Nov 12, 2011 11:02pm

GOP Candidates Blast CBS News’ for ‘Disgraceful’ Bias at South Carolina Debate

SPARTANBURG, S.C. — Fireworks were few and far between at the GOP’s foreign policy debate tonight, but if any issue provoked the ire of some candidates it was not each other but rather how CBS News’ moderator Scott Pelley ran the event.

Numerous candidates from Rep. Michele Bachmann to Rep. Ron Paul complained about unfair treatment from the network, arguing that rival campaigns had received far more attention during the debate. The Bachmann campaign went so far as to release an email that they said spokeswoman Alice Stewart had “inadvertently received” from CBS earlier in the day.

In the email string, CBS News’ political analyst John Dickerson said that Bachmann was “not going to get many questions during the debate and she’s nearly off the charts,” a reference to the Minnesota congresswoman’s low standing in the polls.

After the debate Stewart said that CBS News was guilty of “a bias” against Bachmann.

“I inadvertently received an email where CBS made it clear that Michele was going to receive fewer questions than the other candidates. Clearly this is a problem,” Stewart said. “The debates are an opportunity for the candidates to share their views on the issues. This is an important issue for Congresswoman Bachmann. She’s a member of the House, the Foreign Intelligence Committee. She knows this issue unlike the other candidates on this stage and the email chain that I inadvertently received clearly indicates a bias on CBS’ part to limit the questions to Congresswoman Bachmann.

“We had discussions about [it] and they indicated that they would make sure that the level — that the playing field would be level,” Stewart added. “However she received substantially fewer questions than the other candidates and she wasn’t allowed any follow-ups.

“There’s nothing that can be done now. The debate’s over,” Stewart said. “They assured us prior to debate that it was going to be a fair and level playing field and it certainly wasn’t. We didn’t want to have to get the word out but they made it clear to us that it was going to be fair and it wasn’t.”

Other candidates also complained about their treatment during the debate.

Paul’s spokesman Jesse Benton accused CBS of “disgraceful” actions that stemmed from an “arrogance” in thinking that “they can choose the next president.”

“Ron Paul consistently polls among the top three in the key early voting states of Iowa and New Hampshire,” Benton said in a statement. “He is polling in double digits in most respected polls. Congressman Paul is ranked among the top three in fundraising results. Congressman Paul serves on the House Foreign Relations Committee. Congressman Paul is a veteran. And, Congressman Paul has contrasting views on foreign policy that many Americans find worthy of inquiry and discussion. CBS’s treatment of Congressman Paul is disgraceful, especially given that tonight’s debate centered on foreign policy and national security.

“Congressman Paul was only allocated 90 seconds of speaking in one televised hour,” Benton said. “If we are to have an authentic national conversation on issues such as security and defense, we can and must do better to ensure that all voices are heard. CBS News, in their arrogance, may think they can choose the next president. Fortunately, the people of Iowa, New Hampshire, and across America get to vote and not the media elites.”

Bachmann and Paul were not the only ones who complained. During the debate itself, former Utah Gov. and ambassador to China Jon Huntsman at one point remarked, “Gets a little lonely over here in Siberia.” To which former Sen. Rick Santorum quipped, “Tell me about it.”

Afterwards CBS News spokeswoman Sonya McNair shrugged off the Bachmann flap, saying, “It was a candid exchange about the reality of the circumstances — Bachmann remains at 4 percent in the polls.”

Pelley even waded into the spin room himself, but he did not want to comment on the candidates’ complaints.

“I’ll tell you that the time for all of the candidates was limited. We had an hour and a half. We had eight candidates,” Pelley told reporters. “I’ll also tell you we spent an enormous amount of time, several weeks, counting all of the questions of all the candidates, making sure everyone had a fair shot. Gov. Huntsman, who is polling around 1 percent at this point, made a point of coming up to me on stage and said, ‘I really appreciate how much you talked to the candidates who are not polling very high in numbers.’ So I think the candidates felt they were well treated.”

Clearly, though, that was not the case.

Matthew Jaffe is covering the 2012 campaign for ABC News and Univision.

ABC News’ Michael Falcone, Emily Friedman, Susan Archer, Elicia Dover, Arlette Saenz & Jason Volack contributed to this report.

SHOWS:

User Comments

She’s never going to win, why waste America’s time with her? She had her chance. She bombed. Maybe she can pray away the bias.

Posted by: sameagain | November 12, 2011, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

I didn’t watch the debate tonight. Sounds like I didn’t miss anything new. Incompetent candidates, arrogant moderators, stupified audence. Yawn…..

Posted by: munster42 | November 12, 2011, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

CBS disgusted me with this debate. I will not vote anyone other than Ron Paul this election for many reasons.

Posted by: Alex | November 12, 2011, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

What a whiner.

Posted by: Jim Bob jr. | November 12, 2011, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

“However she received substantially fewer questions than the other candidates and she wasn’t allowed any follow-ups.”

That is simply not true. She got more questions than Ron Paul who polls more than double what she is currently polling. This is how many questions were given in the first nationally televised hour:

Perry – 5 questions, 2 follow ups

Newt – 5 questions, 1 follow up

Cain – 5 questions, 1 follow up

Romney – 4 questions, 1 follow up

Santorum – 3 questions, 2 follow ups

Bachman – 3 questions

Huntsman – 2 questions, 1 follow up

Paul – 1 question, 1 follow up

Posted by: Amaranthe | November 12, 2011, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Conservative candidates. Don’t let the “LIBERAL” controlled News Media give you a death punch. Fight back and stand your ground and say what you want to their crooked ways. Always remember, “God is watching”. And as for you “SAMEAGAIN”, if I don’t get this posted then I know that Liberals and their Agenda are behind everything that goes on on all these political news media and Blogs. I would rather die a CONSERVATIVE than have lived my life as a Thick headed Liberal.

Posted by: Bill Caldwell | November 12, 2011, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Waaa Waaa Waaa! Bachmann, Paul, Huntsman, and Santorum will NEVER be candidates on a national ticket unless they run a third-party campaign. (As a Democrat, I say, PLEASE GO FOR IT!) None of them have anything relevant to say regarding the direction this country will take. Why are they even asked any questions? Great example of “killing the messenger” syndrome.

Posted by: J S O'Brien | November 12, 2011, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

True. Michelle Bachmann actually got a fair amount of questions. She is polling very low numbers.

Posted by: Alex | November 12, 2011, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Paul is polling in 3rd in both Iowa/New Hampshire and received 90 seconds out of 60 minutes. Assuming for a minute that they were to divide time equally among all candidates, each candidate should’ve received a little over 7 minutes a piece to speak, factoring in the one 5 minute commercial break.

Complete joke.

Posted by: Sean | November 12, 2011, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

Thank-you Matthew Jaffe! CBS should be ashamed. Ron Paul 2012

Posted by: Paulpatriot | November 12, 2011, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Though shafted once again, Ron Paul clearly won tonight.

Posted by: keredte | November 12, 2011, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

WE WILL NOT HAVE A SITTING DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT IN JANUARY OF 2013!

Posted by: William Caldwell | November 12, 2011, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Ducks always quack the loudest just before they go over the falls. Stick a fork in ‘em, they’re done. Their goose is cooked. Their wings were clipped. Their ideas don’t fly.

Posted by: sameagain | November 12, 2011, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Weirdo Huntsman is happy because he is polling at 1% and was treated like a top-tier candidate by CBS as was Santorium. Paul is a top-tier candidate and was treated as Huntsman and Santronium should have been.

Posted by: Ed Ward II | November 12, 2011, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Thank you Matthew Jaffe! CBS should be totally ashamed of themselves!!! Ron Paul 2012

Posted by: paulpatriot | November 12, 2011, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Bachmann got plenty of time to speak–which is largely a waste given she never answers a question but shifts into her inane talking points. At least FactCheck will be busy. It is hard to believe from watching the debate that she sits on the Foreign Intelligence Committee–she must sit on the Foreign side of the table????

Posted by: Silence_DoOkay | November 12, 2011, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

All these Pentagon, coporate media presstites have become so irrevelant and biased, I doubt these alphabet soup sites hardly get any traffic at all after the election. I sure wouldn’t believe anything they come up with.

Posted by: Iva | November 12, 2011, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

The debate was not balanced between the candidates. CBS did not allow the full time on network for the event, cutting the network broadcast short. While Pelly attempted to keep to the time schedule, it was too rigid, I suspect partly because they were cutting off 30 mins. prior to the end of the debate.

The format of these debates is too limiting. Too many questions, for the time frame, not enough fairness in allowing each candidate to respond to a particular question, and some candidates got extra questions, while others did not.

Poor job, CBS.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | November 12, 2011, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

@J S O’Brien – Your logic is completely flawed. Why are they even asked any questions? Because as much as you may not like it they are a part of this process and these debates are supposed to be their chance to get their message out and turn those low numbers around that you claim are the reason they shouldn’t be asked any questions. Bottom line, the questions should have been divided equally among the candidates and if they weren’t then shame on whoever was responsible for that!

Posted by: Henry | November 12, 2011, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

typical. Republicans blaming others for their failures. And get over your Paul obession. He has NO CHANCE to win a general election. you’re LUCKY if you dont make him your candidate. YOu have ONE chance at winning in a general election and we all know who that is. deal with reality.

Posted by: GrannyNosBest | November 12, 2011, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

I didn’t see the debate, but Bachman and Santorum (and probably Huntsman even though he’s likable) should quit now. And I’m not surprised Paul wasn’t heard, but he hasn’t exactly been active in trying to get his answer in during the last two debates I did watch.

Posted by: zomgz | November 12, 2011, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

@Alex That’ll show ‘em!

Posted by: dubyateeeff | November 12, 2011, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

That’s right granny, it’s going to be Romney vs Obama. Two Democrats. Head to head. May the best man win.

Posted by: sameagain | November 12, 2011, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

I will vote for the most qualified canidates, the only 2 I see as qualified too leed is Ron Paul, and Newt Gingrich. All the other candidates well….I will vote for Ron Paul 2012….CBS you can ban Ron Paul all you want but we the people will vote him in.

Posted by: Stuart | November 12, 2011, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Just sad. The also-ran’s think they’re doing themselves a favor by acting like a bunch of petulant kindergartners. Why would any one vote for someone that acts this way?

Posted by: SFRussell1963 | November 13, 2011, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Any of these candidates would beat BO. He’s done. Stick a fork in him. He’s only lined Wall Street’s pockets with the indexes bouncing back while we continue to suffer through $3+ gas, $15T in debt and 9% unemployment. How is he better than Bush???

Posted by: BK.70 | November 13, 2011, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Will ABC promise to give Ron Paul AT LEAST equal time in their debate?
Will ABC promise to give Ron Paul AT LEAST equal time in their debate?
Will ABC promise to give Ron Paul AT LEAST equal time in their debate?

Posted by: Oscar | November 13, 2011, 12:07 am 12:07 am

even as a liberal, this disgusts me. everyone should get equal time, regardless of their incompetence and poll numbers.

Posted by: hey | November 13, 2011, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Either way, BO has lost the anti-war crowd. Not sure how many that adds up to, but he has obviously used them to help get into office. Then he betrayed them by carrying on and exanding Bush’s military actions. Priceless.

Posted by: BK.70 | November 13, 2011, 12:13 am 12:13 am

MSM ignoring Ron Paul. God, they must really think we’re a bunch of lemmings. This is why I won’t vote for anyone but Ron Paul. Is it that difficult to give each person on the stage equal time to speak? This was a poorly moderated debate. Shame on you ABC.

Posted by: Banksters_Rule_the_Rule | November 13, 2011, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Did not watch..they have no clue anyway…

Posted by: michel | November 13, 2011, 12:17 am 12:17 am

That’s right, Obama 2012.
More Wars 2012.
More corporate bailout 2012.
More War on Drugs 2012.
Bush’s 4th term, here it comes.

Posted by: Bill | November 13, 2011, 12:19 am 12:19 am

And BO has also lost many Jewish supporters.

Posted by: BK.70 | November 13, 2011, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Once again, the media shapes the debate. It shouldn’t matter if one person is polling higher than another — they’re all there to debate, and they all deserve equal time to express their views. Maybe if the public had a chance to actually hear from some of the other candidates, their numbers would rise. Instead, the media feeds the vicious circle — “their numbers are low, so we aren’t going to give them to talk, so their numbers will remain low.” Pathetic. It’s the media’s job to be impartial, not to pick favorites.

Posted by: Adrian | November 13, 2011, 12:25 am 12:25 am

What a bunch of crybabies. they should have learned in grammar school that whiners never win, and this is one more example of why the GOP presidential candidate next year is going to get walloped. I don’t think that Obama’s one of our stronger presidents, but he’s an order of magnitude better than anyone who participated in this debate. In fact, this group is so weak, that I now subscribe to the conspiracy theory that, somehow, the Dems managed to get a mole onto the RNC, with the orders to help develop the weakest lineup possible. No-one of this group is well balanced and intelligent enough to run this country. We’ve got the serial groper, the Constitutional originalist (how would she handle the upcominng support that’s going to be needed to prevent Europe’s Euro problems from cratering the US economy? The Constitution drafters never even considered the possibility of this kind of problem. Who could have imagined the concept of one currency for all of Europe 200 years ago. No-one, not even a financial genius like Alexander Hamilton. Also, MS. Bachman obviously doesn’t realize it, but she would have to shut down the Air Force, and Naval and Marine Corps aviation functions. Then we have Dr. Paul, who has a one string guitar on which he’s been playing the same discordant song for 20 years. I personally think that Mitt Romney is the best of the bunch, but that’s like being the best batter on a baseball team where everyone else has a batting average of about 115.

Every time this group gets up in front of the public, it lowers its prestige. All of them have forgotten Reagan’s 11th commandment, and he was the best Republican politician in the last half of the 20th century. I hope each of them doesn’t spend all of the money that’s been raised, because they’re going to need something to live on after the upcoming election, and, although they don’t seem to want to discuss any potential solutions, unemployment is a big problem in this country, which they will understand better a year from now Frankly, even Herbert Hoover, who was arguably the worst Republican president of the 20th century, looks better than anyone in this line-up.

Posted by: Steve Hamilton | November 13, 2011, 12:33 am 12:33 am

I emailed CBS to inform them I will no longer patronize them, nor their affiliates. I am also refusing to spend money with any of their sponsors. The blatant stonewalling of a candidate in such a manner is disgraceful.

The RP faithful need to start voting with their wallets.

Posted by: Warrant | November 13, 2011, 12:40 am 12:40 am

BK.70. I guess you haven’t read much US history. Where did you get the idea that the media is supposed to be fair? It hasn’t been since the first elections. In fact, it was incredibly one sided in the first 4 presidential elections, and on throughout the 19th century. It’s actually much less biased today than it was for the first 150 years following our defeat of the British in the late 1700′s. CBS did a pretty good job. Think what it might have been like if an organization controlled by Rupert Murdoch had hosted it Try learning a little bit more about the history of the country before you shoot your mouth off.

Posted by: Steve Hamilton | November 13, 2011, 12:45 am 12:45 am

discraceful? it goes far beyond that. Ron Paul is being blacked out of all media and now they are trying to black him out of the debate process. I will not vote for anyone other than Ron Paul because he has a really good message that the media is trying to prevent the people of this country from hearing.
Ron Paul 2012!

Posted by: bill | November 13, 2011, 12:48 am 12:48 am

It is time to send Perry, Bachman, Santorum, and Huntsman home.

Posted by: Tyler | November 13, 2011, 1:01 am 1:01 am

I will vote Ron Paul, he is the only one who can beat Obama. CBS sucks, I wish they can go to bankrupt.

Posted by: CARLOS | November 13, 2011, 1:09 am 1:09 am

CBS has always had a clear liberal bias. Does anyone remember Dan Rather? His election coverage was appauling. CBS has already made the decision who they want. So they skew the debate.

Posted by: RAS | November 13, 2011, 1:11 am 1:11 am

CBS debate was no worse than most of these things have been in the last 4 elections. All the media is doing, including CBS, is filling air time with an “event” to bring viewers to their televisions and keep them there as long as possible, up to and through the elections. Candidates are exhibits in a perverted carnival, and the goal is to make and shape public opinion. When real thought and expression becomes apparent (such as the comments from Ron Paul), the media distorts the message and marginalizes the messenger. The media must control its markets. The only acceptable result from this comedy is MONEY for the media rulers.

Posted by: RAY | November 13, 2011, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Screw CBS. These media elites get dumber and dumber by the day. Do they not think people notice? This isn’t 1960, people communicate more than ever now…. these corrupt morons just don’t get it. You can blackout Ron Paul all you want, but when you media guard dogs are long dead and forgotten, Ron Paul will be remembered and his impact felt and there is nothing you can do to stop it.

Posted by: Bill D | November 13, 2011, 1:46 am 1:46 am

That CBS debate was disgraceful… Sorry, that’s all I have to say about that.

Posted by: Ed | November 13, 2011, 1:56 am 1:56 am

The auditorium was filled with college students in the back of the room. These are some of Ron Paul’s most ardent and vocal supporters. They cheered when Paul was introduced and cheered loudly when he responded to THE question. I’m sure that CBS did not ask him any more questions as to stifle and minimize the cheers and approval that Ron Paul receives. We cant have the people actually see him getting support.

Posted by: Chuck Reichmuth | November 13, 2011, 1:57 am 1:57 am

For all you liberals out there.

1 Ron Paul has alreeady won by setting the direction of the debates and this nation.
2. Ron Paul CAN beat Obama in the general.
3. We don’t really care as much about Obama getting re-elected as we do about taking the house and senate so Obama is neutered if he does win because the GOP is stupid enough to put Romeny up against Obama like they did with McCain in 2008.

Posted by: C4LCNCPLS | November 13, 2011, 2:04 am 2:04 am

Matthew Jaffe for president of the media!

The rare, unbiased type that the media needs more of!

Posted by: Brian | November 13, 2011, 2:20 am 2:20 am

As pointed out, there is good evidence that Ron Paul is at the top and he was given the least, or close to the least amount of time to speak. That is unfair.

Posted by: Jeffrey | November 13, 2011, 2:32 am 2:32 am

AMARANTHE, I once was a thick headed neo-conservative. But thankfully do to coming to my senses and as well a reality of myself and the human race, I’ve turned into a much more open hearted, compassionate liberal that believes and stands up for the common man.

Posted by: Jeff C | November 13, 2011, 2:42 am 2:42 am

I watched the whole thing and the number of questions/follow-ups seemed about even to me. What I didn’t like was the CBS guy debating Gingrich about whether or not the killing of enemy combatants is legal. Next time, let that guy get on stage with the others if he wants us to hear his views.

Posted by: Dimslie | November 13, 2011, 3:30 am 3:30 am

I don’t support either Bachmann or Paul, but I must agree with them on this one. Deciding how much airtime to give a candidate based on poll results is rather arbitrary. Paul did well on several polls, but was still ignored on most of the debates.

Posted by: jdoe | November 13, 2011, 3:30 am 3:30 am

Perry – 5 questions, 2 follow ups
Newt – 5 questions, 1 follow up
Cain – 5 questions, 1 follow up
Romney – 4 questions, 1 follow up
Santorum – 3 questions, 2 follow ups
Bachman – 3 questions
Huntsman – 2 questions, 1 follow up
Paul – 1 question, 1 follow up

CBS also removed their online post-debate poll after Ron Paul won by 70%+.

Biased?

Posted by: Sganet | November 13, 2011, 4:09 am 4:09 am

I’ll be voting for Ron Paul and CBS can Kiss my A$$

Posted by: Ray | November 13, 2011, 4:22 am 4:22 am

I chose not to watch this debate for one reason and one reason only: CBS News was “moderating” it. It is the laughingstock of the industry, and has been for several years. I remember all too well how Congressman Paul was treated by them during the last election: With our economy deteriorating rapidly and Paul with much economic and foreign policy expertise, did they analyze the hard issues? Nope, they focused on the flashy “top tier” candidates exclusively on-air. What little coverage they gave Paul on their web site consisted of cut-and-paste monotony of their assessment of his “long-shot”, “quixotic” bid for the presidency, a Nevada brothel owner’s support of him and a political donation from a member of the Stormfront group. Yellow journalism as its absolute slimiest. Disgraceful is too mild of a word to use.

Posted by: Darryl Schmitz | November 13, 2011, 4:38 am 4:38 am

I love all these idiots who think romney will win against obama. I know that even if romney is named the nominee, I and many others will still write in dr pauls name on the ballot. Romney or any other republican simply will not win.

Posted by: versiano | November 13, 2011, 5:05 am 5:05 am

Ron Paul has a strong following anyone else in the GOP gets the nomination many of us will not be voting and your party could come crashing. Id highly advise people at least look into some of Ron Paul’s view points, watch a video or two on YouTube. I have never seen someone running for president make so much sense in my life. Shame on CBS for giving Ron Paul less than two minutes to speak in a full hour of the debate. Completely absurd.

Posted by: Alex | November 13, 2011, 5:29 am 5:29 am

“Paul’s spokesman Jesse Benton accused CBS of “disgraceful” actions that stemmed from an “arrogance” in thinking that “they can choose the next president.” “— Pretty funny comment being there wasn’t one person in the debate that will ever be the president.

Posted by: dan | November 13, 2011, 5:54 am 5:54 am

according to Jon Stewart, Ron Paul is the leader of his party, it’s just not the Republican party.

Posted by: dan | November 13, 2011, 6:02 am 6:02 am

Don’t ya think it’s a bit ironic Ron Paul supporters are calling for FCC intervention.

Posted by: dan | November 13, 2011, 6:08 am 6:08 am

Ron Paul all the way. He’s the only true American with some cojoles!!!
p.s Jews control the media, and Paul is the only one who is not as for Israel like the rest.
Stop the parasites!!!!

Posted by: mike cohen | November 13, 2011, 6:08 am 6:08 am

Ron Paul 2012.. he is true man and American!!!

Posted by: mike cohen | November 13, 2011, 6:09 am 6:09 am

It’s been the same thing EVERY debate. They skirt around Ron Paul and he’s the ONLY one on the stage with anything to say and push Romney shamelessly (who has NOTHING to say but political rhetoric). YELLOW JOURNALISM..

Posted by: Milo | November 13, 2011, 6:31 am 6:31 am

Let’s look at the logic here. There was 90 minutes for the debate (I didn’t watch). Assuming there were no commercial breaks that makes each of the 8 candidates have 11 1/4 minutes TOTAL airtime for the questions and follow ups. If there were commercial breaks (usually about 20 minutes per hour) 30 minutes for an hour and a half. That leaves 60 minutes and 7 1/2 minutes per candidate. Truthfully, more than 90 minutes of these jokers would have been way too much and honestly Michelle wouldn’t have been happy unless she got the entire 90 minutes all to herself. Gracious is not a word that fits into her vocabulary.

Posted by: howdymo1 | November 13, 2011, 6:50 am 6:50 am

Let Ron Paul speak with equal time. These debates are a joke.

Posted by: mom | November 13, 2011, 6:51 am 6:51 am

Jon Dickerson is an outrage to every freedom-loving American. Ron Paul is a top-tier candidate and was treated by CBS news, in getting only 3 questions, as low-lifes Huntsman and Santronium should have been. Ron Paul was heartily cheered on every answer for the few questions he got. Romney was booed. Huntsman was happy because he is polling at 1% and was treated like a top-tier candidate by CBS in the amount of questions he got as was Santorium. Cane knew nothing about anything – I can’t understand why he got any questions at all, or how he is in first place except that people are really getting dumber (certainly the Neocons are real dummies). For instance Scott Pelly has an IQ of about 80 I would guess.

Posted by: Ward Ciac | November 13, 2011, 7:36 am 7:36 am

Enough of the debates. They have served to fuel the media with fodder for the political pundits to attempt to be critical of any candidate at any time and there has never been and most likely never will be a level playing field. The media has always had an agenda and that it to re elect Obama by any means and these candidates have been playing right in there hands from the very start.

Posted by: remulak_4 | November 13, 2011, 7:47 am 7:47 am

Gingrich refused to be pitted against Romney.
We can all learn from Gingrich. We need an adult in the White House.

Posted by: Zoe D'Eau | November 13, 2011, 8:03 am 8:03 am

There’s no such thing as democracy in this country anymore.

Corporate America decides FOR you….

I feel sick to my stomach right now.

I will vote Ron Paul no matter what. Then I give up on this phony system.

Posted by: John Rambo | November 13, 2011, 8:08 am 8:08 am

Disgusting abc…..absolutely disgusting debate. This is the type of crap we’ve come to expect from the news media. Journalism is a thing of the past.

Posted by: John3 | November 13, 2011, 8:09 am 8:09 am

“This is an important issue for Congresswoman Bachmann. She’s a member of the House, the Foreign Intelligence Committee.”

How apropos, considering that intelligence is foreign to her………..

Posted by: Searambler | November 13, 2011, 8:18 am 8:18 am

What about Paul??? they didn’t explain why they didn’t give any time to Paul. Complete looser who are suckers for elites!

Posted by: lora | November 13, 2011, 8:18 am 8:18 am

Polls nor does the media select the next president – the people do. Equal time should have been allotted to each candidate regardless of perceived popularity.

Posted by: Fred Garvin | November 13, 2011, 8:22 am 8:22 am

Benton said” CBS News, in their arrogance, may think they can choose the next president. Fortunately, the people of Iowa, New Hampshire, and across America get to vote and not the media elites.””

LOL!!!!! Wow, how utterly clueless is THIS guy?!?!? Mr. Benton, this was ONE debate out of a couple DOZEN debates, and it was ONLY for Republicans trying to get the Party nomination to run in the real election. And I’ll bet the vast majority of the Republican audience who bothered to watch this circus already knows who they are going to support in the upcoming primaries. Holy crap, for these idiots to carp about their debate time is hilarious! (And FYI, Mr. Benton, those “media elites” each get a vote in the general election, just like you).

If THIS is the best we can expect from the Republicans, then President Obama will cruise to four more years with no problem………

Posted by: Searambler | November 13, 2011, 8:29 am 8:29 am

The moderator at these debates have rationed time for centuries. Bachmann is asked fewer questions because she stands NO chance for winning the GOP nomination and her response to these questions are calculated, predictable and boring.

Posted by: Guinness | November 13, 2011, 8:37 am 8:37 am

CBS showed a bias and disgraceful behavior with the debate and NOBODY can say different! I say boycot CBS and EVERY advertiser on CBS! america is no more and ALL the other countries are laughing at us! This is not a good day for america!

Posted by: BrklynMd3 | November 13, 2011, 8:42 am 8:42 am

Itz juss bizness.

CBS like NBC, ABC, and Fox have a lot of affiliate stations across the country. By shorting some candidates national airtime those candidates will just have to sink more bucks into ad buys at the local affiliate level early on to remain in the game. The national media know the party favorites Perry and Romney will be spreading da media buy loot. Gotta put the squeeze on the others upfront, and get what they can from the other candidates — before they fall by the wayside.

The same goes for print and radio media. Why do a great unbiased job impartially reporting on presidential candidates when they can do a slop-ass job and thereby squeeze more media buys out of the candidates.

Out of Bachman, Huntsman, Paul, and Santorum only Paul has and will continue to have campaign pockets deep enough to stay in the game to the end.

And in terms of playing the game, the Paul campaign is missing golden opportunity after golden opportunity, particularly after Jon Stewart handed them about $10 million dollars worth of great PR with Stewart’s comment that the media is treating Paul like the 13th floor of a hotel.

The day BEFORE each presidential debate Paul participated in the Paul campaign should have run a full-page ad in USA Today along the lines of, in this case:

“Watch tomorrow night as Scot Pelley and CBS treat Ron Paul as the 13th floor in a hotel for being such a threat to both the established democrat and republican parties.”

Jesse Benton, campaign manager for Paul, isn’t the sharpest pencil.All he’s doing is laying back and trying to counterpunch after the big media disses. So he comes across as nothing more than a big crybaby, even though he makes a good point.

Now if Benton the wuss had taken a glove off and slapped Pelley and CBS in the face the day BEFORE — like someone challenging them to a duel — with a USA Today ad predicting their short-shrift of Paul, NOW Benton could come across as someone with a justified grudge — and the cojones to get in the media’s face about it. BEFOREHAND!!!!!!

Suck it up Benton and grow a pair, you’re really disappointing us as Paul supporters. You’ve got to go guerilla, live off the land. And you can do such without being such pukes as Plouffe, Axelrod, and Dunn and in a manner that retains the respect of Dr. Paul

Posted by: dom youngross | November 13, 2011, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Doctor Paul received 89 seconds out of 90 minutes of air time. On what planet is this fair reporting? I really wish that the media would stop trying to pick candidates for America. It is the individuals job to choose their choice for President. It is the Media’s Job to give fair exposure to all candidates. I was at the devate in SC at Wofford College, if the media really wanted to tell the truth, they would have reported on the overwhelming support that Doctor Paul received outside the venue and inside the venue during commercial breaks. Several of our brave soldiers were there in the crowd showing their support for Doctor Paul. Lets tell the American People the truth about who is winning this race. Lets give up the antiquated polls that are a sampling of 300- 400 republican only voters who still have a landline. Seriously, who still has a landline phone these days? If you want to see who the American people truly support, go to the next debate and stand out front. You will be amazed….

Posted by: TheNewFourthEstate | November 13, 2011, 9:05 am 9:05 am

I registered republican to vote for Ron Paul, yes before the deadline.

it doesn’t matter if Ron Gets one min or ten minutes in a debate … EVERYTHING he says is the most sane, and logical approach, oh and he follows a thing called the LAW…. it was scary to watch all the rest of the repubs, practically drooling over more bombing and sanctions an killing and torture… what’s wrong with them, it saddens me that Paul has to be compared to these guys.

RON PAUL 2012

Posted by: NYGUY30 | November 13, 2011, 9:13 am 9:13 am

If candidates like Bachmann, Huntsman, Paul and Santorum wanted more time in a debate forum, why don’t they schedule a smaller debate much like the Gingrich-Cain debate? The debate should be 2 hours with the first hour being focused on the economy alone and the last hour a mix of social issues and foreign policy. The candidates would have 3 minutes to answer questions on the issues and they would be reaching key voting members in an important state like Iowa.

Posted by: BenEboy | November 13, 2011, 9:14 am 9:14 am

It is the individuals job to choose their choice for President. It is the Media’s Job to give fair exposure to all candidates. Posted by: TheNewFourthEstate | November 13, 2011, 9:05 am.

LOL! But all of these clowns aren’t candidates for the presidency. They all WANT to be THE candidate the Republicans send up against Obama. ONE person will become ‘The Great Right Hope’ and the rest will go back to screwing America in their own small, personal ways……………

Posted by: Searambler | November 13, 2011, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Do you want to know why Ron Paul never gets equal time. Just notice how the audience goes wild with applause every time he opens his mouth. Same reason they pull the polls that he wins after every debate.
The most hysterical thing about this is he can stand there and not open his mouth and win because the American people know whats coming out of the mouths of these other candidates means more of the same.

Posted by: Peggy Rose | November 13, 2011, 9:27 am 9:27 am

Michelle Bachmann is NOT the issue here. It is the media and how they can manipulate the public to believe what they want them to.

I’ve heard claims that the media controls who gets elected in this country. This is proof that certainly is the case.

I will NEVER watch cbs news ever again

Posted by: angie | November 13, 2011, 9:28 am 9:28 am

If Ron Paul is raising a lot of money and being heard, then CBS and their media cronies can’t keep their system of printing money, entitlements, and perpetual war. Makes perfect sense why they censor Ron Paul because he is threat to what they hold so dear.

Posted by: CD | November 13, 2011, 9:31 am 9:31 am

I wouldn’t waste one second listening to anything teavangelical right-wing repub candidates said, no matter the venue…every single time they open their mouths they lie, pander to an elitist crowd, say the most outrageous things, and propose issues that will destroy this country and/or expand our role as military police of the world community. These people are dangerous, especially those who are in lock-step with the New Apostolic Reformation group…do a little research about this group, their plans for dominionism of the world and theocracy of the US, and realize that all teavangelicals/repubs are hell bent on creating two classes…the wealthy and/or authoritarian Christian leaders of a predominately Christian nation, and those who exist at poverty level and live to serve their masters. There are long-range plans that these folks want to put in place to rule with iron fists and to make Christian doctrine/government trump the Constitution and, as slime-ball perry stated, making government inconsequential…watch out for the koch brothers, the New Apostolic Reformation, candidates that want to destroy programs that provide for those in need, for the education of our children, vital infrastructure projects, health care for all citizens, security for our borders without sending our young men and women to fight useless wars, etc. OBAMA 11/4/2012!

Posted by: snydergal | November 13, 2011, 9:33 am 9:33 am

If you’ve heard one fundamentalist speak you’ve heard them all as they simply repeat the same BS. If we had a week without some conservative screeching about “liberal press” I think I’d be shocked. Of course if you read these links you see this tactic seems to work.

Posted by: lexingtonlady | November 13, 2011, 9:43 am 9:43 am

An email from a CBS producer who predicted that Bachmann would not receive many questions from moderators Scott Pelley and Major Garrett.
The email is not a “supposed smoking gun” It proves that CBS intended their anti-Bachmann bias to do what they in fact did: ask Bachmann fewer (60%) questions than asked of Romney and Gingrich.

“An email from a CBS producer who predicted that Bachmann would not receive many questions from moderators Scott Pelley and Major Garrett.”
The email is not a “supposed smoking gun” It proves that CBS intended their anti-Bachmann bias to do what they in fact did: ask Bachmann fewer (60%) questions than asked of Romney and Gingrich.
A recent SmartPolitics analysis found that former Massachusetts governor and front-runner for the nomination Mitt Romney has spoken for over 73 minutes in the last 5 debates, more than any other candidate. Texas Governor Rick Perry came in second in terms of speaking time at 54 minutes, followed by Bachmann at 41.

Posted by: Derek Wain | November 13, 2011, 9:54 am 9:54 am

Ron Paul was ahead by a wide margin when CBS Executives PULLED THE POLL!
CBS DEBATE POLL VOTES:
1st: Paul – 27,270 ●
2nd: Perry – 18,977 ●
3rd: Huntsman – 13,164 ●
4th: Newt – 13,107 ●
BEFORE the GOP Debate had ended the
Numbers were captured on Video:
Search YOUTUBE: :
Ron Paul 2012 – Wins Again – Nov 12th 2011 CBS Debate (MUST SEE) Corrupt Media Proof!!!

Posted by: AmericanWoman | November 13, 2011, 10:00 am 10:00 am

CBS and the mass media think that they can choose our next [resident and it’s a joke. We don’t need them anymore, we are united as one and on the path back to save this country. They can ignore the good doctor all they want, but he is the true front runner and will be our next president.

RON PAUL 2012 rEVOLution

Posted by: WakeUpMyBrothersandSisters | November 13, 2011, 10:01 am 10:01 am

This is so scary how far the media will go in covering up the truth. Ron Paul was censored, plain and simple, we are just as bad as China or Russia if the media acts this way. Even the CBS after debate poll was taken down when Ron Paul was winning it by thousands of votes above the runner up. I am very worried for America. This might be the last election I participate in, after I vote for Ron Paul because there is no future if elections are fixed by the media.

Posted by: Olivier | November 13, 2011, 10:03 am 10:03 am

The most hysterical thing about this is he (Ron Paul) can stand there and not open his mouth and win because the American people know whats coming out of the mouths of these other candidates means more of the same.
Posted by: Peggy Rose | November 13, 2011, 9:27 am.

LOL! This is Ron Paul’s THIRD presidential campaign. (If we as a nation truly wanted him, we would have already had him). He has a very, very small but very, very vocal core group of supporters. Who believe he is the next coming of Jesus. The truth is, Ron Paul will never be president of the United States. Never. That is an absolute fact that I will stake my life on. Fortunately this will be his last go-around, since he will never get the nomination for this election, and he will be 80 years old by the time the next presidential election rolls around. You are right about one thing, though. The OTHER candidates all stink. Which is why we WILL have four more years under Obama…………

Posted by: Searambler | November 13, 2011, 10:03 am 10:03 am

CBS is a disgrace…

Posted by: Freedom | November 13, 2011, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Not one Ron Paul supporter will vote for anyone but Ron Paul, we will write him in on the ballot. We will not vote for the lesser of two evils, because it is still a vote for evil. The GOP cannot win without us, they are going to have to back us if they want to beat Obama.

Posted by: Mike Kelley | November 13, 2011, 10:07 am 10:07 am

FOX thinks they can demonize and lie about a democrat President and it’s a joke.

Posted by: lexingtonlady | November 13, 2011, 10:11 am 10:11 am

“The Bachmann campaign went so far as to release an email that they said spokeswoman Alice Stewart had “inadvertently received” from CBS earlier in the day….“I inadvertently received an email where CBS made it clear that Michele was going to receive fewer questions than the other candidates. Clearly this is a problem,” Stewart said.”

LOL! Yeah, sure, this spokeswoman just HAPPENED to INADVERTENTLY receive a damning email about HER candidate, against CBS, from CBS. Sure. And she received this “smoking gun” BEFORE the event, and did what about it? Did she confront CBS? Did she confront Pelley, the moderator? Did she threaten to call a press conference before the event to blast the event sponsor for this supposed email? Did she threaten to pull Bachmann out of the event unless they guaranteed equal time for everyone? If she really found out BEFORE the event that her candidate was going to get short-changed, and she really did nothing about it whatsoever, then she should be fired for gross incompetence. Unless she is lying about the email. Lying about receiving it, or lying about who really sent it……………

Posted by: Searambler | November 13, 2011, 10:13 am 10:13 am

The arrogance of liberals comes through loud and clear both in the behavior of Pelley and in the posts by liberals on this thread.

ANY of the Republican candidates would be SO MUCH better than the current FAILED president.

Posted by: Avanti | November 13, 2011, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Well Avanti – If by “arrogant” you mean we tend to examine facts then guilty as charged. P.S. Michelle lies out of her rear end.

Posted by: lexingtonlady | November 13, 2011, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Only one candidate came out against the endless wars, war with Iran, and torture. CBS showed which side it is on.

The choice is simple; more wars,torture, and national bankruptcy or Ron Paul.

Posted by: olafub | November 13, 2011, 10:29 am 10:29 am

CBS gave Ron Paul only 90 seconds of air time in the debate. Ron Paul has double digits in the polls (comes in third in most), Ron Paul has raised the third most money; Ron Paul receives more donations from active duty military than all the other Republican candidates combined and Obama individually. Ron Paul has a national campaign organization. The Media is trying to manipulate the outcome of the Republican Primary it is obvious. Newt wasn’t crying out for the audit of the Federal Reserve when he was Speaker of the House. Especially when Republican candidates who don’t even get 1% in the polls and can’t raise money to run for President are given more time and treated like top tier candidates. Ron Paul represents a change beyond what all the other Republicans offer and Obama.

There are no real differences between the rest of Republican candidates and Obama; They only argue about: How much we WILL be TAXED; What they WILL SPEND money on; How much money we WILL give to foreign nations; How fast we WILL create MORE government and HOW and WHERE we WILL POLICE the world and FIGHT MORE WARS in order to KILL more of our men and women in uniform.

Ron Paul argues should we do these things and his answer is NO. Stop the status quo and the media/government from deciding who wins and loses…Vote Ron Paul for President in 2012 so we all get a shot at winning.

Posted by: David Ryon | November 13, 2011, 10:41 am 10:41 am

I served in the US Army for over 23 years and I believe what CBS did last night was disgraceful. What am I going to do about it? I will not be watching CBS period. That’s right, I will refuse to watch any show on CBS in the future. Now that is how I choose to flex my muscles CBS.

I want to thank the writer for bringing this to the public’s attention.

Vote for Ron Paul Please!

Posted by: Dave Infinger | November 13, 2011, 10:49 am 10:49 am

LOL! I can’t help but laugh at the people who claim they will boycott CBS and/or their sponsors over this debate. Because we all know they are lying through their teeth. As soon as a NASCAR event or a football game or some stupid reality show garbage comes on that they want to watch, their “boycott” will go right out the window. And their sponsors like Budweiser sure as hell won’t see any drop in business from these people, either…………

Posted by: Searambler | November 13, 2011, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Ron Paul , or any of these conservative goof balls would be a(nother) disaster for the American people . Haven’t we already seen what conservatives do ? They are just loony all of them , but some are worse than others . Ron Paul is a real whacko extreme just like Bachmann , the people who support him are simpletons who obviously do not understand the political and economic realities of the 21st century . Ron Paul’s idea of foreign policy is for the USA to curl up and ignore anything that doesn’t directly affect the USA , becoming an even more xenophobic isolationist nationalist right wing bastion of illiteracy and conservative cheap skate scam -loving ideology . Yeah that’s what the USA needs alright ….not. The right wingers will try to elect a whacko for president , because that is all they have , i.e. bat sh!t crazy nominees , and will fail .

Posted by: Davem | November 13, 2011, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Ron Paul , or any of these conservative goof balls would be a(nother) disaster for the American people . Haven’t we already seen what conservatives do ? They are just loony all of them , but some are worse than others . Ron Paul is a real whacko extreme just like Bachmann , the people who support him are simpletons , who obviously do not understand the political and economic realities of the 21st century . Ron Paul’s idea of foreign policy is for the USA to curl up and ignore anything that doesn’t directly affect the USA , becoming an even more xenophobic isolationist nationalist right wing bastion of illiteracy and conservative cheap skate scam -loving ideology . Yeah that’s what the USA needs alright ….not. The right wingers will try to elect a whacko for president , because that is all they have , i.e. bat sh!t crazy nominees , and will fail .

Posted by: Davem | November 13, 2011, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Just like little kindergarteners arguing over who got / gets the last / biggest cookie . What a bunch of whiny petulant losers , although they do exemplify conservative politicians to a tee. They’re all alike , whine / lie / repeat ad infinitum ad nauseum , just old Cryin’ and Lyin’ John Boehner.

Posted by: Freddie James | November 13, 2011, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Huntsman might have had a chance to win , but he is way too moderate and sensible for the loons on the right to accept. Obama 2012 !! Thank you Ron Paul ! You da man !! *snicker*

Posted by: billytimandbob | November 13, 2011, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Imma go get a case of beer and some chips , flip on FOX and be a REAL American ! Wooohoooo ! Idiots unite ! Ron Paul for D.C. dogcatcher and Michelle Bachmann for FFA / TSA body cavity search director !!

Posted by: alpha_lib | November 13, 2011, 11:25 am 11:25 am

I could NOT BELIEVE the absurd manner in which the debate was run – Were the ppl at CBS drunk or just stupid — OR BOTH???!!! No more CBS – which is why I’m on ABC talkin’ ’bout how CBS sucks. No more clicks for YOU, CBS.

Posted by: Talking Deads | November 13, 2011, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Keep it up, Mr. Pelley, and all you other jour-no-lists. Every time the American public sees how snotty and biased you are, more people wake up to your scam of pushing the liberal agenda every chance you get and in every way you can.

Any one of the Republican candidates would be so much better than Obama, because each one of them has infinitely more respect for the Constitution and also knows that you can’t keep spending more than you take in – something that baffles the oh-so-smart Obama and the Democrats.

Posted by: Not Chicken Little | November 13, 2011, 11:46 am 11:46 am

CBS is owned by Westinghouse,
General Electric and Westinghouse, the two largest military weapons manufacturers, own much of the U.S. media. GE owns the whole NBC network. Westinghouse owns CBS. It is no accident that these giant weapons contractors use the news media as the public relations arm for their primary product – war and the weapons of war…
IT IS NO ACCIDENT THAT PAUL WAS BLACKED OUT BY THIS WARMONGERING COOPERATION. Wake up american and stop drinking the koolaid.

Posted by: Doug Chestnut | November 13, 2011, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

This bias is why I contributed to a campaign for the first time in my life. Ron Paul’s.

Posted by: Dean Norby | November 13, 2011, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

I think Gov Huntsman was being sarcastic in his statement.And being a journalist or an executive of a news station/program,if you do not recognize sarcasm,you are unfit for the position….YOU’RE FIRED!!!!

Posted by: Dale | November 13, 2011, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

It was disgraceful. CBS should be ashamed.

Posted by: Lisa | November 13, 2011, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

ron paul had the only disagreement on foreign policy, obama is slow and reluctant to do anything on foreign policy front unless support base rocked, yet it’s funny seeing liberals the brain equivalent of 16 year olds to not grasp the dire situation of needing ron paul to represent the only honest talk on foreign policy front.

whether you agree with him or not, he provides a -honest-, much needed discourse, otherwise generals and private contractors will be running amok just like domestic waste and fraud on government programs. he was allocated 89 seconds of speaking time, and on this matter of national survival as we’re near bankruptcy and war spent 4 trillion dollars over the last decade, with your wide pool of verbosity, you come up with the term ‘complaining’, ‘whining’. you consider yourself fitting for national dialogue? give me a ridiculous break.

Posted by: jt | November 13, 2011, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Why do we have snarky biased members of the lame stream media asking questions? Why not get some intelligent, knowledgeable people in the field to ask questions. For foreign affainrs, How about John Bolton and Condeleeza Rice. I don’t see why we need the media drones, filled with their self importance to do anything.

Posted by: Dennis Sinclair | November 13, 2011, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

It’s not their decision who the candidate is. That’s our decision. I don’t know why we let the networks run the debates anyway, they are just Democrat lackeys.

Posted by: P Tom Webster | November 13, 2011, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Perry – 5 questions, 2 follow ups
Newt – 5 questions, 1 follow up
Cain – 5 questions, 1 follow up
Romney – 4 questions, 1 follow up
Santorum – 3 questions, 2 follow ups
Bachman – 3 questions
Huntsman – 2 questions, 1 follow up
Paul – 1 question, 1 follow up

Posted by: Mark | November 13, 2011, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

This collection of clueless teabaggers were looking for the softball questions that they usually get from Faux news, didn’t happen

Posted by: neastsider | November 13, 2011, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

What an awful debate and a terrible “news” organization. Not only did they short Dr. Paul on time…CBS also took down the debate “poll” that showed Ron Paul winning by a substantial margin. Talk about sore losers! CBS and CNBC take the cake! We’ll see if ABC can do any better December 10th.

Posted by: Marriner Eccles | November 13, 2011, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

I am a military veteran and it is appalling to me that they would insult veterans in this way on Veteran’s Day weekend. Ron Paul was the only veteran on that stage and he gets more military/veteran support than all of the other GOP candidates combined. One would think that this would be reason enough to give him some time to speak his mind on the issues that affect military folks the most– Foreign Policy. Instead, they gave the warmongers all the time in the world to discuss how they would move the pawns on the global chessboard.

Ron Paul consistently polls 3rd in land-line polls, consistently comes first in online polls, comes in either 1st or 2nd in straw polls, and has the most dispersed donation mapping of any candidate in the race. These are not the attributes of a candidate that has “no chance”, they are attributes of a candidate whose greatest support comes from the People.

Posted by: Joseph | November 13, 2011, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Pelley was so arrogant, so smugly stupid, that he was an embarrassment to the entire media. Since when did he come a candidate? If he wanted to be part of the debate, he should have excused himself as a moderator.

Posted by: pat | November 13, 2011, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

MSM says “some candidates poll low so they dont get as much time”. Perhaps they poll low because they are not being given EQUAL time. Whats so hard about a debate? Pick the top 5-8 questions and allow each candidate time to answer the question. No wonder so many people are waking up to whats really going on – Selected, not elected.

Posted by: Ron | November 13, 2011, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Posted by: keredte
WE WILL NOT HAVE A SITTING DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT IN JANUARY OF 2013!

keredte you are so right there won’t be a sitting democratic president in January 2012 but a standing democratic president being re-sworn in for another 4yrs !!!!

Posted by: myopinionpal | November 13, 2011, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

CBS aired the worse debate ever. the moderators stunk. the network outright lied about the length of time this debate would be. they cut the last 30 minutes in lieu of a NCIS RERUN!!! and told viewers it would be streamed. the stream was frozen and useless. then the promised it would air on face the nation the next day…another lie

I hardly ever would watch face the nation but did tune in. NO DEBATE was aired!!!!!!!!
CBS..shame on you!!! Guess what? I will tune in to pbs and any other network other than CBS!!

Posted by: sid nichols | November 13, 2011, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

The mainstream media is so inept that they can’t even realize that letting Paul speak would create a hearty debate, thus a more interesting hour of television. I guess they’re too busy trying to help the establishment hand-picked ‘front-runners’ speak. It’s amazing we live in a day that the presidential race has only one peace candidate. Ron Paul deserves to be heard.

Posted by: Scott | November 13, 2011, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Posted by: keredte
WE WILL NOT HAVE A SITTING DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT IN JANUARY OF 2013!

keredte you are so right there won’t be a sitting democratic president in January 2012 but a standing democratic president being re-sworn in for another 4yrs !!!!

Posted by: myopinionpal
________________________
I wouldn’t be too sure about that myopinionpal. There is only one way your hero is going to win in 2012 and that is if the unemployment rate dips below 9% and now that he has decided to block construction of the Canadian oil pipeline to appease the global warming activists, the unemployment rate will probably stay at 9%.

Your “standing” Democrat might be “standing” alone when the Republican nominee is sworn in.

Posted by: ivan | November 13, 2011, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Hey Pelley, you idiot!! When Huntsman was thanking you about giving him enough time and footage during the debate, maybe he was being SARCASTIC!!! But maybe you didn’t get that because you have the emotional intelligence of a 2-year old!!

The way this debate was conducted was DISGUSTING…

Posted by: KuMotif | November 13, 2011, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

That was a travesty of a debate. Ron Paul is the greatest hope in modern American history. I am convinced that Ron Paul has already won the hearts and minds of We the People, who believe he is the only one that we can trust. Ron Paul is against the bailouts. He was against the Iraq war from the beginning, and if we had listened to him way back then, we would have killed bin Laden a lot quicker and got it over with. Ron Paul predicted the housing bubble collapse. Ron Paul is the singular force behind the movement to audit the Federal Reserve.

I am also convinced that the more people willingly listen to Ron Paul talk for an hour on various topics from the heart, unscripted and without a teleprompter, they would come to understand that he’s actually the most moderate candidate running in either party, and that everybody else is on the lunatic fringe. God bless Ron Paul. If he succeeds despite the blackout and becomes the 45th President of the United States, it will be one of the greatest achievements in human history and the beginning of a new American century of freedom, peace and prosperity for all.

Posted by: Dan | November 13, 2011, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

CBS hasn’t heard the last of it from the Ron Paul people.
Last week they trashed all of Bill O’Reilly’s books on Amazon & more, after he censored them from his poll (that he won).
A local news radio host in Reno Nevada was let go this week after he trashed Ron Paul.

Watch out CBS, you are in the Ron Paul crosshairs. Thousands are people are out for you & your sponsors. We will not buy anything from any of them & we’ll write letters!

Posted by: cynthia kennedy | November 13, 2011, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

ALL CANDIDATES SHOULD HAVE EQUAL TIME IN NATIONAL DEBATES AND NEWS COVERAGE.

The media has no business in picking winners and losers. That is for the American People to do. It is horribly presumptive of stations like CBS to give favor to the SUPPOSED front runners when there have been no elections yet.

Main Stream Media is showing it’s true colors. These major news outlets are puppets for the ruling elites that want to manufacture our consent.

Posted by: Dana | November 13, 2011, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

The smirk on Scott Pelley’s face when he asked Romney the question about killing Americn traitors overseas during wartime was disgusting yet instructive. To call Scott Pelley sophomoric would be to insult sophomores everywhere.

This smirk showed me that Pelley has a personal agenda. From now on, I’m taking that into account. and will double-check anything I hear from Scott Pelley, if I listen to him at all.

Posted by: Mike | November 13, 2011, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Bachman obviously is only comfortable with interviewers like Limbaugh and Hannity; people who are biased in favor of any GOP candidate. Their interviewing is truly disgraceful and is never informative. The GOP candidates respond only with talking points and resent being challenged to actually answer a question. None of them stand a chance in a debate with Barack Obama, not even Newt and especially Cain, Perry or Bachman.

Posted by: cloteasboy | November 13, 2011, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Ron Paul people: don’t miss the comment to this article by BrklynMd3 | November 13, 2011, 8:42 am

This person outlines an excellent strategy for RP! Now, go do it!

Posted by: Sean McCaan | November 13, 2011, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Ron Paul marches on towards the White House. No media can stop us.

Posted by: Seamus | November 13, 2011, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

CBS is bias and unethical. No matter how a candidate is polling, as long as that candidate is participating in a publicly sanctioned debate, there should always be equal time. CBS should be heavily fined and if not payed should be barred from holding further debates.

Posted by: Mary | November 13, 2011, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Who cares about Bachman, but Ron Paul’s results in the polls deserves more than 5 minutes (less than that aired). Anyone that the lying media is this afraid of is probably worth checking out.

Posted by: Mandy | November 13, 2011, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

The CBS poll is back up with RON PAUL winning. As Ron Paul has often said, “An idea whose time has come will not be stopped by any government or any army [media or otherwise].” Ron Paul’s supporters are legion. We shall overcome. Ron Paul WILL be our President. Nothing can stop this.

Posted by: bja | November 13, 2011, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Last week before this debate I heard Ron Paul state when he watches news he watches ABC. From now on I will as well. Thanks for posting this.

Posted by: Gary Wolfer | November 13, 2011, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

America is supposed to be about fair play. If you’re candidate is being gagged by the press, it’s hardly “whining” to point it out. That attitude is typical of the win at all costs, cheat if you have to, the end justifies the means that typifies the decline of this nation. Sadly, these comments are coming from those that claim to want to return America to the ideals that made this country great. That’s an obvious fallacy in logic. Tyranny begins by repressing those that have different ideas. We are well advanced on that road. For all those that angrily exclaim that it’s OK for the press to do this because it advances your cause, I say to you:. careful what you ask for. The next time when the wheel turns it might be you that is muzzled.

Posted by: Terry McBride | November 13, 2011, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Wow, CBS is little more than bucket of puke if this is how they treat ron paul. Glad I know what you are all about.

Posted by: aaron carmody | November 13, 2011, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

The facts are simple. There is only so much time alloted for the debate. Bachman and Paul are at the bottom of the pack with very little suppor from their own party. They have little chance of winning. Do we really need to waste time listining to their tired old song and dance? I (and I suspect most of the voters) would rahter hear from the top canidates who actaully have a chance of obtaining the nomination. It has nothing do to with the liberal media. It has to everything to do with reality—-someithing Michelle and Ron are either unable or unwilling to understand.

Michelle and Ron are washed up and simply need to grow up and face the fact that the vast majority of the party is not in support of their extreme agenda. If they can’t get the party to support them they have zero change of winning in a general election.

Posted by: DennisBTR | November 13, 2011, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

I really wish people would: 1) layoff the name calling and insults. How about showing some respect, keeping an open mind and winning arguments by making a case for your point of view? And 2) stop calling Ron Paul a racist and a right wing extremist. Do some research about the man and you will find out how wrong that is. Paul is firmly planted in the libertarian wing of the GOP. Find out about the liberty movement. At first blush Paul’s ideas can easily be misunderstood, but this is not a man who advocates discrimination or religious/political extremism of ANY kind.

Re: the whole “whining” discussion. Personally, I would like to see the candidates in forums where they all get more time to give in-depth answers and to really explain their positions. Longer answer times show you who is capable of thoughtful analysis (as opposed to the parrots and the used car salesmen).

The left and the right both need to wake up. We have professional politicians, lobbyists, and special interests driving our nation into the ground. Our current president is one of them. Both parties are advocating statism; the only differences are the forms and the arguments as to why things should be this way. We must stop fighting culture wars; we cannot legislate morality (left or right).

Find common ground America or we’re doomed.

Posted by: LiveFree1776 | November 13, 2011, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

CBS disgraced itself at the Republican presidential debates last night , following a pattern set by Fox, MSNBC,and CNN. This is ABC’s chance to shine as a genuine news service rather than a bunch of party hacks. Why not try an honest hour and see how your viewers react.

Posted by: Jeffry A. Geyer | November 13, 2011, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Shame on CBS!! They are blatantly pushing candidates on us like some fast food commercial oriented toward kids. THIS IS AMERICA’S ELECTION, yet they treat it like it’s just one of their game shows. We’re sick of having candidates pushed on us. CBS shouldn’t be in the business of promoting one candidate over the other, this fake debate was a complete waste of time.

It’s clear that CBS is giving biased attention to anyone who can mouth a “politically correct” response. And, it’s just as clear when a candidate speaks the hard truth, with wisdom rather than the typical fear-mongering, and demonstrates rational thought.

CBS’ interfererence with our country’s election process is UN-AMERICAN!! Obviously if we Americans want to decide on a candidate, we will not be able to inform ourselves by watching CBS’ biased coverage.

Posted by: TC1776 | November 14, 2011, 4:58 am 4:58 am

More biased media-controlled debates? No surprise here. As long as WE THE PEOPLE allow this to continue it will. Already the political structure is made easily decided by those with $$$ and power rather than the citizens of this country. As for all the “Ron Paul will never win…” you all need to pull your head out of your asses before you suffocate because you sound like nothing more than brainwashed idiots. Deal with that.

Posted by: Jason | November 14, 2011, 9:44 am 9:44 am

So what else is new. The so-called main stream media was the spokesman of Sen.Obama, without them he probably would have never been elected. Thank you for unbiased and investigated reporting, that went out the window a long time ago.

Posted by: Lizzie | November 14, 2011, 11:19 am 11:19 am

I have watched all the debates because they’ve been very amusing. The very people that are NOT given much attention (because they can NEVER win) are the very people that make me question where these folks are that would WANT such a pile of CLOWNS to actually run our Nation. Paying less attention to these people only gives those real, serious and BRIGHT contenders a chance to SHOW this nation what if any qualities they have to be our Leader. Please, keep WASTING time on these ‘funny people’ so that we’ll all be very pleased when the GOP actually picks a “decent” candidate to run. By contrast we’ll THINK we’re getting the ‘brightest of the bright’!!!

Posted by: demNme5 | November 14, 2011, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Fox News itself is cynical, but Fox News VIEWERS who worry about media having a liberal bias can now see that it has an ESTABLISHMENT BIAS.

Ron Paul’s views are truly radical, and, rather than argue against him, the Establishment Media (which is corporate ad funded — whether “mainstream” or right-wing nutland at Fox) “silence” Ron Paul.

This is “hegemonic discourse” at its finest. (Though Noam Chomksy is thought to be leftwing, his analysis of how the establishment marginalizes and silences dissent applies to Ron Paul perfectly.)

Hegemonic discourse — there is only one right way to talk and all others are silenced.

The war machine opposes Ron Paul, and ALL of our media is corporate funded and therefore corporate-controlled.

Posted by: Brett Jameson | November 14, 2011, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

I’d like to ask the networks, such as CBS, how well in advance of the debates do they decide which candidates they’ll screw.

Posted by: stephen knight | November 14, 2011, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Major Garrett just did an interview on NBC bragging on the depth that was revealed unto them by all of the candidates, what total bull corn indeed. Ron Paul 2012

Posted by: Derik D | November 14, 2011, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

This is all about the agenda of mainstream media, which is neo-conservative/neo-liberal. Ron Paul is libertarian in ideology; Jon Huntsman is relatively centrist. That’s why they get virtually no questions compared to the others, who are all neo-conservatives (authoritarian/statist), not conservative. Obama is a pin-stiped neo-liberal and thus owned by the same ideologically-authoritarian cabal as well. Social issues are the bone they toss the electorate to pretend we have a democracy. Follow the money. The game is rigged. It’s now all about crony capitalism and imperialism. Mainstream media are owned by the cabal, just as the whopping majority of our “representatives”. We’ll continue to get fleeced by corporate welfare, the military industrial complex, and Israeli-interests. Be upset, but direct the attention to where it belongs — the big government/corporatist cabal and their neo-con/neo-liberal puppets, NOT genuine liberals, conservatives, or libertarians. I love that line by true conservative Pat Buchanan about both major parties now: They “represent two wings on the same bird of prey.” I would call the mouth of that bird “mainstream media”.

Posted by: stephen knight | November 14, 2011, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.