Jan 27, 2012 5:22pm

Las Vegas Mayor Living On Food Stamps

gty carolyn goodman dm 120127 wblog Las Vegas Mayor Living On Food Stamps

                                                                                  (Image Credit: Ethan Miller/Getty)

 

Carolyn Goodman may be the only mayor in the United States on food stamps, but it’s only temporary. Goodman is taking part in a local food bank’s challenge to live on $4.06 per day– the amount a single person who qualifies for food stamps receives.

“I didn’t get to put any fruit on my meal plan this week. And, there’s not much variety in my vegetables. It’s a good thing that I love tomato soup!” Goodman blogged on the SNAP Experience Blog.

The week long challenge, which ends today, was organized by Three Square Food Bank in Las Vegas.

John Livingston, spokesman for Three Squares, said at 6-foot-6 and 250 pounds, he has been struggling to live on $4.03 per day.

“The biggest thing I’ve noticed is my cognitive skills have diminished,” Livingston said. “It takes me a longer time to process things.”

Mayor Goodman told ABC affiliate KTNV it was difficult to scale back her usual eating habits to fit a tight budget.

“My life is so busy and I sort of respond to the needs of my body when it says, ‘Help! I’m starving!’ and I think, ‘oh, what shall I have today? Shall I have a bag of potato? Oh no.. .you’re on the program,’” Goodman said.

Livingston said the food bank wanted to highlight the struggle of everyday Americans who receive assistance from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, called SNAP, for short.

“The main thing we really want is to let people understand this so we protect the benefits and they don’t get cut or lessened,” he said.

 

User Comments

“The biggest thing I’ve noticed is my cognitive skills have diminished,” Livingston said. “It takes me a longer time to process things.”…………………………………………So is she saying poor people are stupid?

Posted by: david | January 27, 2012, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

What the heck is a bag of potato?

Posted by: unknown | January 27, 2012, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

The spokesperson for the Las Vegas Food Bank made that statement. Not the mayor.

Posted by: Nicki | January 27, 2012, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

No.. you are I guess. “He” was saying that without a healthy balanced meal, our bodies don’t function physically or mentally, as they would if we had the proper energy. I hope that was supposed to be funny, cuz if not I’m a little worried.

Posted by: kimlv | January 27, 2012, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Glad to see out mayor doing something for us people of Las Vegas

Posted by: Joseph Wells | January 27, 2012, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

And remember that there a PREGNANT AMERICAN WOMEN that are being denied Food Stamps, while there are foreigners that are receiving FULL BENEFITS!!!!
Doesn’t sound right to me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Kathryn | January 27, 2012, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Gal in front of me got 2 Red Bulls and a pack of gum….out came the EBT card. Can she survive on that for a day, or is there a whole lot of fraud and lying going on?

Posted by: jim murphy | January 27, 2012, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

She didn’t sound like she was taking the challenge seriously. She said there was too much meat on her bones to become lightheaded. Everybody needs to eat a certain amount of calories or they will become lightheaded, even fat people.

Posted by: kamjosky | January 27, 2012, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Jim, I really think you need to be minding your own business. What is it to you if she bought Red Bull and a pack of gum and why were you eyeing what came out of her wallet anyway? Stop being so nosy…

Posted by: Hanna | January 27, 2012, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

I spend between 150-200 a week on my family of 5. This includes three teens. We eat very well, including fresh veggies. I buy what is on sale and plan my menu accordingly. I also cook from scratch as much as possible. It can be done.

Posted by: Rose | January 27, 2012, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

La la la la loooo If us bears don’t eat we get dizzy and light headed too.. seriously. I wonder how the senior citizens can make it on 13.00 a month on food stamps or 16.00 a month on foodstamps..They are supposed to get at least 16.00 a month and a lot of them dont even get that. How does the government expect people to live on even 200.00 per month in foodstamps?? Okay 200.00 a month is better than 16.00 a month but..that is the most foodstamps available to women with children.. or to those who dont have an income. ugh..

Posted by: tiabear | January 27, 2012, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Food Stamps were designed to be a supplement to the family food budget. They were NEVER meant to be the entire food budget. Honestly, people, the government cannot pay for everything!

Posted by: Mary | January 27, 2012, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

“They were NEVER meant to be the entire food budget.” What happens to a family that went from a good, well-earned income to a part-time is all the work I can get income? What happens when there is a seasonality to that income with 1-2 month gaps where there is no money coming in and the state says you don’t qualify for unemployment to cover the gap? Food stamps have gotten my family through some devastating changes since the economy tanked and my job went with it 3 years ago, and yes, some months it is the only source of buying food that we had. It’s hard to only use food stamps to supplement the family food budget when there is no budget there to supplement.

Posted by: DWFOhio | January 27, 2012, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

@kamjosky
Of course it’s our business.. She’s using my freakin money to buy redbull and gum when she should be buying groceries for her family.. I wish the government subsidized my energy drinks and snacks..

Posted by: Vic | January 27, 2012, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

@VIC: I agree about restricting certain items. Its ridiculous that some of us have to learn to budget meals for ourselves or families while others get to splurge on junk food like candies, chips, or soda.

Isn’t SNAP supposed to be a “nutrition assistance program”? Then, like WIC, they should only offer healthy options. They gov. needs to step up cuz we are getting taken advantage of.

Posted by: Angela | January 27, 2012, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Vic: I agree, it is not being nosy to notice that some low life is using government money to buy things that are not necessities. The point of this article is how hard it is for people on food stamps to live on that amount and I think most of us agree (tax-paying ones that is) that there is too much fraud and cheating going on by low-life scum who would rather someone else pay for their laziness. And BTW it was Hanna that replied like an idiot not Jim.

Posted by: Seriously | January 27, 2012, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Vic, judge not, lest ye be judged. While I generally tend to agree that food stamp use should be restricted to healthy food options, I also resent the hell out of people who feel they have the right to micro-manage what other people buy/eat just because they are “on welfare”.

When my late husband became disabled several years ago due to a genetic condition diagnosed late in life, we went on food stamps for a while. 99.9% of what I bought was healthy groceries to cook from scratch, and even THEN some gave me the stink-eye because I bought something THEY felt was extravagant (whole grain pasta or bread instead of white, which cost more; fresh fruits and veggies instead of canned or frozen, etc..)

I REALLY got some dirty looks the day I bought a bag of M&Ms, a 2 liter soda, and a quart of ice-cream. For my 6 yr. old daughter’s birthday party (at our home, and for which I made the cake from scratch, and topped it with the M&Ms). They had no way of knowing that my purchases were a rare treat for a little girl whose dad was dying and who really wanted to have a party with her friends and be able to have soda and ice-cream and “the works”.

For all you know, that woman you saw also spent 99.9% of her EBT funds on “groceries for her family/herself”. Maybe she had a job interview and needed the pick-me-up and fresh breath. Or maybe it was just a rare treat (we ALL need them). The thing is, you DON’T know, and maybe shouldn’t be so eager to dictate or condemn (or ask the government to).

And FTR, both my late husband and I worked most of our lives, even owning 2 small businesses, and paid our taxes. For a brief period, we needed to get some BACK in the form of public assistance during a time of crisis. We were spending OUR tax money as much as we were spending YOURS.

Posted by: RAVEN | January 27, 2012, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Guys, if people are able to buy the bad foods and things on food stamps you can blame the lobbyists and congress. They are the ones that pay off congress to allow this because they want their piece of the pie. Let’s not forget that most towns now have food banks to help many of these folks when their stamps run out as well.

Posted by: lexingtonlady | January 27, 2012, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

My family was on food stamps for four years, also welfare, due to a severe mental illness in my husband, who I was caretaking. We would go to Erie, PA to Erie County Farms. Chicken wings–.15 a pound, pork chops were cheap, a chunk of mozzarella lasted us all month for pizzas, and pasta. And of course, we always bought our share of canned tomatoes and boxes of macaroni. Big can of tomatoes, and a box of macaroni can be a meal when you are broke. We went home past the day old bread store and we did pretty good. Also a lot of my neighbors were deer poachers, poaching to eat. So every once in awhile, I would go out the front door and find a deer back leg on my porch. I’d pick it up, bring it in and cut it up for the freezer. It can be done. But it takes friends, bulk food stores and no packaged foods.

Posted by: Lee Ann | January 27, 2012, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

This is making a mockery of the disadvantaged citizens. All the while she is doing this media stunt, she knows that her million$ are safe in the bank. She won’t be on food stamps for ever. Maybe, she needs to thank President Obama, Newt Gingrich says Obama is a food stamp president.

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 28, 2012, 12:45 am 12:45 am

So, is the mayor promoting the expansion of the welfare state by saying food stamps should be more rewarding for people? Aye ya aye! Get an education, hold off having children until you are married with steady income. Do those 2 or 3 things and you are much less likely to ever be forced onto welfare. We need a small and limited social safety net, but this is getting out of control. Coincidentally, the article fails to mention that food stamp enrollees have increased 46% under Obama. When asked about this, Obama bragged by saying (paraphrasing) that we are working hard to get people signed up. Liberals have an interesting view of compassion: if you make someone dependent on you, thats the liberal version of compassion.

Posted by: LRB | January 28, 2012, 1:57 am 1:57 am

I have known of people letting others use their EBT cards in exchange for cash. This goes on all the time. Why does the program not find a way to stop this. Of course the money is used for things other than food.

Posted by: old lady | January 28, 2012, 2:03 am 2:03 am

I’d love to see every politician in DC be put on the same regimen for a month. If nothing else it would teach them humility. Plus, I’m sure most could afford to lose a few pounds.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 28, 2012, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Too bad the Right doesn’t level this amount of righteous indignation at the rich Wall Streeters who use our money to screw the system and add to their obscene wealth while tanking the economy and getting away scot-free. One thing about the poor: they really have crappy lobbyists.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 28, 2012, 10:41 am 10:41 am

I commend her for at least making an effort to understand what the poor suffer through on a DAILY basis and without an END IN SIGHT. I also hope she does something with the info she has learned about how it diminishes cognitive thinking…because had she stayed on it at least a year, she would have also learned that it also diminishes a LOT more then just thinking, but motor skills, energy levels, emotional and psychological behavior…but then again no one would want to suffer those symptoms by choice now would they?!

Posted by: willowlane07 | January 28, 2012, 10:57 am 10:57 am

The really sad thing is that these “food allowence” numbers have probably never been increased since the started… for example.. in Virginia and some other states there has never been an increase in the amount of “assets” that someone can have.. $2000 in the bank has been the standard since 1980! if you adust that for inflation it should be $5500 … so if you look at the other way around … that $2K cap is actually $750 in real inflation adjusted buying power

Posted by: Mitch Bupp | January 28, 2012, 11:21 am 11:21 am

There are so many judgemental comments here, about folks on assitance, it’s amazing. I have never seen so much self rightous harrumphing.

If you have never needed food stamps, consider yourselves lucky. If you need them, use them wisely. If you see someone using an EBT card, mind your own business. The right wingers love to say they are all for freedom and liberty, but want to know what’s going on in your bedroom, your lady parts, and now a persons food stamps. I pay taxes, and I think we need to feed people that can’t afford to feed themselves.

Posted by: mainemomma | January 28, 2012, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

I don’t believe that people are inherently lazy. And I believe that food stamps do not reward laziness – there is not enough value in food stamps to overcome the suffering of poverty. I do not mind my taxes being used to help others who do not have enough money. Even if they buy cake and ice cream sometimes. If you have ever been poor (and I have been there), you know that you are weak. A weak person is not lobbying for special benefits like candy. A weak person is not enjoying life. A weak person may have to borrow the fare to a job interview. A weak person cannot afford the training for a skilled job. A weak person cannot pay somebody else to take care of the kids while he or she works. I am disappointed (to say it mildly) in the lack of basic human compassion in many comments here.

Posted by: Dan | January 28, 2012, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

“Let’s give the government servants free food, free housing, free medical care, free cell phone service, free education and free transportation. Then they will vote for us to be re-elected. After all, we are using the taxpayer’s money and getting paid well to do so. The bureaucrats needed to run all this free programming will also owe us their vote”, said the wiley politician to his/her politically correct teacher’s union lobbiest. Keep this plan secret and it just might work.

Posted by: Mark | January 29, 2012, 4:45 am 4:45 am

Only people that have never had to use SNAP have ignorant things to people that do. True enough there are people that abuse the system but there are those that don’t. I just so happen to be on the program. I work a full time job and have 2 children. I get all the benefits from having a job and yet I still qualify for some government assistance. I applied for all I could and only got approved for SNAP, I am grateful for the assistance. It is put in place for everyone to take advantage of. I bet there are hundreds of thousands of people who are too embarrassed to even go to the social service office and get the assistance. I have been on the program for 6 months. I only plan on using it for a year. I should be getting a raise right around the time that I am supposed to reapply. Prayerfully I won’t need to continue to be on the SNAP. Don’t go off and judge people just because you see them with a SNAP card. Not all are screwing the system.

Posted by: MotherofTwo | January 29, 2012, 7:29 am 7:29 am

I am a mother of 4 with a full time job making $30,000 a year. For all of you who self righteous ignorant finger pointers out there. Five years ago I paying that same amount $30,000 in taxes for the business I owned. Now in the current economy I need some of MY tax dollars back to help feed my children. There are times I do splurge on special items, but for the for thousands of dollars I and my family have put in it is MY money coming back to me.

Posted by: joan | January 29, 2012, 10:05 am 10:05 am

That’s what she gets for gambling away all her salary…

Posted by: Deepwater805 | January 29, 2012, 11:49 am 11:49 am

To those of you so very critical of people who are using the program: Do you think the same things of the military member with a family who is eligible for “welfare”, as you call it? Are they lazy? Are they taking advantage of the system? Just wondering.

Posted by: Alice | January 29, 2012, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

I have to feel the pain and I have set my budget for the next seven days of $ 28 to be spent on food. I will do the best I can to try and live on this and keep a log of my expenses with shortcuts. I really dont know if I can make it seven days but I am now sure that there are many of my fellow Americans that have been doing so for some time.

Posted by: John Hix | January 29, 2012, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Not sure what state you live in, but redbull and gum cannot be purchsed with a SNAP foodstamp card in Illinois… Can’t purchase energy drinks, deli items, ready to eat or reheat foods…

That being said my husband, daughter and I live on about $400 per month in groceries by couponing and planning meals around what is on sale. But I also have a vehicle to go to multiple stores and we live in an area with plenty of choices to shop at.

Posted by: Stephanie | January 29, 2012, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

This entire exercise is overblown foolishness. SNAP — the first word of the ridiculous acronym is SUPPLEMENTAL. By definition, this means to function in a supporting capacity, not carry the weight of your entire monthly food budget. Trying to live on that amount alone is a meaningless exercise that proves nothing and goes against the very principle of the program itself, which says “…to provide food assistance and nutrition education to assist participants as they move to a healthier lifestyle and self-sufficiency.” Household Income, welfare benefits,TANF, WIC, free school lunches, and dozens of other federal and state programs also factor into the equation. But grandstanding politicians make for better headlines, I guess.

Posted by: Eric Brown | January 30, 2012, 11:06 am 11:06 am

A ten pound bag of chicken is at %59cents per pound, rice about $2.00 a bag, in the bargain stores canned goods are about 33-50cents a can…dried beans are delicious when flavored with a little low cost pork, and nutritious, bread, here in the bargain store is 99cents a loaf, during harvest season, vegetables, grown in your own yard or bought from the side of the road are available for next to nothing, we find that our neighbors give us more than we can manage to eat…A ham, is economical and provides a handsome meal, then sandwiches, omelets, and with the bone ham and beans or ham and cabbage…many meals from one piece of meat….With careful planning, coupons and buying in season and on sale, you can feed your family well on food stamps….

Posted by: Leslie Kavourakis | January 31, 2012, 10:26 am 10:26 am

As the country marches down the path of bankruptcy (16 trillion in debt) and we bleed red ink funding programs like this, the expression “the road to hell is paved with good intentions” comes to mind.

Posted by: Mike | January 31, 2012, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Our mayor is just one big publicity stunt after another. Ask her what she has ever done for the poor or homeless here in Vegas other than shoo them out of the way. This organization is one of the best in town so I’m glad they’re getting publicity, but, the Mayor is a fraud.

Posted by: Derek Washington | January 31, 2012, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Having worked in a grocery store for over 13 years, I observed that most of the foodstamp recipients spent their stamps on junk food, tv dinners and soda. At the time I lived on a very tight budget and did without convenience foods and junk. It was alot of soup, pasta and beans while working a full time job. As most of these people were not working would it have been to much to expect them to make meals for their famillies???

Posted by: Timme62 | February 1, 2012, 10:10 am 10:10 am

So one week on a program that is there for those who need it. Who is paying for the week long experiment of the mayor? Who was denied their benefit so she could partake in a useless abuse of the progrm? Is this considered fraud because she clearly does not meet the requirements of recieving the benefits. Somebody has got to pay for it! Our tax dollars pay here salary so if she is paying for then WE are paying for it! This insane abuse of spending OUR money on wasteful ideas has got to stop! What is next twoo week vacation to an exotic location to determin if suntan lotion works in that climate?

Posted by: cobbler | February 1, 2012, 10:56 am 10:56 am

For the woman who said “it’s none of your business what she uses her card on”. Sorry Sweetie, but in fact it is my and everyone’s business, because it’s OUR hard-earned money that is being loaded onto these cards each month for certain folks to abuse. Granted, some people actually use their EBT wisely to provide nutricious food for their families, but you do have those that abuse the system and buy b.s. with it. They should simplify this in one step: Run an audit of what is being bought with these cards. It wouldn’t be hard. Look at where the transactions take place with an EBT, have the store send the transaction history of what was purchased. Compare what is actually real food, compared to junk food. If there is nothing but junk food being bought on the card, send a warning letter to the card holder. If that doesn’t work, cut them off. If I live on a budget and am not on assistance and can’t splurge on what I like, what gives the right of someone who gets tax-payer’s money the right to load up on junk and other non-essentials?

Posted by: Scott | February 1, 2012, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Before these programs existed people survived by finding odd jobs, gardening, canning, hunting, and as a LAST resort charity. Families and communities pulled together and took pride in doing so. Then these programs came into existence, charity became manditory in the form of taxes, and families and communities fell apart. The people working hard for the money were given no real say in how it was spent. Politicians realized that by increasing benifits and relaxing the restrictions on whom could get them they could get reelected. The sad fact is that these people are being use by a government that has a vested interest in KEEPING them in need of got. assistance to the eventual destruction of the country. At some point the amount going to these programs will exceed the amount those who are producing it will be able to bear. This is exactly what is happening in Greece today. Is this what we want for our country?

Posted by: Shanon | February 1, 2012, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

I would love to see more politicians do this. Like Newt Gingrich who is talking so much about food stamps or Mitt Romney who says “I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there.” I think it would be a valuable life lesson.

Posted by: Jim | February 1, 2012, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

that’s why you have a bunch of kids, because they EACH get more gubment aid – good stamps, transpo, stipends, housing allowances, free clothes.
more kids = more dole!

Posted by: Sron | February 1, 2012, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

At least Mayor Goodman is doing something! This is light years ahead of useless politicians I could name. I’m sure she will be looking at the program, the entitlements, what is included and excluded in the program. That’s part of the reason she did this.. so she could get a better understanding of it. She’s a damn good mayor and she’s trying to make a difference.

Posted by: R Anderson | February 2, 2012, 5:31 am 5:31 am

To all the people who are lumping all food stamps recipients as LAZY. What about all the elderly and disabled who have paid into the system all of their lives and are left to live on a measly ssi or ssdi check? Is it their fault they make too little to purchase food and must rely on food stamps? Many of the elderly and disabled don’t have the luxury of being able to work to supplement their food stamp allotment. These are the people who are stuck living on $4.03 cents per day for food.

Posted by: Crystal | February 2, 2012, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

From the wording of the article, it would appear that the Mayor is merely participating in a demonstration by a local food bank of what it’s like to be on food stamps. That said, the $4.06 per day figure is not entirely accurate; your benefit will vary depending on your other income and obligations. In my case, I am on Social Security; I pay real estate taxes, utilities, and Medicare supplemental insurance with its attendant co-pays. The amount of my monthly Social Security benefit is reduced by the amounts paid for those “necessities” and I am eligible to receive the HUGE SUM of $37 Per Month in food stamps – about $1.22 per day. The time, energy and aggravation – plus transportation to and from the benefits office to deliver it – were sufficiently deterring that I did NOT reapply after the first year, although I could use that supplement. On the one hand, I paid taxes for over 50 years and should more easily be able to receive these needed benefits during the months when oil heat is through the roof (at minimum); on the other hand, there are many who are more destitute than I (and I’m not rich) and they should be receiving more. While I believe LEGAL immigrants who followed our laws when they entered this country and are attempting to be contributing residents Should be entitled to assistance as well since they DO pay taxes, I do NOT believe that ILLEGAL immigrants should be receiving those services – and they definitely are. My state is supporting and housing a high-profile illegal simply because her Nephew is in the White House. Let HIM support and house her and let the citizens who paid into the system be the beneficiaries of its “largess.”

Posted by: L A Graham | February 4, 2012, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

I myself am disabled and live on Social Security benefits. I am unable to do any work to try and make a little extra here and there. As most know, the SSDI benefits aren’t very good. My 28 year old mentally retarded son who is unable to work also lives with me. His Social Security benefits are cut in half because of the fact he lives with someone, yet he is unable to live on his own. Yet when I applied for food stamps here in PA, I was approved for an entire $16 a month. Most months, by the middle of the month, I have no money left in the bank. Personally I think they should put all the government officials (local and federal) onto the same amount of pay as a person gets when they are on Social Security and also the same insurance as Medicare. Then lets see them survive on what they say we all should be able to survive on.

Posted by: Mike N | February 4, 2012, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Ok before anything else is done with this program the disparity between races and sex’s in the progam needs to be fixed . why does a single black male get more than a single white male ? why do single women get more than single men ? why does a sinle father get almost half as much as a single mother with the same number of children ?

Posted by: lspiderl | February 7, 2012, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

since when were food stamps suppose to cover someones entire food bill? The stamps are to suppliment someones food supply, not be the total amount spent. Typical liberal thinking that the government should provide everything for people.

Posted by: ALAN | February 9, 2012, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Ok, must be different state by state. Here in IL a family of 6 will get almost $1000 for food stamps per month. Plus, instead of saying $4/day, put that at $30/wk – you can now buy bread, peanut butter, etc. Add some pasta in there. You can make things that last >1 meal.

Posted by: Harlon Katz | February 10, 2012, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.