Nov 28, 2011 3:10pm

Rick Santorum Hits Newt Gingrich on Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants

Just days after Newt Gingrich won the endorsement of the New Hampshire Union Leader, one of his rivals sat down with another Granite State newspaper. Rick Santorum met with the editorial board of the Nashua Telegraph Monday for an hour and was asked about Gingrich’s comments on immigration at last week’s CNN and American Enterprise Institute debate.

At the debate, Gingrich voiced a moderate approach to illegal immigration saying he would not remove all illegal immigrants that are currently in the country.

“I do not believe that the people of the United States are going to take people who have been here a quarter century, who have children and grandchildren, who are members of the community, who may have done something 25 years ago, separate them from their families, and expel them,” Gingrich said last Tuesday.

Santorum told the Nashua paper,  ”the principal thing we need to accomplish is securing the border.”

“I think amnesty–and do I believe what Newt is suggesting is amnesty?” Santorum asked the moderators. “Well, even he said after the debate the other night that millions of people would be able to stay in this country as a result of this proposal. I don’t know what you call amnesty. Does amnesty only mean full citizenship or does it mean you are forgiven for your transgressions and you are allowed to stay here under some status? If that’s amnesty then that’s clearly what Newt is suggesting.”

Although the Union-Leader’s endorsement could help Gingrich with more conservative Republicans in the state–voters Santorum needs—the former Pennsylvania senator actually saved his harsher criticism for Mitt Romney, who in a WMUR/UNH poll released last week had 42 percent support in the state. When asked about comments Romney made in a 2006 Bloomberg interview that he also supported a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants in this country, Santorum said the change in position is “just another Romney-ism.”

“This is just another Romney-ism of being in one place when the issue is whether he is running in Massachusetts and he’s taken a more moderate position or a more liberal position (and) now as he’s running for the Republican party nomination in a conservative Republican primary he has transformed himself into a much more ardent conservative,” Santorum said, adding that he has a “pretty solid conservative record” on illegal immigration.

Santorum also criticized President Obama, calling him “as partisan and divisive as any president we’ve ever seen.” He accused the president of “playing politics” with the supercommittee and “poison(ing) the well” to make it harder for the bipartisan committee to make a deal on cuts to reduce the deficit.

“The president of the United States is the leader of the country and the president of the United States did virtually nothing to encourage and facilitate any kind of deal there. He traveled around the country preaching class warfare and taxing the rich,” Santorum said. “In key swing states using taxpayer dollars instead of doing the hard work of working with the relevant parties and trying to craft a deal.”

Santorum spent the weekend campaigning in New Hampshire and has two campaign events there Monday. Tomorrow, he will be in Duluth, Ga., at the Georgia Republican Party 7th District Presidential Forum.

 

User Comments

I don’t understand why Santorum is being ignored by conservative voters. We now have 2 not-Romney candidates, one rising and one falling who are serial adulterers. Is family values only a meaningless phrase?

Posted by: Max Fenster | November 29, 2011, 12:31 am 12:31 am

They don’t really care about morals/family values as they profess in order to get votes, but merely about beating Obama ie, POWER.

Posted by: genhrules | November 29, 2011, 11:43 am 11:43 am

This country needs a President that is ONLY interested in protecting the interests of American citizens and the Rule of Law. Americans are short-changing themselves if they vote for a candidate who is not.

Posted by: shirley | December 3, 2011, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Newt’s solution is not acceptable and amounts to anarchy. We have laws that corrupt politicians and corrupt businessses do not want to honor. What next? Pick a law and decide what ones to honor and what ones to ignore? I challenge Newt (as well as the 3 men who in no way represent me in Congress — Frank (no 2nd amendment rights for you) Lausenberg, Roberto ‘Mr. Chain Migration’ Menendez and ‘Ramadan’ Rush ‘to make them all legal’ Holt) to tell me how illegal immigration and the 20+million illegals have made my life better. Higher taxes to pay for all of the free benefits for these idiots, less jobs for legal American citizens, less safety as they murder 4,000 citizens per year, less education for American students as we take precious resources to teach the children of illegals how to speak English, more expensive health and hospital costs to pay for illegal aliens who don’t pay anything…..all so these politicians can buy votes for themselves with my tax dollars. I wish I could have the same representation and support in Congress that the illegals do.

Posted by: Lois | December 7, 2011, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Santorum is the real conservative – he has walked the walk, lived the life. Romney needs to get the tap as he can beat Obama, but Santorum should be along for the ride to keep Mitt honest.

Santorum does NOT get enough media, that is absolutely correct.

Posted by: Peter | December 8, 2011, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Rick has my vote, Newt needs to go crawl under a rock, not worthy of the nomination.

Posted by: catt | December 13, 2011, 8:22 am 8:22 am

Rick has my vote, Mitt and newt are really liberals,if bachmann wasn’t for cuuting veterans benefits she would have my vote.

Posted by: catt | December 14, 2011, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.