Oct 27, 2011 6:33pm

Loss of Life in Major Computer Attack, Warns Homeland Security

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said today that a major computer attack against critical U.S. infrastructure could result in a loss of life and massive economic damages.

“The network intrusion that shuts down the nation’s critical infrastructure .. . could cause loss of life but also a huge economic loss.” Napolitano said at a cybersecurity event sponsored by the Washington Post.   “We’ve seen attempts on Wall Street, transportation systems, things of those sorts.”

Cybersecurity experts have long warned that hackers could target electrical grids and power plants, which could affect hospitals and water treatment plants.

Napolitano also said DHS offices had been probed in computer intrusions by hackers attempting to infiltrate the department’s systems, although Napolitano declined to comment on the specifics of the intrusions or specify if the intrusions had specifically targeted her office.

Napolitano discussed a wide range of computer security issues at the event and urged Congress to push forward with cybersecurity legislation that the White House proposed had in May.  Despite the partisan rancor that often comes from Congress, Napolitano said she hoped the legislation could gain strong bipartisan support.

“Cyber attacks are increasing in frequency, in complexity  and in consequence,” Napolitano said. “In [fiscal year] 2011 alone, our U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team, CERT, responded to more than 100,000 incident reports and released more than 5,000 actionable cybersecurity alerts and information products.”

Although the DHS Secretary declined to address specific instances, there have been a slew of high-profile hacking intrusions in the past 2 years:

  • The FBI and U.S. Secret Service are investigating intrusions into computer systems run by NASDAQ-OMX, the parent company of the NASDAQ stock exchange, which were compromised last year.
  • Earlier this year RSA, the security division of the EMC Corp., suffered a computer intrusion that resulted in a breach of its firm’s   intellectual property, Secure ID, which provides encrypted authentication services.
  • During 2009, groups in China were behind a highly sophisticated hacking of Google and more than 30 other companies that went undetected until January 2010.

“We are in a constant state of seeing activity against critical infrastructure,” said Greg Schaffer, DHS assistant secretary for cybersecurity and communications, who also spoke at Thursday’s event.

U.S. officials believe that China had been behind many of the infiltrations; members of Congress have recently  mentioned this, but diplomatic and security officials are more reluctant to attribute the infiltrations  to China.

Last week, Shawn Henry, the FBI’s executive assistant director, also highlighted the damage a major computer attack could have on the United States.

“The cyberthreat is an existential one, meaning that a major cyberattack could potentially wipe out whole companies,” Henry said in a speech in Baltimore Oct. 20.  “It could shut down our electric grid or water supply. It could cause serious damage to parts of our cities, and ultimately, even kill people. While it may sound alarmist, the threat is incredibly real, and intrusions into corporate networks, personal computers  and government systems are occurring every single day by the thousands.”

Henry proposed having a separate Internet architecture set up for critical infrastructure assets.

“U.S. innovation and ingenuity created the Internet, which is now a global phenomenon that has provided tremendous opportunities. With it, however, have come tremendous security challenges to certain users. For them, the current system will never be good enough. But it’s too late to disconnect. It’s not possible to be offline anymore, and there’s currently no alternative.” Henry said. “I don’t have the answers about how to build greater choices in the security architectures used today, but I do feel strongly that the discussions must begin now.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

With this nimrod running DHS we are almost certainly in trouble.

Posted by: Nope | October 27, 2011, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Cyber attacks are increasing because instead of spending our money to improve our power grids and infrastructure and upgrading technologies that make them safe, you’re too busy spending all our money building bigger bombs and blowing up other countries, then rebuilding them so you can blow them up again over and over and over. If you spent half the money you spend on death and destruction, always looking for new ways to deny benefits to veterans and old, sick and disabled people and CHILDREN and shut down the war machine and used that money to better America, everyone would be safe and sound and way better off with enough to even satisfy the disgusting greed of the top 1 percent enough to lessen their quest to starve, cheat and steal from the rest of us.

Posted by: Laura Nason | October 28, 2011, 12:10 am 12:10 am

DHS is a complete mess. Bureaucracy at its heaving, lurching worst, chewing up resources that could be put to much better use in lowering healthcare costs, providing food, shelter, education, and re-training for jobs in this country. But no… not enough people fell for the bogeymen in the skies, so now, she’s telling us they’re in the wires, too. You’ve seen how the TSA handles “security” and “protection.” You really think DHS will do a better job on the data protection front? On top of everything else, she’s ready to roll out a plan that hires 3,000 people to “help” (as in, “we’re from the government, and we’re here to help”) in 2012. That’s why she’s looking for a fast decision from Congress. I want a fast decision, too. I want them to tell her “NO.”

Posted by: FreeCitizen | October 28, 2011, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Is this the same Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano who said that we have NO problem with illegals coming into the country, our borders are safe and secure.

Posted by: Lizzie | October 28, 2011, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Anyone who connects critical infrastructure to the Internet is, by definition, screwing up by the numbers. While no computer controlled system can be perfectly safe (Stuxnet was passed by USB drive, after all), it’s criminally negligent to attach any computer running important hardware to the public internet.

Posted by: Harper Shelby | October 28, 2011, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.