Durbin to Bank of America Customers: ‘Get the Heck Out of That Bank’
Holding up a plastic debit card on the Senate floor this afternoon, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., had some advice for Bank of America customers angry about the new $5 monthly fee: leave.
“Bank of America customers, vote with your feet, get the heck out of that bank,” Durbin said on the Senate floor. “Find yourself a bank or credit union that won’t gouge you for $5 a month and still will give you a debit card that you can use every single day. What Bank of America has done is an outrage.”
Durbin said consumers are rightfully outraged about last week’s announcement.
“It is hard to believe that a bank would impose such a fee on loyal customers who simply are trying to access their own money on deposit at Bank of America,” he said. “Especially when Bank of America for years has been encouraging their customers to use debit cards as much as possible.”
Most basic checking accounts at Bank of America will see a 40 percent jump in monthly costs and the bank says the debit fee will be waived for customers who upgrade to “premium” accounts that require higher minimum balances.
The Dodd-Frank financial law this month lowers “interchange fees” that banks can charge retailers for debit transactions. Fees for retailers will shrink from 44 cents to a cap of 24 cents, which has led some debit card issuers to seek other ways to make up that lost revenue. Some people have blamed Durbin for his amendment, which capped the so-called swipe fees that banks can charge retailers.
“I am honored to be connected with this effort,” Durbin said today. “What we are doing is fair to try to strike some balance in an industry that has shown little or no balance. And one of the worst offenders in this is Bank of America, the largest bank in the United States.”
Meanwhile, the Bank of America homepage was down today for the second consecutive business day, which bank officials attributed to traffic and not hackers or malware.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Unmitigated gall. There was an equilibrium until Turban Durbin messed it up. Before, the merchant was bearing the cost. Now YOU are. Thanks to Obama, Pelosi,. Reid and DURBIN.
Posted by: Ronaldus Hyattus | October 3, 2011, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Barnum and Bailey have a spot reserved for “Dick” aif the voters of Illinois ever come to their senses.
Posted by: Ted Peters | October 3, 2011, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
All these legislating from the bench have unintended consequences. People, why do you keep voting idiot like Durbin?
Posted by: myohmy | October 3, 2011, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
I guess he won’t be getting the same campaign contributions from BoA his Republican opponents will recieve. How can he possibly stay in office without corporate support?
Posted by: george | October 3, 2011, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
Sorry Durbin but it is the legislation passed by Congress that led to these fees. Every time Congress steps in to help the consumer it ends up costing us.
Posted by: THOMAS | October 3, 2011, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
I just don’t get why republicans seem to believe banks should get to do whatever they wish.
Posted by: secondlook | October 3, 2011, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
So what doea Durbin want..a run on the bank? I disagree with their $5 charge, and if I were a customer I might leave over it…but his statement in todays unsettled climate is ill advised to say the least.
Posted by: cindy | October 3, 2011, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Dick, come on, this shows your total lack of business sense (along with your partners Dodd-Frank). BoA is a business. When you raise taxes, fees, etc, on businesses, guess who pays? The consumer. Been that way since forever ago and always will be. If you guys would stop your knee jerk reactions trying to politically satisfy those jumping up and down, we would all be better off. You are a politician first. Please remember.
Posted by: Salty | October 3, 2011, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
So we bail them out only to put them out of business a couple years later. Any person in government who thought that BOA or any business would not pass taxes, regulation, and fees on to consumers, isn’t smart enough to hold their job. If banks made money off of savings and checking accounts they might care but they don’t, they can’t interest rates are too low for them to loan money, and the people that want the loans may or may not be able to pay it back, so they buy T-Bills with money loaned to them from the government and the Fed at 0%, it is free profit created by inflation. A run on BOA would destroy FDIC, and would cause all other major banks to collapse and echo through the economy for years, but it needs to happen, it should have happened 3 years ago.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | October 3, 2011, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
yes, walk away from BofA! any bank is better than this one.
Posted by: nati | October 3, 2011, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Durbin is an irresponsible jerk. Why would a Senator basically call for a run on a bank? The best way to get the point across, that this is unacceptable is for us not to use the check card feature for a few months. Perhaps the loss of revenue from the fees would wake them up. Also, has anyone noticed a decrease in prices due to retailers getting a little extra money from the reduced fees? The only ones paying for this are the consumers.
Posted by: Wayne | October 4, 2011, 12:42 am 12:42 am
I left BoA over two years ago when they announced they would make loans and issue credit cards to illegal aliens. If all their business practices are that bad, no wonder they went under.
Posted by: oonogil7 | October 4, 2011, 2:08 am 2:08 am
Thanks Dick, for all the governement intervention over the years which led to those fees. We have you and your cabal of tax loving democrats to blame. We all know your role.
Posted by: jonny | October 4, 2011, 6:36 am 6:36 am
I personally have free checking and get free checks so if my bank wants to impose debit fees I’ll just write checks. lets face it, you’re all off base. It costs the bank far less to process debit card fees. They require little more than a 2 second job on a mainframe that processes literally thousands of transactions in that time. Better we write checks that require human intervention?
Posted by: DK | October 4, 2011, 7:00 am 7:00 am
Closing my account this week. I’m over the bank. They get bailed out, then they rape us over a barrel? No thanks. Hope b of a goes under and we see bankers diving from the 13th floor soon.
Without risk capitalism doesn’t exist. It seems that they have the system rigged now to F us either way and I don’t want them to have a dime of my money. Corporate welfare on the peoples backs. No thanks.
Posted by: John Rambo | October 4, 2011, 7:01 am 7:01 am
by the way, you did read the “premium accounts” part right? So what they’re really doing is targeting their poor customers and getting yet more blood from the stone. Most of us have nothing to worry about as we can keep our balance above the limit but the poor and the unemployed can’t. Just another example of the have’s taking from the have not’s. It’s disgusting and it should be illegal for a big powerful bank to take advantage of the downtrodden.
Posted by: DK | October 4, 2011, 7:03 am 7:03 am
Defending the banks who OWN both parties and trying to turn this into a left right thing is laughable. How much tarp money did these pukes get? Now they want to raise fees on us after we indebted our great grand kids to bail them out? Hahaha what a joke.
Posted by: John Rambo | October 4, 2011, 7:05 am 7:05 am
End the federal reserve. Return glass Steagall. Arrest JP morgan and Goldman sachs. Put these crooks on trail for their lives.
Posted by: John Rambo | October 4, 2011, 7:07 am 7:07 am
I have been a cust at a small town bank for 22yrs and could not be more satisfied.
The service and NO fees they provide is second to none. BOA is the problem and so are all the other,(to big to fail inc’s).Washington is to blame for the shaft the americans are once again getting.News headlines that read ,Huge merger pending Fed approval is a joke.They are ALL approved,2 big Entertainment co’s,2 big banks,2 big cell phone co’s.These idiots dont even know what the word monopoly means.So keep electing people with great 20 minute sound bites to hold office for 20 yrs.Teddy Roosevelt stood up to this culture,with his big stick.Now this culture beats us down with a big checkbook.YOUR Rep/Sen have sold you out to the highest bidder,BOA and friends.
Posted by: citrus steve | October 4, 2011, 7:49 am 7:49 am
BofA has the Audacity to flip the bird not only to their customers, but to law makers. This need to blame Someone is the new American Way. Forget blame. Trying to put our legislators in a positive light, Durbin and the finance gurus wanted to save merchants @23 cents for each debit card they processed. Did they anticipate this would result in lower prices to consumers? Make businesses more consumer friendly b/c they accepted debit cards, and increase sales? I know of very few businesses that don’t take plastic nowadays. How easy is it for a merchant to spread the cost of debit cards across their inventory? Very easy, I’m sure.
But BofA has the chance to rake in TONS of cash at $5 a month for every debit card user. Does a joint account with two users =$10 a month?
What annoys me is Durbin and his gang couldn’t see the consequences of their actions. This is historically how it goes — gov’t regulates and We the People take it in the shorts. It happened when they split up Ma Bell and others I can’t quote from memory. Whatever good intentions were behind this law, it’s blown up in their faces. A lot of folks are leaving BofA if blogs are believable. Good. Credit Unions are your best bet. Don’t pay to use your own money, especially when there’s zip dividends to be made anymore.
Posted by: wildblueyondergoAF | October 4, 2011, 8:44 am 8:44 am
Durbin Get The Heck Out Of Congress You Dumbass it was your freaking regulation that caused this whole mess!!!
Posted by: Francisco | October 4, 2011, 10:39 am 10:39 am
DONT BE SURPRISE PEOPLE IF YOUR SMALL BANKS START CHARGING TOO BECAUSE LIKE BIG BANKS THEY ARE ALSO GOING TO BE AFFECTED!!!
Posted by: Francisco | October 4, 2011, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Dick Durbin, a patriot – NOT
Posted by: snapperman | October 4, 2011, 11:54 am 11:54 am
This fee is a direct reslut of the Dodd / Frank Bill, which Dick Turbin Durbin was a huge supporter of… Thanks Dick…
Posted by: Cliff | October 4, 2011, 11:54 am 11:54 am
I do the opposite of what Dick Durbin tells me……
Posted by: mark smith | October 4, 2011, 11:56 am 11:56 am
What a STUPID irresponsible thing to say!!!! Run that bank and not only will people lose their money it will start a chain reaction that will send this economy into free fall….seriously how stupid can one person be
Posted by: samhiguchi | October 4, 2011, 11:57 am 11:57 am
How irresponsible of Durbin. This will do nothing but hurt investors. As if the collapse of the stock market we are currently facing isn’t enough. The end of our Country can’t come soon enough for these progressives.
Posted by: Karl | October 4, 2011, 11:58 am 11:58 am
“The banks got bailout money” – Many banks were FROCED by this admin to take the bailout money so quit your bellyaching about evil banks. They are businesses and any business is going to continue to try to make money. If you think that businesses are in business to lose money you’re a moron. they all figure out ways to navigate around oppressive govt regulation
Posted by: Kevin | October 4, 2011, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Seen on the street in Chicago about twenty years ago:
Guy with a sandwich board with the President and Sen. Durbin’s economic philosophy:
“Tax the Rich, Tax the Banks, Tax the Corporations…
Distribute the Money
ALL LIVE SWELL”
We’ve done the above, I’m waiting for the last part to kick in.
Posted by: Duckandcover | October 4, 2011, 11:59 am 11:59 am
This isn’t difficult people. If you don’t like the service (and fees) at BofA or any other bank just leave. Wells Fargo just did the same thing by charging $3 for their debit cards and I left them after being a customer for 10 years. It’s called a free market!! The more the government tries to regulate them the more the customer suffers. Just move on and quit your whining.
Posted by: chris | October 4, 2011, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
This fool caused this, stop with the lobbying!!! The bank is countering the regulations that this bafoon created!!!
Posted by: WHAT | October 4, 2011, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
This is all going to end very badly. This dolt Durbin is forcing all banks to do this. BOA is just the first to start doing this.
Posted by: Dave in Houston | October 4, 2011, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
They used a “run” to kill IndyMac and make billions, B of A’s new fee is a better reason than failing to tide suffincly.
Posted by: William J Archambault Jr | October 4, 2011, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Suntrust is even worse. I received a letter in the mail yesterday. My FREE checking is going away, there will be a $7 per month fee to retain an account with them. In addition, they will be charging $5 per month if you use your debit card. Bye bye Suntrust!
Why does BoA make the news when Suntrust doubled their fees over BoA?
Posted by: Beve | October 4, 2011, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
I’ve never had a debit card, and I boycott all major banks, especially Citibank and Bank of America. These banks are insolvent.
Posted by: Ron Paul 2012 | October 4, 2011, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Durbin the dumba$$
Posted by: Peter | October 4, 2011, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Hey, Dick. It’s your fault this fee is being levied on customers in the first place. You slipped in that amendment to Dodd-Frank at the last minute that led to the banks having to pass on these new costs to consumers.
Posted by: Adam_ME | October 4, 2011, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Well, Dickey must not be on the same page as Barry…
Didn’t Buffet just buy a ton of stock in BOA?
Posted by: Michael | October 4, 2011, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Schumer caused a deliberate run at IndiMac with his famous letter and George Soros bought it for pennies on the dollar. Now its Durbin’s turn to make Soros richer.
Posted by: ed | October 4, 2011, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
This is the height of public official’s irresponsibility, let alone personal hubris. This piece of leftist crap has the gall to badmouth an institution that is reeling from the non-sense propagated upon it by the Dodd-Frank legislation? I hope that all individual and institutional shareholders sue this buffoon for public officials’ liability for any and all economic damages resulting from his stupid and negligent comments.
Posted by: Bruce Fernandez | October 4, 2011, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
I wonder which bank is lining Durbin’s pockets these days…He looks like a Wells Fargo man to me. You are a despicable disgrace to the office sir and you should be reprimanded to prison for the damage that you and your comrades have caused to this once great country. I would like to throw rotten food at you, Barny Franks, and the rest of you disasters as they parade you down the street in shackles. shame on you low life.
Posted by: rodpeters | October 4, 2011, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
So Democrats caused this with their constant over regulation. Now a democrat pretends that they didn’t cause it? Shame on Democrats. Repeal Dodd-Frank and remove outrageous fees and overcharging.
Posted by: ricardo maxwell | October 4, 2011, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
I just made up my mind… I’ll KEEP all my BOA accounts. It’s now time to REPEAL Dodd/Frank, and get rid of ALL Democrats in 2012!
Posted by: R Meyer | October 4, 2011, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Great. Ironically, now we HAVE to go get our money out of the bank before it fails. Thanks a lot, Dick. You made them levy this fee because of that stupid amendment, and now you’re sabotaging the bank.
Posted by: orlandorays | October 4, 2011, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
BoA is not the only bank charging the fee! Suntrust and others have already been doing it.
Posted by: CopyKatNJ | October 4, 2011, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Good thing nobody listens to Democrats in Congress. And they said yelling “fire” in a crowded theater is ill advised! This is plain reckless given the state of economy and fact B of A is the largest U.S. banks in terms of deposits. People will leave of their own accord and act in their best economic interest. Put a sock in it!
Posted by: Daniel Bryant | October 4, 2011, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Nice…a member of Congress advocating civil unrest to bring down a financial institution.
Posted by: Buddy P | October 4, 2011, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
So, once again, government interferes in the market place and the market responds. Isn’t that what a “free market” is all about? Now Durbin, rather than accept responsibility for what his interference has caused, calls for the people to punish the bank. Great…so what happens if they really do make a run on BofA? The bank fails, millions lose money and thousands lose jobs…why? All because government wouldn’t leave the free market alone…they (Durbin) just had to stick their fingers in and muck about where they didn’t belong. This is irresponsible government at its worst!
Posted by: Jose | October 4, 2011, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Durbin introduced legislation to cut merchant fees in half and then wonders why the bank seeks to charge a fee to make up the lost income his legislation caused. Durbin then has the gall to call for a run on the bank. Illinois voters really need to pull their heads out of their anuses and quit voting for idiots like Durbin, Obama, Rahm, etc.
Posted by: Kevin Johnson | October 4, 2011, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
You bastard Turbin Durban!
It’s your fault for the fee and now you are telling customers to run on the bank?
How dare you!
I want Turban Durbin ARRESTED NOW!
Posted by: Sickofobama | October 4, 2011, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
The stock markets are teetering towards another ’08-style crash, and the #2 democrat in the Senate is trying to crash one of the nation’s largest banks. . .
At this point I’m waiting for the ghost of henry clay or daniel webster to show up on the Senate floor and stuff this moron in a trash can
Posted by: Tommy | October 4, 2011, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Democrat crooks, morons and marxists.
Posted by: Kay Sainte | October 4, 2011, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Very good advice. BOA *WILL* tank and the crooks in charge will scamper off with anything not nailed down. We re entering into the Next Great Depression and, in that world, Bank Of America, all of those “too big to fail” Wall Street institutions, have no chance whatsoever of survival. Their political connections to this rancid and corrupt White House wont help them and their late switching to supporting the Republican’s own corrupt and clueless version of this wont help them at all.
Posted by: Mike | October 4, 2011, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
This guy is a nut. Why doesn’t he care about the fees “taxes” I pay to the government? Check out your tax withholdings, the taxes on your phone bill, the sales tax you pay, the gas tax you pay and Durbin got the gall to say BOA is ripping us off for $5 bucks?
Posted by: Ed Brown | October 4, 2011, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
This is insanity. Durbin FORCED the banks to raise their fees, and them blames THE BANKS when they do so.
I no longer believe people like Dick Durbin and Harry Reid are incompetant idiots. I believe they are intentionally trying to bring about the downfall of America. Durbin needs to be impeached, tried for Treason, and imprisoned by the United States Government. The sooner this happens the better for America. Oh wait, we have Eric Holder in charge of Justice, and he has the same goals as Traitor Durbin.
I guess we’re all screwed now. Making a TRUE “change” on November 6, 2012, is our only hope.
Posted by: jochtrim | October 4, 2011, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
another dumb Dick democrat that has no idea how the free market works. who are the fools that vote for people like this?
Posted by: jgalt | October 4, 2011, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Durbin is a tool for the big Box retailers. It was Walmart & Target who lobbied Durbin for this amendment. Not only is he tool but dumb fool. A very classic example of what happens when govt. gets in the way of business….regardless of their intentions, its always the the citizens who end up paying….
When will they ever learn?(never)….
Posted by: Atomic Comic | October 4, 2011, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Did anyone ever wonder why they call him Dick?
What a pathetic dishonest lying POS!!
Posted by: Pat McGroinagin | October 4, 2011, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
“Why does BoA make the news when Suntrust doubled their fees over BoA?”
All banks are increasing fees for all customers to make up for the Govt. cutting penalty amounts banks charge to delinquent customers. So customers in good standing are paying more to make up for the deadbeats. Thanks Progressives!
Posted by: still_grizzled | October 4, 2011, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
“It is hard to believe that a bank would impose such a fee on loyal customers…”
It’s NOT hard believe! In fact, Durbin and others were told well in advance of their debit card bill that banks will simply forward the cost to customers. The same will happen when Democrats stop giving breaks to oil and gas. As much as we might hate to admit it, these companies WILL get their money. As soon as regulators start going after oil companies, we can all expect $5 gallons of gas. Insurance companies too. Like most liberal wishful thinking, from bottled water to the health care bill, they create hot messes out of their “good” intentions.
Posted by: JDW | October 4, 2011, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
My name says it all. isn’t precipitating a run on a bank a Federal crime?
Posted by: Durbin Sux | October 4, 2011, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
How unamerican and anti middle class can you get with these democrats. Now you have Durbin encouraging the failure of a company that employs thousands of Americans who will have to go on unemployment. Time to get rid of all these failed democrats in 2012.
Posted by: J.Herrera | October 4, 2011, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
these scumbag pols like Obama and Durbin sue the banks to force them to give bad loans now they go after the banks after they caused the banks their problems. ALL of them should be thrown in jail, Obama and Durbin are as guilty as anyone for the economic mess.
Posted by: jef | October 4, 2011, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
The Run on BOA has already begun. Their site was down for 4 days – yea right. No one could access their accounts to withdraw and close them. And, their stock hit an all-time low of $5.23 a share! They have more regulatory investigations by the Feds and state AGs. They recently were served with the AIG lawsuit ($11 billion) in damages and the ML lawsuit ($50 billion) in damages. They have more exposure than their entire market capitalization. There are thousands of sound banks out there that did not participate in the outrageous loan pooling fraud tied to the inflated RMBS and CMBS like BOA did that can pick up BOA’s business. The notion of “forced” to take TARP funds is not true, it was a safeguard. And now the FHA is not going to pay the crooked banks for foreclosing and the electorate (Democrats, Independents and Republicans) are in no mood for another taxpayer bailout.
Posted by: Hooverville | October 4, 2011, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Shrink the government and regulation so that the role of lobbyists is diminished. No brainer.
Posted by: Todd | October 4, 2011, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
All this from a man who hasn’t personally a paid a fee for anything in his 20+ years of feeding t the public trough.
Posted by: Barry Soetoro | October 4, 2011, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
First you need to understand that most of your house members and senators are lawyers. Now you have a useless puck like Duban, a lawyer, telling banks what they can make. But, let’s don’t even discuss tort reform, in other words telling a lawyer what he can make, no no no. DON’T SEND MORE LAWYERS TO WASHINGTON.
Posted by: larry | October 4, 2011, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
What a twit. (Full disclosure: I misspelled one word in that post, don’t correct me!)
Posted by: piercej | October 4, 2011, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
This is pretty frustrating. But I agree with one of the previous comments. I will refrain from using my debit card and will write checks and walk into the bank from now on to get cash. In the meantime, I will work towards moving my assets from BoA to a credit union I already belong to. Inconvenient and a pain in the arse but I’m done with this bank.
Posted by: druvas | October 4, 2011, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
The Democratic Senate made themselves proud for regulating the banking system, than they cheered when Obama signed it into law,
Now they bitch about as an unintentional consequence hurts the consumers.
It shows how narrow and short sighted our Congress is, especially Durbin (the knight in shining armor) comes to attack the banks instead of himself.
Stupid and shallow remarks like this, makes him sound like fool.
Posted by: Gloriaw | October 4, 2011, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Get rid of Durbin all ready – does anyone believe that banking is free? How the hell do you think they pay for their computers and security? Employees, facilities – the ATM machines – all free?
Guess what, its called BUSINESS – not HOBBY. Durbin is a pandering fool and once again the Democrats win because we have so many lemmings in this country. You’re the same people that will pay endless amount of money for bottled WATER because it has a pretty picture on a plastic bottle – yet its no better than what comes out of your kitchen facuet.
Remember BUSINESS – not HOBBY. Is Durbin coming after your lively hood next because its not fair that you earn a paycheck for your hard work? My guess is yes. Illinois wake up already and get rid of this idiot Durbin.
Posted by: BobinNC | October 4, 2011, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
“I just don’t get why republicans seem to believe banks should get to do whatever they wish.”
We don’t, gullible MORON, that’s what folks like Durbin tell you to regurgitate and you cheerfully swallow and purge on command.
Disgusting.
Posted by: Dave | October 4, 2011, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Enough with the TARP funds. All of the banks, including BofA has paid them back with interest.
The only question remains is what did Little Timothy Geithner hide them?….hmmmm…..
Posted by: Atomic Comic | October 4, 2011, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
The Democrats are trying to destroy our economy. Their actions and the results are self evident. These lawyer / politicians are not dumb! They want a EuroSocio society that protects them and their cronies from free market pressures and competition.
It is time to fire them and all Republicans of like mind!
VOTE LOUD in 20121!!!
Posted by: Vote Loud | October 4, 2011, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
I really don’t know why Democrats keep getting this unfair label of being anti-business??
Posted by: Christopher | October 4, 2011, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Typical liberal can’t acknowledge the unintended consequeses of his stupid liberal tinkering with private industry.
Since when does Durbin get to pick the winners and losers?
Posted by: Don | October 4, 2011, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Nice SPIN Durbin. This is a classic mis-direction that allows for politicians to get away with poorly thought out legislation. So how is Redbox going to survive in this new pricing scheme?
Posted by: HOWONEARTH | October 4, 2011, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
The Durbin amendment added to the Frank-Dodd bill simply shifted the cost from retailers to banks. This was a completely predictable result. It should be named the Durbin Fee.
News flash to politicians: businesses do not pay taxes or fees–consumers do. You can monkey around with who collects fees and taxes, but consumers always pay.
Posted by: stvnscott | October 4, 2011, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Frankly, this just takes the cake!
The idiots Frank and Dodd slapped a ton of restrictive regulations on Banks, and expects that the Banks won’t pass this added cost on to the consumer. You can’t make this stuff up…every bleeding Congressman/woman is an idiot when it comes to the private sector. EVERY ONE!
When are Americans going to tell the Government to stay out of business?
Well they say you get the Government you deserve, and we keep voting for the Schumers, Franks, Dodds, Pelosis, Reids and …wait, why are there so many Democrats?
Posted by: TroyG | October 4, 2011, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Spare us the mock outrage; we are capable of making our own decisions. Turban Durbin and co are bankrupting us while pointing the finger at free enterprise.
Posted by: Willie | October 4, 2011, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
It’s called, THE DICK DURBIN DEBIT CARD FEE. Now he is against it? hahahahahahahahaha
Posted by: Payola | October 4, 2011, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
The Democrats did it, no surprise.
Posted by: Mike P. | October 4, 2011, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
He’s right – it’s your choice as a customer to vote with your feet and leave. Now, the real question is whether or not your choice is based on logic, or emotion. So whats it gonna be, Hmmmm??
Posted by: MikeH | October 4, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
I am an Illinois voter and he will never get my vote again.
What a pandering fool who has bankrupted the USA with his deficit spending.
Posted by: Illinois Voter | October 4, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
If you don’t want to pay a debit card fee, DON’T USE A DEBIT CARD. This is pretty simple stuff, Dick.
Posted by: Paradigm Shift | October 4, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Durbin is directly responsible for the need for banks to seek additional fees. When a stupid senator tries to show he knows banking, the only result can be unintended consequences. Dumb durbin is one of the worst senators and a democrat and the poster CHILD for TERM LIMITATIONS FOR CONGRESS.
Congress and nobama should stay out of regulations and busines and let the free market work for ITSELF. If the jerk turdin had left well-enough-alone, the market woiuld have determined if things were TOO expensive.
These democraps are the worst thing for our Great Nation and the election is 12012 are the remedy.
CUSTOMERS, DON’T VOTE WITH YOUR FEET, VOTE WITH YOUR VOTE AND VOTE THESE IDIOT DEMOCRATS OUT OF OFFICE.
Posted by: truspeek | October 4, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
The problem is that BofA should be out of business already. The bailouts were a horrible idea.
But this issue of debit card fees is precisely the result of the Barney Frank and Chris Dodd. They cut a company’s income and then expect that the company won’t raise fees somewhere else? How idiotic are these two clowns? They’re definitely too damned stupid to be in Congress. And this fee will fall harder on those with less money, all thanks to democrats (the champions of the poor, no less).
Posted by: Justin | October 4, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Economic idiots like Durbin are a prime example of how Gov’t is killing the economy.
First they pass a law limiting what a business can charge one thing, then they’re shocked that the business charges more elsewhere to make up the loss. Businesses are only In Business to make a profit. If they can’t, they won’t be in business.
It’s Math!!! All the empalthy in the world for the number 5 doesn’t change the fact that 2+2=4.
Posted by: Tom Genin | October 4, 2011, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Dems just don’t get it.
Just like minimum wage hikes. You pay your burger flippers $8/hour. New legislation requires them to now be paid $9/hour. What’s a business owner going to do? Take the extra labor costs in the short? Nope. They either increase prices or decrease services to maintain their profit margin.
This is EXACTLY the same thing. Did Durbin and his cronies actually believe that BofA, Wells Fargo, JPM, Citi and others would simply just eat the lost revenue? Those banks owe it to their shareholders to achieve maximum earnings. Only way that happens is to charge more. It’s so simple to understand that my 10 year old daughter gets it.
Posted by: BJ | October 4, 2011, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
“I am honored to be connected with this effort,” Durbin said …..He should be. It was HIS bill that caused this fee.
Posted by: Rob | October 4, 2011, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Just closed my account at B of A. More underlying problems than the new fee. Not a bank that I will
be referring ANYONE to.
Posted by: kirkwoodstudio | October 4, 2011, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Guess who wrote the bill which has become law. SENATOR DURBIN!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: gloria grissom | October 4, 2011, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
The folks who are screaming to high heaven about $5/mo. are probably the same ones who have no problem paying $5/mo. more for cable channels, more texts on their cell phones, or coffees at the local Starbucks. When you do the math, it works out to 16 cents per day – this $5 increase. What most consumers don’t realize is that banks are charged on every transaction that those debit cards make. How did that happen? Government regulation. I despise Dick Durbin and find his comments to be nothing more than grandstanding. He and his ilk are the ones who set up transaction fees that these banks must absorb. Its not BOA’s fault their trying to recoup the cost in order to keep their company soluble as well as keep employees paid instead of on the Obama dole.
Posted by: RW | October 4, 2011, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Excuse me,”Thomas”? You don’t understand why Republicans think banks should be able to do whatever they wish? Because they are privately owned companies, you dolt. Heavily regulated, but private companies. You don’t like it? Move your account…..but what are you going to do when the bank you move to copies Bank of America?
Posted by: adam | October 4, 2011, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
This story was linked on Drudge and I don’t understand what was meant by “bank run.”
Does that mean people that have money they earned in the bank and the bank sends them statements every month saying how much?
How does a person going to the bank to get what is rightfully theirs change anything?
Why is it different if every person goes to the bank to get what is rightfully theirs?
Does the bank not have what they claim?
Isn’t there a word for that?
I believe the word is “fraud.”
There is a general misnomer that the fed creates an “elastic” currency (NOT money) but it is false.
Elastic means the currency supply would have to contract but it only expands.
M3 is a measure of total currency. Why don’t they release those numbers any more? Trying to hide something?
What does that do to the value of the federal reserve notes that I’m paid with?
Is it not the stated policy of the federal reserve and the de facto policy of the us govt to perpetually devalue our units of trade and account?
Am I an evil “conspiracy theorist” for calling out the self evident fraud?
…….”homeless in the land their forefathers conquered.”
Now please do yourto own research and prove me wrong!
Posted by: matt | October 4, 2011, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Banks are privately owned? WTF? thanks for the heads up, I better sell my BofA stock before everybody finds out…LOL
Posted by: Atomic Comic | October 4, 2011, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Does everyone notice the coordinated attack from the Durbin, Obama, MSNBC and NPR? Last Friday, the same day the fees were announced, NPR ran a story using interviews with people on the streets of Washington, DC that were so slanted that the questions could just as well been written by Dick Durbin – one the sponsors of legislation that set this up.
Posted by: J Wheelzr | October 4, 2011, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
I recently took my money out of BOA simply because I thought the bank was in trouble. I now have it in a local bank that has been steady for a long, long time–very conservative. The staff looks and behaves like bankers should. BOA looks like casual Friday all the time. I don’t use debit cards and cannot imagine why anyone would continue to do so with this firm. Mr. Durbin, however, really shouldn’t be telling people not to use the bank since he wrote the bill that caused the problem.
Posted by: Sharon | October 4, 2011, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Durbin: “It is hard to believe that a bank would impose such a fee …”
Believe it Dick. You completely caused it.
Total Dufus. The thing that is IMPOSSIBLE to believe is that somebody would vote for you.
Posted by: CerpherJoe | October 4, 2011, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Durbin obviously is trying to avoid blame for what he’s caused. Shows what happens when the politicians decide to “help” people. Now the poor are getting screwed by Durbin,.
Posted by: ramon leigh | October 4, 2011, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Ha! Never thought I would say this but I agree with Durbin 100% on this. BofA is the largest and dirtiest predatory lender in the world. I would NEVER have my money there in the first place but if I did, my tail would have withdrawn all of my cash by the end of that business day. Many people with BofA mortgages call me begging for help to refinance them away from BofA. Many stating they wouldn’t even care if the rate was higher and you wouldn’t believe the horror stories. I’m getting out of Chase as we speak for the same reasons. Stick to your local community banks and credit unions.
Posted by: Mortgage Guy | October 4, 2011, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
That is just what this administration would like. They want to take down the banks. Funny how people hand the government any old tax they levy, but whine when B of A tries to recover some of what the government forced them to lose. Some of you folks need to do your homework,
Posted by: Bella | October 4, 2011, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Paraphrasing Durbin: “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain! Your competent and friendly government is not to blame for the unintended consequences of poorly thought-out interference in the free market. Blame the banks! How dare they defy us in an attempt to protect profits!”
Posted by: zebsdad | October 4, 2011, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Dick Durban…..a man by any other name would be, well…..still a Dick.
Posted by: used2livethere | October 4, 2011, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Sovereign / Santander bank charges more for their ATM usage. Why was there no liberal uproar when they started charging $1.00 per TRANSACTION 3 years ago?
I would rather pay the $5 per month. Hypocrits, the lot of you!
Posted by: baywatch | October 4, 2011, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
I don’t know why they just don’t break ‘em up. Then they wouldn’t need to be regulated and they wouldn’t be too big to fail.
Posted by: Tim | October 4, 2011, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Thanks Dick for screwing the entire country. Good luck with your re-election and subsequent retirement. You pretty much screwed the entire nation to the point where there’s not much left. You and your fellow BS salesmen can’t just go away, can you?
Posted by: Randy | October 4, 2011, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
DROP DEAD DURBIN. ILL land of idiots
Posted by: Dave | October 4, 2011, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Congress needs to stop “fixing” things. I still haven’t forgiven them for stealing the interest write offs we used to have before they messed things up back in the 70′s. They need to restore what they stole, but that isn’t going to happen. Now we’re seeing the fees from the banking industry passed on to the consumer – exactly what we were told was not going to happen. Nice work.
Posted by: Pat | October 4, 2011, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
This is outrageous!!! Durbin is calling for a run on a US company. There are hunfreds of thousands of people who work for this bank. Meanwhile Obama is allowing Debt collectors on Student Loans to call on their cell phones. It’s about time realize that this administration is our enemy. They are not fighting for the little guy they are fighting for themselves and government control of YOU in every possible way. Meanwhile wasting the taxpayers money. Pretty soon there won’t be any taxpayers and then what will they do. Hard labor camps.
Posted by: Kala | October 4, 2011, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
What money?
Posted by: Magneto | October 4, 2011, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
I will gladly pay the $5.00 monthly if Dick Turban is so vociferously against it. Anything he says must be wrong.
Posted by: Joseph Goldberg | October 4, 2011, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
The guy who caused the problem, is now asking you to leave the bank because of the amendment he had attached to the Dodd-Frank bill. Good grief he can’t even remember his own bill! He needs to be out of government
Posted by: Ron T | October 4, 2011, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
>”I just don’t get why republicans seem to believe banks should get to do whatever they wish.” posted by Second Look
answer: Because this is supposed to be a free country.
Posted by: Captain Obvious | October 4, 2011, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Obviously the people commenting here are not business owners. When a business accepts these credit/debit cards, we are charged all sorts of fees depending on the card. Accepting cards costs my small business over $4,000 a year in fees from the processor. If the customer wants the convenience of using a card instead of cash, then why shouldn’t the customer bear some of the costs?
Posted by: AngelM | October 4, 2011, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Hilarious, the irony of unintended consequences. Liberals try to “manage” something and the exact opposite result occurs. Durbin now needs to pass another law to correct the consequences of the last law. Permanent employment and endless laws / regulations. LMAO.
Posted by: Craigster | October 4, 2011, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Typical democrats, they screw it up and then blame someone else. Sub prime loans, debit cards, the economy, etc.
Posted by: Tom | October 4, 2011, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
I wonder if Senator Turban shorted BofA before making this speech. He plays his constituents as fools. What did he think would happen? I wouldn’t bank at BofA if it were the last bank on earth because its consumer banking always has been junk and full of fees. That’s how BofA makes money–it provides banking services for a fee. His legislation takes away millions a day in merchant fees for BofA. You think it might have to make it up somewhere? Also, where is that fee better applied? To the merchant, who can easily absorb it into a $150 purchase, or by dinging the account holder every month. It’s all insanity.
Posted by: TXguy71 | October 4, 2011, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
The consumer always pays this– either via the cost of products or direct to BoA. If it’s direct to BoA than only the folks using debit cards are paying for it vice the cost being distributed across all consumers. For example, Wal-Mart used to pay BoA by covering the cost of this by figuring it into the cost of their products which everyone paid. Now, they can lower prices and only those folks using debit cards will pay the fee– direct to BoA
Posted by: styrgwillidar | October 4, 2011, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Only the stupid still have accounts at Banksters of America.
Posted by: John Tokalenko | October 4, 2011, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
October 4, 2011
Dear Mr. Durbin,
Let’s evaluate your notion that I should cease my relationship with The Bank of America. Let it be known that, like any other business I voluntarily decide to do business with, I’ve had my set of stresses and complaints with. For instance once Citibank upset me to such a degree I switched to Bank of America. I’m certain that the opposite has occurred too. No person or collection of persons is/are or ever will be perfect in all cases. Human beings are unique and when they do business they bring a completely new set of experiences to the door of that business and if the business does a good job of being inviting as well as innovative then that business does well, see Apple Computer. If the opposite happens that business is taken apart and absorbed into the stream of commerce where it’s parts are better able to function efficiently.
So. Mr. Durbin. The federal government is trillions in debt and deficit. Is losing customers, I mean tax payers, by the second, and you have the temerity to go to the floor of United States Senate and tell Bank of America customers to leave the bank? That takes chutzpah considering your voting record sir, a Mount Everest size portion of it! You’ve got as much credibility as Eric Holder does now and his gun running scam with the ATF, what is it with you liberals and guns anyway? Look, if you don’t want one. Don’t buy one. If you don’t want to be someones friend who owns one no one is forcing you to be their friend.
But thats the rub of it all isn’t it Mr. Durbin. If I, if “We The People,” can’t be forced into having to deal with a corrupt and immoral federal government, that corrupt and immoral federal government can’t function. If everyone stops paying their taxes because they can’t find jobs, the federal government is more then happy to print up some more funny money just so long as the federal government get’s more of my forgotten liberty in the deal. At least in the mob you got a meal and a few really good laughs before you were made an offer you couldn’t refuse. With you guys it’s all sand and no lube. Where do I go as a citizen if I believe that my government is no longer operating for the benefit of the American family at large? I go to the ballot box, I go to the editorial page of my local news paper, I go to the internet comment sections of websites and one day I may take what I’ve written and put it all in a book. I will not permit you Mr. Durbin to, on the one hand, say that America is evil while you use your other hand to stick it in American’s pockets and steal their liberty from them.
I have had enough.
So have my fellow Americans. On November 6, 2012 we finish what we started.
Respectfully,
Joe Doakes
Posted by: Joe Doakes | October 4, 2011, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
As a BofA customer I am not at all happy about their announcement to charge for debit card usage and have already started looking at other banks to do my business, but it is scary to hear a US Senator on the Senate Floor telling people what companies they should ot shouldn’t do business with. Stop with adding layer upon layer upon layer of regulations and rules and the free market will take care of it. If enough customers complain or leave, BofA will re-think their decision.
Posted by: Jeff | October 4, 2011, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Dickie Durbin
wears a turbin
and causes the banks to fail.
When he’s accused
he looks bemused
knowing HE won’t go to jail.
Posted by: whodat1 | October 4, 2011, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Durbin is responsible in the provision in the Dodd Frank bill that led to this charge. It takes some serious nerve to make things worse and then blame somebody else for it.
Posted by: bskb | October 4, 2011, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
In honor of Durbin’s amendment, all Americans should call this debit card fee the Durbin Fee. Dick Durbin caused this fee on consumers, therefore, please direct your anger where it belongs — Durbin. The retail lobby provided enough incentive for Durbin to introduce the amendment; we the people got stuck with the consequences!
Posted by: George | October 4, 2011, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
As been pointed out, BofA isn’t the only bank now charging for debit cards. This is just another regressive tax on the public, which will hit the poor harder…. Make you wonder why the poor keeps voting for the same party& continues getting screwed by that party… But then when you you’re poorly educated.. its easy to buy the class warfare crap…evil banks, business,blah blah, blah….
Posted by: Atomic Comic | October 4, 2011, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Show me a solution proposed by a democrat and I’ll show you a bigger problem than that which it was created to cure.
Posted by: Mark | October 4, 2011, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
This is absolutely incredible!!!! Here’s a man, Durbin, telling people to leave BoA because of a $5.00 user charge, yet he has no qualms whatsoever about raising people’s taxes by a far greater amount.
Really…who votes for these idiots?????
Posted by: DapperDon | October 4, 2011, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
This is a good lesson on dynamic economics. Push here, bulge there. Push there, bulge elsewhere, etc. I agree, vote with your feet, but this likely should never have happened.
Posted by: Chuck | October 4, 2011, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Dick! . . .Durbin knows exactly what he’s doing and what he’s inciting is criminal and should be pursued. Congress. . .put him on the list of Obama era future prosecutions right in there with E. Holder et al.
Posted by: True Colours | October 4, 2011, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
I am not a fan of B of A but for someone in Durbin’s position to try to instigate a run on a bank is irresponsible in the extreme.
Such a run could cause the bank to collapse, this would not be confined to B of A. Other banks could fall as well and the NYSE would tank. Thousands of people would lose EVERYTHING.
Of course Mr Durbin, like most of our over-fed, over-rich politicians probably has much of his money off shore plus a nice stash of bullion in his safe so he would not be hurt.
Just the “little people”.
The people that the politicians look down on so condescendingly.
People like you and I.
Posted by: LukeJohn | October 4, 2011, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Durbin is the one that caused this fiasco.
Posted by: LYNN | October 4, 2011, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
“If I read this to you and did not tell you that it was an FBI agent describing what Americans had done to prisoners in their control, you would most certainly believe this must have been done by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags or some mad regime — Pol Pot or others — that had no concern for human beings,” – Dick Durbin describing the U.S. military at Guantanamo Bay
Posted by: driveby_poster | October 4, 2011, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
WWDDD…….. What Would’nt Dick Durbin Do? I have lived my life by this for…… well about 5 minutes but still…
Posted by: M. | October 4, 2011, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
A direct result of regulations created by this very man.
These are the same people who wanted cap and trade where it wouldn’t be $5, but hundreds of dollars more.
Posted by: Mark S | October 4, 2011, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Durbin should be trounced. He’s the one who introduced legislation that prohibited the banks from charging their business customers a fee for the convenience of using a debit card. Since the banks are in the business of making money, and they provide a value added service, of course they would want to get compensated for those services. Since Durbin won’t allow them to charge business, they are charging you. Slap Durbin upside the head if you see him, and vote him out.
Posted by: Tim | October 4, 2011, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Dick Durbin. YOU VOTED FOR THE BILL WHICH ALLOWES BoA TO DO THIS!! You JERK! Now you’re calling for what amounts to a BOYCOTT??? My God, these people in congress are as thick as the day is long.
Posted by: Jenny Bea | October 4, 2011, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
BoA announced layoffs last week AND tha tthey were lookign to get out of persoanl banking and focus on commercial. So rather than close your account and send you a check they are going to raise fees until you leave voluntarily. Either way they achieve their goal. Probably better to get out sooner rather than later.
Posted by: KenJ | October 4, 2011, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Yet another democrat patriot surfaces from the Land of Lincoln -
Posted by: snapperman | October 4, 2011, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
This is a completely transparent piece of rhetoric Sen Durbin. It’s as clear as the fluid floating inside your head that you are using this to sidestep more pressing issues for one that you believe will endear you as man of the people. Let me tell you that you are NOT. Certainly many will view you that way, but fortunately they usually don’t vote – unless of course you promise to pay their bank fees in exchange for their vote. Five dollars per can get alot of votes Senator. Being a Democrat and from Illinois certainly makes that a higher than likely possibility.
Posted by: Tom Pessa | October 4, 2011, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
THE .44 CENT MAX FEE WAS ALREADY CORRECT THANKS TO OUR FREE MARKET SYSTEM. This is another example of our bureacracy creating inefficiencies in our economy. If it was profitable at 43 cents or lower, wouldn’t other banks step up and charge the lower fee and capture some business? They didn’t. 44 cents was the correct maximum fee and now thanks to THE DURBIN DEBIT CARD RULE the cost is now born by you!! What an idiot!
Posted by: Harrison Sterling | October 4, 2011, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
BOA should not take business advice from an Officer (Senator Dick Durban) of a company (USA) that is going bankrupt because of his and other Senators/Congressmen management. Don’t throw rocks when you live in a glass house. At least they are making tough decision to counteract the position that the Durban amendment put them in financially. What a joke!
Posted by: Skip | October 4, 2011, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
BOA should not take business advice from an Officer (Senator Dick Durban) of a company (USA) that is going bankrupt because of his and other Senators/Congressmen management. Don’t throw rocks when you live in a glass house. At least they are making tough decision to counteract the position that the Durban amendment put them financially. What a joke!
Posted by: Skip | October 4, 2011, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Actually, I think it’s time that we pulled all our money out of Congress.
Oh, if only it were that easy.
Posted by: LukeJohn | October 4, 2011, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
The reason for this fee increase is the following: The bank (Bank of America, Chase, etc) and the merchant (Discover, Visa, Mastercard, etc.) require fees in order to process the transactions to the merhcant. So, every time you use your card, both the bank needs to cover the transaction fee. The old fee was 44 cents. Durbin’s amendment lowered the fee to 22 cents. Now the bank needs to increase fees to cover the lost revenue. That amount that needs to be made up is now covered by guess who…that’s right, you. The 22 cent deficit now has to be made up so the bank can cover it’s overhead. And it is the consumer who has to make up the difference. Don’t blame Back of America. They fought to keep the fees the same because they knew that lowering the fees would hurt the customer. This is going to happen to all the banks by the way. In addition, look for transaction fees from the card companies to increase as well because now the revenue they get from the banks for processing transactions has been cut in half. If you really don’t like it, you can just use a credit card. Or more logically, you can vote Durbin and Obama out of office. Durbin should be jailed for calling out a an American business that employs thousands like that. This is Soviet style tactics.
Posted by: MM | October 4, 2011, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
BofA better cancel plans for this fee if they truly want to maximize share holder value. Average citizens already see BofA in a bad light. They are only further shooting themselves in the foot, and us share holders have had enough as well. If they insist on charging this fee rather than seek other alternatives, there will be no more BofA. Just being realistic.
Posted by: B of A Stock Holder | October 4, 2011, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Durbin’s amendment cut the transaction fee from 44 cents to 22 cents. This fee is what the banks have to pay to the card companies. It was fine the way it was as the bank covered it for the customer. Why did they do this? These liberals are really insane. Leave the banks alone. They got bailed out with taxpayer money – fine. But understand that the taxpayers made a 20 billion dollar profit off of this bailout as the banks were required to pay dividends on those loans. If the treasury did not keep that 20 billion dollar profit and rediribute it back to the people, then don’t blame the banks. Blame people like Durbin who spend, spend, spend other people’s money. These democrats are really going too far. I fear violence towards them if they don’t cool it. This is people’s lives their screwing with. How dare a US Senator call out a business like that. BOA employs thousands of people!!
Posted by: RainyDay | October 4, 2011, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
I have a better idea. Instead of having a run on BoA, let’s have a run on all the democrats in Congress next year.
Posted by: DapperDon | October 4, 2011, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Make no mistake—it was the Democrats’ lame “banking reform” law that messed all of us up. It’s very obvious. The old way worked great for consumers; now we have this democrat interference with the free market. Stop voting for democrats! HAVE YOU NOTICED THAT LIBERALISM ALWAYS SEEMS TO BE ABOUT PAYING MORE? FOR EVERYTHING??
Posted by: Monterey | October 4, 2011, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
These guys are too much. five bucks is nothing compared to the increase in health care THIS YEAR…NOW…LOOK AT YOUR PREMIUMS, Look at their stock prices! like up 30%
Posted by: robert m | October 4, 2011, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Sen. Durbin is an idiot, but he’s right about one thing. BOA customers who don’t wish to pay the new fee may take their business elsewhere. That’s their prerogative.
But, Durbin is, after all, an idiot. There’s nothing wrong with BOA charging a fee for the services it provides. Its customers will decide whether the value of the services justifies the fee paid. That’s free market, free enterprise capitalism. Freedom. Freedom from idiot Senators or other government officials dictating what FREE people and FREE businesses can and can’t do.
BOA is in business to make a profit. If BOA (or any business in a FREE economy) fails to make a profit, they’ll be out of business faster than Dick Durbin can utter one more stupid thing…and that’s pretty fast.
Posted by: publius | October 4, 2011, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
You’re a fool if you’re a customer of the big banks. Bank local. If you can, join a credit union. You’ll find better service and better rates!
Posted by: nuisance | October 4, 2011, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
This is exactly what happens when government gets in the way of the market. People and businesses have a choice in which banks they use. We don’t need Dick Durban’s “help”.
Posted by: ken | October 4, 2011, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
This is serious stuff. This administration is stark raving nuts. We MUST get them out of WH now.
Posted by: Al | October 4, 2011, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
The bank has to pay for the costs of handling accesses and purchases with the cards. In the past this was subsidized by the interchange fees. Now that Frank and Durbin killed the interchange fees the bank still has the costs and has to charge directly. Durbin is such a moron. Somehow he believes that you can dramatically reduce income at a marginal bank and they will magically absorb the loss. Stupid. This guy has obviously never had to run a real business that has to pay its bills. Instead he has magical thinking.
Posted by: J Smith | October 4, 2011, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
What do the Morons expect? UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES!!! Thank the Frank-Dodd bill that this goofball supported.
Posted by: susan | October 4, 2011, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Notice how Gutless Dick Durbin courageously made his attacks on BoA from the Senate floor. He can say anything he wants from there, and is protected from any lawsuit by the Constitution’s “Speech or Debate Clause.”
Posted by: Obama's Union Thug Army | October 4, 2011, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
He’s a complete idiot and unfit to be a US senator. What about the tens of thousands of employees and their families?
Posted by: Tony | October 4, 2011, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Didn’t this guy do the same thing to help start the crash of 2008, actually about this time 3 years ago. Something about Indymac???
Then I think Harry Reid said there was going to be a big bank failure, ” But he wouldn’t say which one”
Posted by: Randall Smith | October 4, 2011, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
It’s not really politicians fault. BofA is a publicly traded corporation. They chose to raise their fees, it’s up to the consumers to make their own decision. I don’t understand the outrage from the morons on this board.
Posted by: Sandy Underpants | October 4, 2011, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Hey Dick Turbin, your addendum to the Dodd-Frank legislation is the reason for these fees by BofA! They are covering their costs which in the the wisdom of you idiots on Mount Olympus (Democrats in Congress).
YOU created this problem!
So you along with Christopher Dodd and Barney Frank should be wearing orange jump suits in some prison because of the damage you and there are others of your ilk that are destroying this country becuase you do not like captialism and the free market. Oh yeah, you radical left-wingers want to control and be masters over our lives!
Posted by: Mark in St. Louis, MO | October 4, 2011, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Bank of america (bank of italy) sucks, and always has…I have not dealt with them since I was a youngster..and never will again! Dump corrupt banks, maybe the others will take note!
Posted by: desert dweller | October 4, 2011, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Durbin, your first name says everything about you.
Posted by: cynthia bloemer | October 4, 2011, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
PEOPLE OF THE USA. The BIGGEST issue we face is ending a corrupt ponzi scheme called the Federal Reserve. The Fed IS a privately owned bank that profits off of our debt. This ponzi scheme was set up by bankers in 1913. Do your research! These crooks are intentionally destroying our dollar and economy, so their buddies at the IMF can promote a new world currency. Both parties are owned by this this banking cartel. The Fed is creating massive inflation by printing our dollar into oblivion. They are doing this to keep their financial Ponzi scheme afloat. Our society is doomed, since our education system is rigged (via the NEA and media) to dumb down the populous about the real power brokers of corruption in our world like the UN, Federal Reserve, IMF, World Bank, WTO, etc… With the help of Obama and Bush, your pockets are getting picked. End the Federal Reserve. Ron Paul 2012!!!
Posted by: Dialogos | October 4, 2011, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Looks like we joe taxpayer does have to make up for everything the congress and banks do.
Posted by: Nancy | October 4, 2011, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
What an idiot.
Posted by: Dennis in WV | October 4, 2011, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Another reason to repeal the Dodd/Frank Bill!
Posted by: Jane | October 4, 2011, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Durbin didn’t go far enough. Folks with IRAs, CDs and structured investments should also bail the hell out. BoA is undercapitalized, overleveraged and heavily exposed to European debt. It’s derivative and swap exposure alone is over $30,000,000,000,000. Don’t be the last sucker standing in line at the empty ATM machine!
Posted by: Shawn | October 4, 2011, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Dodd/Frank Bill forces expenses for banks to go higher. In return, banks, just like any other business, will pass the cost on to the consumer. They could close branches and lay off workers or they can raise prices which is what BofA is doing. Some banks are closing branches.
This is Durbin’s fault as it’s his amendment that pertains to debit card transaction fees. These idiots who’ve never run a business have no idea what they are doing when they pass legislation.
Posted by: John | October 4, 2011, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Amazing that this clown who brought this on now wants to decimate another business he hasn’t already ruined. Kind of like Dodd who co-sponsored the bill with Frank to plunder the housing market into the disaster it is today and then he walks off into the sunset. What a loser.
Posted by: Mark | October 4, 2011, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Remember when banks wanted you to use debit cards and atm’s, because they said it was cheaper than paying for bank tellers?
Posted by: Mark | October 4, 2011, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Durbin and other elected Democrat officials think we are so stupid that we don’t know it was DURBIN-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act…..Consumer Protection my azz, with help from the entire Democrat party, Pelosi, Reid, Obama and the Marxist behind the scenes Soros that is the cause of passing this cost and others coming down the pike to the consumer? Durbin-Dodd increases the reporting requirements of investment advisors, and limits the ability of these advisors to exclude information in reporting to the various Federal government agencies. However, there is an exemption in reporting for Venture Capital Fund Advisors….and who would that be? OH, I THINK THAT’S GEORGE SOROS……We don’t need conspiracy theories when there’s a conspiracy staring at us right in the face. They are still writing subprime loans too. Remember the hated Goldman Sachs and how they helped bring down our entire financial system? Well, this administration has nobody but Goldman Sachs former employees working all over this administration. And this Dodd-Frank Legislation…by just chance and happenstance lets George Soros off the hook because his is a Venture capital hedgefund…..and Dodd and Frank excuses that type of money making–which hedges bets against America. How about that week war in Libya (now going on since March 11th) that’s costing us $250 million dollars per day…..The O in Obama is a zero, $O, OOO,OOO,OOO,OOO,OOO,OOO,OOO. If you want to know who Obama is, read about his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham-Soetoro, worked alongside Peter Geithner (the father of Obama’s Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner) creating microcredit and savings programs for the poor in third world countries (Soetoro and Geithner worked together at Women’s World Banking Int’l in New York). What journalists fail to report is that those banks which engaged in Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro’s microfinance/credit principles have all failed–thousands of banks all over third world countries have collapsed due to microfinance principles, and all of those comparatively small but yet precious savings accounts in those banks were wiped out with the failures of those banks, all of those life savings lost. Obama’s mother’s dream (Stanley Ann Dunham @ the Ford Foundation–her microeconomics programs established in 3rd world countries–banking systems all through 3rd world countries used her microcredit programs which led to banks failing thanks to her principles of redistribution of wealth–aka subprime lending–she developed a model of microfinance which was a world leader in micro-credit systems. What they do not tell you is that the biggest fail was the Indonesian banking system (her pet program) which had to restructure their entire banking system after it failed thanks to her microcredit policies. The ‘in charge’ are rapidly pushing us over a cliff…Stock up on food and buy silver and gold, but it must be physical gold, you need it in your own hands, not in a retirement portfolio.
Posted by: klg1956 | October 4, 2011, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
I would change banks if i used a debit card that was going to get assessed the charge – but since I’m a Republican I don’t need a Senator to tell me what I need to do in order for me to take action.
Posted by: Colorado_Man | October 4, 2011, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
This is what the public gets when big government decides how much business is allowed to charge for services or how much individuals are allowed to make or any number of other dimwit regulations the elitists in Washington impose on the peons that are the constituency.
Posted by: Roger | October 4, 2011, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Whatever national bank they take their money to will eventually be forced to impose the same fees, and as taxable revenues shrink, credit unions and community banks will be in the cross-hairs.
Posted by: Giuseppe in Stati Uniti | October 4, 2011, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Come on, DICK:
First the Feds force BoA to merge with Merrill Lynch, swallow the balance of Countrywide and to take TARP money, then they want to put you out of business. After three straight quarters of negative earnings, what’s the bank to do? I only wish it were as easy to put you out of business.
Posted by: Mike | October 4, 2011, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
This whole thing is delightfully delicious. Durbin imposes the amendment in the Dodd-Frank law. Bank of America is a huge Democratic political contributor. Warren Buffett just sank $5B into the bank. The Democrats just threw a few loyal supporters under the bus.
Why doesn’t Congress just eliminate this, like the stupid 1099 requirement under the health care law?
Posted by: djaymick | October 4, 2011, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
What is a bank supposed to do? The federal reserve has interest rates so slow that there is absolutely no incentive to put money into savings accounts or CDs. The only way to raise revenue is to issue fees which every bank is having to do. The fed needs to raise interest rates and stop giving people a reason to stick their money in gold which does absolutely nothing for anyone. Higher deposits will translate into less fees and more loans for business growth. THAT is where job creation happens.
Posted by: CSD | October 4, 2011, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Dodd/Frank takes the $30 overdraft fee away from those who can’t keep track of their money. So now everyone gets his by a $5 atm fee. That’s what Democrats call fair. What’;s outrageous is the Democrats and Durbins stupidity.
Posted by: jschmidt | October 4, 2011, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
While I agree, in a free market, customers get to vote with their feet…the gall of the person responsible for the hike showing outrage is rediculous. This is the Durbin Frank Dodd Debit Fee. If you don’t like it, get rid of them. Your other option is to go to another bank that passes the cost on to you in a less invasive manner. The fact of the matter is, no service is free. You are paying for it one way or the other. Either in higher prices at the store, or higher fees on your card. I personally don’t like the government taking away a businesses right to choose which way to charge a customer for a service because it is arbitrary, versus customer focused. The free market takes care of itself in that sense. If you want real regulation, businesses should stop taking the higher fee ATM cards like some don’t take Discover card. Then people will have the choice to side with the bank or the vendor in turn bringing down the fees.
Posted by: Jason | October 4, 2011, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
This problem was created because our wicked political leaders allowed all these bank mergers after the banks promised consumers would benefit from economies of scale. The only thing that happened is CEO compensation increased 1,000%. The big banks and liberals in Congress created the economic mess we are currently in. George Bush’s contribution was that he allowed it to happen because he is big government RINO. The big banks want to crush the small banks and eliminate all competition. The liberals want to redistribute wealth by forcing the banking system to make stupidly risky loans. Liberals publicly attack the big banks and privately they are married to each other. Wall Street is full of big money, big government liberals. The Obama administration is full of Wall Street liberals. The big banks got bailed out by taxpayers and the Fed, and the small banks and consumers get punished by Chicago style crony capitalism. The bankers get rich and the liberals get to blame capitalism for all the country’s ills. It is a win, win for these people.
Posted by: Doug Lynn | October 4, 2011, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
This bill will cause the big banks to lose consumers and small banks to lose businesses. In the end the small banks will fail and the big banks will thrive. Dodd Frank is a horrible law and needs to be appealed.
Posted by: Gunny | October 4, 2011, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Mission Accomplished, Durbin!
The Democrat Party War on the American Economy continues to be enormously successful!
Posted by: Ed | October 4, 2011, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Congress needs to quit messing with capitalism and let it work. If banks charge too much, other banks will charge less and get their business. Price fixing by the govt never works.
Posted by: Gunny | October 4, 2011, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
BAC – is a financial terrorist organization. nuff said. nice to see someone start talking some sense.
Power of the people. Together we stand – divided we fall. Support your local bank!
Posted by: Jonny | October 4, 2011, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
The article was misleading in that it did not mention that the law only applies to large banks and not small banks.
Posted by: Gunny | October 4, 2011, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
I will gladly pay this fee. In fact I think that I (and my rich cronies) should pay $25 a month or more. It’s only fair that I pay more than my Secretary!
Posted by: Warren Buffet | October 4, 2011, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
You were always paying 5 dollars to use your card. Previously it was in the price of the purchases since the business had to pay the charge.
Even people who alwayss paid in cash and didn’t have a bank card still had to pay increased prices to pay for service for those that did.
YOU are paying for YOUR service and always havve been, The difference is now others don’t have to pay for your service
Posted by: BAalan | October 4, 2011, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Typical lib….no clue as to how a free market works. Did you think BofA would just eat that cost and not pass it along to the consumer like any other business would do??? What happened is Durban thought he would make a few points with his constituents by tossing in a stupid ammendment at the very end that would cap these fees and make him a hero. Now that it’s backfired, it CYA time and he’s acting like an indignant fool. Reminds me of the kid who wasted his parents and then begs the judge for leniency because he’s an orphan.
Posted by: TexasRick | October 4, 2011, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
The Democrats, the Party of Unintended Consequences
Posted by: Jack | October 4, 2011, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Competition is a wonderful thing! It is unbridled capitalism at its best. I had an account with BofA over a decade ago and they started hitting us with fees left and right, so I left and went to Washington Mutual. WaMu was a great bank for many years until Chase took over, so I switched to Wells Fargo and have been very happy with them. Switching over bill pay services is a pain, but in some cases worth it. If the bank is nickle and diming you, switch to another. I also have an account with a credit union that I could jump into if Wells Fargo starts going fee crazy. For once, I fully agree with Durbin. The man is spot on! I’m surprised BofA is still in business with the stuff they have pulled over the years.
Posted by: Marvin | October 4, 2011, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
I was a Bank of America business customer for 21 years and put up with way too much from them during that time. The way they screwed me over two weeks ago was the last straw. A larger transaction went through that was not supposed to and put me negative. Four transactions posted that night. The large one that caused the problem and three little $10 transactions. If they had processed the three small ones first, there would have been funds to cover them, but, they did the large one first which then placed a $35 charge on all four transactions for a total penalty fee of $140. Their explanation? They always process the largest first. I told them of course you do. It’s a cash machine for you. This bank is a total rip-off. I have now opened an account with U.S. Bank and have told B of A to shove it. This happened before I even heard of this $5 rip-off.
Posted by: Ralloh | October 4, 2011, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
At least we can rest easy that since Durbin’s ammendment passed, the prices of products at our shopping venues will go down since they no longer have to pay that $.20/transaction. I’m sure Dick was thinking of the consumer when he bent over for the lobbyist… I mean middle class citizens.
This is the perfect example of why government needs to get out of the way. Quit regulating stuff and quit trying to CONTROL everything. Let suppliers and consumers figure out the winners and losers.
PS – Shut up, Richard!
Posted by: JMJ | October 4, 2011, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
This is not the guy next door, saying this.
An Elected Official telling Americans to go against the bank. Is not he suppose to be for the success of his country. PS. he was the one who passed the Durban law, now the banks are increasing their fees to make up for what he has done.
Posted by: firedup49 | October 4, 2011, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Does anyone else here know someone that works at BOA? I do. People work at that bank, Mr. Durbin. Is your goal to cost them their jobs? Seems like reckless language to me. This man represents the government not the people. That’s what’s backwards about our system. These guys no longer represent us. They represent themselves. This is why they fear elections.
Posted by: John | October 4, 2011, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
There will probably not be a run on BOA but wait until you see the run at the pollls when you are up for election. We will not forget the Durbin Fee – we will be reminded every month.
Posted by: Logo4245 | October 4, 2011, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
All of this is that idiot Durbum’s fault in the first place. The banks just passed this to the consumer. Morons.
Posted by: Bob | October 4, 2011, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
“What a STUPID irresponsible thing to say!!!! Run that bank and not only will people lose their money it will start a chain reaction that will send this economy into free fall….seriously how stupid can one person be”
this has been their intent all along. Collapse America.
Posted by: Siggy | October 4, 2011, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
“I just don’t get why republicans seem to believe banks should get to do whatever they wish.” I just don’t get why Dems don’t get the free market. If you don’t like what one bank is doing, go to another one. If they are all doing the same thing and the public is angry then a new bank will soon open to give the public what it wants. That bank will prosper until the other banks come to their senses and adopt better practices. This system works WAY better than congressional meddling ever has or ever will.
Posted by: shawn | October 4, 2011, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
If the government is going to regulate or charge banks more, the consumer will have to make it up by paying more…
.In business if the government is going to raise my taxes I will have to charge more to make it up by increasing my prices…
Posted by: firedup49 | October 4, 2011, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
A little over a year ago, my wife and I (and her business) closed all our accounts with BOA. The mortage, the second mortage, our savings accounts, credit cards, checking accounts, CD’s, business credit account, business loans…….he whole kit and kabootle. We never looked back. We couldn’t do it all at once but every few days or week so, we’d go in and close another account. They wanted to know why we were closing all our accounts. We told them that we no longer considered them to be running an ethical business and we did not want to do business with them. We yanked about a millioin dollars out and an untold loss of future business for BOA. I hope they go bankrupt.
Posted by: William | October 4, 2011, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Did pandoras box just get opened here? Talk about getting into foreign territory. An elected official throwing a publicly held company under the bus while at the same time instructing consumers to go elsewhere. I can’t stand BofA, and while his statement is very true, what are the implications of an elected official making such a statement?
Has anyone throught about this?
Posted by: Seeker | October 4, 2011, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
The bank claims that the move is in response to a pretty big anticipated loss in profit as a result of the so-called “Durbin Amendment.” The Durbin Amendment is an add-on to the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law No. 111-203), signed into law by President Barack Obama on July 21, 2010. The Act was meant to protect us from all of those banks that were too big to fail – you know, the whole banking/financial sector meltdown that we just lived through.
The Durbin Amendment, named after Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), was added to the bill after flopping around for the better part of a year. The law applies to those big banks – the ones over $10 billion in assets – and was ostensibly passed as an effort to increase competition. It was supposed to be pro-consumer.
But here’s the kicker: the Amendment gave the Federal Reserve the power to regulate debit card interchange fees and other bits of banking admin, which they’ve done. Over the summer, the Fed released the final rule on the matter. The combination of fees, restrictions and caps is thought to cost banks subject to the amendment nearly $14 billion annually.
— From Forbes online
Posted by: Nigel | October 4, 2011, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
This is gross malfeasance of office – inciting against an American business. Durbin should be publicly caned and put in stocks in the public square as a warning to all politicians who abuse their office.
Posted by: JLin | October 4, 2011, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Wake Up !!
I’m no fan of BofA, but Why do you think Dodd’s saying Bail on the bank??
It’s because HE CAUSED THIS… It was HIS Rider to the Dodd-Frank Bill which caused this mess.
Now he wants to make the bank fail (and with it the economy).
Liberals may have the best intentions — But Can you see how dangerous and reckless they are?
Plus he’s from ILLINOIS. No doubt familiar with ‘Chicago Politics.’… Do you get the Picture?
Posted by: A.J. | October 4, 2011, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Just walk away from the Democratic Party.
I did and won’t come back until they rid
themselves of all the reckless, arrogant moron
that are wreaking havoc on the economy.
Posted by: Edword | October 4, 2011, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Apparently Sen. Durbin is copying Gov. Christie’s advice to “get the heck out of the water”.
Posted by: Joseph Grcar | October 4, 2011, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
The Federal Government is just a tool. In good hands it can do good. In evil hands it can be the source of awful hardship and tyranny. Under the administration of Obama and the Democrats the Federal Government itself has become the greatest threat that America has to face, and is her greatest enemy now. The States need to develop a plan with the Pentagon because we are about to have a popular revolution against this Marxist-ruled government. Enough is enough.
Posted by: JLin | October 4, 2011, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Chase bank and many others charge a 5-7 dollar fee per month for a debit card if you don’t use it. You have to make several purchases a month to waive the fee. What’s the difference between them and BOA. They are also charging a fee while trying to dictate to the customer what their spending habits shoud be.
Posted by: oro | October 4, 2011, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
I use BoA and have never had a debit card. They are evil. Use a credit card.
Posted by: frank | October 4, 2011, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
It costs a bank about $2.95 to process a check — starting writing checks instead of using the debit card. Then B of A, Wells Fargo et al will begin charging for each check written.
Unintendend consequences created by a moronic legislative branch.
CREDIT UNION PEOPLE
Posted by: 3eyedjohnny | October 4, 2011, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Like others, I quit BoA two years ago when they were handing out loans and free credit cards to illegal aliens here in North Texas. I’ve never been impressed with Bank of Un-America since that moment, but strictly in a business perspective, this new debit card fee is not their faul.
Basically, Dodd-Frank (with the hypocrite Durbin’s support) is the culprit. Free Economics lesson 101 right here —-> COMPANIES DO NOT PAY TAXES. Who does? That’s right – us. So when regulators pass taxes to companies, it’s not hard to see where they will come from – our pockets!
Reduce the bank’s ability to collect swipe fee from 44 cents to 24 cents and they have to make it up somewhere. And wow, where is the reporting on the real reasons that their web site is “down” for four days? Something smells there, a major corporation has the technical resources to keep up a site, even with “traffic” – someone is lying a bit here.
Posted by: NewFADS | October 4, 2011, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
What an idiot this liberal hack is….. This fee the bank is tacking on is because of this man!! No wonder the fee is now being called the “DURBIN TAX” Vote every DEM out of office next November!
Posted by: gary | October 4, 2011, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Dodd and Frank as in Chris and Barney are responsible for the housing crash. They forced the lenders to take on mortgages that the people could not qualify or pay for and when Dodd and Frank got the bucks they wanted for their friends and themselves the bottom fell out. Isn’t it nice to know these two scumbags are the main reason you are out of a job. Then obozo the clown was elected and the problem became worse. How much more can we take of these crooks?????? Oh by the way remember Bush warned the congress their policies were going bite us in the butt. The warning is on YouTube.
Posted by: circle8 | October 4, 2011, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Yes, SEEKER “Did pandoras box just get opened here?” This is nuts. Is this America????
Posted by: John | October 4, 2011, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Three cheers for Bank of America! A for-profit business taking action to make sure it remains profitable and willing to accept the consequences for its decisions. Don’t see Durbin accepting any consequences for his previous poor decisions. If he ran BoA, he’d let you withdraw $2 for each $1 you deposited and then ask, “which floor has our printing press to print more money?”
Posted by: Steve Tees | October 4, 2011, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
For all you outraged over this just stop using the bank then. They can charge any fee they want. Its their bank not yours. They are not a charity. They debit card fee was a way for them to not lay off another 30k people. All I know is banking was cheaper before the government got involved. A few years ago checking was free most services were free and banks were competing for your business. Then the government fixed it.
Posted by: Someone | October 4, 2011, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Durbin and his congressional thugs in large part caused these fees to happen by restricted other aspects of banking and now he says something like this. He is the epitomy of irresponsibility. And stupidity.
Posted by: AnneP | October 4, 2011, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
This is beyond comprehension. Frank, Dodd and Durbin made the rules knowing full well what the consequences were going to be. When the housing bubble burst, Frank & Dodd has the nerve to go on TV and blame regulation. Umm, regulation they sponsored. Now Durbin goes on TV and blames the banks for reaction to his legislation. This is so absurd that it has to be a part of the plan to take the US down. To have a member of congress go after the largest bank, which is also in steep, deep trouble, one can only conclude this is purposeful action and has been all along. People are now beginning to realize what this administration is doing to our Country. It would be impossible to explain this craziness any other way.
Posted by: Sandy | October 4, 2011, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Wait, isn’t this Senator Durbin really saying that market forces will regulate the fees??? Isn’t that what Republicans have been saying all along??? What, is this guy an IDIOT???
Posted by: Eric | October 4, 2011, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Anyone that still has money in BofA, is a moron and desreves what they get.
Posted by: BUNNY | October 4, 2011, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Glad to see Americans getting pissed on both sides of the fence. Not such a bunch of dummies afterall eh. Everyone starting to look learn and pay attention. Good. Get rid of the crooks from both sides of the House and Senate!
Posted by: Backwater | October 4, 2011, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Wow. Is there anyone left that is not convinced that the Democrats are DELIBERATELY trying to crash our economy? This is absolutely unbelievable. A US Senator is attempting to deliberately and willfully destroy a major bank. He is literally attacking our country.
Posted by: Cass | October 4, 2011, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Wow.. Sounds like we have another Democrat politician using a Marxist tactic.. Blame someone else for a problem which you’ve caused.. Durbin should be impeached his treasonous behavior. Just like 0bama, he seeks to overthrow our free-market, capitalist Republic. Go to hell, Durbin.
Posted by: David | October 4, 2011, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Consider Illinois’s fiscal condition and you get an idea of Dick Durbin’s competence. I hope he keeps this rhetoric up. His position is untenable. He is responsible for this BoA debacle. No one else.
Posted by: EX_CHICAGOAN | October 4, 2011, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
What a tool! Let’s call for a run on Durbin and see how he likes it. It would be nice to see a very large crowd gather at his home and demand he step down for his stupidity, he is the one that caused the fees in the first place.
Posted by: Jim | October 4, 2011, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Fight back before it’s all gone. This isn’t a movie, people. The stakes are real.
Posted by: wakeup | October 4, 2011, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Prior to Durbin’s add on amendment to the Frank Dodd bill, the merchant paid the interchange fee to the banks. It was simple. The merchant didn’t have to pay the interchange fee. They could elect not to pay the fee but of course that meant they could not accept the card. If the merchant wanted the business, they paid the fee and accepted the card. Then Durbin and our government decides to get involved. Durbin’s little amendment cost the banks $14 billion annually that was being paid by the merchant. Of course, any business is going to try and recoup that amount of lost revenue. Thus the consumer debit card fee that they will ALL be charging soon. Get off B of A’s back. At least they had the balls to come out and tell you what they were doing. The others, who have the same plans, have kept quiet. How about screaming about the merchant who has less cost yet has failed to reduce the price of their goods? This is what happens when the government tries to dictate to the private sector. Get out where you do not belong! Finally, this had nothing to do with consumer protection. Durbin, the live long politicia,n knew this would happen when the amendment was added. My question to Durbin is who were you paying favors too when this was added?
Posted by: Donna | October 4, 2011, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
let me get this straight…the government taxes the bejeesus out of you, gas tax ,property tax, sales tax, income tax,auot tax etc and yet youre up in arms about a $5 fee by a private company?
get real folks
Posted by: lockj | October 4, 2011, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
I agree with Dickie Durbin. People should vote with their feet. #1 Leave Illinois the most corrupt city in the Country. #2 Vote Dick Durbin out of office. These imbaciles pass laws thinking they are going to make life miserable for business and still just don’t get it that everything they wack business with, eventually gets paid for by John Q. Taxpayer.
Posted by: GarySellersville | October 4, 2011, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
agree with Dickie Durbin. People should vote with their feet. #1 Leave Illinois the most corrupt state in the Country. #2 Vote Dick Durbin out of office. These imbaciles pass laws thinking they are going to make life miserable for business and still just don’t get it that everything they wack business with, eventually gets paid for by John Q. Taxpayer.
Posted by: GarySellersville | October 4, 2011, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Why do people even live in Illinois? What a heap of human trash it is.
Posted by: Illisright | October 4, 2011, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Dick “Cabeza” Durbin is right in there with at mix that is writing the “as you go” bill by Dodd and Frank that allowed this kind of theft by banks to occur..more special interest spin-offs by deemer crooks.
Posted by: ONTIME | October 4, 2011, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
What a fool – telling Americans to leave a bank because of a fee. They all charge huge fees – but Congress has the power to regulate. Good old little Dicky!
Posted by: B. Samuel Davis | October 4, 2011, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
I’ve been with a credit union for many years. Private banks are the greed infested swine houses.
Posted by: Xman | October 4, 2011, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
If you can recall, it was this same dimwit, Durbin, who so famously started the run in 2008. The entire collapse came from a lot f variables but it was his statement that was the straw that broke the camels back.
For those of you who were wondering, this is further proof of their stupidity on economic matters and why we need to get them out of office. The left creates high gas prices causing people to have to choose between mortgage or getting to work. Then they start runs on financial institutions to get the ball rolling the way they want it too. This time around, they resort to dirty dog Durbin to start it all again.
Posted by: Bob | October 4, 2011, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Mr. Durbin how about your 1% tax on all bank transactions? At what point are we the people to tell you the government enough? POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK!!!!
Posted by: Carson | October 4, 2011, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
The DNC is the greed infested swine house. They take all the money and give it to their friends. Who blow it. It’s so cool. Screw everyone else.
Posted by: xployed | October 4, 2011, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
I just don’t get why republicans seem to believe banks should get to do whatever they wish. Posted by: THOMAS | October 3, 2011, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
————————————————————————————————————-
Still don’t get it do you? All the government interference caused this. The Democrats OWN this fee.
Posted by: EllieEnlightened | October 4, 2011, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
I cannot believe that Dick Durbin is telling me where to bank. I really can’t believe it.
Posted by: Jason | October 4, 2011, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Hey Dick, just curious: which bank do you own stock in? (bet it’s a competitor.)
Posted by: followthemoney | October 4, 2011, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
A Democrat scolding a bank? The NERVE.
Posted by: lookingforlightning | October 4, 2011, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
How about BofA sending a note to all their IL customers:
”
Tired of High IL Taxes, moved to the South, and tell Durbin goodbye. Or if you cannot move, vote Durbin goodbye.”
Would be great payback to Dick
Posted by: ColeNC | October 4, 2011, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Typical of a liberal politician.
Posted by: Stan | October 4, 2011, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
First time I agree with a dem. BA is a sleeze organization. They bought a boat loan I had and tried to change the payment schedule to screw me out of the interest I had agreed to on the previous loan. I told them they couldn’t pull that crap in the state I lived in and got another loan to pay that loan off and cut then off completely. totally unscrupulous
Posted by: Derty Ernie | October 4, 2011, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Would love to ask B of A how much money they were going to give to the Dems this year and then tell them why not just shut it down and turn it over and save some time.
Posted by: votingcows | October 4, 2011, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
This sounds all to familiar like when Chuck Schumer caused a run on Indymac Bank
Posted by: Ackston | October 4, 2011, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
What is sad is so many people don’t understand what actually happened.
The merchants were paying this fee… the all knowing government nanny came in to “HELP” us and told them they couldn’t charge that much.
So now they have to re-coup costs so it gets shifted to WHO? THE CONSUMER.
Thank you oh great government for “helping” me.
The cost of doing business doesn’t go down because this moron says so…
Many jobs have already been lost due to branches closing and we’ll see more of it all becauseof the HELP our government has given us.
GET THE FACTS.
Bank of America is not the enemy here — horrible government legislation is.
Posted by: Marc M | October 4, 2011, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Yes. Everyone listen to financial advice from those geniuses, the Democrats. They are so good with money.
Posted by: mmhmm | October 4, 2011, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
This is ALMOST as hilarious as Democrats belittling HMOS and insurance companies! Know who proposed the law to CREATE HMOs? That was Sen. Ted Kennedy back in 1974! Democrats are some of the DUMBEST people around. It’s amazing they can function and walk. They remind me of the ‘Spock Brain’ episode, an empty husk of a body with NO brain! (Voting for Obama was further proof of this concept…)
Posted by: DumbDemocrats | October 4, 2011, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
the rich! the rich! TWEET! the rich! the rich! TWEET!
Posted by: Pollysparlourtrick | October 4, 2011, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
These statements perfectly illustrate the mindset of not only Durbin but pretty much the entire Democrat party. He sincerely believes that without his sagely advice to make a run on the banks, Americans would simply be too stupid to take their business elsewhere in response to fees they considered excessive. It’s exactly the same nanny logic that gave life these boneheaded regulations in the first place. Durbin saw economic activity taking place amongst mutually consenting parties and figured that somebody among them absolutely must have been getting stiffed and was in need of benevolent government protection. Now we see the sad yet completely predictable results. Tell me, Dick – when will you learn to stop sticking your nose where it doesn’t belong? It’s become rather tedious.
Posted by: Michael | October 4, 2011, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
You know what? Liberals are downers. They are the “everything and everyone sucks” people. Never-ending complaints. It’s all bad news and we’re all going to die and it’s all our fault. I just don’t care to be around all their negative energy anymore. Go be all offended and doomed elsewhere.
Posted by: niceday | October 4, 2011, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Maybe a lawsuit should be filed against Durbin by shareholders (check your 401K…you are probably a shareholder)…..Durbin is a complete maniac. I just wonder what it is that Bank of America has refused to do to please these loons. The Democrats are mad at them for some reason and it’s not because they think they are ripping off the consumer.
Posted by: Sharon | October 4, 2011, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
I travel extensively, and Bank of America was the only bank I could find EVERYWHERE. I used them in Savannah, San Luis Obispo, Jackson and every big city and small village in between.
I was able to withdraw GBP from Lloyds London or Australian dollars from NAB WITHOUT PAYING A SINGLE WITHDRAW FEE. The list of banks you can withdraw from internationally is great, and the access to banks in the United States is unparalleled.
Of course, this is going to trickle through all banks, not just BoA as well, but BoA offered such great advantages to people who traveled extensively.
I do believe their fees are frustrating – I had having to use the ATM when sometimes I would prefer to go straight to a teller. I don’t want to pay to reorder checks. But, that is the account I signed up for, and I get it.
My biggest question is… Doesn’t the government know that the recession was caused by banks extending loans they could not pay off??? It had NOTHING to do with transaction fees being charged to retailers. What was the point of this law?!
Posted by: Angie | October 4, 2011, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
BofA is merely compensating for the new debit fee structure dictated by Dodd-Frank. You were paying it indirectly before anyways — stores charged higher prices to compensate for the older, higher transaction fees. Stop using debit and credit and all your fees will go down, and store prices will fall a little too.
Posted by: LR | October 4, 2011, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Does the name Dodd/frank ring a bell?
Posted by: dennis | October 4, 2011, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Well, if my bank follows the Bank of America’s example, I guess this old lady will have to limp into her nearest bank and withdrawn all of her small Social Security Disability check each month while leaving one dollar in the account for the bank to loan out, tripled that dollar, into their banking schemes. I didn’t work all my adult life and now am dying from Parkinson disease for some Banksters to get rich off of me from their ridiculous fees. I wonder if they even know what going hungry feels like.
Posted by: Rose | October 4, 2011, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
“Big” Dick Durbin is an embarrassment to Congress and this country. But he’s only a symptom of the problem, the real problem is the delusional liberal idiots in Chicago and elsewhere who vote for this guy and those in league with him.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger | October 4, 2011, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Is this the kind of action that Warren Buffett approved of before agreeing to invest his money in August?
They need to pay upper management less and quit writing contracts for employees with enormous exit clauses – 90 days severance tops, not renew all those internet domain names they purchased last year, up the rent on all the offices in the buildings they own across America that have the BofA name attached. This would help them to balance their books.
Posted by: TJ | October 4, 2011, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Calling for a run on a bank? Isn’t that tantamount to yelling “FIRE!” in a theater?
Posted by: Ben Dover | October 4, 2011, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Before, the merchant was bearing the cost. Now YOU are. Thanks to Obama, Pelosi,. Reid and DURBIN.
Uhhh, noooo. You were always paying, now you know how much you’re paying.
Posted by: Vegas Vic | October 4, 2011, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Irresponsible arrogant asshole.
Posted by: GRP1953 | October 4, 2011, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Working on it.
My college has a credit union. I JUST applied!!!
Posted by: blewvelvet | October 4, 2011, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Democrats want to destroy this country by any means necessary. If there were a run on this “too big to fail” bank, then it would devastate our economy! He needs to shut the hell up!
Posted by: Jonathan | October 4, 2011, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Only in The United States can a congressman make a law that directly affects said bank, then the same congressman tells people: “Bank of America customers, vote with your feet, get the heck out of that bank,” Hypocrisy much?
Posted by: midnight | October 4, 2011, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
It’s amazing, the level of basic economic ignorance in this country. I’m a merchant and we don’t eat these fees, we try to pass them on to the consumer or we go out of business. When government says they are going to tax a business they are actually taxing the end consumer, you ‘NEED” to understand this. Why do you think it costs $1.89 for a bottle of pop at your local ‘stop & shop’? You have to pay for the ‘dufus’ putting his candy bar on his credit card and all the fees for doing that. ‘WAKE UP AMERICA’ the vast majority of us are ‘USEFUL TOOLS’ and we don’t even know it.
Posted by: snupedoug | October 4, 2011, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Sounds like Mr Durbin is calling for a run on a bank. I say we take him up on it. Enough already. No more fees, no more tricks, no more fine print.. stop scamming and END this bank being abusive.
Posted by: Eek | October 4, 2011, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Not that I have any love for Bank of America, but isn’t it a crime to cause a run on the bank? Like yelling fire in a movie theatre. Of course, Durbin(and others) gave the Federal Reserve permission to print Trillions and give it to the big banks to keep them solvent (especiall BoA), so end the end it don’t matter
Posted by: Brad Sutton | October 4, 2011, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
This guy has no problem raising taxes to pay for pet projects, but let the bank charge $5 and he wants to effectively shut it down. DEMOCRATS are what is wrong with America!
Posted by: Brian | October 4, 2011, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
Blaming Durbin because BOA is now gouging its customers ??!! It’s about darn time someone stood up against the evil, profiteering corporate mega-rapists. First they were screwing the small merchants and now they want to screw people just to use their own money. Sell your stock, Warren. You are too good to be involved with bunch of usurers.
Posted by: EmersonBiggins | October 4, 2011, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
This is the kind of coersion that forced banks to lower their lending standards to give loans to people who could not repay them. Do you realize that BofA refused to take bailout monies? They said. “we don’t need it”. But the government said take it, or else! You see if the largest bank didn’t “need” the money, the government would not have been in control of the banking system. BofA even tried to pay off the loan early and Obama said, “Don’t you dare!” But BofA did pay off the loan. Now, you see retribution.
Posted by: tiki886 | October 4, 2011, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Guaranteed Durbin will be fingered for something within a week, the information mercenaries are digging, fabricating and scheming to rid this guy, the last guy that spoke out against this Bank lasted 2 days. I’d rather have the US government coming after me than the private complex, especially BofA, Assange figured that out quickly.
Posted by: Mike | October 4, 2011, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
You would think these Dems would learn about the law of unintended consequences after some of their other boneheaded laws. Remember when they came up with the luxury tax?? Slapped 10% on expensive cars, boats and planes. Within months the boat building industry was laying off people by the tens of thousands and so did car dealers and plane makers. Yep, that one really worked out well for them didn’t it?
Posted by: Majric | October 4, 2011, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
If it ain’t broke, government will still try to fix it – and cause a bigger problem. Durbin is such a joke.
Posted by: Dan in GA | October 4, 2011, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
I love Durbin
Posted by: Frank | October 4, 2011, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
I was in the banking business for 35 years. If anyone else but a dumbocrat senator encouraged a run on a bank, they would be prosecuted and thrown in jail. The dumb Durban is just p i s s ed that BoA reacted in a business like way to his idiotic new regulation. Durban forced this extra expense on the consumer and is now trying to place the blame on BoA. Politics is for fools!
Posted by: haveyounoshame | October 4, 2011, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Why should banks not be allowed to charge for the services that they provide? Are some of you stupid enough to believe that there is no cost related to providing debit cards? How remarkably uninformed and brainwashed can you be?
Posted by: Joe | October 4, 2011, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Oh god, are you people insane? He didn’t order anyone to leave BOA. He said that if you’re unhappy about it, take your business elsewhere. You already do that with restaurants, retailers, insurance companies, lawyers, and anywhere else you spend your money. But you get offended when someone tells you to basically use common sense and do what you’d normally do when you’re unhappy with something?
This legislation is something that needed to happen. Banks make millions off of your deposits by using it to back loans they make to other customers. On top of that, they want to charge YOU for using your own money. If they don’t charge you, they’ll charge the retailers who will either jack up their prices, or simply not allow you to use debit cards (there’s already one store chain that I am aware of that does this for this exact reason). Either way, you’d end up paying for it.
The first time in at least the past two decades that the government actually does something that benefits us, and people get their knickers in a knot. I just don’t get it.
Posted by: AmericaThePitiful | October 4, 2011, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
The unmitigated gall of this man is boundless. This is the most direct, most obvious, most clear example of the consequences of government interference in the free market. IF any further proof is need that gov’t needs to stay out of the private market, this is it. Doesn’t take a genius to see the cause and effect.
Attention voters: This is what DEMOCRATS major in: dictating how we all shall live. Durbin owns stock in BB&T, I’d say. This is criminal. He should be horsewhipped and dragged through the town square, pissed on by all the townsfolk, and finally ridden out of town on a rail
Posted by: Jack | October 4, 2011, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Democrats are good at this stuff. Remember when Chuck Schumer instigated a run on IndyMac? Either they don’t consider the consequences of what they’re saying before they say it or they fully intend those consequences.
Posted by: SukieTawdry | October 4, 2011, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Why is Durbin so concerned with a $5 fee from Bank of America? Because he know he caused it and is desperate to shift the blame elsewhere. Durbin supported Wal-Mart and other merchants to get “swipe fees” shifted from the merchant to the bank. The bank now has new expenses on debit card transactions and must pass those on to the consumer, who must now pay the Durbin fee.
Posted by: mtbwalt | October 4, 2011, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Durbin (the moderator won’t let us use his first name here) is not the brightest bulb in the box. Standing in front of two former Presidents (Clinton and Bush) Durbin tells a joke about Presidential assassination. No Kidding, it gets better. Durbin reported that Abraham Lincoln must have been Jewish. Because his name was Abraham and (get this!) he was shot in the temple. What a kidder! Dedication of the Abe Lincoln Library in Springfield, Illinois. It’s on tape.
Posted by: Rick | October 4, 2011, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
It is a shame, a real shame that we cannot devise some means to keep Senators at home most of the year. Every thing they do is a disaster for taxpayers!
Posted by: Chuck | October 4, 2011, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
Someone earlier on here asked why Republicans think the banks should do whatever they want. First of all, you DO understand that it is a business, right? They don’t have to provide anything for free. BofA is trying to stay afloat. Granted, some of it is their fault for providing shaky mortgages, but let’s remember it was compounded by the fact that part of their deal for a bail out was that they take a LARGER amount than they needed so the gov’t could make some money off them. Also part of the plan was the purchasing of Countrywide, who would have gone belly up without the buyout. I live in Illinois. Politics here is just embarrassing. Our officials are either in jail, waiting to go to jail, or just plain stupid. We have a large lower income population who tend to believe that they will get “Obama money”. I guess they’re products of Arne Duncan’s public schools here. By the way, thanks to the education czar and b-ball buddy of Barry’s, our public school reading test scores haven’t improved in 20 years. I guess the evolution process has stopped for the public school students in Chicago. That explains a lot!!
Posted by: Jenny | October 4, 2011, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Every time the Democratic controlled government blunders into the private sector like the imbeciles they are, it costs the public money. Bank fees, stagflation, healthcare costs, utility costs all rising as these nitwits devalue the dollar and strangle the private sector with new regs and conditions to do business.
Posted by: trajan long | October 5, 2011, 12:01 am 12:01 am
It is beyond me how people in this country can not see the absolute hypocrisy here. Durbin and his cronies forced the banks to stop collecting their fees from ATM machines and other debit card usages, in other words, they thought that they knew how to run the bank better than the bank. Now they want you to boycott the business because it had to make a decision to pass those lost revenues on in the form of monthly service charges. What did they think was going to happen? The tooth fairy was going to come and magically put the money under the bank’s pillow? Are liberals all this dumb? Wake up America, these political hacks are morons.
Posted by: Diego Roswell | October 5, 2011, 12:30 am 12:30 am
Thanks Durbin. Dems just don’t get it.
Posted by: DixTurban | October 5, 2011, 12:31 am 12:31 am
Whatever campaign cash Durbin loses from BoA will be made up for by Home Depot and Walmart, who pushed this through. Now, the customer will take the hit for the Chinese crap they buy, instead of the big box store. Way to stand up for the little guy, dick!
Posted by: Phil | October 5, 2011, 12:36 am 12:36 am
i didnt need him to tell me to get the heck out of BOA,,, out a there a year ago to a credit union.. couldnt be happier…
Posted by: joe | October 5, 2011, 12:44 am 12:44 am
Want to leave BOA, fine. Appreciate your credit union/local bank, great. Frankly, from my personal experience I hate BOA’s customer service/perspective toward retail customers. But none of that has anything to do with how irresponsible it is for a US Senator to encourage a run on a bank.
BOA, as noted somewhere above, basically agreed to become an arm of the federal government during the financial crisis to absorb some of the other failing institutions AFTER BEING HIGHLY PRESSURED BY BERNAKE/GEITHER ET AL to do so. In doing so they were a part of stabilization in 2008.
However the entire mess stemmed from policies democrats pursued related to housing that were a big *part* of the financial crisis in the first place – loans to people who couldn’t pay them.
Then Dodd-Frank with Durbin’s amendment effectively passed fees on to banks who in turn, as businesses always will, passed them on to customers.
Now here we are again with the people who advocated the law in the first place, thinking it would have no consequences, feigning outrage that the bank would pass along the fee. Durbin wrote the legislation that in effect mandated the fee and then pretends to be outraged when it is passed on.
The government can pass laws that force people and businesses to do things. They can’t, at least yet, however control the decisions people make in reaction to those laws and it pisses them off (it pisses Durbin off). Consequently, he urges a run on a business full of tax-paying (not tax-taking) workers in an effort to? Perhaps push more people out of gainful employment and into welfare.
If you can’t see this you need to start over in kindergarten (preferably not in a public school).
Posted by: Joe | October 5, 2011, 2:03 am 2:03 am
Nice smoke screen by Turban Durbin. This Regime’s hatred of banks and passing legislation that forces banks to charge lower fees in some places makes them charge higher fees to make up for the loss. That’s the bottom line here. How about we let free enterprise decide which banks fail? Gee, there’s an idea.
Posted by: KipNoxzema | October 5, 2011, 2:28 am 2:28 am
So now we have a congressman telling consumers what company to stay with or leave? I hope he realizes that other banks are going to charge also, it’s coming and several have said they will. This is what happens in crony capitalism…the politicians extract money from the companies, then they go on and waste a lot of it, send money to those who voted them in, then the company, being a business passes along that extra cost to the consumers (middle/lower classes) in fees and such. So when a politician from either side tells YOU that this is just going to affect the rich, the big corporations, etc. Stand up, write letters and let then know that you know, it’s all going to trickle down to YOU and demand they stay out of it!!! I don’t understand how many times Americans see the same thing happening, how many times the politicians screw you before you understand it is not about the R or the D in front of a politicians name, it’s the fact they are a politician. They are the ones holding you back, creating messes in your life, etc. Nobody in this current crop of Republlican candidates will do much different other than Ron Paul. The reason why big corporations, banks, etc don’t want Ron Paull, the reason why he is not being pushed by the media (and being minimized) is they know that they can control the others, but they cannot ever own Ron Paul. I wish more people on both sides of the D/R false bickering would finally see this.
Posted by: Jack | October 5, 2011, 3:00 am 3:00 am
All of you who are arguing for the banks because they “lost” revenue have been drinking the Kool-Aid. Financial institution’s overhead for a ATM transaction is nominal – the ATM’s make tons of money for the banks and reducing the fee makes sense and perhaps those profits helped them be less overextended on other services. However, my bank has made it clear they will NOT react to these ATM fees, as they have made cuts to other FREE services they were offering from company profits. So, while you may be right in the sense banks are passing on their costs (to maintain record profits) they wouldn’t have to if they exercised better management of their resources.
Posted by: Darwin | October 5, 2011, 3:35 am 3:35 am
“It is hard to believe that a bank would impose such a fee…”
It is hard to believe that you, Dick, of all people, would be so surprised.
Or is it, “It is hard to believe that you Dick–of all people–would be so surprised.”
Or maybe, “It is hard to believe that you, Dick of all people, would be so surprised.”?
I never was much good with punctuation…
Posted by: Common Sense | October 5, 2011, 4:19 am 4:19 am
Can’t “get out of that bank”, thanks to the gov, we’re all in BoA – as are our kids and their kids.
Posted by: egoist | October 5, 2011, 6:00 am 6:00 am
“Find yourself a bank or credit union that won’t gouge you for $5 a month and still will give you a debit card that you can use every single day. What Bank of America has done is an outrage.”
“Rich” or may i call them “job creators” find yourself a country that won’t gouge you unfair taxes. What the democrats are trying to do is an outrage.
Posted by: Leroy | October 5, 2011, 6:44 am 6:44 am
Durbin screwed this up and now he’s trying to wiggle off the hook. Just another example of how an overreaching government just makes things worse every time they “fix” something that isn’t broke.
Posted by: DMetzig | October 5, 2011, 6:55 am 6:55 am
I think the point about all these fees that most of the posters here are missing is that it is the MERCHANTS who were paying this fee until this ammendment went through. They were the ones paying the banks for the priviledge of taking and processing cards from the bank. The Durbin ammendment was designed to help small business by taking this burden off of small businesses across the nation.
Now what’s funny about all this is that Republicans want to help small business, yet they are yelping about this fee affecting THEIR accounts. And it’s the Republicans, when dealing with debt in the government, who insist that cutting costs is the way to deal with cutting debt and absolutely oppose increasing revenue. So why aren’t they squalling when BoA starts ‘raising revenue’ rather than ‘cutting costs’ in response to economic stress?
Why is cutting costs only good for the government and not good for big banking? Why is raising revenue only bad for the government and not bad for big banking? You can’t tell me BoA can’t afford to cut bonuses and perks and compensation. That’s billions of dollars a year. To survive in this economy, I have to cut costs – drastically – and I have to raise additional revenue at least for the time being. Do I sqawk about it to everyone? No — I just get it done. It is what it is.
BoA and big banking have to learn to live in the culture that THEY helped create. It means change. It means adjusting. This is a new era, and if they don’t get it right — well, they deserve to go under.
Posted by: Kat | October 5, 2011, 8:01 am 8:01 am
Hey Durbin, crawl back into your little hole in wretched Chicago. What BoA is doing is LEGAL. Let customer’s make their own decisions. That is what a free market system is designed to do. If customer’s don’t like what a busiiness is doing, they will quit giving business to them. They don’t need political scum like you giving them advice on how to live their lives.
Posted by: Tim | October 5, 2011, 9:12 am 9:12 am
It is the fault of Dick Durbin. He is the one to blame not BOA. This is caused by Durbin’s meddling.
Call his office and complain. Do not blame BOA, it is nnot their fault. Yell at Durbin if you wnat to.
Durbin essentallly tried to start a run on the biggers bank in the country. Durbin should resign, he is to stupid to be a representative.
Posted by: Twistedsis | October 5, 2011, 9:24 am 9:24 am
FACT BANKS HATE POOR PEOPLE..JUST LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE. people who leave 19 dollars in a checking account and then spend 18.75 of that later that day..COST BANKS MONEY. if you think for even a second about the BILLIONS of dollars it costs banks to play with idiots of this caliber..you may understand.
the banks were FORCED TO ALLOW LOOSERS To open checking accounts by the feds. then the banks are FORCED To loan them money. NOw the fed is FORCING the banks to walk away from BILLIONS in bad mortgage loans..
heres an idea…if you liberals think you can do it better…open a bank…
Posted by: art | October 5, 2011, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Time to get educated….The main reason this country is in such a mess is because the republicans, (not the democrats) wanted to enrich their big banker friends on Wall Street by deregulating the banks and repealing the Glass-Steagall Act (repeal legislation was introduced in 1999 by two republicans Phill Gramm and Jim Leach). The repeal enabled commercial lenders such as Citigroup, BOA, and other big banks to underwrite and trade instruments such as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations and establish so-called structured investment vehicles. The Greed grew on Wall Street and spread through out the nation’s banking and mortgage lending industry and the they didn’t care that those CDO’s they were selling to investors and our pension plan trustees were going to go bust because the banks were lending to anybody regardless of their ability to make the loan payments. Regulation helps protect us from the greedy Banksters who gambling with our pension funds and are robbing the working class in America. Bring back the Glass-Steagall Act and end the Fed and place it under the control of the US Treasury.
Posted by: Mark | October 5, 2011, 10:01 am 10:01 am
ever notice hardcore dems have a brain malfunction????????????????
Posted by: just sayin | October 5, 2011, 11:46 am 11:46 am
For once I agree with a democrat. No one is forced to bank with Bank of America. This is the perfect opportunity to thank God that you live under a good ol’ fashioned capitalist system that provides you with plenty of opportunity to choose any bank you want. If you don’t like bank of america’s fees, take your money elsewhere. End of story.
Posted by: karatemom | October 5, 2011, 11:51 am 11:51 am
As an associate for Bank Of America, I take hundreds of calls from concerned customers each day. So far in my experiance, the main concern with people is will the $5.00fee will be per transaction. The answer is no, it is only $5.00 per month. So rest easy.
I find that the very few calls I take are actually about the fee. Why? Because people are starting to wake up and realize that (Ill) Sen Dick Durbin screwed them. People are now starting to shift the blame where it belongs. Not with BofA, but with Durbin.
What Durbin did was simply shift a portion of the operating costs of VISA transactions from the retailers to the consumers. BofA did NOT want to charge this fee, and it is quite evident that their warning to Durbin of this concequense was to protect our CUSTOMERS.
It fell upon deaf ears.
And now his recent battle cry to make a run on the bank, because of a fee this idiot made possible, can cause these institutions to fail, sparking another great depression (running of the banks sparked the first one) is not only irrisponsible, but borderline treason.
His flawed logic is that the savings the merchants will now enjoy will be past along to the consumer. Sure Dirbin, I like to pipe dream too. If you believe that these big box stores like Walmart, Target, Home Depot, are going to pass the savings along to the customer, then I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you dirt cheap.
And even if they DID pass any “savings” along, it would be only pennies at best. But that big glaring $5.00 fee that sticks out like a sore thumb on customers checking statements each month will remind people they saved jack.
In fact, merchants like Home Depot are already bragging to the American public how much of a profit they are going to make as a result of the raping of the American consumer.
So don’t place the blame on BofA, or any other bank. Place the blame squarely at the feet of the person directly responsible for the kidnapping of Abraham Lincoln out of your wallet each month.
That person s Dick Durbin.
And ABC News, since the media loved to bash BofA for this, care to make a news story about the comments here one this blog? Seems to me that 99.99% of the comments are spot on and place the blame directly. The Amrican people are tired of state run media saying. Break out of the box and give the American people the TRUTH,
Posted by: BigJimW | October 6, 2011, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
It’s amazing how many right leaning people responded to this instead of the educated left. We sit on our as*es and say and do NOTHING! Bank of America is on a collision course with insolvency due to their own risky behavior and acquisition of bad debt from other institutions they acquired. We, the taxpayers, paid them once. They now need more money, admittedly due to Durbin et al. legislation. Take note, although Durbin has no right to sabotage the largest bank in America, he is trying to make a point. Glass-Steagall should be in effect AND all banks should return to being private institutions and make money the old fashioned way…BY EARNING IT!!!!
Posted by: Kevin B | October 7, 2011, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Are you freakin’ Dems crazy? Have you forgotten that BofA employs people? Blame yourselves, Dems. You’re the ones that transferred the costs to customers instead of the merchant.
Posted by: TexasRed | October 15, 2011, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Does anyone besides me see the grand irony in this whole affair? They don’t like the way BofA does business, so they’re taking their business elsewhere.
This is the very essence of the Free Market system! Don’t pay for stuff you don’t want! Unfortunately, when it comes to the Bureaucracy, you don’t have that option – they take your money (taxes) whether you want their product (more bureaucracy) or not!
Posted by: Rich Grise | November 5, 2011, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Hi, after reading this awesome article i am also happy to share my experience here with friends.
Posted by: Maybell Medi | February 22, 2012, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Gdiddy license plate auction is final; priciest sale tops $200,000.A few of the most rare state license plates sold in lots for five figures. A set of vintage Idaho plates sold for $26,000, while Arkansas plates fetched $29,900.
Posted by: Massive | May 6, 2012, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm