Gay Veteran Steals the Show at Romney Endorsement Event

Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney talks to Bob Garon during a campaign stop at the Chez Vachon Restaurant, Dec. 12, 2011 in Manchester, N.H. - Jim Cole / AP Photo
MANCHESTER, N.H. - Mitt Romney had an uncomfortable exchange over same-sex marriage with a gay veteran having breakfast in New Hampshire this morning.
At an event that was meant to highlight the endorsement of Romney by Manchester Mayor Ted Gatsas, veteran Bob Garon of Ebson, N.H., asked the presidential candidate, who stopped by his breakfast table, whether he supports the repeal of the New Hampshire same-sex marriage law.
A Republican-controlled legislature has moved toward repealing the law, enacted in 2009 when Democrats controlled the legislature. A vote could come next month.
Romney told Garon, who was chowing down on his everyday staple of scrambled eggs and shaved ham at the restaurant Chez Vachon, that he supports a repeal of the same-sex marriage law, prompting an emotional exchange.
“I believe a marriage is between a man and a woman,” Romney said, joining Garon in the diner booth after shaking hands with several other patrons.
Garon responded, clarifying that what that meant was that if Romney is elected he would not support any legislation that would change the law so that gay servicemen would get the same benefits as heterosexual couples.
“I believe marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman,” Romney said. “We apparently disagree on that.”
“It’s good to know how you feel, that you do not believe everyone is entitled to their constitutional rights,” the 63-year-old New Hampshire resident responded.
“No, actually I think at the time the Constitution was written it was pretty clear marriage was between a man and a woman,” Romney said, just as one of his campaign aides chimed in that they had “to get going” to another Fox interview.
“Oh, I guess the question was too hot,” Garon quipped to Romney and his aide.
“No, I gave you the answer, you said you had a yes or no answer and I gave you the answer,” Romney said, turning back to face Garon.
“You did and I appreciate your answer. And I learned something, New Hampshire is right, you have to look a man in the eye to get a good answer and you know what governor?” Garon said, pausing. “Good luck. You’re going to need it.”
Romney laughed and agreed with Garon that he’d need the luck, shaking his hand before leaving. Garon then held court with the media, voicing his anger of Romney’s answer while also saying that he had “got what he asked for” when he poised the yes or no question.
Asked by reporters after Romney left why he feels so strongly about the issue, Garon grew even more passionate.
“Because I’m gay, all right?” he said. “And I happen to love a man just like you probably love your wife.”
Garon was sitting in a booth with his husband, whom he said he married in June.
“I went and fought for my country and I think my spouse should be entitled to the same [benefits as they would] if I were married to a woman,” he said. “What the hell is the difference?”

Email
Rick Santorum Defends Earmarks
Ron Paul Ad's Call Santorum a 'Fake'
“I went and fought for my country and I think my spouse should be entitled to the same [benefits as they would] if I were married to a woman,” he said. “What the hell is the difference?”
The difference is, the Christian Taliban in this country thinks your spouse isn’t entitled to equality under the law. They’re fine with you laying your life on the line for the country. But that’s about ALL they would allow you to do, if they had their way…………
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 10:47 am 10:47 am
“No, actually I think at the time the Constitution was written it was pretty clear marriage was between a man and a woman,” Romney said.
What part of the Constitution says a marriage is between a man and a woman, Mitt? It talks about equal protection under the law. But as far as I know, marriage itself is not in the Constitution.
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Fix the guy’s town: It’s Epsom.
Posted by: nhnitpicker | December 12, 2011, 10:50 am 10:50 am
This is the mainstream media for you. The fact that this man is a veteran has nothing to do with anything. Stop attempting to be like FOX News. The story can stand on it’s own without the smear attempt. Our party is better than that!
Posted by: mojo | December 12, 2011, 11:13 am 11:13 am
(CLAP!) (CLAP) (CLAP!) (CLAP!) (CLAP!!!!) [standing ovation!!!]
Well done Mr. Garon!!! Well done indeed!!!! Thank you for your service!
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 12, 2011, 11:19 am 11:19 am
At the time of the Constitution and well into the 20th Century, homosexuality was illegal, punishable by prison. The Constitution does not mention marriage at all. Heck, at the time of the Constitution, slavery was legal, women could not vote or own property. We have learned a great deal since then. Times change, so must “tradition”.
Posted by: pksk531 | December 12, 2011, 11:21 am 11:21 am
“No, actually I think at the time the Constitution was written it was pretty clear marriage was between a man and a woman,” Romney said.
Marriage ain’t in the Constitution, Mitt. But, when it was written, black slaves were counted as 3/5ths of a human being. Things change, Mitt. TIMES change. The Founding Fathers weren’t gods, nor were they perfect…………
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 11:23 am 11:23 am
“Steals the Show”? Only because you (the media) pay attention to it and make it a big deal. The institution of marriage as being between a man and a woman predates the establishment of this country, and many countries. Why should it need to have been mentioned in the Constitution? Well, apparently, it should have been. That so many kowtow to an invented concept like same-sex marriage shows a shallowness of thought and lack of intelligence that is amazing, but nothing new.
Posted by: Bob S | December 12, 2011, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Hey securityhero. No one is telling you how to live your life. Let this man be. He has done nothing to you. Are you free of sin?…drop the stone before you show the rest of us what a person of sin really is.
Posted by: mojo | December 12, 2011, 11:32 am 11:32 am
If I was Romney, I would have punched him in the teeth. So sick of the queers getting any attention at all. Less than 1% of our poplulation suffers from sexual confusion.
Posted by: ron stephenson | December 12, 2011, 11:32 am 11:32 am
The fact that this man is a veteran has nothing to do with anything.
Posted by: mojo | December 12, 2011, 11:13 am.
Actually, it kinda does, since this veteran wants benefits for his same-sex spouse through his government pay and benefit system……
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Indeed when the U.S. Constitution was written, marriage was between man and woman only. In those same days, slavery was still legal too. Our understanding of the ethics of the Constitution have changed that, thanks God. So there is no actual reason to limit ethics to the topic of slavery and reject same-sex marriage as being uncostitutional.
Posted by: meynen guy | December 12, 2011, 11:34 am 11:34 am
It’s never been a question as to which party is for the RIGHTS of ALL our citizens!!! I have NO idea why ANYONE votes Republican!!!
Posted by: demNme5 | December 12, 2011, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Hmmmm, the New Hampshire legislature…. just another example of the Republican’t party going out of its way to actively seek to diminish and remove an individual’s personal rights. Thank you, Mr. Garon for standing up and speaking out against this narrow-minded bigotry, and thank you for your service to our country. I just wish the country that you fought for had a little more respect for you.
Posted by: Robert | December 12, 2011, 11:39 am 11:39 am
I don’t think the government should recognize a RELIGIOUS sacrament. Create a fair tax system for all. Get the government out of the business of promoting the well being of TRADITIONAL (ones that can bare children) families.
Posted by: dom | December 12, 2011, 11:40 am 11:40 am
I see a growing trend; more and more US citizens are asking the candidates gay-related questions. I think we should hit them at every stop they make. Ask them questions about same-sex marriage, same-sex marriage benefits, gay service-men’s rights, general questions about equal rights towards GLBT, and DEMAND DIRECT ANSWERS. If they don’t give a direct answer and they start to walk away, yell “Why won’t you give a direct answer Mitt (or whatever the candidates name is)? I want America to hear your answer”. They think the GLBT community has no voice, we will show them that we do.
I have something to say to Mitt and his fellow candidates, “I’m also a gay veteran… and I vote”!
Posted by: John S. | December 12, 2011, 11:43 am 11:43 am
“I went and fought for my country and I think my spouse should be entitled to the same [benefits as they would] if I were married to a woman,” he said. “What the hell is the difference?”
The difference is, the Christian Taliban in this country thinks your spouse isn’t entitled to equality under the law. They’re fine with you laying your life on the line for the country. But that’s about ALL they would allow you to do, if they had their way…………
Posted by: Searambler
___________________
The difference Searambler is the anatomy of the human body. The anatomy itself says homosexuality is not normal.
Posted by: spike | December 12, 2011, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Well said, Mr. Romney. Marriage is “marriage.” Homosexuals can’t understand plain English. One percent of the population is probably disposed toward larceny. The same percentage probably applies to thieves, arsonists and murderers…same percentage as homosexuals…so perhaps we MUST legitimize all of these perversions…as Garon said: “what’s the difference?”
Posted by: Frank | December 12, 2011, 11:47 am 11:47 am
And when the Constitution was written, the phrase “all men are created equal” applied only to property-owning WHITE MALES.
One of the amazing things about our Constitution, and why it is called a “living document”, is that it is written so as to be both very clear and specific AND to be flexible enough to be re-interpreted as we change.
“All men” gradually came to mean all White men (property-owning or not), then all MEN (of whatever race), then all HUMANS (females as well as males).
Marriage is NOT mentioned in the Constitution, and had it been, you can bet it would have been considered a PRIVATE affair, esp. as it was/is primarily a RELIGIOUS institution. And Congress is forbidden from making laws respecting religion or prohibiting the free practice thereof.
Further, every right NOT specifically mentioned in the document is expressly retained by THE PEOPLE or THE STATES. Those who would alter the Consitution or pass laws on a federal level to RESTRICT marriage to one man and one woman are violating the Constitution as written.
The document is written so as to make it far more difficult if not impossible to TAKE RIGHTS AWAY as opposed to granting/expanding them.
MOJO: “The fact that this man is a veteran has nothing to do with anything”
Yes, it does, since not granting him and his life-partner the same rights to marry as heterosexual couples enjoy, his partner is denied benefits they would otherwise be entitled to.
Posted by: Raven | December 12, 2011, 11:47 am 11:47 am
A Mormon should not be discussing marriage.
Posted by: KJM1968 | December 12, 2011, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Frank, the “difference” is that the other things you mention cause harm to others, whereas homosexuality does not. Denying equal rights to people who are minding their own business is not FREEDOM.
Posted by: jock59801 | December 12, 2011, 11:51 am 11:51 am
“No, actually I think at the time the Constitution was written it was pretty clear marriage was between a man and a woman,” Romney said.
Marriage ain’t in the Constitution, Mitt. But, when it was written, black slaves were counted as 3/5ths of a human being. Things change, Mitt. TIMES change. The Founding Fathers weren’t gods, nor were they perfect…………
Posted by: Searambler
__________________
Searambler the historical genius!
Why don’t you read Mitt’s comment again. He did not say marriage was in the Constitution. He said at the TIME the Constituion was written marriage was between a man and a woman. The framers of the Constituion believed that too.
The gay veteran was referring to the Constituion itself.
Posted by: ivan | December 12, 2011, 11:52 am 11:52 am
More of the same overt bias: “gay veteran steals the show…’ In my mind, Mr. Romney’s response was head and shoulders above the sick individual seeking “benefits” for his perversion.
Posted by: Frank | December 12, 2011, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Republicans are for “freedom” and “liberty” of people they approve of.
Posted by: jock59801 | December 12, 2011, 11:54 am 11:54 am
The difference Searambler is the anatomy of the human body. The anatomy itself says homosexuality is not normal.
Posted by: spike | December 12, 2011, 11:46 am.
So what? Blue eyes aren’t “normal”. Neither is red hair. Do you favor discriminating against blue-eyed redheads? Why do YOU care about their anatomy, or what they do in the privacy of their own home? Homosexuality may not be “normal”, yet for some reason a small percentage of the population is always gay. And has been since the dawn of mankind. Why do you think that is? Why hasn’t evolution bred homosexuality out of existence? Or, if you don’t believe in evolution, why does god allow it to continue to exist? And FYI, many straight couples engage in all the exact same sexual things that gays do. Again, in the privacy of their own home……
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 11:57 am 11:57 am
SECURITYHERO, your illiteracy and your obsession with people “sucking di-ks” is rather amusing, but your hatred is not.
Posted by: jock59801 | December 12, 2011, 11:58 am 11:58 am
HEy mojo======sucking other mens di-ks isnt just a sin, it filthy
Posted by: securityhero | December 12, 2011, 11:50 am.
Says the voice of personal experience, I’m sure……
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 11:58 am 11:58 am
He did not say marriage was in the Constitution. He said at the TIME the Constitution was written marriage was between a man and a woman. The framers of the Constitution believed that too. Posted by: ivan | December 12, 2011, 11:52 am.
How do you know they believed it? Can you cite any specific documents written at the time by any of the Founding Fathers stating for the record that marriage is only allowed between a man and a woman? Why did Mitt make that statement? Because the guy asked him about Constitutional RIGHTS. Equal rights for EVERYONE under the law. Not just for heterosexual white males, which is apparently what the Right believes. You Right Wingers are incredibly hypocritical in pretty much everything, so it’s no surprise you continue your hypocrisy with this subject. You purport to revere the Constitution, yet use it like toilet paper when it doesn’t suit your narrow-minded, intolerant bigotry………
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Gays can’t catch a break can they? First they get bullied as children and shunned by some of their peers. If they survive to reach adulthood, they are treated as lesser people by not being allowed to get married or even at least getting things like veteran’s benefits for their spouses. Is it so hard to at the very least acknowledge civil unions so that they and their spouses can get the benefits for having fought a war for this country? For all of you religious folks who are so adamantly against homosexuality and gay marriage, you sure are also good at dissing your fellow man very well. “Love thy neighbor” or something like that?
Posted by: zomgz | December 12, 2011, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
We do need to be careful of all the people we promise benefits to. whether gay marraige is right or wrong is one issue. But giving benefits to a gay man’s ‘wife’? If the government agreed to do that there would be so much more corruption & red tape & the simple answer is No, we should not pursue this issue now. We are in critical condition economically & to promise benefits to some man because he married a man in the military is a little out there. & I’m a bleeding heart liberal. But my heart doesn’t bleed for this. Romney was very correct in his answers. You should not be discriminated if you are gay but that doesn’t mean whatever gay partner your with should get automatic benefits. I feel the more the gays fight for some rights they will go backwards. You have the right to be gay, you don’t have the right to bring in others for entitlements.
Posted by: gypsyEyes | December 12, 2011, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
The difference Searambler is the anatomy of the human body. The anatomy itself says homosexuality is not normal. Posted by: spike …. What does anatomy have to do with marriage?
Posted by: Ted | December 12, 2011, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Searambler, you’re obviously gay. Lay off the ridiculous rants. Your attempt at logic is twisted and dumb.
The thing about gays is that they like to bring so much attention upon themselves. That’s why the “female” gay acts so effeminant
There is nothing in a gene that makes a gay flamboyant. It’s a choice, just like being gay itself, that makes a gay stand out. They just do it to stand out and show everybody that they’re different.
If you want to be gay, so be it. Go ahead, it’s your choice. But stop trying to force your beliefs on the rest of society.
You make me sick
Posted by: Kielbasa | December 12, 2011, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
“If you want to be gay, so be it. Go ahead, it’s your choice. But stop trying to force your beliefs on the rest of society.”
Uhm… who is trying to force their beliefs? All gay people are asking for are the same rights you enjoy as a citizen of this society. You don’t like gays? Fine! Don’t have a gay person in your house or socialize with them. Don’t even acknowledge them when they are in your presence. Its your choice. However, those are not reasons to deny them the same rights and benefits that you have.
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 12, 2011, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
This points out the difference between the 2 parties; the democrats want to make laws telling everybody what to do, the republicans want to make laws telling others what to do. When Romney was governor of Ma., he was not as against gay marriage as is now, now that he needs the votes of ——– actually I am not sure of the modern term for people who want one set of rules for themselves and a separate set of rules for others.
Posted by: VISSIONQUEST | December 12, 2011, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Romney is entitled to his opinion and I completely agree with him. Homosexuality is an immoral act and 50 years ago, if you were homosexual and someone found out, not only did your family dis-own you, but society ostersized you. It is a sin against GOD!!! It doesn’t matter if marriage is mentioned in the Constitution or not. Our founding fathers were Christians and believed in the Bible; and they believed that marriage should only be between a man and a woman. As do I!!!!!
Posted by: historian | December 12, 2011, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Kielbasa ——— LOL! You homophobic jackasses really take the cake. You love to believe that anyone who stands up for gay rights must be gay. You are perfectly OK with discriminating against people you don’t like. My, what a REAL American you are. (That was sarcasm, you twit). Crawl back under your Stone Age rock. No one is trying to force their beliefs on the rest of society except the homophobic, intolerant, narrow-minded, judgmental BIGOTS like you and your ilk……….
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
POSTED BY: SEARAMBLER | DECEMBER 12, 2011, 10:49 AM 10:49 AM why push the issue constantly on those who believe marriage should be between a man and a women, which still is the majority in this country, why are you not satisfied with a civil union which will give the same rights.
Posted by: Lizzie | December 12, 2011, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
“Your attempt at logic is twisted and dumb”. ———– Really. How so? Please argue intelligently, and back up your assertions. How is my logic “twisted and dumb”? If you’re HALF as smart as you think you are, you should be able to refute my arguments with reason and logic, instead of emotion, illogic, and religion. Frankly, I’m pretty sure you are not equal to the task, you half-wit……….
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY
1. Leviticus 18:22 “Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin. Leviticus 18:21-23 (in Context) Leviticus 18 (Whole Chapter)
2. Leviticus 20:13 “If a man practices homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman, both men have committed a detestable act. They must both be put to death, for they are guilty of a capital offense. Leviticus 20:12-14 (in Context) Leviticus 20 (Whole Chapter)
3. 1 Corinthians 6:9 Don’t you realize that those who do wrong will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Don’t fool yourselves. Those who indulge in sexual sin, or who worship idols, or commit adultery, or are male prostitutes, or practice homosexuality, 1 Corinthians 6:8-10 (in Context) 1 Corinthians 6 (Whole Chapter)
4. Timothy 1:10 The law is for people who are sexually immoral, or who practice homosexuality, or are slave traders, liars, promise breakers, or who do anything else that contradicts the wholesome teaching 1 Timothy 1:9-11 (in Context) 1 Timothy 1 (Whole Chapter)
Posted by: anontdh | December 12, 2011, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
GUTLESS WONDERS- u people that try to twist the constitution, ha ha u set and holler about what was what and the meaning of certains writings and descriptions, the only thing left out of the const. is the fact hat it`s framers and authors failed to realizt that 200 plus yrs later this country would entertain the thought and idea that we would have people standing on street corners grandstanding on the theory that being queer is ok or acceptable. if u queer quit trying your agenda on normal people, stand on yer own platform and admit yer problem and horrible SIN quit trying to justify your queer stance on the authors of the constitution that was intended to govern to poloice our politicians and not limited to the individual citizens of this USA good day
Posted by: gordon davis | December 12, 2011, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
You could also say, looking at human anatomy, that hair dye, nose jobs, and braces aren’t normal. Does that make them wrong? Moreover, the only thing our anatomy says about homosexuality is that it won’t lead to reproduction. Elderly men and women are allowed to marry each other, even though they are well past their childbearing years. Infertile men and women are allowed to marry each other, even though their marriage won’t produce any children. Are you saying that heterosexual couples who practice family planning are abnormal, or that family planning should be outlawed? I guess, as a straight woman, that I just don’t see why it should bother you if a small fraction of our population of consenting adults want to marry other consenting adults of the same gender.
Posted by: Rachel | December 12, 2011, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
…why are you not satisfied with a civil union which will give the same rights. Posted by: Lizzie | December 12, 2011, 12:26 pm.
If civil unions DID that, I personally would have no problem with it at all. If civil unions were legal across the country, and gay people enjoyed all the exact same legal benefits as hetero couples do across the country, I would be all for it. But civil unions are NOT legal across the country, and some places that have them do NOT give the exact same legal rights as straight marriages. And THAT is discrimination, and THAT is what I am against. Frankly I cannot believe that ANYONE who truly believes in the Constitution can support discrimination like this. This is, pure and simple, a civil rights issue…………
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
anontdh | December 12, 2011, 12:30 pm post ————– Your bible also tells you to kill adulterers, and anyone who curses against his or her parents. How many adulterers have YOU killed? Oh yeah, and don’t eat shellfish. Or pork. You’ll burn in hell if you do……..
The whole religious ‘sanctity of marriage’ argument is a joke, considering that HALF of all Christian heterosexual marriages end in DIVORCE………
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
What is not in the Constitution is the definition of marriage. As such it falls in the realm of the right of the states to determine under state laws what constitutes a valid marriage.
Disallowing gay marriage denies nobody of their Constitutional rights. There is no inherent right to marriage no more than there’s a right to a hunting license or a driver’s license. Therefore if you wish to obtain a marriage license you must follow the rules. And the rules are: men marry women.
Posted by: FranklinBasil | December 12, 2011, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
At the time the Constitution was established, women had no rights, African-Americans had no rights, so I guess Mitt want’s to go back to that.
Posted by: Shane | December 12, 2011, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Marriage is between a man and a woman. The fights with these perverts will never end until they destroy the fabric of America. If Gay were normal the Earth would be desolate of life withing a generation or 2. The God haters responding to these comments are truly mentall ill.
Posted by: Ray | December 12, 2011, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Republicans are controlled by the right wing christian groups, and conservative Corporations. Romney is a nothing. A nobody, who has a lot of money, and no conscience…Like most Republicans.
I have gay friends, male and female. They and their partners live as any couple would live, and look at life as anyone would.
Marriage isn’t between male and female. marriage by definition is the joing of opposites, or of two differents, or two of the same.
Go to any cafe, and ask what it is called when they pour a bottle of half empty Ketchup, into another half empty ketchup…the are marrying the bottles.
America is backwards when it comes to race, same sex couples, and equal rights for all.
Please lord, open the eyes of people, and show them love if it is true knows no bounds.
Posted by: AmericanJoe | December 12, 2011, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Can you people not read? Romney is not saying it is in the Constitution. He said “when it was written”. He is right. When it was written the societal norm was marriage between one man and one woman. The country believed is so strongly that you could not become a State if you held to polygamy. Low and behold, when the law comes up for a vote people vote to block same-sex marriage.
Also, don’t blame God for people messing up marriage because it is exactly that, PEOPLE messing up marriage.
Posted by: Robert | December 12, 2011, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
This is a republican primary what party are the two men in.Which seems was left out by your staff our was this another left wing trick.
Posted by: carl burns | December 12, 2011, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
I don’t think we should define gays rights as the same as women rights, slavery, right to vote, freedom of religion ect… A sexual preference isn’t a right. You can’t pervert the right to vote and you can’t change the color of your skin. But sexual preference is different. How is someone’s (adult) sexual preference become attracted to young boys or girls (children)? Why do many of them have feelings or thoughts that they always felt that way from an early age. Do you think something is wrong with them for their sexual perversion even though they always felt that way? What is going to happen if there is enough people like this? Do we give them the right to do this just because of the number of people that are like this. I don’t think gays should be treated unhumanely but gays should accept the fact that they have a problem instead of living in denial and thinking that it is a natural way of life.
Posted by: johnny | December 12, 2011, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
The constitution can be changed with dozen of emendment when necessary to follow society’s evolution and maturity or to curb it. Religion must stay OUT of all issues regarding civil, state and federal laws. The church DON’T CONTRIBUTE financially or with workforce with the development of any country, this is NOT the Vatican! A honest citizen, who pays their dues and serves his/her country, must have the same rights as anyone. Gays and straights must behave in public and their private life is nobody’s business. This is not a matter of point of view, this is a matter of good sense and JUSTICE!
Posted by: Chris | December 12, 2011, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Republicans are for “freedom” and “liberty” of people they approve of.
Posted by: jock59801
____________________________
Aren’t you supposed to be a man of science Jock? That in itself is kind of a hateful statement for a man of science isn’t it? A man of science is supposed to be objective.
As a person who is objective, you should know there is a difference between equal rights under the law for gays and gay marriage.
As a man of science, you should also know that the anatomy of the human body itself says homosexuality is not a normal practice. To legalize gay marriage is to make a statement that homosexuality is normal.
.
Posted by: ivan | December 12, 2011, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
FranklinBasil ————– Marriage is a legal union, conferring specific legal benefits to married people that single people cannot get. Thus it IS a Constitutional issue, because of Article 4 Section 1, the Full Faith and Credit clause. If a legal contract exists in one state, then the other states MUST recognize it AS a legal contract, and honor that contract. Yet some states are enacting laws that say they DON’T have to recognize a gay marriage from another state. The Declaration of Independence says that we are all created equal, endowed by our creator “with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.” I guess some people don’t think that applies to gay people. The equal protection clause of the Constitution, the 14th Amendment, provides that “no state shall…deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”. Yet that is EXACTLY what the anti-gay-marriage crowd is doing. Denying legal benefits (protection of the laws) to a small segment of the population for no valid reason.
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
…but gays should accept the fact that they have a problem instead of living in denial…Posted by: johnny | December 12, 2011, 12:51 pm.
No Johnny, it’s abundantly clear from your incredibly ignorant post that YOU are the one with the problem. I feel sorry for you.
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
At the time the Constitution was written, women were chattel and blacks were slaves. Seems we moved past those injustices quite well. I think we could rightly move past this one too.
Posted by: Catherine | December 12, 2011, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Ivan wrote, “…the anatomy of the human body itself says homosexuality is not a normal practice. To legalize gay marriage is to make a statement that homosexuality is normal”
LOL! You REALLY are hung up on the anatomy thing, for some strange reason. God forbid we make a “statement”. So rather than do that, let’s continue to discriminate against millions of Americans. Brilliant argument, Ivan. Just brilliant…………..
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
The fact that gays and lesbians are allowed to serve openly in the military doesn’t mean that the Federal Government/Constitution recognize homosexuality as legal. Furthermore, the Constitution DOES place the responsibility for legislating marriage under the powers of the states, so the Federal Government doesn’t have anything to do with what goes on with New Hampshire’s gay marriage law. Finally, marriage is NOT a legal institution created by any man-made government. It was created by God as between a man and a woman. Not two men! Not two women! Not a man and two women, or a woman and two men! From my perspective, when gays and lesbians try to claim marriage, they’re violating the rights of legitimate Christian marriages. It’s a violation of freedom of religion when you try to usurp the gift that God gave all of his children! Gays and lesbians are no worse or better than anybody, including Christians! We are ALL equally guilty of sin! I just wish that gays and lesbians would get off of their self-righteous streak and accept that they have made a choice to live their lifestyle. It’s NOT genetic, and it’s certainly NOT supported by God. You don’t have to believe in HIm or his teachings and commands, but it’s your future! I’ll pray for you.
Posted by: Truth | December 12, 2011, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Marriage Man and Woman…You can not reproduce naturally any other way..You can love anything you want but marriage is between man and worman…Liberals are destroying the country.. You wonder why our country is falling apart…there is your answer…Values…liberals have none.
Posted by: topcat | December 12, 2011, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Will This same man pose the same question to Barack Obama? He, too, has clearly voiced his opposition to gay marriage and stated clearly that marriage is between a man and a woman. It seems to me they always try to set up the conservative candidates while the president gets a free ride.
Posted by: C | December 12, 2011, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Being a pedophile is not normal. Being a homosexual is not normal. Enough said…
Posted by: ginny | December 12, 2011, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Lizzie | December 12, 2011, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm … Personally, I believe the government should only recognize civil unions and everyone who wants benefits for their spouse should have a civil union. If you want a marriage, which is really a religious institution, then let the church decide if they want to marry you. It wasn’t too long ago that marriage between the races was considered unnatural and we seem to have worked that out and the world as we know it didn’t fall apart. If you think God is against homosexuals getting married, then let God deal with it. I haven’t been notified any of you are God’s proxy on Earth.
Posted by: Catherine | December 12, 2011, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
The whole religious ‘sanctity of marriage’ argument is a joke, considering that HALF of all Christian heterosexual marriages end in DIVORCE………
Posted by: Searambler_____________
Now it’s YOUR turn to back up your assertions. Where did you get your data to support the conclusion that half of all CHRISTIAN marriages end in divorce?
For someone who’s not gay, you’re sure acting defensive…. as though you ARE gay!
Posted by: ivan | December 12, 2011, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Good response from Romney. Now will some tinkerbell please ask Obama the same question in front of a camera…
Posted by: gary | December 12, 2011, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Bob Garon, you are my new Hero! I believe your spouse should have equal rights to mine. I salute you for continuing to stand up for what you believe in.
Posted by: adarc | December 12, 2011, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Mr Romney has his opinion as does the veteran…. Actually I don’t believe the military should change their stance on this major issue. It is hard enough to have open gays in the military and time will tell if Mr. Obama did the right thing.. Makes the hair on my neck stand up…
Posted by: veteran | December 12, 2011, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Why do you say I am ignorant? I am basing my opinion on gays that I have known in the past. Every one of them (without exception) has come from childhoods with problems such as lack of ‘father figure’ and abuse. There is some link here for sure- no changing that. Feelings and thoughts do not always produce ‘correct’ actions. Some thoughts can get distorted by experiences in your life. So don’t feel sorry for me. Feeling sorry does not help. You need people to get help in finding why they think a certain way and once they find out why then that is a first step to being cured.
Posted by: Johnny | December 12, 2011, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
One sure way to nullify a principle of civil order is to dilute or change it to something impractical.
To want Marriage for the sole purpose of benefiting from government or social benefits is an affront to the very principle of Marriage.
The generic demand for the government and social benefits that are intended to encourage traditional families (Defined through Marriage) will result in the end of such benefits since the benefits become unsustainable.
In reality, the demand for ‘Marriage’ has little or nothing to do with ‘Marriage’; but rather a secular equivalency for benefits.
If the activist would stop hijacking the word ‘Marriage’ that is sacred to the liberties of demographics of Faith then there would not be such an uproar about it. But still, the push for the benefits could mean the loss of some elements that encourage families to stay together. After that, ‘Marriage’ will have no significance in ‘Governance’ or ‘Civil Order’ since such distinctions would become of no worth to the general population.
Posted by: Wylie-Mike | December 12, 2011, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
“No, actually I think at the time the Constitution was written it was pretty clear marriage was between a man and a woman,” Romney said.
At the time the Constitution was written, black people were slaves, and woman were 2nd-class citizens that couldn’t vote, own property, and were considered chattel when they got married. Apparently, Romney believes that our society hasn’t changed at all in the past 200 years. Idiot.
Posted by: David in Houston | December 12, 2011, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
The fact that gays and lesbians are allowed to serve openly in the military doesn’t mean that the Federal Government/Constitution recognize homosexuality as legal. …Finally, marriage is NOT a legal institution created by any man-made government. It was created by God as between a man and a woman. Posted by: Truth | December 12, 2011, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
LOL! Another self-proclaimed Christian advocating bigotry and discrimination in the name of their religion. Do you think that homosexuality is illegal? Because that’s what your first sentence says. And FYI, marriage was around long before Christianity. For dozens of centuries, it was a business arrangement, purely and solely. “You wanna marry my daughter? Give me ten goats”. Early societies recognized the need for some system of property transferal and yes, wealth redistribution, as well as hereditary rights. Marriage helped accomplish this. The individuals involved were not consulted, they were TOLD who they were going to marry, usually by their father. A virgin daughter commanded more goats than a non-virgin, thus the concept of revering virginity as a desirable trait in young women was born. Do a little research before calling yourself “Truth”……
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Hey I want to marry my cat, HOW DARE THE GOVERNMENT say other wise. I should be allowed to do this. How dare the evil people in the government tell me I cant. Morals are Morals homo and just because you want to participate in sodomy doesn’t mean the country needs to embrace you wickedness.
Posted by: gold | December 12, 2011, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
@Ginny: Are you freaking kidding me??? Just because someone is a homosexual does NOT make them a pedophile. In fact, the vast majority of child molesters are straight, married men. I have many homosexual friends and I can honestly say that not ONE of them is attracted to children. You know why? BECAUSE PEDOPHILIA AND HOMOSEXUALITY ARE NOT THE SAME THING!!! Moron.
Posted by: Whatthewhat | December 12, 2011, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Dearest Eric, name specifically what kind of ‘special’ rights we already have. Name ONE. I wan’t to know. If my partner of 31 years dies (probably longer than you’ve been alive–just speculating)…I will not be entitled to his social security benefits, nor he, mine. My partner is also a Vietnam Era US Air Force veteran. I’d doubt that you’d have the courage to say what you’ve just written straight to our faces…good luck with that election next year. It appears that christofascist, Newt Gingrich will be the nominee of your miserable, retrograde party. The president will smash him in a landslide!
Posted by: Ray | December 12, 2011, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
So Romney goes back to exactly what was meant in 1776 regarding marriage but of course almost every other thing in the Constitution has been extrapolated forward to fit current society. SMUG HYPOCRITE.
Posted by: Ed Lorusso | December 12, 2011, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Ignorance truly is bliss and so many of you must be in bliss. There is NO GOD it is a fantasy of your ignorant minds and allows you to be easily controlled. Grow a brain. Even if there was a god so you think it would care about what two men or two women did in private. As to your sick of having the queers push stuff down your throat how about the fact that for several thousand years you have been pushing your religion down everyone’s throats like it or not. It’s time to stop this and let people live their lives in peace. We are queer we are here get used to it…..
Posted by: glen | December 12, 2011, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Why was Mitt Romney and Kerry Healy at the Boston Gay Pride Breakfast about six years ago cheering and waving and wishing everyone a great day ? Better yet, I have a question. Why do married couples get a substantial tax benefit ? I could be a straight single man or woman but get penalized because I’m not married ? That is discrimination ! So if these people won’t allows gays to be married how can a gay person ever be treated equally under the IRS Tax Code ? Talk about unconstitutional !
Posted by: Amanda Playwith | December 12, 2011, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
You know why? BECAUSE PEDOPHILIA AND HOMOSEXUALITY ARE NOT THE SAME THING!!! Moron.
POSTED BY: WHATTHEWHAT | DECEMBER 12, 2011, 1:31 PM===Both are sexual preferences……big mouth jackass
Posted by: ginny | December 12, 2011, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Websters New World Dictionary: queer {kwir} adj. 1. differing from what is usual or ordinary; odd; singular; Strange 2. Slightly ill; qualmish or giddy 3. [Colloq.] doubtful; suspicious 4. [Colloq] Having mental quirks; eccentric 5. [Slang] counterfiet; not genuine 6. [slang] Homosexual—vt. [Slang] 1. to spoil the smooth operation or success of 2. to put {oneself} into an unfavorable position n. [slang] 1. Counterfeit money 2. a strange or eccentric person 3. A Homosexual—SYN. see STRANGE be queer for [something] [slang] to have a strong liking for; be obsessed with—-queerish adj.—queer’ly adv. —queerness n.
WHAT PART OF WRONG DON’T YOU UNDERSTAND?
Posted by: wisdomace | December 12, 2011, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Why do you say I am ignorant? Johnny | December 12, 2011, 1:23 pm
I call you ignorant because you think that homosexuality is something that can and should be cured. THAT is ignorant. I call you ignorant because you tried to link homosexuality with pedophilia in your 12:51 post. THAT is ignorant. I call you ignorant because you said, “…gays should accept the fact that they have a problem instead of living in denial and thinking that it is a natural way of life.” THAT is ignorant. It’s YOU that has the problem with what THEY do in the privacy of their own homes. Being gay IS the “natural way of life” for THEM. Claiming they have a problem exposes your ignorance. So I say it again: you are ignorant.
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
That always recalls the age of Sodom when the gays talk about the homosexuality and challenge the people who do not have sex confusion in public. With the technology advancing, People belive that they are smarter than the God whom their ancestors followed. “Where is the wise person? Where is the teacher of the law? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? 21 For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not know him, God was pleased through the foolishness of what was preached to save those who believe.” America is a great country. How come now there are more and more dirt dump on her?!
Posted by: Hong | December 12, 2011, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Hey I want to marry my cat, HOW DARE THE GOVERNMENT say other wise.
Posted by: gold | December 12, 2011, 1:30 pm.
LOL! Another complete idiot. Marriage is a legal contract. Animals cannot sign contracts. You need to stop having sex with your cat. It’s unhealthy and frankly, creepy. And I’m betting the cat hates it too………..
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Ah, so much for the hymn that goes: “You can tell that we are Christian by our love…”
The hate and judgment spewed by those who claim Jesus at their lord are sad testament to hypocrisy.
Posted by: Billbbb | December 12, 2011, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Being gay IS the “natural way of life” for THEM. Claiming they have a problem exposes your ignorance. So I say it again: you are ignorant.
POSTED BY: SEARAMBLER | DECEMBER 12, 2011, 1:37 PM+++And for pedophiles being a pedophile is a “natural way of life” for them. So I say….you are an frickin idiot.
Posted by: roger | December 12, 2011, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
If any of your holes are being used for something other than it’s intended purpose then it is wrong.
Posted by: Amy | December 12, 2011, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
When will Americans decide that government has no business in marriage, period. It is a religious term passed down throughout the centuries and controlled by the religions. Only in recent times has the government gotten involved in order to provide legal protections for spouses (mostly the women). Everyone and anyone should be able to enter into a legal contract and get a “civil-union” as we now call it. Leave the whole marriage thing to the churches and let them each decide who can marry or not. Simple, clean, end of discussion. Get the government out of the marriage business completely.
Posted by: Dugan | December 12, 2011, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
It always amazes me when people state that “liberals are ruining America.” Liberals were the ones who fought for the end of slavery, for women’s right to vote, civil rights and other “agendas” conservatives vehemently opposed. Conservatives wish we could turn back the hands of time and live in a nation similar to the time of our Founding Fathers. Me? I’m satisfied with the present and look forward to a future without religion and people lookng to mythological books for their morality. I’m proud to be a liberal!
Posted by: Michelle235 | December 12, 2011, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
I am sick and tired of the Republican party of hypocrites trying to bring their religious views into our government. If this guy is in commetted relationship with his partner, he is certainly one step above
Newt Gingrich who was cheating on his wife while she was in the hospital with cancer. If that’s the best the Tea Baggers and the party of Hypocrites can do, they are in trouble.
Posted by: Gary209h | December 12, 2011, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Does anyone realize that RELIGION is one of the biggest reasons for hatred, wars, intolerance and illogical thinking? IF we could practice our religion and LEAVE others alone regarding OUR beliefs, the world would be SO much better. Perhaps God saw fit to let Newt have a sister that is a lesbian and for Dick Cheney to have a daughter that is a lesbian and maybe he’ll just do the same to MORE of you bigots that are so intolerant of gays. Perhaps THEN you’ll learn that they are JUST as human as anyone else. As for Mitt Romney, he ran in a very blue state for Governor and HAD to LIE in order to fool the people he needed to get votes from. Now, he’s trying to backpeddle on EVERY utterance he’s ever made because he HAS taken both sides of all the issues he’s ever talked about. I’d LOVE to see Ron Paul form a third party and totally RUIN ANY chance for a Republican to win in 2012. I’d prefer to see SANITY rather than bigotry and intolerance which is one of the main PLANKS of the Republican Party!
Posted by: demNme5 | December 12, 2011, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
“Both are sexual preferences……big mouth jackass”
Ginny, here’s a thought. Go to a dictionary and look up the word “consent.”
Posted by: JoanOfSnark | December 12, 2011, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
For the life of me I cannot understand the Republican conservative obsession with what I do in my own home!! While I am straight, I have family members and friends who are gay. They are among the kindest, funniest, most fun-loving people I know. The ones who are NOT that way – are the Republican members of my family.
Posted by: pksk531 | December 12, 2011, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
“Beastility, pedophilia and homosexuality are all sexual preferences that all three groups claim to be part of normal society. What a joke the liberals have become.”
SUSAN, I think you have that backwards. (and you spelled bestiality wrong…no surprise here). It’s what a joke conservative, narrow minded, tea-party, rapture-believing idiots like you have become!
Now back to the task at hand, namel, the writing of wacky little screeds like you’ve just written on your smart phone whilst shall we say..’ocupado’? Gross! I hope you washed your hands afterwards.
Posted by: Robert | December 12, 2011, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
I like and support Mitt Romney, but I DO NOT agree on his stance against gay marriage. Regardless of an individual’s religious or other belief, gays and lesbians DO DESERVE the same rights to have a full life partnership with another individual. We pay taxes, we vote and we are responsible citizens in every way. WE DESERVE THE RIGHT TO THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS, and to many of us, this means comittment to another person: MARRIAGE. !!!
Posted by: kp | December 12, 2011, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
wisdomace | December 12, 2011, 1:36 pm post:
Merriam-Webster Dictionary, Definition of MARRIAGE1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage b : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage.
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Being gay IS the “natural way of life” for THEM. Claiming they have a problem exposes your ignorance. So I say it again: you are ignorant.
POSTED BY: SEARAMBLER | DECEMBER 12, 2011, 1:37 PM+++And for pedophiles being a pedophile is a “natural way of life” for them.
Posted by: roger | December 12, 2011, 1:41 pm.
But children cannot legally CONSENT to sexual relations with an adult. Look, if you want to defend pedophiles, that’s your business. Comparing them to homosexuals is no more valid than comparing them to heterosexuals.
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
it’s Epsom….not Ebsom
Posted by: Mary_NH | December 12, 2011, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
You can vote Republican and vote for a candidate who doesn’t believe the government has any business defining marriage, that that is a private matter. Ron Paul is FOR your civil liberties!
Posted by: John Hanson | December 12, 2011, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
all i have to say is very short and sweet…gay people know the attitudes of the military and red neck right..if they are stupid enough to lay down their life for that..then they are just plain stupid..i never did it….i partied and had a great time all thru the 1960′s up and til now 2011…saved my money so i never needed their lousy benefits..the military industrial machine is a joke that people are starting to wake up to…if your gonna be gay..have fun..leave the fighting and dying to the straights…
Posted by: bellestarrr | December 12, 2011, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
If you would like to bring anatomy into this, On Average:
1. The right hemisphere of the brain is slightly smaller in homosexual males than in heterosexual males. It is also larger in homosexual females than in heterosexual females.
2. In homosexual males, the left amygdala has more widespread connections than in heterosexual males, who have more widespread connections in the right amygdala. Homosexual females are similar to heterosexual males in this regard.
3.Homosexual men have smaller bone sizes of the arms, legs, and hands than heterosexual men.
4. There are a few genes that occur more commonly in homosexual men than heterosexual men.
5. The anterior commissure is larger in homosexual men than in heterosexual men.
6.The suprachiasmatic nucleus is larger in homosexual men than in heterosexual men.
These things are for the most part, determined before the person is born, and can be influenced by the prenatal environment. There is also NO EVIDENCE, Johnny, that experiences after birth cause homosexuality. This is just an imaginative correlation, correlation means there may be a relationship but does not mean one causes the other. Its funny how actual facts based on research can prove most of you wrong. Maybe that’s why most people with a college education are liberal.
As far as the constitution, the Thomas Jefferson said in a letter:
“I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.”
Science has shown us that this is not a choice, and is actually quite natural. We MUST put religion aside in this matter because religion has NO PLACE in government. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but it crosses the line when opinion turns into action which suppresses and denies people rights.
Posted by: Mike | December 12, 2011, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Obama siad marriage is between a man and a women . I too am an American vet and I say so this vet is the female of the two and sits by his/her husband, right? So whuich one is the b itch. He is too damn ugly
Posted by: musicman7175 | December 12, 2011, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
EASY MONEY, I just did, thank you. It’s “namely” of course. Now go back to stuffing envelopes at your local tea-party coffee klatch, won’t you? Or, stock up on your survivalist supplies. I hear the current version of Turkey Tetrazzini is to die for.
Posted by: Robert | December 12, 2011, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Everyone has a right to try and interpret the Contstitution, but that doesn’t mean everyone’s interpretation will be correct.
As for me, I interpret the Contstitution morally and ethically according to biblical standards and not human ones. Any immoral human being, and homosexuality is an immorality, can interpret the Constitution however they see it, but I know for a fact that our Founding Fathers did not intend for it to be interpreted without moral ground.
The real concept of freedom and equality is grounded in universal moralism and not majority consensus. I accept gays in the military. Let them do their duty to their country, but to say that homosexuality is a Constitutional right is sheer nonsense. Next thing you know people will be fighting to make prostitution a Constitutional right.
Homosexuality is a spiritual sickness and should be treated with love and compassion. Shun the immoral behavior, but not the person. Help homosexuals overcome their terrible illness and blindness to the truth.
Posted by: Arthur | December 12, 2011, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
I love when the old document is trotted out as though it’s never been amended to address contemporary issues. And how wonderfully hypocritical that the issue lands in Mitt’s lap. The Constitution also pre-dates his entirely fabricated religion. How’s that constitutionality for you?
Posted by: Lori | December 12, 2011, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Yet another situation where a gay person wants to make a point in front of everyone that most republicans don’t like gays. We already know that every republican candidate doesn’t like gays (except Huntsman). Even if Romney didn’t give a rat’s ass about gay marriage, he’s forced to say what he said.
Posted by: Zboog | December 12, 2011, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
POSTED BY: ROBERT | DECEMBER 12, 2011, 2:26 PM====You can go back to dry humping your christmas turkey
Posted by: easy money | December 12, 2011, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Go Romney, we do not indeed want to follow the Greek and Romans also the $10,000 bet should be juxtaposed to Newts’ charging $60,000 per speech – Da?
Posted by: Susan Zimmerman | December 12, 2011, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Good for you Mitt. The silent majority applauds you standing up for our beliefs. Perhaps the issue of ‘marriage’ needs to be taken out of the equation and another legal proceeding can be implemented for same sex partners. I’m not entirely supportive of that idea, but it makes much more sense than ‘marriage’.
Posted by: A. Stewart | December 12, 2011, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
It seems (from the story) that Mr. Romney and Mayor Ted Gatsas were unaware that Mr. Garon is gay and was dining with his partner. Now that the “cat is out of the bag,” so to speak… any comments from their respective offices? Inquiring minds would like to know…
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 12, 2011, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Arthur: I’m all for prostitution becoming a constitutional right… but, first let’s work on legalizing gay marriage.
Posted by: michelle235 | December 12, 2011, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Ron Paul is FOR your civil liberties!
Posted by: John Hanson | December 12, 2011, 2:13 pm.
I thought he was against gay marriage. He supported repealing DADT, yet he also supports keeping DOMA. He seems………….conflicted on the issue.
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
I too am an American vet and I say so this vet is the female of the two and sits by his/her husband, right? So which one is the b itch. He is too damn ugly
Posted by: musicman7175 | December 12, 2011, 2:24 pm.
What a great argument. Seriously, who can argue against THIS type of thinking? Musicman 7175 clearly spent a lot of time crafting this amazing statement, pondering it, getting the nuance just right. He must be so proud…
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
EASY MONEY–something you’ve already tried? You’re projecting, dear. It’s so much fun messing with wingnuts like yourself. And, as usual, it always has to come down to some crude sex act (IN ALL CAPS, of course) to make themselves feel superior to the gays. This guy’s almost certainly a textbook closet case.
Posted by: Robert | December 12, 2011, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Garon is not entitled to get the laws changed because he served in the military. Sorry, but that’s the way it is. Posted by: DV | December 12, 2011, 2:31 pm.
Ummm, same-sex marriage is LEGAL in New Hampshire. However, the REPUBLICAN controlled legislature wants to CHANGE THE LAW. Should they be allowed to do so? Or is ‘that the way it is’? If your argument is that the law is the law, then you must be against the Republicans who want to change it. Right?
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Hey Mr. Romney, know what else was pretty clear when the Constitution was written? Mormons didn’t exist. It wasn’t made up until the 1820s. So I guess the LDS shouldn’t have any special rights either.
Posted by: Fred K | December 12, 2011, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Good for Mitt Romney. Shame on ABC news to say it was an uncomfortable moment. From what I read Mitt stuck to his beliefs.
The authors of the Constitution didnt realize that this world was going to become so depraved and fallen as to include what the Bible calls sexual sin.
Posted by: Mary | December 12, 2011, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Marriage is not found in the constitution, so Mr. Garon is way off base. What we do have is a representative republic and the constitution does make room for in the one person one vote (unless you live in CA or IL where voter fraud is everywhere with illegals being allowed to vote because there is no verification of citizenship). So if the people want gay marriage it will be there choice. Within that process is the obvious right of people to disagree; that to is also our right.
What we don’t have in our constitution is the freedom from our consequences. I believe there will be grave consequences from allowing gay, lesbian and transgender marriage, therefore, I am unwilling to support that position as is Mitt Romney.
Posted by: Miguel Montes | December 12, 2011, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
It’s quite simple…….EVERYONE should have equal rights.
Posted by: Gary D. | December 12, 2011, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
way to go Mr Romney! thanks for taking a stand,you just got me vote and support for not waffling and telling the truth. Give them benefits,call it a civil patrnership. but they are not married.The question I have is that as civil partners are we endorsing sodomy???
Posted by: liberal mike | December 12, 2011, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
The Bible too, predates Romney’s religion as well the Constitution. At the same time the Constitution gives deference and acknowledgement to God, both as is indicated in the Ratification Article and the Declaration of Independence.
Garon’s insistence on his “rights” is faulty. We are yet a Republic, governed by democratic principles. But, as the people become more and more corrupted, so too shall the government and the very nation itself.
I am not saying that Garon shall not see his demands met. I am saying that I agree we are facing perilous times and corruption is being manifested throughout our society in numerous forms, homosexuality and it’s claims being only incidental.
We are facing destruction as a society on many different fronts.
Posted by: John G | December 12, 2011, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
wait so Romney believes African Americans are property? Thats what people believed when the Constitution was written.
Posted by: bill | December 12, 2011, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
This is why Mittens will never be president ..Makiing ANTI AMERICAN statements like this ! Perry tried the same Bull and look what happened ..Bachmann tried the same thing ..and brought the spotlight to her HUSBEAR ! Look what happened to all their campains …92% of America is against these religious cult members !
Posted by: JT | December 12, 2011, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Well, that’s Flip Flop FLOMNEY for ya…
Posted by: FLIP FLOP FLOMNEY | December 12, 2011, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
To want Marriage for the sole purpose of benefiting from government or social benefits is an affront to the very principle of Marriage. Posted by: Wylie-Mike | December 12, 2011, 1:27 pm.
Who wants that?
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
The authors of the Constitution didn’t realize that this world was going to become so depraved and fallen as to include what the Bible calls sexual sin. Posted by: Mary | December 12, 2011, 2:50 pm.
The authors of the Constitution also took GREAT PAINS to ensure that religious dogma is NOT included in the secular laws that govern the land. That’s why ‘god’, ‘Jesus’, ‘Christ’ and ‘Lord’ are not IN the Constitution……
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
WOW! what a bunch of uneducated people. “Marriage” was not created by god. It has always been a business institution used to protect families, property, kingdoms and alliances. I government should be completely out of the business of marriage. It should be SPOUSE 1 AND SPOUSE 2…PERIOD on all legal documents. Let “marriages” be done by the chosen personal institution, but the “marriage” should bear no legal weight. Only the government can sanction a union of 2 adults. that way religion can control their fantasy and the government can control the reality of multiple citizens with multiple beliefs…equally….without prejudice.
Posted by: TJ in Las Vegas | December 12, 2011, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
It is a fault to equate homosexuality with “slave holding” and the demeaning of slaves by persons of superior force or power. Richard Allen had been a black slave and recognized that not all persons were agreeable to the enslavement of their fellowmen. “Many of the white people [who] have been instruments in the hands of God for our good, even such as have held us in captivity, are now pleading our cause with earnestness and zeal.”
-Richard Allen
John Witherspoon too, a Christian man by accounts I am familiar with, had this to say, “It is certainly unlawful to make inroads upon others… and take away their liberty by no better right than superior force.”
—John Witherspoon, Signer of the Declaration of Independence. The Works of John Witherspoon (Edinburgh: J. Ogle, 1815), p. 81, “Lectures on Moral Philosophy.”
He was instrumental in the defeat of the slave trade in Engalnd.
Race and behavior are not companion in the determining of “rights”. Martin Luther King, certainly no stranger to controversy said it was not by the color of the skin, but by character men were to be judged. Being black is not a fault. How we behave has many faults.
Posted by: John G | December 12, 2011, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Wait to go Romney! A majority of the country believes like you do. The veteran said it was getting too hot. That’s so dumb. He answered your question. You just didn’t like his answer.
Posted by: mesniffles | December 12, 2011, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
I never hear people pose this same question to Barack Obama? He, too, has clearly voiced his opposition to gay marriage and stated clearly that marriage is between a man and a woman. It seems to me they always try to set up the conservative candidates while the president gets a free ride.
Posted by: Natalie | December 12, 2011, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Thank you SEARAMBLER for ably answering to the intolerant bigots posting here. Marriage Equality is a fundamental human right and IS guaranteed by our Constitution under the many clauses you’ve named. It is the height of religious hypocrisy to claim Bible-based “reasoning” against fellow human beings, quite possibly your own family, friends, co-workers and acquaintances. The Prop. 8 issue in California was expected to pass by all the polls, until the unconscionable, hate-filed campaign by that CULT of Mormonism poured tens of millions of out-of-state dollars into swaying the gullible with horrid, unfair propaganda and misleading erroneous arguments. Watch the film “8: The Mormon Proposition” if you have ANY doubts about the morality of their religion or their leaders!
Posted by: Jack | December 12, 2011, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
It seems to me they always try to set up the conservative candidates while the president gets a free ride. Posted by: Natalie | December 12, 2011, 4:25 pm.
Set up?!?!? The guy was sitting in a booth eating breakfast! Romney stopped by and started talking to him. He asked a question that was clearly near and dear to his own heart, considering his personal experiences. How did “they” set that up?!?!?
Posted by: Searambler | December 12, 2011, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
I’m betting Obama would answer with ah, ahhhh, aooooo,,,ahhhh.
Posted by: ginny | December 12, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
I am politically conservative.
I believe any consenting adult should be able to be married any other consenting adult or adults. This should also be extended to those who desire multiple spouses.
Posted by: Mike | December 12, 2011, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
“I never hear people pose this same question to Barack Obama? He, too, has clearly voiced his opposition to gay marriage and stated clearly that marriage is between a man and a woman.”=====You will never hear Obama asked that question in such a setting. He gets a pass from the lame stream media and their hypocritical liberal followers.
Posted by: sophie | December 12, 2011, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Good response from Romney. Now will some tinkerbell please ask Obama the same question in front of a camera
Posted by: Scott | December 12, 2011, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Gay marriage can never be because it never has been nor will it ever be a marriage.
Posted by: James | December 12, 2011, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Oh, please, the homosexual have to stop trying to look like victims, not everybody have to swallow the homosexual agenda. They exist since the begging of this world, but their purpose now is just to make a show every where. They just have to do what they do all this years: lie down with whom you please, if you lose your soul is your fault for not listening. Christians love all of you, but they don’t have to accept your wrong ways. And, if you want respect, respect the point of view of the mayority. Stop trying to make everybody like your wrong desires.
Posted by: Nilda | December 12, 2011, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
No wonder Newt leads by 35%. Obama you better start to care.
Posted by: Mike | December 12, 2011, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Romney is rude, arrogant and pretentious. Middle Income conservatives need to pay attention. He caters to their conservative views and will push anti gay legislation but he will also take money from them and give it to his good ole boy club. He is a rich, spoiled politician. Anyone who can bet 10K off the cuff has way too much money, do you think he cares about you?
Posted by: katherine | December 12, 2011, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
I have noticed the choice argument being made and I’d like to respond to that. Also I see people citing 1% as to the ratio of how many people are gay. 10% is more like it. I am gay and I assure you I had no “choice”. The choice argument sickens my stomach. If you say i chose to be gay, then at some point everyone must choose their sexuality. So, when did you choose to not be gay and be straight? If you are saying homosexuality is a choice, then by logic, it must be a choice for everyone. So I can then ascertain that everyone is attracted to both sexes and at some point we must make a conscious choice for which side of the road we choose to walk on. You have no idea what it is like to grow up being gay, to know you are different and to also know, instinctively, you cannot tell anyone else about your true feelings. God made me, just as he made you, so quit telling me about “choices” I have made, you have no idea what you are talking about. Why do you say God made the world and everything in it but oh he didn’t make you. God made me as he did you. I do not want “special rights” I want the same rights every American has.
Posted by: Michael Holcombe | December 12, 2011, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
“The difference Searambler is the anatomy of the human body. The anatomy itself says homosexuality is not normal.
Posted by: spike | December 12, 2011, 11:46 am 11:46 am”
Funny Spike…Then why is the male g-spot in the male rectum? I mean – if you want to bring anatomy into this debacle…… Nature has a funny way of proving you wrong, and you should probably go and take an actual anatomy class….And if you want to bring God into it – creating the male anatomy – he/she/it certainly has a grand sense of humor to screw with the minds of you straight men…
And 1%? One percent of this country is filled by the homosexual population? Where did you get your information from? Your hometown of 100? I’m tired of you backwoods, inadequately educated nitwits perpetuating lies about our community and comparing us with the likes of pedophiles, murderers and rapists when it’s two CONSENTING ADULTS minding their own business in their own bedroom. Those who preach the loudest must be guilty themselves. I have been told by some “brilliant, contributing members of our society” that if I am unhappy with where I live then I must move. If you don’t like homosexuality, why don’t you move to the middle east where homosexuals are jailed, or Africa where we are raped and killed? Or are you intolerable of darker skinned individuals as well?
It is not for you to decide. I am not a Godly person, but to cater to those of you who are and CONSISTENTLY want to push your religion into my bedroom – it is for me to deal with, and for him/she/it to decide when the time comes if it does. For now, I will take those chances of going to Hell on the one person who has stayed true, and by my side for six – loving and wonderful – years of my life and hopefully more. I have two degrees, working on a third, I take care of my responsibilities as an adult, and I’d like to think I’m a pretty good person both in morality and character. I do no judge or harm unless personally attacked, and I hate no one. In fact, I forgive you all for your ignorance – as thankfully I will never meet you personally, but wish you would learn tolerance and acceptance of something that is none of your concern, or at the very least take advantage of the vast wealth of information you have sitting in front of you, and educate yourselves.
There is nothing wrong with me. I do not need fixed. My sexual organs work just fine. With a growing population of 7 billion – I don’t think we’re in fear of being extinct as a race/gender/species, and to further add – before you call me an abomination because I “can’t” have children…I don’t want any. Never have even when I lied to myself about being straight thanks to societal pressures. What about those straight couples who cannot bare children? Are they abominations? We are in history, and homosexuality can be seen in over 1500 species. Tell me again, we’re not “normal” by nature’s laws.
You want to talk about preserving the sanctity of marriage when 3 of the leading republican candidates have been found or have been accused of cheating on their wives – Gingrich being the worst example, followed by Cane, and Mitt Romney himself. You have celebrities like Kim Kardashian who was married for 70-some-days. Turn on day time television and you see Maury Povich, Jerry Springer – etc making a living off of “who’s my baby’s daddy?” and “I cheated on my wife/significant other…” And the ever “brilliant” Michelle Bachman saying we as homosexuals have the same rights to marry the opposite sex. That defeats the purpose of being homosexual, and only further perpetuates the degradation of marriage as well as the individual. Please…You’re all hypocrites and jokes….And you’re the one’s I feel sorry for because you can’t live stress free happy lives over the likes of an individual who has absolutely no connection to you. That is a sad life …to harbor so much senseless hatred.
A continual cycle of hatred gets no one – no society – anywhere except backwards.
Posted by: Kelly | December 12, 2011, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Rommey is right!!!!
Posted by: Barry | December 12, 2011, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
I strongly believe Romney is not rude, arrogant and pretentious as you think, but honest with the man. Being gay is not a right but serious moral issue.
Posted by: JAMES | December 12, 2011, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Wait, I like sticking things in a place that Is used for relieving waste from my body but YOU”RE going to tell me there’s something wrong with me? I’m attracted to a man that thinks he’s a woman but YOU’RE going to tell me there’s something wrong with me? Not that there’s anything wrong with that. Ther only thing wrong with it is not the fact that you’re considered a couple. It’s the fact that you’re trying to dimimish the meaning between marriage of a man and a woman. Did you know that domestic violence is 25 percent higher between gay men and women? There’s much more anger involved. You have a hard enough time dealing with what you are so you have to bring it out in the open an try to justify what you do and work make it acceptable. Well, it doesn’t. You’re still twisted. You never celebrated diversity…..You never reached out to someone of the opporsite sex. You’re probably basing your first few dates on how uncomfortable and nervous you were. Well, guess what…..We all went through that awkward stage. You haven’t….But now you’re the awkward one. You’re the one with the inability to have a relationship with someone of the opposite sex. We ALL have best friends of the same sex…..So should we just give up on ourselves and marry them because you did?
Posted by: John Long | December 12, 2011, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Aaaaawkward!
I’m so glad there’s people like this vet, saying what’s on their mind and holding the Religious Reich accountable.
Posted by: Carpool_Kathleen | December 12, 2011, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Asked and answered. Now as to the comments about him serving his country, which I applaud, if we went back to the days when openly practicing homosexuals weren’t allowed to serve, we wouldn’t have this problem, would we? Romney is right about this one.
Posted by: Babette | December 12, 2011, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Ebson, NH doesn’t exist. Do you mean Epsom?
Posted by: CAL | December 12, 2011, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
So if I can’t get married like a hetrosexual, I can’t serve ipenly in the military (according to republicans) as a hetrosexual and my partner and I can’t enjoy the same benefits as a hetrosexual, then maybe all of us homosexuals should stop paying taxes. I am tired of supporting those who do not support me.
Posted by: MarkW | December 12, 2011, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Why haven’t they created a Gay Army, Navy, Air Force, others……It would allow the individuality that they want and it would alleviate the sexual tension that is created. You have no respect for the heteros that serve…..They have to tip tow around you. Well, wouldn’t that be the perfect world. You can serve and not be shunned.
Posted by: John Long | December 12, 2011, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
It is true that God made you but he did not make you to become gay. It is a choice when you rebel against God’s will and design for who you are. God made man and woman at the creation and not man and man as you think. God’s creation was perfect and but like Adam and Eve, we continue to destroy God’s perfect creative work. Please stop using God/s name for something he hates.
Posted by: James | December 12, 2011, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
I’d bet $10,000 this guy was a setup and a democrat operative planted there to ask his “embarassing” question. Of course a Mormon doesn’ t believe in such things as homosexuality and the “sex” they have.
Would love to see a follow up investigation and find out if that man has ever had breakfast there before .
I doubt it .
Posted by: Frank James | December 12, 2011, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
If you can’t have a child…..All you’re doing is playing house. You’re not going to be able to raise that adopted child in anything that resembles a balanced upbringing. All you’re concerned about is yourself and not the child. But, hey…..I’ve got it. Let’s ban abortion and give the unwanted child to the married gays to raise. Then everyone will be happy.
Posted by: Heterophobia lives.... | December 12, 2011, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
sophie: Re: Obama never being asked such a question in public. Have you forgotten Joe the Plumber and all the hoop la over what he said? He was the Republican’s hero for a short time until they realized he wasn’t a plumber, wasn’t in business for himself, and was just another embarrassment to them so they dropped his butt real fast. Want to embarrass President Obama??? Tell him he’s just like a Republican!!! That would do it for me at least.
Posted by: demNme5 | December 12, 2011, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
The only reason married people are given some benefits and tax breaks is because the best environment to raise children is in a househld where they have one mother and one father and the government is trying to foster such environments and trying to give as many children as possible the best chance for a sucessful life. Romney and other politicians should be able to back up their beliefs with logical explanations like this.
Also, notice the jerk (veteran or not) should know enough to take his hat off in a resturant! He’s obviously a democratic plant!
Posted by: traveler | December 12, 2011, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
In this country this guy can fly to Vega, marry a hooker and in 15 mins the girl gets all of his veteran benefits regardless if he has been with his spouse for years… regardless if they are both American citizens who pay their taxes and are just trying to have a life. Republicans will be on the wrong side of history as usual when this is all settled. Republicans say they want government out of your life…execpt for in the bedroom and if they don’t approve of who you love.
Posted by: Steve | December 12, 2011, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
All the economic benefits that married folks get can be conveyed by civil unions. So why is the gay community so bent on marriage? I’ll tell you. They’re dealing with their own consciences and their relationship with God. They think if society approves the marriage, God would never dare judge their lifestyle. It was the same thing with “Don’t ask, don’t tell.” Gays who joined the military when the policy was in effect were well aware of the policy. And they could serve without trouble as long as they didn’t flaunt their sex lives. In fact, heterosexual servicemen don’t OPENLY parade their sex lives. But gays want to OPENLY parade their sexuality, because again, it is a matter of getting society’s approval. Not only that, but this is how gays recruit to the lifestyle.
That’s right folks, I said they recruit. I should know because they tried to recruit me! No one is born gay. Have you ever seen a baby or infant with ANY sexual interests, let alone someone of the same gender? Not unless pushed or brainwashed by an adult. Autopsies of gay adult brains don’t prove anything either. No, gays CHOOSE the lifestyle as adolescents and young adults. They know all the major religions teach it is an abomination to God, but like most sinners, they seek approval rather than repentance and forgiveness.
Why is a gay marriage license so bad? It hurts children! It will enable more gays to adopt. What’s the most important duty of a parent? To introduce children to God so they don’t go through life worrying about what happens when they die. By virtue of the fact that the Bible, Torah, Koran, and all major religions teach the lifestyle is an abomination, gays will raise their children as atheists. And recruit them into a lifestyle that is generally unhappy, and unfulfilled. Do we want to do this to the children?
You think repealing “Don’t ask don’t tell” isn’t so bad? Obama only asked military officers and marrieds about the impact. They won’t have to share barracks rooms and tents with gays. I served my country for four years. Singles had to live with 2 or three roommates. What would a single troop (who can’t get a town pass) do if he came back to his or her barracks room, looking for some sack time, and found his roommates practicing oral sex or sodomy on each other? How many people want to see that? What recourse does he have? There are no spare rooms. He can’t complain to his commander, because a right to be “openly” gay is now enshrined in military law. The whole thing is even more disturbing in battle. Would you want to depend on a couple guys who just minutes ago were making out, to protect your flank? Are they going to be security risks if their partner is captured by the enemy and that enemy wants information? When an attack comes, are they going to fight, or concentrate on shielding their significant other?
Posted by: Jimbo | December 12, 2011, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Spitt Mormon will never be president. You can’t buy it, this moron is wasting his money. Mormons are juust weird.
Posted by: emid | December 12, 2011, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
We need a president like Romney who is not afraid to show his stand clearly to the public. Doesn’t like many politicians today who like to word game in order to lure some votes, Romney does not hide his views on sharp issues, this is a must for anyone who would be qualitied for being the leader of our country.
Posted by: SFQ | December 12, 2011, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Excellent. What a good, honest man to stand up for what he believes, especially in the face of prejudices. Congratulations, Bob. I’m impressed and you made my day.
Posted by: Amber | December 12, 2011, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Here’s a thought to all the pretentious holier than thou mental infants – its none of your damn business who anyone marries or why. If God doesn’t like it, he’ll take care of it. Go back to your couch and shut the hell up!
Posted by: William | December 12, 2011, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Unless Obama is asked this same question on the fly then this is just another example of liberal hypocrisy.
Posted by: whining liberal | December 12, 2011, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
its none of your damn business who anyone marries or why. If God doesn’t like it, he’ll take care of it. Go back to your couch and shut the hell up!
POSTED BY: WILLIAM | DECEMBER 12, 2011, 6:26 PM ===If it involves my tax dollars it is my business so sit and spin. But I’m betting you would enjoy that.
Posted by: justuspofolks | December 12, 2011, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
@searambler,
Wrong, wrong, wrong! Subpeona Duces Tecum (produce the document), God, Jesus, and Lord are in the Constitution. The Ratification Article IV makes no sense without a corresponding understanding of the intention of the signers approving the ratification. Every one of them knew precisely what “in the year of our Lord” meant and the only credible evidence of what was intentioned by their hand and seal is the Bible establishing the term “one thosand seven hundred and eighty seven. Too, the phrase, “Of the independence of the United States the twelfth”, refers back to the Declaration of Independence alone and nothing else. A cursory examanation of that document reveals a significant respect for the Creator.
You cannot just rewrite history.
Posted by: jJohn G | December 12, 2011, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Some of the comments posted on here are really disgusting!! I am amazed to hear of such hateful bigots! How does two men or two women getting married affect you?! It doesn’t so stop trying to force everyone to believe what you believe, if you don’t like it you don’t have to agree with it but stop forcing people to follow your beliefs by making it against the law for them to marry!
And those of you posting some of the horrible comments on here, you are the new KKK…BIGOTS…that’s all you are. And it’s disgusting to think many of you probably have kids and are teaching them the same hate your posting on here!
Posted by: nonldsutahn | December 12, 2011, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
It is interesting that the veteran never mentioned he was gay during the conversation with Romney. It was clear the guy wanted as unbiased response a possible and to have that look in the eye that views the soul. How many of us can claim to have looked a politician in the eye and judged his/her soul? Did you notice the veteran did not say what he found in Mitt’s eyes? His “good luck, you’re gonna need it” is telling, however. I think we can guess with little effort.
Posted by: Wayne | December 12, 2011, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
I want someone to ask Obama the very same thing and see what response he gives. His position is the same as that of Mitt Romney! It’s not as if there are any presidential candidates, Republican or Democrat, save perhaps Gary Johnson, that are FOR GAY MARRIAGE! ABC News is trying to make a big deal out of nothing, in an atttempt to paint Romney as some sort of bigot or something!
Posted by: Denver1 | December 12, 2011, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
way to go Mr Romney! thanks for taking a stand,you just got me vote and support for not waffling and telling the truth. Give them benefits,call it a civil patrnership. but they are not married.The question I have is that as civil partners are we endorsing sodomy???
Posted by: liberal mike | December 12, 2011, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Oh give me a break!! What guy out there isn’t endorsing sodomy…at least in his own bedroom!
Posted by: nonldsutahn | December 12, 2011, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
I have read hundreds of these comments , now I want to comment on my own. I think we need to see how fired up we can get the married couples to give up their rights of being married, the wife needs her own benefits and the husband his own benefits. How many of you would be in an uproar as soon as the gov’t removes your rights and benefits.NO more joint filing,insurance policys, death benefits.etc> LORD help us all if that was to happen. Listen up govt , you could save alot of money here.
Posted by: patrick | December 12, 2011, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
My concern is that people “confront” a candidate. Why should anyone be “confronted” and made to feel uncomfortable? Confrontational is not what Americans need to be to conduct ciivil government. They need to be civilized and treat others as they would like to be treated.
Posted by: Craig | December 12, 2011, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
I spoke to soon. I retract my previous post regarding confrontation.
Posted by: Craig | December 12, 2011, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
I find it funny when people try to make a point that marriage is between a man and woman…and that has always been the case. Read your history…there have been plenty of reference to marriages of two men…some of royal nature. Dates back to B.C….and that predates the constitution…and the bible. So if you don’t believe in gay marriage…then don’t get married to a gay. Meanwhile, we still deserve rights…and as people are so fond of saying, if you don’t like the idea of democracy…then you can always move.
Posted by: Jonathan Greene | December 12, 2011, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
“No, actually I think at the time the Constitution was written it was pretty clear marriage was between a man and a woman,”….. The constitution was also written during a time when slavery was legal.
Posted by: Jeff | December 12, 2011, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Smut Romney.
Posted by: Jeff | December 12, 2011, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
I think it’s interesting that so many people are using the Bible as a way to back up their beliefs. Now, it may just seem odd to me, since I’m Wiccan, but wasn’t the Bible written by people (mostly men)? The fact that a book so old, with so many existing revisions, is used to uphold something like who people are allowed to love and cherish is wrong to me…
Not to make this purely into a matter of religion, but it simply doesn’t make sense. We are Americans, our country is supposed to be one of religious freedom. To try to make America into a Christian nation, and force your Christian beliefs on everyone flies in the face of the freedoms so many have died to protect. I am not in the military, but I fully support the troops who fight for my freedom to choose to be Wiccan! Are we to assume that because their are ultra-religious people in America that traditions like hetero-only marriage should stay the same, because it makes them more comfortable? Or is it that only Christian homosexuals cannot marry? I am a straight woman, but if someone tried to tell me I couldn’t love someone because of a religious book I don’t follow, how is that winning their argument.
“Oh, the Bible says you can’t do that!”
“That’s okay. I don’t believe in the Bible.” :)
Posted by: Stasi | December 12, 2011, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Marriage is for men and woman. Any other plan is a full of crap set up to steer the un- savvy in the dark side toward a cliff, they are full of crap (which really makes it sic). Convincing young males and young females they are not capable of loving the opposite sex and they are free and strong to believe it!!!!!!!!!!!! Shat is right.
Posted by: Parenttrap | December 12, 2011, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Another Liberal attempt to try and make Americans believe that Homosexuality is a viable and acceptable lifestyle choice. I, for one, miss the good old days when they had the decency and sense of shame to stay in the closet.
Posted by: T. Creedon II | December 12, 2011, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
I agree with Mitt. Marriage is between a man and a woman. You can disagree with me, but this is my own personal belief that is based on my own religious values. You can go ahead and disagree with my religious values, but hopefully you are open-minded enough and tolerant to accept that I was born this way.
Posted by: Josie | December 12, 2011, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
“i think that it was pretty clear at the time the constitution was written that marriage was between a man and a woman”…what an inane and archaic point of view…of course it was…but it wasn’t because there were not homosexuals…nor was it because they didn’t want to be married…it was because 200 years ago no one dreamed that it would be o.k. to be gay and not have to hide.
Posted by: rocky | December 12, 2011, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Historian ( DECEMBER 12, 2011, 12:22 PM) Must have been a pretty big “Ostersizer” they had back then. Oh, and by the way – go easy on those exclamation points. You’re getting pretty loud.
Posted by: Bookman | December 12, 2011, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
*Epsom
Good for him! Why shouldn’t gay marriage be legal? No one is attempting to force the churches into practicing these unions-but if the government is going to allow two consenting adults who are straight to marry, why not two consenting adults who are gay?
Don’t want a gay marriage? Don’t get one. Seriously. Grow up and realize that your religious beliefs shouldn’t dictate law. No one is going to force any of you self-righteous homophobes to marry someone of your own gender, so stop acting like it has any effect on you. You are not the center of the universe, and Christianity is not the basis of our laws. Get over it, and remember that whole “love thy neighbor” mandate from the bible-stop the illogical, immoral hatred of people who are different from you! Who are YOU to dictate what other people can or cannot do? (And before the bashing starts, I am straight, happily married, and a mom.)
Posted by: jenny | December 12, 2011, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
Wow! Thought this was the land of the free? Yet not everyone is nor do we all have equal rights! Guy people are born gay made by God! There was a time Blacks were slaves, women could not vote etc.. Times change, things change! It’s not about Marriage, forget that word! It’s about equal rights in American. Other countries are far ahead of us on this issue and you can get married! One day we will look back and say, wow!I can not believe we treated gay people that way, just like we can not believe black were our slaves or women had not rights or black and whites could not get married etc.. It will happen, the younger generation will make it happen!
Posted by: Allen | December 12, 2011, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
I find the gay agenda to be perverse at best. If you want to be gay, fine, but do it in the privacy of your own homes. Why the need to flaunt your lifestyle and shove it in the faces of non-homosexuals? Do you really think you’re going to gain acceptance that way? You’re only hardening the hearts and minds of those you offend against you. Being gay isn’t a right or a privilege.
Posted by: BooHoo | December 12, 2011, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Again why the heck are we even talking about this. Our country is about bankrupt, and we have no jobs. We are worried about gay marriage. So you will vote for someone on one issue? We have bigger problems. Why do people think that dems care about them so much.
Posted by: Rick | December 12, 2011, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
When this country was founded, the founding fathers were very much against religion, thats why they left to come here, and they say our country was founded on religion, I wish people would quit distorting history, that’s why we have freedom of religion.
Posted by: andy | December 12, 2011, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Andy said When this country was founded, the founding fathers were very much against religion, thats why they left to come here,—You really suck at American history. How did you get past the 7th grade? Or have you?
Posted by: wact1 | December 12, 2011, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
America! Read 2nd Chronicle 7:14, turn from your wicked ways, or God will not hear your cry and prayers. Noah a just man was the only one who did not drown in the flood plus his son, duaghter inllaws and hsi wife. Jesus never turned away any man,or woman, every one had the opportunity to be forgiven for sins. But he never , made excuse or mislead anyone thinking it was righ to sin. This election is all about Character: 1. Character of ethical and moral standards 2. Deception and misleading to believe it s okay to live the life style of homesxuality. Mr. Romney display a good caharacter, he was honest with the veteran. I pray a man of God or a believer in Jesus Christ teach that gentleman the truth. You will not and can not get in heaven with this sin in your life. I fought for my country and served 21 years. I married a woman. God set up the marriage insitute with a man and a woman. Stop lying to your self, man and man , woman and woman. 1 Corinth 6:9. Get in a Church that teaches, Jesus Christ. John 14:6 the way, the truth, the life.
God have MERCY ON AMERICA
Reformation! Part II
Jesus
Min. Roy McCray, M.A.
Every knee will bow and account for its ways
Posted by: Min. Roy McCray | December 12, 2011, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
I hate it when these people try and act like they are normal, so they can lure decent folk into their wicked webs. They dress all folksy and make us think they are hard working men, when they are just snakes in the grass waiting for their prey. I am particularly sickened at the lack of respect for this fine and honorable man.
That’s right, I am horrified at Mr. Romney’s lack of respect for this honorable veteran, and dismayed that politicians are allowed to dress like normal people, rolling up their sleeves at staged events and pretending that they ever worked a day in their miserable lives. Give them all clown suits so we can see them coming (and run the other way).
Posted by: David West | December 12, 2011, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
@Andy,
To the contrary Andy, religion was lauded as a very necessary ingredient of the warp and woof of this nation. You err.
Homosexuals do not require resistance by the “religious right”, “zealots”, “KKK”, or the Westboro Baptist Church crowd of whom many folks find reprehensible also. Homosexuals intuitively know their conduct is impeachable and say so liberally among themselves. If you do not believe that, read your own literature which is to be found in almost all public places in every major city in the land. Were you not to believe it, the appeal to “curious” would not be made to young persons in our schools so that they might be led or enticed in a way not good.
You do recruit.
As for the damage done of yourselves to yourselves (the human spirit can only stand so much abuse) and your storied histories of such abuse among yourselves, the results are indeed disparaging. It is a violence of unimaginable consequences, and the foolish and unwitting fall easily into the trap of sexual sin. We are only beginning to reap the consequences of unfettered licentiousness.
Fornication makes no distinction as to sex, and the slavish behavior of many cannot be dismissed casually by making accusation against any other.
Once the conscience is seared, little hope remains to recover oneself.
Depravity really knows no limits.
“When the wicked are multiplied, transgression increases…”
What you are asking for is freedom from religion.
Posted by: John G | December 12, 2011, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Sir,
The difference is that men and women come together in the covenant of marriage and have the biological capability of procreating. This is how God created human beings. You can go and live with your man and frankly it matters NOT what New Hampshire or any state law recognizes. God will NEVER recognize your relationship as a “marriage.” Sir, you answered your own question with the word “HELL,” because that’s exactly where you’re going.
Oh and by the way……you’ll need a lot more than LUCK. Enjoy your greasy eggs!!
Posted by: Dan | December 12, 2011, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
It is futile to even try to reason with those who post their ignorance in comment areas like these. Don’t give them the attention they don’t deserve. Ignore their posts and make your own comment about the article or tell your own story.
As soon as I saw the first hateful messages, I scrolled down here to comment. I won’t be back to view this thread, but I will read the article again, and I will send a letter to thank this man for serving our great country and for standing up for his rights, and those of his partner.
Posted by: Duke | December 13, 2011, 12:39 am 12:39 am
I had a friend … she was Albino and very religious … she was studying to be a clergy … she was well versed in Christian theology and various other religions. She went to a retreat … where some charasmatics got a hold of her pinned her to the ground and tried to exercise her Albinoism from her as though she were possessed. These fanatics produced no “miracle” from their exhortations … they could not “cure” her … (she did not want a cure; she wasn’t ill … she was comfortable in her own skin even those these “Christians” obviously were not). She was a hetro-sexual … not oppossed to gays and she never considered sexuality a “lifestyle choice” … just what she was physiologically. To her God is love ..and loves all … it is humanity that looses the grace to treat each other as equals and fails to love. When I say she was a friend; I should reflect on that a bit … she is an eternal friend … she has just passed on (Cancer).
The point I’m trying to make … is that marriage … is a religious institution, and it is a violation of the 1st Amendment to meddle in its arrangements except to the point that society agrees on the age of majority at 18 … being an adult assumed to be responsible enough to make their own determinations.
Romney is wrong … and the Veteran is right … his Constitutional Rights are being violated … his 1st Amendment Rights … Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Posted by: Robert | December 13, 2011, 12:58 am 12:58 am
God created marriage between a man and a woman. Homosexuality is a direct rebellion against God.
Posted by: Ken | December 13, 2011, 1:15 am 1:15 am
Our founding fathers were Deists, NOT Christians. Crazy brainwashed Christians will believe anything their “leaders” tell them. They can only follow, not lead for themselves.
Posted by: bubbafrombama | December 13, 2011, 3:17 am 3:17 am
I’m really curious to hear some of you self righteous bigots to recall , “the day YOU CHOSE to be hetro”.
I have never given it a thought, but, found naturally attracted to the opposite gender from a very young age.
CAN any one of you actually recall having a moment where you were UNDECIDED? Then made a deliberate choice as to whom you’d be attracted?
Science, as described above many posts back, shows us PHYSICAL differences between the straight and gay bodies studied.
When exactly will you stop hysterically shoving your religion on us and actually listen to reason, science, the fact we have secular laws NOT BIBLICAL laws and learn to mind YOUR business and not allow your imagination or nose into the bedrooms of ANY other Americans. And let me remind you the people you seek to deny or REMOVE rights from ARE AMERICANS.
Ask yourself why you think YOU have that right, and why you feel it necessary when you wife or husband will still be the same regardless of the outcome, UNLESS they run off with a same gender lover…….IS THAT the problem/fear here?
Posted by: bobcat | December 13, 2011, 4:00 am 4:00 am
Like it or not, this country WAS founded on Christian principles. You can attempt to re-write history all you want, but the fact is that our Founding Fathers embraced the bible and it’s beliefs. Our country has ALWAYS been founded on Christian principles, and the Bible specifically states that homosexuality is an ABOMINATION before GOD, and a SIN. The loss of morals and principles has brought down every great civilization in history, and we will follow the same path if we don’t take a stand on this issue and stop the moral decay taking over our society. Homosexuality is a CHOICE, not something you are born with, and up until the 20th Century was recognized as a mental illness. I have yet to find ONE scientific peer-reviewed article or study that proves conclusively that homosexuality is something that a person is born with. There are homosexuals that turn away from homosexuality and return to heterosexuality all the time. The fact of the matter is that homosexuality is a perversion, a conscious choice that people make for whatever reason. It’s ludicrous that people even TRY to compare homosexuality to slavery. People are BORN a race, they can’t change that even if they wanted to. People are BORN a specific sex and cannot change that even if they wanted to (yes, you can now have surgeries to become the opposite sex on the OUTSIDE, but you are still genetically the sex you were born.) Slavery in America was about taking people and forcing them into slavery simply because they were a different race. Blacks were denied their equal rights because of their skin color, just as women were denied their civil rights because of their sex. Homosexuals are an entirely different situation. Homosexuals have been offered the opportunity to have civil unions, but that wasn’t good enough for them. They want to completely change the moral fiber of this country so that their lifestyle is viewed as “normal and acceptable”, even though it goes against the very Christian beliefs our Founding Fathers embraced. They want to adopt children because they can’t procreate naturally, which also gives them fertile ground to indoctrinate and normalize their lifestyle choices to a whole new generation of children.
Homosexuality creates a difficult moral situation for us as a country. On one hand we want them to be able to enjoy the freedom to choose whatever lifestyle they want, yet we must balance that with the need to protect the moral foundation that our country was built upon. I personally don’t believe that homosexuals should be allowed anything more than civil unions, and that they should NOT be allowed to adopt. Homosexuals are trying very hard to normalize their lifestyle choices, yet their lifestyle goes against basic human instinct. The problem is that if we open the door for the “normalization” of this perverse lifestyle choice what do we do when people start wanting to normalize other lifestyle choices such as polygamy, bestiality, etc? What moral guideline do we follow to accept or deny their right to freely pursue their lifestyle choices? How do we balance the need to allow our citizens to pursue their own happiness in whatever lifestyle they choose while maintaining the moral foundation that our Founding Fathers believed in when they created this Country? THESE are the questions we should be asking ourselves (IMHO) rather than slinging insults and insinuations at each other. Fighting amongst ourselves will only serve to increase the moral rift that is tearing this country apart.
Posted by: Marinesniper | December 13, 2011, 4:17 am 4:17 am
Just so we’re clear, there’s a lot of rhetoric about marriage being a God-sanctioned, religious sacrament. No argument from me. If the Pentecostal, or Catholic, or Baptist, etc., churches all say marriage is only between a man and woman, then more power to them. So maybe then only churches should grant ‘marriages.’ However, when it comes to a state-(or federal) sanctioned institution, then perhaps any two consenting adults who love each other and want to spend their lives together (and yes receive benefits and tax breaks that come along with ‘legal’ not ‘holy’ matrimony) then civil unions are the answer. This would mean everyone, gay or straight, would need to have a civil union. It seems a lot of people get caught up on the word ‘marriage.’ It’s not about fighting to force a church to accept gay unions, it’s about receiving the same rights that legally married people get in this country. If you don’t want to call it marriage, then don’t, but stop denying everyone the same rights because your religion tells you to. I’m getting ready to go to Afghanistan in 3 weeks. If I die there, my partner (whom I’ve been with for 6 years, before I joined the army, so not just a fling out to get benefits) will not be entitled to my death gratuity. He will not be allowed to see any of the health and behavioral providers the army gives grieving families. He will not even be the first to be notified. He’ll have to find out from my parents. It’s not about demanding the church to accept my relationship…I don’t care. I just want the country to give my relationship the same reverance that I give my country. If you’re going to argue and slander this statement, please use legible English and coherent thoughts based on facts. Thanks.
Posted by: ArmyCPT | December 13, 2011, 9:32 am 9:32 am
This story really made my day. Here’s Romney doing the cynical campaign stunt ALL candidates of both parties do, heading to a diner or cheap restaurant so they can get a few pictures taken with “regular folks” and maybe get a few soundbites. He doesn’t care what these people have to say (none of them do) because they’re not big donors or lobbyists with a bag of money in hand. But he spots an older white guy wearing a veteran’s hat and thinks he’s hit the jackpot, because old white guys LOVE the GOP, right? Especially veterans. He’s even sitting with another older white guy, so double jackpot! Maybe they’re even Tea Party members so if he can get them to say something nice about him that will be a real coup! And then it turns out the two old guys are married TO EACH OTHER and one of them rips him a new hole while the cameras are rolling. LOLOLOL!
And here’s what’s really disgusting. Romney agrees with the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling that corporations are “people” with all the rights (but none of the responsibilities since you can’t put a corporation in jail) of citizens, but he DOESN’T believe the living, breathing US veteran sitting next to him deserves full rights because he’s gay. Never mind that Romney was never in the military to defend our country and none of his sons have enlisted either because they consider that beneath them, something other people do while they’re out raking in money to supplement the $200million dollars their daddy already has piled up.
And the argument Romney gave Mr Garon is idiotic. There is NOTHING about marriage in the Constitution. In fact they didn’t even have Marriage Licenses back then and no legislation about marriage would be written until over 100 years later. If he’s talking about what people THOUGHT at the time the Constitution was written, what has that got to do with anything? Nothing. They thought if you were sick you should be bled by leeches to draw out the bad blood! They also thought slavery was hunky-dory, that blacks and women shouldn’t be able to vote, and women were little more than property. They also didn’t believe corporations were “people” like Mr Romney does.
Posted by: Caliban | December 13, 2011, 10:19 am 10:19 am
“For everyone who curses his father or his mother shall surely be put to death. He has cursed his father or his mother. His blood shall be upon him.” (Leviticus 20:9)
“If a man lies with a woman during her sickness and uncovers her nakedness, he has discovered her flow, and she has uncovered the flow of her blood. Both of them shall be cut off from her people.” (Leviticus 20:18)
“Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property.” (Leviticus 25:44-45)
“Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard.” (Leviticus 19:27)
“…and the swine, though it divides the hoof, having cloven hooves, yet does not chew the cud, is unclean to you.” (Leviticus 11:7)
“…do not plant your field with two kinds of seed. Do not wear material woven of two kinds of material.” (Leviticus 19:19)
“But all in the seas or in the rivers that do not have fins and scales, all that move in the water or any living thing which is in the water, they are an abomination to you.” (Leviticus 11:10)
“They (shellfish) shall be an abomination to you; you shall not eat their flesh, but you shall regard their carcasses as an abomination.” (Leviticus 11:11)
“Whatever in the water does not have fins or scales; that shall be an abomination to you.” (Leviticus 11:12)
Quoting the bible about homosexuals being an abomination is about as ridiculous as the verses above. Hey, marinesniper, I hope you don’t shave!
Posted by: michelle235 | December 13, 2011, 10:21 am 10:21 am
“God created marriage between a man and a woman. Homosexuality is a direct rebellion against God.”
And so what? Orthodox Jews would say the same thing about cheeseburgers, but I don’t see them asking the government to ban them.
Posted by: Paul | December 13, 2011, 11:42 am 11:42 am
God created marriage between a man and a woman. Homosexuality is a direct rebellion against God. Posted by: Ken | December 13, 2011, 1:15 am.
God did not create marriage. Marriage predates your religion by millenia. It was purely a business transaction for many, many centuries. Until quite recently.
So is your god ignorant, uncaring, or weak? Because if it REALLY doesn’t want homosexuality to be around, why doesn’t it simply abolish it? Wipe it off the face of the earth, like it supposedly did with Gommorah and Sodom? You claim it is all powerful and all knowing. So it either KNOWS about homosexuality and chooses to allow it to continue to be a part of human sexuality. Or it KNOWS about homosexuality but is powerless to do anything about it. Or it DOESN’T know about homosexuality, and that’s why it hasn’t eradicated it. So which is it? Is your god ignorant or impotent, or does your god simply not give a damn one way or the other?
Posted by: Searambler | December 13, 2011, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Sad to see that ignorant sheep let ancient books of fairy tales dictate their thinking rather than think for themselves. No wonder this country is circling the drain. I do hope a comet hits the US, so that these ignorant sheeple can die out and so the intelligent can rule the country and fix our problems.
Posted by: SocraticFox | December 13, 2011, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
If any of your holes are being used for something other than it’s intended purpose then it is wrong.
POSTED BY: AMY | DECEMBER 12, 2011, 1:43 PM 1:43 PM
Hey AMY, I bet you give great blowjobs.
Posted by: c64 | December 13, 2011, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Searambler states “Sad to see that ignorant sheep let ancient books of fairy tales dictate their thinking rather than think for themselves. No wonder this country is circling the drain. I do hope a comet hits the US, so that these ignorant sheeple can die out and so the intelligent can rule the country and fix our problems”. A lot of people think for themselves. You don’t need a God to know that homosexuality is wrong and disgusting and UN-NATURAL. If it was natural you could go on an island and exist on your own- but you can’t so its not natural. Just because people don’t want to accept your lifestyle is not a reason to want everyone dead. I don’t want you to die- I just want you to see clearly that homosexuality is wrong. What happened to you when you were young to think this way?????
Posted by: johnny | December 13, 2011, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
I don’t like icecream and I don’t like people who like ice cream. They are fat, lazy, and always have fudge on their faces. I think we hard-working, honest, non-icecream eating christians should not have to be subjected to those who would ingest such filth. Therefore, icecream should be illegal. think of the children.
Posted by: whatgives920 | December 13, 2011, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Alright, let’s get something straight here. Marriage one way or another isn’t in the Constitution. Marriage is a faculty of religious institutions. The VERY FIRST amendment to the Constitution effectively separates Church and State. Indeed, the government has no place in marriage. So if you want to get married and you’re gay, find yourself a church/religion/whatever that allows for it. Romney’s wrong too, there’s no mention of marriage in the Constitution at all, gay or normal.
Posted by: Josh | December 13, 2011, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Very proud of this man for being so bold and asking this question and show how stupid Romney’s position is. Thank you for serving our country! It is absolutely necessary that you and your spouse receive the same benefits that any veteran gets. Completely disappointing to know that it’s 2011 and there are still people out there with these discriminatory beliefs.
Posted by: Arturo | December 13, 2011, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Johnny, Socraticfox wrote that, not Searambler. I know they’re both long “S” words, but sound it out…you’ll get there. I’m not quite sure I follow your “if it was natural you could go on an island and exist on your own” argument. I’m a retired army special forces doctor (*gasp, and I’m gay)…I’m fairly certain I can exist on on island all by myself, for quite a while…however I know that your feeble mind tried to make the argument that only natural things can procreate (i.e. exist on an island for several generations as a species). I think the vision of you procreating with yourself is sort of amusing (you did say, “go to an island and exist on your own”) again I’m fairly certain you meant procreate with other members of your species. Well, I assure you I can. I have a son. I am still human, so I can reproduce without a problem….but again, *gasp, I’m still gay!! There are hundreds of documented cases of animals partaking in homosexuality, even having life-long homosexual partners. So this makes it natural, unless animals choose to do this, and that means then that they have free will….which goes against the Bible…uh oh!
Posted by: MEDDOC | December 13, 2011, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
It is my sincere hope that stupidity will be bred out of humanity long before homosexuality, which is completely harmless. Stupidity, or ignorance, on the other hand is really hurting our progress as a species right now.
Education? Yes, please. War? Hate? No, thanks.
Posted by: Observer | December 13, 2011, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
The dirty little hypocritical secret is that Obama DOES NOT believe in same sex marriage, either. And I think all you guys know that. This guy was a plant and did NOT by any stretch “steal the show”. Romney (whom I do not support) was cordial and gave the man an answer. The man got bent out of shape about his answer. Typical liberal response–freedom of speech…as long as you agree with us. If the guy really wants to do something about gay marriage, attack the sitting president of the US, not a guy who is probably not even going to win the GOP nomination! Of all the mainstream media sorces (who are all pretty much getting thrills up their legs from Obama) ABC is in my opinion, the most fair. Not this time!
Posted by: jumpinjakeflash | December 13, 2011, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
This comments section has quite a few interesting twists and turns, pro and con: Homosexual marriage. I am a lesibian. About half of my homosexual friends were sexually abused as children. The other half had “normal childhoods”, yet as many homosexuals do, reccognized they were homosexual from an early age. Whenever I’ve asked a room full of straight women, if they were sexually abuse as children, about half raise their hands. When it gets down to the issue of who they were abused by, in every case, they were abused by a man; often by their brothers, fathers, uncles, cousins, friends of their family and rarely by strangers. I’m just wondering why the straight women didn’t all turn out homsexual and why those non-abused homosexual women aren’t straight.
As far as marriage goes, I don’t see convincing evidence it iwould be any different and/or better than homosexual couples might have. Every week we hear of stories of husbands killing their wives. These men usually have a long police history of being an violent. Some of these guys even kill their entire family. Straight couples diviorce about 50% of the time in the USA. Second and third marriges fair far worse statistics. Straight couples sometimes swap with other couples, they can do everything sexually imaginable together, lie, cheat and steal, humiliate their partners and leave then financially bankrupt. But, as long as they claim to be church going Christians, they are going to heaven?
Homosexuals can live exceptional lives by being good employees/employers, pay their taxes, follow the law of the land, be good all around human beings. Yet, according to the Bible waving “Christians”, homosexuals are going to hell. Just wondering why Jesus never mentioned one word about homosexuallty? I mean, if it is the horrible abomination modern Christians claim it to be…? Just saying.
How many religions are there in the world today? Each one proclaims their God to be the one and only true religion and everyone else is going to hell, if they don’t follow their way to heaven. As for me, I honestly can’t imagine going to heaven and spending all of my eternity with a bunch of hypocritical religious fanatics. Now that would surely be hell for me.
Homosexuals should have equal rights to a civil union, that has all the equal benefits of legal marriage. Anything more or less is inequidable and unconstitutional. Our Constitution was intended as a secular document, for a secular government. All the benefits granted to each American citizen, is based on secular law. I am a secular American citizen, and therefore, should be allowed to enter into a secualr legal marriage contract, one in which no religion is involved and provides equal benefits, as any other married couple in this country. Just my opinion.
Let the hateful comments begin!
Posted by: Paula | December 13, 2011, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
If a President could be gay, and his partner benefit, then why not others?
James Buchanan – Has there ever been a gay US president?
Here You go for you true historians!
For many years in Washington, D.C. prior to the presidency, James Buchanan lived with William Rufus King, who was earlier Vice President under Franklin Pierce in 1853. King was referred to by Andrew Jackson as “Miss Nancy” while Aaron Brown called him “Buchanan’s better half.” Buchanan actually wrote long, intimate letters to King.
There were many rumors at the time that Buchanan was a homosexual. He is, after all, the only president to never marry in his life. But whether or not he was a homosexual continues to be a point of heated debate between historians. (Steve Tally discusses King and Buchanan’s relationship in more depth in his book Bland Ambition: From Adams to Quayle–The Cranks, Criminals, Tax Cheats, and Golfers Who Made It to Vice President.)”
“Some historians have speculated that King may have been homosexual, and that he had a long-term intimate relationship with President-to-be James Buchanan (it is not disputed that the two lived together for 16 years in Washington). It is also said that King’s detractors in the Senate referred to him as “Aunt fancy” and “Miss Nancy” (both language referring to homosexual men in the nineteenth century). The theory is controversial and a source of debate among Buchanan and King historians. Historian and author James Loewen is one of the theory’s better-known proponents. Presidential historian Michael Beschloss when asked by C-SPAN founder and host Brian Lamm if the United States had ever had a gay president responded that the term “gay” was a twentieth century construct. Undeterred, Lamm rephrased his question, asking if the nation had had a homosexual president. Beschloss replied that it appears Buchanan and King may have been homosexual.”
Posted by: Mark Cox | December 13, 2011, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Meddoc states “There are hundreds of documented cases of animals partaking in homosexuality, even having life-long homosexual partners. So this makes it natural, unless animals choose to do this, and that means then that they have free will….which goes against the Bible…uh oh!”
Why are you justifying your actions because of the actions of animals. Are you saying that you stalk and kill animals normally smaller than you to kill and eat them raw, sometimes kill other humans so you can be the dominant one in your group, cannot tell the difference between right and wrong, and cannot love? I think you brain is capable of more than that so why are you limiting yourself.
There are all sort of sexual perversions that occur in humans. I believe that they come from childhood experiences. People with theses perversions think that what they feel is “normal’ and if they didn’t they would have to want help to get cured. So I don’t expect you to understand that homosexuality is wrong but there is something that happened in your past that causes you to be gay. And there is two choices either to accept it as ‘normal’ or reject it as a problem. Obviously, the first is easier especially when you can be around people of like minds. But sorry society shouldn’t accept this lifestyle similar to not accepting polygamy, zoophilia, or pedophilia. Were they born that way so they can’t change either.
And by the way I am not religious one bit so strike that ‘uh oh’ from the records.
Posted by: Johnny | December 13, 2011, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
where is everyone? Did we end the discussion?
Posted by: Johnny | December 14, 2011, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Yes, and in some case, ABC censors the posts.
Posted by: John G | December 14, 2011, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
With liberty and justice for some!
Posted by: Alejandro Morales | December 15, 2011, 11:22 am 11:22 am
:yawn: Same ignorance, different day.
Posted by: Eric | December 15, 2011, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Marriage is for stability of procreation.
Posted by: Jordan | December 15, 2011, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
lets keep the discussion/arguments going. got to get to the bottom of this.
Posted by: johnny | December 15, 2011, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Its an easy fix. We do not need to change definitions to words for people to get equality. The only reason why “Marriage” is the easy target is because of the arguments that could be used for example “Why can’t I marry the one I love?” The hole issue has less to do with love and a persons right to choose and more to do with benefits and money. Like I said, easy fix…Flat Tax (no more deductions) and allowing Federal benefit receiving Americans the ability to name there benefactor. Problem solved, don’t get blinded by the tactics of the Left or the Right.
Posted by: Michael | December 19, 2011, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Actually, this isn’t an equal rights issue. It is technically a definition issue. All people have the right to marry, but they can only marry according to the current definition of marriage. No one is being denied the right to marry. What they are being prohibited from doing is marrying according to a definition of the word that is not currently acceptable under the law. For those who advocate gay marriage on the basis of equal rights, you are muddling the waters. If a man and a man want to get married, and they should be allowed to do so from an equal rights position, than any person should be given the same equal rights to marry any other consenting individual or group of individuals (polygamy). If we extend marriage to gays and lesbians on the basis of equal rights, but then still deny marriage to another subset of people, we will have another similar fight down the road. Know what it is you are really arguing for. It is not equal rights, it is a limited expansion of the definition of marriage.
Posted by: Sam | February 1, 2012, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm