Democrats Slam Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney for ‘Martini Lifestyle’ Ahead of Iowa Debate
As Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney prepare to take center stage Saturday in the ABC News Iowa presidential debate, Democrats are honing a new line of attack against Gingrich’s leadership while intensifying their months-long offensive against Romney’s character.
The move – coming through a series of Web videos, press conferences, and television interviews – signals an attempt by supporters of President Obama to aggressively define his two most likely challengers and, in doing so, fan the flames of an internal GOP debate.
“The Republican Party has split into two parties: the tea party and the martini party,” chief Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod told Bloomberg this week, offering his spin on the Gingrich-Romney divide. Axelrod said the dynamic could mean a protracted primary fight, which many say could be advantageous to Obama.
Earlier this week, Axelrod launched the first direct Democratic attacks on Gingrich, labeling him the “godfather of gridlock” for his role in the federal government shutdown of 1995 and the partisan battle to impeach President Bill Clinton.
“He really has been the champion of gridlock,” Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz repeated Thursday. “He made sure polarization was the name of the game here in Washington.” (Schultz did not mention, however, that there were notable bipartisan legislative achievements under Gingrich’s tenure in the House.)
The DNC also opened a new chapter in its playbook against Romney with a political memo and Web video – “Mitt Romney Through the Ages” – chronicling the former Massachusetts governor’s shifting policy positions and concluding that he suffers from “multiple political personality disorder.”
Still, as the Democratic messaging machine pursues Gingrich and Romney separately, strategists from the Obama campaign to the White House are continuing to paint all Republicans on the campaign trail and in the halls of Congress as cut from the same cloth.
“Neither of the frontrunners really understands the needs of the middle class,” said a senior Democratic strategist in characterizing how the party was preparing to bracket the ABC Iowa debate.
“Romney got rich at Bain by laying off middle class American workers and shipping jobs overseas, and Gingrich is sort of the $60,000-a-speech influence peddler. He didn’t have to be a lobbyist because he was making so much money,” the strategist said.
“They are doing and saying whatever they can to win over the tea party vote, but they have both come from this ‘martini lifestyle’ where they don’t understand the problems of middle-class Americans and aren’t offering policies that respond to them.”
A spokeswoman for Romney has called the focus on his campaign by Democrats an effort to distract voters from Obama’s economic record, and a sign that Romney is considered the most formidable threat.
Three new Quinnipiac polls in the battleground states of Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania show Romney and Obama neck-and-neck in a hypothetical 2012 match-up, with Romney holding a slight edge in Florida and Pennsylvania.
But Gingrich isn’t far behind. In the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll of Iowa caucus goers, the former speaker of the House scores evenly with Romney as the best candidate to beat Barack Obama.
In the Quinnipiac Ohio poll, Gingrich holds a narrow edge over Obama, while in Florida and Pennsylvania he trails but stands within two points and eight points, respectively.
“I’m going to stay positive, I’m going to talk about how we solve the country’s problems. And I have one opponent: Barack Obama,” Gingrich said Thursday when asked about attacks from his GOP rivals and Democrats.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Let’s set the record straight, Clinton left us with a surplus economy,The previous Republican administration created the economic crisis of 3/4 of the present debt and put us in the economic crisis we are in today. Gingrich got paid over a million dollars as a consultant in the foreclosure market. Whose calling the “Kettle black”?
Posted by: Louis | December 9, 2011, 7:22 am 7:22 am
Hey Devin. Two months ago, you were writing about how Cain and Romney, Were the biggest threats to Obama. Now Gingrich and Romney? Do you have a single original thought? Do you just watch Hanitty and take notes?
Posted by: Jeremy | December 9, 2011, 7:44 am 7:44 am
I love how stupid these rich democrats are, they’re trying to make it seem like they know all about the middle class life when in reality they’re are just as wealthy as the republicans.
Posted by: Ryan | December 9, 2011, 8:12 am 8:12 am
This is so stupid. I didn’t know that the US had a class system. Oh yeah, now we do. The government has paid the upper-class for screwing up (TARP, the bail-outs, “To big to fail”), pays off the lower class and gives people taxpayer money to not work for two years. Of course they have to appeal to the middle-class because we are the ones getting screwed! The best way to appeal to the middle class is to provide a way to get us out of this class system that has been created. Equal taxes, equal benefits. Give the “middle-class” a chance to be upper-class and don’t stand in the way of the “upper-class” becoming the “lower class”. The Obama administration has created an environment where ONLY the middle-class CAN fail. There are safety nets for everyone else.
Posted by: Will | December 9, 2011, 8:49 am 8:49 am
“Let’s set the record straight, Clinton left us with a surplus economy.”
Posted by: Louis | December 9, 2011, 7:22 am 7:22 am
Wrong. That’s a long-running lefty myth.
Clinton never had a budget surplus. Trust funds were borrowed to make it appear the government had income. In other words, the myth was based on an accounting trick. The reality is the national debt NEVER WENT DOWN under Clinton. Even in Clinton’s best year, there was a $17.9 billion deficit. (Source: US Treasury Department).
Democrats never had any problems with Bush’s spending. They did, however, often complain loudly that he didn’t spend nearly enough.
Bush’s tax cuts increased federal revenues, all of which were spent and then some. Just like they were during the Reagan years. Democrats gleefully participated in deficit spending during both presidencies. They took deficit spending to hysterical levels when they controlled both chambers of Congress under Obama. Obama increased the national debt from $10 TRILLION to $15 TRILLION in less than three years–an insane 50% increase.
Posted by: Chuck | December 9, 2011, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Martinis. Hahahaha.
Nancy Pelosi’s net worth skyrocketed 62% in 2010 to $35.2 million. She’s a Progressive Democrat who takes campaign money from labor unions but doesn’t bother using union labor for her own multi-million dollar vineyards. Too expensive. She’s one of the wealthiest members of Congress.
The reaction from Democrats? *CRICKETS*
George Soros made BILLIONS from the 2008 financial sector meltdown. He doubled his net worth last year. He’s one of the top 50 wealthiest people on the planet.
The reaction from Democrats? *CRICKETS*
Both Pelosi and Soros are clearly in the top 1% if not the top 1/10th of the top 1%. Anybody see any OWS protesters in either of their front yards? Yeah, me neither. I wonder why that is.
Posted by: Chuck | December 9, 2011, 9:27 am 9:27 am
Posted by: Chuck | December 9, 2011, 9:27 am 9:27 am
What? Democrats are shameless hypocrites? I’m shocked!
Posted by: Susan | December 9, 2011, 9:44 am 9:44 am
“I love how stupid these rich democrats are, they’re trying to make it seem like they know all about the middle class life when in reality they’re are just as wealthy as the republicans.”
If only. I don’t know where the money went…
Posted by: John Corzine | December 9, 2011, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Yeah right! Obama and the Democrats care about working people in America??? The facts tell a different story! The Obamacrats have done nothing except enrich themselves while the economy remains in the toilet. All they’ve cared to do is create more government jobs and spend more and more on government programs. Newsflash!! Most people do not work for the government!!
Posted by: Brian | December 9, 2011, 9:48 am 9:48 am
–Anybody see any OWS protesters in either of their front yards? Yeah, me neither. I wonder why that is.–
I blame Bush.
Posted by: Lefterd | December 9, 2011, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Barry has been a little ###### since axelplouffe made him threaten to postpone his vacation so he might look like a leader.
Posted by: foggy | December 9, 2011, 10:00 am 10:00 am
POSTED BY: LOUIS | DECEMBER 9, 2011, 7:22 AM 7:22 AM your spin is priceless, you credit Pres.Clinton with a surplus under REPUBLICAN in the senate but you blame the REPUBLICANS for the collapse under DEMOCRATS ruling majority.
Posted by: Lizzie | December 9, 2011, 10:07 am 10:07 am
ABC, is the race toward thew Republican primary the only political news? Why don’t you include stories about the president’s speech? Covering for his lies?
Posted by: deanbob | December 9, 2011, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Where is the coverage of Jon Corzine, head of MF Global? You know, one of Obama’s large contributors and fund raisers and can’t explain where billions $$$$ went? When Enron imploded, you were all over them link stink on excrement. How many of their execs went to jail (hint: 3), How many Wall Sr exec (responsible for 2008 financial crisis) have even been jailed?
The MSM is so blatantly covering up as much negative press as possible that could possibly effect Obama as possible.
Posted by: deanbob | December 9, 2011, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Posted by: deanbob | December 9, 2011, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Not too many stories about about the former governor of Illinois either…
Posted by: (D) | December 9, 2011, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Goldman…. too big to fail…. Corzine… too big to jail. The newest protected class.
Posted by: Michelle Shu Jas | December 9, 2011, 10:29 am 10:29 am
“I’m not in a position, given the number of transactions, to know anything specific about the movement of any specific funds,” said Corzine. Why can’t Corzine or Holder (Fast and Furious) just tell the truth? Is it a political requirement that one be able to not tell the truth?
Posted by: deanbob | December 9, 2011, 10:32 am 10:32 am
I’d like to see more coverage on the bill to make Congressional insider trading illegal. Anyone notice how few from either party are talking about this. All of us need to press for laws/rules changes to require Congress follow all of the laws and rules that the normal citizens are required to do. Increase Congressional pay, but eliminate all of their retirement benefits – and maybe the concept of “civil service” will return?
Posted by: deanbob | December 9, 2011, 10:39 am 10:39 am
USA today Thursday, Gas prices push more to drive less. See something Obama planned
has worked. He stated In running for President,energy Prices would rise under his plan.
Tom Kloza chief Analyst at oil price information, said that people realized that by Columbus day this year, that they had spent just as much money on fuel as the year before. The average price for gas this year will end at$3.50 the highest yearly average
ever. See Obama has kept his word, and the democrats have drove everyone to a
Martini lifestyle, although most of us cheap beer or wine.
Posted by: deadwrestler | December 9, 2011, 10:44 am 10:44 am
If Barry will pledge to not pardon Rezko, Blago, Holder or Corzine then I will vote for him.
Posted by: foggy | December 9, 2011, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Eric Holder on Fast&Furious..Lying is just a state of mind..The misssing guns will be used in crime for a long time
John Corzine: I am puzzled as to where the money went….MF Employee.. Bill Clinton received $50,000 a month
Obama yesterday: we do not need a reason to party
Obama WH. The shooting at Fort Hood was “work place violence”.. hmmmmmmm.. “workplace” violence….Sunni OR Shia??????
Keystone pipeline……What’s a couple hundred thousand jobs when I have an election to win
*note to my radical left wing media accomplices.. DO NOT COVER ANY OF THIS
OBAMA__________VS_________AMERICA
Posted by: Yep I siad that | December 9, 2011, 10:46 am 10:46 am
I don’t care what kind of sick lifestyle Newt Gingrich has…. he won’t win. It doesn’t matter how many wives he has abandoned and how many child support payments he’s skipped out on. Neither will Romney. They are both cartoon characters. If the GOP wanted an actual conservative candidate rather than a new mascot for Team Wall Street, they would back Ron Paul….. but Wall Street knows there is no money to be made off the American taxpayer in a Ron Paul presidency, so, surprise! They hate him more than they hate Obama. They just treat that poor guy like he doesn’t even exist. He could be polling in the high 70s and they would still ignore him.
The Washington-Wall Street alliance is fundamentally out of touch with America. Sure, they might put up a feisty Republican with a nice twang in his voice and a folksy way of sticking up for the banks… but everyone is sick of them. The only people that support them anymore are senile old people, religious extremists, bigots, and bankers. A good half of the “supporters” you see on the web are probably just paid hacks trying to create the impression that the constant conspiracy theories they push have merit.
Posted by: blip | December 9, 2011, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Posted by: deanbob | December 9, 2011, 10:39 am 10:39 am
————————————————————————————-
Democrat left wing radical congresswoman from NY is trying to strip this bill (insider trading) of all enforcement
Posted by: The OBama water carrier network | December 9, 2011, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Did you hear about the Seattle doctor and his wife, who live in a $1.2 million waterfront home, are accused of filing false claims to collect more than $100,000 in welfare payments? Inspectors visited the home at least nine times since Lyudmila Shimonova (doctor’s alleged wife) moved in — yet none of the officials reported the possibility of fraud. Altogether, Shimonova received $135,000 in housing assistance. Inspecoers recorded all those things but never reported any suspicion about fraud, according to the Seattle Housing Authority. SHA employees conduct the yearly inspections of any property that receives HUD dollars and can and do report fraud, but didn’t in this case.
Posted by: deanbob | December 9, 2011, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Posted by: blip | December 9, 2011, 10:50 am 10:50 am
If you’re so sure the GOP won’t win and everyone is so sick of them, why are you wasting so much of your time this morning posting your comments? In your view they’ll lose, so what’s the point of obsessing about it? Don’t you have anything more productive to do like enjoying the magical hope and change that Obama brought you?
Posted by: Susan | December 9, 2011, 11:07 am 11:07 am
“There are all kinds of operations going on right now in the Justice Department about which I know nothing because of the way the Department of Justice is structured,” – apparatchik eric holder reveals that the DOJ is structured like Tony Soprano’s operations.
Posted by: foggy | December 9, 2011, 11:11 am 11:11 am
“I don’t care what kind of sick lifestyle Newt Gingrich has…”
If he was a Democrat you would be one of his toads.
Posted by: foggy | December 9, 2011, 11:13 am 11:13 am
I don’t care what kind of sick lifestyle Newt Gingrich has…. he won’t win. It doesn’t matter how many wives he has abandoned and how many child support payments he’s skipped out on. Neither will Romney. They are both cartoon characters. If the GOP wanted an actual conservative candidate rather than a new mascot for Team Wall Street, they would back Ron Paul….. but Wall Street knows there is no money to be made off the American taxpayer in a Ron Paul presidency, so, surprise! They hate him more than they hate Obama. They just treat that poor guy like he doesn’t even exist. He could be polling in the high 70s and they would still ignore him….
Posted by: blip | December 9, 2011, 10:50 am 10:50 am
That newt gingrich, former speaker of the house, lobbyist, is somehow the “outsider” suddenly in the eyes of some diehard republicans is proof of how kooky and brainwashed those people are. And that the religious right would vote for him is phenomenally hyprocritical. If I were a GOP candidate I’d give Gingrich’s dirty laundry a high-profile airing out.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 11:16 am 11:16 am
If he was a Democrat you would be one of his toads.
Posted by: foggy | December 9, 2011, 11:13 am 11:13 am
But since he’s Republican, you’re his toad? Nice. Never mind Newt Gingrich’s erratic management style,arrogance, insider status, lobbying past, willingness to sell himself out, serial cheating, serial hypocrisy, gimmicks, and flip flopping. A toad will be a toad.
Glad you’re willing to put that out there so clearly through partisan projection.
You can’t make this craziness up.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 11:26 am 11:26 am
“And that the religious right would vote for him is phenomenally hyprocritical.”
You say hypocritical like it’s a bad thing and not a required trait of moral relativists.
Posted by: foggy | December 9, 2011, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Don’t worry Kimberly, I am positive all the news sites you visit will give blow by blow
details. I will tell you this much, from the Library of congress Thomas database
you can find out that Newt co-sponsored 418 bills together while in congress with Nancy Pelosi over their 12 years together. that alone kills my vote.
Posted by: deadwrestler | December 9, 2011, 11:33 am 11:33 am
“Never mind Newt Gingrich’s erratic management style,arrogance, insider status, lobbying past, willingness to sell himself out, serial cheating, serial hypocrisy, gimmicks, and flip flopping. A toad will be a toad. ”
Aw c’mon Kimberly. Just imagine he’s Bill Clinton and you won’t see any of those flaws.
Posted by: foggy | December 9, 2011, 11:35 am 11:35 am
I just hope Obama can still win despite his horrible performance so far. Thanks for all of you defending Obama’s big spending and big government ideas, which are the only way to go at this point.
Posted by: LexingtonLady | December 9, 2011, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Kimberly, I know your heart is in the right place, but your head is not. You basically spamming these blogs with the same posts over and over is not productive. We both want Obama to win, but please be a bit more sensible and discreet. Thanks.
Posted by: LexingtonLady | December 9, 2011, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Foggy, so you hug hypocrisy… makes sense why you’d be a willing and eager toad for a Newt then, yeah?
As for the rest of your claims, but, but, but, but, but Bill!!! sigh… Partisan toads… they can’t help but project themselves onto others as some sort of bizarre justification for their lack of compass outside of party.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Obama should be compelled to testify under oath about Solyndra and about Fast & Furious. Then it’s on to impeachment, after he lies about his involvement in both. But if not, he’ll be beaten like a cheap drum come next November. Believe me, the Republicans, and many millions of Independents (many of whom supported Obama last time) will be plenty enthusiastic to replace the empty windbag and crooked “community organizer” known as Obama.
Posted by: RiskyBusiness | December 9, 2011, 11:53 am 11:53 am
“Kimberly, I know your heart is in the right place, but your head is not. You basically spamming these blogs with the same posts over and over is not productive. We both want Obama to win, but please be a bit more sensible and discreet. Thanks.”
POSTED BY: LEXINGTONLADY
LOL, and KACHING! The truth from her own side of the fence. I don’t post that much at all, but every blog I encounter has “KIMBERLY” on it with her repeated posts. Time to get a life outside of pumping out stale propaganda.
Posted by: RiskyBusiness | December 9, 2011, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Lexington Lady?
How many times and personalities do you try to get away with?
lol.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Deadwrestler,there appears to be quite a lot coming from Mitt, Ron Paul and libertarian-oriented blogs and news sites.
Democrats prefer Newt as the political opponent.
Since I care about the country,I think Mitt is the better option. Put two good,capable and reliable candidates up and see who wins. I’d like to see Ron Paul run as an independent,too.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
I post here a decent amount, although it just depends on my real life outside of ABC, but yes, Kimberly, is being “counter-productive” with her ceaseless rants and repetitive rambles on every comment section. I know it’s been that way for a very long time, and will continue to be so. I guess it’s funny or sad, depending on one’s point of view. I view it as sad.
Posted by: Barb | December 9, 2011, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Time to get a life outside of pumping out stale propaganda. Posted by: RiskyBusiness | December 9, 2011, 11:57 am 11:57 a
Oh,look a sock puppet show.Cute.
And you talk about getting a life? Clue: I can hear the croaking….
Do you imagine the show is persuasive to someone?Anyone?
Too funny.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Foggy, so you hug hypocrisy… makes sense why you’d be a willing and eager toad for a Newt then, yeah?
As for the rest of your claims, but, but, but, but, but Bill!!! sigh… Partisan toads… they can’t help but project themselves onto others as some sort of bizarre justification for their lack of compass outside of party.
Posted by: Kimberly |
Saultastic!
Posted by: foggy | December 9, 2011, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Obama is very clearly a sorry failure in almost every way. I confess that I was not the brightest bulb either, since I voted for him. Sorry that Kimberly is devoting her “life” to still defending him, evidently 24/7, lol. Oh well, she’s not the first to waste boatloads of time on crazy bs. Some people just can’t admit they were wrong, and move on to find something better to do.
Posted by: Maurice | December 9, 2011, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
John Bolton to Newt Gingrich: Focus on nomination before appointingme secretary of state…
Newt is definitely arrogant and presumptuous. He’s making appointments before the first primary!
Posted by: Courtney cousin | December 9, 2011, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
but Wall Street knows there is no money to be made off the American taxpayer in a Ron Paul presidency, so, surprise! They hate him more than they hate Obama.
Posted by: blip | December 9, 2011, 10:50 am 10:50 am
That’s really funny. Wall Street doesn’t hate Obama. They have made RECORD PROFITS since Obama took office. He demonizes them in speeches, yet behind closed doors he gives them a wink and a nod. Why do you think the press isn’t allowed in his $35,000 a plate campaign events? He doesn’t want to be seen sucking up to these people. But it IS happening.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | December 9, 2011, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
WHERESMYMONEY, I sure hope you are not insinuating that Obama is crooked hypocrite, lol times 10.
Uh wait, that’s the bald truth — he is a crooked hypocrite. Points for you. But not for Mr. Teleprompter.
Posted by: Maurice | December 9, 2011, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
I’d like to see Ron Paul run as an independent,too.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Of course you would. ANYTHING to take votes away from the Republican candidate.
I’d like to see Hillary run as an independent.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | December 9, 2011, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
“WMM”, Hillary really isn’t independent. But,whatever– sure,a few truly independent candidates that break up the establishment grid and open up options.
Newt Gingrich is an extraordinarily huge step backward for the GOP… and since the GOP is roughly half the country, the country. The Democratic party evolves… slowly,but it evolves.The GOP has failed to evolve. It has failed. The lame GOP field of candidates is proof.
That newt gingrich, former speaker of the house, lobbyist, is somehow the “outsider” suddenly in the eyes of some diehard republicans is INSANE. And that the religious right would vote for him is phenomenally hyprocritical. If I were a GOP candidate I’d give Gingrich’s dirty laundry a high-profile airing out.
No wonder the GOP is so unpopular and so out of step with America.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Yawn! Who are you trying to convince? Yourself?
Posted by: Mary | December 9, 2011, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
“No wonder the GOP is so unpopular and so out of step with America.”
POSTED BY: KIMBERLY
How many times have you posted that sentence? 100 times? 200?
How many times have you posted full posts repeatedly with no change, or only the very slightest of word changes? Several hundred?
Please get a grip on your obsession to spam and cut-and-paste.
It is hurting our cause, seriously.
Posted by: Barb | December 9, 2011, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
“Mary,” —the puppet show continues…what is it they say?Only the truly boring rely on expressions of boredom as conversation. Particularly in a puppet show.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Barb, it is fewer than the number of names you have posted under,that’s for sure,and fewer than the number of times Newt and Mitt have flip flopped on issues of import to the American people.
No need to concern troll about my “cause.”
It truly is no wonder the GOP is so unpopular. They are out of touch with America.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
No wonder the GOP is so unpopular and so out of step with America.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
WASHINGTON) — President Obama’s uphill battle to re-election is getting steeper.
A report released Wednesday by the centrist think-tank Third Way showed that more than 825,000 voters in eight key battleground states have fled the Democratic Party since Obama won election in 2008.
“The numbers show that Democrats’ path to victory just got harder,” said Lanae Erickson, the report’s co-author. “We are seeing both an increase in independents and a decrease in Democrats and that means the coalition they have to assemble is going to rely even more on independents in 2012 than it did in 2008.”
Posted by: wheresmymoney | December 9, 2011, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
The lunatics at Daily Kos think their ideas are “mainstream” and “popular” too.
Posted by: Mary | December 9, 2011, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
“Barb”— How often do you whine about others’ posts?
Have you read Goodbye to All That: Reflections of a GOP Operative Who Left the Cult by Mike Lofgren?
Check it out.
Meanwhile,Newt’s biography includes three wives, cheating, a $300,000 fine for ethics violations– the first time that EVER happened to a speaker of the House– and a $250,000-plus charge account at Tiffany. Gingrich has flip-flopped and floundered on issues from health-care reform to climate change to Libya to the Middle East — and he recently has said a lot of stupid stuff regarding child-labor laws. He is erratic and has been described as a managerial disaster.
And his ego is legendary.
Most Republicans couldn’t stand him till very recently. He only is getting attention because all the other flavors of the month flamed out.
No wonder the GOP is so unpopular and enthusiasm is on a downslope. The truth may hurt you, but I will speak truth to ignorance regardless.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
“The truth may hurt you, but I will speak truth to ignorance regardless.”
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Ignorance is what got Obama elected. It doesn’t take a lot of intelligence to vote for meaningless tripe like Hope and Change.
Posted by: Mary | December 9, 2011, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Posted by: wheresmymoney | December 9, 2011, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Obama is an underdog,for sure.Look at the mess he inherited and the hit job the right did on him. But he’s becoming less and less of an underdog if you look at 2010 to now and how much has changed. The GOP botched an opportunity to evolve and offer a good presidential candidate to the people. Or even a generic Republican that the people could rally around.Americans don’t like Newt. Heck,half of the right wing doesn’t like Newt. Both Newt and Mitt are uninspired and uninspiring choices. That’s just the truth.Honest Republicans will tell you that. And neither can be trusted for slightly different reasons. Peggy Noonan wrote a piece about how disturbing Newt is and why. She claims he’s inspiring,too….but to whom? The same type of kooks that loved Sarah Palin and think she’s a genius. The people who know Newt do not want him to get the nomination.That’s telling.
I don’t want anyone in the Republican field to win, so I say,bring it on.Nominate Newt. But don’t expect to be able to pretend it was all a horrible mistake in ’14. You will just be repeating the McCain crazy temperament thing,but worse. Americans get that Obama is much more trustworthy than Newt. They just do.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Well,Mary, erraticism and arroganceis what got McPalin NOT elected and your party is going there again.lol.
Y’all never learn a thing.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
“Obama is an underdog,for sure.”
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
A sitting president who has the bully pulpit, is amassing a $1 billion campaign war chest, and gets active promotion from his media sycophants (think MSNBC) is the underdog. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Posted by: Don | December 9, 2011, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Why do you care? You hate the GOP.
Posted by: Mary | December 9, 2011, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
But he’s becoming less and less of an underdog if you look at 2010 to now and how much has changed.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
You need to read my 1:15 post again dearie. Dems in KEY states have left the party in droves since 2008. Trying to spin it as an advantage to Obama shows just how out of touch with reality you are. The imposter in chief has compounded the recession problem with his anti business, anti job creator’s, anti American rhetoric.
The only thing that is trustworthy about Obama is that he will suck up to the Middle East. Hasn’t talked much about “Arab Spring” since the Muslim Brotherhood won the election, has he? We won’t until AFTER the next election.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | December 9, 2011, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
WMM,
Dearie? Good grief,get with this century.I read your post.Now you need to read mine— from 2010 to now,its swinging back toward democrats. We all know about the midterms.What sort of shocker do you think your story contains? I get that Fox spun it and you bought it, but, I mean,seriously,how dense. There are still more registered dems than Republicans and Republican enthusiasm is waning.
The GOP botched an opportunity to evolve and offer a good presidential candidate to the people. Or even a generic Republican that the people could rally around.Americans don’t like Newt. Heck,half of the right wing doesn’t like Newt. Both Newt and Mitt are uninspired and uninspiring choices. That’s just the truth.Honest Republicans will tell you that. And neither can be trusted for slightly different reasons. Peggy Noonan wrote a piece about how disturbing Newt is and why. She claims he’s inspiring,too….but to whom? The same type of kooks that loved Sarah Palin and think she’s a genius. The people who know Newt do not want him to get the nomination.That’s telling.
I don’t want anyone in the Republican field to win, so I say,bring it on.Nominate Newt. But don’t expect to be able to pretend it was all a horrible mistake in ’14. You will just be repeating the McCain crazy temperament thing,but worse. Americans get that Obama is much more trustworthy than Newt. They just do.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
WMM, I read your post regurgitating the Fox spin of the study and understood it perfectly. Again,you’re talking about since 2008,not since 2010. My post stands and your hate filled screeching sounds more Anti American than the president’s rhetoric.
Both Newt and Mitt are uninspired and uninspiring choices. That’s just the truth.Honest Republicans will tell you that. And neither can be trusted for slightly different reasons. Peggy Noonan wrote a piece about how disturbing Newt is and why.
Remember the Esquire profile of Newt — the one in which his ex-wife sheds some light on how greedy and self-centered and power-driven he is.And how vacant?
He’s an erratic and arrogant person who has been described as a disgraced managerial disaster.
No wonder the GOP is so unpopular.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Kimberly, when Pres. Obama flip-flops you call it he changed his mind, but then when someone else changes his mind because circumstance has changed you scream FLIP-FLOP, by you it all depends if it is a democrat or republican, liberal or conservative.
Posted by: Lizzie | December 9, 2011, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Lizzie and Mary, the same sort of projection of your own partisan views. Bad habit? Compulsion? Freudian?
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Esquire. *snort*
The left-wing nutjobs are really unhinged these days. The comedy writes itself.
Posted by: Susan | December 9, 2011, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Esquire profile, Peggy Noonan column, his half-sister, his ex-wife, the Republicans who worked with him in the house, Karl Rove, libertarians…. lots working against Newt. But the truly partisan know nothing except…. but, but, but, those libruls…. they’re the ones who portray Newt as erratic, hypocritical, vacant, cheater, disgraced, flip-flopping, inconsistent, untrustworthy.
Problem is…. there’s lots of dirty laundry to air out. Newt’s biography includes three wives, cheating, a $300,000 fine for ethics violations– the first time that EVER happened to a speaker of the House– and a $250,000-plus charge account at Tiffany. Gingrich has flip-flopped and floundered on issues from health-care reform to climate change to Libya to the Middle East — and he recently has said a lot of stupid stuff regarding child-labor laws. He is erratic and has been described as a managerial disaster.
And his ego is legendary.
No wonder the GOP is so unpopular.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Oh snap! An Iowan pastor calls Newt the Kardashian among the candidates. lol. He mentions the flip flops, infidelities and a lack of credibility.
Just sayin…. lol!
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Obama’s not an underdog. Though it’s not necessarily due to his immense strength or something. The GOP is just plain creepy. They cheer about the death penalty. They think everyone who loses their house is a loser. They think the unemployed are lazy and the uninsured deserve to die.
A week ago, they told me the messiah was the CEO of a bankrupt pizza chain…. turned out he was just a lecher. Before that, it was supposed to be the governor of Texas… it turn out the guy can only remember two things at a time. Prior to that, the Messiah was a deranged woman from Minnesota, turns out she was just a deranged woman from Minnesota. Before that, the Messiah was reality TV star who wears a wig made from hair the clogged Drain of Richie Cunningham’s shower. Now, the Messiah is a thrice married, spendthrift crook and lobbyist who is famous his hypocrisy and enormous ego…. There’s still that pro-choice guy, pro-Obamacare guy from Massachusetts, once he figures out what the GOP wants, he might be next Messiah. And then there’s the man on dog guy. And, finally, there’s the least laughable, though still somewhat disturbing, one: Ron Paul. But you all insist that he’s the absurd lunatic. (And Huntsman is no idiot…. but once he declared, I knew that the Republicans fear him for having been appreciated by Obama at one point in his life… and it’s an all-consuming hate they have for Obama.).
People say this and that about independents… but I have voted for just as many Republicans in my life as I have Democrats. I pick the candidate. I picked Obama over McCain, and am glad I did it. He isn’t perfect, but he’s still better. Picked Bush over Gore, and then Kerry over Bush, because I saw where I had made the mistake. I truly wish there were a reasonable alternative to Obama, because I would consider that person. But let’s face it…. it seems totally likely that the GOP is going to nominate someone who is an utter joke. I mean, you just can’t win the Republican primary without being a freak of some sort. I hate to say it. No matter how mad independents are at Obama, they just aren’t going to pull the lever for the Republican.
I mean, let’s face it, Obama is going to have an easier time than he would have if he was running against the pre-GOP Tea Party. And it will still be closer than it should be. And there still is the problem of the voter suppression. That could be decisive. But, like I always say, make sure you register and your neighbors register, register with a reputable group, and make sure you know the voting laws very well. If fanatics are willing to run around telling ridiculous lies about Obama, they are willing to do and say things to keep people from casting a ballot in his favor (and because these fanatics are also religious fanatics, they probably think they have a morally justified reason to stop you from voting…. like maybe they imagine you are against Christmas or something… or that you are a Kenyan). Learn the law, keep your eyes open, be a good neighbor…. and America will be better for it!
Posted by: Blip | December 9, 2011, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
It’s pretty sad when this is supposed to be the best of the Republican party running as candidates for President. A sad statement about the Republican Party.
Posted by: Jamie | December 9, 2011, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Romney can’t belong to the Martini party, he doesn’t even drink alcohol.
Posted by: Daniel | December 9, 2011, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
No wonder communists coined the term “useful idiot” to describe liberals.
Posted by: Susan | December 9, 2011, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. – Gandhi
RON PAUL 2012 !
Posted by: Matt | December 9, 2011, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
No, you know what a “useful idiot”… anyone in the US who isn’t rich, but supports trickle down economics.
The simple fact: Trickle down economics has consistently hurt the middle class.
You might not have realized, because the banks were giving you a second mortgage on your home, the credit card companies were offsetting your losses with high interest loans, and households with one working parent now need two incomes and fewer children to get by.
But let’s face it, America. The bankers have taken away our children’s parents. Taken children away from families. Taken our earning away from us. And, now they are taking our homes. Next up, they want to take away our retirement savings. And all this time, their wealth grows exponentially.
You know why? Because “useful idiots” have been brainwashed into thinking it’s class warfare to notice this grand larceny.
You’ll try to argue with me and swear up and down that it isn’t true. But you just can’t argue with the numbers. Imagine that…. our enormous middle class, quickly being robbed into poverty. And you sit there pleading that the robbers are in the right, that they need more time, that they need better tools, and that the police should protect their hoard of loot as they make their getwaway.
You need to step out of your 1950s, red scare, dreamworld….. the people who are out of jobs aren’t useful idiots! They are your neighbors. They have had their future stolen from them… and we all played a part in it by believing in “Trickle Down Economics” like it was divinely inspired. You should be helping them, instead of calling them communists. We need to change the law and start supporting the people that actually do the work in this country.
Posted by: blip | December 10, 2011, 1:50 am 1:50 am
Another wordy blip on the screen, lol. “Trickle down economics” sure does work better than trickle up unemployment and poverty. It also works better than tossing money away because of dogmatic ideological blindness and to achieve political payoffs to buddies and donors, as in Solyndra.
“You need to step out of your 1950s, red scare, dreamworld”. Few people I have seen who live in that conveniently claimed world, but many are living in the false hope of a laughably phony leftist “utopia”, where the government creates and guarantees everyone the same dull mediocrity. Not for me, and not for most of America.
Posted by: Carol | December 10, 2011, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Obama may suck, but others might suck more.
Food for thought, uh…duh.
Just sayin….yet again, lol!
Posted by: Kimberly | December 10, 2011, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
I am a somewhat overweight and very bored housewife with a cause.
In short, i can’t lose.
Just sayin….yet again, lol!
Posted by: Kimberly | December 10, 2011, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
“I am a somewhat overweight and very bored housewife with a cause.
In short, i can’t lose.
Just sayin….yet again, lol!”
POSTED BY: KIMBERLY
OK, thanks for that. Now we know the truth of your sad and special case.
Posted by: LexingtonLady | December 10, 2011, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
““Trickle down economics” sure does work better than trickle up unemployment and poverty.”
Trickle down economics turned out to be trickle up unemployment and poverty. But, apparently, your ideological blindness renders you incapable of doing the math.
You think our current economic woes are the result of leftist, utopian pipe dreams… yeesh. Gimme summa that PCP you’re smokin’, because it left your brain half broken, or maybe you’ve just misspoken. No, wait, I think you’re surely jokin’. Nobody in their right mind, not even Sam Eagle, believes that anyone but capitalists repealed Glass-Steagall. They promised us gold as they laughed from above, and the GOP said it was just some tough love. To inspire the peons to get up on top, as they unzipped their zippers and let the drips drop. Pennies from Heaven or so the songs says, but it’s just trickle down theory raining gold on our heads. Gold you can’t spend, because it’s locked in their banks. We do the work, and they get the thanks. And if we ask for a raise, they call it class war. But we just want a scoreboard to reflect the real score. Sorry I took off, went off on a tear. But if you fart in my car, you will hear me swear. And I’ll open the windows and let in some air. And when the stink blows away, we can say that we’re square.
But you can’t belch those lies in the public domain, without people thinking you’re smoking cocaine. This last 40 years, we’ve seen wages decline, while productivity itself has consistently climbed. We gave tax cuts to the job creators. We’ve cut regulation and cut regulators. We’ve cut down so low, we’ve got nowhere to go, and now you want us to deepen and deepen the hole? Then to blame Obama for what you promised to do? You talk like you know, but you haven’t a clue.
Posted by: blip | December 10, 2011, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
This post is trying to tie Romey and Gingrich to wealthy people are you kidding me. Obama’s has collected billions from unions, pacs, special interest. His closet allies are the super rich, Buffet, Gates, Immet and the facebook kid the Hollywood elite and these democrats are really going down this road!
Posted by: jazzy | December 10, 2011, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm