The President Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest
NEW YORK, NY — Speaking to the United Nations General Assembly Wednesday morning, President Obama tried to answer critics who suggest he helped pave the way towards the current diplomatic kerfuffle over the pending UN resolution that would – prematurely, in the president’s view – make Palestine a sovereign state and member of the UN.
The president cautioned United Nations members that peace will only come “if we can encourage the parties to sit down together, to listen to each other, and to understand each other’s hopes and fears. …And that is what the United Nations should be focused on in the weeks and months to come.”
The president made clear his opposition to the expected UN Security Council resolution. For weeks, American diplomats have been furiously lobbying the Palestinians to drop their bid, which the US has publicly stated it will veto.
Granting Palestine membership in the United Nations as a sovereign state before any peace treaty with Israel has been worked out, the US believes, could be a diplomatic hornet’s nest, with Israel all of a sudden occupying a sovereign nation, the Palestinians given access to the International Criminal Court and the Human Rights Council, and any future peace negotiations thrown into disarray.
The US also does not want to be put into the position of vetoing the resolution, which could inflame passions in the region and throughout the Arab and Muslim worlds.
Critics have suggested that the president raised hopes and expectations for a Palestinian state, putting Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in a situation where he felt he had to pursue this resolution to further the cause of a Palestinian state, given little progress.
The president, after all, hosted a big splashy September 1, 2010 White House photo op with Abbas, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, then-president of Egypt Hosni Mubarak, and King Abdullah of Jordan. He publicly pushed both sides – but most publicly Israel. He devoted time and resources towards the cause of Mideast peace, differentiating himself from previous Presidents who, his advisers noted, waited until the ends of their presidency to do so.
And in a quote that representatives from the Palestinian authority are quoting quite a bit this week, at last year’s speech President Obama said that if we “reach for what’s best within ourselves… when we come back here next year, we can have an agreement that will lead to a new member of the United Nations — an independent, sovereign state of Palestine, living in peace with Israel.”
President Obama acknowledged that moment today, saying that “one year ago, I stood at this podium and called for an independent Palestine. I believed then – and I believe now – that the Palestinian people deserve a state of their own. But what I also said is that genuine peace can only be realized between Israelis and Palestinians themselves. ”
The president acknowledged being “frustrated by the lack of progress,” but he argued the Palestinian statehood gambit would be a mistake.
“The question isn’t the goal we seek – the question is how to reach it,” he said. “And I am convinced that there is no short cut to the end of a conflict that has endured for decades. Peace will not come through statements and resolutions at the UN – if it were that easy, it would have been accomplished by now.”
Notably the president did not today renew his call for Israel to return to its 1967 borders with mutually agreed upon land swaps, a call he made in May that angered Israeli officials. Today Mr. Obama said that “ultimately, it is Israelis and Palestinians – not us – who must reach agreement on the issues that divide them: on borders and security; on refugees and Jerusalem.”
The president offered a detailed and passionate defense of Israel’s “very real security concerns,” invoking the Holocaust and noting that the Jewish state “is surrounded by neighbors that have waged repeated wars against it,” that its “citizens have been killed by rockets fired at their houses and suicide bombs on their buses” and that Israeli children “come of age knowing that throughout the region, other children are taught to hate them.”
“These are facts!” the president said, deviating a bit from his prepared text. “They cannot be denied.”
The president addressed the Israeli-Palestinian conflict after heralding successes in South Sudan, Tunisia, the Ivory Coast, Libya, and Egypt.
-Jake Tapper and Kirit Radia
Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
NYPost Oct 2008:
Jackson said that the most important change in the U.S. administration’s policy under Barack Obama would occur in the Middle East, where “decades of putting Israel’s interests first” – as Jackson is quoted – would end.
“Jackson believes that, although ‘Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades’ remain strong, they’ll lose a great deal of their clout when Barack Obama enters the White House,” the Post article continued. It is not clear from the report what part of Jackson’s comments was made before the World Policy Forum and what part was made in a conversation with Taheri.
Jackson said that while he isn’t a confidante or adviser of Obama’s, Obama has been “a neighbor or, better still, a member of the family.”
Posted by: wheresmymoney | September 21, 2011, 11:42 am 11:42 am
If the President cannot get the Palestinians to do what is best for regional peace by withdrawing “prematurely” making Palestine a sovereign state and member of the UN using logic how does he expect the Israelis do ant better?
Posted by: Common _ Sense | September 21, 2011, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Obama’s problems are many in this kerkuffle. He encouraged the boldness of the Palestinians and lost the respect of many Israelis here in America, look to the special election in NYC for proof. This speech was nothing more than an attempt to win their hearts back. He is clueless.
Posted by: J.R. | September 21, 2011, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Jake – from heritage – ASK THESE QUESTIONS – these are HUGE stories that reporter’s careers are built upon!!!! – “A cross-border gun-running scandal, deaths in the United States and Mexico, staff removals and resignations, secret audio recordings, complaints from foreign officials, hundreds of millions of dollars in loans, bankruptcy, an FBI raid, campaign donors, and allegations of inappropriate White House influence in congressional testimony. There are serious questions coming out of Washington. It’s time the media start demanding answers.”
Posted by: chris | September 21, 2011, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
It’s funny how reading polls and reviewing election results can change one’s perspective between trips to the UN podium, isn’t it, fellow Citizens of The World?
Posted by: Oliver Shagnasty | September 21, 2011, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
According to CNN, a clear majority of both Democrats and Independents want the US to recognize a Palestinian state. Once again, Obama’s inconsistency in backing down from his 2009 proposal of a Palestinian state will only hinder his re-election potential.
There’s far more to governing a country than appeasing the widest rage of interests. It’s as if Obama has a background in or preference to mediation law, which he has doggedly applied to his term.
Ultimately a president is answerable to his constituency rather than special interests; which in this case, are multiple and pervasive.
Posted by: jane r. | September 21, 2011, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Is this guy on Medications? he is so inconsistent
Posted by: Tax me more | September 21, 2011, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
“a clear majority of both Democrats and Independents want the US to recognize a Palestinian state.”
Not true, only 45% of Indenpendents in the polls support such a plan, while 55% either say no and don’t know. That’s not a clear majority. I also question the make-up of the sample they used especially since it’s not listed.
“Ultimately a president is answerable to his constituency rather than special interests”
I’m curious, did you apply that same logic while Obama and the Dems were ramming through Obamacare against the wishes of his constituency?
Posted by: J.R. | September 21, 2011, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Oh I wish President Obama was having the ringing success George W. Bush had on the issue during his 8 years.
Posted by: Pat | September 21, 2011, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
The Palestinians will never have a nation of their own as long as the USA and its Client State Israel hold the whip hand at the UN. The UK Govt should recognise Palestine and encourage Israel to 1) return to its 1948 borders and 2) allow the ‘right of return’ to those whose land was stolen or 3) Compensate the latter – only if this is done will the two peoples be able to live in peace.
And wasnt it a UN resolution that created the current settler state of israel to begin with. Why didn’t anyone veto them.
Posted by: Justice | September 21, 2011, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
I would hate to depend on Obama to be my friend and back me up. Peace is hard, no…what a profound statement.
Posted by: Freedom | September 21, 2011, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
“And wasnt it a UN resolution that created the current settler state of israel to begin with. Why didn’t anyone veto them.”
Perhaps because they weren’t going to be run by terrorist organizations?
Posted by: J.R. | September 21, 2011, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
I would hate to depend on Obama to be my friend and back me up. Peace is hard, no…what a profound statement.
Posted by: Freedom | September 21, 2011, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Ask George W. Bush. He had 8 years to move things along – nothing.
Posted by: Terry | September 21, 2011, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Ask George W. Bush. He had 8 years to move things along – nothing.
Posted by: Terry | September 21, 2011, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
************************************************
Ask Bill Clinton. Ask George H.W. Bush. Ask Jimmy Carter. While you’re asking, ask them if they got up at the UN and made a speech claiming that success in solving it was possible within a year simply because they had been elected.
This has been yet another UNPRECEDENTED aspect of the Obama presidency.
Posted by: Oliver Shagnasty | September 21, 2011, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
The Bible makes it clear that peace will eventually come to the Middle East. Of course, the rapture will have occurred and only the unsaved will be left behind. But peace will come to that region. Guaranteed.
Posted by: s | September 21, 2011, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
“Not true, only 45% of Indenpendents in the polls support such a plan, while 55% either say no and don’t know”
FYI. 45% yes to a 28% no is significant in the Pew poll. There IS a clear majority among BOTH Independents and Democrats in favor of the Palestinian state.
The present CNN poll has 81% of its respondents in favor of statehood for Palestine. Sorry, but public awareness and opinion differ from your own.
Posted by: jane r. | September 21, 2011, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Jake, Jake ,Jake – your training in Russia missed a small detail .It’s kick an “ant bed” son .Who could kick a hornets nest -they are constructed in elevated places …like trees ? Really.
Posted by: GrooveAnew | September 23, 2011, 1:58 am 1:58 am
I find it interesting that the politicians, the press, and the public all seem to assume that we have some kind of God-given authority over another nation’s bid for sovereignty. Amazing arrogance – and the rest of the world appears to see this little blind spot of ours.
Posted by: Karen S. | September 24, 2011, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm