Senators Pan Pfizer’s Plan to Block Generic Lipitor
Pfizer’s plan to persuade health insurance and benefits companies to favor Lipitor over its new generic competition has three senators crying foul.
The patent on Lipitor, the cholesterol-lowering statin that earned Pfizer more than $5.3 billion in annual U.S. sales, has now expired, opening the door for cheaper generic versions. But Pfizer is offering large discounts to pharmacy benefit managers — the middlemen between drug companies and health insurance providers — that block the competition.
“Consumers and taxpayers foot the bill when drug benefit companies and insurers manipulate the marketplace to prevent access to generic drugs for millions of Americans,” Sen. Herb Kohl (D-Wis.) said in a statement. “We hope that scrutiny into these business practices will restore fairness and open the gates to affordable prescription drug choices and tremendous cost savings.”
Kohl joined Senators Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) in asking Pfizer, three pharmacy benefit companies and two insurance companies for more information about the agreements, citing concerns about the impact on health care costs.
“By working with manufacturers to push brand-name drugs, drug benefit companies may be abusing Medicare to boost their profits and denying generic alternatives to patients – a practice that needs to end immediately,” Baucus said in a statement. “We need to take a close look to ensure we’re protecting both taxpayer dollars and access to the medicine patients need.”
Under Pfizer’s plan, which was first reported by the New York Times, the co-pay for a 30-day supply of Lipitor would drop to $10 — the same co-pay as generic versions. The Senators worry pharmacy benefit managers will continue charging employers and Medicare the full cost of the drug and pocket the difference. In letters to the companies, they’re asking for clarification.
“In what’s been reported, just about everyone wins except consumers and taxpayers,” Grassley said in a statement. “That’s cause for scrutiny, and these letters reflect a commitment to looking at how to prevent the system from being manipulated so that access to generic drugs is restricted and taxpayers are forced to unnecessarily pay brand-name drug prices.”
Using data from 2005 to 2008, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that 25 percent of adults over age 45 used statins — up from 2 percent in the mid-1990s. And between 1999 and 2007, deaths associated with heart disease declined by 28 percent.
“Generics will facilitate access to statins,” Stephen Nicholls, clinical director of the Cleveland Clinic Center for Cardiovascular Diagnostics and Prevention, told ABC News in November. “And in light of the overwhelming body of evidence that statins are good medications, increased access is a positive outcome.”
On Wednesday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first generic version of Lipitor, made by Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Ranbaxy has exclusive rights to sell the generic for 180 days, during which time it will be Lipitor’s sole competitor.
In an email to ABC News, Pfizer spokesman MacKay Jimeson said the senators’ letter is based on “incomplete and incorrect information.”
“Our intent is to offer Lipitor to payers and patients at or below the cost of a generic during the 180-day period. As a result, patients receive Lipitor at co-pays comparable to generics,” he wrote. “Participation in Pfizer’s programs by a health plan is entirely voluntary. It is not imposed on any plan either by Pfizer or their [pharmacy benefit manager].”
The senators asked the companies to respond to their letters no later than Dec. 21.

Email
Man Discovers He's a Woman at the Hospital
Head Trauma, Behavior Problems Linked
This is MacKay Jimeson from Pfizer.
The Senators’ questions are based upon an earlier article that contained incomplete and incorrect information about our Lipitor programs. We want the public to understand the facts.
Our intent is to offer Lipitor to payers and patients at or below the cost of a generic during the 180-day period. As a result, patients receive Lipitor at co-pays comparable to generics.
Participation in Pfizer’s programs by a health plan is entirely voluntary. It is not imposed on any plan either by Pfizer or their PBM.
We have contracted with PBMs and health plans that serve Medicare Part D patients. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services considers all rebates received directly or indirectly from pharmaceutical manufacturers to be price decreases that reduce the drug costs incurred by Part D plans.
Posted by: MacKay Jimeson | December 1, 2011 December 1, 2011, 3:01 pm
Our intent is to offer Lipitor to payers and patients at or below the cost of a generic during the 180-day period.—————–Yeah , but why just 180 days ? More bait and switch ( aka good honest American capitalism ) I’d guess .
Posted by: davem | December 1, 2011 December 1, 2011, 3:41 pm
Let’s try to remember that Pfizer spent probably a billion dollars to develop and test Lipitor, and spent a billion more on drugs that never came to market. On top of that, their patent clock started not when the FDA approved the drug, but when they actually started clinical trials. Without profits, there is NO MONEY to develop the next lipitor. Generics are great, but the profit is about the same as on a can of peas. You can’t run multiple billion dollar drug trials on generic profits. Pay generic prices now, see fewer lifesaving drugs in the future. Keep Pfizer healthy, and they keep some of the most brilliant scientists in the world working on new drugs. Once the US system is taken over by the bureaucrats, you’ll watch all medical decisions be made based on price, and see the drug development slow down to a crawl because no one can afford to commit billions to research with no possibility of earning their money back.
Posted by: Dave C | December 1, 2011 December 1, 2011, 10:55 pm
Lipitor had sales in the tens of billions on Lipitor so certainly they have had time to recoup al their costs. They will only be able to compete in the 180 day window for generics because during this time there is limited competition. The bigger generic companies like Teva are left out for 180 days. When they come on board, Pfizer will not be able to meet their lower costs and Pfizer will likely revert to selling the brand name at higher prices to those that refuse to take the generic version.
Posted by: Richard T | December 2, 2011 December 2, 2011, 5:36 am
If this isn’t a perfect example of rogue business dealings from Pfizer, I don’t know what is. More and more data is coming out denouncing statins as they do not and have not, as all of the trials and studies such as Framingham, Oslo and Helsinki have indicated, that taking statins HAVE NOT REDUCED THE RISK OF MYCARDIAL INFARCTION. Statins have become the fleece of healthcare today.
Posted by: stephen | December 2, 2011 December 2, 2011, 8:17 am
After making Lipitor tablets for all these years Pfizer should be able to continue to do so for far less cost than any generic maker. How about “thank you for seventeen years of patent protection”. We will now deliver you a very low priced generic for as long and there is a big demand for this drug.Not for just 180 days.
Posted by: DENNIS | December 2, 2011 December 2, 2011, 8:38 am
Some of you are not understanding what this 180 day period is. By law, limited generic competition is allowed for the first 180 days after a patent expires. Congress established this 180 day period. This also means drug prices do not drop significantly during this time. After that 180 day period generics will flood the marketplace, and prices will drop significantly.
Pfizer has actually done the most of any company before them to increase competition during this 180 day period. Pfizer is essentially operating like a generics company and lowering the total cost of Lipitor below the price of the generic competitors. This means patients will continue to get the brand drug Lipitor at generic prices.
Posted by: Bob | December 2, 2011 December 2, 2011, 8:55 am
Just another example of the Greed in Health Care. Big Pharma is a joke in America. Bleeding hearts say that Pfizer spent billions to create and manage Lipitor. That is true but with the tax loop hole big pharma uses, they pay virtually no taxes for the R&D, start up trials, and distribution. So they have pocketed billions for years. Oh I Know without billions there will be no new drugs. That is fine – ask yourself why the US has a shortage of low cost drugs available? (currently over a thousand) Big Pharma and Distributors like McKesson are price fixing AWP’s and only moving what is profitable. Greed killed the Auto industry in this country and will have the same effect in Healthcare.
Posted by: Mike | December 2, 2011 December 2, 2011, 9:01 am