Oct 12, 2011 11:27am

Americans Elect Aims to Bypass Parties With Online Presidential Nomination

For the 68 percent of Americans who said in an ABC/Washington Post poll released Wednesday  that they had a negative view of government, the possibility of having a presidential candidate free of the currently gridlocked political parties could be just a few clicks away.

The nonpartisan, nonprofit  Americans Elect has collected petition signatures – millions of them – in all 50 states to put a “candidate of the people” on the ballot in November 2012. This candidate would be selected through an online draft and nomination process  instead of through the traditional Republican and Democratic parties primary and caucus schedule.

“We are creating competition for all these folks who are politically homeless,” said Elliot Ackerman, Americans Elect’s chief operating officer. “A lot of the folks that engage with us are socially liberal and fiscally conservative, and those people don’t really have a voice in our political system right now. What we’re doing is really creating an incentive structure so that those individuals will be competed for.”

So far, the group has secured a spot on the ballot in six states, has collected the required number of signatures in four states and has about half the necessary signatures in four other states. Americans Elect spokeswoman Ileana Wachtel said the group  would  begin the petition process in seven more states within the week.

In California, organizers collected and submitted 1.6 million signatures last week, more than have been collected for any one initiative in the state’s history. California has until Nov. 2 to verify those signatures and grant or deny Americans Elect a third-party spot on the ballot.

Ackerman insisted his group is not a “third party” but a ”second way” to nominate a president. Any registered voter can sign up online to be a delegate. Delegates will then draft candidates and vote for their nominee in May and June.

The eventual nominee can be a member of either party or an independent but must chose a vice presidential running mate who is from a different party. Ackerman said he expected many of the losing GOP presidential candidates to move into the Americans Elect primary process after Republicans chose their nominee.

But Jonathan Ladd, an assistant government professor at Georgetown University, said he was “a bit skeptical” that ”high- quality” candidates would chose to buck their party and run under Americans Elect.

“The problem is there are a lot of benefits to being in a party,” Ladd said. “If you run as an independent it will make it harder to run for any office in your party.”

 Because the Americans Elect route carries “a lot of cost” and a “pretty low” probability of actually winning, the group will probably have a hard time getting qualified candidates to accept their nomination, Ladd said.

“High-quality candidates who are ambitious see the incentive to channel their ambitions through the party structure,” he said.

 Perhaps for this reason, the Republican Party, at least, is not too worried that an Americans Elect candidate will pose a threat to the eventual Republican nominee.

“After 32 months of unemployment exceeding 8 percent, Americans are tired of President Obama’s failed policies, and we welcome anyone interested in making Obama a one-term president,” said Republican National Committee spokeswoman Kirsten Kukowski.

The Democratic National Committee did not respond to ABC News’ request for comment.

Ackerman said “a number” of potential candidates had “expressed interest” in the Americans Elect online nominating convention, but he would not disclose who or how many.

Ackerman stressed that there was plenty of time for an additional candidate to jump into the race, because with an online primary, potential candidates would not have to do time-intensive early-primary state campaigning.

This online nominating convention gives each state an equal say in choosing the eventual nominee.

Votes cast in a state such as California, which comes so late in the Republican primary schedule that the nominee is often already chosen, will carry the same weight as votes cast in Iowa, which as the first-in-the-nation state sets the momentum for the entire primary season.

“[Americans Elect] creates this open nominating process, so it takes the power away from the parties and gives it back to the people so the people are driving the process,” Wachtel said.

The way the calendar is currently set up, presidential hopefuls have to edge toward  the extremes of their party in order to capture these vital early states, where voters tend to be more socially conservative.

“In the primaries you have to go far to the right or far to the left and tickets are having a hard time tacking back to the center,” he said. “Americans Elect allows a ticket to run authentically without having to go to extremes in the primary.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

You can be certain millions do not want a Republican mirror of Obama in Mitt Romney. Only difference is that Romney is a better manager. Sort of like having Stalin instead of Lenin at the helm. Looks like a damn good idea. I am sure there will already be a 3rd name on the ballot as the GOP Establishment will do whatever it can to stop the Ron Paul bandwagon. I nominate Paul. I suppose he can run on both the libertarian and this new party and combine the votes.

Posted by: John Acord | October 12, 2011, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

I only wish we could apply this to the Senate and Congress. That is where the real problems lie and where the real power of the parties is applied. “Out of power” Republicans effectively brought the government to a standstill, but made sure their corporate suitors were well represented. Democrats don’t know how to lead, and even if they wanted to, are too addicted to the corporate money that pays for campaigns necessary to keep their job. A pox on them all. I hope this third way can shake things up. Because we definitely need some shaking up.

Posted by: Philip | October 12, 2011, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

I agree with Philip!! The democrats don’t know how to lead and always seeks compromise whereas the republicans are like spoiled kids it is their way or no way.

Posted by: William | October 12, 2011, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Congress is needing change the most. They control much of what the President accomplishes because they can. If we could get rid of those indebted to corporations, pharmaceutical companies, rich people who pay less taxes than their employees, crooked bankers, wall street people, etc., we could accomplish something as a nation. The way I see it is this: America is circling the drain, faster every year, and I feel so badly for the kids growing up today. In my 76 years of life, I’ve never seen our nation in such distress, all because of greed and corruption in my opinion.

Posted by: Bonnie | October 13, 2011, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Agreed. Neither of the two parties nor the other two can do it. It’s either the Constitution Party or Americans Elect! See if you agree with the ONLY viable solution to America’s problems!

Posted by: JL MEALER | October 18, 2011, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

I would assume an online primary to be totally hackable and untrustworthy, especially if Trump is involved. A successful third party must have feet on the ground, not noses in the Cloud.

Posted by: Hawk | December 23, 2011, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.