Nov 18, 2011 8:09am

Clinton on GOP Criticism on Iran Policy: ‘Iran Cannot Be Permitted to Have a Nuclear Weapon; No Option Is Off the Table’

gty hillary clinton dm 111118 wblog Clinton on GOP Criticism on Iran Policy: Iran Cannot Be Permitted to Have a Nuclear Weapon; No Option Is Off the Table

Michael Loccisano/Getty Images

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton refrained from wallowing into the political waters stirred during the recent Republican presidential debate, when the Obama administration’s foreign policy – especially as it pertains to Iran – was assailed.

But asked about Mitt Romney’s pledge that Iran would never obtain a nuclear weapon during his presidency, and Romney’s assertion that he would more aggressively remind the Iranians that he would be willing to use military means to end their nuclear weapons capability, Clinton reiterated that “it is the policy of this administration that Iran cannot be permitted to have a nuclear weapon and no option has ever been taken off the table.”

Clinton said that “President Obama has forged a consensus in the international community, including China and Russia, to a much greater extent than was ever done before. … The sanctions are really having an impact, and there will be … more to come if necessary.”

TAPPER: The foreign policy of the Obama administration was under fire a few days ago when the Republicans had a debate. Particularly the Iran policy, which so far has failed to convince the Iranian leadership to stop pursuing a nuclear weapon. Mitt Romney, the Republican front-runner, said that if he was president he would be more aggressive about asserting the fact the military option is on the table. He would be reaching out more to what he called the insurgency. And he said under the Romney administration, Iran would not get a nuclear weapon. Can the Obama administration make such a guarantee?

CLINTON: Well first of all, I’m not going to comment on the political give and take of the Republican primary. That’s something that, uh, I’m really not paying a lot of attention to –

TAPPER: — Sure, but the issue itself –

CLINTON: But the issue itself, I think that what has actually happened over the last three years is that President Obama has forged a consensus in the international community, including China and Russia, to a much greater extent than was ever done before. You get no argument now from anybody that, uh, we want to work together to prevent Iran from having a nuclear weapon.

And I think we’ve made progress. The sanctions are really, having an impact and there will be, you know, more to come if necessary. And what we are looking at is what’s going on inside Iran. There’s a lot of discontent. A lot of political upheaval and some of that is due to the pressure that is being brought to bear from the outside.

So, you know, I understand politics. I’ve spent a lot of my life in it, but I think looking at the facts, uh, we are, uh, on a steady course that combines our dual tracks of pressure and engagement and it is the policy of this administration that Iran cannot be permitted to have a nuclear weapon and no option has ever been taken off the table

User Comments

“CLINTON: But the issue itself, I think that what has actually happened over the last three years is that President Obama has forged a consensus in the international community, including China and Russia”……..That consensus is to talk, talk, talk and do little, little, little. Has it halted Iran’s progress? As soon as Iran has it, expect and EMP (or 3)!

Posted by: deanbob | November 18, 2011, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Hate to burst your bubble, Iran will have nuclar weapons, when you have a weak leadership who bows to everyone thats what you get.

Posted by: Lizzie | November 18, 2011, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Lizzie | November 18, 2011, 8:44 am post —————- Tell the truth: are you Rush Limbaugh? Because you post so many things that come directly from his oversized pie hole………….

Posted by: Searambler | November 18, 2011, 8:57 am 8:57 am

I remember when “Red” China was called a “Paper Tiger” and now China holds the Paper of the United States and the United States is becoming a “Paper Tiger” under the leadership of the fearless leadership of President Obama!

Posted by: Common _ Sense | November 18, 2011, 9:26 am 9:26 am

OMG you Republican Obama-haters…weak leader??? He’s made the USA look stronger and fearsome in the last 3 years (Bin Laden, Ghadafi, other Al-Queda leaders wiped out) than our country has looked in a long time. First you say he wasn’t aggressive enough with Libya, then he goes in there and you say why is he doing that???? You guys are MESSED UP, just like your freak show of candidates!

Posted by: america2929 | November 18, 2011, 10:08 am 10:08 am

If the GOP wants to have a battle over foreign policy bring it on. Obama with Clinton at State has gotten the job done, after the hellstorm unleashed by the Bush/Cheney bungles, blunders and boondoggles.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | November 18, 2011, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Yes there is an option. If Israel goes Lone Wolf and pulls a surprise attack on Iran Obama needs to step up and declare that if Israel want to play Lone Wolf that they will be treated as such and that we will not be caught up in their escalation towards a violence that could spread across the world. The Muslim world will be left speechless and we might then finally prove to them that we really do not support International Lawlessness. Have we not learned anything? J.F.K. stood down Russian nukes in Cuba without a single shot. Why then can we not reign in Israel? For Obama to have told China;s Hu that this nation cannot do much more to keep Israel from such an attack made us look like a toothless Tiger. That’s just not right.

Posted by: Daniel Victor | November 18, 2011, 10:32 am 10:32 am

If I were the President, I wouldn’t even reply to these idiots. I don’t think one of them knows what “covert” means. A retired CIA director blasted them yesterday for talking too much. Especially Bachman since she’s on the House intelligence committee.

Posted by: tmferretti | November 18, 2011, 10:49 am 10:49 am

“Especially Bachman since she’s on the House intelligence committee.”

And isn’t THAT the biggest oxymoron of all time…..!

Posted by: Searambler | November 18, 2011, 11:14 am 11:14 am

“….no option has ever been taken off the table.” i.e. We’re not sure exactly what we’re going to do at this point.

Posted by: newcountryman | November 18, 2011, 11:57 am 11:57 am

NEWCOUNTRYMAN

What we do know is we’re not going to nuke Iran soon or send 20,000 troops to destroy their nuclear facilities. The President is like John Kennedy; don’t put American servicemen or the public in danger because it will get you political points if you act tough.

The last thing we need is a mis-calculation when nuclear weapons are involved. The keys are if Syria falls and isolates Iran, if the Russians and the Chinese agree to tougher sanctions.

Posted by: tmferretti | November 18, 2011, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.