Oct 25, 2011 12:05am

Jon Huntsman Vies for ‘The Colbert Bump’

With poor poll percentages and even worse fundraising numbers, there’s no denying that these days Jon Huntsman could use a little public relations pick-me-up.

On Monday, the former governor swapped out the New Hampshire house party circuit for Comedy Central’s “The Colbert Report” in an effort to obtain the popularity propellant that is “The Colbert bump.”

“I like you,” host Stephen Colbert said to Huntsman. “I like the cut of your jib. I don’t know what a jib is but I like the way you cut it.”

“In recent polls you are at two percent. Are you ready for the Colbert bump?” Colbert asked.

“I am so ready for the Colbert bump,” Huntsman answered.

Colbert continued, “Governor you may be at two percent. We’re going to get you up to whole milk.”

Huntsman’s appearance on the show allowed him to reach out to Colbert’s key 18-49 demographic, discussing his experience in politics and the private sector to an entirely new audience. However,  it was a joke Huntsman made about China, the country where he served as ambassador for two years, that caused the crowd to groan.

When Colbert played a sound effect of a stereotypical Chinese riff, Huntsman joked, “When’s the delivery food coming?” After a few seconds of awkward silence, Colbert replied, “Did that go over well in Beijing?” This portion of the interview was cut for time from the broadcast.

“There was a gasp,” audience member Dana Cole told ABC News. “A little tasteless. No one really saw it coming. He got ahead of himself. ”

“I think he was just really nervous honestly,” said Zach Zirlin, who was also in the crowd. “He was just trying to humanize himself a little bit … I think he brings a very fresh face to the Republican Party. All the past candidates were not easy to relate to and he seems more human than the rest.”

Huntsman quickly won back the group again after Colbert asked him to say something in Mandarin.

“I just said I’d think you ought to consider being my running mate for vice president,” Huntsman said as the crowd erupted into applause.

Colbert then asked Huntsman about comments made by Pastor Robert Jeffress, the Rick Perry event speaker who referred to Mormonism as a cult.

“There’s been a lot of ugly talk in the campaign lately about the faith that you and Mitt Romney share — Mormonism,” Colbert said. “What do you make of people calling Mormonism a cult? And by the way, I’m a Catholic, You’re a Mormon. Let’s not argue over who’s right and who is not a Catholic.”

“Well first of all you get in a whole lot of trouble talking about religion so you should never go there, particularly when you’re seeking votes and you’re running for public office,” Huntsman replied. “But let me say when John F. Kennedy ran in 1960, what were people calling Catholicism? A cult. So they come out they become more mainstream, John F. Kennedy wins and the religion goes mainstream. It’s probably the same thing with Mormonism. It will become more mainstream overtime as people kind of look at it and understand it a bit better.”

“We feel very excited about ‘The Colbert bump’,” Huntsman’s spokesman Tim Miller told ABC News before the former governor’s appearance. “The show should be fun for everyone involved and Governor Huntsman is excited at the prospect of getting into the nitty gritty of his tax reform proposal with Stephen.”

Colbert first coined his “Colbert bump” neologism to reference the success that several politicians found after being interviewed on his show. While no evidence directly links Colbert’s Midas touch with improved election results, Professor James H. Fowler of the University of California, San Diego found that an appearance on “The Colbert Report” may in fact bolster fundraising efforts for certain politicians.

Professor Fowler explained his 2008 research methodology to ABC News: “In this article I use “facts” (sorry, Stephen) provided by the Federal Election Commission to create a matched control group of candidates who have never appeared on The Colbert Report. I then compare the personal campaign donations they receive to those received by candidates who have appeared on the program’s segment ‘Better Know a District.’

“The results show that Democratic candidates who appear on the Report receive a statistically significant ‘Colbert bump’ in campaign donations, raising 44 percent more money in a 30-day period after appearing on the show. However, there is no evidence of a similar boost for Republicans. These results constitute the first scientific evidence of Stephen Colbert’s influence on political campaigns,” Fowler said.

Regardless of whether or not Huntsman’s interview translates into increased campaign fundraising, the former governor can certainly benefit from some screen time. Earlier this month, Huntsman passed on the opportunity to appear at CNN’s Western Leadership Presidential Debate in Las Vegas to boycott an early Nevada caucus.

According to Nielsen ratings, the debate earned 5.5 million total viewers, whereas Colbert averages around 1.5 million viewers a night.

SHOWS:

User Comments

Lol, I did not know about the “chinese delivery” joke. Shame they cut it out.

Anyway, it was a good interview. I think if he runs for President, he would steal a lot of Democrat votes. Too bad the Republicans aren’t smart enough to elect him.

Posted by: Hamza | October 25, 2011, 12:48 am 12:48 am

“But let me say when John F. Kennedy ran in 1960, what were people calling Catholicism? A cult. So they come out they become more mainstream, John F. Kennedy wins and the religion goes mainstream.” Wow! I’m pretty sure that Roman Catholocism was “mainstream” a bit before 1960! And I don’t think anyone called it a “cult” in 1960 either.

Posted by: DUH | October 25, 2011, 8:50 am 8:50 am

He has had some serious trouble with the aesthetics of his campaign, especially getting his campaign and those they deal with to get his name right. I sat down last night to watch the Colbert Report and under the information section of last night’s show, the network said it would be Jon Huntsman Sr, a philanthropist and businessman. I was intrigued to watch it because I think he is an interesting guy that has done a lot of good. However when Colbert moved over to the interview it was actually Jon Huntsman Jr. I don’t know if it was due to the fact that Jr. decided to jettison that part of his name (so that he might have more name recognition bc of his father) and so the network just assumed that’s who it was, or what the case was. Whatever it was, it continues to be amateur hour on his campaign.

The man is not ready to lead a nation. The reason why he doesn’t poll better than 2% is because people just don’t like him. A major drawback, truthfully, is that he worked for Obama’s administration – I know the whole soundbite of when you are called you serve, but being from Utah in those circles you heard different stories and motives at the time – and repubs and independents are tired of Obama’s administration. I imagine he is trying to get a high-ranking cabinet position but might end up being left on the bench if he keeps distracting voters from the main competitors.

Posted by: Hamza2 | October 25, 2011, 8:53 am 8:53 am

Huntsman Sr is funding cancer hospitals and intends to die the same way he grew up – with nothing. Can Buffet or Gates (or any of the others advocating the wealthy pay more in taxes) say the same? Some talk a good game, while others accomplish.

Posted by: deanbob | October 25, 2011, 9:24 am 9:24 am

“I think he was just really nervous honestly,” said Zach Zirlin, who was also in the crowd. “He was just trying to humanize himself a little bit … I think he brings a very fresh face to the Republican Party. All the past candidates were not easy to relate to and he seems more human than the rest.”

Translation:” He’s more liberal/Democrat-like. And that’s what we’re looking for in a REPUBLICAN candidate.” /s

Posted by: Clink | October 25, 2011, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

If you think Roman Catholicism was not called a cult in the ’50s you are very wrong. I remember the pamphlets which circulated at the time, and which still do. It and Mormonism is stlill tagged as that by many who would rather get their information from those churches enemies than from the real sources. The bottom line is that this nation was not founded on prejudice but tolerance and brotherhood. Let’s be true to those principles and objectively look at what any candidate can offer the country.

History is that the founder of Mormonism ran for US president when states and federal governments would not protect them from an extermination order in Missouri. Just think of it, a call for extermination of a people within our nation’s boundaries. And the Mormons still remain highly patriotic because they believe in the principles on which this nation was founded, even though many of the nation’s citizens haven’t, don’t, and will not.

Posted by: Red, White, and Blue | October 25, 2011, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

I thought Huntsman came across poorly on the show, and didn’t appreciate his glib “I’m part of the one percent” line, or his arm waving after asking Colbert to be his running mate (in Mandarin).

Huntsman was the only GOP candidate who I thought could make 2012 a real race, but no more. Colbert is great, and going on his show could have been a good strategy, but this performance was pathetic.

Posted by: Gracie M | October 26, 2011, 6:11 am 6:11 am

If he showed the kind of humor, openness, energy and charm on the campaign trail that he showed on Colbert, he’d be in the lead now.

Posted by: A person | October 26, 2011, 7:54 am 7:54 am

The delivery joke seems to me like it’s a joke about Colbert and his satirical stereotypes, not any sort of joke about Chinese Americans themselves. I don’t see any big problem.

Posted by: Lancer | October 27, 2011, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

The real joke is that any sign of rationality or responsibility will keep a candidate from being the 2012 RepubliCLOWN Presidential candidate. That is why the July 2012 meeting in Tampa will be known as “The Convention of Village Idiots.”
The likely Clown Candidate will be a RepubliCLOWN Governor or Senator or someone who is not up for re-election and has nothing to lose by running against President Obama.

Posted by: Jym Allyn | October 27, 2011, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

If it was between him and Obama I would vote for him and I usually vote democrat.

Posted by: Jamie | October 28, 2011, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.