Aug 29, 2011 12:30pm

Obama Taps Labor Expert To Head Council Of Economic Advisers

ABC News’ Mary Bruce (@marykbruce) Reports:

President Obama today announced that he is nominating labor economist Alan Krueger to lead his Council of Economic Advisers, saying he expects Krueger to provide him with “unvarnished” advice on the economy.

Ahead of his much-anticipated announcement next week outlining a new jobs initiative, Obama said today that it’s “more important than ever” that the council provide “recommendations not based on politics, not based on narrow interests, but based on the best evidence, based on what’s going to do the most good for the most people in this country.”

“We need folks in Washington to make decisions based on what's best for the country, not what's best for any political party or special interest,” Obama said in the Rose Garden.

The president called growing the economy “our urgent mission” and, once again, said he will unveil “a series of steps that Congress can take immediately” to create jobs. Obama has been calling for lawmakers to increase investments in infrastructure, extend the payroll tax cut and reform the patent system, among other measures.

Describing him as “one of the nation’s leading economists,” Obama said Krueger will being a “wealth of experience to the job.”

Krueger, 50, previously served as the Chief Economist at both the Treasury and Labor Departments. He is also a Princeton University professor. If confirmed, Krueger would take the place of Austan Goolsbee, who left the position earlier this month to return to teaching at the University of Chicago.

“It's going to be tough to fill the shoes of Austan Goolsbee, who's been a great friend and adviser who I've relied on for years,” Obama said. “But I have nothing but confidence in Alan as he takes on this important role as one of the leaders of my economic team.”

Today’s announcement completes a shake-up of the White House economic team that has left Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner as the only remaining official from Obama’s original circle of advisers.

Previous Council of Economic Advisers chair Christina Romer left in September 2010, National Economic Council director Larry Summers returned to Harvard in January, and Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag left last July.

Following speculation that Geithner was also readying to leave, Treasury announced earlier this month that the Secretary is in fact staying in his current position.

This post has been updated.

User Comments

This is exactly what we do not need: another person who will advocate more and more government intervention into the economy. Government intervention and spending is the root cause of our economic stagnation.
What Obama is going to do is make a bunch of proposals including more RECKLESS SPENDING and TAX INCREASES that he knows cannot pass the House. Then he will use that outcome to campaign indicating the Republicans are not working to fix the economy. This is DIRTY POLITICS of the highest order. Obama is putting his reelection AMBITION ahead of what is good for the country. Getting elected is more important than the SUFFERING of the American people to Obama. This COMPLETE DISREGARD for the welfare of the American people shows how urgent it is to vote Obama out of office.
Obama has made it clear he plans to spend $1 BILLION to try to get reelected. Spending $1 BILLION while the American people are suffering shows how out of touch Obama is. Having the taxpayers pay for what was just a campaign trip shows his disdain for the suffering of the American people.
The fact is the American economic problems will never be solved. All of the people living off the governments dime (welfare, food stamps, government employees, etc.) will continue to vote for the SPEND, PRINT, REGULATE, and TAX DEMOCRATS. The SPEND, PRINT, REGULATE, and TAX DEMOCRATS will continue to vote for the maintenance and extension of these programs so they can keep getting elected. It is a downward spiral with no viable solution unless all of us not living off the government’s dime vote 100% to replace the SPEND, PRINT, REGULATE, and TAX DEMOCRATS.
Obama engaged in a reckless stimulus spending plan which only did more harm than good. That money was used to offset financial mismanagement at the state level. The projects that were funded by that money only gave a temporary increase in business to certain businesses but BUSINESS DID NOT CREATE PERMANENT JOBS TO MEET THAT DEMAND. Why? Because the stimulus was a temporary increase in spending and did not represent a long term increase in business. Businesses met that one time increase without hiring many people. The reckless stimulus spending did not create an investment opportunity for business. The only way we will see real, long term growth in jobs is if we eliminate the oppressive regulation of business (not Wall Street), change the tax structure so it is comparable to other countries, allow businesses the flexibility to make labor more efficient and STOP THE SPENDING.
Printing money did not work because interest rates were already as low as they could go. More dollars chasing the same amount of good and service means price increases not more jobs.
Our bloated and inefficient government is what is thwarting job and economic growth and the reckless stimulus spending and the reckless printing of money have not and will not do anything to fix it.
Obama is so h*ll bent of “taxing the rich” (whatever that means) because it is a campaign strategy not because it is good for the country. Obama is obsessed with getting reelected so he can ram more of his “hope and change” left-wing, near socialistic programs into law. The Democrats with Obama in charge will continue to spend and spend. More and more social programs will mean more and more people with little incentive to work and more and more voters living off the programs advocated by the SPEND, PRINT, REGULATE, and TAX DEMOCRATS . His “taxing the rich” attitude will send more and more jobs out of the country.
Mr. Obama: stop campaigning, stop SPENDING, TAXING, and REGULATING and do what is good for the country.
We must continue to VOTE THEM OUT!!!

Posted by: AngryMobVoter | August 29, 2011, 10:59 am 10:59 am

How ’bout just tapping into the onshore oil we have right here in America?
Not to mention tapping into reducing the federal regulations that have been strangulating our economy for the last 40 years.

Posted by: EPU | August 29, 2011, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Previous Council of Economic Advisers chair Christina Romer left in September 2010, National Economic Council director Larry Summers returned to Harvard in January, and Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag left last July.
They recognized this failing President and left
Following speculation that Geithner was also readying to leave, Treasury announced earlier this month that the Secretary is in fact staying in his current position.
Time for TurboTax Timmy to leave also

Posted by: America in Decline | August 29, 2011, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Krueger on Jan 12, 2009:
“Why not pass a 5 percent consumption tax to take effect two years from now? There are many different ways to implement a consumption tax, but for simplicity think about a national sales tax.”
So, his answer is giving more money to the government instead of the government spending less.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | August 29, 2011, 11:14 am 11:14 am

You would think by now that these Collage professor types are not working. You need
people who live in the every day world,
that know all the hoops being thrown at you
by the government. That can honestly access
how to get the economy growing again. If
your some book worm on a collage campus
I very much doubt you know all the problems of managing employees, taxes,
incoming and outgoing shipping costs that
change as much as fuel prices do, and what to do about Obamacare and the
upcoming cost of that on your business.
Let alone the daily malfunctions of equipment, and advertising your product.

Posted by: deadwrestler | August 29, 2011, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Ridiculous. Our government has a serious spending problem and this guy’s first reaction to it in 2009 was to float an idea that would tax us more and lead to more government revenue.
He is the last person we need as the Lead on this administration’s economic team.

Posted by: J.R. | August 29, 2011, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Then he will use that outcome to campaign indicating the Republicans are not working to fix the economy
+++++++++++++++++==
Well he should because they’re not. They haven’t proposed any legislation to help job creation and their voodoo economic ideology of cutting spending while unemployment is high will do nothing to help the economy. I hope working class Americans are starting to understand that all this focus on long term problems like debt and the entitlements is a huge diversion to cover for the fact that they have no intention or capability to help our short term and much bigger problems; a slow economy and high unemployment.

Posted by: Skip | August 29, 2011, 11:18 am 11:18 am

The government takes in $2.5T each year in revenue. $8K for every man, woman, and child in America isn’t enough already? How about starting with the revenue and adjusting the spending, rather than starting with the spending and trying to adjust the revenue?

Posted by: Publius | August 29, 2011, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Well he should because they’re not. They haven’t proposed any legislation to help job creation
Posted by: Skip | Aug 29, 2011 11:18:44 AM
What legislation have Obama and the Dems proposed? They had 2 years to do it ON THEIR OWN, and did nothing.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | August 29, 2011, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Wasnt the Cash for Clunkers his idea??? Were in trouble.

Posted by: billy bob | August 29, 2011, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Pretty funny hiring a labor expert to help solve a problem with massive government spending and massive unemployment. Obama would do better to hire a ‘Scott Walker’ type, someone with a proven track record and ideals that would help solve the problem.

Posted by: lindz1989 | August 29, 2011, 11:43 am 11:43 am

What legislation have Obama and the Dems proposed? They had 2 years to do it ON THEIR OWN, and did nothing
+++++++++++++++++
Tell that to Rick Perry. He balanced his state budget in Texas and is claiming to have created all kinds of jobs…and did it by spending billions in federal dollars from the stimulus legislation which Democrats passed.

Posted by: Skip | August 29, 2011, 11:44 am 11:44 am

AngryMobVoter -
Super Synopsis of our Sad Federal Government and its fiscal woes – Seemingly Too Long, but, for a few of us, it was:
Succinct, concise, pointed/precise, articulate, and, most importantly, accurate.
Unfortunately, because of its length, most folks will never read it – so, in the end, only you and the choir understand the hymn.

Posted by: DJESQ | August 29, 2011, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Pretty funny hiring a labor expert to help solve a problem with massive government spending and massive unemployment
++++++++++++++++++++
Our biggest problem is lack of demand because of a lack of consumer buying power. Workers are consumers. The idiocy in the Republican plan is further cutting into pay and benefits for working class Americans will do nothing to help the economy or unemployment. They’re already trying austerity in Europe…and it’s crushing any economic growth, stalling the recovery, and we’ve felt the negative repercussions on the stock market over here. We need to stop the Republicans from foisting the same failed policies on the United States.

Posted by: Skip | August 29, 2011, 11:56 am 11:56 am

for a few of us, it was:
Succinct, concise, pointed/precise, articulate, and, most importantly, accurate
++++++++++++++++++++
Yes we know Republicans enjoy big baloney sandwiches….there isn’t a fact in the entire thing…just biased opinion.

Posted by: Skip | August 29, 2011, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Today the U.N. announced the resurgence
of Bird Flu. This can only mean the government is up to no good behind those
always closed doors meetings.

Posted by: deadwrestler | August 29, 2011, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

This COMPLETE DISREGARD for the welfare of the American people shows how urgent it is to vote Obama out of office
++++++++++++++++++++++
The Tea Party cares about the welfare of the American people by cutting their benefits, protections, and lowering their standard of living, just so the Tea Party can diligently defend tax breaks and loopholes for their favorite constituents.

Posted by: Skip | August 29, 2011, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

@AngryMobVoter
Well done.

Posted by: foggy | August 29, 2011, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Our bloated and inefficient government is what is thwarting job and economic growth
+++++++++++++++++
No, lack of consumer demand and spending is thwarting job growth.

Posted by: Skip | August 29, 2011, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

We need intellectuals like Krueger to create government regulations that are necessary to keep businesses in check and protect workers and consumers. When the free market fails, we should put our trust in those who can reduce the gap between the rich and the poor.

Posted by: Harry | August 29, 2011, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

The fact is the American economic problems will never be solved. All of the people living off the governments dime (welfare, food stamps, government employees, etc.)
+++++++++++++++++
It is reprehensible in the extreme to blame our economic problems on the poor and disadvantaged as well as government employees who are working on public services while the top 1% takes home almost a quarter of all earnings and pays very low tax rates. Protecting these low tax rates is the primary agenda of the Tea Party.

Posted by: Skip | August 29, 2011, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

(R) 2012 RICK PERRY Presidential White House: The BEST challenge to create MORE careers NOT just-a-job to American citizens who are majoring in Liberal Arts, start 2013 US President RICK PERRY White House: 1) Republicans will put ex-President John F. Kennedy founded Peace Corps as a CIA’s low-level department led by (R) KRISTIE KENNEY as the 2013 CEO of Peace Corps. The Liberal Arts students will apply 4-year undergraduate Scholarship instead of student-loan, after graduate the BA, then go overseas to serve Peace Corps to teach English, Maths, Agricultural Sciences,.. NO MORE CASH TO Foreign Aids, but Peace Corps’ foreign affairs. 2) To go beyond ex-President Ronald Reagan founded Charter School, the 2013 President RICK PERRY’s Secretary of Education will provide the non-Teachers-Union “Public Experimential Schools” occupied by the nearby public universities’ College of Education to replace those low grade, high dropout closeout public schools. The PERRY founded “Public Experimential Schools” is choice of Academic One Straight Dragon heads from K -to- Pre-College Freshmen (more advanced than Grade 12th level). 3) Will upgrade a BAAS (Bachelor of Applied Arts and Sciences) degree after 2-year Community College’s AA or AAS degree, MORE affordable 4-year Community College’s BAAS degree programs to the blacks, Latinos, and Veterans. May consider to upgrade US Navy SEAL scholarshipto a BAAS degree in Physical Education. Obama should know that to put a word “NEW” to an unpopular merchandise may be can improve the Sales; always to change cabinet-members or advisors are made no difference if Obama’s direction and strategy are WRONG from his 2009 first step since his Obama-Bernanke’s QE1 and QE2 were ALL FAILED and have been wasting trillion$ dollar already. Too little and too late to repair highways again .. And the bankrupt USA does not need the Made-in-China UNSAFE Bullet HighSpeed trains built as Obama thinks, only wating money.

Posted by: chankawah | August 29, 2011, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

“Krueger, a labor economist and member of Princeton’s faculty, served as assistant Treasury secretary for economic policy during the first two years of the Obama administration. He favors “a future consumption tax to fix today’s economy,” as well as a higher minimum wage, which his research purports to demonstrate does not depress employment. He was also one of the minds behind the Cash for Clunkers program.”
Apparently the genius behind Cash for Caulkers was not available.

Posted by: foggy | August 29, 2011, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

When the free market fails, we should put our trust in those who can reduce the gap between the rich and the poor.
Posted by: Harry |
Like Hugo or Fidel.

Posted by: foggy | August 29, 2011, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

The more people there are on food stamps, the more people government is taking care of. Those of you who have jobs to pay taxes so others can eat should count your lucky stars and quit complaining. If it weren’t for SNAP, these poor people would be kicking your door in for food -would you prefer that?

Posted by: Harry | August 29, 2011, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

reduce the gap between the rich and the poor
+++++++++++++++++++++++
The Tea Party is dedicated to making that gap wider, by protecting tax breaks and loopholes for their favored constituents while slashing benefits and protections for everybody else.

Posted by: Skip | August 29, 2011, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

What legislation have Obama and the Dems proposed? They had 2 years to do it ON THEIR OWN, and did nothing
+++++++++++++++++
Tell that to Rick Perry. He balanced his state budget in Texas and is claiming to have created all kinds of jobs…
Posted by: Skip | Aug 29, 2011 11:44:09 AM
9.1% unemployment. When the Dems took over the Senate and the House in 2007, unemployment was 4.6%.
The Dems wasted BILLIONS on “stimulus” and anything else they could spend on. Without passing budgets.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | August 29, 2011, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

If it weren’t for SNAP, these poor people would be kicking your door in for food -would you prefer that?
Posted by: Harry | Aug 29, 2011 12:48:30 PM
Another poster who justifies violence. Do you know flash override?

Posted by: wheresmymoney | August 29, 2011, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

And the bankrupt USA
+++++++++++++++++++++
The USA is far from bankrupt…there is still plenty of wealth and potential for economic growth in this country…it’s just that the Tea Party and the rest of the Republicans don’t want to advertise how much wealth there is and who has most of it because they want to keep it where it is at the expense of working class Americans.

Posted by: Skip | August 29, 2011, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

ANGRYMOBVOTER | AUG 29, 2011 10:59:25 AM
Posted: “Mr. Obama: stop campaigning, stop SPENDING, TAXING, and REGULATING and do what is good for the country.”
Where is the line? Exactly when is no spending, no taxes and no regulations sweepingly “good for the country”? No Postal Service, no Food Stamps, no interstate highways?
Specify which “oppressive regulations on businesses” are “good for the country”? Clean air? Clean water? Uncontaminated food?
For the sake of argument, let’s say the US continues the Bush era tax cuts forever while reducing spending on “all of the people on welfare, food stamps, government employees, etc.”
What is today’s Libertarian flavored GOP’s calculation for how much suffering is a worthy trade for a minuscule Middle Class tax reduction, while piling up more capital gains benefits for the Uber-rich? Little kids without food? Increase in crime? More deaths for those without utilities?
And “SPENDING”? The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities explains our national deficit in an easy to read chart: the Bush-era tax cuts and the Iraq and Afghanistan wars (+ interest) account for almost HALF of the projected public debt by 2019. The combination of this economic downturn and Obama “spending” are a much smaller piece of the projected debt increase.
Clearly, our nation has this huge “loan” from war spending. Time to pay it back; obviously, the quicker the better to reduce massive interest charges. Taxing the top 1% – now sitting on multi-Trillions in invest-able money – is a simple short term solution. Why is that “off the table”?

Posted by: green.goddess | August 29, 2011, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Listen to all the “experts”. The man hasn’t even served yet but there are so many yapping away at what a failure his appointment will become. Jeez, try being postive for a change. Don’t we want this country to provide jobs, thereby increasing consumption, thereby improving the economy.
And to “deadwrestler”, it is spelled college not “collage”.

Posted by: findlayway | September 1, 2011, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Another thinker, and do nothing, with no business experience. How many time can he do the same thing with no results.. Where is his written plan…

Posted by: firedup49 | September 6, 2011, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Ah, more of the same failed policies. Has anybody in this administration every thought that maybe if the appointed somebody WHO HAS HELD A REAL JOB might give better insight that someone that has not? This is a real live country populated by real live people and I with this President would quit treating it like a college experiment. You could take every college professor in this country and none of them would have the understanding to keep or hold a job. That would be like taking somebody with 30 years in an auto plant assembly line and have him teach a business class on marketing.

Posted by: ROYSTOLL2 | September 13, 2011, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.