The Senate’s ‘Nuclear Option’: Has the Upper House Reached a New Low?
The U.S. Senate is often referred to as the world’s greatest deliberative body. But to anyone who caught even a few minutes of Thursday night’s meltdown in the Senate, it would be easy to think otherwise.
The fight – in which Democrats invoked the ‘nuclear option’ and used a simple majority to curb the rights of the supermajority - on one level was about procedure. But years of division and partisanship contributed to emotions and rhetoric that ran high, highlighting that the Upper House in Congress might have, to some, turned into a fun house – more about games than getting things done – more about politics than policy.
“I think members on both sides of the aisle feel like this institution has degraded into a place that is no longer a place of any deliberation at all,” Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., said.
Even Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, whose strategic move Thursday night was described by Republicans as “heavy-handed,” admitted the dysfunction. “This has to come to an end,” Reid said of both sides. “This is not a way to legislate.”
Arcane procedural squabbles aside, the fight was really about politics, both sides casting the other has holding up legislation for political gain, and the minority party in the Senate arguing to protect more of its rights in the chamber.
“Let’s get back to legislating as we did before the mantra around here was ‘defeat Obama,’” a frustrated Reid said on the Senate floor.
Democratic aides consistently point out that Republicans have made no secret that their goal is to prevent the president from winning the 2012 election. Democratic Senate aides today say that Thursday night’s episode highlighted the extremes to which Republicans are “making good on that promise at the expense of the economy.”
“McConnell isn’t happy unless the Senate is in a state of dysfunction,” a Senate aide said today of the GOP minority leader from Kentucky, Sen. Mitch McConnell. “He got hot under the collar last night, and was grasping at procedural straws to try to tank a bipartisan bill at the 11th hour.”
Republicans argue that the majority party, the Democrats, are taking a my-way-or-the-highway approach on everything. And that is not the way the Senate is supposed to work.
“We are fundamentally turning the Senate into the House. No amendments before cloture. No motions to suspend after cloture. The minority’s out of business,” McConnell said. “In the United States Senate, the minority is entitled to be heard. Not entitled to win, but entitled to be heard. That is the core problem here.”
A Republican Senate aide today said, “This is a remarkably short-sighted thing for Democrats to do, given that they’ll be in the minority some day.”
Members were sent home for the holiday weekend and instructed to cool off and let the air out of their tires a bit. Reid announced that he’d like to have a full caucus meeting with Democrats and Republicans to have a more civil debate about all the issues that came up in heated way in the Senate Thursday night.
As the dust settles today on Capitol Hill, the question left is whether the dynamic has fundamentally changed in the Senate. Has this poisoned the well?
The proverbial well wasn’t all that good to start off with. An ABC News-Washington Post poll released this week found that 14 percent of people approve of the job Congress is doing. “I have a hard time recalling any real bipartisan achievements from this Congress to show that it was functioning in the first place,” a Senate Democratic aide admitted today.
Asked if this latest dust-up will have ramifications, beyond the new precedent set for procedure, in the Senate’s working relationships, many said it will.
A Republican Senate aide thinks the Republicans will be less inclined to work with Reid in the next session, less inclined to give Reid cloture the next time he “fills the tree,” or cuts off additonal amendments, which is one of the many points to which Republicans objected Thursday night. “I think they learned a real lesson here: Just because you cooperate with Reid, doesn’t mean he won’t screw you,” a Republican aide said.
But Sarah Binder, an expert on Congress and legislative politics for the Brookings Institution, said that while Thursday night’s tensions boiled over, this was hardly a “revolutionary move” because such a dynamic has been in the Senate for a long time, nearly 50 years as the two parties have grown more polarized.
“Leaders long before Reid have been really frustrated with their inability to kind of control and move the Senate along toward final decisions,” Binder said. “No one likes to see the sausage getting made, but that is the reality of legislating in the Senate. It’s bared for all to see on the floor.”
Regardless of the long-term consequences of Thursday night’s procedural and political fight, one thing is for sure: Thursday night was not a good night for the Senate.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Big issues are piling up in Congress… yet the Democrat-led Senate is on pace for the “least productive” legislative session since records were first kept!!! —– And you just have to shake your heads at those headlines!!! —– Attorney General Holder under Fire over ‘Fast and Furious’… Harry Reid pulls “nuclear option” in Senate to Nix GOP Amendments! — Head of Embattled Energy Loan Program (Solyndra) Steps Down! — Nancy Pelosi says Stimulus Kept Unemployment Rate from Hitting 14.5%!! — You just gotta love those whacky Democrats!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | October 7, 2011, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
All I can say is “A POX on BOTH your houses Federal Government!! You’re ALL scum and NONE of you deserve to be re-elected. All of you have played a political game for 3 years and have done NOTHING to IMPROVE the state our Nation is in. And that state is DIRE!!! Wake up and do what you should because you were ALL elected to work for WE THE PEOPLE OF THE USA and NOT for yourselves OR for the WEALTHY!!!
Posted by: demnme | October 7, 2011, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
… “Democrats invoked the ‘nuclear option’ and used a simple majority to curb the rights of the supermajority.”
Wrong! The “rights” of a “supermajoirty” were not curbed. It was the “right” of a “minority” to thwart the will of the majority.
Posted by: TR | October 7, 2011, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Congressional Republicans need start packing their bags!! We’re cleaning out Congress next election!
Posted by: JOE | October 7, 2011, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Hey they work for ALL AMERICANS not just you and if an american is wealthy get over yourself they work for them too. Thats part of the problem here. Since when has it been me me me!!!!!!!!!! ITs us people everyone of us
Posted by: SlowDown | October 7, 2011, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
They said Republicans have made no secret that their goal is to prevent the president from winning the 2012 election.
This is basic treason. we will do whatever it takes while the restof the country suffers.
Kick them all out of office if they can not do the work we sent them there for.
Tea party get out of the mindset that our way or the highway. It is very childish and as we have seen non-productive.
Posted by: prohibition harms | October 7, 2011, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Congressional Democrat’s need start packing their bags!! We’re cleaning out Congress next election!
Posted by: DC | October 7, 2011, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
One of the objectives of the Republicans/Tea Partiers is to generate disgust, frustration and general disillusionment in the electorate (low voter turnout benefits them).
Another is to sow distrust and cynicism about the government in general, and making Congress appear ineffective if a great way to accomplish that.
Think about it; these folks HATE the government. They want to make it “small enough to drown in a bathtub” (and if that is not some violent, disturbing imagery, I don’t know what is). Never mind that the Founding Fathers ESTABLISHED said government and that opposing or actively sabotaging the system set up in the Constitution constitutes TREASON.
This whole “vote them all out” and “beyond parties” meme is designed to result in both widespread cynicism and defection from the polls AND the voting out of effective representatives so they can be replaced by corporate lobbyists. Fact is, there are some VERY significant differences between the two parties and the Founding Fathers intentionally set up our system to be adversarial and to have checks and balances, the better to prevent single-party rule/tyranny.
THINK, people.
Posted by: raven | October 7, 2011, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Anyone who thinks voting in a whole new set of people is going to change anything or solve any problem, you’re sadly delusional. All the parties have shown they are polarized to party, not country. This includes Tea Party, Republican, Democrat, etc. We need to be rid of the party system entirely and have politicians run on the platform of the PEOPLE ELECTING THEM, not on party politics.
Posted by: WorkingClass | October 7, 2011, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Didn’t H.R. go to the White House yesterday to met with B.O. about how to get B.O’s “jabs” bill passed? Guess they decided to run the “nuclear option” play.
Posted by: ZMan | October 7, 2011, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
So dems want to raise taxes on the richest 10% who already pay 70% of income taxes and they want to lower taxes on the poorest 50% that pay almost nothing. Does that make sense? You can ignore the fact that even a 100% tax rate on the rich will not cover the cost of Obama’s spending.
Posted by: Open-Mind | October 7, 2011, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
There will be no forward movement regarding good legislature until after the 2012 elections. Both parties are at fault. The Republicans focus should be on working with the President in creating jobs and on other important economic issues, not trying to get him out of office. The Democrats need to unite behind their President on important issues and grow some cohones regarding standing up for themselves. We the people are growing weary of hearing of such antics; I wouldn’t be surprised if the number of independents in Congress skyrockets after the 2012 elections.
Posted by: RohnertPark1 | October 7, 2011, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Good grief, Nancy Grace is gross!!!
Posted by: Steve | October 7, 2011, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
So much for democracy! If it was a republican president in office it would be the democrats goal to not re elect them so for you whiners saying it was republicans goal to remove BO from office 2012 that doesnt mean anything. Geeze you people really grab at straws here.
This is not the way our country works and Reid should be fired for this. Who does he think he is????This power trip must stop now cause this is dictation plain and simple. He doesnt decide laws they are suppose to vote on them . He has done this twice along with his rechet Pelosi friend. Seems to me they have been in office way to long and need to retire
Posted by: SlowDown | October 7, 2011, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Even Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, whose strategic move Thursday night was described by Republicans as “heavy-handed,” admitted the dysfunction. “This has to come to an end, — And yes Democrat Harry did it and never thought twice about it. Then Obama goes out and cry’s about how the GOP is keeping the jobs bill from being passed and never bothers to mention how it was Democrat Harry Reid that has kept the bill from coming up to a vote.
Posted by: mikemcdon321 | October 7, 2011, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
We get the government we make and we deserve. Anger and polarization is what the majority of Americans want and it’s no surprise that it’s reflected in our representatives. Sadly the only thing that can pull us out of this is someone we all hate more than each other. We need another 9/11 to shock the masses out of their self absorbed and pointless anger.
Posted by: glacia | October 7, 2011, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
The libs are out of control. I have never in my 55 years seen grown people act like these liberal democrats are acting. 2012 will be very painful for them, mark my words.
Posted by: billy bob | October 7, 2011, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
USA was #1 in manufacturing. Now we’re number 1 at warheads & tools of destruction & lies & deceit. pitiful. lucifer is winning. Not Obama’s fault for trying to make the country greener & more balanced. But the super powers that be won’t let it happen. & america suffers. & the world suffers with it. Greed is not good. That will be our final conclusion.
Posted by: gippy | October 7, 2011, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
The nuclear option was totally justified to move past obstructionist Republicans and get the jobs bill passed. Please note you Gop senators and representatives…pack your bags. Middle-class America is ticked-off at your delay tactics. We’re sending you HOME in 2012.
Posted by: bleaker | October 7, 2011, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Soooooo…..How do the dims get it passed in the House??? The Dims will live to regret this stunt.
Posted by: Allen | October 7, 2011, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
You have been there too long, you are no longer effective. I would rather have new ideas from pasionate newcomers and there definity needs to be time limits no more than 4 years. We do not need your selfish, inconsiderate, self-serving ideas anymore.
THANK YOU FOR WALKING OUT!!
Posted by: Raina | October 7, 2011, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
@billy bob – Then you’ve had your eyes closed for a very long time and ignored completely the action of one half of our 2 party system. You won’t do it, but if you stepped back and looked at your own attitude and what you ignored from the politicians you voted for you would see that it and you are equally at fault. Your own hate for Americans is so great that it’s blinding you to the fact that the country has been self destructing for at least the past 10 years. I’m defending no party but ask yourself what your ‘team’ hasn’t gotten that it asked for. I say ‘team’ because that’s the way people are acting. They expect nothing from the politicians they vote for other than being part of the ‘team’. The only way we can fix our political system is to fix the people who create what it is… us. Take as critical a look at the politicians you voted for as the ones you didn’t. I could easily and factually point out that every complaint you currently have is at least as much the fault of your ‘team’ as the other. But you will excuse one and blame the other because you expect nothing from your own ‘team’.
Posted by: glacia | October 7, 2011, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Bleaker–”The nuclear option was totally justified to move past obstructionist Republicans and get the jobs bill passed. Please note you Gop senators and representatives…pack your bags. Middle-class America is ticked-off at your delay tactics. We’re sending you HOME in 2012.”— UMMM you need to actually READ the article.. Reid invoked the “nuclear option” to PREVENT a vote on he president’s jobs bill. the president has been campaigning to “pass this bill” — Well, McConnell (R) asked that the bill be brought for a vote on the 4th and Reid said NO and tabled the bill. Then Republicans tried to attach the jobs bill to the China currency bill so that it could be voted on and Reid used the “nuclear option” to prevent them from getting it introduced.. GET A CLUE– THE DEMOCRATS ARE NOT WILLING TO VOTE ON THE JOBS BILL… they are the obstructionists..and the reason is simple.. As long as the bill isn’t voted on, the president has something to campaign on.. the minute the bill is voted on, then DEMOCRATS face losing the next election because the bill RAISES taxes in a down economy.. THE BILL SUCKS.. and REID knows if DEMS vote for it, they LOSE in 2012…
Posted by: arkie vet | October 7, 2011, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
there should be a big tub of mud on the senate floor so all those goofballs can literally sling it at each other all day long.
Posted by: grumpopolis | October 7, 2011, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Just as with health care, debate is nonexistent and the Democrats resort to undiluted fascism when it suits them! Reid and Pelosi were born to wear jackboots, black uniforms adorned with lightning bolts, and to carry small whips! Someone must step forward and take this country back and restore the Constitution to its rightful place. It appears that Sarah Palin lacked the courage we believed she possessed and has left it to someone else, either because her patriotic fire flickered or she really did put the almighty dollar before her country! Disappointment if not disillusionment is widespread. Now, we must find that patriot, that leader who will tear down the flag of totalitarianism and light the flame of Americanism is this country again. That person does not seem to be amongst the current crop of Republicans since even Ms. Bachmann stumbles in her quest for the presidency. Hope dwindles and one must worry that America will continue down the dark path that Reid and Pelosi force us to follow.
Posted by: tvhumphrey | October 7, 2011, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
With Harry (Scum Bag) Reid as the leader the Senate hasn’t even come close to reaching its low. Remember Obamacare “passing” the Senate? The Budget debacle ? Harry’s got 5 more years so all we can hope for is a Republican senate.
Posted by: ray | October 7, 2011, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
I never cease to amaze as the hypocrisy on this forum. I said the nuclear option was wrong when Republicans threatened to do it…and it is wrong now that the Democrats have done it. What is even more disappointing was that it was used at this time. Because of a divided government, Reid made this dangerous move and still will not get what he wants because the House will stop it. The rights of the minority were intentionally protected by the Senate rules because we want our leaders to come to a consensus (even though it’s difficult). We do not want the majority, whether Republican or Demorat, to have absolute control.
Posted by: memphispiano | October 7, 2011, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
absolutely sickening; and what’s even more sickening is the stubborn attitude of the republicans on this post. Cut the bull. I hope you all end up in the bread line and I’m the one handing out the bread, because I’d let all of you morons starve. You want stubborn. I hope the Dems rip you a new one and I hope Obama wins in 2012, just to show you what a bunch of losers you truly are! You don’t want what’s best for the country because there isn’t an independent thinker among you. You follow like sheep.
Posted by: carole | October 7, 2011, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
absolutely sickening; and what’s even more sickening is the stubborn attitude of the republicans on this post. Cut the bull. I hope you all end up in the bread line and I’m the one handing out the bread, because I’d let all of you morons starve. You want stubborn. I hope the Dems rip you a new one and I hope Obama wins in 2012, just to show you what a bunch of losers you truly are! You don’t want what’s best for the country because there isn’t an independent thinker among you. You follow like sheep.”
You tell ‘em. They are nothing but a bunch of losers. Makes me sick too!
Posted by: Jeffrey Immelt | October 7, 2011, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
memphispiano, using logic in these discussions gets you nowhere. i try all the time and am constantly beaten back by mindless partisanship. i do, however, applaud you for both employing logic and attempting to apply it here…however futile the effort may be. i’m convinced that a large number, if not a majority, of people who post here treat politics like a sport, as if winning the argument is all that matters, regardless of “winning” actually leads to national destruction.
Posted by: grumpopolis | October 7, 2011, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
“They said Republicans have made no secret that their goal is to prevent the president from winning the 2012 election.”——–Why is this a shocker and why do the dems keep harping on it? That is what the opposite party always does, repubs or dems. Stop this silly whining about this statement and do your jobs or get out of D.C. We have so many acute problems in this country–do your job or go home!
Posted by: jonnie | October 7, 2011, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Whatever one’s views on the issue, this article does a poor job of describing it. To say that the “Democrats … used a simple majority to curb the rights of the supermajority” makes no sense at all. Neither party has enough senators to be described as a “supermajority” and, if they did, a simple majority vote could not curb their rights.
What the Democrats are trying to do is to prevent the Republicans (who are in the minority) from using the filibuster to stop passage of any legislation that a majority of senators would vote for. If only one senator filibusters, the Senate can end the filibuster only by a vote of cloture which must pass by a 2/3 majority (i.e., a supermajority). The filibuster can be a useful tool for allowig minority views to be heard. But if the minority party uses the filibuster regularly to stop legislation favored by the majority of the senators chosen by the people, then the that party is thwarting the will of the people & ignoring the results of our elections.
Posted by: Sally | October 7, 2011, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
another day in paradise
Posted by: gippy | October 7, 2011, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Carol (4:46 PM); I think you missed the whole point of the story. Focus.
Posted by: newcountryman | October 7, 2011, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Worse than a low……..an attack on our very system of government, by the Democrats.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | October 7, 2011, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Senate low? Not even close. How about the caning of Senator Sumner in 1856 in the chamber. That seems just a bit worse.
Posted by: Moby49 Detroit | October 7, 2011, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Senator Feinstein on republican THREAT to use nuclear option 2005….”The nuclear option, if sucessfull, will turn the senate into a body that could have it’s rules broken at any time, by a majority of senators unhappy with any posistion of the minority, it begins with judicial nominations, next executive appointments, and then LEGISLATION”………
Posted by: dan young | October 7, 2011, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
I believe the ‘nuclear option’ was used because the Republicans insisted that the Senate’s next vote must be on the Presidents “Jobs Bill” that President Obama insists congress must pass now. Why did the article not mention this fact. PS Thank You Dan Young 9:41 October 7th.
Posted by: David Benish | October 7, 2011, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Anyone that can’t see that Harry Reid is simply running interference for Obama is either hopelessly politically biased or brain dead.
Posted by: newcountryman | October 8, 2011, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Worse than a low……..an attack on our very system of government, by the Democrats. Posted by: Rick McDaniel | October 7, 2011, 6:19 pm.
LOL! Except that this particular procedural maneuver is allowed under Senate rules. So, according to you, implementing certain Senate rules constitutes an attack on the government. I’d bet good money that if the Republicans did the same thing, y’all on the Right would be cheering them on wholeheartedly……….
Posted by: Searambler | October 8, 2011, 9:17 am 9:17 am
If a republican did this the media would have their panties bunched up
Posted by: daniel | October 8, 2011, 9:18 am 9:18 am
The Republicans in the Senate could have avoided this measure by simply voting on the China trade agreement bill WITHOUT trying to attach the jobs bill and the ‘farm dust’ bill to it. They played chicken with Reid and they lost. Now they whine about it. Typical, pathetic, craven weenies…………..
Posted by: Searambler | October 8, 2011, 9:19 am 9:19 am
FTA — “Democratic aides consistently point out that Republicans have made no secret that their goal is to prevent the president from winning the 2012 election.” I’m shocked!!!! Republicans are trying to get a Republican candidate elected President?!?!?! That’s just not right. I seem to recall that the democrats in the senate worked very hard to get Republican President George Bush re-elected over the democratic candidate Kerry in the 2004 election.
Posted by: Hood Roberts | October 8, 2011, 9:20 am 9:20 am
The problem in the Senate is Harry Reid.
Until he’s gone it will remain Kabuki theatre.
Posted by: Noz | October 8, 2011, 9:30 am 9:30 am
How low will Harry and the Democrats go… Obama is not King and this is not a dictatorship!
Posted by: Freedom | October 8, 2011, 9:37 am 9:37 am
The Republicans have said they will do anything to stop Obama from getting re-elected. WHY?
Because the American people want them to. That is what the 2010 elections were all about.
His policies have made things worse.
Yes, there is gridlock – the voters put it there.
Exactly why the framers of the Constitution designed it that way. To stop ineptitude.
Posted by: 30moves | October 8, 2011, 10:04 am 10:04 am
“They played chicken with Reid and they lost.”…..we all lost….and if there was any pretense about what’s happenning here, it should be just about gone now.
Posted by: newcountryman | October 8, 2011, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Everyone knows now, according to White House press secretary Carney, that it’s political gamesmanship for the Republicans to call Obama on his “pass this bill now” rhetoric. What a hoot.
Posted by: newcountryman | October 8, 2011, 10:14 am 10:14 am
So much for Obama being the great uniter…
Posted by: allen | October 8, 2011, 10:27 am 10:27 am
“So much for Obama being the great uniter.”
You cannot unite two sides if one side absolutely, flat out refuses to compromise or negotiate in good faith with the other side, like the Republicans have been doing since day one…………
Posted by: Searambler | October 8, 2011, 11:01 am 11:01 am
“They played chicken with Reid and they lost.”…..we all lost….
Posted by: newcountryman | October 8, 2011, 10:08 am.
How? The jobs bill is still there, being ‘tweaked’ by Reid before introducing it as a stand-alone bill. The way it SHOULD be. Not attached to some Chinese trade bill along with that ‘farm dust’ bill. So how do we all lose by this?
Posted by: Searambler | October 8, 2011, 11:03 am 11:03 am
“The jobs bill is still there, being ‘tweaked’ by Reid before introducing it as a stand-alone bill. . . . . So how do we all lose by this?” – Searambler
The only way I can see us losing is if they pass the Bill and we flush another 500 Billion down the federal toilet.
Let Harry play with it a while, that’s OK.
Posted by: Noz | October 8, 2011, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Sea; We lost because nothing is getting done. But now that I think about it, maybe that’s a good thing with the way these guys are operating with our tax money.
Posted by: newcountryman | October 8, 2011, 11:37 am 11:37 am
It’s not the presidents job to pass legislation. Under the constitution his only responsibility is to enforce the laws Congress passes. Why do we insist that the president take responsibility for this do nothing Congress. He can try to influence and mediate legislation but he can’t force them to move. His only power is derived by the fact that he his the only one elected by the whole country. President Obama his doing the only thing he can do, take his case to the American people and see if he can convince them to make Congress get off their butts.
Posted by: tferretti | October 8, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Noz wrote, “The only way I can see us losing is if they pass the Bill and we flush another 500 Billion down the federal toilet.”
Typical Republican response. Zero substance. Tax credits for employers who hire veterans is bad because…? Tax credits for employers who hire the long term unemployed is bad because…? Investing money into rebuilding and repairing our infrastructure and re-employing tens of thousands of construction workers is bad because…? Adding a couple of percentage points onto the taxes paid by millionaires and billionaires to pay for all this is bad because…? Why not look at the actual proposition itself and debate its merits, rather than post the same old same old stock knee-jerk Republican answer? “If Obama supports it, we oppose it. Period”. The insane and unreasoning hatred on the Right for “All Things Obama” is doing more to damage this country than almost anything else…………
Posted by: Searambler | October 8, 2011, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Obama sent Congress his jobs plan and told them to vote on it. That’s exactly what the Republicans did….they wanted it to be voted on. The dems knew Obama’s plan was DOA so Reid did the only thing he could and pushed the nuclear button. However, it will backfire tremendously after the Republicans take the Senate back as they’ll use it as a weapon of mass payback at every opportunity.
Posted by: afkbrad | October 8, 2011, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Obama is merely being treated the same way dems treated Bush. It’s called political payback and it happens all the time. Dems blasted Bush at every opportunity and now it’s Obama’s turn.
Until Obama is so politically battered he has a hard time getting out of bed in the morning we will be here to remind everyone of his mistakes.
Posted by: afkbrad | October 8, 2011, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
It’s really a shame no one actually reads our constitution or Hamilton’s Federalist Papers that explains the founders motives. The presidency (executive) was intended to be the least powerful branch of our government. The founders did not want a new monarchy.
It’s Congress’s role to actually legislate and solve the problems of the country as a whole. They’ve refused to do their job and expect the president to do it for them.
It reminds me of an old allegory.
There was a kingdom where everyone loved their king. All that was heard from the people was “LONG LIVE THE KING.” One day a witch poisoned the well and the people became insane. They committed crimes and became a real Sodom and Gomorrah. The king, who did not drink the water, tried to stop them. The people began to hate him; they shouted “DOWN WITH THE KING”. The king really loved his people so he went to the well and drank. He became as crazy as they were.
President Obama’s problem is he refuses to drink from the poisoned well.
Posted by: tferretti | October 8, 2011, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
This is totalitarianism in its ugliest manifestation! How long will the American people tolerate fascists in the guise of Democrats forcing us all to submit to their wanton will? It is a true shock to see even the spineless swine Reid stoop to this level of legislative savagery!
Posted by: brainstormUSA | October 8, 2011, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Tferretti; Some people actually think he is the King. I’m not trying to be a smart a$$ either.
Posted by: newcountryman | October 8, 2011, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Tferretti; Some people actually think he is the King. I’m not trying to be a smart a$$ either. Posted by: newcountryman | October 8, 2011, 2:05 pm.
I can usually agree to disagree with you, newcountryman, but that statement is about the dumbest thing you’ve ever posted here. It sounds like something Rush or Beck would spew. You’re better than that…..
Posted by: Searambler | October 8, 2011, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
NEWCOUNTRYMAN
What most people fail to realize is the office of the Presidency has very little power compared to the Congress and the Supreme Court. The Presidency gets all the attention because its the most out front branch and the president draws the attention of the press. Its easier to blame one person than a group or groups of politians. The mindless tea party just exaserbated the problem.
As I said the only real power the president has is that he was elected by all the people. The public fails to realize it not his job to solve the problems of this country. Thats the responsibility of Congress, who has failed miserably, playing politics instead of doing what is needed.
BRAINSTORM
Reid, Bohner, Cantor, et al are playing politics at the expense of this country. Its a broken Congress and both sides are to blame.
Posted by: tferretti | October 8, 2011, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
POSTED BY: TFERRETTI | OCTOBER 8, 2011, 2:22 PM ++You forgot Pelosi
Posted by: allen | October 8, 2011, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
This is totalitarianism in its ugliest manifestation!
Posted by: brainstormUSA | October 8, 2011, 1:55 pm.
Why? What they did is allowed under the rules of the Senate. So why is it ‘totalitarianism’ in ANY manifestation?
Posted by: Searambler | October 8, 2011, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
ALLEN
Ya, Pelosi and Steny Hoyer too, but I’ll say one thing for them, they stay pretty much out of this name-calling and kids stuff and seem to be able to keep the House democrats pretty much in line.
Posted by: tferretti | October 8, 2011, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Another problem we have, beside corrupt politians, is the corrupt media. The networks are controlled and operated by billionares and media excutives. It is in their interests to keep this election close. Billions of dollars in ratings and advertising could be lost if the election became a runaway.
When the president makes polical points, the media tears him down an hour later, and vice versa when the republicans make points the media does the same to them.
I’m tired of hearing someone speak and have 20 minutes of pundits telling me what they “really” meant. The press has failed miserably in their purpose of keepimg government honest. They have become part of the problem. The only real news and investigational reporting I get is on the local stations. The main stream media use their sources in the whitehouse or congressional breifing rooms and thnk there doing a hell of a job reporting the truth, not even close.
The anchors and commentators say what the owners of the major communcation companies want them to say. Their careers and salaries depend on it. The news has become entertainment. I don’t care whether I need my prostate examined once every five years, once every ten years, or never. They need to concentrate on real news and get off their butts and work for the truth.
What ever happened to people like Woodward and Bernstein.
Posted by: tferretti | October 8, 2011, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Seems as though when Obama has finally been booted from the WH, there will be many messes to clean, but the Congress may be the most stained of all. The 111th Congress was a disgrace the way they ignored the will of the people, and the 112th has been stymied by absurd proposals from the President and Reid’s desperate acts to play loyal flunky.
Posted by: n'erdowell | October 8, 2011, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
The adage “you get the government that you deserve” couldn’t be more true. We elected these guys, most of the time just because of thier party. What bills have your congressmen submitted? When was the last time you looked at the Federal Register? Do you only get your news from TV? We can no longer wait for the “other guy” to hopefully vote the way we would want. So stop your whining, most of you didn’t even vote.
Posted by: Michael Wofford | October 8, 2011, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Michael Wofford is right oh the money. Have you talked to your congressman,
called his office to complain, express your opinion. Do you know what he supports.
Blame yourself first, because you the voter send them there. And then do not forget
you can help vote them out, but you must participate. Talk to your neighbors and spread the word good or bad. Letter to the local newspaper all this is a way to participate. If your not willing to speak up,then you have no one but yourself to blame.
Posted by: deadwrestler | October 8, 2011, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Not since Mussolini and the March on Rome have fascists enjoyed the triumphs they have under the Obama/Reid/Pelosi triad! They have subjugated the American people and in the process destroyed the democratic republic that was founded to grant freedom to the individual. It may already be too late to take this country back and restore the Constitution for the thugs in Congress who do the Democratic Party’s bidding have used a profound form of economic warfare against the people in order to bring them to their knees and break resistance. Now, with the occupation of public space and the attacks by mobs on the Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C., chaos is being propagated and tolerated as additional savagery in the ongoing battle to crush the will of the Middle Class. All this is obvious to the educated observer and informed Americans will fight back with a fury when they go to the polls!
Posted by: americaislost | October 9, 2011, 6:52 am 6:52 am
AMERICAISLOST, October 9, 2011, 6:52 AM…..
LOL!……. Right ring rhetoric. Lots of fancy words in a whole paragraph, but all hollow and with no meaning. I especially like the part about “the battle to crush the middle class”. ……… “Oooooooooh Wowzie!” (LMAO!).
If you really want to talk about a battle to crush the middle class, you need to read these quotes from various articles on the web that describe how the middle class has drastically shrunk since 2000:
“The manufacturing jobs that once helped millions get ahead have been in sharp decline for a decade, and now number one-third less than they did in 2000, despite a growing population.”
“Wages have fallen as jobs have migrated overseas, with the typical family’s income, after inflation, down 5 percent since 2000.”
“In 1950, the ratio of the average executive’s paycheck to the average worker’s paycheck was about 30 to 1. Since the year 2000, that ratio has exploded to between 300 to 500 to one.”
LOL! ….. this war on the middle class has been going on for the past decade, and who has been the party that has controlled the government for most of the time since 2000, i.e., during the past decade? The Republican Party……. You must have had your head in the sand since 2000… LOL! …. and are only coming out now to “whine”.
Posted by: Forrest Gump is a Republican | October 9, 2011, 10:56 am 10:56 am
They have subjugated the American people and in the process destroyed the democratic republic…..Posted by: americaislost | October 9, 2011, 6:52 am.
LOL! No, they haven’t. No one has been “subjugated”, and nothing has been “destroyed”. When did Republicans get into all of this ridiculous, over-the-top hyperbole? Oh right, when the Tea Baggers took control of the Party………..
Posted by: Searambler | October 9, 2011, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Who’s surprised that the democrats would do this? I’m not. They’ve done worse in the House.
Posted by: TexBork | October 9, 2011, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Since 1980 – 16 times republican senate. 7 times democrat senate. This puts them up to 8. In other words, more faux outrage by the cons as they do it the most and then cry like babies when it’s done back.
Posted by: Secondlook | October 9, 2011, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
— Head of Embattled Energy Loan Program (Solyndra) Steps Down! — Nancy Pelosi says
Stimulus
Kept Unemployment Rate from Hitting 14.5%!! — You just gotta love those whacky Democrats!!!
POSTED BY: THELOYALOPPOSITION |**************Whacky, but the NEOCONS are just as bad!
Remember Enron, a major contributing fund raiser to Bushs campaign, Bush tried his damnedest
to stir away from that fiasco.
This behavior all started up when oxycodin enriched Limbaugh had
constipation of the brain and diarrhea of the mouth. He stating that he wanted Obama to fail and
told his one cell brain followers to try their best to do just that.
Posted by: michael | October 9, 2011, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm