Nov 1, 2011 3:22pm

Romney Camp Dismissive of Ponzi Accusations

The Romney campaign today denied a published report that alleges the presidential candidate and his eldest son have business connections to three individuals who were once accused of being involved in an $8.5 billion Ponzi scheme.

The report by the liberal blog Think Progress claims that Tagg Romney helped create a financial firm named Solamere Advisors with three executives from the Stanford Financial Group, a company that was seized by the U.S. government in 2009 after the Securities and Exchange Commission accused it of being “a massive Ponzi scheme.”

Tagg Romney told Think Progress that his partners — Tim Bambauer, Deems May, and Brandon Phillips — have been cleared of charges.

 Think Progress, however, claims that those charges are still being adjudicated.

Solamere Advisors, according to the piece, is a subsidiary of Solamere Capital, which was founded by Tagg Romney and was invested in by his father as well as the Romney campaign’s National Fundraising Chair Spencer Zwick, who now serves as a managing partner at the firm.

A Romney campaign spokeswoman was dismissive of the article.

“It’s not surprising that a left-wing blog with a highly partisan agenda would publish false material as it relates to Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney has no ties to the Stanford Financial Group or any of its activities,” said campaign spokeswoman Andrea Saul.

Tagg Romney spoke to Think Progress earlier this month in Las Vegas and said that he had been aware of the accusations against his partners.

“Before we invested in them, they were in that. But they were cleared of that before we made our investment,” Tagg Romney said.

Tagg was also asked about any profits his business partners may have made in the scheme, to which he told ThinkProgress: “They probably made, their pay there was like $15,000 total. Those guys got totally screwed by the whole thing. It almost ended their whole careers because they moved all their clients over [to the Stanford Financial Group], and then the place was shut down two months after they moved their clients over. They hadn’t made any money yet. They had bonuses and everything promised to them, but they didn’t make any of their money. So they made no money.”

But according to Think Progress, Tagg Romney’s account isn’t entirely accurate: “According to documents reviewed by ThinkProgess using the Pacer search engine, charges against Tim Bambauer, Deems May, and Brandon Phillips have not been dropped. A recent court filing shows May requesting the court for arbitration instead of going to trial. ThinkProgress also spoke to the deputy clerk for the federal District Court in Dallas, and confirmed that the three men are still defendants in the lawsuit to recover the Ponzi scheme money.”

ThinkProgress also alleges, citing a court-appointed audit of the Stanford Financial Group, that the three partners also profited far more than Tagg Romney suggested

Solamere Capital issued the following statement later today:

“It is inaccurate to suggest that Solamere Capital made an investment in this firm. Solamere Capital was approached to invest in a new wealth management firm being launched by these three individuals.  After extensive due diligence, Solamere Capital decided not to invest because the business was at an early stage and did not meet our investment criteria. 

“However, Spencer Zwick, Tagg Romney and Eric Scheuermann each own a minority stake in the business as individual investors.” 

 

 

 

SHOWS:

User Comments

Guilty by allegation! It’s the new norm for the Right to use against the Left, so turnabout is certainly fair play…………….

Posted by: Searambler | November 1, 2011, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Obama and his people give billions more of taxpayer money to just-about-to-fail “energy” companies. How ’bout we cover what the president’s been up to? Hmmmm

Posted by: s | November 1, 2011, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Mitt Romney & his business partners need to give the Stanford victims back their money. The 3 Stanford executives received almost $2M for selling the fraudulent CDs to unsuspecting retirees, and have been sued by the Receiver to return those funds to the victims, instead of investing them with the Romneys & contributing to Mitt Romney’s campaign!

Posted by: Stanford victim | November 1, 2011, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Mitt Romney & his business partners need to give the Stanford victims back their money. The 3 Stanford executives received almost $2M for selling the fraudulent CDs to unsuspecting retirees, and have been sued by the Receiver to return those funds to the victims, instead of investing them with the Romneys & contributing to Mitt Romney’s campaign!

Posted by: Stanford victim
____________________
Maybe Obama can give back the money to the taxpayers that he invested in Solyndra. I’m sure we can declare the taxpayers “victims” too.

Posted by: spike | November 1, 2011, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Guilty by allegation! It’s the new norm for the Right to use against the Left, so turnabout is certainly fair play…………….

Posted by: Searambler
______________
Nice try Searambler!

Your party seems to be desperate these days which is why this story on Romney came about. It will be a bit hard for the left to make these charges stick, however, now that Obama has Solyndra to answer for.

Posted by: ivan | November 1, 2011, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

It will be a bit hard for the left to make these charges stick, however, now that Obama has Solyndra to answer for. Posted by: ivan | November 1, 2011, 4:49 pm.

LOL! As usual, rather than refute the charges, you (as in someone on the Right) instead try to deflect the focus away from YOUR guy and onto Obama, for a completely unrelated situation. One that has absolutely nothing to do with this story. And FYI, Solyndra hasn’t been accused of being a giant ponzi scheme, so even your lame attempt at deflection completely misses the mark. This story isn’t about Obama. Why is it so bloody hard for y’all to stay focused on the story at hand?!?!?

Posted by: Searambler | November 1, 2011, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

The right has accused President Obama of everything under the sun. Now when some of their own tactics are turned on them (not by democrats, but by the republican candidates themselves) they begin whining and moaning. I think both sides need to see these accusations for what they are, attempts to gain political points. We democrats have put up with the birther issue, Solyndra, Fast and Furious (Wide Receiver), blah, blah, blah. If the republicans insist on continuing to use these tactics it does nothing for our country and clouds the important issues of jobs and getting this economy moving again.

Posted by: tmferretti | November 1, 2011, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

The right has accused President Obama of everything under the sun. Now when some of their own tactics are turned on them (not by democrats, but by the republican candidates themselves) they begin whining and moaning. I think both sides need to see these accusations for what they are, attempts to gain political points. We democrats have put up with the birther issue, Solyndra, Fast and Furious (Wide Receiver), blah, blah, blah. If the republicans insist on continuing to use these tactics it does nothing for our country and cloud the important issues of jobs and getting this economy moving again.

Posted by: tmferretti | November 1, 2011, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

tmferretti –

It would help to have someone running the country that actually understood an economy or what it takes to create jobs and balance the budget. Obama, while a smart and great guy, doesn’t understand those things. He would be a righteous president in good economic times but is in way over his head for where we are right now. Unfortunately, you cannot spend unlimited amounts of money to favor the majority of who elected you and then pay it off on the backs of those who are wealthy. Entitlements need to go, pet projects need to go, all the money that is thrown towards the unions and trade groups need to go, wasteful programs (think govt trying to play venture capitalist) needs to go…The President unfortunately has too many people that are trying to control him to get what they want. I would imagine voters will say next November that He needs to go.

Posted by: T | November 1, 2011, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

This allegation by Think Progress is terrible journalism by someone who doesn’t understand much other than finding something they wanted to find. The court papers they refer to are related to the receivership from Stanford Financial. The three brokers that were involved have claims for the money tied up that they were promised as well, so they haven’t been paid either, as Tagg Romney explained. Think Progress quotes an attorney for general investors who would have a competing claim – not a credible source. Combined with the ridiculous diagram they put together trying to tie Romney to Stanford, it would be laughable if it wasn’t so dishonest in grabbing headlines.

Shame on Think Progress and ABC – be careful with recirculating this mess, it is bad work.

Posted by: tea412 | November 1, 2011, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Why vote for someone that would take and place criminals in his cabinet. Obama did it, Bush did it, Romney would do it, Cain would do it, Perry would do it and Bachman would do it too! I find it hard to trust politicians but if I had to trust one it would be Ron Paul. I may not agree with him completely but he has shown one thing the others will never have, INTEGRITY!!!

Posted by: Berlin Veteran | November 1, 2011, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

There all a bunch of crooks. Two wings of the same bird flying in the wrong direction. Ron Paul or Bust!

Posted by: GreatScott | May 3, 2012, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.