Cheney Blasts Obama for Failure to Act on Downed U.S. Drone
Former Vice President Dick Cheney blasted President Obama Monday for his handling of the downed U.S. drone in Iran, saying he should have destroyed the drone immediately to protect U.S. intelligence.
“The right response to that would have been to go in immediately after it had gone down and destroy it,” Cheney said told Erin Burnett of CNN’s’ “OutFront”
Cheney said the president had three options on his desk but rejected all of them. “They involved sending somebody in to try to recover it or, if you can’t do that, and admittedly that would be a difficult operation, he certainly could have gone in and destroyed it on the ground with an air strike,” he said.
“But he didn’t take any of the options. He asked nicely for them to return it. And they aren’t going to do that,” Cheney said.
The president said Monday that the United States has asked for the drone back. “We’ll see how the Iranians respond,” Obama said.
Instead of returning the drone, Cheney said the Iranians will likely “send it back in pieces after they’ve gotten all the intelligence they can out of it.”

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Is this Neocon getting blood to his brain? In light of the last decade of HIS plans in Iraq and Afghanistan, we should listen to HIS advice about attacking or sending troops into Iran? Go away.
Posted by: green.goddess | December 13, 2011, 11:24 am 11:24 am
What Cheney is saying breaks international law. Though I’m sure they’d have had no problem starting WWIII.
Posted by: lexingtonlady | December 13, 2011, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Cheney’s so dumb it’s a miracle he walks upright. First off, we didn’t know for sure where the thing went down. We lost track of it. Second, we don’t know for sure if the Iranians caused us to loose track of it. Which means, we didn’t know for sure if they were able to landed the thing in the middle of a well protected area. To immediately send in a recovery force means illegally sending in special forces into sovereign territory. They could be captured, or killed off entirely. Plus, look at the time they’d have to spend on the ground trying to either recover it, recover parts from it, or blow it up. They’d be there for hours. Doesn’t this idiot think it’s a big enough incident as it is getting caught flying a stealth spy plane over sovereign territory. What a freaking war-mongering neo-con. It’s no wonder why the U.S. is so unpopular these days with jerks like this getting into positions of power.
Posted by: Fred | December 13, 2011, 11:34 am 11:34 am
I can’t comprehend an intelligence goldmine the magnitude of this downed drone not being rigged with explosives in case the aircraft becomes disabled, or by being hijacked by breaking the code of the navigation system.
Posted by: Jim Harrison | December 13, 2011, 11:41 am 11:41 am
To the comments stating that we can’t go get it/destroy it since it would be a violation of international law as Iran is a sovereign country…Obama did the same thing when he authorized the Navy Seals to capture/kill Osama…does that make Obama a “neocon” also?
Posted by: Sean | December 13, 2011, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Cheney: ““The right response to that would have been to go in immediately after it had gone down and destroy it,” – - – And exactly how does Cheney know whether or not that was even possible? Please Mr. Cheney, provide some PROOF that what you are claiming and implying was and is even possible! All of the public reports said the controllers LOST CONTACT with the drone! Then it was was what, three days before they knew the Iranians might have recovered something? What part of LOST CONTACT does Cheney not understand? Lost contact means the controllers had no contact of any kind with the drone and therefore they necessarily DID NOT KNOW WHERE IT WAS OR ITS CONDITION. Now, precisely how would Cheney – or anyone else – “go in immediately after it had gone down and destroy it”IF they did not know where it was, especially when it was two or three days before they even knew there might be something left worth destroying? So, unless Cheney knows something for a fact that is not public knowledge he is doing nothing more than engaging in petty rabidly partisan criticism about something that is not even possible according to the public reports. Unless Cheney knows some facts that WE don’t know then he is essentially lying by insisting that the President should have done something that might not have even been possible then or now. – - – Cheney: “Cheney said the president had three options on his desk but rejected all of them.” – - – Again Mr. Cheney, where is your PROOF? How do you know this? And,were those options given to the President on the condition that we know where the friggin drone is actually at? If those options were contingent on knowing the drones precise location then how convenient for you to have left out that little detail. Do we know PRECISELY were the drone is so we can even attempt to recover it or destroy it? Did we ever? And if so, what is Cheney’s proof that we knew it and could have destroyed it? I have not seen any reports stating that we do in fact know EXACTLY where the drone is or that we ever knew that. So, do we even know exactly where it is with sufficient precistion to attempt to destroy it with an air strike or Tommahawk strike? Every caption I have found for the picture says the photo was taken at “an undisclosed location.” What part of undisclosed location does Cheney not understand? So, one more time, if we don’t know precisely where the drone is, and if we NEVER knew precisely where the drone was, how could we have destroyed it then or now? And if Cheney does know that we ever had that precise location then why does he not tell us how he knows and where it was to confirm that his criticism of the President is the least bit valid?
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | December 13, 2011, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Just a thought (and this is not giving excuses for this President to use) but is it possible that this is technology that we “want” Iran to have? Maybe I have watched too many “Mission Impossible’s” but I thought there was a self-destruct (or button to destruct) mechanism on all this stuff? I would think it terribly naive for the President to believe that Iran would return such technology and that such an overture is more “window-dressing” if anything else to convey “whatever” to the international community. Who knows what is in all of this stuff that could possibly wreck Iran’s technology. Or, the technology could be outdated and poses no national threat. Or, it could be what it is… a big oops!
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 13, 2011, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Obama has done very well with foreign policy. He isn’t afraid to use force when it’s appropriate and he isn’t afraid not to use force when it is not appropriate. Give him credit for making intelligent decisions, he has in the past. The CIA is having an extremely difficult time in Iran lately. Cheney is not on the inside any more. He doesn’t know jack.
Posted by: sameagain | December 13, 2011, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
SEAN: “To the comments stating that we can’t go get it/destroy it since it would be a violation of international law as Iran is a sovereign country…Obama did the same thing when he authorized the Navy Seals to capture/kill Osama…does that make Obama a “neocon” also?” – - – Good grief. NO, the two situations ARE NOT THE SAME! Is it really that difficult to understand that when we got Bin Laden we were NOT attacking Pakistan? Is SEAN really so clueless to not know that we were ALREADY operating in Pakistan when we got Bin Laden? Is SEAN really so clueless to not know the Bin Laden mission was done in part from a base WE were using IN Pakistan? Is it really that difficult to understand the difference between these two situations – attacking a country (Iran), and attacking a PERSON (Osama) who was inside of a country (Pakistan) from inside of the same country (Pakistan again) from which we were already engaging in military operations (Pakistan again)? Destroying the drone would necessarily by definition require an attack on Iran. Attacking Bin Laden was NOT an attack on Pakistan. Plus, how is this lost drone situation any different from the P3 that we lost in China? We asked the Chinese to return our plane and people. IF international law/treaties and/or standard protocols require countries to ask for the return of military equipment and personnel that is accidentally lost (i.e. the P3 and this drone) as I believe is the case then asking for the drone’s return is the legally correct thing to do. And if we never knew where it was and still don’t know where it is with sufficient precision to destroy it then we really don’t have any other alternative. Besides, how do you or Cheney KNOW for a fact that we are not doing anything about trying to recover it or destroy it? How many Repubs/conservatives were saying the President was not doing anything or enough to get Bin Laden before we got him? It is pathetically stunning how often people whine and complain and criticize about things for which they have ZERO knowledge about what is really happening.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | December 13, 2011, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
“What Cheney is saying breaks international law.”
The left has celebrated assassinations by Obama so we will ignore your hypocritical criticisms. Forever.
Posted by: foggy | December 13, 2011, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Satan speaks
Posted by: dan | December 13, 2011, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
FOGGY: “The left has celebrated assassinations by Obama so we will ignore your hypocritical criticisms. Forever.” – - – Killing “unlawful enemy combatants” (i.e. terrorists who are waging and leading a war against us) is NOT and assassination – by definition. By BUSH’S AND CHENEY’S defintion. Why is that when Bush was killing them and capturing them and torturing them (or enhanced interogating them depending upon how one defines torture) and locking them up indefinitely without a trial or Geneva Convention protections they were “unlawful enemy combatants” and so it was okay to do those things? Why is that when Bush was killing them they were “unlawful enemy combatants” so it was okay to kill them and it was NOT an assassiation, but when President Obama does the same thing it is an assassination? Okay, we will now ignore YOUR hypocrisy. Forever.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | December 13, 2011, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Yes I agree with Chaney! Obama has been playing paddy cake with the Iranians for the last 3 years!
We should bomb all the Iranian nuclear sites until they are just a rubble pile!
Posted by: BIG JIMMY | December 13, 2011, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Cheney’s know’s better then this. This Drone is nothing more then a chemical delivery system, it’s made up of a chemical, in many circles, is known as SaltPeter. It’s used to surpress Male Argor. We simpley found it the best way to protect 10 year old boys in the muslin culture
Posted by: brianklbw | December 13, 2011, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
@B-K KnightRider
Show us the definition of assassination that does not include al-Awlaki?
Posted by: foggy | December 13, 2011, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Is this Neocon getting blood to his brain? In light of the last decade of HIS plans in Iraq and Afghanistan, we should listen to HIS advice about attacking or sending troops into Iran? Go away.
Posted by: green.goddess | December 13, 2011, 11:24 am 11:24 am
————————————————————————————————-
and you and your radical left wing extremist would rather we “pull” a Jimmy Carter and Kowtow to the iranians and embolden them more Thats How Clinton was responsible for 911, When a team of special ops were in place to take out bin laden and Clinton said no (just ask ABC and the unedited version of the path to 911)…..Obamas plan is coming together perfectly huh?Let the Iranians Block the stait of hormuz and drive up the price of gasoline so no one will be able to work
Posted by: Save the birds | December 13, 2011, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Way to go, Obama…. nice job….
This is exactly what the world needs… a potentially nuclear armed Iran with this type of delivery technology. great.
(But I get it… you asked for it back, nicely. So you did everything you could be expected to do. Blame it on Bush and move on…)
come on 2012!
Posted by: GA_Man | December 13, 2011, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Whats the “unedited” version of the Path to 911…Something ABC is hiding? can i find it on the internet?
Posted by: Timothy | December 13, 2011, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Yes I agree with Chaney! Obama has been playing paddy cake with the Iranians for the last 3
years! We should bomb all the Iranian nuclear sites until they are just a rubble pile! POSTED BY:
BIG JIMMY
*****Good Job “BIG JIMMY”. Known for the big muscles and very little brain. What would have
happened if Iran had a drone flying in our country. All hell would have broken loose, with nuts like
“Chaney”…I mean, Cheney, stirring this country into WWIII.
Posted by: michael | December 13, 2011, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
About Brianklbw’s comment. It makes sense, with a massive spread of SaltPeter in the Iranian community, it’s sure to protect 10 year old boys in those muslin communities
Posted by: Frank | December 13, 2011, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Dummmycrat Debbie Wasserman:::: Unemployment has not gone up under president Obama.. LMAO
How ignorant is she, and how did ABCDNC not report on this LMAO …oh Yeah we know, they are too busy covering up Obama growing scandals, Solyndra, lightsquared, Fast&furious, MF-Global
OBAMA____________VS___________AMERICA
Posted by: Yep I said that | December 13, 2011, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Don’t get in a “lather”, Cheney haters…… We probably would have had a stealth bomber in there and out before the Iranians knew we were there!! — Please understand our capabilities before you rant about WWIII… gesh!! —– Obama’s LACK of a decision lost a TON of stealth and drone technology to Iran, China, and Russia…. you don’t think they will share??
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | December 13, 2011, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
POSTED BY: B-K KNIGHTRIDER | DECEMBER 13, 2011, 11:47 AM===It was reported that they knew where the drone landed and even had satellite imagery showing where it landed. They even estimated the amount of damage to the drone from the marks it made in the surface. Where have you been?
Posted by: wact1 | December 13, 2011, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Why in the world would I or anyone believe the architect of the WOMD lie that killed thousands of my fellow soldiers and those of our allies.
Posted by: MTATL67 | December 13, 2011, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
So says the man who should be on trial for treason for outing a federal intelligence agent for political payback. As if we could just hop on our brooms, have a magic destruction spell of the drone. Real military operations are not so simple, Darth Cheney.
Posted by: Troy Wood | December 13, 2011, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
The president said Monday that the United States has asked for the drone back. “We’ll see how the Iranians respond,” Obama said.
Sounds like
A p p e a s e m e n t Policy
full speed ahead.
Posted by: Noz | December 13, 2011, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
… we didn’t know for sure where the thing went down. We lost track of it. Second, we don’t know for sure if the Iranians caused us to loose track of it.
Posted by: Fred | December 13, 2011, 11:34 am 11:34 am
====
Given that Cheney has all blood in his hand for his actions causing 4500 american soldier lives, 100000s iraqis, and $1T for the war in Iraq, he is actually correct on this one.
You think that $600+B were all wasted by Penatta (well, lots of it)???? If Apple could track you down to the centimeter accuracy with merely a small device call i-something, you think that drone had not even a homing beacon?? B0 should’ve sent in a guided bomb and had it evaporized – you’ve already invaded their airspace once. On a separate thought, why the hell these morons running the drones don’t have a secondary system to get this thing destroyed on the way down – again a simple Apple device would be sufficient.
Our Greatest Smartest Clueless Leader was so fortunate to have you clueless supporters to get him elected.
Posted by: doodoo | December 13, 2011, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
What a disaster. Asking??? Oh boy. I have to agree with….Perry. Obama did the worst choice possible over this.
Posted by: trish | December 13, 2011, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Posted by: Noz | December 13, 2011, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Wow, that took me 3 times to get the above posted.
I didn’t realize the “A” word was blocked by the ABC filter.
Posted by: Noz | December 13, 2011, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
POSTED BY: B-K KNIGHTRIDER | DECEMBER 13, 2011, 11:47 AM===It was reported that they knew where the drone landed and even had satellite imagery showing where it landed. They even estimated the amount of damage to the drone from the marks it made in the surface. Where have you been?
Posted by: wact1
We finally found something that Barry won’t send a drone after. A downed drone in Iran.
Posted by: foggy | December 13, 2011, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Last week a conservative “think tank” mapped out a Right Wing notion of how Iran should be contained beyond President Obama’s diplomatic efforts and economic sanctions:
“The keystone of any containment policy is a military strategy of deterrence.”
Such as growing the US nuclear arsenal and “a large and persistent conventional covering force” in the region, “capable of assured regime change.”
Oh, and the report also mentioned this containment policy would “hardly be a cost-free policy.”
Good luck saber rattling to a “clueless” nation plagued with long term unemployment, weary of war, and deeply in debt after a decade of GW Bush neocon borrowing.
Posted by: green.goddess | December 13, 2011, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Cheney and his control over President Bush and US policies/direction as well as his blindness to the consequences of his actual and proposed actions will in my opinion will eventually have him recorded as one of the most dangerous men in history. So glad he is no longer a heart beat away from the presidency. The least the American voters should do is make sure we don’t elect into office a president that is so weak that they bring in and depend on the advice of such people and not even recognize the disasters being created around them. We cannot afford to again spend all our resources recovering from such disasters of that era.
Posted by: John | December 13, 2011, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Maybe if Obama bows before the Iranian leadership and says pretty please, they will give it back!
Obama’s foreign policy has been based on sheer luck not skill and now his luck has run out!
2012 can’t come soon enough!
Posted by: BIG JIMMY | December 13, 2011, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
We need our drone back. It is our American Property and this freaking iranians have no freaking authority or right over it.
Posted by: HILL | December 13, 2011, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
We need our drone back. It is our American Property and this freaking iranians have no authority or right over it.
Posted by: HILL | December 13, 2011, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Green.Goddess Last week a conservative “think tank” mapped out a Right Wing notion of how Iran should be contained beyond President Obama’s diplomatic efforts and economic sanctions:===We all know how well Obama’s diplomatic efforts and sanctions are working out…….What a joke.
Posted by: whining liberal | December 13, 2011, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
@Noz and Foggy – The word you find blocked has been used as a synonym for cowardice since WWII. Surely you can use something less provocative.
I’ve actually heard the word repeatedly used on neocon vox TV to encourage armed or military action in international relations. Just what we need, more war. One more reason to vote Republicans in Congress gone.
Posted by: green.goddess | December 13, 2011, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Obama: “pretty please with a cherry on top give the drone we illegally sent into your territory back, we have loads of secret technology and intel on it about where we want to bomb you next year with our other Obama drones it is our american property”
Iran: “don’t worry, Walmart will have it on display on their shelves by Christmas so everybody can have one”
hahahahahaha
Posted by: Mark | December 13, 2011, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Mr. Intelligence Failure Cheney speaks his mind. Sure we’ll listen to you Cheney, after your major intelligence failures on 9/11 and weapons of mass destruction.
Posted by: Dean | December 13, 2011, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Obama’s policy of granting concessions to potential enemies to maintain peace is what I mean.
Posted by: foggy | December 13, 2011, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
The key to President Obama’s so called “successes” have largely been the result of drone attacks! (You could argue is these Presidential assignations were legal) The President has error in judgement to share the key to his “success” to people who want to destroy American society will more than offsets the Presidents “successes”!
Posted by: Common _ Sense | December 13, 2011, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
WACT1: “POSTED BY: B-K KNIGHTRIDER | DECEMBER 13, 2011, 11:47 AM===It was reported that they knew where the drone landed and even had satellite imagery showing where it landed. They even estimated the amount of damage to the drone from the marks it made in the surface. Where have you been?” – - – I have been right here. The problem with those reports, at least every quote/report I have been able to find, mentioned “wreckage” and supposedly having a satellite over the “crash site.” So, since the drone obviously did NOT crash any report or quote mentioning “wreckage” or a “crash site” are not reliable. In other words, every quote/report I have seen and heard has been ambiguous about what we actually knew with certainty. I have NOT yet seen or heard a reliable report confirming that we did in fact know precisely where the drone LANDED, instead of crashed. Since Cheney did not explicitly confirm anything and since I don’t know anything with a reasonable degree of certainty I am reserving my judgment and criticism. Generally, I don’t reactively pass judgment or criticize others on the basis of flimsy evidence or in the absence of reliable evidence. I did the same for Bush so President Obama deserves no less.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | December 13, 2011, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
whining liberal | December 13, 2011, 1:55 pm posted: “We all know how well Obama’s diplomatic efforts and sanctions are working out…….What a joke.”
Who are “we”? The latest IAEA dust up uses data before 2004. It vaguely goes on to say progress in Iran MAY HAVE GONE ON. No evidence whatsoever.
Ongoing Right Wing neocon pressure promoting a military response in Iran is the “joke”.
And, Senator Ron Paul, hardly a “whining liberal”, dismisses this fearmongering about Iran having nuclear weapons – He clearly states it is the United States aggressive policies that are the cause of all the hatred that we face around the world.
I would love to see Senator Paul is the Republican candidate – the nation deserves a refreshingly educational debate about international policy and the underpinnings of a global financial disaster.
Posted by: green.goddess | December 13, 2011, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
POSTED BY: B-K KNIGHTRIDER | DECEMBER 13, 2011, 2:39 PM===Fair enough but it could crash and still survive with major structural pieces still intact. I believe it is referred to as a crash landing.
Posted by: wact1 | December 13, 2011, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Is Obama a lunatic. By asking Iran to return the drone. US just delivered the drone to Iran as a gift. how remarkable it is. Iran being a 3000 year old civilization did not even had the decency to say “Thank You”. Bloody Barbarians…
Posted by: Karim | December 13, 2011, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
It’s been a tradition since George Washington I believe, that the outgoing President leaves an envelope on the next Presidents desk outlining the major problems that the new President will face.
When Bill Clinton left, he told George Bush that the biggest threat to the United Sates was terrorist groups like El Qaeda and that he was conducting drone strikes in Afghanistan in order to eliminate the threat.
George Bush discontinued the drone strikes on the advice of Dick Cheney who thought the strikes were alienating the Arab oil producing countries. We saw what happened.
Politic should end at the water’s edge; Cheney has no credibility in foreign policy whatsoever. His biggest interest was making sure Halliburton was awarded no bid contracts.
Posted by: tmferretti | December 13, 2011, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
“Obama’s policy of granting concessions to potential enemies to maintain peace is what I mean.” – Foggy
Wasn’t that Neville Chamberlain’s foreign Policy?
Posted by: Noz | December 13, 2011, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
“Wasn’t that Neville Chamberlain’s foreign Policy?”
You think Newt sees Churchill when he looks in the mirror?
Posted by: foggy | December 13, 2011, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Cheney is correct.The drone is a goldmine and a key to our current stealth technology.Yes,we do have the assets to destroy it ,but not the will to protect information that has taken years,dollars and yes lives to obtain.It was the same thing with the stealth helicopter lost in the bin Laden raid. For crass political purposes the chickenhawks in the White House put men in danger and compromised security procedures for a totally unnecessary operation when 2 JDAAMs could have accomplished the same thing-without publically humiliating Pakistan and leading to the current mess that will only make the war against terrorism even more difficult.Was a corpse worth sending our most sensitive stealth technology to Beijing? Because the loss of this drone is a direct result of the bin Laden raid.How else could the Iranians have tracked it?
Posted by: Nephron | December 13, 2011, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
I understand it’s a pretty bad situation for USA. However, we need to think about a hypothetical situation: A drone from another country crashes inside USA while it was trying to spy on USA. Would USA have taken it lightly? Would USA return that? Would USA allow the other country to bomb inside USA to destroy their drone?
Dick Chenney is a nut case. In his world he can dominate everyone, every country in this world, where he is the supreme authority. He is above all the law.
Posted by: Robert Frost | December 13, 2011, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Funny, I thought Darth Cheney descended into the pits of hell long ago. It’s amazing that he can survive on a Grinch-sized heart. (The ‘before’ Grinch, not the ‘after’). Two sizes too small……………….
Posted by: Searambler | December 13, 2011, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
I think we’re really lucky to have escaped eight years of Cheney being in charge with only two wars. I guess he did enough for his buddies at Halliburton with Iraq and Afghanistan………
Posted by: Searambler | December 13, 2011, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Why does anyone think that Cheney’s opinion of what Obama should do is relevant, meaningful, or noteworthy? It’s a given that no matter what Obama does, Cheney will be against it. Cheney is out. He’s gone. He’s a private citizen living out his life on the countries dime. His opinion is as meaningful as that of Kim Kardashian………..
Posted by: Searambler | December 13, 2011, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
His opinion is as meaningful as that of Kim Kardashian………..
POSTED BY: SEARAMBLER | DECEMBER 13, 2011, 4:20 PM =====or yours
Posted by: allen | December 13, 2011, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
“His opinion is as meaningful as that of Kim Kardashian………..” – RambleOn
and yet more pertinent than Barry Obama’s
“You think Newt sees Churchill when he looks in the mirror?” – Foggy
Huummmmm . . . . does Newtie smoke Cigars?
“@Noz and Foggy – The word you find blocked has been used as a synonym for cowardice since WWII. Surely you can use something less provocative.” – GreenieGlob
I avoid hypersensitivity like the disease it is.
Posted by: Noz | December 13, 2011, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Cheney’s health looks to be failing fast – near death in the face. It is too bad he won’t live to be tried for crimes against humanity.
He is a despicable excuse for a human being. He will likely return back to this earth someday as a cockroach. I will step on him.
Posted by: James Brenner | December 13, 2011, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
There is only one candidate offering peace and an end to wars. His name is Ron Paul. You know what to do.
Posted by: Dan | December 14, 2011, 2:17 am 2:17 am
Mr Cheney should remember what a big mess he, Mr. Bush and Mr. Romsfeld left when they left the office. Now he is calling for another and a bigger mess.
One drone down is not a big deal to start another war and having family’s with body bag of loved ones.
Posted by: farhang | December 14, 2011, 6:21 am 6:21 am
Dick Cheney go back in your hole where you belong.
Posted by: Thomas Succok | December 14, 2011, 10:07 am 10:07 am
That robot warrior looked in pristine shape looks like someone (Russia, China, Iran) took control and landed it no problem. If so this whole new billion dollar robot army is kaput as a weapon of selected destruction.
Which would be a good thing, man I dislike robots Big Time!
Posted by: Dave | December 14, 2011, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
WHAT?!?!!??!??!!? That would have broken international laws!!! It went down in IRAN!! I AM surprised that there is no remote controlled “destruct” button or something like that in case of something like this.
Posted by: pksk531 | December 14, 2011, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Can you believe that this drone was delivered quite nicely and deliberately to the Iranians?! Hard to believe it, but Obama has just handed over military technology to the “enemy.” I believe that is an executable offense. The drone did not crash, it was landed with minimal damage and not self-destructed, the normal course of action should we lose something as valuable as this.
Posted by: christoph | December 14, 2011, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
@ Dave, I agree with you wholeheartedly, it was indeed deliberately guided and landed on Iranian soil by someone in immediate control of the drone. My guess is, that since the control codes are encrypted with nearly unbreakable code, it was deliberately guided to where it was landed on authority of those answerable to the president. It was not an accdient or malfunction as we will discover. And, as I said, this is an act for which individuals have and should have been executed. Even the president is not immune to compromises to our national security as this incident surely has been. He needs to be held accountable, and like the other Hussein, suffer the consequences of his traitorous actions.
Posted by: Christoph | December 14, 2011, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
What about Cheneys interest in Haliburton and his desire for the contract for the gas pipeline in Iran?
Posted by: kyle | December 14, 2011, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Didn’t Cheney and Bush apologize to China? So Cheney’s comments are irelevant and all these news agencies should be ashamed of themselves to even bother publish them.
Posted by: Mike | December 14, 2011, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Wait, what? I thought Cheney was dead LOL!!!! okay. well i guess not. :D Either way he’s a freaking lunatic. o_O
Posted by: comment0r | December 15, 2011, 6:15 am 6:15 am