Oct 24, 2011 4:16pm

Obama Campaign Draws Fire for Tapping Former Lobbyist for Senior Adviser Post

ap barack obama budget ll 110215 wblog Obama Campaign Draws Fire for Tapping Former Lobbyist for Senior Adviser Post

Charles Dharapak/AP Photo

President Obama’s re-election team today appointed former corporate lobbyist and veteran Democratic attorney Broderick Johnson as a senior adviser for the 2012 campaign.

Johnson, who volunteered for Obama in 2008, has spent the past three years lobbying federal lawmakers on behalf of Microsoft, Comcast Corp., FedEx, Ford and TransCanada, among other corporate clients, according to public records.

His “revolving door profile” with the Center for Responsive Politics shows that before he worked as a lobbyist Johnson spent several years as counsel on congressional committees, and later as congressional liaison to the House during the last two years of the Clinton administration.

He joined the private sector in 2000 as an in-house lobbyist for AT&T and BellSouth before joining the law firm Bryan Cave in 2007.

Johnson’s appointment, in spite of Obama’s effort to cast himself as an enemy of corporate lobbyists and moneyed interests, immediately drew fire from environmental groups, which said Johnson’s ties to the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline violated the president’s pledge to remain free from lobbyists’ influence while in office.

The Obama administration is weighing approval of the deal, which is sought by TransCanada, a former Johnson client.

“President Obama ran for office in 2008 promising that the days of lobbyists setting the agenda in Washington were over, yet now he’s hired a top oil pipeline lobbyist into his campaign,” said Kim Huynh of Friends of the Earth, in a statement. “This is a deeply troubling development.”

Johnson formally deregistered as a lobbyist in April, records show, and no longer represents TransCanada or his other clients.  The Obama campaign also said it does not accept contributions from registered lobbyists or political action committees, unlike their Republican counterparts.

Obama’s campaign team said Johnson would serve “as a national surrogate for the campaign and our representative in meetings with key leaders, communities and organizations.”

“Broderick will be an ear to the ground for the campaign’s political and constituency operations, helping to ensure that there is constant, open communication between the campaign and our supporters around the country,” the campaign said in a statement announcing the hire.

Johnson, whom campaign manager Jim Messina called an “invaluable adviser,” is believed to be the highest-ranking African-American on the Obama campaign team.

Johnson said in a statement he accepted the post “with great pride and a strong sense of duty.”

Johnson’s wife, Michele Norris, co-host of NPR’s “All Things Considered,” said in a statement on the company website that she would step down from her post through the campaign to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest.

SHOWS:

User Comments

Wasn’t the elimination of such things one of the cornerstones of Obama’s 2008 campaign? Add another to his list.

Posted by: newcountryman | October 24, 2011, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Jake- didn’t the Obama administration give itself lots of waivers to hire other lobbyists, earlier in the admin? I remember you asking for documentation of the waiver process, but I don’t remember you ever receiving it.

IMO, the problem is in pretending lobbyists are somehow worse than CEOs of a corporation, presidents of unions, or lawyers. They are all advocates for a position and there is nothing wrong with American citizens or groups of citizens seeking representation. The problem is entirely with a government that has lots of money and favor to give out, and a desire to give the money or favor to groups willing to do whatever it takes to curry favor.

Posted by: MayBee | October 24, 2011, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

So what’s new?

Posted by: Freedom | October 24, 2011, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

I guess there is no hope for any change

Posted by: allen | October 24, 2011, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Wasn’t the elimination of such things one of the cornerstones of Obama’s 2008 campaign? Add another to his list.

POSTED BY: NEWCOUNTRYMAN | OCTOBER 24, 2011, 4:28 PM 4:28 PM

The promise was very straight forward. No lobbyists coming directly into the admnistration and no members of the administration going directly into lobbying. The period on either side was two years if remembered correctly. This has been the practise of the administration other than the odd exception made.

The Republicans have made absolutely NO commitments to reduce the back and forth open door between lobbyists and administrations – nothing. The grotesqueness of the Republican position would be VP Cheney who went directly from CEO of Halliburton (a war and oil company), to a major position of influence in funding Halliburton and guaranteeing excellent war profits for Halliburtion.

Posted by: Blue Tooth | October 24, 2011, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Solyndra-linked fundraiser still boosting Obama campaign

Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 24, 2011, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Solyndra-linked fundraiser still boosting Obama campaign

POSTED BY: WHERESMYMONEY | OCTOBER 24, 2011, 6:50 PM 6:50 PM

If a business failure disqualified you from being involved in politics, George W. Bush would never have been considered for President.

Posted by: Jane | October 24, 2011, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

NLRB withholds Information In Boeing Scandal, Investigation, Gets Stern Response from Congress

“Not only do these emails undermine the independence of the Office of the General Counsel,” Rep. Issa wrote, “but they also indicate that the NLRB is acting as a ‘rogue agency’ that believes it does not have to answer to Congress.”

SOUND FAMILIAR?

Continues:
Interestingly, after Judicial Watch released these emails to the public, the “rogue agency” still excluded them from a subsequent production to the Committee! “This is troubling and creates the appearance that you discovered these emails, realized they were damaging to the NLRB, and intentionally withheld them from the Committee,” Issa charged.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 24, 2011, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

If a business failure disqualified you from being involved in politics, George W. Bush would never have been considered for President.
Posted by: Jane | October 24, 2011, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

That wouldn’t apply to Obama since he was never in business before running. He still hasn’t been in business. Only 3 1/2 years of dividing the country and constant campaigning.

Jake, how about doing a story on how many days Obama has been in Washington since his last vacay? Golfing at the AFB doesn’t count. Being at the WH, at least pretending to work only.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 24, 2011, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Only 3 1/2 years of dividing the country and constant campaigning.
Jake, how about doing a story on how many days Obama has been in Washington since his last vacay?

POSTED BY: WHERESMYMONEY | OCTOBER 24, 2011, 7:10 PM 7:10 PM

Boy are the right wing EVER stupid. Check Bush and Reagan’s vacation records vs. Obama. Those two 1% elitists too many multiple times the vacation days taken by Obama.

By the way, Obama has been a huge successful with marketing his two very successful products – his own books – unlike George W. Bush who was a failure in business unless propped up by the money of his dad and his oil baron friends. Bush proved to be a failure with business and the economy while in office as well.

Posted by: Jane | October 24, 2011, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

I would say he done flip flopped again but he didn’t on this one. This is just another broken campaign promise. My bad.

Posted by: CajunW | October 24, 2011, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

This is just another broken campaign promise.

POSTED BY: CAJUNW | OCTOBER 24, 2011, 7:26 PM 7:26 PM

Not at all.

The promise was very straight forward. No lobbyists coming directly into the admnistration and no members of the administration going directly into lobbying. The period on either side was two years if remembered correctly. This has been the practise of the administration other than the odd exception made.

The Republicans have made absolutely NO commitments to reduce the back and forth open door between lobbyists and administrations – nothing. The grotesqueness of the Republican position would be VP Cheney who went directly from CEO of Halliburton (a war and oil company), to a major position of influence in funding Halliburton and guaranteeing excellent war profits for Halliburtion.

Posted by: Blue Tooth | October 24, 2011, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

blue tooth The period on either side was two years if remembered correctly+++I don’t think so. Since when do promises come with a expiration date and when does the breaking of any promise have an excuse as an odd exception?

Posted by: allen | October 24, 2011, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

People do strange things when desperate. It reminds me of a rat chewing off its own let to try to extricate themself out of the trap!!

Posted by: Common _ Sense | October 24, 2011, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

The surprise here is that ABC printed this story. Why can’t the Obama loyalists just admit their guy says one thing and does another….a lot. Just admit it. Your negative claims against Republicans, against President Bush are simply background noise. Obama said whatever he thought people wanted to hear and went ahead with business as usual in Chicago style. The truth is out there. At last.

Posted by: pam | October 24, 2011, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Good. The fact he hasn’t hired the usual political hacks has hurt him. If you can’t beat them join them.

Posted by: Secondlook | October 24, 2011, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

“President Obama ran for office in 2008 promising that the days of lobbyists setting the agenda in Washington were over, yet now he’s hired a top oil pipeline lobbyist into his campaign,” said Kim Huynh.
Bluetooth, I’m afraid this is more than the odd exception!

And what does Bush’s policy have to do with Obama’s ? All though I will say this, Obama is even better than Bush at that drone policy. I was afraid he wouldn’t have the nerve, but he’s doing a bang up job!

Posted by: CajunW | October 24, 2011, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

blue tooth The period on either side was two years if remembered correctly+++I don’t think so. Since when do promises come with a expiration date and when does the breaking of any promise have an excuse as an odd exception?

POSTED BY: ALLEN | OCTOBER 24, 2011, 8:15 PM 8:15 PM

Jeesh, it’s not that difficult to comprehend – the policy is that a person can’t have worked as a lobbyist for two years before joining the administration and can’t work as a lobbyist for two years after leaving the relationship.

This has been the practise of the administration other than the odd exception made. Waivers were put in place for this situation and have been rarely used.

The Republicans have made absolutely NO commitments to reduce the back and forth open door between lobbyists and administrations – nothing. The grotesqueness of the Republican position would be VP Cheney who went directly from CEO of Halliburton (a war and oil company), to a major position of influence in funding Halliburton and guaranteeing excellent war profits for Halliburton.

Posted by: Blue Tooth | October 24, 2011, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

The Republicans have made absolutely NO commitments to reduce the back and forth open door between lobbyists and administrations – nothing. +++Neither has Obama….Another campaign lie pure and simple and cannot be denied. Anybody that thinks otherwise is an idiot. He is one and done..

Posted by: allen | October 24, 2011, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

The Republicans have made absolutely NO commitments to reduce the back and forth open door between lobbyists and administrations – nothing. +++Neither has Obama….Another campaign lie pure and simple and cannot be denied. Anybody that thinks otherwise is an idiot. He is one and done..

POSTED BY: ALLEN | OCTOBER 24, 2011, 10:07 PM 10:07 PM

Wrong. Open government groups have given Obama high marks for reducing the number of lobbyists at the White House and for making the process more transparent than other administrations.

“I think that by any fair measure … the reported number is certainly much fewer,” said Meredith McGehee, policy director for the Campaign Legal Center. “In fact, I’d say the waivers are good. It allows them to go in and say, ‘Here’s someone we think has unique skills.’ ”

The Republicans have made absolutely NO commitments to reduce the back and forth open door between lobbyists and administrations – nothing.

The choice is between the NOTHING offered regarding reducing lobbyists by the Republicans, and the huge reduction in lobbyists under the Democrats and Obama.

Posted by: Blue Tooth | October 24, 2011, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

President Obama can choose anyone he wants to work in his election campaign and I will back him all the way to the election. The GOP has made war on the President, the middle class, the working poor, the economy, the health care that will help so many people, and a decent life in this country. As long as these thugs against solutions are lying their heads off about success after success that President Obama has they are no good.

Posted by: Vicki | October 24, 2011, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Blue Tooth; Doesn’t change a thing. Obama said he wasn’t going to do it. Didn’t say a thing about the “odd exception” rule. Quit defending the indefensible.

Posted by: newcountryman | October 25, 2011, 7:23 am 7:23 am

In some areas, it is difficult to find an expert who hasn’t taken corporate money at some point, either directly through a job or grant, especially in scientific fields.
This appointment might be in the same vein, or not.

Posted by: Librarian53 | October 25, 2011, 7:55 am 7:55 am

BLUE TOOTH, he was elected because of all the promises he made, to change Washington and the way things were done, now he is worse then the last few administrations. Things like if you don’t contribute a lot of money no paybacks. Now all he does is blame everyone else for the problems and goes after wallstreet, when they contribute more money to him then anyone, my guess is he tells them behind CLOSED doors its just a ploy.

Posted by: Lizzie | October 25, 2011, 9:36 am 9:36 am

flipflopflipflopflipflopflipflop

Posted by: daniel | October 25, 2011, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Crony capitalism…..another example of the administration lobbying corporations as opposed to corporations lobbying the government. The Wall Street mob might want to consider moving their makeshift village to Pennsylvania Avenue.

Posted by: ctbobster | November 5, 2011, 7:04 am 7:04 am

The big “0″ MUST be removed from Office by any means possible:
1. Fast and Furious – Illegal movement of guns into Mexico
2. Solyndra, SunPower, First Solar, Beacon Power – Bankrupt
3. Lybia – unauthorized by Congress, bypassing the war powers act
4. Backdoor Amnesty for Illegals – Executive Fiat passed while Congress was on vacation
5. ObamaCare – provides free health care for illegals via migrant workers clinics
6. Apology Tour – apologizing to arab countries for America
7. Arab Spring – Obama support for Arab revolutions, destabilizing governments and putting radical Islamists in power.
8. Continuously funneling tax payer $$ into failed companies to get campaign contributions.
——-I could list more.
OBAMA MUST GO !!!
Write your rep in Washington and complain
House of Representatives: WRITEREP dot HOUSE dot GOV
Senate: SENATE dot Gov

Posted by: David | November 5, 2011, 7:52 am 7:52 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.