By Julie Phelan

Nov 9, 2011 12:01am

Six in 10 Support Policies Addressing Income Inequality

Six in 10 Americans say the federal government should pursue policies to reduce the gap between the wealthy and less-well-off Americans, although fewer express support for the Occupy Wall Street movement that’s been protesting U.S. income inequality.

Sixty-one percent in this ABC News/Washington Post poll think the wealth gap is larger than it’s been historically. And despite longstanding public concerns about activist government, six in 10 also say the federal government should seek to reduce that differential.

The public’s concern is buttressed by a recent Congressional Budget Office estimate that the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans have nearly tripled their incomes since 1979, while the bottom 80 percent of earners have seen their share of the nation’s total income slightly decline.

This poll, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates, finds that 37 percent perceive the wealth gap as “much larger” than it’s been; just 5 percent think it’s smaller. And 43 percent feel “strongly” that the government should pursue policies to address it, versus 24 percent who are strongly opposed.

Overall support for such policies is linked to perceptions of a widening wealth gap. Among those who think the gap is much larger than it’s been historically, 84 percent say the government should pursue policies to address it. That declines to 54 percent among people who think the gap is just somewhat larger than in the past, and 41 percent of those who think it’s about the same.

Support for specific policies presumably would depend on the details. On one hand, 75 percent in an ABC/Post poll in October supported raising taxes on millionaires. On the other hand, the public in general favors “smaller government that provides fewer services” over a larger government that does more – by 56-38 percent in September.

Additionally, while 60 percent support polices to address wealth distribution, substantially fewer, 44 percent, identify themselves as supporters of the Occupy Wall Street movement, and just 18 percent strongly so. About as many, 41 percent, say they oppose the movement.

GROUPS – These views vary by partisanship and ideology. Seven in 10 Democrats and 65 percent of independents think the income gap is larger than it’s been, compared with 45 percent of Republicans. Even more Democrats, 81 percent, think the federal government should act to address the gap, as do nearly six in 10 independents but just 37 percent of Republicans.

Similarly, 73 and 67 percent of liberals and moderates, respectively, think the gap has grown, compared to slightly fewer than half of conservatives. Eighty-four percent of liberals think the government should be doing something about this issue; that declines to a still-substantial two-thirds of moderates, then to 49 percent of people who say they’re somewhat conservative, and just 29 percent of “very” conservatives.

There are more than just partisan and ideological divides. Better-educated and higher-income Americans are more likely to think the income gap is wider now than in the past – but less likely to think the federal government should act to address it. Sixty-four percent of Americans without a college degree favor such policies, compared with 53 percent of graduates. So do 70 percent of lower-income Americans, compared with 52 percent of middle- and higher-income earners.

TEA vs. OCCUPY – Overall support for the Occupy Wall Street movement, at 44 percent, is nearly identical to support for the Tea Party movement (43 percent, with 44 percent opposed). But the support profiles of these groups vary in expected and unexpected ways.

Republicans and Republican-leaning independents account for 65 percent of Tea Party supporters; just 27 percent are Democrats or Democratic leaners. It’s essentially the opposite for Occupy Wall Street supporters – 69 percent are leaned Democrats; 24 percent, leaned Republicans.

Ideologically, Occupy Wall Street shows more diversity. More than half of Tea Party supporters, 57 percent, identify themselves as conservatives; just 13 percent are liberals. By contrast, Occupy Wall Street supporters include sizable shares of moderates (42 percent), liberals (31 percent) and conservatives (26 percent) alike.

Occupy Wall Street supporters are more racially diverse – three in 10 are non-white compared with one in five Tea Party supporters – and they’re also somewhat more apt to earn less than $50,000 a year. A quarter of strong Tea Party supporters are over the age of 65, vs. about half as many Occupy supporters.

MOTIVATIONS – Occupy Wall Street and Tea Party supporters differ in political views as well. In one example, just 24 percent of Tea Party supporters approve of Barack Obama’s overall job performance; that jumps to 63 percent among Occupy supporters.

Nearly three-quarters of Occupy Wall Street supporters say the wealth gap is larger than it’s been, compared with 54 percent of Tea Party supporters, and just 42 percent of its strong supporters. And eight in 10 Occupy supporters want the government to do something about it, far more than the number of Tea Party supporters who say so, 42 percent.

Still, these groups have some things in common. For one, anger at the government peaks among strong supporters in each group. In the Tea Party ranks, 39 percent describe themselves as angry at the way the government is working, and that soars to 55 percent among “strong” supporters. Fewer Occupy supporters, 28 percent, express anger at the government; but among its strong supporters this, too, grows, to 40 percent.

Indeed there’s another point of similarity between these movements, and perhaps an unexpected one: More than a third of Tea Party supporters say they also support the Occupy Wall Street movement – and vice versa.

METHODOLOGY – This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by telephone Oct. 31-Nov. 3, 2011, among a random national sample of 1,004 adults, including landline and cell-phone-only respondents. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points for the full sample. The survey was produced for ABC News by Langer Research Associates of New York, N.Y., with sampling, data collection and tabulation by Abt-SRBI of New York, N.Y.

User Comments

“Occupy Wall Street supporters are….somewhat more apt to earn less than $50,000 a year. A quarter of strong Tea Party supporters are over the age of 65, vs. about half as many Occupy supporters.” ummmmm younger and just starting out their careers = less income. Brilliant deduction, Watson.

Posted by: deanbob | November 9, 2011, 7:13 am 7:13 am

Wow, the survey had an even income distribution —– not.

Posted by: deanbob | November 9, 2011, 7:24 am 7:24 am

“Overall support for such policies is linked to perceptions of a widening wealth gap. Among those who think the gap is much larger than it’s been historically, 84 percent say the government should pursue policies to address it. That declines to 54 percent among people who think the gap is just somewhat larger than in the past, and 41 percent of those who think it’s about the same”.

This is the problem I have with polls like this. There is no “perception” of a widening wealth gap. It is REAL. It is MEASURABLE. It is QUANTIFIABLE. Relying on people to answer these things based on their own particular faulty perceptions is meaningless, IMO. If the pollsters asked them, “SINCE the wealth gap is larger than it was in the 1920′s, before the Great Depression, and it is RIGHT NOW at a historically wide margin, do you support government policies to address it?”, then we would get a truer reading of how people really feel about the REALITY of the wealth gap, not how they feel about their own particular, often faulty perception of the wealth gap…..

Posted by: Searambler | November 15, 2011, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

SEARAMBLER: Well said.

…and now I must get ready for my 15 thousand dollar a year job that took me 4 years of college, 2 years of grad school, and one year of specialized training to prepare for…

(PRAY I have enough gas to get there today. Payday is Thursday… I might pawn this computer again.)

The realities I just listed are things those who, let’s face it, got rich off the backs of Africans, Chinese, Native Americans, Swedes, and Irish (among other groups) don’t wanna look at, and the only “ethnic” identity that the rich WASPY set might identify in me is that I’m 3/4 of Russian heritage.

Do they know what it’s like to have half of their neighbors move out and then people occupying those housing units a few months later, basically a “rotating neighbor list,” and then to have a bunch of cockroaches move in with you after said neighbors move? And then not have enough money to get rid of said roaches?

Do they know what it’s like to explain to their child’s school that you will “pay on thursday” for their kids, whom their threatening to not feed at lunch anymore because I don’t qualify for a free lunch for them (my wife and i “make too much”) and so their teachers are basically paying for them?

Do they know what it’s like to walk into a dark room, only to realize you didn’t replace that lightbulb last night when it burnt out, and you just plain didn’t have five bucks to go and buy more?

Do they know what it’s like to have to do all their laundry in a laundromat, which is horribly expensive, because they can’t get the money together for a washer and dryer, and on days when you can’t afford this, it’s Febreze and Lysol on your clothes?

Do they know what it’s like to skp a meal (I usually eat once a day near payday), and at dinner teling your kids “no honey, Dad already ate.” while giving them the actual food you bought?

Do they know what it’s like to eat hotdogs and ramen noodles four days in a row, or to have as your only entertainment cable TV (if you criticize me for havin cable, trust me, it’s my only luxury, I used to be able to afford FOUR vacations a year, one out of the country), and you try to get them excited about “Tonight’s episode of Walking Dead” … oh sorry, didn’t pay the bill, I’ll call them tomorrow and promise to pay on Thursday.

I’m not angry I’m poor. I’m angry I CAN’T get ahead.

Posted by: Cory | November 29, 2011, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Since “Occupiers” don’t believe that there should be an income difference between people, how is it that they justify the income THEY receive even though they do not work for the money that is donated to them? I think Occupiers need to Occupy the Occupy movement. I want some of that money donated to them, given to me… now how are we going to make that happen?

Posted by: Thor | January 30, 2012, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.