Feb 11, 2012 2:12pm

Contraception Compromise Doesn’t Please Bishops

The leadership of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops denounced President Obama’s contraception compromise in a letter to its membership, citing “grave reservations” about a policy that would  allow employees of religious institutions to have access to contraception at no additional cost through insurance companies.

The revised plan, which was announced Friday,  makes contraception available to employees of religious institutions who seek it, while keeping the costs of contraception from being incurred by religious institutions that have a moral opposition to it.

According to the new plan, religious affiliated hospitals and universities will not be required to list contraception in their health plans or pay for it for their employees. Instead, the burden will fall on insurance companies, which will be mandated to provide contraception coverage to employees of abstaining institutions at no additional premium.

“It remains unclear as to how insurers will be compensated for the cost of these items, with some commentators suggesting that such compensation will ultimately be derived from the premiums paid by the religious employer,” the bishops’ letter said. “It does not meet our standard of respecting the religious liberty and moral convictions of all stakeholders in the health coverage transaction.”

The nation’s bishops also expressed a concern that the government is creating its own arbitrary definition of which organizations are “religious enough” to receive full protection under the rule.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said officials from the White House had reached out to their organization and offered to continue the dialogue to work out “questions that remained unanswered.”

After the revised plan was announced Friday, the president of the Catholic Health Association said she was “pleased.”

“The framework developed has responded to the issues we identified that needed to be fixed,” Carol Keehan said in a written statement. “We are pleased and grateful that the religious liberty and conscience protection needs of so many ministries that serve our country were appreciated enough that an early resolution of this issue was accomplished.”

Planned Parenthood also supported the president’s decision.

“In the face of a misleading and outrageous assault on women’s health, the Obama administration has reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring all women will have access to birth control coverage, with no costly co-pays, no additional hurdles, and no matter where they work,” Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards said in a written statement before the announcement.

“We believe the compliance mechanism does not compromise a woman’s ability to access these critical birth control benefits.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

These bishops should just get out of women’s business and concentrate on themselves and their priest who have sexually abused so many of our children. What do they know of women, when they cannot even control their own sexuality other than abusing others? Just stay out of our business, these mostly old men, who practice not what they try to preach. Who gives them the right to control anyone else when they are unable to control themselves.

Posted by: karuna | February 11, 2012, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Maybe the government AND the church should get out of people’s lives? But there I go giving away my Libertarian leanings.

Posted by: newcountryman | February 11, 2012, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Its so ironic that if Catholics were held to the true teachings of the church the church would in fact have about 2% of the members they have currently. If 95-98% of Catholics use birth control, technically they aren’t following the Church and should be excommunicated. What actually needs to happen is they need to OK using birth control, focus on preventing unwanted pregnancies and dealing with the ongoing pedophilia and child abuse that happens in churches all over the world. Honestly, this whole “anti-woman” agenda is a major reason I saw fit at 13 to reject my families religion and refuse to be “confirmed”. UGH! So glad I have a brain and can think for myself. There are far too many sheep in this world!!!

Posted by: cesf | February 11, 2012, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

The issue is abortion producing drugs and being forced to pay for them directly or indirectly. 3 states require Catholic Hospital to cover birth control now but none require Abortion coverage. If insurance companies cover anything for “free” or you still paying for it only indirectly.

Posted by: S Smith | February 11, 2012, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Obama is right. The bishops are whiners. If the workers work well, they deserve a pay package. If that includes insurance, the bishops are overbearing if they gut it according to their own religious beliefs. The workers are adults, and free moral agents. No different than the cash portion of the pay package — the workers can do what they want with it, and it is not a matter of conscience for the bishops. Just give standard insurance, and let the workers decide!!

Posted by: frank burns | February 11, 2012, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Now look, they can’t have it both ways. They are opposed to abortion, yet step on those who choose to do the responsible thing by using contraception. All should be able to aford it. The president tried to compromise as he now sees why initially this could have been a problem to some. What is so bad about making sure that this care is available and affordable to all? They even want to do away with Planned Parenthood, and they actually offer affordable care. they do more of that than abortions really. I wish they would pull thier heads out and understand that plenty of Catholic women use birth control anyway. Wow, this is a problem yet pedophilia is ok. I just don’t get it.

Posted by: msyellarose | February 11, 2012, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

it’s all too clear now – these sexless guys just don’t want women to use contraception, period. and no, S Smith – contraception is NOT “abortion producing drugs.” but if you want to raise the children conceived, go right ahead.

Posted by: bajacalla | February 11, 2012, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

These bishops need to worry about their own soul salvation. The catholic church is not God centered.
Their whole organization is filled with child molestation and abuse. So their church’s are not Christian based church. No man on earth can forgive you of your sins. Mary is not above Jesus. Rosemary beeds are a waste of money. The mafia controls the catholics.

Posted by: nswclb | February 11, 2012, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

These Catholic hospitals receive federal Medicare payments. You get money from the government, you play by the same rules as everybody else. It’s time we stopped giving “religious” instituions a pass and any kind of exemptions. The church needs to get off it’s high horse and get its own house in order and keep its nose out of our bedrooms and bathrooms. The Catholic church is no better than the mob and actually even worse. At least the mob doesn’t tolerate child molesters. And I was raised Catholic but realized a long time ago that I was being BS’d and sold a bill of goods.

Posted by: R J Vincent | February 11, 2012, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Tough!

Posted by: john locke | February 11, 2012, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

If Planned Parenthood is happy, the bishops better not be. Planned Parenthood is a hundred million dollar baby killing organization.

Posted by: Benjamin | February 11, 2012, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

The Catholic Church exists off the money of the poor. The more people the more money, so they don’t mind poor people having lots of kids. Has anyone ever seen a poor Bishop or Cardinal? I think it would be nice if someone did a study on the lives of all of the Bishops and Cardinals. I would bet that once people got to see how these people live there would be a huge drop in the money they get.

Posted by: Tom Adams | February 11, 2012, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

the bishops had their 15 minutes with the microphone and Obama blinked…time to move on…with 98% of their flock using birth control I’d think they are going to quickly lose support that this is an attack on religious freedom and now more of the bishops trying to stick their noses in women’s private health care…

Posted by: Paul | February 11, 2012, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

“Doesn’t Please Bishops”? So? I don’t know anyone who gives a rodent’s nether extremities about the opinion of these wolves in sheep’s clothing.

Posted by: Cassandra | February 11, 2012, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

As far back as when I was in high school (waaay far back) the Catholic kids were using contraceptives or other body parts to avoid pregnancy. Now contraceptive use is the order of the day in many (most?) Catholic households. Not even “the faithful” listen to the bishops when they make no sense so don’t expect the rest of us to care.

Posted by: Cassandra | February 11, 2012, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Jury finds Hartford archdiocese negligent, recommends $1 million in damages to ex-altar boy sexually abused in Derby
Published: Saturday, February 11, 2012

0digg

7
By The Associated Press

WATERBURY — A jury has ruled that the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Hartford should pay $1 million in damages to a former altar boy who was sexually abused by a priest decades ago.

The Hartford Courant reports the Superior Court jury in Waterbury delivered the verdict Friday after about three and a half hours of deliberations.

The jury found the archdiocese was reckless and negligent in its handling of the priest, Ivan Ferguson, formerly stationed in Derby.

The victim presented evidence that Ferguson was allowed contact with children in Derby in the early 1980s, despite admitting earlier that he had sexually abused other boys.

A lawyer for the archdiocese said the abuse was despicable. But he said Ferguson was allowed to resume contact with children only after church experts concluded he could control his attraction to boys.

Posted by: Sara Frye | February 11, 2012, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

I doubt if any of these high ranking clerics even know what a “woman’s business” looks like. Too bad that a group of fallow old bishops are trying to tell anyone what to do about reproduction.

Posted by: Ted TampaBay | February 11, 2012, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Must have woke up and realized they were being zoomed.

Posted by: newcountryman | February 11, 2012, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Well, this did get the focus off the Super PAC flak so it served it’s purpose.

Posted by: newcountryman | February 11, 2012, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Yeah, that’s right. Conservatives should make an election issue out of denying birth control coverage. LOL. Yeah, that’ll work!

Posted by: jock59801 | February 11, 2012, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Maybe if the Bishops are offended by the laws governing all employers, then they should employ an all volunteer workforce. What’s next, will they want to be exempt from federal income tax withholding and matching social security and medicare payments?

News flash to Bishops: the majority of people you are supposed to be leading use birth control already. You as an employer are not entitled to shove your views on birth control down the throats of your employees. Where was all of this sanctimonious outrage when you were investigating all of the priests who were abusing children?

Posted by: Tbone85 | February 11, 2012, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Separation of church and state! Or is it separation of state and church? Humm…….

Posted by: newcountryman | February 11, 2012, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

It seems to me that the Catholic church is practicing discrimination — gender and religious discrimination against its employees — many who may even be NON-Catholic!!! Anyway… I am glad that Obama didn’t back down much on this. The U.S. Government needs to ALWAYS stay secular!!! Unfortunately, there’s a political party (The Republicans) who want to turn the federal government into a theocracy by attempting to ban abortion, limiting gay rights, and teaching Creationism in Public Schools. This is just wrong and not what our country was founded on!!

Posted by: Spy | February 11, 2012, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

I’m not sure what the “big deal” is…The “Pill” (topic of discussion) makes it hard for the male seed to find the uterus. If it can’t find the uterus, no fertilized egg. No fertilized egg…no baby. No baby what’s the big deal? (No harm…no foul I say)
Obama’s change in position allows for a 3rd party to pay for a pack of birth control pills instead of the employer.
Since 90%+ of Catholic women in childbearing age use the pill, shall we all continue to invade their decision just because the Cardinals are still upset?
I AM Catholic …. I don’t get why the Cardinals are in such a bunch.
Unclench!

Posted by: JohnM | February 11, 2012, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

OMG – I am soooooo over these Bishops.

Posted by: Sweet Pea | February 11, 2012, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Obama will never be able to please the Catholic church because they are trying to clinch the election for the people who will make them the most money, the GOP. It’s all a ruse. The pretend religious right-wing fits their style more appropriately with emphasis on “pretend.”

Posted by: nfission | February 11, 2012, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

These old MEN need to shut the **** up! Women’s health is a subject they should have ZERO input on. As a matter of religious freedom, how is this different from preventing devout Mormons from having multiple wives? Multiple wives was theologically supported in Mormon doctrine…until the US government decided that wasn’t to be allowed. Where were the Catholic bishops then to defend religious liberty. These old hacks are irrelevant — they need to shut up.

Posted by: J S O'Brien | February 11, 2012, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Now that Obama has opened this can of worms, I think he should change his mind again. This should help his image immensely.

Posted by: Hiccup | February 11, 2012, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

I can’t think of any person or group’s opinion that I would be LESS interested in regarding contraception and women’s reproductive freedom than CATHOLIC BISHOPS.

Posted by: ponygirl1959 | February 11, 2012, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

This so called compromise, or as he puts it, accommodation, is nothing of the sort. It is nothing more than semantic theater designed to make him look good in the press. How many rights will he be allowed to step on before we stand up and say enough?

Posted by: sensible99 | February 11, 2012, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

So many clueless and evil comments against the Catholic Bishops standing up for 1st Amendment rights. “CONGRESS shall make no law respecting an ESTABLISHMENT of religion, or PROHIBITING the FREE EXERCISE thereof”. Obama has implemented a dictator edict violating the constitutiional rights of the Catholic Church. He has established the religion of the state.To say that Obama’s contraception compromise is a compromise is FALLACY, the truth is it is a stealth imposition of contraception, abortion drugs and sterilization on the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church in some areas self insure and offer medical insurance. The Bishops have clearly stated objections also in the name of it’s affiliate insurers and on behalf of all insurers dealing with the Church. The Dictator in Chief has decreased our freedoms incrementally over time to the point that many sheeple are clueless about the rights taken away from them. It is a travesty that people no longer stand for what is good but are willing slaves to evil and the false promises that evil offers. If Obama truly seeks compromise then he could sign a conscience amendment law. If Obama gets away with insurance companies paying for contraception, abortion drugs and sterilization then there will not be a need for taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood since double taxation will be an occur. The taxpayer will be paying for the cost of free contraception, abortion drugs and sterilization through increased insurance premiums. Obama wants to decrease the cost of Obamacare through dead babies..

Posted by: Jo | February 11, 2012, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

It is time for those Catholic Bishops to stop imposing their religious beliefs and standards on those of us who are not practitioners or believers of their religion – there are millions of Americans who are not Catholics so who are those men to impose their rules, their laws, their morals on the rest of the country?!!

Posted by: merridee | February 11, 2012, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

The taxpayer will be paying for the cost of free contraception, abortion drugs and sterilization through
increased insurance premiums POSTED BY: JO |********** Maybe we should abolish the tax exempt
status of organized religions altogether. This in itself would pay the cost of this insurance ten fold.

Posted by: michael | February 11, 2012, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

michael —”Maybe we should abolish the tax exempt
status of organized religions altogether. “–perhaps all taxes should be abolished!

Posted by: Jo | February 11, 2012, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

The only compromise Obama offered was a compromise on all citizen’s Religious Liberties protected by the 1st Amendment of the Constitution

Posted by: Gerry | February 11, 2012, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

The Bishops have joined John Boehner in moving the goalpost after getting what they asked for. It took them quite awhile to come up with new reasons because their 8 months of planning to damage President Obama went up in smoke with just a simple statement. Next they will ask that firemen be exempt from putting out fires at pro-choice households. They are better equipped at hiding pedophiles by shuffling them from parish to parish than playing politics.

Posted by: Tnut | February 11, 2012, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Great. The Catholics. The do as I say, not as I do religion.

Posted by: FrankBlourtango | February 12, 2012, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Will you all stop whining?
It is anyone’s religious right to oppose that. And it’s really annoying when everyone bashes Catholicism. Every religion has it’s problems, but the minute the Catholics do anything its WW3. That’s the same with Muslims too. Really people?
Learn to respect religious beliefs.

Posted by: Someone | February 12, 2012, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Contraception saves lives, it saves unwanted babies, saves people from sexually transmitted diseases but noooo, catholic bishops who have no right to oppose contraception especially when their own abuse little boys and cover it up. Shame on them, they’ll meet our maker one day and will realize they were wrong all along.

Posted by: Beni | February 12, 2012, 1:16 am 1:16 am

What too few people are failing to understand is the Catholic Church hierarchy is Republican, Always has been, always will be. This whole argument these Bishops are posing has nothing to do with religious freedom, moral convictions, or any other BS reason they wish to throw out there. It involves only one reason. They’re in league with the GOP to make Obama a one term President, and their getting a nice fat donation from the GOP for doing it. Believe me, I was a Catholic until I got smart and saw the Catholic church for what it is, and what it is a joke to Christianity.

Posted by: Jake | February 12, 2012, 3:54 am 3:54 am

…nothing a government does can please RC Bishops… that’s why the RC church has been in demise in the 20th century… i admire the RC church for holding fast to 12th century ideals, but come on… don’t dictate to us…

Posted by: jeff | February 12, 2012, 3:56 am 3:56 am

Sensible99: “Obama has implemented a dictator edict violating the constitutiional rights of the Catholic Church”.
Not exactly…the Church isn’t prohibited from believing or preaching the non-use of artificial contraceptive measures. And it remains exempt from the insurance requirement for employees actually employed by the Church and whose benefits are paid by the Church. Other businesses the Church operates are funded by customers (patients, students, public funding etc.), just like other universities and hospitals. Employees aren’t hired as Church employees or paid with Church funds and are therefore covered by labor and equal employment laws found to be Constitutional.
The real Constitutional issue is does the religious freedom protection given the Church extend to these public sector business activities AND trump the rights of individual employees to a dicrimination-free workplace. Some think yes because it involves insurance coverage of presription drugs that can be used by women employees of a certain age for a practice It doesn’t condone. I think no because these same women aren’t paid with Church funds, required to practice all tenets of the faith, subscribe to the tenets of any faith or utilize the particular prescription benefit.
The most recent demand of the Bishops makes it clear their goal is to remove contraceptives from the list of drugs included as part of the minimum standards for prescription drug plans. They’re demanding the government use Catholic Church teaching rather than recommendations from the medical community or public health benefits to determine those minimum standards. That position is stepping dangerously close to establishment of a religion.
I don’t think the fact the Church has been unable to convince Catholics to abide by this particular teaching gives it the Constitutional right to enforce the teaching through discriminatory compensation practices when it’s a non-Church employer. It retains the right to do so as a Church employer as well as the right to abstain from dispensing the drugs as a provider of services to the public.

Posted by: Ellen | February 12, 2012, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Let the bishops worry a little about the longstanding problem of pedophilia by priests, which they continue to overlook and shove under the carpet. Their worrying whether their women employees will use their insurance for birth control or not is beyond the pale. Do they also worry how their employees spend the cash portion of their pay packages? How hypocritical can you get. Throughout history, the Catholic church has never ceased to amaze for its hypocrisy and immorality. This compromise is fair. The bishops were given a yard, and they want not a mile, but the whole road. Let them whine and bemoan if they like, but reasonable people should pay them no heed. They have every religious freedom they could ask for. This is just a matter of whether their employees CAN have insurance, even when the bishops don’t pay for it. They are being outrageous to imagine they can object to that.

Posted by: frank burns | February 12, 2012, 11:35 am 11:35 am

These bishops are TOO hypocritical — to think that of all things the big thing weighing on their consciences is whether their women workers are using insurance for contraception. I just don’t believe it. They are just trying to make themselves look persnickety and good, but really coming off as silly.

Posted by: frank burns | February 12, 2012, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

I was raised as a Catholic. Or perhaps lowered. :-) Whatever. But seriously… I strongly disagree with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops statement, which denounces President Barack Obama’s attempts at compromise as “needless government intrusion in the internal governance of religious institutions”. On the contrary, the Bishops comments are themselves a needless religious intrusion upon the proper and legitimate functions of government…functions that serve to promote women’s rights, and equality, and fairness for ALL. No one is coming into our Churches and trying to tell parishioners what to believe. BUT If the Bishops want to start businesses that employ millions of people of varying faiths -or no “faith” at all- THEN they must play by the rules. Just because a religious group in America claims to believe something, we cannot excuse them from obeying the law in the PUBLIC arena, based on that belief. They can legally attempt to change the law, not to deny it outright. And if they want to plunge overtly into politics from the pulpit, then they should give up their tax-exempt status. Did I miss something, or when it comes to the “sanctity of life”, is every single righteous Catholic still a card carrying conscientious objector, refusing to take up arms, and totally against the death penalty, and contraception in all its forms? Oh well, hypocrisy is at the heart of politics, and politics masquerading as religion even more so. This country is an invigorating mixture of all the diversity that life has to offer, drawing its strength FROM that diversity. We need to work together to preserve, enrich, and strengthen this unique experiment – NOT to tear it down with poisonous, paralyzing, and un-Christian demonization of each other.

Posted by: Stan Chaz | February 12, 2012, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

There is a very strong economic force behind the contraceptive coverage for women. According to Guttmacher Instute, every dollar that the United States government spends on family planning reduces Medicaid expenditures by $3.74..

That is pretty strong motivation in today’s budget crisis.

The Bishops are free to squeal but the Republicans will cave when the going gets tough.

Posted by: msgijoe | February 12, 2012, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

What if a religious employer decided it was in its religion to not hire any Black people or Asian people?. Now do you think the government would let THAT fly??? I don’t think so… so really why is this any different??? Also Catholic hospitals receive federal funds in the form of Medicare and Medicaid… so why should THEY mandate to the government what they will or will not do for their employees???

Posted by: Spy | February 12, 2012, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

I seriously think the Bishops should keep their noses out of the abortion thing…..talk about pointing fingers, after what they have been doing to children??? Come on.

Posted by: judy | February 27, 2012, 10:23 am 10:23 am

The Catholic church needs to stay out of politics. I don’t know of any other religion that gets so involved with our laws as the Catholic church does. What if, now we have to start following the Muslims, or the very conservative christian religions who keep their women in long hair and skirts. We have to keep seperation of church and state. I am Catholic and the church does good work with the Catholic charites for sure. But in this case they need to stay neutral. No one is forcing the Catholics to use birth control. This is for people who work in the schools and universities and want it covered. If the churcy is accepting federal funds for hospitals and schools then they should abide by everything or don’t take the money. It is cheaper to cover birth control than a pregnancy and childbirth or medical complications that come with it. We can’t start letting religions dictate what we can do in this country.

I don’t know why the Bishops continually think Catholics don’t use birth control.I don’t know anyone from my generation or the present who don’t or haven’t used some form of birth control. Havw the priests noticed the size of families in church today? 3 children at the most. How do they think that these mother avoid large families!! They should do their research. The Catholic schools and churches do not have the influence they once had. All the young kids are cohabitating before marriage, even those who attended Catholic school, divorced Catholics receive communion, etc.

The priests and bishops themselves are Cafeteria catholics. The church also teaches that sex before marriage is a sin and so is living together yet they continually marry the young couples who live together. Alot of times they don’t ask or the kids lie. And to ask them to stop living together until the marriage, how ridiculous is that!!! What does that accomplish? Nothing. It makes the priests feel they are not being hypocritical in marrying cohabiting couples in the church. They marry the couples in the church because they don’t want these couples to go elsewhere and thus lose more Catholics. . The bishops of NY decides that he will give us a “pass” from abstaining from meat on Friday if St Patrick’s day falls on a Friday. Really? Why? Because he knows people will eat the meat. What if I decide on a Friday I don’t want to abstain because I am going to a party? The Eastern rite priests can be married. And the church allows Episcopal ministers to convert to Catholisism even if they are married!! How is that fair to the priests who can’t be married!! Eastern Rite priests may be married also!!!

And ask about RCIA classes for those who want to become Catholic. Some priests allow divorced people who are remarried become Catholics and “hope” they apply for an annulment. Really? Do you think the church won’t give it to them? They don’t want them to leave the church after making the decision to become Catholic. I have been told they don’t even talk about the birth control issue in these classes.

If priests and bishops could get married the whole birth control issue would be a mute point. That is probably why they don’t allow it. Priests being married isn’t God’s law. They would understand how expensive it is to have a large family in todays economy and how expensive it is to send their kids to college. It makes me made so see the wealth the Pope lives in but to expect other Catholics to not covet material goods.

Posted by: Sheila | April 30, 2012, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.