Mitt Romney Goes To The Head Of The (Debate) Class (The Note)
By MICHAEL FALCONE (@michaelpfalcone) and AMY WALTER (@amyewalter)
He may no longer be ahead in many national polls, but as a presidential debater, last night’s performance by Mitt Romney in Orlando proved he’s at the head of the class.
The former Massachusetts governor is the 2012 Republican primary’s star student and debates are his best subject. That showed on stage as he landed a number of clean hits on Texas Gov. Rick Perry, whose responses to some questions were more uneven, and, at times, rambling.
As one smart Republican strategist told The Note after the debate, “The only thing more crisp than Mitt Romney’s answers was the white shirt he gave them in. He will regret the, ‘there’s a lot of reasons not to elect me’ quip, but otherwise he looked as good as he ever has.”
That’s not to say that Perry didn’t find his voice at times during the two-hour contest sponsored by Fox News and Google and held in Florida — an important primary state. He successfully called Romney out for changing his tune between printings of his book, “No Apologies,” on whether the health care plan he signed into law in Massachusetts should be a model for the rest of the country. http://abcn.ws/qSPgHq
And he has opened up a fresh line of attack on his rival by bringing up Romney’s stance on the Obama administration education initiative, Race to the Top.
“Being in favor of the Obama ‘Race to the Top,’” Perry said. “That is not conservative.”
“Nice try,” Romney snapped. “I don’t support any particular program that he’s described.” (But a town hall meeting in Miami earlier this week, Romney said elements of Race to the Top “make sense,” and should be carried out on the state level.)
Still, Perry offered a head-scratcher of an answer to a question about what he would do if, as president, he received a 3 a.m. phone call informing him that a Pakistani nuclear weapon had fallen into terrorist hands.
His started his answer by saying: “Obviously before you ever get to that point you have to build a relationship in that region and that’s one of the things this administration has not done.” He went on to talk about selling F-16s to India and somehow fit in a reference to Taiwan.
In the spin room after the debate, one of Romney’s chief strategists, Eric Fehrnstrom, delighted in calling Perry’s response to the foreign policy question “completely unintelligible.”
Perry even whiffed on what should have been a home run — calling out Romney as a flip-flopper. He rambled and stumbled and ultimately lost any chance he had to get in a clean kill.
The night was not a slam-dunk for Romney. And the Perry team can console themselves with this: there’s no direct correlation between being a strong debater and winning the nomination. That and the fact that very few voters are actually tuning into these early back and forth between these candidates.
However, Perry does have to worry that as a relatively unknown candidate these debates are going to start to define him in the exact opposite way than he is trying to portray himself. In real life, Perry projects a swagger and a confidence. On stage, he looks unsure and small.
More from ABC Political Director Amy Walter’s analysis of last night’s debate: http://abcn.ws/qgNaKF
ABC FACT CHECKS:
Perry Misstated Relationship With Dying Woman: ABC’s Arlette Saenz reports: Although Rick Perry said at a debate on Thursday that he was “lobbied” by a 31-year-old woman suffering from cervical cancer to require young girls to receive the HPV vaccine, he did not meet the cancer patient until after he had already issued his executive order mandating the vaccine. It was a rhetorical high point for Perry at the debate in Florida, when he put a personal face on the story and pointed to his friendship with a woman who later died of cervical cancer. “I got lobbied on this issue. I got lobbied by a 31 year old young lady who had stage 4 cervical cancer,” said Perry. “I spent a lot of time with her. She came by my office She talked to me about this program. I readily admitted we should have had an opt-in but I don’t know what part of opt out most parents don’t get and the fact is I erred on the side of life and I will always err on the side of life as a governor as a president of the United States.” The woman Rick Perry mentioned in the Republican debate Thursday was Heather Burcham, a thirty one year old woman dying from cervical cancer. But what Perry left out in his answer was that he met her after he issued his executive order. http://abcn.ws/oELbrJ
Romney Book Changed to Remove Line About National Health Reform: ABC’s Emily Friedman reports: After the Republican presidential debate Thursday night, a senior advisor to Mitt Romney acknowledged that a line about spreading health care reform throughout the country was changed in the paperback version of Romney’s book “No Apology.” During the debate Romney denied that his book had been changed. “I actually — I actually wrote my book, and in my book I said no such thing. What I said — actually, when I put my health care plan together — and I met with Dan Balz, for instance, of The Washington Post. He said, is this a plan that if you were president you would put on the nation, have the whole nation adopt it? I said, absolutely not. I said, this is a state plan for a state, it is not a national plan. But after the debate Romney’s staffer [Eric] Fehrnstrom said that line was indeed removed because there was more information. “Every time a book goes from hardcover to paperback there are updates that are made,” Fehrnstrom said. “When Mitt Romney wrote his book “No Apology” it came out before the health reform law passed and the stimulus bill passed came so of course there were updates a year later when the paperback edition came out. That’s not unusual in the publishing industry.” http://abcn.ws/qM4PE6
IN THE NOTE’S INBOX:
–Santorum Emerges and Proves He Can Answer the “3 AM Phone Call”
– GARY JOHNSON SETS HIMSELF APART IN THE PRESIDENTIAL FIELD
–Cain Wins FOX News/ Google Debate
–Bachmann Brings Voice of American Voters to GOP Debate
–Huntsman Continues To Build Momentum in GOP Debate
JUST LIKE COLLEGE, Walter Shapiro extends the classroom metaphor in his debate analysis for The New Republic: “Romney, the ultimate wind-up candidate, had no problem acing his rehearsals, rarely faltering in delivering his well-practiced putdowns. … Sometimes, though, Romney’s over-preparation was so thorough that it deprived him of even a glimmer of spontaneity. … Perry’s problem on a debate stage appears to be the same one that bedeviled him as a student at Texas A & M–not always doing his coursework. Repeatedly, Perry’s on-message responses started strong and then petered out as if the candidate was desperately trying to remember those parts of the briefing book he merely skimmed.” http://bit.ly/o3x9yF
ON TODAY’S “TOP LINE.” ABC’s Rick Klein and Jonathan Karl talk to Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif. Also on the program, a clip of Karl’s “Subway Series” interview with Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn. (preview below). Watch “Top Line” LIVE at 12:00 p.m. Eastern. http://abcn.ws/toplineliveabc
“SUBWAY SERIES” PREVIEW: Lamar Alexander Tells Mitt Romney To ‘Stick to Your Guns’ On Massachusetts Health Care Law: Although Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney has been criticized by fellow republicans for the controversial health care law he enacted as Governor of Massachusetts, one senior U.S. Senator has some unorthodox advice for him: “stick to your guns.” Senator Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., tells ABC News he thinks Romney should not only vigorously defend the health care law he signed as governor, but also resist the recommendations from fellow republican heavy hitters like Tea Party kingmaker Senator Jim DeMint, R-SC, to admit he made a mistake. “I wouldn’t do it,” Alexander said during an interview on ABC News’ Subway Series with Jonathan Karl. ”I would think less of him if he did that.” (h/t ABC’s Gregory C. Simmons) http://abcn.ws/oJoSkS
THIS WEEK ON “THIS WEEK.” As President Obama tries to make the case for his jobs plan, is there any way he can bridge the gap with Republicans on his calls for new infrastructure spending and taxing the rich? ABC’s Christiane Amanpour talks with Senior White House Advisor David Plouffe about the battle to sell the president’s economic plans. http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/
WHITE HOUSE WATCH: ABC’s Mary Bruce previews President Obama’s day: The president will turn his focus today to education, offering a waiver from the central requirements of “No Child Left Behind” to states that adopt his education agenda. “To help states, districts and schools that are ready to move forward with education reform, our administration will provide flexibility from the law in exchange for a real commitment to undertake change,” Obama said in a statement Thursday. The president will effectively end the accountability measures in the Bush-era education law and allow states to opt out of its 2014 deadline to prove students are proficient in math and reading. In exchange, states must prove they have adopted certain reforms that the White House deems necessary, including adopting “college and career-ready” academic standards and linking teacher evaluations to student performance.
THE BUZZ
MATTHEW DOWD’S BIG PREDICTION. “On Thursday, the world’s dominant search engine, Google, co-sponsored a debate for: a party in search of a leader to take on currently very vulnerable incumbent president; nine candidates in search of a message that will resonate with potential Republican voters and carry them to victory, and, last but not least, Americans in search of a leader who can give us a vision of hope and confidence and optimism to succeed in this 21st century. … I have this gut feeling that we aren’t looking right now at who will be inaugurated president in January 2013. I don’t know if another Democrat gets in to challenge President Obama, another Republican, or an Independent candidate surfaces, but it seems to be we aren’t looking at our next president yet. Just a thought and suspicion in this time of great change and tremendous need for a different kind of leader.” More of Dowd’s key takeaways from last night’s debate: http://abcn.ws/r7VPnm
REPUBLICAN REDO: HOUSE PASSES TEMPORARY SPENDING BILL. “On the second attempt in two days (and part an early morning), the House of Representatives narrowly passed the GOP’s continuing resolution just before 1:00 a.m. Friday morning after the Republican leadership was able to swing half of the Republican ‘nay’ votes to their favor by adding an amendment to strip $100 million from a federal loan program that funded the bankrupt Solyndra,” ABC’s Kevin Dolak reports. “The razor thin vote was called by Rep. Charlie Bass at 12:49 a.m., passing 219-203, with 12 members not voting. Six Democrats joined 213 Republicans in supporting the measure. On Wednesday evening, 48 Republicans, including 20 freshmen, voted with Democrats to bring down the vote on its first attempt. But this time, about half of those Republicans voted back with the bulk of their party in favor of the bill. The new offset would cut the remaining funds from the same government loan program that granted a $535 million loan guarantee to the now-bankrupt Solyndra solar company. The bill now heads across the Capitol to the Senate, where Majority Leader Harry Reid says the bill will die a quick death Friday.” http://abcn.ws/rat0XT
U.S. GOVERNMENT: PAYING THE DEAD. “The federal government pays out millions of dollars to dead people each year — including deceased retired federal workers, according to a new report,” the Washington Post’s Ed O’Keefe reports. “In the past five years, the Office of Personnel Management has made more than $601 million in benefits payments to deceased federal annuitants, according to the agency’s inspector general. Total annual payouts range between $100 million and $150 million. Inspector General Patrick E. McFarland, who previously reported on the improper payments in 2005 and 2008, urged OPM to more closely track such mistakes. ‘It is time to stop, once and for all, this waste of taxpayer money,’ he wrote in the report. Improper payments to dead retirees increased 70 percent in the past five years, far higher than the 19 percent climb in overall annuity payments, the report said. The payments are on the rise because OPM is doing a poor job of tracking potential cheats, McFarland said. In one case, a deceased annuitant’s son continued receiving federal benefits until 2008 — 37 years after his father’s death. OPM learned about the improper payments — which exceeded $515,000 — only after the son died. The agency never recovered the money.” http://wapo.st/pekApM
WHO’S WINNING THE JEWISH VOTE? “American Jews have long proved a solid voting bloc for the Democratic Party, with about four out of five voting for President Obama in 2008, according to exit polls. Jewish voters are driven by a broad range of concerns, but for some the security of Israel is dominant. Now, with the peace process in the Middle East at a stalemate and Palestinians taking their case for statehood directly to the United Nations, Republicans are stepping up their efforts to peel off Jewish voters,” The New York Times’ Laurie Goodstein notes. “While this constituency is clearly in play, a new Gallup poll shows that Jews are no more disillusioned than other Americans are with Mr. Obama. According to the poll, his Jewish support has declined since the election in 2008 — but at a rate no different from that of Americans as a whole. Even with that drop-off, 54 percent of Jewish voters told Gallup in August and September that they approved of the job the president was doing (compared with 41 percent of American voters over all). In fact, Jews continue to be far more enthusiastic about Mr. Obama than other Americans — a 13-point difference that has remained sizable throughout the president’s term.” http://nyti.ms/pzOnTd
WHO’S TWEETING?
@pfeiffer44: Jacob Weisberg of Slate tells the world all they need to know about Ron Suskind and his new book slate.com/id/2304228/
@dickstevenson: “There are a lot of reasons not to elect me.” That line is guaranteed to be in an anti-Romney ad very, very soon. #gopdebate
@mkhammer: Wanted to say also, I think @TheHermanCain and Santorum gained some donors tonight.
@RealClearScott: Palin camp thinks they can put together operation in a couple weeks. Has the ship already sailed? bit.ly/nclgAa
@timkmak: Two days after repeal of DADT, Obama admin opposes giving full severance to service members dismissed on the rulepoliti.co/n2gmav
POLITICAL RADAR:
(all times local)
* All of the major Republican presidential candidates speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Orlando, Florida throughout the day.
The Note Futures Calendar: http://abcn.ws/ZI9gV
* Get The Note delivered to your inbox every day.
* For breaking political news and analysis check out The Note blog: http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/and ABCNews.com/Politics: http://abcnews.com/politics

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
ATT poll is showing Ron Paul won at 32% of the votes. Romney second at 26%. Perry third at 15%. Cain fourth at 8%. Personally I like Ron Paul followed by Herman Cain. Perry, Bachmann and Gingrich let their religion get in the way. Gingrich is an idiot. Romney is anti-gun The rest may as well not be there. Cain knows a lot about business and has some good ideas about the economy. Paul knows a lot about everything. I don’t agree with any of them on every issue but I’d like to see a Paul/Cain ticket. So far, those two are looking the best.
Posted by: oonogil | September 23, 2011, 9:58 am 9:58 am
There 2 people I would eliminate from the running, as an independent………..Santorum, because he is entirely negative, and antagonistic, in an angry way, and Romney, who I see as nothing but a Democrat, with a GOP label, who will do many of the same destructive things to the economy, as the Democrats do.
I could see myself voting for any of the others……..and if all the debates are considered, the one who shines the most, is actually Gingrich, but he does have skeletons in the closet, from his days as speaker.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 23, 2011, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Finally!! It’s good to see that at least a COUPLE of people in the Republican party have a clue. Romney is their BEST bet and the ONLY person in that crowd of CLOWNS that can possibly give President Obama a run for the votes! Perry’s stupidity is beginning to shine throught as I KNEW it would!
Posted by: demnme | September 23, 2011, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Way to go, Rick McDaniel. Romney is by far the most electable, and if the Tea Party is serious about taking the White House in 2012, it will support him when the time comes.
Posted by: Barbara | September 23, 2011, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Perry claims to be tough on closing our border with fences and boots on the ground; but, he says, just in case some illegals get through, he’s going to give their childen free educations at U of T…..Now what’s wrong with this logic?
Posted by: munster42 | September 23, 2011, 11:16 am 11:16 am
“Romney Book Changed to Remove Line About National Health Reform”
From Romney’s book, “No Apology”, the line about Romney Care being removed from all future publications is…“We can accomplish the same thing for everyone in the country.”
LOL! ….. “OK now Republican minions, please pull out your bottle of ‘white out’ out and turn to page…”
Posted by: Georgie_Bushie | September 23, 2011, 11:18 am 11:18 am
“Barbara”…LOL…I realize that you won’t agree with me on this…but as a ‘determined supporter of the President’ I just hope that people like ‘Rick McDaniel’ keep running off the head in their ‘extremist idea’ fashion. Because no educated, intelligent moderate or independent wants to associate their vote with those that ‘think like they do’. This looks good on the GOP…for ever pandering to that type of mentality in the first place.
Posted by: CND FOX | September 23, 2011, 11:43 am 11:43 am
After Bush’s administration nearly sent us into a depression, Perry is Bush part II, considering fmr pres. Bush had a better track record than Perry in Texas, could one imagine putting gov. Perry in the white house, disaster. As for Romney being a democrat labeled GOP, well goes to show how radical right the poster is. As for the comment of Perry in regards to Romney-Obama Light, well I don’t want Bush extra strength in the white house.
Posted by: phantomniter | September 23, 2011, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Phantomniter
Romney is just like Kennedy. Both are from Massachusetts so Romney must be Kenndy on steriods, booze, multiple girl friends and all. I don’t think Romney’s dad was a Nazi supporter like old man Kennedy but he’s from Mass so he must be.
After all, if two politicians are from the same state, they must be exactly alike, you know, like Bush and Perry. They’re both Texans and everyone is identical to everyone else in their state.
I know you noticed the sarcasm.
Posted by: oonogil | September 23, 2011, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Gingrich once said that the First Amendment guarantees the right of every American to practice his Christian religion in public. Proving that he knows almost as much about the Bill of Rights as Palin does about history. Take the evangalical support from Perry, Gingrich and Bachman and they’ll fall on their backsides.
Romney and Cain understand the Second Amendment about as well as Gingrich understands the First. Paul is probably too old to do the job.
Sadly, any of the above would be better than what we have.
Posted by: oonogil | September 23, 2011, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
OONIGIL: Yeah stumbling of words and calling SS a ponzi scheme, a.k.a. privatize the funds, D student vs C student from Yale, very much a like.
Posted by: phantomniter | September 23, 2011, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
President Obama is a well educated (Harvard Law Review), street smart, reasonable, cool under fire, patriotic man. The only president close was Bill Clinton, a Rhodes Scholar. Is this intellectual snobbishness or elitism? You bet your ___ it is.
I’ll take the presidents resume over any of those so-called presidential candidates on that stage last night. It was dummies that got us into this mess and I’m sure as hell not voting for anymore dummies to get us out of it.
Posted by: tferretti | September 23, 2011, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
So, you want to compare brain pans between Obama and one of the other GOP candidates. I think that is a great idea. Let set see. Obama, as you stated was editor of the Harvard Review. Romney was class Valedictorian at BYU where he earned his udergrad degree. The was also done during a time where he tood 2 years off with no pay in order to serve a mission for his church in Paris France which is why he speaks fluent french. He then did go onto Harvard Uneversity were he recieved a dual doctorate in both law and in business at the same time. and graduated in the top 5% of his class in both. Romney in nst just msat. He is a genius. We are foolish ot to dismisss him as anything less.
Posted by: Rhino40 | September 23, 2011, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Maybe Obama is a well educated person but his records does not reflect what the left wing nut jobs vomiting. On the contrary, we end up with the blame game for Tsunami, Irene Huricane, race card, and the dated Bush’s fault.
It’s not the education makes the person worthy, it’s his accomplishment and his leadership. Irresponsible, unaccountable and dishonest are the three prominent character of a lead-from-behind Obama\s style.
Posted by: acd2012 | September 24, 2011, 2:14 am 2:14 am
Well it’s no wonder Romney does well in these debates. He’s got the most practice BY FAR of anyone in the field. He’s about the closest thing there is to a professional debater. In fact I’d even go so far as to say he’s a Master Debater………
Posted by: Searambler | September 24, 2011, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Rhino wrote, about Romney, “…That was also done during a time where he took 2 years off with no pay in order to serve a mission for his church in Paris France which is why he speaks fluent French.”
Two years off “without pay” is easy to do when your daddy is rich. And Paris, France sure is rough duty for a wealthy young man…………….
Posted by: Searambler | September 24, 2011, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
So, you want to compare brain pans between Obama and one of the other GOP candidates. I think that is a great idea. Posted by: Rhino40 | September 23, 2011, 11:30 pm
LOL! I love how you picked Romney, but skipped over Perry, Bachmann, Santorum, and the rest of the field………………..
Posted by: Searambler | September 24, 2011, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Romney is by far the most electable, and if the Tea Party is serious about taking the White House in 2012, it will support him when the time comes. Posted by: Barbara | September 23, 2011, 11:11 am
The Tea Baggers kinda hate Romney. Besides the fact that he’s a Mormon, and the Tea Baggers are overwhelmingly evangelical fundamentalists, Romney has been on BOTH sides of virtually every important issue over the last 25 years. Perry tried to beat him up over his flip-flopping during the debate, but mangled it so badly that it actually made Perry look even worse. But the fact remains that Romney was for abortion before he was against it, he was for cap-and-trade before he was against it, he was for the Individual Mandate before he was against it, etc etc etc. He’s changed his mind on the issues more times than ‘Law and Order’ has spun off a new series……………..
Posted by: Searambler | September 24, 2011, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
@searambler: regarding Romney’s time in France. Yes, it was tough, he left school, and the women he loved and would later marry for 2 1/2 years in order to preach to people in Paris that giving up wine and women is a good idea. So yes, I would say that is very tough.
As to glossing over the other candidates on the brain pan issue. No mystery there, Romney is the smartest one. Though Huntsman is running a close second and obviously Newt, Ron Paul and Herman Cain are all smarter than Obama. I do think Bachman and Perry are idiots but thats just me.
PS> my apologies for the gross spelling errors of my previous post. I just returned from a 240 mile bike ride to raise money for charity and I was exausted and just trying to unwind.
Posted by: Rhino40 | September 24, 2011, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Romney of the Mitt & Rick Comedy Show series is just an empty suit. He sure loves to hear himself talk…and talk….and talk. Zzzzzzzzzzzz
Support and vote Ron Paul 2012! He is honest, sincere, consistent, not about power or money, but for America and Americans first.
Posted by: not2bad | October 3, 2011, 8:42 am 8:42 am
check out the “obama deception” on line. it has a piece init stating how the elitists have chosen the candidates for presidents for years. obummer is one of them. i’ve read a bit on how romney and perry is also involved with them too. we need some thing different than what we’ve had before its too late.
Posted by: don | October 6, 2011, 7:00 am 7:00 am
Why doesn’t the media EVER report on Romney’s success stories as an economic turnaround artist?? He has practically performed miracles, and I have yet to hear one word about his past accomplishments! Like when the USA almost lost the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City. The organizing committee got caught on bribery charges, corruption, mismanagement of money, etc. etc. and the games were on the brink of bankruptcy & being moved elsewhere. The president of the committee was fired, and they asked Mitt Romney to take the position, as they knew it was going to be a monstrous challenge, but he had rescued failing organizations before. He took it on and then we had 9/11 which made the committee have to come up with an extra $300,000,000 for security! Romney re-organized the leadership, reduced budgets, and boosted fund raising, etc. He regained the corporate sponsors who were about to back out and recruited new ones. I remember him becoming like a Rock Star in Salt Lake area! When all was said and done, it was a huge success & Romney ended up making a profit of $100 million for the games. Romney broke the record for most private money raised by any individual for ANY Olympics games, summer or winter. It was a big “rags to riches” story & it was a huge relief for Salt Lake as they had invested MILLIONS in building venues for different sports, and all the other preparations. They even built that HUGE Arena that they used afterwards for the Utah Jazz. Romney got some kind of commendation from President Bush. It was a BIG DEAL at the time….Harvard Business School even taught a case study based around Romney’s techniques for turning things around! But what really impressed me, was that Romney was paid a $1.5 million salary for his three years as president and CEO of the Olympics and he DONATED EVERY DOLLAR TO CHARITY. Of course, he was a multi-millionaire already, but he earned it honestly. To me, he is someone who actually does what he says, and isn’t all talk. Plus his wife has Multiple Sclerosis, like my mom had & he treats her like a queen, and my dad left us! Anyway, why the silence in the media?? Maybe it’s just me, but I have yet to hear one word about this stuff in his past. He has the talent for seeing what’s wrong and fixing it! DUH..Kind of like EXACTLY WHAT WE NEED RIGHT NOW!!
Posted by: Bj Jones | October 7, 2011, 6:24 am 6:24 am