Nov 14, 2011 12:57am

Obama Says GOP Candidates Are Wrong, Waterboarding is ‘Torture’

ABC News’ Mary Bruce and Jon Garcia Report:

President Obama said today that Republican presidential candidates are “wrong” to defend the practice of waterboarding, which he said is torture.

“Waterboarding is torture. It’s contrary to America’s traditions, it’s contrary to our ideals, it’s not who we are, it’s not how we operate,” Obama told reporters at a press conference of the interrogation technique.

Republican Presidential candidates Michele Bachmann and Herman Cain said in a debate Saturday night that they would support the renewed use of waterboarding.

“They’re wrong,” Obama said today. “We did the right thing by ending that practice.”

The enhanced interrogation technique simulates the sensation of drowning and was used by U.S. personnel in an effort to force cooperation of detainees.

“We don’t need it in order to prosecute the war on terrorism,” Obama explained. “If we want to lead around the world part of our leadership is setting a good example. And anybody who has actually read about and understands the practice of waterboarding would say that that is torture and that’s not something we do. Period.”

Although he was willing to respond to Bachmann and Cain, Obama declined to comment on front-runner Mitt Romney’s attack on the president’s foreign policy in Iran.

“I am going to make a practice of not commenting on whatever is said in Republican debates until they’ve got an actual nominee,” he said.

SHOWS:

User Comments

I don’t understand why any of these republican candidates would keep talking about waterboarding as acceptable. They are all over the place on issues and this is one they should know is torture.

Posted by: Vicki | November 14, 2011, 1:15 am 1:15 am

Obama caught Osama in 3 years of his presidency something Bush and his morons coudn’t do in how many years? well if you can do the math then you know who is right on about this issue

Posted by: Hussein | November 14, 2011, 2:33 am 2:33 am

Hussein | November 14, 2011, 2:33 am——- Well if Obama says they’re wrong, the annointed one has spoken! LOL You are clueless in matters of the military. Obama changed no practices as to how we go after Osama and it was only a matter of time before he was caught or killed. It’s not like Obama ran over there and shot him. Obama has watched us slip into a near double dip recession in his 3 years with nobody to blame but his policies. Maybe you should do the math on that!

Posted by: commonsenseparty | November 14, 2011, 3:02 am 3:02 am

commonsenseparty | November 14, 2011, 3:02 am 3:02 am : First you are wrong about how Osama was caught/killed it wasn’t a matter of time but it was rather a strategical approach & investigation that took an entire year. I don’t think you need any explaination about how the Bush-Cheney administration over spent as well..

Posted by: Hussein | November 14, 2011, 5:37 am 5:37 am

What does Obama call his form of justice with Bin Laden and a bullet through his forehead or all the hundreds of people he has blown to pieces with Predator Drone missiles?

Thanks, but I think I’d prefer having a little water splashed in my face.

Posted by: panola | November 14, 2011, 6:38 am 6:38 am

The boundaries that protect the innocence of the people become questioned when torturous measures are used to gain something that is not other wised premised, while the objective sought may be of equal value to the majority vote such factors of how this goal is reached. Are the elements received any more truthful when theories are tested at sake of others.

Posted by: Kenneth | November 14, 2011, 6:42 am 6:42 am

Panola, are you saying that the our soldiers apprehending Bin Laden didn’t have the right to defend themselves? Just as police can use deadly force when they are being shot at, our soldiers should have the same right, no matter how infamous the target to apprehend. It is easy for you to make such a judgement if you have never been shot at in the line of duty and have had to make a split-second decision while your life hangs in the balance.
Same with the predator drone missiles. Would it be better for our soldiers to get shot at than to use the drones for dangerous missions such as capturing terrorists? Either way innocent people will be killed but at least by using the drones our soldiers aren’t taking bullets.

Posted by: Librarian53 | November 14, 2011, 7:29 am 7:29 am

Yeah – Waterboarding terrorists is bad, but violently
Killing American babies up to nine months in the
Womb is okay! ? !What would Lincoln do ?
Until we stop allowing massacring innocent
Children , there is NO room to pretend we are:
“civil” / “Civilized”. Abortion is the worst savagery …
For what ? A romp in the hay ? That’s beyond
Repulsive . Obama is such a fake … He denies comfort
Rooms to infants born alive after abortions, but
Then pretends he has a conscience …

The story is on you tube — he is pro- terrorist but
Anti-deafen less babies.

That’s psychotic… But he’s the king of lies , so
What does anybody really expect ?

PS: Ask yourself: what was the purpose of denying comfort rooms
To infants who are going to die anyway. He was the only one to vote against
It… He didn’t want to “punish” the staff “with a baby” I guess. The man
Is the strangest being to come along EVER . Anyone who can see any
Good in him, please inform the rest of us. Heaven help US !

Posted by: Schizo-guy | November 14, 2011, 7:48 am 7:48 am

Anyone who can see any Good in him, please inform the rest
of us. Heaven help US !POSTED BY: SCHIZO-GUY**********
****There is more evil in the idiotic comparison analogy. Crawl
back in the hole.

Posted by: michael | November 14, 2011, 8:05 am 8:05 am

“”"”"”"”I don’t think you need any explaination about how the Bush-Cheney administration over spent as well..”"”"”"”"

Posted by: Hussein | November 14, 2011, 5:37 am

That’s your defense? Bush did it so Obama can too? I didn’t vote for Bush because of his handling of the wars and the spending. Now, Obama is on track to spend the same in half the time. You might be OK with that, I am not. Instead, he wastes his time on what candidates say about waterboarding? How about we FINALLY focus on the economy for a change after 3 years of waiting and a ridiculous Obamacare law that clearly is not deficit neutral? Obama, Pelosi and Reid should not have another chance in a leadership position. Don’t take my word for it, just look at the numbers from the time Pelosi started as speaker until her reign ended. Those numbers will melt your face!

Posted by: commonsenseparty | November 14, 2011, 8:07 am 8:07 am

Its OK prez….just let them talk…..LOL LOL….makes for an EASY win. The more they talk the more I laugh. They have a circus full of clowns and its quite hilarious. Not sure who’s the bigger Idiot out of the group but LOL LOL LOL they sure are gonna make it easy !! Maybe they SHOULD have kept Palin around….LOL LOL LOL LOL

Posted by: PP | November 14, 2011, 8:08 am 8:08 am

As far as my opinion on Waterboarding – I see it
As torture … Is it Un-American ? Is it a necessary
Means to an end ? Should it be used routinely or
Just as a last resort ? To me, because war is war, I
Think there are a lot of “grey areas”, but “enhanced
Interrogation technique ” just sounds like a metaphor
For torture … Let’s talk about those less fortunate than
The terrorist – lets talk about the rights of our own
Defenseless American citizens In the womb ( they have feelings/nervous systems too)
And are alive when brutalized and unceremoniously
Murdered on demand.

Yeah – Waterboarding terrorists is bad, but violently
Killing American babies up to nine months in the
Womb is okay! ? !What would Lincoln do ?
Until we stop allowing massacring innocent
Children , there is NO room to pretend we are:
“civil” / “Civilized”. Abortion is the worst savagery …
For what ? A romp in the hay ? That’s beyond
Repulsive . Obama is such a fake … He denies comfort
Rooms to infants born alive after abortions, but
Then pretends he has a conscience …

The story is on you tube — he is pro- terrorist but
Anti-deafen less babies.

That’s psychotic… But he’s the king of lies , so
What does anybody really expect ?

PS: Ask yourself: what was the purpose of denying comfort rooms
To infants who are going to die anyway. He was the only one to vote against
It… He didn’t want to “punish” the staff “with a baby” I guess. The man
Is the strangest being to come along EVER . Anyone who can see any
Good in him, please inform the rest of us. Heaven help US !

Posted by: Tell it To The Babies | November 14, 2011, 8:29 am 8:29 am

And let’s all just pretend that intelligence which was obtained thru enhanced interrogation was not used to find and kill bin laden….

Posted by: Logicsgood5 | November 14, 2011, 8:35 am 8:35 am

Someone care to explain difference between waterboarding vs drones or Seal snipers?

Posted by: bluemount | November 14, 2011, 8:38 am 8:38 am

That’s easy Bluemount – the drones and Seals are deadly!

Posted by: Logicsgood5 | November 14, 2011, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Maybee Mr. Cain will submit to a waterboard session to answer questions abou the women in his life.

Posted by: Harry | November 14, 2011, 8:47 am 8:47 am

Until GW and Friends redefined water boarding as “OK” and not torture, it WAS considered torture here in the USA. As recently as the late 1980′s we actually prosecuted people for using that technique. (A Sheriff and his deputies were using it in Texas on prisoners and were convicted of torturing them. They spent time in prison for it, courtesy of the Ronald Reagan Department of Justice). The rest of the civilized world still considers it torture. For these morons to come out and defend water boarding as an acceptable thing proves one thing: they are willing to take any position in order to pander to the core Republicans that will choose one of them to run for president. That core sees nothing wrong with torturing our enemies to get them to talk. Never mind that intel garnered through torture is notoriously unreliable (just ask John McCain, who, when tortured in Vietnam, ‘gave up’ the names of the Pittsburgh Steelers). Bottom line for ME is that I am very glad that none of these neanderthals will ever become president……….

Posted by: Searambler | November 14, 2011, 8:50 am 8:50 am

He doesn’t believe in water boarding but it’s OK if he takes the credit for all the information Bush policies got him, .that’s Obama, take credit for anything good and blame others if it goes badly.

Posted by: Freedom | November 14, 2011, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Give it another year, and we will all be writing
In “ron paul” at the voting booths. There’s not
A lot of appeal on either side. At least Ron Paul
Is consistently non-violent on all issues, scandal-free,
All-America
And honest .
As far as my opinion on Waterboarding – I see it
As torture … Is it Un-American ? Is it a necessary
Means to an end ? Should it be used routinely or
Just as a last resort ? To me, because war is war, I
Think there are a lot of “grey areas”, but “enhanced
Interrogation technique ” just sounds like a metaphor
For torture … Let’s talk about those less fortunate than
The terrorist – lets talk about the rights of our own
Defenseless American citizens In the womb ( they have feelings/nervous systems too)
And are alive when brutalized and unceremoniously
Murdered on demand.

Yeah – Waterboarding terrorists is bad, but violently
Killing American babies up to nine months in the
Womb is okay! ? !What would Lincoln do ?
Until we stop allowing massacring innocent
Children , there is NO room to pretend we are:
“civil” / “Civilized”. Abortion is the worst savagery …
For what ? A romp in the hay ? That’s beyond
Repulsive . Obama is such a fake … He denies comfort
Rooms to infants born alive after abortions, but
Then pretends he has a conscience …

The story is on you tube — he is pro- terrorist but
Anti-deafen less babies.

That’s psychotic… But he’s the king of lies , so
What does anybody really expect ?

PS: Ask yourself: what was the purpose of denying comfort rooms
To infants who are going to die anyway. He was the only one to vote against
It… He didn’t want to “punish” the staff “with a baby” I guess. The man
Is the strangest being to come along EVER . Anyone who can see any
Good in him, please inform the rest of us. Heaven help US !

Posted by: Just In Case Jesus is Delayed | November 14, 2011, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Water-boarding is torture and useless. It’s also against the Geneva Convention. The republican excuse is that these people are not technically enemy soldiers, I agree. Then the republicans say they should be tried by the military. You can’t have it both ways. The military should not be trying criminal thugs, by doing so you just elevate their status. These people are common criminals and should be tried in civilian courts by a jury of American citizens.

Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Commonsenseparty, your logic escapes me. You are faulting President Obama for his spending when he inherited 3 big problems that would guarantee budget woes. It was the destructive spending and acts of the Bush administration that got us into this economic mess.
As for your assertion that only now is President Obama dealing with the economy, that is just a false statement. Unless you never read the news, you would know he has been dealing with it from day one.

Posted by: Librarian53 | November 14, 2011, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Yeah, Obama is a lot more interested in illegal, unconstitutional invasions of sovereign Nations under the guise of ending dictatorships which result in terrorist organizations taking over said Nation (Libya). What a joke. Nixon was forced from office for a lot less. Slick Willie was served Articles of Impeachment for a lot less – just ask Monica.

Posted by: Banderman | November 14, 2011, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Librarian53 | November 14, 2011, 9:10 am —- Inherited? No, he spent more than any other person in history, MORE THAN ANYONE IN HISTORY, to get the job, so spare me the inherited BS. So let’s see, the very 1st thing he does after your so-called “inheriting” those 3 problems is spend another trillion plus for Obamacare, another trillion for a stimulus, send more troops to Afghanistan, assist in a civil war in Libya, QE1, QE2, Operation twist, etc. Obama said we would be out of Iraq within 16 months remember? What did Obama himself say if the economy didn’t turn around by his 3 year mark? Nuff said!

Posted by: commonsenseparty | November 14, 2011, 9:27 am 9:27 am

What I’d like to see is an interview of the children of the Japanese officers who were executed after WW2 by the USA for waterboarding -nothing else- U.S. airmen from the Doolittle Raid on Tokyo. We called it “torture” then. Then interview the GOP and ask them if we should compensate those Japanese families for “wrongly” executing men by waterboarding “torture.” The British, who suffered for decades from IRA terrorists who even murdered British war heroes and NEVER resorted to waterboarding because they did, and still do, consider it torture. John McCain, who should know from his captivity in N.Vietnam, says it’s torture. The U.S. Marine officers in Guantanamo say it’s torture. It IS torture.

Posted by: The_Mick | November 14, 2011, 9:36 am 9:36 am

If we train our own military with it……it is fair game for the enemy.

If it isn’t fair game for the enemy, then stop using it against our own guys, in training.

Be upfront, and honest……not deceiving.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | November 14, 2011, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Just because we are becoming a third world economic power it doesn’t mean we need to become a third world country morally. We’ve fought many wars and have never condoned torture. That’s what made us different from our enemies. John McCain, who has actually suffered torture in a Vietnamese concentration camp, is even against water-boarding. He knows we do not do that as Americans.

Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Obama says the GOP is wrong because waterboarding is torture, yet this is the same guy who said that a baby who survives the abortion procedure and is born alive, should be denied medical care and left to die, lest the “choice” of the woman be violated. I say that is torture for the baby.

Posted by: Benjamin | November 14, 2011, 9:46 am 9:46 am

BENJAMIN

I too oppose abortion, but I also oppose the death penalty. Human life is human life. The children starving here and in other countries are just as human as an egg with a sperm attached to it. Where is the outrage about their deaths? All I hear from the right wing republicans is how we have to cut programs for the poor and elderly, are their lives less important than a fetus? The hypocrisy is monumental.

Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 10:02 am 10:02 am

This coming from a guy who irrationally defends abortion to the world by saying, “I don’t want my daughter ‘punished’ with a baby.”

Posted by: EPU | November 14, 2011, 10:06 am 10:06 am

commonsenseparty, I shouldn’t have to explain the definition of inheriting to you. I’ll put it more simply, President Obama was sworn into office as the country had a stock market meltdown two months earlier, record-breaking trade imbalances for years which directly translated into jobs lost here, and a banking crisis brought on by weakening banking regulations. Oh, and lets not forget the ‘inherited’ wars that were started and maintained so badly they weren’t any closer to a conclusion after 8 years of fighting, Oh, and the budget deficits due to Bush’s policies were adding debt at an alarming rate, from the wars and his Tax Cuts for the Rich. And don’t forget the ongoing interest on all that new debt, year after year.
He didn’t spend a trillion dollars on the Affordable Care Act and no competent economist would say that. Most of the proposals don’t even come in to effect until 2014.
Most reputable economists said the trillion on stimulus was too little for a country of our size. But they agree that spending it prevented us from falling in to a Depression. A depression causes much more suffering and is harder to pull out of than a recession, so the wisdom of the stimulus is obvious to all those who aren’t wearing partisan glasses. Try to understand that all the money people lost in the stock market, in housing values and other investments was causing a downward spiral of lost jobs, lower government revenue on the state and federal level, which continued the job losses. For heaven’s sake, in some places they were laying off tons of police and firemen, that’s how much harm had been done to the economy. And the Republicans answer was to block almost every credible jobs plan, even a bill that would have increased the percentage of American-made goods purchased by our government and military!
Stop watching so much fixed news, use a reliable non-partisan factcheck site when politicians speak and maybe you’ll see the light, that the Republican policies of the last 30 years that they continue to tout are the worst thing for our economy, jobs and the well-being of the vast majority of the American people.

Posted by: Librarian53 | November 14, 2011, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Where are all you people coming from? Are you in another world? Have you all forgotten how many of of our servicemen have been killed by these fanatics?The Cole, Beruit, the twin towers, have all been done by muslims in their 20′s They are sworn to kill us all. They believe in a satanic god, who says it’s okay to kill infidals, babies, women, even our own if they get in the way.Wake up you jerks or you’ll be burying a lot of your own people, if your alive to do it..

Posted by: Art | November 14, 2011, 10:32 am 10:32 am

art posted, “They are sworn to kill us all. They believe in a satanic god, who says it’s okay to kill infidals, babies, women, even our own if they get in the way.”

Prove it.

Posted by: Searambler | November 14, 2011, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Librarian53 | November 14, 2011, 9:10 am —- Inherited? No, he spent more than any other person in history, MORE THAN ANYONE IN HISTORY, to get the job, so spare me the inherited BS. Posted by: commonsenseparty | November 14, 2011, 9:27 am.

So you believe that, because he SOUGHT the presidency, that somehow means that NOTHING the previous administration did, nothing they started, nothing they screwed up, none of their fiscal policy, matters at all? That Obama walked through the door of the White House on January 20th, 2009, with a clean slate, a balanced budget, zero national debt, a thriving economy, no wars, and low unemployment. Sadly, I think you really DO believe that…………

Posted by: Searambler | November 14, 2011, 10:54 am 10:54 am

If we train our own military with it……it is fair game for the enemy.
If it isn’t fair game for the enemy, then stop using it against our own guys, in training. Posted by: Rick McDaniel | November 14, 2011, 9:42 am.

HUH?!?!?

Posted by: Searambler | November 14, 2011, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Every religion has its fanatics; you can’t condemn a whole religion by a few misfits. Catholics burned people in the inquisition but kept knowledge alive for the renaissance to occur. In fact the Muslim religion has the same Profits and many of the beliefs as the Jews. Hassidic Jews have the same laws regarding women as the Koran. Some Christians burned health care clinics and killed doctors over abortion, should we condemn the whole Christian religion?

Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Waterboarding is part of a fundamental Conservative notion that “getting back” and war are preferred directions for our government. The underlying idea is that these are the best actions to create a safer and better world.

In my view, that’s one reason why Conservatives can be vehemently pro-life on one hand, yet support torture, war, and suffering on the other hand. But here’s what is mystifying for Progressives like me: today’s conservative political power calls itself a Christian voice, yet Christ’s teachings clearly oppose violence, revenge, bloodshed and war; his teachings support loving one another, helping for the poor, and caring for little children.

Our society is now faced with paying back borrowed Trillions spent on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. While we sit in the shambles of our economy, we are looking back at a decade of “getting back” after 9/11 and questioning the value of so many lost lives and so much spent national treasure.

I think the nation has reached a general consensus that our economic recovery demands this debt must be paid. But here’s the REAL question: where does the money come from?

Conservatives want to reduce the debt immediately – not by drastically cutting massively ballooned military spending, but by reducing social services while enforcing their view of “austerity” on the downtrodden. Progressives want to cut the debt by immediately creating more tax payments (new jobs, closed corporate loopholes, and raised taxes on the wealthy) while reducing military spending over time.

The elections ahead will force us to decide what directions Americans want to build for our generations ahead.

Posted by: green.goddess | November 14, 2011, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Torture, water boarding, drone strikes, snipers.
Should we go with beheading.
I’ll take the torture of giving guns to drug cartels, financing Worthless Green energy
companies, And the torture of being called lazy by This President, who voted about
3 times as a senator and knows nothing about work. Remember he is focused like a laser
on jobs to the tune of 9% unemployment. David Alexrod better get on this next.

Posted by: deadwrestler | November 14, 2011, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Abortion is murder …. Brutal , heartless murder.
There will always be ills in our world ( unless
We all really act like Jesus -wanted ). But a society
Who disregards the most vulnerable human life as human waste
Cannot sustain itself as a civil society . Truth be told,all other “issues”
Are based on this – is human life precious ?- at all stages-an
Inherent , inalienable right ?…. When we say “no” in reply, we Reduce ourselves
to an uncivil society and every other argument falls into
Hypocrisy . Doctors know when life begins… That’s why
They didn’t have to take the “Hypocratic Oath” After abortion was made
Legal. ( that mentions
Never using abortifacients and:”First Do No Harm” )–no longer
Is required by MD s entering the medical field.
Hunger and other travesties have many organizations
Compared to these victims . These voiceless victims
Are hidden and disposed of as “waste” … Look at
The pictures of their poor mangled bodies on the Internet .
That’s only part of the story. We will never know
If we killed the next Lincoln or the next cure for cancer.
We all started as “sperm and egg” … And that’s a miracle
Not to be taken so lightly. To do so , is to lend one’s very
Soul to Nazi -Like Mentality. Besides, many babies are
Viable (able to survive outside of mother). A country that can’t protect or
Defend
Its most helpless members is not fit to comment
Much else in the arena of morality.

Posted by: Daisy | November 14, 2011, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

President Obama should have been asked to comment on the debate discussion about the President’s authority to order the assassination of an American citizen! Did he agree with Newt Gingrich?

Posted by: Common _ Sense | November 14, 2011, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

You’re absolutely right ,” Common Sense”…. I wonder why he didn’t shoot
His terrorist friends along with that other citizen that he shot : his friends
From the elite hood – Bernadine Dohrn and William Ayers ?
Selective about which home- terrorists he kills (?)
This incarnate is just “too much”, yet during the campaign 2008 ,
the press
Corps didn’t even dare say the word “controversial” when tip-toeing
Around him. They gave about as much opposition to this “unknown” entity”
As a stuffed teddy bear on Valium .
PS:
I miss President Bush too. He wasn’t perfect but he had good intentions (
Maybe that’s why we’re here (lol). …. Get it – The road to hell.

Posted by: Daisy | November 14, 2011, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Supreme Court 2006 has already rendered decision US must abide by Geneva Convention, US Laws, other treaties which outlaw use of torture. Multiple univeristy law school law review articles were recently written on Supreme Courts decision back in 2006. Bush was to have stopped use of waterboarding after that decision, but secetly he still allowed. When it was discovered waterboarding was still being used government investigation and government hearings followed. Multiple top military officials gave testimony waterboarding is torture. Foreign allies and many in US were pushing to have Bush prosecuted. Military guidelines forbide US to torture prisoners of war. Water boarding is torture. After Preident Obama took office waterboarding was finally stopped. This is legally a dead issue.

Use of waterboarding would make US no better than Hitler or Japanese when they used torture on prisoners of war. US executed individuals from these countries legally found guilty of using waterboarding torture. US must always set an honorable example , be a reputable good leader of the free world which supports democracy, freedom, and protection of human rights. Waterboarding has legally been found to be torture.

No one should support torture of prisoners by US military. And waterboarding is legally torture.

Posted by: Sharon | November 14, 2011, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Obviously he hasn’t been following up on his history. What does he think was going on during the research of nuclear fallout and isotopes on babies, mothers, blacks, and others in the 50s? Remember the infecting of thousands of Guatamalans with gnorrhea and syphillis just to see what would happen? How about the doctor who was injecting people with live cancer cells, who was then elected to VP of American Cancer Society? The radiation, STD, cancer, and other tests were performed on American citizens without their permission. You really think the powers that be would be more merciful to an enemy???

Posted by: Pete | November 14, 2011, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

You’re absolutely right ,” Common Sense”…. I wonder why he didn’t shoot
His terrorist friends along with that other citizen that he shot : his friends
From the elite hood – Bernadine Dohrn and William Ayers ?
Selective about which home- terrorists he kills (?)
This incarnate is just “too much”, yet during the campaign 2008 ,
the press
Corps didn’t even dare say the word “controversial” when tip-toeing
Around him. They gave about as much opposition to this “unknown” entity”
As a stuffed teddy bear on Valium .

Speaking of “selective”, why doesn’t Obama want
To sto using Waterboarding as training for our
Troops …. Is it just “torture” for terrorists , not our OWN
Men and women ? Sounds like Obama all over. Giving
Our Allies bad gifts and trying to take away their
Boundaries – while handing money overseas to terrorists
And For foreign abortions . WORSE than a drunken sailor…

PS:
I miss President Bush too. He wasn’t perfect but he had good intentions (
Maybe that’s why we’re here (lol). …. Get it – The road to hell.

Posted by: Daisy | November 14, 2011, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Guess Mr. obam enjoys the terrorist attacking the free world. Mayb he vieo tapes the attacks and watches them like a war movie eating his pocorn and drinkg what ever beer it is for the for his summits

Posted by: Jim Rod | November 14, 2011, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

obumer is OK with murdering unborn babies but will not water board his muslim brothers so we can information that would save American lives. What a hypocrite him and anyone else is that feels water boarding is wrong but murdering babies is OK.

Posted by: George G | November 14, 2011, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

“Guess Mr. obam enjoys the terrorist attacking the free world. Mayb he vieo tapes the attacks and watches them like a war movie eating his pocorn and drinkg what ever beer it is for the for his summits”

Wow. Perfect example of the Right Wing of today. THIS is why we on the Left are often so disdainful of those on the Right…………..

Posted by: Searambler | November 14, 2011, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

What a hypocrite him and anyone else is that feels water boarding is wrong but murdering babies is OK. Posted by: George G | November 14, 2011, 1:37 pm.

Water boarding is torture. Murdering babies is illegal. Abortion is not illegal. Ergo, abortion is not ‘murdering babies’. I support a woman’s choice to do with HER OWN BODY what she deems fit. Whatever her decision is, it is between her, her doctor, and her god. What gives YOU the right to tell someone else what they can and cannot do with THEIR OWN BODY?!?!? If MEN were the ones who got pregnant, abortion would be free, easy, and accessible at thousands of places across the country………

Posted by: Searambler | November 14, 2011, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

I too oppose abortion, but I also oppose the death penalty. Human life is human life. Also the quality of that life must be considered. Every human being conceived has a right to be fed, nurtured and given the opportunity to be happy. The right wing seems to forget that life goes on after conception and you just can’t quit once the child is born.

The children starving here and in other countries are just as human as an egg with a sperm attached to it. Where is the outrage about their deaths? All I hear from the right wing republicans is how we have to cut programs for the poor and elderly, are their lives less important than a fetus? The hypocrisy is monumental.

Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Republican Sen. John McCain criticized statements by some of the 2012 Republican nominees for president Monday, tweeting, “Very disappointed by statements at SC GOP debate supporting waterboarding. Waterboarding is torture.”

Posted by: Searambler | November 14, 2011, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

! Anybody except Obama !

Posted by: Jesus | November 14, 2011, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

TMFERRETTI–”Water-boarding is torture and useless. It’s also against the Geneva Convention. The republican excuse is that these people are not technically enemy soldiers, I agree. Then the republicans say they should be tried by the military. You can’t have it both ways. The military should not be trying criminal thugs, by doing so you just elevate their status.”— First, it is neither torture or useless.. Even Leon Penetta (who workd for OBama said it was acceptable). As far as useless is concerned, the Waterboarding that was done to Shalied Shak Mohammed yeilded the name of two contacts including a former driver that ultimately led to discovering where OBL was located.. IN AFFECT, Obama was only able to get Osama, by using Intel that was obtained by WATERBOARDING… Second, It is NOT ILLEGAL under the geneva convention… In fact. we waterboard our own Navy SEALS during their survival training…to aid them in dealing with inhansed interrogation techniques..We have been doing it to them for decades.. Finally, Republicans do not validate waterboarding or extended incarceration on the basis that the detainees are NOT enemy combatants, they validate it on the bais that they ARE… which is Why they SHOULD be tried in a military tribunal and not in civilian courts.. Civilian courts is where their “status” would get elevated the most…not to mention the fact that POWs are not entitled to the the civilian rights of our citizens.. they are entitled to the due process of a military court and thats it.. they are NOT citizens of this country..

Posted by: arkie vet | November 14, 2011, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

TMFERRETTI–”The children starving here and in other countries are just as human as an egg with a sperm attached to it. Where is the outrage about their deaths? All I hear from the right wing republicans is how we have to cut programs for the poor and elderly, are their lives less important than a fetus? The hypocrisy is monumental.”— No one says that they are not.. and by a VAST majority, the conservatives in this country do not oppose birth control or abstinence education… Don’t confuse starving children with the right to terminate a pregnancy that many view as a viable life..One is the result of a society that refuses to educate its people and then fails to take action to protect the children while the other is the result of a society that view CONVENIENCE as more a more profound right than actual life… Right wingers do not want to cut NECESSARY programs for the elderly and for children, they want to cut the WASTE that is driving us to the brink of self destruction… Let me ask you which is worse? Cutting Medicare or Social security even if it means that someone might have LESS, or leaving it alone to collapse from its own weight resulting in EVERYONE having NOTHING… Which is ther greater evil, necessary cuts, or ignoring the problem until EVERYONE suffers fully?

Posted by: arkie vet | November 14, 2011, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Posted by: arkie vet | November 14, 2011, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

John McCain has weighed in again – waterboarding is torture.

Posted by: Dave | November 14, 2011, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

SEARAMBLER–” Ergo, abortion is not ‘murdering babies’. I support a woman’s choice to do with HER OWN BODY what she deems fit. Whatever her decision is, it is between her, her doctor, and her god. What gives YOU the right to tell someone else what they can and cannot do with THEIR OWN BODY?!?!?”— Hummm.. Okay, lets take that at face value.. Then by your logic, If I make a fist, and throw a punch (something that i am doing with my OWN BODY), I can not be held accountable if my fist breaks someone’s nose? Right? What someone does with their own body IS their right according to you. Obviously, not if that right infringes on the safety and well being of someone else.. EXCEPT in the case of abortion… In the case of Abortion, the right of the woman extends into the third trimester.. when the child has fingers, toes, eyelashes, and in some cases can actually be born prematurely and survive and flourish.. yet that child is still without any right to life… IF its biological “host” so decides… So when it comes to the “Rights” of personal control of one’s own body, thsoe rights do not extend to the act of harm to another human (or even non human creature for that matter), UNLESS that human is the most defenseless form of human life we there is.. then, its just fine…

Posted by: arkie vet | November 14, 2011, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

DAVE—”John McCain has weighed in again – waterboarding is torture.”— Considering what he went through in Hanoi, I respect his right to that opinion, but I don’t agree with it… Considering that we do it to our own as a matter of training, that it does NO physical damage (McCain had both his arms broke while he was a POW), and that it has fewer lasting phychological effects than playing rock and roll at full volume 24 hrs a day does (something else that we do). I reserve the right to my opinion that it is NOT.. and to all the earlier posters.. IT HAS NOT BEEN FORBIDDEN by the Geneva convention..

Posted by: arkie vet | November 14, 2011, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

green.goddess–”Our society is now faced with paying back borrowed Trillions spent on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. While we sit in the shambles of our economy, we are looking back at a decade of “getting back” after 9/11 and questioning the value of so many lost lives and so much spent national treasure.”— just to keep you straight… We have not spent “trillions” in Iraq.. In fact the total cost for Iraq (in additional spending) is HALF that of the 2009 “Stimulus” . The total cost of Iraq, Afganistan, and Pakistan combined from 2003 to the present is over 300 billion LESS that the total for the 2009 stimulus, TARP2, the Auto bailout, and the bailouts of Freddie, Fannie, and the major banks combined.. Obama spent 787 billion on the stimulus alone (which did not correct the unemployment problem) while the amount of money spent for Iraq frm 2003 to 2008 (Bush’s term) was Less than 565 billion and the total for all the conflicts combined during this period was 685 billion. Our wars in the middle east have not only added about 975 billion, while Obama’s Stimulus and bailouts have added 1.35 trillion….

Posted by: arkie vet | November 14, 2011, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

After what Obama’s done to our Nation,
Who would WANT to follow and clean up ?
He’s dug us
Into such a mess that it’s a “mystery” to
Me that so many can say nothing of it.
Maybe we’re all in shock or trying to catch our
breath,or something .
Obama singlehandedly “water boarded”
Our Country ( well not singlehandedly).

No -I stand corrected – He killed America.

Based on his spending alone – ( even if I liked
Everything else about him) – he is The For .

Posted by: Beast of Daniel | November 14, 2011, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

ARKIE VET | NOVEMBER 14, 2011, 4:43 PM – Once again, you and I disagree.

The final bill for a decade of war will run at least $3.7 trillion and could reach as high as $4.4 trillion, according to the research project “Costs of War” by Brown University’s Institute for International Studies. So like I said in my first post, citizens ARE faced with paying back Trillions spent on war. Regardless of when the money is spent – in Iraq or decades later on wounded Vets – we are questioning the value of that war.

In the 10 years since U.S. troops went into Afghanistan, supposedly to root out those behind the 9/11 attacks, our spending on the conflicts totaled $2.3 trillion to $2.7 trillion.

Those numbers will continue to rise when considering overlooked costs such as long-term obligations to our wounded veterans and more projected war spending as we withdraw. And btw, the Brown University estimates do not include at least $1 trillion MORE in interest payments and other war related expenses that have not yet surfaced.

Posted by: green.goddess | November 14, 2011, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Unbelievable! What would you rather be? Waterboarded or assassinated?

Posted by: Lo | November 14, 2011, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

PAUL Harvely stated it is not one world. If we play by the rual that we do the rest of the world will run over us the way they do the rest of the world that can not defend it self does . So should we sit and let them over take use or should we defend ourselves in the maner it take to keap out way of life????????????????

Posted by: John Widhalm | November 14, 2011, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

I think it has to
Do with that whole Geneva Cinvention.
The war on terrorists is tricky business, though .
But yeah, blogger “LO ” – Obama assassinates a citizen terrorist
(not one if his chicago terrorist buddies) And everybody’s
OKAY with that (?!?) …. Then mention Waterboarding
And Obama just has to put in his two cents in ( more than we
Have in The Treasury , thanks to him). I’m with John McCain
- it is torture…but the worst torture is seeing Obama ruin
Our America ….. Drip by drip by drip …. Every day,
Some new incredulous ..some thing or other.

“Whoa to the inhabitants of earth…. For the d has come down to you …

Posted by: Peace | November 15, 2011, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Funny how NoBo can put down water-boarding yet it has given him one of his few successes, a dead Bin Laden. It’s analogous to him complaining about the Iraqi surge which gave him another success.

Maybe he doesn’t like it since they were both due to George Bush.

Posted by: Noz | November 15, 2011, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Liberians3: What we are saying and I will try to put it so you understand it….what we are saying is waterboarding is illegal….we are not saying soldiers do not have the right to protect themselves. When you are waterboarding…obviously you have the terrorist in hand and surrounded by a group of Americans…that is a different scenerio. If you say it is o.k… that also means that if one of our soldiers get captured ….you are saying waterboarding is o.k. to do to them also. That is a sign of ignorance and stupidity. Every military man in high command and those who witness waterboarding and evaluate its value have all said…it produces nothing but lies. Very little, if anything comes out of it in spite of what you do. We, as a nation, have become smarter and have better techniques to get information from hostages in our country and our country is safer for it ….it is not when we do waterboarding …because all we get are lies to stop the waterboarding. Intelligence has ways where through questioning and observation get more pertinent information than waterboarding every produced. Start reading some information on this subject and you will see what I am saying is correct. Besides….it makes our nation look hostile and ask Mr. Bush if he would like to go to Switzerland and some other countries who feel it is breaking the law….he will be arrested if he goes there…how about that?

Posted by: talmag | November 15, 2011, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Obama is about the most stupidest president in the world he is trying to get american in a war someone need to impeach that sob

Posted by: johnlene kennedy | November 23, 2011, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.