The Presidential Planner: Obama Signs Executive Order
This afternoon, in yet another executive action intended to boost the economy, President Obama signs an executive order that addresses prescription drug shortages.
The signing marks yet another move in the president’s “we can’t wait” campaign to grow the economy through unilateral actions while his $447 jobs bill remains stalled in Congress.
The president will direct the Food and Drug Administration to take steps to further reduce and prevent drug shortages, and price gouging. Obama will also reiterate his support for bipartisan legislation that will give the FDA new tools to avoid drug shortages.
Also today, the president meets with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair at the White House.

Email
White House Loves Aggressive Journalism ... Abroad
Virginia Ultrasound Bill Hits Nerve
The only obumbler should sign is his resignation….
Posted by: D. Schuster | October 31, 2011, 10:21 am 10:21 am
As the President continues his executive signing assault, I thought of what probably
happened during the Great Depression. So I used Google and found”Riots during
the Great Depression”. It was on a site Washington’s Blog. Very interesting footage
and commentary. And with all the crowds now in the major Cities protesting I
find this very similar.
Posted by: deadwrestler | October 31, 2011, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Tapper: “The signing marks yet another move in the president’s “we can’t wait” campaign to grow the economy through unilateral actions while his $447 jobs bill remains stalled in Congress.”
—-
Dictators take unilateral actions. See Chavez. To liberals who don’t think this is a big deal, keep in mind that Obama has set a precedent for future presidents. That includes Republicans.
Posted by: Libs are Hypocrites | October 31, 2011, 10:31 am 10:31 am
So what is he going to do magically make the ingredients for the drugs appear, tell Pharma what to make, and when to make it. Tell companies that they have to sell he first and everywhere else only if there is anything left over, or is he going to print or borrow more money creating more artificial demand driving drug prices up even higher. It is impossible fr everybody to get the same level of quality care, we can all get substandard care, but we all cannot get quality care, the best medicine, equipment, doctors and procedures.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | October 31, 2011, 10:33 am 10:33 am
“Obama will also reiterate his support for bipartisan legislation that will give the FDA new tools to avoid drug shortages. ” – ABC News
Ha ha ha ha!
The inept government will somehow come up with a tool to avoid drug shortages.
What kind of Tool?
A Hammer or a Monkey Wrench?
Maybe they’ll go overseas and buy a Spanner.
Better yet, let’s create another wasteful government agency and attempt to manufacture drugs.
Bwaaaa Ha Ha Ha.
Posted by: Noz | October 31, 2011, 10:34 am 10:34 am
This afternoon, in yet another executive action intended to boost the economy, President Obama signs an executive order that addresses prescription drug shortages.
LMAO “boost the economy” Mary bruce stop carrying water for this failure of a president, He’s put jobs on the back burner for almost 3 years to make his buddies richer, the culture of corruption grows
Posted by: Tell the truth MaRY | October 31, 2011, 10:47 am 10:47 am
“Obama will also reiterate his support for bipartisan legislation that will give the FDA new tools to avoid drug shortages. ” – ABC News
Ha ha ha ha!
The inept government will somehow come up with a tool to avoid drug shortages.
What kind of Tool?
A Hammer or a M o n k e y Wrench?
Maybe they’ll go overseas and buy a Spanner.
Better yet, let’s create another wasteful government agency and attempt to manufacture drugs.
Bwaaaa Ha Ha Ha.
Posted by: Noz | October 31, 2011, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Wait, this is the same guy who secretly met with Big Rx during the crafting of a really big bill about health, right?!
Posted by: ER | October 31, 2011, 10:52 am 10:52 am
This bill will work wonders on the economy the same way money for Solyndra did!
Posted by: 120V | October 31, 2011, 10:53 am 10:53 am
“Obama has set a precedent for future presidents”
-”precedent”?? How many executive orders and privileges did Bush claim again?
Posted by: cons are whiners | October 31, 2011, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Posted by: cons are whiners | October 31, 2011, 11:08 am 11:08 am
I thought Obama was all about “change.” He seems to be more like Bush on steroids.
Posted by: Don | October 31, 2011, 11:16 am 11:16 am
RE: Obama and Drug Companies
Devin Dwyer
Oct 28, 2011 11:32am
Obama Campaign Bundlers Have Ties to Lobbying Industry
“Pfizer executive Sally Susman, for example, chairs the company’s political action committee and leads its “public affairs activities, including relations with governments,” according the Pfizer website. She has bundled more than $500,000 in donations for Obama so far.”
Posted by: Lapfing | October 31, 2011, 11:17 am 11:17 am
If the government doesn’t break it, how are they supposed to swoop in and save it. Don’t let a good crises go to waste, even if it is a manufactured crisis.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | October 31, 2011, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Obama is like a person who just has a habit of spending. You know some sort of mind problem and facination with signing his name to checks to spend money and it has now become a total rush for him to just spend and spend with NO regard to how much money he has in his bank account. Only problem is he spends our money and listens to his economic advisers who bankrupt the companies they came from. GOD save us please
Posted by: Jim Rod | October 31, 2011, 11:32 am 11:32 am
“Obama will also reiterate his support for bipartisan legislation that will give the FDA new tools to avoid drug shortages. ”
Yeah, just what the economy needs, more tools for which the FDA can regulate and cripple American businesses with!!
It’s hiigh time we started cutting back these too powerful regulatory agencies like the FDA, EPA and etc. Too much government at too much cost.
Posted by: J.R. | October 31, 2011, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Well, thank goodness somebody cares about drug shortages.
Posted by: Secondlook | October 31, 2011, 11:47 am 11:47 am
“Well, thank goodness somebody cares about drug shortages.”
You wait until those factories are run by solar power!
Posted by: 120V | October 31, 2011, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Profound 120V. While you joke people are going without chemo drugs. It’s a national disgrace. On a lighter note, I’m sick of paying more for allergy meds due to a shortage as well.
Posted by: Secondlook | October 31, 2011, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Millions was spent by the government for H1N1 vaccine which arrived too late. Much of the vaccine was tossed because of the expiration date. In Michigan, one of the major (non-profit) hospitals will no longer accept (non-profit) Blue Cross Blue Shield insurance payments. The hospital says that BCBS payments need to offset Medicare/Medicaid under-payments. The government then asks why these insurances are not as efficient as Medicare/Medicaid! (More government smoke and mirrors)
Posted by: Common _ Sense | October 31, 2011, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
“It’s hiigh time we started cutting back these too powerful regulatory agencies like the FDA, EPA and etc. Too much government at too much cost”
Claiming cutting these agencies and the protective services they provide will save the public money is a scam. It will not.
Posted by: numbers | October 31, 2011, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Posted by: Secondlook—Like it or not healthcare is driven by the market. Everybody wants it, but cannot have it, there is not enough for everybody, even if people, governments or societies, could pay, the supply is finite, the components and chemicals to create it is finite, so either some government official, Insurance official, rations what you get or what you earn rations what you get. People can’t just have what they want, it doesn’t matter how many people want it. Everybody could want a million dollars also and the government could provide it, but it will not increase anyone’s purchasing power any.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | October 31, 2011, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
“The signing marks yet another move in the president’s “we can’t wait” campaign”
Yet, all these bills have been passed by the House, and Reid won’t let them come to the floor of the Democratic controlled Senate:
The Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act
H.R. 872 – Senate has taken no action to date
The Energy Tax Prevention Act
H.R. 910 – Senate has taken no action to date
Disapproval of FCC’s Net Neutrality Regulations
H.J.Res. 37 – Senate has taken no action to date
The Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act
H.R. 2018 – Senate has taken no action to date
Consumer Financial Protection & Soundness Improvement Act
H.R. 1315 – Senate has taken no action to date
Protecting Jobs From Government Interference Act
H.R. 2587 – Senate has taken no action to date
Transparency In Regulatory Analysis Of Impacts On The Nation
H.R. 2401 – Senate has taken no action to date
Cement Sector Regulatory Relief Act
H.R. 2681 – Senate has taken no action to date
EPA Regulatory Relief Act
H.R. 2250 – Senate has taken no action to date
Coal Residuals Reuse and Management Act
H.R. 2273 – Senate has taken no action to date
3% Withholding Rule Repeal
H.R. 674 – Senate has taken no action to date
Southeast Arizona Resource Utilization & Conservation Act
H.R. 1904 – Senate has taken no action to date
Veterans Opportunity to Work Act
H.R. 2433 – Senate has taken no action to date
Maximize Domestic Energy Production
The energy sector is crucial to our economic growth, and high energy costs have a major impact on job creation. We need policies that allow us to harness our abundant supply of natural resources in America, develop new sources of energy, and create jobs here at home.
Restarting American Offshore Leasing Now Act
H.R. 1230 – Senate has taken no action to date
Putting the Gulf of Mexico Back to Work Act
H.R. 1229 – Senate has taken no action to date
Reversing President Obama’s Offshore Moratorium Act
H.R. 1231 – Senate has taken no action to date
The Jobs and Energy Permitting Act of 2011
H.R. 2021 – Senate has taken no action to date
North American-Made Energy Security Act
H.R. 1938 – Senate has taken no action to date
Pay Down America’s Unsustainable Debt Burden
The federal government is spending and borrowing so much that the United States will soon go broke. Washington’s spending binge has put our nation in debt, eroded economic confidence, and caused massive uncertainty for private sector job creators. It’s time to live within our means.
Budget for Fiscal Year 2012
H.Con.Res. 34 – Senate has not yet considered a budget of its own
The Democrat controlled SENATE is holding up jobs creation.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 31, 2011, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
President Goldman Sachs acts unilaterally to cut a deal for Big Pharma? Again?
Posted by: foggy | October 31, 2011, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Hope this works out better than the failed stimulus. To prove it was a failure this guy now wants another half trillion for more band aids.What we need is somebody that knows what they are doing.
Posted by: specialty57 | October 31, 2011, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
WheresMyMoney Your point is well taken!!!!!!
Harry Reid is the man holding up every Bill in Washington.
Glad you named them all for the Democrats to see.
Inaction is with the Senate as they only want the Obama
Spread the wealth to Cash Bundlers and Unions plans
to move forward.
Posted by: deadwrestler | October 31, 2011, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Posted by: wheresmymoney—The uncompetitive nature of the US workforce, business environment, and regulatory environment is what is holding up job creation. The jobs that made the middle class 20, 30, or more years ago are gone, and they are not coming back, we could add tariffs to imports, and people just wouldn’t be able to afford what is in the stores, and companies would not move back immediately, because in the end it is cheaper to produce in other countries than here, and like it or not the US is only 1/20th the global consumer base.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | October 31, 2011, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
“and Reid won’t let them come to the floor of the Democratic controlled Senate”
Thank goodness for that. Reid and the rest of the Democrats know that more of the formulaic Republican deregulatory giveaways will not create jobs when the real problem is lack of consumer demand and spending.
Posted by: numbers | October 31, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
The uncompetitive nature of the US workforce, business environment, and regulatory environment is what is holding up job creation.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | October 31, 2011, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Then why is Obama placing the blame on the Republicans?
Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 31, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
How many million jobs did Obama say his $400B bill would create? Well, then how many jobs would be created if $1.5T in private offshore funds is repatriated funds? So, if Obama cared about jobs, he’d be humping it to get those funds back to the USA. Is he?
Posted by: deanbob | October 31, 2011, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
More bull, why is he bragging about going around Congress? Sounds like a dictator. Mr. President, please shut up and have your Democratic controlled Senate pass a budget and vote on the 15 bills awaiting them. Don’t think I can handle 12 more months of his constant campaigning and complaining.
Posted by: Freedom | October 31, 2011, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Reid and the rest of the Democrats know that more of the formulaic Republican deregulatory giveaways will not create jobs when the real problem is lack of consumer demand and spending.
Posted by: numbers | October 31, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Really? Then why is Obama running around the country on our dime blaming the Republicans? UNION giveaways are not the solution!
Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 31, 2011, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
“It’s time to live within our means”
Note again how all Republican ‘solutions’ involve cutting benefits and protections for working class Americans while asking nothing further from their favored constituents in the top 1% who hold nearly half of the nation’s wealth while paying the lowest tax rates in 50 years, and are just sitting on trillions of dollars which they aren’t investing in jobs.
Posted by: numbers | October 31, 2011, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
snewsom2997 ……….. Like it or not there is no reason our government can’t say to drug makers “look, better communication or whatever” can help with these shortages and you’re going to have to let us know when there is a problem on lifesaving drugs. This rather concerns me since I appear to be heading to Glaucoma and could go blind if drops are disrupted. The fact we mfg. so many our drugs elsewhere isn’t a great thing for national security either. You have a seriously different view of life than most people I know and I think I’m figuring out it’s mostly just unique and not evil or something. But you come across so negative at times. Like “see a problem? Tough. Doesn’t matter. That’s life.” Sorry, I see a problem and think we can fix it.
Posted by: Secondlook | October 31, 2011, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
The RECESSION is what has murdered job growth. Maybe “the business environment” due to a serious lack of demand. Housing is a giant driving force in the US economy and it’s in the tank. Republicans are completely making up that regulations are the cause.
Posted by: Secondlook | October 31, 2011, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Posted by: wheresmymoney—No one wants to fix the problem. Because the problem is a nasty generational problem, that won’t be fixed in an election cycle or a decade, it will take an entire generation. The problem is we teach kids what to learn instead of how to learn, we reward going along with the crowd and punish individualism, schools are not government funded daycare, parents still have to make their kids do the work at home, they have to make them study, they have to make the read, the government has no control over what happens in the home, if the parents fail the kids at home, the kids will fail for the rest of their lives. We have indoctrinated nearly two generations in group think. When kids are challenged by something, they get to quit, or pass anyway, regardless of whether they know the material. That is the 1st part of the problem, the 2nd part of the problem is that there will be a very high percentage of people now and in the future that just won’t make it, Unlike 50 years ago we don’t need 10,000′s ditch diggers we need a few back hoe operators, we don’t need an army of carpenters, because most homes are mass produced in pieces and then assembled, We don’t need tens of thousands working for road crews, because we have machinery, that in theory is supposed to increase productivity. We have technologically improved the nation to the point that 300+ million people are just not needed to keep the country running, look at the numbers, only about a 1/3 of the population are keeping the entire country running, and a good percentage of that 1/3 are doing busy work for the government, or are underemployed.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | October 31, 2011, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
“Profound 120V. While you joke people are going without chemo drugs. It’s a national disgrace. On a lighter note, I’m sick of paying more for allergy meds due to a shortage as well.”
Too bad you don’t have friends in low places and a regional office at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. People like me do. And we get what we want and your money. We’ll spend it well, trust me. Soon we will all have solar panels and poor Mr. Sachs won’t have to live on the street either…
Posted by: 120V | October 31, 2011, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
NUMBERS | OCTOBER 31, 2011, 12:09 PM 12:09 PM…..”Claiming cutting these agencies and the protective services they provide will save the public money is a scam. It will not.”……..and Obama said he would not raise taxes one penny for anyone making less than $250K; but less than 1 month in office, he raised the tax on tobacco over 2000%!
Posted by: deanbob | October 31, 2011, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
“Then why is Obama running around the country on our dime blaming the Republicans?”
Because they deserve every bit of it. The Republicans are doing nothing about job creation besides token peddling of their corporate giveaways because they want unemployment to stay high till the election.
Posted by: numbers | October 31, 2011, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
The Roman Empire lasted 1,000 years, but only about half that time as a republic. The Roman Republic fell for many reasons, but three reasons are worth remembering: declining moral values and political civility at home, an overconfident and overextended military in foreign lands, and fiscal irresponsibility by the central government. Sound familiar? In my view, it’s time to learn from history and take steps to ensure the American Republic is the first to stand the test of time. — Honorable David M. Walker. Comptroller General of the United States, head of the Government Accountability Office, 2008
Posted by: Joe | October 31, 2011, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
The middle class is shrinking by devouring itself. I don’t blame the corporations and big business for this. They do what they get paid to do and protect their bottom line and they’re smart about it. They sell their agenda to the American people like they sell soap and potato chips.
I do blame those Americans who have bought into to the corporate propaganda that discredit the labor unions. The corporations have neutralized labors power for a basic reason; so they can out-source to a cheap labor market with no consequences.
The labor unions gave America the highest standard of living in the world and built the middle class. Many of these union bashers enjoy the benefits those guys on the picket lines earned for them. The middle class will continue to shrink until these misinformed people get some common sense and see the real motive behind all the anti-union propaganda.
Posted by: tmferretti | October 31, 2011, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
TMFERRETTI | OCTOBER 31, 2011, 12:51 PM 12:51 PM……”The labor unions gave America the highest standard of living in the world and built the middle class. Many of these union bashers enjoy the benefits those guys on the picket lines earned for them. “….And what of Hong Kong’s huge middle class – with no unions (to speak of)????
Posted by: deanbob | October 31, 2011, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Posted by: tmferretti—The labor Unions gave us uncompetitive standard of livings. The Chinese and Indians were not in the game when the labor unions drove up standard of living, we were a US economy and not a global one, the majority of our GDP was from Exports not services and government. Today there are 4+ billion people that you now have to compete against that were not playing 30-40-50 years ago. The more people that try out for the team, does not increase the number of people that make the team. The success of the 40′-50′s-60′s etc, was based on the fact that the team was just the US, and our good standard of living came at the expense of billions living hand to mouth in dirt in places like, China, India, Africa, and the Warsaw Pact.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | October 31, 2011, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
China is communist and is seriously running into their own problems as that middle class grows. You also have no clue what their working conditions are and I’d speculate not nearly as decent as ours. You guys need to wake up that as you continue to buy this stupidity that this 10% of our workforce is so evil by the time you gut this you’re going to be taking a hit. Big time. They brought you the 40 hour week, safer work conditions, paid sick, etc. Thank them the next time you vacation.
Posted by: Secondlook | October 31, 2011, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Republicans are completely making up that regulations are the cause.
Posted by: Secondlook | October 31, 2011, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
And Obama is completely making up the assertation that Republicans are the cause.
He has COMPOUNDED the problem with his uinion and energy fundraising donor giveaways.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 31, 2011, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
DEANBOB AND SNEWSOM2997
Communist China doesn’t need labor unions. The government controls and dictates wages. There middle class has a much lower standard of living than does ours. If you want to use China and India as a measurement of the middle class compared to ours, go ahead, you just made my point.
Posted by: tmferretti | October 31, 2011, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
the real problem is lack of consumer demand and spending.
Posted by: numbers | October 31, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
“Then why is Obama running around the country on our dime blaming the Republicans?”
Because they deserve every bit of it. The Republicans are doing nothing about job creation Posted by: numbers | October 31, 2011, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
You can’t have it both ways numbers. There either is a need for jobs, or there isn’t. AND the government doesn’t CREATE jobs. But the Republican’s bills (posted by yours truly at 12:10) are trying to create a friendly environment for job creation in the private sector. Reid (Obama’s water carrier) won’t allow them to come to the floor. If some passed, Obama wouldn’t be able to whine about a do nothing Congress.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 31, 2011, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
“The more people that try out for the team, does not increase the number of people that make the team”
I do not think you should assume that the size of global labor force is a zero sum game.
Posted by: numbers | October 31, 2011, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
“Communist China doesn’t need labor unions.”
It’s fun to watch a pro-labor-union pro-Chicom mind protect itself from itself.
Posted by: foggy | October 31, 2011, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
“But the Republican’s bills (posted by yours truly at 12:10) are trying to create a friendly environment for job creation”
Show where the CBO or any reputable private firm estimates that those bills you listed will create many jobs. They rely on multiplier gimmicks to boost their estimates…which aren’t very high to begin with, and don’t take into account the further costs the public will ultimately bear because of less regulation. They are nothing more than token giveaways.
Posted by: numbers | October 31, 2011, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
They brought you the 40 hour week, safer work conditions, paid sick, etc. Thank them the next time you vacation.
Posted by: Secondlook | October 31, 2011, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
They also got us here:
State Budget Solutions reports:
The state governments have been increasing the fringe benefits of their employees. As Bob Williams explains, this is because the government cannot afford the cost of employee union demands-often regarding retirement and health care benefits. State Budget Solutions found that heavily unionized government worker states, like California and New York, have the largest unfunded pensions and retiree health care.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics Databases, there is an increase in state and local government fringe benefits. Public employees are receiving pension and retirement benefits that are 337 percent greater than private sector employees. The cost of employee compensation, specifically retirement and savings, averages $0.97 per hour in the private sector. This is compared to the $3.27 per hour that public sector employees accrue.
New York and Massachusetts both illustrate the differences in retirement benefits between the public and private sectors. In New York, the Census Bureau recorded that the average private sector retiree was receiving an annual pension of $13,100 in 2009. State and local employees earned over twice as much in annual benefits, resulting in $27,600. For public sector retirees, this number is free of state and local taxes–a luxury that private employees don’t have.
Massachusetts is running into the issue of potentially losing some of its municipal services because pension and health care benefits are increasing rapidly. The number of state employees with receiving $100,000 or more in pensions has increased to 20 percent in one year. Massachusetts’s state pension fund has a current unfunded $4.9 billion guaranteed to current retirees. ”
Public sector employees are being paid better retirements than we are receiveing…..BY US.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 31, 2011, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
No where in the Constitution is the Executive office afforded the power to appoint Czars and/or sign Executive Orders. The only purpose for these two things is to circumvent Congress and give more power to the Executive Branch than was ever intended. Both should be deemed unconstitutional and therefore illegal. We are slowly seeing the usurpation of the states rights to govern and the breakdown of our checks and balances on the three branches of government in Washington. People need to remember that it is with the states that most of our laws are supposed to reside not in Washington DC.
Posted by: MnNice | October 31, 2011, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
The President is suppose to work with Congress, not around Congress like a dictator. Maybe if he would go back to work (instead of campaigning and fund raising) he would see there are 15 bills awaiting in the Senate to be voted on. Funny how he forgets to add that the Democratic Senate is holding up all these bills and his jobs bill, seems it’s only those bad old Republicans.
Posted by: Obama Sucks | October 31, 2011, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
He’s put jobs on the back burner for almost 3 years
Posted by: Tell the truth MaRY | October 31, 2011, 10:47 am 10:47 am
That’s not true.
The very first thing the Obama administration passed was the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). It was signed into law February 17, 2009.
Almost every professional source reports this Act saved or created millions of jobs:
CBO: Between 1.3 million and 3.6 million jobs saved or created.
IHS/Global Insight: 2.45 million jobs saved or created.
Macroeconomic Advisers: 2.3 million jobs saved or created.
Moody’s Economy.com: 2.5 million jobs saved or created.
Posted by: Jake | October 31, 2011, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Whereismymoney – No, what brought us here was states agreeing to salaries and then not funding the pension plans like they were supposed to because it was too easy to use that money for something else. THEN we had a recession that wiped out a wad. And they began to blame the employees vs. what really did it. Retirement accounts are not evil and it was vested salary. Their incomes were not excessive either. But then again I’m writing this to some anti my fellow man republican that bought the mantra that the entire ills of this country are all because of some citizens so you won’t blame the stinking politicians that did it.
Posted by: Secondlook | October 31, 2011, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
No where in the Constitution is the Executive office afforded the power to appoint Czars and/or sign Executive Orders.
Posted by: MnNice | October 31, 2011, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Don’t kid yourself. If there were anything even vaguely unconstitutional about these, the belligerent Republicans in the House would be on this like a dog with a rag in its mouth. There is nothing.
Posted by: Jude | October 31, 2011, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
On FOIA, Obama wants a license to lie
By: Examiner Editorial | 10/30/11 8:05 PM
It’s not often that the liberal American Civil Liberties Union and conservative Judicial Watch agree on anything, but the Obama administration’s lack of transparency has brought the two together. Obama’s Justice Department has proposed a regulatory change that would weaken the Freedom of Information Act. Under the new rules, the government could falsely respond to those who file FOIA requests that a document does not exist if it pertains to an ongoing criminal investigation, concerns a terrorist organization, or a counterintelligence operation involving a foreign nation.
Posted by: ButterBeans&ObamaLIES | October 31, 2011, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Retirement accounts are not evil and it was vested salary.
Posted by: Secondlook | October 31, 2011, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Of course they are not evil. But they need to be paid BY the people that are using them. They also need to be tied to Social Security age eligibility. The average California public sector retirement age is 53 years old. A LIFEGUARD at age 51, retired with $108,000 a year salary plus medical benefits for the rest of his life. Lifeguards receive 90% of their HIGHEST paid salary at age 50. They pay
3-5% of their salary into the system. And WE are paying for it. People that can’t retire until 67, when full social security kicks in, are paying $100,000 a year for a 50 year old to travel.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | October 31, 2011, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Republicans have absolutely NO interest in creating jobs or making life better in any way for the average American. They will hold their stand and keep on doing NOTHING, unless you call 4 different bills regarding ABORTION doing anything – but they will do NOTHING about JOBS, JOBS, JOBS, as they LIED about that to get elected in 2010 (as if MOST of us didn’t know they’d be lying). Then they will wait until the next election in HOPES that the people of this NATION are so dimwitted as their OWN base the Republican voter and will actually be DUMB enough to chose a Republican. FAT CHANCE. Most people do NOT want the Republicans to complete their total DESTRUCTION of the USA by greed and religion. President OBAMA in 2012!!!!
Posted by: demNme5 | October 31, 2011, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
No where in the Constitution is the Executive office afforded the power to appoint Czars and/or sign Executive Orders. – - – ROFL. Really? Do you really think that if there was even the most miniscule part of a grain of truth to your statement that NOBODY would have thought to challenge them in more than 200 years? Washington signed the first Executive Order on June 8, 1789. Lincoln began numbering them with #1 on Oct 20, 1862. Learn to friggin read and understand language IN CONTEXT. Just because a specific word or phrase is not in the Constitution (i.e. czar or executive order) that does not necessarily mean it is not possible to find an equivalent explicit or implicit meaning. Article II Section 1: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States.” The President is head of the Executive Branch. As the head of the Executive the President can direct, i.e. give orders to, other members of the Executive Branch. Article II Section 2 Clause 2: (paraphrase of relevant parts) The President shall have the Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to appoint “other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law;…” How is a “czar” of anything not a “Public Minister” or “Consul” or other “Officer of the United States”? Please, learn to engage in independent RATIONAL thought.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | October 31, 2011, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
The latest DoE loan recipient to declare bankruptcy is Beacon Power Corp:
Here we go again with Obama dumping taxpayer money…What a SCAM he is running
media goes silent
Posted by: ButterBeans&ObamaLIES | October 31, 2011, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
So now Obama is ruling by Executive Fiat! – Obama is right We Can’t Wait for 2012 and a new president!
Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 31, 2011, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
wheresmymoney…. They did pay it. It was removed from a pay check and then not put into an account by those in charge. And as far as age? Well, they only have so much money and it’s theirs regardless. So it really doesn’t matter what age they begin to collect. If they die it’s part of the estate. These same people don’t get SS I might add. Though that would matter on insurance now that I think about it. And for what it’s worth? I have no problem moving said age either.
Posted by: Secondlook | October 31, 2011, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
The latest DoE loan recipient to declare bankruptcy is Beacon Power Corp:
media goes silent
Posted by: ButterBeans&ObamaLIES | October 31, 2011, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
That isn’t true. It’s all over the media. Perhaps you should pay more attention.
Posted by: James | October 31, 2011, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Obama has never been a leader before so it’s understandable that he doesn’t know what he’s doing. He has a hard time making decisions and even when he does he’s unsure of himself. Valerie tells him what to do anyway.
Posted by: Lefty | October 31, 2011, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Posted by: Jake | October 31, 2011, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Please stop lifting my talking points from other threads!
Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2011, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
The drug companies will probley make even fewer drugs now, because Obama has no Constitutional authority to order a private company to make anything! – Few presidents have trampled the Constitution like Obama has!
Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 31, 2011, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Posted by: Jake | October 31, 2011, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Please stop lifting my talking points from other threads!
Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2011, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
They’re excellent facts Jim. Glad to use them to straighten out the liars. Thanks.
Posted by: Jake | October 31, 2011, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Few presidents have trampled the Constitution like Obama has!
Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 31, 2011, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
yawn . . . it the President had done ANYTHING even vaguely against the Constitution, you can bet the belligerent Republican House would have been on it like a dog shaking a rag. There is nothing. You seem a little hysterical and beyond reason.
Posted by: Judd | October 31, 2011, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Posted by: Jake | October 31, 2011, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Wrong. Plagiarizing is not cool. It shows a lack of character and integrity. I don’t care that you’re on my side. Use your own talking points.
Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2011, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
“yawn . . . it the President had done ANYTHING even vaguely against the Constitution, you can bet the belligerent Republican House would have been on it like a dog shaking a rag. There is nothing. You seem a little hysterical and beyond reason.”
Posted by: Judd | October 31, 2011, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Jude already posted this earlier:
“If there were anything even vaguely unconstitutional about these, the belligerent Republicans in the House would be on this like a dog with a rag in its mouth. There is nothing.”
Now you’re stealing her exact phrases as well? Don’t you have any original thoughts? Shameful.
Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2011, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2011, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
“yawn . . . it the President had done ANYTHING even vaguely against the Constitution, you can bet the belligerent Republican House would have been on it like a dog shaking a rag. There is nothing. You seem a little hysterical and beyond reason.”
Posted by: Ben | October 31, 2011, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Posted by: numbers—-We grow the economy by bringing new resources to market, everything else is just cannibalization or reallocation of resources. Take Computers for instance, Computers didn’t grow the economy, people adapted, computers cost the people who did anything with typewriters to go out of business, as new software was written, thousands of accountants, and statisticians, lost their jobs, people adapted and did new things, some people thought up new ideas, but the new ideas are taking fewer and fewer people, every improvement reduces the number of workers, productivity is and has been growing faster than our ability to make new jobs. Yes we can grow the economy with ideas, but not on a massive scale like you can with manufacturing or exporting of raw materials and resources. Our government policies, stop new resources from being brought to market, or it increases the cost beyond what is competitive on a global scale. We are a global economy, there is no going back, and reduction in the amount of customers that Americans have access to, will not improve the bottoms 50% lot in life, adding tariffs will not improve the bottom 50% lot in life. Raising the cost of imports will only reduce consumption, making stuff here will only raise prices and thus reduce consumption. In either case we consume less, and 70% of the economy is consuming, that is what employs the majority of the people, providing goods and services, that is what the majority of Americans do, and they will be the ones that loose their jobs. The economic growth of the past 30 years, the growth not related to government spending, has increased solely because of productivity increases, mainly through technology, the people that do that stuff have jobs, and will have jobs, making stuff has always been a safer economic bet, than just selling stuff. That is why the 50-60-70 were more or less halcyon times for the US, most people made stuff, as a result most people did OK economically, their standard of living improved and their kids did as well. The difference today is that the Chinese are out competing everyone in the manufacturing field, so people adapt and do what isn’t in the manufacturing field, so that leaves us producing ideas and knowledge, the number of people required or even able to do that is far less than the armies of factory workers that made it in the past.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | October 31, 2011, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Posted by: Secondlook—-Yes they are Communists and that does give them certain efficiencies, at the expense of freedom of course. They don’t waste money on research of hundreds of consumer goods, like Cell Phones, MP3 Players, Computers, TV’s, they don’t design the clothes, they don’t invent anything, they let others do that, and they cherry pick the successes, and produce them for a cost that no one can compete with. They use espionage and restrictive business practices to get and maintain control of the intellectual property they want. IF you want to make something in China it requires a majority Chines shareholder, if a competitor agrees and can get his good to market cheaper than you, your competitor wins. The Chinese are not and have not been an innovative society in a very long time, they are consumers of knowledge not creators of knowledge. As long as the is a surplus of global labor it is a race to the bottom, it will be won by those that either can make do on the barest of minimums, or those that are in fields that do not have a surplus.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | October 31, 2011, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
A basic freedom is a human beings right to fight for a fair and appropriate wage, safe working place, and a share of the profits their labor generates. Take away the middle class’s right to collective bargaining and you’ve taken away one of the most important rights we have. As I said, the republican attack on the middle class starts with taking away the middle class’s power by discrediting the unions. They see nothing wrong in making sure the truffle eaters are taken care of but insist that only the middle class make the sacrifices..
Posted by: tmferretti | October 31, 2011, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Obama would rather rule by Executive Fiat than urge the Senate to pass any of the 15 Jobs Bills passed by the House this year! – Why are the Democrats and Obama BLOCKING Republican efforts to create jobs!!! – Well Obama did say he will Veto any Republican Jobs Bill passed by Congress! Oh those obstructionist Democrats, they want to hike the Tax rates for top earners back up to 90% before they will agree to pass any Jobs Bills for unemployed Americans!
Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 31, 2011, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Posted by: Jake | October 31, 2011, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Please stop lifting my talking points from other threads!
Posted by: Jim | October 31, 2011, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
They’re excellent facts Jim. Glad to use them to straighten out the liars. Thanks.
Posted by: Jake | October 31, 2011, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
———————————————————————————
Talking to yourself again?
Posted by: reposter...by thyself | October 31, 2011, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Radioman77: Why are the Democrats and Obama BLOCKING Republican efforts to create jobs!!! ============== Yes, those bills you speak of consist of the SAME crap that the Republicans have been trying to ram down our throats for some time now. NEVER raise Taxes on the Rich and do away with Regulations. I guess the Cons have ABSOLUTELY NO memory of how their lack of regulations usually take over ANY sensibilities from them and revert them back to people who MISUSE the laws and leave the orginary citizen open to LOTS of harm from the GREEDY, Those who WILL do ANYTHING to make MORE money even at the cost of our environment and people’s lives and livelihood! No thanks Cons, I’ll take “Protective” regulations over what you SPEW any day!!!
Posted by: demNme5 | October 31, 2011, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
“ABSOLUTELY NO memory of how their lack of regulations usually take over ANY sensibilities”
Posted by: demNme5 | October 31, 2011, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Yes I do remember when Barney Frank and other liberal Democrats did their best to resend regulations to make it easier for people to get “Liar’s Loans” that led to the mortgage melt down that resulted in our current economic problems! And please don’t deny that happened, because Frank has already admitted it was a ” mistake” during a video interview!
Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 31, 2011, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Congress cant vote on Obama’s job bill because HENRY ReiD wont bring it up for a vote. Why? Because it is so bad not even democrats can support it.
Posted by: retired military | November 1, 2011, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm