Nov 29, 2011 1:05am

Gingrich Slams Obama for South Carolina Immigration Lawsuit

Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich touched on a local issue when speaking at a packed town hall meeting in Charleston, South Carolina Monday night. The GOP hopeful had harsh words for President Obama for allowing the U.S. Department of Justice to sue the state of South Carolina over its immigration law.

“Clearly the Obama administration has been comfortable allowing foreign governments to enter a lawsuit against an American state. So here’s a simple way to think of it: President Obama sided with Mexico, I would side with South Carolina,” Gingrich said.

South Carolina’s law imposes proof of U.S. citizenship for a person caught committing a crime or pulled over in a car by law enforcement. The DOJ says the state’s law will distract law enforcement from other duties as well as result in the harassment and detention of “foreign visitors and legal immigrants, as well as U.S. citizens, who cannot readily prove their lawful status.” The DOJ is allowing foreign countries to join in on the law suit against the state.

Gingrich said tonight that President Obama should not allow the law suit to proceed, nor should he allow other countries to join.

“No American president has the right to side with foreigners against the people and laws of the states of the U.S.,” Gingrich said. “We can have internal family fights and that’s fine, but we should have a very clear rule that the people of the U.S. do not want a president who’s confused about whose right they’re defending.”

Gingrich’s comments were well received by the crowd, which erupted with applause and cheers over his stance. Gingrich also took the time to revisit his stance on immigration and once again restated his position on securing the border, but allowing established families to remain in the U.S. legally. Those allowed to stay would be selected in the same style as a WWII selective service board, which would take individual cases within the community. Gingrich has not presented how or if exactly this could be accomplished.

Gingrich’s moderate position on allowing long-established illegal immigrants to stay in the U.S. was discussed last week by his Republican opponents Tuesday’s CNN debate, where Gingrich later had to clarify he was not for amnesty of 11 million illegal immigrants.

Candidate Michele Bachmann released several mass e-mails last week saying Gingrich was in fact for amnesty.

Gingrich said he was not for amnesty but does not “believe you’ll ever pass a bill to hunt down every single person who’s been here for a quarter century.”

Gingrich will continue to campaign in South Carolina tomorrow where he attends another town hall.

User Comments

South Carolina’s law imposes proof of U.S. citizenship for a person caught committing a crime or pulled over in a car by law enforcement. So in other words the law gives police the right to detain anyone riding in a car, during a traffic stop, who doesn’t’ t have an ID or Passport on them that looks foreign or has an accent? I could win this case and I don’t work for the justice department. And Newts comment shows you can’t predict what he’ll say next. One day the media is portraying him as being lenient on immigration and the next he’s on board with locking them all up. I think the world should adopt the same policies and we will see Politicians lose their minds when our citizens are locked up every time they leave their ID back in the hotel room. That’s the way it would have to be enforced in South Carolina (everyone who doesn’t have proof would be detained) or it would be considered racial profiling.

Posted by: focusonjobs1 | November 29, 2011, 1:46 am 1:46 am

I thought that it was President Obama’s policy to only deport illegals who commit a crime. Now the President doesn’t allow states to check for proof of U.S. citizenship for a person caught committing a crime or pulled over in a car by law enforcement! WOW!!!!

Posted by: Common _ Sense | November 29, 2011, 7:23 am 7:23 am

Even if you are a German automotive executive you need to carry proof of identification! LOL

Posted by: Common _ Sense | November 29, 2011, 7:50 am 7:50 am

If you’re an American-Asian, American-Hispanic, American-African hell, even an American-Indian…. LOL! … if you’re anything other than American-Caucasian….you better have your proof of citizenship on YOU in South Carolina, or else! That, ladies and gentlemen, is what Gingrich supports.

Posted by: Republicans = a BUNCH of Forrest Gumps | November 29, 2011, 8:07 am 8:07 am

And how do they prove their citizenship? I have seen illegals with licenses and I do not always carry ID with me if I do not need it. This is very problematic and will open up the courts to scads of lawsuits about racial profiling, discrimination, etc. It is almost unenforceable!!! Just do not drive in South Carolina – or ride in a car or … just don’t go there!

Posted by: pksk531 | November 29, 2011, 8:36 am 8:36 am

There is no such thing as proof of citizenship, except your birth certificate, and who the heck carries that with them everywhere they go?. Your SS Card and Drivers license prove nothing!.

Posted by: MiketheElectrician | November 29, 2011, 8:47 am 8:47 am

Why does the GOP have to go to extremes? South Carolina is just another example of an extreme right wing state imposing its draconian solutions on non-white people.

Posted by: Bob | November 29, 2011, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Obama and the DOJ, are doing everything they can, to prevent anyone from stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into this country. They are doing that deliberately, and are failing totally in their obligation to enforce our laws.

That can only be viewed, as SUBVERSIVE activity!

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | November 29, 2011, 9:55 am 9:55 am

First time in my life I’ve ever heard so much of an attempt by the Federal government to unsurp states rights. Who ever heard of the Department Justice suing states? This is telling.

Posted by: newcountryman | November 29, 2011, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Ok, so is everyone in agreement that we should all carry proof of citizenship and be required to show it upon immediate request by a police officer? Lol

Posted by: genhrules | November 29, 2011, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Actually I am a supporter of president Obama and although I wouldn’t vote for Newt Gingrich, he does make a point about foreign government suits, I find it a little baffling that Mexico should have a suit a little hypocritical considering what they do to their own illegal immigrants. However, considering the way the GOP behaves towards our president, can understand his stance with supporting the rights of people in general, his heart is in the right place, but I just don’t agree with these foreign government suits.

Posted by: phantomniter | November 29, 2011, 11:49 am 11:49 am

So I’m adopted and my birth certificate — that was issued by the government and supposedly proves my US citizenship—-is 100% fake. Does anyone else see the hypocrisy of that?

Posted by: Brenny | November 29, 2011, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Documents show that Obama, Sr. was denied an extension on his student visa in July, 1964, in part because Harvard University, where Obama, Sr., was a Ph.D. candidate, sought his removal. Obama Sr. eventually left the United States willingly after becoming an illegal alien for remaining in the country past the expiration of his visa.

Posted by: newcountryman | November 30, 2011, 6:28 am 6:28 am

If you’re driving a car you are required to have your drivers license with you.
Why is that considered racist ?

Posted by: Don | January 10, 2012, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.