron | December 18, 2011, 2:06 am 2:06 am

Thank you to Ron Piccirillo, for finding the symbolic animal shapes in the painting!

Posted by: Cherie Miller | December 19, 2011, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Well obviously DaVinci was visited by ancient aliens and used their info to put animals in his painting that has never been seen by Europeans in that time.

Posted by: Blazekin36 | February 1, 2012, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.