Jan 13, 2012 11:30am

A Link Between Sausage and Cancer?

Eating a single serving of processed meat per day might increase your risk of pancreatic cancer, a new study suggests. Experts say the cancer risk is still small, but reducing the amount of processed meat in your diet is a healthy move.

Based on a review of seven previously published studies, Swedish researchers found the risk of pancreatic cancer was 19 percent higher among men and women who ate roughly 4 ounces of processed meat per day. That’s about one link of sausage or four pieces of bacon. The study was published in the British Journal of Cancer.

“Right now, your lifetime risk of getting pancreatic cancer is 1.4 percent,” said ABC News senior health and medical editor Dr. Richard Besser. “If you have a serving of processed meat per day, your risk would go up to 1.7 percent; still very small.”

Pancreatic cancer affects roughly one in 65 men and women, according to the National Cancer Institute. But because it’s usually advanced by the time it’s detected, the five-year survival rate is only 5.5 percent.

Although the cancer’s cause is unknown, it’s more common among people who smoke, have diabetes or are obese, confounding variables that make it hard to tease out the role of processed meats alone. “When you’re combining a lot of different studies, it’s sometimes hard to take all of that into account,” Besser said.

Processed meats have also been linked to colon and bladder cancer. And because they’re high in salt and fat, they can raise the risk of other health problems, too. “We’ve always said don’t eat a lot of processed meats,” Besser said.

As for the cancer link, the study authors suspect it might stem from nitrites, chemical preservatives broken down in the stomach and carried to the pancreas through the bloodstream. “If you want to cut down on that,” Besser said, “you can look for products that don’t have nitrites.”

The American Meat Institute Foundation maintains that red and processed meat is “a healthy part of a balanced diet” and that nutrition decisions should be based on the total body of evidence, not single studies.

“Too often, epidemiological findings are reported as ‘cased closed’ findings, as if a researcher has discovered the definitive cause of a disease or illness,” AMIF president James Hodges said in a statement. “All of these studies struggle to disentangle other lifestyle and dietary habits from meat and processed meat and admit that they can’t do it well enough to use their conclusions to accurately recommend people change their dietary habits. What the total evidence has shown, and what common sense suggests, is that a balanced diet and a healthy body weight are the keys to good health.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

I am selling my Jimmie Dean stock!

Posted by: Jim | January 13, 2012 January 13, 2012, 12:14 pm

If this is true, how are there any Germans left alive?

Posted by: Dave | January 13, 2012 January 13, 2012, 12:25 pm

I would request the study go a little further. I believe it is not the consumption of meats, but the quality of meats influencing the study. Meats of a lower cut and preserved by artificial means would lend to cancer causing agents being induced into the system. However, high end cuts, consumed fresh, would seem unlikely to produce negative side effects. All consumption must be done in moderation, and with the recommended daily allowances of fruits, vegetables, and water; but I think it necessary for the study to analyze whether the toxins are coming from something else.

Posted by: MMoore | January 13, 2012 January 13, 2012, 1:05 pm

41% of all Americans that consume water will die from cancer.

Posted by: LW | January 13, 2012 January 13, 2012, 3:01 pm

Soooo, to sum up various publications over time and different outlets: (that is if one is inclined to synthesize news): eating meat in any form whatsoever has NO health benefits, but a multitude of negative and destructive, health-threatening effects… not to mention the regular food poisoning bouts which necessitate recalls of massive amounts of meat from stores…
What should folks take away from this? Meat is NO good to eat for anybody who wants to preserve her/his health.
Oh, but we can’t say that clear and loud, the meat breading and producing industries of this country – very powerful lobbies – won’t have it! After all, who cares about OUR health? We are just a commodity on whose back the meat, medical and pharma industries are making mega bucks! If any of us die…. big deal! There is more from where we came from….

Posted by: Moneva | January 13, 2012 January 13, 2012, 3:25 pm

Do you realize that nearly everyone who died this past month has H2O within the past 24 hours, it should be illegal.

Posted by: WDG | January 13, 2012 January 13, 2012, 6:03 pm

A “link?” You gotta love headline writers!

Posted by: John Lentini | January 13, 2012 January 13, 2012, 6:58 pm

I learned about this in the 1980.
It is not the meat at all but the nitrate. Nitrite was banned around that time because of a cancer connection. Nitrate coud stay until a substitut was found! That never happened and now nitrite is sneaking back.

Posted by: Gunnel jonsson | January 14, 2012 January 14, 2012, 2:45 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.