Oct 1, 2011 6:41pm

Rick Perry Says Drug War ‘May Require Our Military in Mexico’

ap Rick Perry New Hampshire jt 111001 wblog Rick Perry Says Drug War May Require Our Military in Mexico

(Charles Krupa/AP Photo)

Texas Gov. Rick Perry spent today campaigning in New Hampshire, hammering away at his message that “over-taxation, over-regulation, and over-litigation” are hurting business and the U.S. economy, but he also advocated for a larger government role in the war on drugs.

At a house party in Manchester, Perry said that ending the drug war in Mexico “may require our military in Mexico.”

“The way that we were able to stop the drug cartels in Colombia was with a coordinated effort,” Perry said. “It may require our military in Mexico working in concert with them to kill these drug cartels and to keep them off of our border and to destroy their networks. I don’t know all the scenarios that are out there but I think it is very important that we work with them, to keep that country from failing.”

The comments raise questions about whether the governor would support military action by executive order. Perry has long supported sending U.S. troops to Mexico to help with the drug war.

Over and over Perry said that as president he would be sure to shrink the role of Washington, D.C., in the lives of Americans.

Complete with colorful props, Perry vowed to do away with as much of the health care law passed by Congress — what he referred to as “Obamacare” — as he could. At one stop he pulled out the Sharpie he said he would use to sign it away. At another stop, he pulled out his pocket Constitution, saying that “Obamacare” wasn’t in there.

At every stop, Perry was questioned about the Texas bill giving out-of-state tuition to children of illegal immigrants. He said it was a state solution to a state problem and that as president, he would uphold the 10th Amendment. He said that he did not support the Dream Act.

Many seemed satisfied with Perry’s justification for signing the Texas bill. Bill Connors, who first asked the governor about his stance, said he came to the town hall in Hampton sure that he would not be voting for Perry. But based on Perry’s justification, he said he was now “thinking about it.”

When questioned about his stance on global warming, Perry reiterated that he’s a “skeptic.”

“The issue is, are we as Americans going to jeopardize the future of this country economically, by putting into place a program that there are still enough skeptics in my book, to stand with them, and say, you know what, I don’t believe that man-made global warming is settled in science enough for us to justify an economic impact on this country that could be devastating for the future,” he said.

But on the subject of off-shore drilling, he said, “We have to be thoughtful; we use science on how we protect our environment. But we’ve got to get back to drilling.”

Asked about American manufacturing and bringing jobs back to the United States, Perry said it was cap-and-trade policies that were causing companies to go overseas and do business.

Perry also revealed that he was consulting with Steve Forbes regarding his economic and monetary policy. Perry and Forbes met during Perry’s recent trip to New York.

“I think at the end of the day, Perry will win the nomination, and I think he’ll win the election,” Forbes said.

ABC News’ Michael Falcone contributed to this article.

SHOWS:

User Comments

The biggest farce the GOP has tried to convince people is that they want small government…. It’s more like, small government (preferably none) for the issues the don’t like, BIG (HUGE) government for the issues they do like…

Posted by: what the deuce? | October 1, 2011, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

““We have to be thoughtful; we use science on how we protect our environment”, except that Perry the moron does believe or accept science, so I wonder what he’s talking about, AGAIN

Posted by: JR | October 1, 2011, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Boots on the ground in Mexico? Huh? Before this guy gets the job he’s designing a war for us? There were rumors George Bush had one (a war) in mind before he too was elected. Hmmmm, v_e_r_y interesting.

Posted by: newz4i | October 1, 2011, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Keep our troops out of Mexico.

Posted by: Kathleen | October 1, 2011, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

What the Deuce: Precisely!!!

Posted by: phantomniter | October 1, 2011, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

NO more wars, keep the troops on the border.

Posted by: phantomniter | October 1, 2011, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Here’s a novel idea. How about controlling the gun flow that goes from the United States to Mexico. Does the gun manufacturing lobby (NRA) have too much power? Because you gotta know they have made hundreds of millions of dollars by selling guns to people that sell guns to Mexican drug cartels. How about NOT going into another war and just cut off the supply of weapons! Ohh, now I understand. The same people that make guns that end up in the hands of the bad guys make guns for our military. I guess this is the Tea Party way for government to stimulate the economy. We’ve always known the GOP would rather spend money on bombs and bullets than hospitals and doctors.

Posted by: dan | October 1, 2011, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Isn’t it ironic, I can see why Perry wants this. Texas is reaping the most benefits from our
government (military) thsan any state in the union. The US government pumps 100′s of millions
into his local economies giving us the impression that they seem better than normal.
How about moving a couple of those bases right on the border! If not then let’s start diverting these
bases across the country. I’m sure Arizona would be happy to place one on their border.

Posted by: michael | October 1, 2011, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

There they go again. War..War…War…and more War , as if that’s what we need now, while millions are out of work. Guys, this is not about fighting drug trafficking, or its all about starting another war and making profit out of it. plain and simple. Thats the GOP agenda. Make war, cuz its the easiest way to rip billions from the government to fund it. This is the GOP mentality that has screwed this country and is crippling america right now. Greed, greed and more greed….and Perry WILL lead us directly into another war in Mexico. BEWARE!

Posted by: Louis4Louis | October 1, 2011, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Perry is scared he may not win the nomination, after all. So, he is grooming Forbes as a running mate, hoping that will help.

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | October 1, 2011, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Saaay! This is the perfect opportunity for all those wingers who’re so quick tell everyone how THEY – the “real” patriots – would handle drug dealers and guarding the border. Join up, you guys, the line forms on the right.

Posted by: Cassandra | October 1, 2011, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

A war on Terror (exterminate the Cartels in Mexico Hell Yes) This would give the people of Mexico a true chance at becoming a little America. Why not Liberate them ,Mexico would become a south of the border Canada that speaks Spanish and the Illegal Allen problem ?
The Annexing of Mexico would bring job specially the to the law enforcement agency…1836

Posted by: DJS | October 1, 2011, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

This guy is worse than George Bush. Scary!

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | October 1, 2011, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Neocon on steroids.

Posted by: Secondlook | October 1, 2011, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

This is the most dangerous guy in America today. If he became president, America’s credit rating would sink to junk bond status within his first 100 days in office. He’s Bush 43 with better clothes and looser lips. I believe he thinks it’s a sign of weakness to think before you speak. He’s the epitome of the loose cannon. He has the hubris to accuse the US Government of committing criminal fraud for 75 years; he thinks he knows more that the thousands of professionals who have worked on or with the Social Security Administration, who never picked up on the fact that Social Security is a Ponzi scheme: what do they know? They are only forensic accountants, attorneys, judges, and other like dopes. but he, an Ag school graduate, figured it out.

A combination of hubris, stupidity, ignorance, and one dimensional thinking would make for the worst possible president in our history. I bet that he doesn’t even know the legal definition of “Ponzi Scheme”. If he did, he never would have made his headline seeking statement about Social Security. Bachman is bad, but this guy would be the worst news for America since the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. The tragedy of 9/11 would pale in comparison with the country-wide damage this man could do, if elected president. I’m 77, flew for 11 years as a Navy pilot, work as a volunteer at my local VA Medical Center, but I think I’d move to Canada if he were elected. Shame on the RNC for letting him run with their endorsement.

Posted by: excfo | October 1, 2011, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

For those that do not know what “Neocon” means =Neoconservatism in the United States is a branch of American conservatism that is most known for its advocacy of using American economic and military power to topple American enemies and promote liberal democracy in other countries. The movement emerged during the early 1970s among Democrats who favored a negotiated settlement rather than an immediate withdrawal to end the Vietnam War and who had become skeptical of the Great Society’s welfare programs. Although neoconservatives generally endorse free-market economics, they often believe cultural and moral issues to be more significant, and so have tended to be less thoroughgoing in opposition to government intervention in society than more traditionally conservative and libertarian members of the Republican Party.[1][2] Most neoconservatives supported a military response to the Taliban in Afghanistan and many supported liberating Iraq from Sadam Hussein, although some have made criticisms of the scope and conduct of both wars.

Posted by: DJS | October 1, 2011, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

He doesn’t believe that all the [bleep] we’ve put into the atmosphere has an impact on the planet. And he won’t believe it as long as he and his buddies are making money off poluting industries. THAT’S science to the wealthy.

Posted by: Cassandra | October 1, 2011, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

How is the (Great Society’s welfare programs) working out the rich get rich and we the people bail them out…I say Action Stations Middle America And we shall beat to quarters

Posted by: DJS | October 1, 2011, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Just tell ATF to stop running leaky gun “stings” and legalize marijuana here. Let people grow the stuff on their lanais or in their own yards: make it of no or at least very little commercial value. That – all by itself – will cut far into the drug cartels’ pockets, and so reduce the violence. It is the very same lesson we already learned (or should have learned) in 1933.

Posted by: JLS1950 | October 1, 2011, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

And O blunders promise” Change” Oh ya we got it, two recessions.. The bail out of bank that reneged on home loans ( there one in the same ) High unemployment due to the government keeping a 35% tax on company’s that also have to pay 70-80% of your heath insurance…All you Parry haters And Bust haters Haven’t got a clue… Our country make progress through War It is the foundation of our economy.What sells more than Oil,? Answer Bullets and Arms.

Posted by: DJS | October 1, 2011, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

The old saying “They make em bigger in Texas” no longer applies. The new saying ” they make em DUMB (George W. Bush) and DUMBER (Rick Perry) in Texas has now been chosen.

Posted by: Steve | October 1, 2011, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

He is already history and doesn’t know it

Posted by: george | October 1, 2011, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Its coming…

Posted by: Michael | October 1, 2011, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Overcompensated. He went from being “weak” on immigration to all out rough and hard.

Posted by: omgbreathe | October 1, 2011, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

mr. perry is a punk with a mountain lion mouth and a gooney bird brain… the only way to stop the drug war here in the USA and in mexico is to stop people like rush limbaugh from spending billions of dollars on illegal drugs south of the border.

Posted by: thomas w | October 1, 2011, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

Rick Perry = George W. Bush lite. Haven’t we had enough of tough-talking, but liberal-governing phony conservatives? Rick Perry’s views are not those of the TEA Party or any other folks who value national sovereignty and limited government. Perry swaggers and talks Texan with the best of them, but is AWOL on principle. And yes, Governor, I do have a heart… but also a head. Quit selling out America to Mexico!

Posted by: Jim in WNC | October 1, 2011, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

I want a war on drug CARTELS — not on DRUGS. Legalize drugs and attack the real problem.

Posted by: cm | October 1, 2011, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

I can’t believe the USA are fighting in some way with one of there nieghbouring contries, I always thought they should be treated as an asset and even make this counrty one of there states, they could be and would be in my view asitance in many wat in the med to long term. It is alway a good lesson those who a diruptive, give them a job on the committee!

Posted by: Stephen | October 1, 2011, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

The ‘ol cowboy ain’t lookin’ too good is he? Check out that picture. Without the makeup he looks like an unmade bed. It”s OK, he’s got a brain to match. Yeah I think that’s a great idea too, sending our soldiers down to Mexico to get killed by drug dealers. After all, it’s what they signed up for isn’t it?

Posted by: Keith Ward | October 1, 2011, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

With talk of another Military engagement, the GOP might as well hand the Re-Election to President Obama on a silver platter!

Posted by: JamesOnly | October 1, 2011, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

The more you know about him the less you will like him.

Posted by: Jeff burge | October 1, 2011, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

That’s right. As the war on terror dies down. Let’s figure out a way to continue the ‘perpetual war’. The military industrial complex must be refreshed with new moneys for the rich and new blood of the poor. What a joke.

Posted by: Leo | October 1, 2011, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Sending our troops into Mexico is a bad idea. It would be disrepectful and likely waste a lot of money. Perhaps he thought his comments would deflect attention from the beating he took from Republicans in Florida for his position on immigration, a position I generally agree with him on. Perry is quite clueless on foreign policy. I believe we need to be giving aid to Mexico to support their government and their troops and law enforcement for battling against the drug gangs. And we need to crack down on our side for the weapons shipments since these drug gangs are buying firearms in the US and shipping them into Mexico. I think Perry overall is a rather poor candidate for President and I will vote for Obama rather than him. I think the only potential chance Republicans have against Obama is Mitt Romney, and even then Mitt Romney may end up being a sacrificial candidate. Republicans overall are rather insecure and prone to get the US involved in military conflicts that have little strategic significance other than they waste a lot of government taxpayer money.

Posted by: Scott | October 1, 2011, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Our troops can’t be used on the border to keep the ILLEGALS out, but we can send them into Mexico to fight their battles? Really? Anything else we can do for them? Sick to death of Americans coming last in line!

Posted by: sosideirish | October 1, 2011, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

America does not need to send troops into Mexico. For starters the Mexican people woulld roit in the streets of every city in Mexico if U.S. Armed Forces entered the country. I live in El Paso and work in one of the public school districts which has many recently relocated Mexican children whose families have fled the violence of the drug war. I can tell you first hand that American troops would not be welcomed! What would end the war on drugs and stop the violence in Mexico is a dramatic change in U.S. policy by ending the war on drugs here in the United States. Unless you can stop the demand for drugs you will never stop the the flow of drugs into this country. The military efforts in Coloumbia only drove the cartels north into Mexico. America Dr. Ron Paul has the solution to the drug war. RON PAUL 2012

Posted by: tonyrome | October 1, 2011, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Under Perry, Mexico will just be the gateway to invade Central and South America, the Caribbean and Cuba and thanks to Obama’s ignorance of the Constitution, if any of us don’t like it, he can just have us targeted with a drone launched missile and take us out. No charges, no trial, no mess.

Posted by: mike | October 1, 2011, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

great idea, american troops in Mexico to stop the drug trade and mexican troops in the United States to kill all the drug users, problem solved I agree with DJS, except it might be dumb and dumbest

Posted by: enrique jasso | October 1, 2011, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

This is his response for making the wrong decision to give illegals in state tuition. Now he wants to sound tough, sorry Rick that” rock won’t roll”. What an insane statement for an individual to make running for the nomination of the Republican party or any party. The guy did not want to build the fence because of the Latino vote, what a hypocrite. His only support comes from the crazies in the party, the bible thumping religious fanatics and tea bagging wacko’s who have lost favor with the Independents and the American public as a whole. Their antics in the house, creating a crisis over wanting to attach program cut to every bills proves they cannot govern. The public is sick of the no compromise, my way or the highway crowd. We must rid the house and senate of everyone of the tea baggers(obstructionists) in 2012.

Posted by: packeryman | October 1, 2011, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Is this guy on drugs?

Posted by: Blah-blah-blah | October 1, 2011, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Just another war add to the growing list of countries we are bombing and destroying making the world even more unsafe to live.
For republicans like Perry foreign war is another area to make money -time to buy more ‘defense stock’.
Its agreat time to be alive if you are the CEOs of Boeing , Raytheon and British Aerospace.
Perry’s sublimimal message “Another war my rich republican friends —-another profit center!”

Posted by: Steve | October 2, 2011, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Rick has a gun, why doesn’t he just go shoot all the bad guys is Mexico instead of using US Troops.

Posted by: Ron Spear | October 2, 2011, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb.
The drug wars in Mexico are none of our business. Fighting them is another war we cannot win. We need to close all military bases on foreign soil and use those troops on our boder, not south of it. Keep the drugs, illegal aliens and most of all the violence in Mexico. Let them do what ever they want to do, as long as they do it down there. Put our military on our border to make sure it stays down there. If they want to kill each other, it’s not our problem.

Posted by: oonogil | October 2, 2011, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Is anyone surprised by this. GOP solutions almost always involves the military. I can see it now: If Perry gets elected troops are sent to Mexico. Of course, Perry will not raise taxes to pay for this so, in typical GOP fashion when it comes to the military, it will be a case of spend and owe. After it turns into a fiasco and Perry’s term in office is finished, a Democrat will be elected and have to deal with cleaning the mess up. The GOP will resist all efforts to do so and blame the whole mess on the Democrats.

Posted by: Thinks2010 | October 2, 2011, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Perry is trying to make Mexico the 51st or 52nd state. Puerto rico is supposed to be the 51st. NO NO NO. PUt the troops on the border and shoot all that enter illegally.

Posted by: You know it is true | October 2, 2011, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Great idea Rick…let’s attach Canada first for a little pre Mexican war practice. Rick Perry is pathetic and bankruped of ideas.

Posted by: fittinguy | October 2, 2011, 1:55 am 1:55 am

OK so get Obama’s, Bush’s , Clinton’s and all the family’s of the government to go back to the fields and pick the harvest ….Ask the young Republican party to enlist for This country War. Not just one Day thru sentence for the f$%* up Life we have to pay for But , a combat zone… Not a life long surplus of income… Have the government and there Blue blood family’s Start paying in blood for our rights they so love as they have done to all of us legal and illegal…………..
Get Mad but at the one that desire it The so called blue blood of America and the world. We all pay and pay and they all live life… with richest of our sweet blood and tears…

Posted by: DJS | October 2, 2011, 2:21 am 2:21 am

What we need is to bring the troops home, and place them on our border with Mexico, to fight the invaders we have bringing drugs and crime here. We do not need to safeguard Rick Perry’s friends in Mexico, because despite what he said, Juarez is not part of America or Texas.

He also told us he wanted to secede. I tell you what-why doesn’t he go down there and fight himself? Instead of risking our boys’ neck, he can fight for his constituents down there, and leave America like he said he wanted to do so.

America-Love it or Leave, freeloader! From the lone wolf state, eh?

Posted by: Beli Mawr | October 2, 2011, 2:31 am 2:31 am

Perry is an imbecile. We need to stop the two current wars, bring our troops home and legalize and tax drugs and end this stupid drug war. We can’t even stop drugs from entering a maximum security prison. Think about that.

Posted by: Enzo | October 2, 2011, 3:08 am 3:08 am

I live in Texas and get news reports from mexico constantly. Don’t send more resources and troops there, they are already getting drones. If Mexico doesn’t want to have a death penalty for crimes that scream for it, let them get what they want and have criminals live long in their countries. Don’t send troops there, we don’t need to babysit Mexico further.

Posted by: guest | October 2, 2011, 3:12 am 3:12 am

I want a war on drug CARTELS — not on DRUGS. Legalize drugs and attack the real problem.
Posted by: cm | October 1, 2011, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm——————————The only comment that makes sense.

Posted by: HI ATUS | October 2, 2011, 3:41 am 3:41 am

War with Mexico’s criminal elements? I think Americans are use to war overseas, it never touches them or affect their day to day. War with Mexico’s criminal elements would mean war at home. These brutal people would terrorize american citizens are do horrible mass murders. If they do it to their own, they would do it to us. But, in the end, I think our federal gov’t has to do more to protect us. The problem I foresee is how will the rules of war engagement be enacted here on our soil? Would the president target and kill an american without due process in Texas or Arizona like Obama did in Yemen? I think helping Mexico is good, but I’m not sure I want our military patrolling our neighborhoods to protect us from cartels.

Posted by: J. Young | October 2, 2011, 3:43 am 3:43 am

As much as I dont agree with most of the liberal comments on this article, few people are willing to face the absolute fact that drug addicted people in the US are creating the demand for drugs causing so much death and misery in Mexico and the border areas. Get to the root of this problem, if there is no demand, then this mess will eventually stop on its own. DRUG USERS, you are the problem and causing the death of thousands of people along with the oppression in the border communities. The cartels are simply meeting a demand in a very vicious way. Now, how do we deal with the drug addicted here? This is the real question.

Posted by: subiedude | October 2, 2011, 3:54 am 3:54 am

INVADE!

Posted by: BoboMcStevens | October 2, 2011, 4:27 am 4:27 am

Is anyone surprised by this? The GOP solutions almost always involve the military. I can see it now: If Perry gets elected troops are sent to Mexico. Of course, Perry will not raise taxes to pay for this so, in typical GOP fashion when it comes to the military, it will be a case of spend and owe. After it turns into a fiasco and Perry’s term in office is finished, a Democrat will be elected and have to deal with cleaning the mess up. Posted by: Thinks2010 | October 2, 2011, 1:03 am 1:03 am _________Excellent comment. Let me add: After Perry’s government failure where his minions lined their pockets and became rich just like in Bush tenure, a Democrat will be elected and once again the economic failure of the nation will imputed to him just like they did with Obama. Bottom line is: The patriotic Republicans yearning for power is because they use it as a tool to enrich themselves, subjugate the middle class and maintain their tight little club of their power strictly for themselves. It is about them. It has nothing to do with America. If the discontent of Wall Street spreads to the rest of the country, yes, they will use their arsenal they have been storing for the last three years and the excuse will be that “Muslim terrorists” are trying to take over the country. Oh yeah! These people have plan their alright.

Posted by: HI ATUS | October 2, 2011, 4:53 am 4:53 am

Governor Perry knows a lot more about the violence down there than most of us do. And it’s a lot worse thanks to the thousands of weapons that the ATF sold to the drug cartels via Obama/Holder’s Fast and Furious Operation. If the drug cartels threaten Americans, we have to stop the cartels.

Of course, ABC pounced on this particular comment to paint Perry as a war monger. Which he isn’t. But he does love America and will protect us if need be.

Posted by: joinamerica | October 2, 2011, 5:56 am 5:56 am

DRUG USERS, you are the problem and causing the death of thousands of people along with the oppression in the border communities. The cartels are simply meeting a demand in a very vicious way. Posted by: subiedude | October 2, 2011, 3:54 am.

Spoken like a true Republican. “Hey, it’s not the fault of the suppliers. It’s the USERS who are causing all the problems. These cartel guys are just businessmen, providing a product that is in demand.” It never occurs to people who think this way that if you cut off the supply, the demand will go down. And we need to distinguish between marihuana and the other illegal drugs. Pot isn’t a man-made, physically addictive drug like cocaine, heroin, or meth. Legalize marihuana in the USA and reduce crime immediately by a substantial percentage. THEN come up with a strategy to deal with the gangs and the harder drugs…………

Posted by: Searambler | October 2, 2011, 8:28 am 8:28 am

If we would have made Mexico a state back in 1840s we wouldn’t be having this problem now. Go in all the way to panama and annex them. Its a win win from them and us. Our border will be narrower and we won’t illegal problems. We’ll also have more resources and beaches!!!

Posted by: ordo | October 2, 2011, 8:45 am 8:45 am

See. This could have been easier to swallow if we avoided Iraq. We should tend to our own hemisphere (within reason). If we had concentrated on the drug and bandits over here our kids may live a little longer and we’d have half of the Arabs pissed off at us that already are. If we use our troops too much are we World’s Policemen or are we storm troopers for a NWO?

Posted by: Padhraig1313 | October 2, 2011, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Stupidity at it’s finest!

Posted by: blind spot | October 2, 2011, 8:59 am 8:59 am

So how would Mexico feel about the US placing troops on their soil? Albeit not to good! This guy is beyond scary. Whats really scary though is when you have someone who is mentally challenged and perhaps a better word would be unintellectual that has the worlds largest military at there disposal! See what Bush did?

Posted by: sybase46 | October 2, 2011, 9:38 am 9:38 am

I’d like to see drones on the boarder and start shooting when they see illegals with guns and/or dope on our soil. Also like to see this administration put on trial for selling guns to the Mexican cartel and criminals that have killed hundreds of people.

Posted by: Freedom | October 2, 2011, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Conservatives hate big government… except when it comes to starting wars and building prisons. But what about my taxes? What about my burden? Doesn’t anybody care about the taxes of the rich man? How about a blow job for the job creators?

Posted by: oldguy | October 2, 2011, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Shoot ‘em up Perry would be a joke if he wasn’t so frightening.

The Republican Party has run off their rails! No money to create jobs here in the US, but let’s spend on privatized prisons and “sending troops to Mexico”. You know, “small government”. Unbelievable.

Posted by: green.goddess | October 2, 2011, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Ron Paul’s policy of non-intervention is looking better all the time. Paul wants to close our military bases on foreign soil and and bring those troops home.
We need those troops on the border, not south of it. Keep Mexico’s problems in Mexico and our troops in the United States. We have enough problems to deal with here, Mexico’s problems are none of our business.

Posted by: oonogil | October 2, 2011, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Is he out of his mind are not in enough wars in other countries that we have no right being there and now he wants to put in another war that we created by buying the drugs the grow?

If we took care of our drugies in our own Country they would go broke because nobody would buy what they growing and the killings would end.

Posted by: Carol | October 2, 2011, 11:26 am 11:26 am

This is indeed a possible scenario, with the invitation of the Mexican government, to help them get the problem under control.

With Calderon due to leave office in 2012, we do need to be prepared for regime change, and we have no idea what that will bring to the problem.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | October 2, 2011, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Boots on the ground in Mexico? Huh? —– How about boots on the ground on our borders. Seems much more effective and would cost less and would not allow our money to go to some corrupt people., We just spent 23 billion in Pakinstan over the years. But we can’t spend anything here and we can’t use our troops more wisely…. It is just getting insane.

Posted by: overandover | October 2, 2011, 11:51 am 11:51 am

He probably wants to do that for the real reason of helping protect the new trade highway.

Posted by: overandover | October 2, 2011, 11:54 am 11:54 am

How about we use our troops to flush out the growers that are growing in our national parks and other remote land areas. It is a big problem.

Posted by: overandover | October 2, 2011, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Legalize marijuana and end the ludicrous, costly and uneffective prohibition and the sleezy WAR ON DRUGS. That will stop all the NONSENSE right away. Vote for RON PAUL.

Posted by: George | October 2, 2011, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

overandover, BIG problem? What a joke.. Yeah, it’s a WEED, real problem alright. Legalize it instead and vote for RON PAUL.

Posted by: George | October 2, 2011, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

I think what Perry means in regards to Climate Theory and that “there are still enough skeptics in my book” is that there are still enough rich CEOs on his list of campaign contributors. On the other hand, I think the only help Mexico has asked from the US is to do something about the demand for drugs.
It’s odd how these tea bag types profess to be experts in supply and demand only when it suits the needs of who really pays their tab. They simply want to get in power and disrupt the ability of government to do it’s job so that their paymasters will have more money to contribute.

Posted by: Ed | October 2, 2011, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

(R) 2012 RICK PERRY Presidential White House: If you (like New Hampshire) think you disagree with Gov. PERRY, you just have to learn how being citizens to live with a large rally of street mice population together. Because the Democrats coverup, American taxpayers are suffering to burden on a large prison bill to keep Obama’s fans in jails. There are quite differences between Texas’ and Alabama’ state Immigration law, since 1970s, different Republican Texan governors had discussed the same issue of the farm (seasonal) Hispanic workers, their families and children education, NO Texan governor(s) could ignore to offer at least something to settle the Hispanic affairs. Pretty soon, we’ll afraid Alabama’s farmers may run out of business to close their farms because the shortage of illegal Hispanic farm workers are running away to avoid arrested and deportation, our American grocery may go upper again …

Posted by: chankawah | October 2, 2011, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Federal troops or CSA (Confederate States of America)?
Couldn’t resiste – sorry

Posted by: Stewart | October 2, 2011, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Rick Perry is providing us with the comic relief that we all could use so let him keep yammering. I’ll just say no comment.

Posted by: howdymo1 | October 2, 2011, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Typical Republican position:Claim to want a smaller government, then massively expand the military’s roll in un-winnable wars. The Drug War is America’s TRUE “longest war”, over 40 years, still expanding and further from victory than ever before. The Republican solution? More of the same, much much more at much greater expense to the public.

Posted by: DanTheMan | October 2, 2011, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Put the troops on our border if you want to get serious about the drugs and illegals! How could he even entertain the thought of sending our military into Mexico! Loser!

Posted by: Kathy M. | October 2, 2011, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Would the president target and kill an american without due process in Texas or Arizona like Obama did in Yemen? Posted by: J. Young | October 2, 2011, 3:43 am 3:43 am_________________Bush killed hundred of thousands of Iraqis for no reason and Mr. J. Young brings this up. Bizarre!

Posted by: HI ATUS | October 2, 2011, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Tariffs not Troops. Tax the crap out of the drugs and make them so bloody expensive folks will be content with made in the USA beer. Same goes for solar panels, ipods, IT H1B job stealers……you want jobs and education in the USA for folks of the USA, let Perry step up and do his job rather than spout redneck talking point crap. Make it profitable and it will get done. We are the only country on earth that does not have enough sense in it’s government to derive funding from importers. China is going to own us without ever firing a shot.

Posted by: Bob | October 2, 2011, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

How about troops on our border? Perry is a professional politician and involved in fast furious. ha ha what a hypocrite !

Posted by: jay | October 2, 2011, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Perry has no chance because he’s dumber than George Bush, Ron Paul complained about killing a terrorist, Mitt Romney supports creating jobs overseas at the expense of American jobs, Newt never even gets mentioned in the media, Herman Cain’s only plan is 999 which will would require congress to stand on their heads to deal with it (ah oh, 666) Michelle Bachmann is dumber than Perry, wow, not much there yet. I know, let’s get the big guy from Jersey. Nope he supported the “ground zero” mosque. I guess only one god available is Rush Limbaugh. Damn, he’d have to give up his $400m contract with Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital subsidiary Clear Channel. : – )

Posted by: dan | October 2, 2011, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

overandover, BIG problem? What a joke.. Yeah, it’s a WEED, real problem alright. Legalize it instead and vote for RON PAUL.

—George- I am for making it legal and it should be treated just like booze. The BIG problem I was refering to was the crime it creates because of the way it is now.

Posted by: overandover | October 2, 2011, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

What makes you people out there think any candidate that is running, if elected could do what they say they can without the Congress working with them? They are promising you pie in the sky.

Posted by: overandover | October 2, 2011, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

I agree.

Posted by: Sandy | October 2, 2011, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

I heard somewhere that Rick Perry’s campaign is considering the slogan “Yee Haw!”

Posted by: green.goddess | October 2, 2011, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Wow another idiot. Yay for the lack of people worth voting for. I bet he doesnt care enough about any of this to realize that there isnt one comment in favor of this action. Surprise surprise. Why does it not occur to people that if all this stuff was legal the money would be crap and all these cartels would retire? I mean is that too complex of a solution to understand? Really?

Posted by: Randall | October 2, 2011, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

I couldn’t bring myself to vote for Obama. No way could I vote for someone as stupid as Rick Perry. If Perry gets the Republican nomination I’ll just stay home on election day. I’ve got some moonshine I haven’t opened yet. Maybe that will dull the pain.
We need to close our military bases in other countries and bring those troops home. We need to secure our border. Ron Paul wants to do just that. No one else is even talking about it.

Posted by: oonogil7 | October 2, 2011, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

What about CANADA, Rick? It’s about time we INVADE!

Posted by: San Chaz | October 2, 2011, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Right, because we’ve stopped all the drug cartels in Columbia….This dude is a joke. The corruption in our political system is becoming pretty blatant. It’s like these people don’t care enough and Americans have accepted it. I don’t even want to vote for ANYONE is this election, everyone is a joke.

Posted by: WTF | October 2, 2011, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

This idiot is more of the Status Quo. Business as usual, Wars – check, War on Drugs – check, Printing Press Money – check, nice hair – check, no brains – check.

No thanks Mr. Perry – It’s time we called in the DOCTOR.

Vote Ron Paul 2012.

Posted by: RonPaulVoter | October 3, 2011, 9:02 am 9:02 am

We need to put the drug cartels out of business the same way we put Al Capone out of business. End Prohibition! Only one candidate believes in the Free Market to cure this disease-Dr. Ron Paul.

Posted by: Paul Severe | October 3, 2011, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Do any of you out there know whom Perry ‘consulted’ on foreign adffairs? None other than Doug Feith one of the ‘stupidest neocons’ in President Bush’s administration. If this type of ‘stand or belief’ doesn’t disqualify Perry on the national scene…then we truly are a very ignorant out of touch nation.

Posted by: CND FOX | October 4, 2011, 7:58 am 7:58 am

Just when I think this idiot can’t make a bigger fool of himself – he opens his mouth again.

Posted by: carlc55 | November 7, 2011, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.