Nov 3, 2011 6:57pm

DOMA Vote Delayed in Senate Judiciary Until Next Week

The Senate Judiciary Committee met today to discuss legislation that would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), but after a procedural holdup the legislation has been delayed until next week for a vote.

Passed in 1996, DOMA defines marriage as “a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife.”

The Respect for Marriage Act, which was introduced in March of this year, would provide federal protection to couples married in states that recognize same-sex marriages.

“DOMA has created a tier of second-class families who are not treated equally under the law,” said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. “This runs counter to the values upon which America was founded.”

The bill would redefine marriage to be determined by the states, as it historically has been.

“The Respect for Marriage Act would restore the power of states to define and determine ‘marriage’ without the federal government imposing its restrictive definition of marriage on the states,” said Leahy.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) echoed Leahy’s remarks.

“It has been firmly established over decades, that family law, including marriage,” is a law handled by the states.

Six states and the District of Columbia have legalized same-sex marriages.

“When DOMA passed, no state had passed a same sex marriage bill,” Feinstein said during the meeting. “Where now, today, there are 131,000 same-sex couples in the United States. They are real people. They’re our family members, our friends, our neighbors. They made a solid commitment of marriage to each other.”

Leahy and Feinstein, who are two of the cosponsors of the bill, were quick to point out that nothing in the bill would force any state or religion to perform same-sex marriages, simply recognize the “1100 federal rights and benefits provided to every other legally married couple in the country,” said Feinstein.

Some of the rights that are not awarded to same-sex marriages include filing joint income taxes, veterans’ benefits, employment benefits and immigration laws.

“All married couples deserve the same clarity, fairness, and security under our Federal law,” said Leahy. “The time has come for the Federal Government to recognize that all married couples deserve the same legal protections.”

Republicans on the committee today requested that the vote be delayed until next week. However, the legislation is expected to pass the panel when it comes to a vote, as it is supported by all ten Democrats on the committee.  After that the legislation will go to the full Senate for consideration.

 

 

 

User Comments

“Passed in 1996, DOMA defines marriage as “a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife.”” – ABC News

Yep, that’s what it is.
The other thing is called
G a r r i a g e

Posted by: Noz | November 3, 2011, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

A delay in recinding a law that violates the 4th article of the US Constitution (to name one) is just delaying the inevitable. No need to waste valuable time debating. toss DOMA out and move on to more important issues like economic reform and job creation.

Posted by: Wayne | November 3, 2011, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

There is absolutely NO REASON to repeal DOMA it protests our kids and our families from the few who seek to destroy the moral fabric of our country!

Posted by: RadioMan77 | November 3, 2011, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Lots of American’s are missing the point. You’re all stating PROTECT MARRIAGE. TRADITION. That is not what DOMA will be repealing.
There is already Legal GAY MARRIAGES – they have all ready happened. Repealing section 3 of DOMA allows these LEGAL same sex married couples to Federal Benefits and prtections: Filing tax jointly, immigration benefits. This law bans America’s couples who are married 1,338 civil rights, which are given to their married brothers and sisters. It needs to be repealed as it’s not equal.

The point about marriage is not up for debate. It’s all ready happen! So, if it has already occurred, I am not clear why your children need protecting – unless you’re making them marry a gay person when they are not gay! Morals and religion have no place in law making!

Posted by: Jamie | November 4, 2011, 1:48 am 1:48 am

“Religion have no place in law making!” I agree !
DOMA – DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, RIGHT?
So, the law should be about make DIVORCE a ILLEGAL ACT! So all your Marriage would be defended and protect and all the straight people would live HAPPY FOVEREVER ! How about that!
If you are concern about the future of your kids, one more reason to dont MIX RELIGION and LAW.
Just think about in 50years the majority of this Country become Muslin,
Oh My… did you get? All American women using BURKA and having no say and no rights (because their religion believes turning into LAW) How about that?
DOMA was and still a MISTAKE and an ACT of HATE !
Give me a rational reason, when in the 60s INTER RACIAL MARRIAGE were forbidden by law, WHY?
DOMA is the same kind of HATE LAW!
The ignorance of people it the fuel for this kind of law!
This will come to an end! Just like in the 50/60′s The Supreme Court of US will put an end to this Stupid LAW, just because like at that time people were thinking that would be the end of the world having “black people” going to school if my “white boy” or a “black man” marring my “white little girl”
OH MY !
What … man marring man ! this id the end of the world ! ! ! ! RUN RUN RUN!
Stupidity!

Posted by: Dom | November 4, 2011, 7:22 am 7:22 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.