Obama Tells Super Committee To ‘Bite The Bullet’
With the deadline for the deficit-cutting Congressional supercommittee rapidly approaching, President Obama urged lawmakers today to abandon their “rigid positions” and reach a consensus, warning there are no “magic beans” to solve the deficit problem.
“My hope is that over the next several days, the congressional leadership on the supercommittee go ahead and bite the bullet and do what needs to be done because the math won’t change,” Obama told reporters at a press conference. “There’s no magic formula. There are no magic beans that you can toss in the ground and suddenly a bunch of money grows on trees. We’ve got to just go ahead and do the responsible thing.”
With just ten days to go, the president urged lawmakers not to try and change the automatic cuts triggered if the committee fails to lower the deficit by at least $1.2 trillion.
“The whole idea of the sequester was to make sure that both sides felt obligated to move off rigid positions and do what was required to help the country. Since that time, they’ve had a lot of conversations but it feels as if people continue to try to stick with their rigid positions rather than solve the problem,” Obama said. “It just feels as if people keep on wanting to jigger the math so that they get a different outcome. Well the equation, no matter how you do it, is going to be the same. If you want a balanced approach … then prudent cuts have to be matched up with revenue.”
The president, however, stopped short of saying he would veto a bill that attempts to turn off part or all of the sequester.
“I’m not going to comment on whether I veto a particular bill until I actually see a bill because I still hold out the prospect that there’s going to be a light bulb moment where everybody says ‘ah ha,’ here’s what we’ve got to do,” he said.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
One little problem. Given the fact that Congress has high salaries, benefits, and perks that according to a recent expose include an ability to engage in insider trading without threat of legal punishment and recent statements from high places that the military should be exempted from cuts and painfully obvious efforts by both the GOP and the democrats to protect their wealthy donors’ bank accounts, its pretty easy to see who is actually going to be biting the bullet; those with the little or no defense will be the only ones “biting the bullet” when all is said and done.
Posted by: whatever | November 14, 2011, 6:55 am 6:55 am
So once again it seems to come down to………(wait for it)…. the poor will end up taking the brunt of the reductions of medicare, social security, an increase in taxes, etc. While the rich and politicians (oh wait I already said rich) get off with out paying anything. Nice. Let see I believe the words were ” Let Them Eat Cake”
Posted by: Neil Staudinger | November 14, 2011, 7:32 am 7:32 am
Posted by: Neil Staudinger | November 14, 2011, 7:32 am 7:32 am
There is no magic Hope and Change money tree.
In a civilized society, there is no economic rationale to support the current reality where 51% of American taxpayers pay no federal income taxes yet enjoy federal benefits disproportionately compared to the wealthy who subsidize them. Everyone must pay something, even the poor. No freeloaders.
“Everybody has got to make some sacrifices, everybody’s gotta take a haircut.” – President Barack Obama, April 5, 2011
Did you get that, Neil? Everybody. That means you, too.
Posted by: Chuck | November 14, 2011, 7:58 am 7:58 am
““It just feels as if people keep on wanting to jigger the math so that they get a different outcome.” – village idiot
If FEELS that way? Don’t you know? Is it easier to lead from behind when you don’t even bother to know the details?
Posted by: foggy | November 14, 2011, 8:10 am 8:10 am
This Stupid Committee is useless; they need to be debating jobs programs not the meaningless debt and deficit. Nothing is going to happen except the triggered cuts that will put thousands of more Americans out of work.
Worry about the debt when we’re in good economic times not now. We are not Greece and Italy. They borrow (sell bonds) at a 7% interest rate, ours is less than 2%. We are the biggest market in the world; countries that export to us sure as hell aren’t worried about our deficit.
Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 8:52 am 8:52 am
Absolutely void of leadership.
Posted by: Freedom | November 14, 2011, 9:03 am 9:03 am
Republicans complain about the President not leading Congress (by the way, they think he’s a dictator). It’s not his job to lead Congress, Congress needs to lead Congress. The President leads the American people. If Congress is grid locked because of the confederacy of dunces tea party they need to own up to it. They delay and obstruct over the deficit, which will not see any results, even if they by some miracle reach agreement, until 10 or 20 years from now. The American people need something done about the lack of jobs now. Why don’t they do the obvious and try to stop the out-sourcing which has cost us millions of jobs already. Could it be if they take that cheap labor market away from the corporations the donations, insider stock trades, and other perks will dry up?
Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Dear Members of The Deficit Reduction Committee:
Instead of obsessing and deadlocking on what to cut from the Federal Deficit there IS another approach that will accomplish the same result of eliminating the deficit over time without raising any current tax rates: make the economy grow. For every new high wage job created, the income tax base expands proportionately and results in higher tax receipts at current federal tax rates.
Solely for the purposes of a starting point for debate on what action by the federal government would accomplish economic growth sufficient to achieve that result, a proposal of tax reform (i.e. not just “closing loopholes”) coupled with a national re-industrialization fiscal policy is offered at: :The Economy Needs Fundamental Reforms, Not More Stimulus” at OpenSalon.com.
Posted by: Craig Cotora | November 14, 2011, 9:33 am 9:33 am
CHUCK– the 51% that don’t pay taxes ARE POOR. We have to solve the question of WHY are they poor? Because they’re lazy? Some are. Most are working people who did the right things but simply are not getting paid enough by their employers.
Posted by: america2929 | November 14, 2011, 10:13 am 10:13 am
TMFERRETTI: I couldn’t agree more. All I see are both sides bickering back and forth accomplishing nothing. Just like some posters on these boards..And they want him to lead and then say he’s a dictator. No matter what he does they slam him and have from day one. And since he’s such a bad president, who are the GOP running against him? Clowns. What a circus. This is the BEST they have? God help us all. And I just love the way the GOP bashes the president on his healthcare…the SAME program Romney put in MA.
Posted by: Barb | November 14, 2011, 10:16 am 10:16 am
BARB
The debate the other night shows the republican lack of understanding the American people. President Obama has never served in the military, but is actions show he takes it very seriously when he has to put American soldiers in harms way. He doesn’t do it just to show we’re tough. He understands the devastation a soldiers death cause to that family.
These republican candidates talk tough for political purposes and can’t understand that when the President of the United States runs around with his hair on fire, soldiers can die. Didn’t they learn anything from Iraq? As an ex-military man I wouldn’t want my life or my comrades life put on the line because some politician what to stand on his head to act tough for a few votes.
Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 10:33 am 10:33 am
In a civilized society, there is no economic rationale to support the current reality where 51% of American taxpayers pay no federal income taxes yet enjoy federal benefits disproportionately compared to the wealthy who subsidize them. Everyone must pay something, even the poor. No freeloaders. Posted by: Chuck | November 14, 2011, 7:58 am.
Those so-called “freeloaders” as you put it DO pay something. Just not federal taxes. But they pay state and local and payroll and sales and energy taxes. Unfortunately for them, they are too POOR to pay federal taxes under our tax laws. If we were a TRULY “civilized society” then we wouldn’t have 50 million people living in poverty right now. Almost one in six Americans today. Middle class incomes have actually fallen over the last 30 years, compared to 1980 figures, adjusted for inflation. While the richest two percent have seen incomes rise by some 300% in the just the last 15 years. Yeah, our “civilized society” has been really great for the rich. But not so much for the rest of us………..
Posted by: Searambler | November 14, 2011, 10:50 am 10:50 am
“Those so-called “freeloaders” as you put it DO pay something. Just not federal taxes.”
Posted by: Searambler | November 14, 2011, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Totally irrelevant. Interstate highways are paid for with federal income taxes. If you drive on them and you’re not paying for them, you’re a freeloader. In fact, if you use ANY federal services paid for by federal income taxes and you don’t personally pay any federal income taxes yourself, you’re a freeloader. Period.
Posted by: Chuck | November 14, 2011, 11:03 am 11:03 am
“CHUCK– the 51% that don’t pay taxes ARE POOR.”
Posted by: america2929 | November 14, 2011, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Not really. According to the IRS, the highest AGI threshold for the bottom 50% is $32,396 (2009 figures). The poverty threshold for one person in 2011 is $10,890 (Source: HHS). Also, many of the “poor” receive a ton of social assistance benefits not reflected in those figures (food stamps, etc.). I’ve run into families with $45K+ incomes when these benefits are factored in. That’s not poor. And they don’t pay any federal income taxes.
Posted by: Chuck | November 14, 2011, 11:13 am 11:13 am
The Affordable Health Care Act would make everybody pay something for their health care. Now if you republicans are so worried about people freeloading why don’t you support this bill? You can’t have it both ways. The only reason you don’t is because it was supported by President Obama. Quit being so narrow minded you can’t see what is good and bad
Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 11:16 am 11:16 am
“countries that export to us sure as hell aren’t worried about our deficit.”
Please let that quote be the stupidest thing I read today.
Posted by: foggy | November 14, 2011, 11:20 am 11:20 am
“No matter what he does they slam him and have from day one. And since he’s such a bad president, who are the GOP running against him? Clowns. What a circus. This is the BEST they have?”
Posted by: Barb
Don’t slam a president on day one. Slam him a full year before he even gets elected. Like Barb.
Posted by: foggy | November 14, 2011, 11:25 am 11:25 am
“The Affordable Health Care Act would make everybody pay something for their health care.”
No it doesn’t.
Posted by: foggy | November 14, 2011, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Then explain to me what they are worried about. They are worried about Americans not having jobs and the money to buy their products. You republicans can go on and on about this deficit, which won’t be significantly lowered for 5 to 10 years out, until hell freezes over. Lowering the deficit is not going to get us out of this recession now. Spending will.
Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 11:35 am 11:35 am
We all have to have skin in the game, even if some have more scabs than skin.
Posted by: deadwrestler | November 14, 2011, 11:41 am 11:41 am
There are so called Groups that also hide behind the Church clause, to obtain not paying federal tax and local taxes. which all of these groups as American, should help with the aid of the Country at this time. In which They So Desire to Live In. If this is one nation Congress and those high salaries, benefits, and perks that according to a recent expose include an ability to engage in insider trading without threat of legal punishment in the Government that in which have so many perks need to feel where we are at with also contributing. As the Federal Deficit is getting higher. where are the jobs. two years unemployed I have lost to much, and need and would like to work if I get a job, until I die which ever comes first. shame on all of you that COULD Make that difference. Shame Shame working in America must suck that You have nothing to show, Oh but the sand Box that you play in.
Posted by: unemployedamerican2010 | November 14, 2011, 11:47 am 11:47 am
The American people need something done about the lack of jobs now.
Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Obama has decided to delay his decision on the Keystone Pipeline until after the next election. He is putting his campaign ahead of JOBS.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | November 14, 2011, 11:50 am 11:50 am
“The head of China’s biggest ratings agency, Dagong Global Credit Rating, is warning that it may downgrade the US’s sovereign debt rating”
He said that two days ago. Please add that to your working knowledge of things-China-is-worried-about.
Here’s another clue. The US is not Greece. Illinois is Greece. Michigan is Italy.
Posted by: foggy | November 14, 2011, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Bill Maher would say bite my Co*k…… isn’t ABC proud of Bill Maher????
Posted by: who said that | November 14, 2011, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
President Obama has never served in the military, but is actions show he takes it very seriously when he has to put American soldiers in harms way. He doesn’t do it just to show we’re tough. He understands the devastation a soldiers death cause to that family.
Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Bull.
630 American soldiers died in the Afghanistan operation in the years 2001 through 2008, when Mr. Bush was president, while 1097 American soldiers have died in the years 2009, 2010, and 2011. This report was in August, so there are more.
Obama rules of engagement:
McChrystal: Imposing restrictions that play into enemies’ hands.
* If any civilians appear where we meet the Taliban, our troops are to “break contact” — to retreat.
* Unless our troops in combat are absolutely certain that no civilians are present, they’re denied artillery or air support.
Others:
No night or surprise searches
Villagers are to be warned prior to searches
Afghan National Army, or ANA, or Afghan National Police, or ANP, must accompany U.S. units on searches
U.S. soldiers may not fire at insurgents unless they are preparing to fire first
U.S. forces cannot engage insurgents if civilians are present
Only women can search women
can fire on insurgents if they catch them placing an IED but not if insurgents walk away from where the explosives are.
He is getting US soldiers KILLED. And the media, which HOWLED when Bush was in, are SILENT.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | November 14, 2011, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Ok, so what, are the Chinese going to quit stocking Wal-Mart and Home Depot? The Chinese buy our bonds because they are cheaper and more secure than other countries. They rely on us to provide a market for their goods.
Illinois and Michigan together have a higher GDP than both Greece and Italy. We can argue all we want, but the United States is not going down the tubes because of this deficit.
We are going down the tubes because people are not working, can’t or are afraid to spend money and we have the lowest consumer confidence rating in decades. Other countries see this; they won’t increase investment until their biggest market starts to worry about what is important instead of this meaningless debt and deficit issue.
It’s time we started to act like the United States of America instead of some third world country.
Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
“We can argue all we want, but the United States is not going down the tubes because of this deficit. ”
You mean debt. And we are already in the tubes. And we are being ‘led’ by thieves and weasels.
“It’s time we started to act like the United States of America instead of some third world country.”
instead of some marxist-fascist-statist country.
Posted by: foggy | November 14, 2011, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Tmferretti, Your comparison of GDP Of Illinois and Michigan to Italy and Greece might
sound more reasonable if both states were not so buried in debt. Illinois has over 85
billion dollars in unfunded Pension liabilities and most of the state contractors wait over
a year to be paid. You can go through many areas in both of those states that look
like a bombed out third world country. Sorry, but we are a nation on the decline.
Posted by: deadwrestler | November 14, 2011, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
FOGGY and DEADWRESTLER
I disagree; we are not a nation in decline. We are still the strongest nation in the world both economically and militarily. We can buy into this notion that we should settle for third world status (as the corporations want for a cheap labor market) or we can get to work and do something instead of focusing on the distraction of the deficit.
90% of Americans say the biggest issue is jobs, and they are absolutely correct. If we can get the economy moving again and the unemployment rate down to 3 or 4 % the debt and deficit will be a non-starter.
We need to quit cringing every time the Chinese and Europeans f–rt. Moodys downgraded our bonds, the world hardly took notice and our economy actually grew a little and the unemployment rate went down slightly.
Americans are the ones that drive the world economy, we need to debate jobs, instead of fiddling around doing nothing debating the meaningless debt and deficit, and we should start with out-sourcing that has cost us more jobs than anything else. We can settle for a lower standard of living hence low wages and bring those jobs back. Not me, we need to penalize companies that out-source period.
Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Posted by: tmferretti—We are not a nation in decline, we are simply uncompetitive in the global market. There was an interview this weekend with MI former gov Granholm, she had a conversation with the Electrolux people, they were going to close their factory and move it to Mexico, MI put everything on the table including a new factory and 20 years tax free, Electrolux said matter of factly that no matter what MI did they just couldn’t compete with the $1.57 and hour Mexico pays and moved. The trick to Globalization is not doing what 4 billion people will do for far less than you will accept being paid, it isn’t that complicated. Or we withdraw from the WTO, and all the free trade agreements and put tariffs on imports. The United States has far more people than its economy needs, the world has far more people than the economy needs, there is nothing this or any government can do to alter that fact.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | November 14, 2011, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
SNEWSOM2997
Yes, I saw Granholm too. Your right she did everything she could to make Electrolux stay except one thing. She could have said, if she were the Federal government, “ok if you won’t accept the tax breaks and other incentives I gave you. I’ll tax the hell out of you and make sure none of your products come into this country without a stiff tariff” I’ll bet that would have got their attention.
I’m not willing to work for a 1.57 an hour and I’m just guessing not many other Americans would either. The corporations have demonized the unions, the government and now they’re trying to convince the middle class we should become a third world country. This is even better for them; it will save them the cost of relocation and ensure a cheap labor pool.
Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
SNEWSOM2997
Did you see the part where she told the Chinese official that it would be years because of politics before we would get an energy policy in this country and he rubbed his hands in glee. This just goes to show, not going green and eliminating the Department of Energy is insanity. Oh by the way, I consider nuclear green, especially the non-waste pebble reactors they use in South Africa.
Posted by: tmferretti | November 14, 2011, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
The audacity of STUPIDITY by his majesty.
Obama told a group of CEOs today that the United States has gotten “lazy” and that America lost its hunger in promoting itself in a global marketplace.
“We’ve been a little bit lazy over the last couple of decades. We’ve kind of taken for granted — ‘Well, people would want to come here’ — and we aren’t out there hungry, selling America and trying to attract new businesses into America,” he told the CEOs who are gathered on the sidelines of the annual Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) meetings, which the United States is hosting this year in Hawaii..
LETS ALL HOPE IDIOT OBAMA’s supporters get lazy and stay home on election day in November 2012 !!
Posted by: Carol Stamati | November 14, 2011, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
Here we go again. Screw the people part two. Are the republicans and the democrats really foes, or in many cases, just co-conspirators? So far the proposals being floated – count off the books war costs as the reduction to defense cuts, make Bush tax cuts for the filthy rich permanant, lower taxes further for corporations and the rich, slash and burn social security, medicare benefits. The scenerio is quite familiar, (as when they first tried to pass obamacare in the middle of the night on christmas eve) create an artificial emergency deadline, pass a horrific bill on a holiday (thanksgiving) and as Nancy Pelosi once said “you will have to pass it to know what is in it”. God help us. Please pass me the vasoline!
Posted by: jay | November 17, 2011, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm