Ron Paul Calls Rick Perry ‘Candidate of the Week’
Republican presidential contender Rep. Ron Paul had some tough words for his Republican opponent Texas Governor Rick Perry, calling him “candidate of the week” and said his poll numbers would fall once voters get to know him better.
“He was the one saying, ‘Oh yeah, I’m all for secession,’ and that kind of talk,” Paul told the Associated Press referring to a 2009 interview in which Perry said there was no reason for Texas to secede from the union, but suggested it was a possibility if Washington political leaders continued to “thumb their nose at the American people.”
“The only thing I would advise is looking into him, looking at his record, and not just taking him at face value. Texas has had a lot of changes in these last eight years, not exactly positive either,” Paul said.
Up until now, Paul had taken a very dismissive approach to Perry, telling a crowd in Fairfield, Iowa in August that Perry would be beneficial to Paul’s campaign.
“He appeals to the status quo, and we don’t represent the status quo. He will dilute the status quo, and he will enhance our campaign,” Paul said.
Paul also dismissed speculation he would abandon his Republican candidacy for another party. When asked directly by the AP whether he had ruled out a third-party bid, Paul said, “Essentially I have.”
“The reason I rule it out, the easiest way, and this is disgusting, because we don’t have a very good Democratic process here. … The Republicans and Democrats write the laws, so they make it very hard to get on the ballot,” Paul said.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
“Candidate of the week” were the AP’s language, not Ron Paul’s and shouldn’t be in quotation marks. Ron Paul said that they should look back at poll numbers after Perry had been vetted and that a number of candidates had shot to the top of the polls only to fall nearly as spectacularly.
Where is Trump, these days?
Posted by: KJ | September 3, 2011, 10:21 am 10:21 am
And so it begins, the eating of their own. Too bad Paul is so smart. If he were a bit dumber he would have more support among the rank-and-file Teapublicans……..
Posted by: Searambler | September 3, 2011, 10:51 am 10:51 am
KJ, Trump dropped out ages ago. I’M wondering where Newt is today? HE still is a declared candidate, and I’m sure he’s still raising campaign cash. Maybe he went on another spending spree at Tiffany’s…..?
Posted by: Searambler | September 3, 2011, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Funny how people like to pick on Newt. He and his congress are the only congress that gave Clinton those projected surpluses we hear about from democrats. Yet, do they recognize Newt for it? Nope, they think Clinton did it all by himself. LOL!
Posted by: kate | September 3, 2011, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Perry is an empty suit… President Obama balanced the Texas state budget and created jobs in Texas not Governor Perry… How could that be? 14.4 B dollars from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act; sometimes referred as wasteful Federal spending by Republicans depending in what spin cycle they are in. More than a third of the $787 billion was earmarked for tax cuts and incentives for individuals and businesses on the behalf of Texans. Texans are grateful to President Obama not Governor Perry.
Posted by: threeriverscrossing | September 3, 2011, 11:16 am 11:16 am
As the election campaigning continues, more and more Americans will see the absolute quality of Ron Paul’s ideas, character, honesty, and proven voting record. The campaign themes we hear reiterated by Perry, Romney, Bachman, Huntsman, and the other Republican candidates originated with Ron Paul. He has been consistently telling us about these issues for years, only now our economy and the American public has caught up with him.
Ron Paul is honest, direct, and in depth on ALL the issues. He is supported in the polls because he is truthful, and his thinking and ideas are grounded on sound principles, the U.S. Constitution. With 22 years’ experience in Congress, he is a very wise leader with VERY doable and specific plans to heal our nation, a true Statesman.
Ron Paul is a gem. He CAN win. He has my vote!
RON PAUL for PRESIDENT 2012!
Posted by: Whiteowlstwo | September 3, 2011, 11:20 am 11:20 am
I hope Whiteowlstwo is correct. But, I doubt. Even more predictible than crooked pols are apethetic voters. The folks who post on boards like this (left or right makes no difference) are in a clear minority because we care enough to form an opinion based on more than MSM-TV-TIME.
BTW I am not bashing the anti-pauls either, so long as they are able to at least articulate an argument that supports thier opinions.
But, anyway, since the majority goes for the Media annointed, Paul has a very outside chance at best. That sux.
Since we (those that care one way or the other) are in an obvious minority; Can we get some special privelege?
Posted by: Mr Phil | September 3, 2011, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Ron Paul has been running for the last 20 years! What does that make him?
Posted by: phdinprogress | September 3, 2011, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Rick Perry was the presidential campaign manager for non other than AL GORE. This is why Rick Perry will fall in the polls once voters get to know the truth.
Posted by: informed | September 3, 2011, 11:46 am 11:46 am
MR PHIL:
Ron Paul can win. The grassroots movement for electing Ron Paul President is exponentially swelling. He is the ONLY honest candidate.
Ron Paul has the highest number of campaign contributions coming from the military of ALL the candidates combined with Obama. The military men and women know he will bring them home and not just say this as the other politicians have been saying for years.
See Judy Woodruff interview with Ron Paul on PBS. He answers tough questioning with in-depth answers to major issues.
Posted by: Whiteowlstwo | September 3, 2011, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Well – I agree with Paul – this is his run, this run for the Repub. nomination, so support that, or don’t, but this is the run.
There is no point in running a second time on a 3rd party ticket, because we don’t have good democratic processes and it would simply give the impression of diluted support because the laws make it rather difficult to get on the ballot and be a choice.
Americans don’t believe in choice, beyond two choices.
Posted by: Robert D | September 3, 2011, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Ron Paul is a nut job but he seems to be aware of it. What makes Bachmann different from him is she is delusional enough to believe she might actually become president. Ron Paul knows he hasn’t got a chance. He also makes sense at times. Bachmann never makes sense and rattles on nonsensically while she stares off into the distance as if imagining she’s pushing the nuclear button in the Oval Office, blowing all the sinners to smithereens and ridding the planet of gays.
Posted by: zenithofSanFran | September 3, 2011, 11:50 am 11:50 am
To: phdinprogress
Fact: Ron Paul has been in Congress for 22 years. He also served in the military as a flight surgeon.
Posted by: Whiteowlstwo | September 3, 2011, 11:53 am 11:53 am
puff polls used to hard-sell the establishment puppet
Neocons force the public to vote for more corruption
Posted by: nader paul kucinich gravel mckinney | September 3, 2011, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Amusing. Ron Paul is the candidate that has mostly been an also-ran!
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | September 3, 2011, 11:56 am 11:56 am
To: Zenith of Sanfran
The left and right media and the Republican Party seem to want American voters to look through and past Ron Paul to the other candidates. They appear to be trying to get the American voters to ignore him and dismiss him, though Ron Paul is well supported in the polls ahead of many candidates being promoted.
Listen to Ron Paul speak. Look at his record, his experience, his character. His ideas are realistic, specific, and doable, and have been very influential with regards to contemporary conservative and independent thought. He doesn’t speak in sound bites, talking points. He is authentic and his voting record proves it.
Posted by: Whiteowlstwo | September 3, 2011, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Thank you Kate for pointing out it’s the Congress that produces legislation and passes it on the President, not the other way around. The media needs to take some responsibility for framing the conversation in such a way we get a stalemate. We need equal pressure on the House, Senate and the President.
Posted by: focusonjobs1 | September 3, 2011, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Someone should tell Rep. Ron Paul that he was the candidate of yesteryear!
Posted by: Voice_Reason | September 3, 2011, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Ron Paul is in my mind the most important candidate in the Republican Party and Philosophically speaking may be the Most important Candidate since Ronald Reagan. He represents at last a conservativism that is actually realistic and potent. He represents freedom in ways far different from Republicans before him…..Yes some of what he says is may sound extreme, but only because we are at this point in time so far removed from the optimal world he alludes to as his model. For example the Fema episode of a few days ago…well What Dr. Paul really means is that each state would be better off paying for the amount of aid it will usually need…in essence each state should pay for its own Federal insurance instead of having a huge structure like Fema burning all this cash with very doubtful outcomes….again the level of phiilosophical maturity which he represents is sometimes difficult to understand because it is so distant from our present sorry state of affairs and this sometimes makes this philosophy sound a little extreme, but it really is not. In effect he wants us to take responsibility for our own freedom and wants the United states to move in that direction…..HE IS ALSO AGAINST THESE COSTLY WARS…..AND THIS IRKS THE RULING ELITE WHO ARE VERY MUCH IN FAVOR OF CONTINUING THESE WARS EVEN IF THE UNITED STATES IS GOING BROKE TO NO GOOD END DOING SO. Thus Dr. Paul has earned himself an enemy amongst many in the Media….As for Perry…please this man is little more than another George Bush….are you people kidding? DO YOU WANT AN EXPANSION OF THESE WARS? ALONG WITH THEIR COSTS? THEN YOU SHOULD THINK OF PERRY AND BACHMAN BECAUSE THATS WHAT THEY ARE ABOUT AND THAT’S WHY THE MEDIA SUPPORTS THEM…..IF YOU WANT THE WARS TO END AND THIS NATION TO GET BACK TO TAKING CARE OF ITSELF….DR PAUL MAY WELL BE YOUR ONLY OPTION…NO ONE ELSE IS TALKING ON THE SAME LEVEL OF SOBRIETY AS DR PAUL IS NOW DOING…I wish the Media would just let him get his word out…it is very very important.
Posted by: captain Howdy Doody | September 3, 2011, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
ATTENTION ALL VOTERS! Republicans seek to suppress voting by targeted groups. The POLL TAX, a Reconstruction era tool, abolished by the Voting Rights Act of 1965, is being revived on the local and state levels by the GOP in over 40 states. The U.S. Supreme Court held in Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966), that a poll tax is unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. Government-issued IDs are not free. The requirement for these IDs forces citizens to buy for the sole purpose of voting and constitutes a POLL TAX. Citizens either must PAY TO VOTE, or face suppression of their voting rights. This Tea Party-backed agenda is dutifully being pushed by the GOP. Minorities, the disabled, the unemployed, the elderly, and young people are targets of this “new” GOP political scheme-. It is called the Jim Crow (oops!) . . . Jim DeMint Voter Suppression Project.
Posted by: I-Vote | September 3, 2011, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Aren’t there any SANE republicans interested in running? Are there any sane republicans? Just asking. It seems like a moderate republican with no ties to the TP would have a good shot at the WH if s/he could get funding.
Posted by: htgriff | September 3, 2011, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
The candidates of Yesteryear speak in sound bites and double speak. The candidates of Yesteryear are clones of one another, different faces with the same policy when in office. A Prophet is not a candidate of Yesteryear but of the Future. Let us pray, that the candidates of the future will be more like Ron Paul. Ron Paul actually says something when he speaks, defends the Constitution he swore to uphold, accurately and in detail predicted the The Housing Bubble, The Economic Bubble, the Blow Back trap of Foreign Intervention, the pattern of supporting then attacking puppet dictators, the steady erosion of Liberty of a Keynsian Economics Welfare/Warfare State. May all candidates of the Future emulate Ron Paul. RON PAUL 2012!
Posted by: Blaseboniface | September 3, 2011, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Sarah Palin should run—run away from public view, that is. This lady is a public nuisance. It’s about time she goes away.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | September 4, 2011, 3:06 am 3:06 am
Ron Paul knows the constitution, Money and living within ones means just for starters. If there is an American citizen who does not like what Ron Paul stands for then let the others win for another 5 years and see how bad things in the USA can get. Bottom line is we are Bankrupt as a Nation and we need a strong leader to reel us back into Reality. No More Status Quo. Ron Paul 2012.
Posted by: RonPaulWillWin | September 4, 2011, 8:01 am 8:01 am
I’m 51, voted Republican all my life. I became fed up with the Republican party under the 2nd term of W Bush.
I thought the republicans were the party of fiscal responsibility, and small government.
Instead W. grew the deficit. I started to pay more attention to what was going on, and then I heard Ron Paul on YouTube.
Finally here was someone that spoke to my values;
smaller federal government, lets close some of those departments that are redundant.
states rights, the power is supposed to rest in the people’s and states hands.
fiscal responsibility, stop the bailouts and stimulus! Have a balanced budget.
personal responsibility, the nanny state does not make a strong country, strong people do.
militarism, just as Bush spent too much, the Republicans have become a party of war. That is not productive, nor does it make safer.
sincerity, here was a guy that actually voted the way he spoke, and didn’t change his speech depending on who he was talking to.
Peace and Prosperity vs War and Deficits? What’s your choice?
Ron Paul 2012
Posted by: TimM | September 4, 2011, 8:24 am 8:24 am
I just saw a poll in the Houston Chronicle. (You can google it)
Ron Paul 73%
Rick Perry 9%
Texans know the truth!!!
Both Ron Paul and. Rick Perry are from Texas.
Posted by: krissy | September 4, 2011, 9:03 am 9:03 am
The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew. We must disenthrall ouselves. —Abraham Lincoln—
Disentrall–To free from a controlling force or influence.
RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT.
FAUX NEWS SUX.
DO YOUR RESEARCH.
LEARN THE TRUTH ABOUT YOUR COUNTRY AND THE CANDIDIATES.
AMERICANS WAKE UP BEFORE ITS TOO LATE.
Posted by: destiny | September 4, 2011, 9:07 am 9:07 am
Perry’s poll numbers are like a graph of the returns from Madoff Investments. They are hollow, largely contrived and soon to drop. Perry has done no extended interview yet, and participated in no national debates yet.
Posted by: Jay | September 4, 2011, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Ron Paul appears to be the most honest person running for that office today. He’s “telling it like it is”.
What other “runners” are as honest?
Posted by: yogiman | September 4, 2011, 10:32 am 10:32 am
My choices in the following order: Paul and Palin in 2012, or Paul and Bachmann in 2012, or Palin and Bachmann in 2012. Herman Cain is OK, too, and being dismissed by the lamebrain media. Clearly, though, Paul is the number 1 pick of those, who understand the importance of our Constitution and the free market. Not only does his worldview line up with many real Conservatives and Libertarians, but his character is above reproach, and his record consistently matches his stated beliefs (Gosh, someone who says what he means and means what he says). As other astute folks have pointed out here, he is boldly honest and to the point, which is more than can be said of many of the usual candidates, who are favored by the establishment. If Ron Paul is a “nut,” so, too, were the Founders of this nation, who believed in liberty and the pursuit of happiness, which cannot be achieved by keeping the status quo of endless wars, bailout, giveaways, and parasitic and preying upon the productive elements within our nation. No nation can continue to exist and remain sovereign if it is the world’s policeman, Santa Claus, and baby sitter (anchor babies). If Ron Paul is a “nut,” let us pray that we have more “nuts” in great abundance. Moreover, I respectfully remind those detractors out there, who wrap their arms around the status quo, of the old saying about the definition of insanity as repeating the same thing over and over again and expecting different results, which is what those of conventional thinking in the political parties and media keep pushing. Free yourselves from the propaganda and the political matrix of democrap and repugnantcan doublethink, and support candidates with values consistent with the Constitution and individual freedom and rights. RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT IN 2012, AND MAY LIBERTY RING THROUGHOUT OUR LAND!
Posted by: Stark | September 4, 2011, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Truth is, Americans don’t want to vote using common sense.. They want to vote for whoever someone tells them to vote for. They don’t want to “read up” and learn about anything that is going on but they will loudly jeer if you go against their little “spoon fed” propaganda based viewpoint on life. We ARE sunk. I’m voting for Ron Paul anyway…
Posted by: George | September 4, 2011, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
I’d call Perry, that is Bush 3.0, candidate of the Weak! Go Ron Paul!
Posted by: john cummins | September 4, 2011, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Principled. Trustworthy. Educated. Consistent. Honorable. Noble. Truthful. Authentic. Steadfast. Credible. Accurate. Dependable. Honest. Sincere. Factual. Candid. Plainspoken. Reliable. Correct. Wise.
Ron Paul has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.
He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.
Ron Paul has voted this way for decades, when everyone else from BOTH political parties voted to expand our monstrous federal government, restrict our freedoms and liberties, take lobbyist money in exchange for political favors, engage in unconstitutional wars, and swamp us with trillions in debt.
Ron Paul sets the bar so high, it makes the other political candidates appear like children. No wonder why the political establishment does not like to even acknowledge him, since he makes them all look so bad in comparison. Ron Paul will serve the American People, not the special interests, not the military industrial complex, not big business wall street, and certainly not the political establishment. We need a president who will follow the Constitution and inspire other politicians to do the same; the only politician who has reliably shown he will follow the Constitution is Ron Paul. Ron Paul is the Champion of the Constitution. Think the constitution is outdated? It was made with the intention of securing individual freedom. Why is individual Freedom Important? Intellectual freedom is the basis of our democratic system. We expect our people to be self-governors. But to do so responsibly, our citizenry must be well informed. Libraries provide the ideas and information, in a variety of formats, to allow people to inform themselves but alas, I digress.
The jaws of power are always open to devour, and her arm is always stretched out, if possible, to destroy the freedom of thinking, speaking, and writing. – John Adams
Spread the message far and wide!
Posted by: johnnyten | September 4, 2011, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Rick Perry thinks he can smear Doctor Ron Paul,
just like he and Glenn Beck did to Debra Medina.
Posted by: NadePaulKuciGravMcKi | September 4, 2011, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
And so it begins, the eating of their own. Too bad Paul is so smart. If he were a bit dumber he would have more support among the rank-and-file Teapublicans…
by Searambler
______________________
When the demolition derby took place in 2008 between Obama and Hillary, it was said the Democrats were “eating their own”. And with unemployment at 9.1%, $4.00/gallon gas prices, and a 14 trillion dollar debt we can say that if Obama were any dumber, he’d have an IQ of 1.
Posted by: Spike | September 4, 2011, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Ron Paul would be a great 2012 presidential candidate! He is the only CONSISTENT and HONEST voice there!!
Posted by: dwcusc | September 4, 2011, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Ron Paul reminds me of many of the great leaders in americas past . He is the only candidate who consistently recieves praise from the commenters on these boards,
The only candidate who could stand beside Abraham Lincoln today. If its flash and theatrics america wants they should look to hollywood. In the business of overseeing the interests of our beloved country we should look to the somber and wise. Vote for Ron Paul.
Posted by: ruff karver | September 5, 2011, 7:53 am 7:53 am
What I dont comprehend is how youre not even a lot more popular than you might be now. Youre just so intelligent. You know so significantly about this topic, created me consider it from so many diverse angles. Its like men and women arent interested unless it has some thing to accomplish with Lady Gaga! Your stuffs great. Continue to keep it up!
Posted by: Daren Ivanov | September 7, 2011, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
The GOP is using Perry, and one of the ways they are using him is as a way to deflect attention from Ron Paul.
Posted by: bobo123 | September 8, 2011, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Rick Perry should change his name to Mike Huckabee.
They both ran so that Romney would lose support and to a lesser extent to draw focus off of Ron Paul.
He knows the general public would never vote for him, let alone Texas.
He is in this to get a media job like Huckabee at the expense of America.
Posted by: Jason | September 8, 2011, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Perry is a child next to Ron Paul. Big, dumb child. Ron Paul 2012!!!
Posted by: R. | September 9, 2011, 1:17 am 1:17 am
@Zethran,
You mean it’s a bad thing to rid the earth of gays and pedophiles?
Posted by: KS | September 11, 2011, 10:29 am 10:29 am