Clinton Is Latest US Official to Raise Eyebrows in Israel
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has become the latest senior U.S. official to raise eyebrows for her criticism of Israel.
During a closed-door address Saturday to a think-tank conference on the Middle East, Clinton said she was concerned about the state of democracy in Israel, citing draft legislation that opponents say would place controls on the media and inhibit political opposition, according to Israeli media reports.
Israel’s Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz rejected Clinton’s characterization and called her remarks “absolutely exaggerated,” according to the Associated Press.
The State Department declined to confirm Clinton’s comments because they were meant to be off the record, but did tell reporters that the United States does have concerns about the proposed laws.
“We just feel that any type of legislation that might hinder, you know, any civil society would raise concern,” deputy spokesman Mark Toner said. “But, again, we’re confident that Israel has a vibrant democracy, has the types of institutions that can address these concerns.”
At the same conference a day earlier, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta offered a blunt criticism of Israel’s role in the stalled Mideast peace process. “Just get to the damn table, just get to the table,” he said when asked about what Israel should to restart negotiations.
“The problem right now is we can’t get them to the same table, to at least sit down and begin to discuss their differences,” he added.
The U.S. ambassador to Belgium, Howard Gutman, last week also irked Israel supporters when, during a conference in Brussels, he distinguished between traditional anti-Semitism and that which comes from Muslims who, he said, only hate Israel because there is no peace deal with the Palestinians.
The State Department today distanced itself from Gutman’s comments, but said it did believe criticism of Israel was not inherently anti-Semitic.
“The ambassador was expressing his views on an issue,” Toner said, adding that there were no plans to recall the ambassador from his post.
Gutman, a top fundraiser for President Obama’s 2008 campaign who is also Jewish, issued a statement this weekend apologizing.
“I strongly condemn anti-Semitism in all its forms,” he said. “I deeply regret if my comments were taken the wrong way. My own personal history and that of my family is testimony to the salience of this issue and my continued commitment to combating anti-Semitism.”

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Why the heck is Israel so sacrosanct. They are a country like any other, not flippin Shangri la. If America was a parent Israel would be the spoiled child that is need of a darn good spanking. Talk about one country that is taking us for granted and has come to see our monetary aid as an entitlement.
Posted by: MTATL67 | December 5, 2011, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
oohhhh…..Is she against censorship and oppression? ANY KIND? What about that ugly SOPA mess they are trying to lock-up the United States with? And what difference does it make if it’s off the record or not… a hypocrite is still a hypocrite.
Posted by: I&A | December 5, 2011, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Abuse US officials start waking up to the apartheid system they are running under the term of “reliigion”. They are not allies! They only want free money from the US so they can keep their apartheid system going! Even U.S. Ambassador Howard Gutman pointed it out today and what does Israel do as usually whine and cry Anti-Sem……….. GROW UP!!! US doesn’t need them as allies or friends!
Posted by: Shlomo the Homo | December 5, 2011, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
“Why the heck is Israel so sacrosanct.—-Israel is not sacrosanct, but it only has to lose a war ONCE. If they are depending on Obama and his ilk, they are in bigger trouble than they know. IMHO, Obama, Clinton, etc. aren’t brave enough to criticize the Muslims, who won’t even tolerate a political cartoon. (Obama would rather bow to them than criticize.) The hobnail boots following the silk slippers up the stairs won’t be the Israelis; it will be the Muslims and it will be brutal.
Posted by: jonnie | December 6, 2011, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
MTATL67 – “If America was a parent Israel would be the spoiled child that is need of a darn good spanking.” If America was a parent Israel would be the child being bullied by other kids in the neighborhood, including receiving death threats from some. And you think the parent should be punishing that child?
Posted by: MyTake | December 7, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
so i suppose that the jews were responsible for the arabs jihad against them before the 20th. century nation of Israel
Posted by: g55rumpy | December 7, 2011, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm