Can the ‘New Newt’ Shed Past Baggage?

Richard Shiro/AP Photo
Newt Gingrich is giving his opponents a run for their money, but some are questioning whether social conservatives — a group Gingrich desperately needs to win the candidacy — can overlook his oft-controversial political and personal baggage.
Gingrich’s Washington insider label may not be that easy to shake off. The former House speaker has spent more than 20 years in Congress, and the last decade building up small business enterprises with close ties to politicians. His personal life has taken just as much heat as his political record.
Here’s a look at some of Gingrich’s past that continues to haunt him.
Ties to Freddie Mac
Gingrich made more than $1.6 million consulting for federally-backed mortgage giant Freddie Mac for eight years. That work would not have been scrutinized, except that Gingrich still hasn’t answered all the questions that have emerged about his affiliation with a group loathed by the right.
Most conservatives, including Tea Partiers, want Freddie Mac to be eliminated altogether.
Even Gingrich has turned on the group he once consulted for and advocated disbanding the group. He has blamed Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae for distorting the home loan market and demanded in 2008 that President Obama and other members of Congress return the money they received from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. More recently, he said Democrats like Rep. Barney Frank should be jailed for having ties with lobbyists at those organizations.
As for his own ties, Gingrich said he advised the organization to restructure their business and “suggest a totally different model” but sources inside Freddie Mac told Bloomberg that Gingrich neither predicted the housing bubble nor did he raise concerns about the business model.
Marriages
As he has done so in his past campaigns, Gingrich has made family values a core focus of his presidential run. But he cannot escape what he has admitted are shortfalls in his own family life.
Gingrich, who was dogged by allegations of extramarital affairs early in his career, has had two failed marriages.
He married his second wife, Marianne, the same year his divorce with his first wife was finalized. He then took up with his current spouse, Callista Bisek, while he was still married to wife No. 2. Even as he was reportedly having an affair with Bisek, a Congressional aide 23 years his junior, Gingrich was blasting Bill Clinton on his family values and his relationship with Monica Lewinsky.
He later blamed his busy political life for his inappropriate actions, telling the Christian Broadcasting Network that such things were “partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country, that I worked far too hard.”
In recent years, Gingrich and Callista racked up to half a million dollars’ worth of debt at Tiffany’s. Gingrich’s financial disclosures revealed that his wife held a revolving charge account at Tiffany and Co. in 2005 and 2006, when she worked at the House Agriculture Committee. Their liabilities at the jewelry store ranged from $250,001 to $500,000 over time.
The two were also lambasted over the summer for going on a cruise in the Greek Isles at a time when some of his staff thought they should have been focusing on the campaign. That trip, in part, led to the mass resignation of many of the campaign’s senior leadership, who said Gingrich was not focused on the election.
Religion
Gingrich’s religious affiliation may not bring the same kind of media attention as Mitt Romney’s Mormonism, but it’s still a point of discussion in conservative circles.
Influenced partly by his wife, Gingrich converted to Catholicism in March 2009. The move was welcomed by many in the Catholic community, but others asked whether it was merely a political ploy by a man who had had an extramarital affair and two failed marriages.
Though the United States has had only one Catholic president — John F. Kennedy — the Catholic connection could help Gingrich in the general election. Catholic voters, who had favored Democratic over Republican candidates by double-digit margins in the last two congressional elections, swung to the GOP in 2010, according to an analysis by the Pew Research Center.
It wasn’t the first time Gingrich switched denominations. He was born into a Lutheran family, but became Southern Baptist when he was in graduate school.
Immigration
Gingrich has presented the most moderate stance on immigration among Republican contenders, which could both help or hurt him in the primaries.
The former House speaker said he advocates a “humane” immigration policy, which includes a path to legalization for people who have long-established family roots in America. His opponents have slammed his ideas as providing amnesty to illegal residents.
Some say the idea is unlikely to sit well with conservative voters, who want to tighten immigration laws and support such measures at the state level.
But others say the move could help Gingrich pick up Latino voters, a demographic that George W. Bush successfully courted. That group, however, will be more influential in the general election than in the primaries and caucuses.
Global Warming
In 1989, Gingrich co-sponsored the Global Warming Prevention Act and in 2008 appeared with then-House speaker Nancy Pelosi to warn about global warming. Now he says he doesn’t know whether climate change is really occurring and called that ad “the dumbest single thing” he’s done in recent years.
Gingrich may be walking back from his comments but it remains to be seen whether conservatives can overlook his past stance.
He also once advocated imposed mandatory limits on carbon dioxide emissions, but has recently become a vocal critic of the cap-and-trade bills.
“I do know that I’m opposed to cap-and-trade and I’m opposed to any kind of massive government response,” he said recently.
Health Care
Even though he assailed the health care bill, Gingrich once advocated an individual mandate for insurance coverage. He has been accused of having close ties to insurance giants through his businesses.
He has blasted the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act, saying in a video that he is “completely opposed to the Obamacare mandate on individuals,” and that he “fought it for two and half years at the Center for Health Transformation.” But the Center for Health Transformation, which Gingrich founded, actually supported imposing a mandate on those who made more than $50,000 per year. Gingrich himself has said that individuals have a responsibility to have health insurance.
The group says it advocates such a move at the state level, not solutions that are “forced at the federal level,” but that hasn’t been clear through Gingrich’s past statements. In fact, he criticized opponent Mitt Romney for implementing such a “bureaucratic” mandate in Massachusetts.
Gingrich also broke from the right when he praised his client Gundersen Lutheran Health System’s end-of-life best practice as one that “empowers patients and families.” At the height of the health care debate, in which end-of-life care became a key dividing issue between Republicans and Democrats, Gingrich stood alone in the Republican field.
Abortion
Some Republicans are concerned about Gingrich’s changing views on abortion and whether he’s sincerely conservative on this issue.
Gingrich has said he supports abortion in the case of rape, incest and if the mother’s life is in danger. Although he now opposes federal funding for embryonic stem cell research and abortion, he didn’t always think that way.
In 1995, Gingrich supported a measure to provide federal funding for abortion to poor women who were victims of rape or incest. In 2001, Gingrich said stem cell research on embryonic cells that are “pre-fetal” isn’t objectionable.
Child Labor
In the latest flap to engulf the former congressman, Gingrich is taking heat for calling U.S. child labor laws “truly stupid.”
Speaking at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, Gingrich blasted unions and suggested that in poor areas, children should replace janitors.
“It is tragic what we do in the poorest neighborhoods, entrapping children in, first of all, in child laws, which are truly stupid,” Gingrich said. “Most of these schools ought to get rid of the unionized janitors, have one master janitor and pay local students to take care of the school. The kids would actually do work. They would have cash, they’d have pride in the schools, they’d begin the process of rising.”
Gingrich later explained that he wasn’t advocating looser child labor laws or saying that children should drop out of school and become janitors, but suggesting ways in which young teens could become “empowered to succeed.” Still, his comments have sparked national furor.
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees launched an online petition denouncing Gingrich’s ideas as “vicious and wrong.”
Liberals have blasted Gingrich’s remarks as “truly stupid.”
His comments, however, have brought virtually no response from conservatives.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
I would love to see Gingrich win the GOP nomination.
Posted by: Myak23 | November 30, 2011, 6:11 am 6:11 am
Why not? Obama shed his……that which was known that is.
Posted by: newcountryman | November 30, 2011, 6:22 am 6:22 am
Which Newt is talking today? Everyday brings a retraction or clarification of a past remark. There is NO other political candidate with more baggage than Newt. If his past escapes review by republican voters in the primary then the GOP deserves to lose in 2012. Do the right thing and vote for Huntsman…….AND NO I AM NOT POSTING TOO FAST ABC, FIX YOUR SITE!
Posted by: Indymind | November 30, 2011, 7:18 am 7:18 am
He needs to ship his baggage to an under developed country because here in the US we know who he is and what he has done.
Posted by: Lupigon | November 30, 2011, 7:23 am 7:23 am
Well it is his baggage vs obama’s baggage. Obama has a train full of losing baggage at this point. And it is fresh in all of the unemployed minds! It is the GOPs election to lose. Obama with his absoluteley dismal record can’t “win”. His approval rate is below Carters now!
Posted by: jonny | November 30, 2011, 7:27 am 7:27 am
Let’s see. 3 marriages, a couple of affairs (one which took place while working on impeaching Clinton for lying about an affair), was charged with 84 ethics violations, lying to the ethics panel, intentional and reckless disregard of House rules, violation of tax law. He finally resigned his speakership. Yeah, I’m sure he’s now a changed man and is perfectly fit to be President.
Posted by: plantain_11 | November 30, 2011, 7:38 am 7:38 am
jonny | November 30, 2011, 7:27 am 7:27 am _______________ Well folks, Johnny, also known as Miss Cleo, says it is all over for the President. According to him, Obama has NO chance and the American people are so impressed and blown away by this great group of republican candidates, they have this election in the bag. So I guess that’s it. You can all go home now.
Posted by: tony v | November 30, 2011, 7:50 am 7:50 am
I can understand what’s going on here. Obama’s approval rating is dropping faster than a rock in water. Secondly, there is no way Obama can debate Newt on the issues, any issues in any debate, Newt would absolutely mop the floor with Obama. Unless Obama got to read his responses from a teleprompter, Obama can’t speak off the cuff without stumbling like a fool. I think it would be so bad that I would feel uncomfortable watching.
Given that, the only way to tear Newt down is to bring up this so-called baggage and make that the focus point every time anyone brings up anything to do with Newt.
As far as baggage itself goes, everyone has it, even Obama, yet he got elected. Getting elected with baggage depends on the media. If they ignore it, so will the public (think Obama). If they focus on it every day in every article about that person, the public can’t ignore it.
Posted by: angie | November 30, 2011, 7:59 am 7:59 am
Talk about a flip-flopper! He can’t even decide on a religion!
Posted by: WorkingClass | November 30, 2011, 8:09 am 8:09 am
angie, What “Obama baggage” are you talking about? Let me guess, he’s not a citizen, is not really eligible to be President, and he is a muslim that intends to invoke sharia law.
Posted by: Tony V | November 30, 2011, 8:12 am 8:12 am
When will Obama finally get his proctology exam like the Repubicans do. The left wing coverup media, can they get anymore corrupt?
Posted by: Andy | November 30, 2011, 8:12 am 8:12 am
Typical narcissistic republican. My way is right, and it’s my way or the highway.
Posted by: Buddy Gold | November 30, 2011, 8:23 am 8:23 am
Tony V — How about: Rezko, Ayres, Wright, Drug use, Grades, Unemployment, Failed stimulus,. Record deficit, Obamacare, 401ks in the toilet, Record foreclosures, Record bankruptcies, Green loans/Political payback, Suing border states, OWS support… stuf like that. And you ask “What “Obama baggage”. LOL. Oh no, Obama has no baggage, he’s squeaky clean – right?
Posted by: Logicsgood5 | November 30, 2011, 8:26 am 8:26 am
“partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country, that I worked far too hard.”
…What a load. He apparently wasn’t working too hard since he found time to screw around. The only reason Newt wants to be president is because his trophy wife wants to be Queen Callista, I mean, the FLOTUS. Huntsmann is the only Republican candidate that is both qualified, sane, and not obnoxious.
Posted by: Catherine | November 30, 2011, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Logicsgood5_________WHAT ABOUT THEM?? All that was covered by the media and was found to be baseless or of no significance, or NO PROOF!! The comments made by your fellow righties is that the media was “covering up” things about the President. All of that has been covered time and time and time again.And are you serious “his grades”? LOL Don’t be ridiculous. Who said the President was squeaky clean? Nobody. You need to get a grip and face the fact that the gop field is the weakest it has been in over 50yrs. They are a joke and a side show.
Posted by: Tony V | November 30, 2011, 8:43 am 8:43 am
Tony V (8:43 AM); ” All that was covered by the media and was found to be baseless or of no significance, or NO PROOF!!” Have you just arrived from planet Obot?
Posted by: newcountryman | November 30, 2011, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Tony V — You are a perfect example of what I’m talking about. You think the only baggage Obama has is the ridiculous over-the-top stuff. Thank the media for that. Have they done any real journalism on any of the things LogicsGood mentioned? I think not.
Another tactic to not talk about baggage is sure to come up here from the Obama bloggers. Their answer to any Obama baggage is as follows: Fox news blah blah blah right-wing radio blah blah blah blame Bush blah blah blah both sides are bad blah blah blah Obama great blah blah blah
Posted by: angie | November 30, 2011, 8:54 am 8:54 am
Hey Newt, since you are now a good christian man now remember this one. Pride goest before destruction and a haughty spirit before the fall. Ruthless ambition will always collapse.
Posted by: howdymo1 | November 30, 2011, 8:57 am 8:57 am
Howdymo1; Newt certainly doesn’t have a lock on ruthless ambition if you get my drift.
Posted by: newcountryman | November 30, 2011, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Looks like the “party of family values” gets an attitude when their dirty laundry has a light shown on it. LOL
Posted by: Tony V | November 30, 2011, 9:19 am 9:19 am
Newcountryman: Yeah, Perry seems to fit into that category as well. Anyone with connections to Grover Norquist and Tom Delay fits into that category. Speaking of which, why isn’t the hammer in jail yet? He did get a 3 year sentence.
Posted by: howdymo1 | November 30, 2011, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Howdymo1; Why isn’t the hammer in jail yet? Maybe they’re waiting for a cell to open up in the block where Obama’s friend Rezko now lives.
Posted by: newcountryman | November 30, 2011, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Howdymo1; The “hammer” is out pending the outcome of his appeal. Good old Tony is now looking at a stainless steel sink and toilet. Oh, Boeing is up tp $67/share. Your man Obama is a freaking genius!
Posted by: newcountryman | November 30, 2011, 9:49 am 9:49 am
No, he can’t.
Posted by: pksk531 | November 30, 2011, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Eighty-four ethics charges were filed against Speaker Gingrich during his term, including claiming tax-exempt status for a college course run for political purposes. Following an investigation by the House Ethics Committee Gingrich was sanctioned. Gingrich acknowledged in January 1997 that “In my name and over my signature, inaccurate, incomplete and unreliable statements were given to the committee”. The House Ethics Committee concluded that inaccurate information supplied to investigators represented “intentional or … reckless” disregard of House rules. The special Counsel concluded that Gingrich violated federal tax law and had lied to the ethics panel in an effort to force the committee to dismiss the complaint against him. He has always been about the money.
Posted by: cb | November 30, 2011, 10:27 am 10:27 am
I really don’t care about what Gingrich has done in his personal life; the guy is a phony anyway. He claims to be an historian but has very little understanding of the history he reads. His books are more science fiction than history. He speculates on what might have happened if certain events never happened, example, what if the Japanese had won WWII. Sorry Newt, they didn’t, so any thing you write is pure fantasy.
Posted by: tmferretti | November 30, 2011, 11:22 am 11:22 am
When will Obama finally get his proctology exam like the Republicans do. The left wing coverup media, can they get anymore corrupt?
Posted by: Andy | November 30, 2011, 8:12 am.
LOL! Typical Republican whining. Are you saying that the Republican Party did NOT do their job in researching Obama back in 2007 and 2008? That they didn’t bother to look into his past? And FOX didn’t bother to do any research on him either? Or World Net Daily? LOL! Yeah, sure. And I would LOVE to see your proof or evidence of ‘Left Wing media corruption’. But of course, you don’t have any………….
Posted by: Searambler | November 30, 2011, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Simple answer: NO. Because the “new Newt” is the same old Newt he’s always been. Corrupt, ethically-challenged, immoral, egotistical, arrogant, and opportunistic. No news here. He’s just doing and saying what he thinks he needs to in order to get elected. And for anyone willing to pay the going price.
Posted by: Dr. bubba | November 30, 2011, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
If Newt is such an historian why hasn’t he read about how we got out of the great depression? Lots of government spending, that’s how. It doesn’t matter if it was for FDRs jobs programs or arming for WWII. As I said he speculates and doesn’t understand the lesson.
Posted by: tmferretti | November 30, 2011, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Newt is the biggest hypocrite. Impeaching the POTUS for oral sex with Monica Lewinsky, while he himself, is having an affair with a woman young enough to be his daughter and cheating on a sick wife to boot. Newt seems to believe that marrying this woman makes it ok. Calista Gingrich is not worthy of being FLOTUS. She is a sleazy golddigger. Newt is all about making money hand of fist so that he can make a fool of himself with much younger women. That complied with his 84 ethics violations make him someone who is not worthy, in my humble opinion of being the leader of the free world.
Posted by: formerlymiddleclass | December 1, 2011, 12:07 am 12:07 am
“Can the ‘New Newt’ Shed Past Baggage?”——————-not in a general election but in the primaries he’s fine. Republican voters don’t hold their own to the same scrutiny they hold others to. If they did not one republican serving in Congress would get reelected after their blatant disdain for the working class.
Posted by: DK | December 1, 2011, 6:31 am 6:31 am
Man I read this article found on the net by searching for all this supposed “baggage” that Newt has. This article like everything else I have found can do nothing more than list a bunch of nothing. I remember Newts historical success which was more than Washington could handle. His desire to be transparent and accountable with his Contract w America was too much for the typical sneaky washington politicians on both sides. He stepped on toes and hurt the feelings of so many who remain jealous and resentful. He told press members wherer to go too and they pay him back today even with headlines like the one in this article. This aint baggage, this is evidence of getting things done. This time with a FOX News around, no compromising by Newt will needed. Trust me. As far as character, huh, dont even think he is anywhere near as low as Pelosi for example. Plus he has matured. I will continue to search for some real baggage on Newt Gingrich. I am afraid it does not really exist. All I can personally recall was how rediculously unfair he was treated by the press and how he would once in a while after attack and attack he would react. I also remember loving it when he would do so. Remember there was no FOX fairness around back then. I was sad when he decideed HIMSELF to resign. More like History not BAGGAGE. I am a fundamental born again Christian too.
Posted by: grayeagle1000 | December 9, 2011, 3:01 am 3:01 am