Little Talk of Housing Crisis on the Campaign Trail

Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images
When the mortgage crisis erupted in 2007, the housing industry dominated the political agenda.
Seven years later, the economy remains on the forefront of Americans’ minds but contenders for the 2012 elections have little to say about the housing industry, the future of which remains bleak.
Mitt Romney incited the ire of liberals and President Obama when he suggested Tuesday that banks shouldn’t stop the foreclosure process and instead let them “hit the bottom.”
“The idea of the federal government running around and saying, hey, we’re going to give you some money for trading in your old car, or we’re going to give you a few thousand bucks for buying a new house, or we’re going to keep banks from foreclosing if you can’t make your payments, these kind of actions on the part of government haven’t worked,” the leading Republican 2012 contender said at Tuesday night’s debate in Nevada, which has the highest foreclosure rate in the country.
But other GOP candidates have been relatively mum on the issue, even as the housing industry remains weak.
“No one has very good ideas of what to do about this situation that we’re in right now,” said Peter J. Wallison, a fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute who served as counsel to President Ronald Reagan. “It’s a much more complex issue than talking about the debt or defense policy or foreign policy. This is a very complicated financial problem and to try and explain it in a soundbite is very hard to do.”
The housing market is predicted to remain weak as the 2012 election cycle begins. In its Economic and Housing Forecasts for October 2011 report, Fannie Mae forecasts that home sales will continue to weaken and that mortgage applications haven’t increased despite low interest rates and government programs to jolt the market.
“In this type of environment, the housing market remains very sluggish and consumers’ willingness to dig into their savings to purchase big ticket items is very low,” Fannie Mae’s chief economist Doug Duncan said in a statement. “Leading indicators point to housing sales bouncing near the bottom at least through the end of 2012.”
The Obama administration has launched several programs to jolt the sluggish market, but only a handful have been met with mixed success.
The $75 billion Home Affordable Mortgage Insurance Program, launched in March 2009, didn’t attract as many distressed homebuyers as the administration had hoped. Some people who took advantage of the program ended up defaulting again on their mortgage. The Federal Housing Administration’s refinancing program has also taken heavy criticism for the same reason.
“I think the program wasn’t aggressive,” said leading economist and Yale professor Robert Shiller. “We are still in this situation that homeowners are exposed to real estate risk and there’s not much being done for them.”
Consumer confidence plays a significant role in how people perceive their elected leaders. A weak housing market, coupled with the economic crisis, could spell trouble for President Obama. Battleground states like Florida, Nevada and Ohio boast some of the highest foreclosure rates in the country. And the sluggish market is weighing generally on consumer confidence.
“It’s a drag on the economy and it’s a drag on confidence,” Shiller said. “Consumer confidence is at record lows… and it’s related to the fact that so many people are wiped out or underwater or they’re worried about being under water soon. It’s affected the mortgage portfolios of banks.”
A turnaround in the housing market would boost the economy and help Obama’s reelection chances, not dissimilar to President Roosevelt who won a second term in 1936 despite the Great Depression. But critics say the administration has taken too long to turn back the dial.
“All of these programs have caused people to rethink what is happening in the mortgage markets and the housing markets and to be wary of the government’s involvement in those markets and the danger that the government may do something again that will cause housing prices to fall further,” Wallison said.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Of course they haven’t mentioned the housing market. They haven’t said much about jobs, either. It’s much more fun to just bicker about more useless stuff. After all, that’s what the American public is used to: the blather of idiots who don’t say anything. Just turn on on of those oh-so-popular reality shows. That’s what they want, and that’s what these candidates are giving them.
Posted by: WorkingClass | October 20, 2011, 8:31 am 8:31 am
So what’s the point of this? That government should pay these mortgages? The financial meltdown was cause by government policies that forced banks to lend to “risky” borrowers. The Community Reinvestment Act ultimately is responsible for the financial collapse of the United States. Helping folks buy homes they cannot afford is really bad policy.
Posted by: wb-San Diego | October 20, 2011, 9:00 am 9:00 am
No talk of the housing crisis on the campagin trail? Of course not! It’s a hot potato. Big surprise.
Posted by: newcountryman | October 20, 2011, 9:08 am 9:08 am
@WB “The financial meltdown was caused by government policies that forced banks to lend to risky borrowers.” — Are you kidding me? Forced? More economists (a LOT more) say Wall Street is to blame and that greedy bankers knowingly manipulated things to take advantage of homeowners and mortgage investors. Who made all of the money? Certainly not the homeowners who, if they didn’t default, owe more than their homes are worth. Not the government either since it’s been found that that refers to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac who have gone belly up. Wall Street made the money. They weren’t forced into anything. They did it gleefully.
Posted by: Dawnseven | October 20, 2011, 9:47 am 9:47 am
At the peak of the housing market lending frenzy, it’s true that lenders were in high gear trying to lend as much as they could…..even to the point that if the borrower would not accept the terms of 120% of the home’s appraised value it was a deal breaker. A small precentage of applicants actually walked out because they recognized it would all be on them. Unfortunately, many others were intimidated or worn out and accepted. It depends on your point of view who was more to blame….
Posted by: newcountryman | October 20, 2011, 10:01 am 10:01 am
No talk of the housing crisis on the campagin trail? Of course , GOP has no clue to what an idea is to help the country. They are too busy arguing with the next wingnut. Obama 2012. The only logical choice. If Obama gets elected again, the congress will HAVE TO work with him this time because their strategy of the last 4 years (let’s do nothing but make sure Obama is a 1 term president) is a childish one & they should be punished for wasting all our time & money & at a time when we need to pull together. Obama will do what he says , we will change, change is hard, especially with the GOP derailing anything good you’re trying to do. GOP stinks & I hope everyone takes note & votes them out because we don’t have time for that crap. Obama has more character & fortitude than any GOP candidate. Stop watching Fox News & Rush Limbaugh & you will stop being programmed with BS.
Posted by: hhh | October 20, 2011, 10:05 am 10:05 am
@newcountryman – what about all those bad loans they packaged & sold & bought insurance against? Again you somehow can’t see what’s really happening just like all the GOP people. I think Fox News & Rush Limbaugh are to blame. They will say anything to create the notion that all the mess is caused bu Democrats…It’s like they try to white wash all the crap that happened from 2000-2008. We will never recover if we stay divided on stuff like Regulating Wall Street. Geez GOP is bad medicine guaranteed.
Posted by: hhh | October 20, 2011, 10:09 am 10:09 am
“The Community Reinvestment Act ultimately is responsible for the financial collapse of the United States” — WRONG! I wish people would stop repeating this lie and look into it. Every study of CRA loans shows that they were actually SAFER than the subprime loans the banks were giving out. CRA-qualified loans are the smallest percentage of the mortgages that have gone into foreclosure.
Posted by: WorkingClass | October 20, 2011, 10:15 am 10:15 am
I don’t know why liberals care, what these guys talk about. Their messah has done nothing whatsoever about jobs and housing. But they are so brain washed by being spoon fed, they can’t think for themselves.
Posted by: jonny | October 20, 2011, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Well of course not. The housing crisis doesn’t impact any of them personally. Their houses are safe. Even the guys like Romney with multiple houses. They don’t talk about it because they really don’t care about it. They would rather attack the president and each other than actually debate important issues to Americans………..
Posted by: Searambler | October 20, 2011, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Maybe because this isn’t a housing crisis, this is the natural order of what happens when the government creates artificial demand. The government created artificial demand, the price of homes went up artificially high, now that that artificial demand is gone, the price will go back down to normal levels, and more than likely below normal levels, because we have a glut of houses on the market that millions of people paid too much for, and now cannot sell because, no one wants it for the price they are offering.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | October 20, 2011, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Your home is only worth what someone else is willing to pay for it, everything else is just estimates and assumptions.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | October 20, 2011, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Haven’t talked about no budget from Harry Reid and the inept senate either.
Posted by: Freedom | October 20, 2011, 11:40 am 11:40 am
For those of you who think that the “FED” or the government was mainly responsible for this ‘housing crisis’ …all I can do is LOL. Because you have no clue of the ‘greed’ that went on with the ‘big banks, the investors, the mortgage brokers and the crooked realtors and appraisers’. And it can be catagorized in one word: GRRED. And the sad part is that there is still no ‘solid regulations’ in place to keep it from happeneing again. Why? The big ‘too big to fail banks and entrepenuers” are using the GOP to keep that from happening. You people really ought to do your ‘research’ better and more thorough….instead of listene ing to ‘right wing’ soundbites and the emotional demonization of politicians like ZBarney Frank and Chriss Dodd. Most of you really have: NO CLUE WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!
Posted by: CND FOX | October 20, 2011, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Posted by: CND FOX—It is the fault of the people that bought the house, the banks that loaned them the money and the government that made them loan the money. The people will pay the consequence by losing their home, the banks will lose money by have a non performing asset, and the government never pays for it mistakes.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | October 20, 2011, 11:54 am 11:54 am
CND FOX; Well, Barney Frank, the co-author of the sweeping financial regulatory reform bill signed into law last year, said in a recent interview with POLITICO that he didn’t see any conflict between supporting the OWS protests and taking financial services money. “If you take money from them, but you don’t vote for the things they want, how does that put you in conflict?” Frank questioned. Swell politician that Barney….burns the candle from both ends and doesn’t even have a problem with it.
Posted by: newcountryman | October 20, 2011, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Posted by: newcountryman—At least until he runs out of candle.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | October 20, 2011, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
SNEWSOME….I’ll repeat. You have ‘no clue’ what you are talking. You just have an ‘ideological opinion’. One third…SSNEWSOME …LET me reopeat that. 1/3′rd of our country is ‘underrwater’ on their mortgage today…as I speak. Now how do you ‘black and white blame’ two people for this mess when ‘anyone with a brain’ and who understands financing will tell you that the majority of our population NEEDS a home to establish any type of ‘net worth’ in their lifetime. You are IGNORING THE GREED FACTOR of those that took advantage of approximately 6-7% of poterntial homebuyers and RUINED IT (the housing market) and the financial system of the world. You have a myopic, naive belief if you think you can put the blame on two men…and the consumers who were LIED AND MISREPRESENTED to. This is PERFECT EXAMPLE of a need for a Consumer Protection Agency.i
Posted by: CND FOX | October 20, 2011, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
CND FOX–”And the sad part is that there is still no ‘solid regulations’ in place to keep it from happeneing again. Why? The big ‘too big to fail banks and entrepenuers” are using the GOP to keep that from happening. You people really ought to do your ‘research’ better and more thorough….instead of listene ing to ‘right wing’ soundbites and the emotional demonization of politicians like ZBarney Frank and Chriss Dodd”– Wow.. how clueless can you be?? Do me a favor and got to U-tube and search “Mortgage Crisis hearings” You’ll find several clips from CSpan (not a right wing blog – actual government videos from actaul congressional hearings) that date back to 2004 showing that it WAS REPUBLICANS who were attempting to get a grip on the impending mortgage crisis and DEMOCRATS (FRANK, DODD, AND WATERS in particular) who STOPPED THEM.. not only did they stop them, but they DEFENDED the Banks and Defended Freddie and Fannie.. When Banks actually addressed the government with concerns about the percentage of high risk loans being made under the CRA.. The Senate Commerce and Finance committee (controlled by Waters, Dodd, and Frank) reassurred the banks that as GSEs, Freddie and Fannie would “underwrite” any and all high risk loans and protect the banks.. Well they did just that… to the point that Franklin Rains( a massive Obama supporter) made 90 million working for the GSE during this period.. Meanwhile, Freddie and Fannie were laundering the bad loans by reselling the “upgraded” bundles back to the private banks..the banks made money, with the government’s blessing, then the government sold the bundles BACK to the banks under the direction of the Democratically held SCFC, then blamed the collapse on REPUBLICANS who had actually tried to STOP the process as early as 2004… YOU sir need to get your facts straight… you are clueless..
Posted by: arkie vet | October 20, 2011, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
CND FOX–”and who understands financing will tell you that the majority of our population NEEDS a home to establish any type of ‘net worth’ in their lifetime.”– And anyone who understands responsibility knows that you can’t “Create” net worth by approving a home loan for someone who can’t afford it.. yet this is what the banks did because they were told that it was their RESPONSIBILITY to do so under the CRA, and when they complained that it was an undue risk, they were told that the GSEs would protect them.. and YES probably not just two people, but the SCFC had a bout 30 members more than 20 of these were DEMOCRATS and THEY were responsible for the crisis..
Posted by: arkie vet | October 20, 2011, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Arkie Vet…..you are ‘looking at symptoms’…..not the root cause of the ‘disease’. I was a ‘lender’ through that time period. I know EXACTLY who and what is to blame. And 99% of those who ‘made a killing’ are still free as a bird and haven’t been criminally prosecuted likere they should have been. Just another example of ‘big money talking’ and free enterprise running ‘amok’. I am ‘far’ from clueless. And YOU need to rexamine and redefine ‘your facts’!
Posted by: CND FOX | October 20, 2011, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
And why would this crew of clowns discuss ANYTHING REAL or important while running for an office that NONE of them should hold except perhaps one. They AVOID the Real problems in our nation and those in Congress have worked very hard to make SURE they don’t ever address those problems in order to keep President Obama from winning a second term. I wish them ALL the worst for they are truly SCUM!
Posted by: demNme5 | October 20, 2011, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
CND FOX–”not the root cause of the ‘disease’. I was a ‘lender’ through that time period. I know EXACTLY who and what is to blame. And 99% of those who ‘made a killing’ are still free as a bird and haven’t been criminally prosecuted likere they should have been. Just another example of ‘big money talking’ and free enterprise running ‘amok’. I am ‘far’ from clueless. And YOU need to rexamine and redefine ‘your facts’– you may be far from clueless, but youa re certainly in a close relationship with propaganda.. Youa re right that a great persentage of those who made a killing are free as a bird.. Franklin Rains made 90 million over 7 years as head of Fannie.. NOTHING was done to him for selling TOXIC loan bundles BACK to the very banks that the GSE bought them from as a form of government “protection”…Barny Frank has nevr been prosecuted for the sweetheart deals he made fro Freddie and Fannie that led to them owning over 40% of all the current US mortgages and 90% of the “UNDERWATER” MORTGAGES. Maxine Waters was mnever held accountable for stymying Republican inquiries by saying the Franklin Rains was doing a GREAT job and that there was “absolutely nothing wrong with Freddie and Fannie”.. So let me ask you.. when you were a LENDER, and you saw the association that you worked for making bad loans for profit.. How do you know that they were doing it simply because they were greedy and NOT because they were being DIRECTED by the Senate Commerce and Finance Committee on how to APPLY the guidelines of the Community Reinvestment Act? More importantly, IF they were abusing the CRA rules for their own gain, then WHY were the Democrats in the SCFC, NOT PUTTING A STOP TO IT? .. that was their PRIMARY job after all – to monitor and control the banking community.. Don’t even bother to answer that CND.. most of us know the answer.. Never let a crisis go to waste, RIGHT??
Posted by: arkie vet | October 20, 2011, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
The Presidents solution to the housing crisis is open borders and allowing squatters rights. Giving the illegal immigrant immigrants a quick path to citizenship the President hopes to create a new dependant class of Democrats. The American people need to wake up and realize that over the past 20 years the “middle class” has been diluted by illegal immigrants. It is not the “Wealthy” which got richer it is the “middle class” who were left behind by cheap illegal labor!
Posted by: Common _ Sense | October 20, 2011, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
DEMINME5–”And why would this crew of clowns discuss ANYTHING REAL or important while running for an office that NONE of them should hold except perhaps one. They AVOID the Real problems in our nation and those in Congress have worked very hard to make SURE they don’t ever address those problems in order to keep President Obama from winning a second term. I wish them ALL the worst for they are truly SCUM”— Okay, first, they have discussed tax structure, balancing the budget, job creation, repealing Obama care before it destroys a significant portion of America’s small business, foriegn trade agreements, oru relationship with China (there are just some of the issues that have already been addresssed in speeches and debates).. So exactly what do you consider to be someting of “real importance” that they should be discussing?? Are they trying to keep Obama from being a two term president, yes.. I am pretty sure that’s what challengers ARE SUPPOSED TO DO… especially when Obama’s platform is in contradiction to what conservatives believe.. So let me make sure you are fully understood.. ANY political party who opposes the efforts of theother party is SCUM?? Right?? We are supposed to roll over and allow him to do whatever he wants whether or not we believe its the correct path.. So, if you want me to accept that assertion, then you simply have to do one thing — Submit a post that you supported everything BUSH did and wished the Democrats had gotten behind him while he was president and let him accomplish everthing he set out to accomplish.. If you will say that, I will retract my statement that you are WRONG to call the opposition “Scum”..
Posted by: arkie vet | October 20, 2011, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Arkie Vet …. what you (and so many like you) DON’T understand is that banks (like the one I worked for) who were strenuously regulated by auditors under the auspices of the FDIC…made very few bad loans in the crisis.For example….I never made one 0% down loan or any ‘no doc’ loan even though I had a 3rd party entity that would have accepted them. Why? Because I was NOT comfortable with them at all. You have ‘no clue’ how long into the ‘problem’ that resulted that Fannie and Freddie finally started to accept these loans. And to my knowledge they never accepted any ‘sub prime’ loans….the real cause of the mess. And the ONLY reason the ‘sub prime crap’ existed was because the big banks, the investment banks and those that ‘sold’ to them were NOT REGULATED by any entity. It was pure GREED and NO REGULATION that was the main fault of this implosion, not 6% of this nation trying to own a home for the first time in their life to build some net worth. That latter entity is what Mr. Frank and Dodd stood for. And having looked at thousands of middle class and blue collar peoples ‘financial statements’ and ‘net worths’….I totally agree with what they were triyng to do. They NEVER promoted the SUB-PRIME products.
Posted by: CND FOX | October 20, 2011, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
CND FOX | October 20, 2011, 1:58 pm —– You said “They NEVER promoted the SUB-PRIME products” ———– Per the National Review Online, Fannie and Freddie spewed out $1 trillion worth (face value) of subprime mortgages between 2005 and 2007. —– That’s a whole lot of toxic waste, protected by Frank and Dodd!! —— And that is EXACTLY the time-frame when the GOP made a bunch of inquiries about Fannie-Freddie….. see my last post!! — Your response??
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | October 20, 2011, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Loyal Opp….I will repeat. NONE of the 3rd Party entities that our institution sold through to Fannie and Freddie accepted those types of loans. And I would assume that other ‘mid-size and smaller Banks like ours experienced the same. In all my experience I have never heard anyone say that these two entities bought that crap. That was the work of investment banks and like institutions.
Posted by: CND FOX | October 20, 2011, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
CND FOX | October 20, 2011, 2:27 pm —- And the Dems in control of Fannie-Freddy (my point)!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | October 20, 2011, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
CND FOX–”And the ONLY reason the ‘sub prime crap’ existed was because the big banks, the investment banks and those that ‘sold’ to them were NOT REGULATED by any entity. It was pure GREED and NO REGULATION that was the main fault of this implosion, not 6% of this nation trying to own a home for the first time in their life to build some net worth. That latter entity is what Mr. Frank and Dodd stood for. And having looked at thousands of middle class and blue collar peoples ‘financial statements’ and ‘net worths’….I totally agree with what they were triyng to do. They NEVER promoted the SUB-PRIME products”— First, the big banks DID have a “Regulator entity” that was the JOB of the Senate Commerce and Finance committee Chaired by Waters and controlled by Frank and Dodd.. With the repeal of Glass/Steagal in 1998, the industry was greatly deregulated for the sole purpose of allowing smaller banks to compete with larger banks by relaxing the rules for loan approval..but the regulation of the industry did not go away, it was placed in the hands of the Senate Commerce and finance committee to monitor. If the BIG BANKS were not Regulated as you say, then THAT is the fault of the very people you are trying to commend because it was THEIR JOB to regulate the banks..They failed and not only did they fail, but when questioned about it, they denied that there was a problem…I have no problem with 6% of the nation trying to own a home for the first time, but the percentage of Sub primes that went into the bundles accounted for a far greater percentage of the mortgages than 6%.. My biggest complaint with laying this completely at the feet of the big banks is that even some of the big banks questioned the level of high risk loans that were being approved and the SCFC reassured them that what they were doing was okay and their interests (and profits) would be protected by the GSEs… I appreciate that you refrained from making zero down loans in your job.. seems that you were aware of the potential problem and worked to NOT contribute to it…I have a nephew who got out of the business for the same reason, but your statement that there was no regulation is wrong.. Frank, Dodd, and Waters WERE the regulators and they FAILED.. not only did they fail, but they reassured the banks and made the problem worse, then in session, denied that there was a problem and doubled down on their own mis management… the banks are NOT without fault, but they are far from the only one’s at fault.. the very peoplle you say did a great job, are the one’s who made the situation much worse… I know this is hard for you as a far left winger to accept, but DEMOCRATS deregualted the industry, then DEMOCRATS (Waters, Frank and Dodd) USED the deregulation to mis-manage the system and made the problem FAR worse..
Posted by: arkie vet | October 20, 2011, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
The government can’t utilize Fannie and Freddie as a tool to back-door stimulus programs at the expense of their shareholders.
Fannie and Freddie have had a cost: more than 4.5 million modification arrangements were started between April 2009 and April 2011, according to Treasury.
The government ought to pay FnF for this cost and future costs.
U.S.A. is not the Hugo Chavez’ Vezenuela.
Posted by: Ebano | October 22, 2011, 4:15 am 4:15 am
arkie vet | October 20, 2011, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm …..While many of those to the right of left/progressive will admit the banks had some culpability, those on the left/progressives will fight tooth and nail supporting Waters, Frank and Dodd. The Dodd-Frank bill has done very little to regulate “too big to fail” while creating choas in the financial community.
Posted by: deanbob | October 22, 2011, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
I think CND FOX “is” Barney Frank.
Posted by: newcountryman | October 23, 2011, 8:48 am 8:48 am